Gene networks in basal cell carcinoma of the eyelid, analyzed using gene expression profiling

  • Authors:
    • Tatsuya Yunoki
    • Yoshiaki Tabuchi
    • Tetsushi Hirano
    • Shigeharu Miwa
    • Johji Imura
    • Atsushi Hayashi
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: September 21, 2018     https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2018.9484
  • Pages: 6729-6734
Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is the most frequent malignant tumor of the eyelid; it progresses slowly and rarely metastasizes. However, BCC of the eyelid is partially invasive and can extend to the surrounding ocular adnexa even if appropriate treatment is performed. To understand the molecular mechanism underlying its pathogenesis, global gene expression analysis of surgical tissue samples of BCC of the eyelid (n=2) and normal human epidermal keratinocytes was performed using a GeneChip® system. The histopathological examination of surgically removed eyelid tissues showed the tumor nest composed with small basaloid. In the samples from patients 1 and 2, 687 and 713 genes were identified, respectively, demonstrating ≥5.0‑fold higher expression than that noted in normal human epidermal keratinocytes. For the 640 genes with upregulated expression in both patient samples, Ingenuity® pathway analysis showed that the gene network in BCC of the eyelid included many BCC‑associated genes, such as the following: BCL2 apoptosis regulator; Patched‑1; and SRY‑box 9. In addition, unique gene networks related to cancer cell growth, tumorigenesis, and cell survival were identified. These results of integrating microarray analyses provide further insights into the molecular mechanisms involved in BCC of the eyelid and may provide a therapeutic approach for this disease.

Introduction

Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is the most frequent malignant tumor of the eyelid, and it accounts for ~80% of all malignant eyelid tumors (1,2). Well-known risk factors of BCC include high levels of sunlight exposure and ultraviolet radiation and increasing age (2,3). The progression of BCC is relatively slow, and distant metastasis is rare (46). Various treatments have been reported for BCC of the eyelid, including surgical techniques, radiotherapy, cryotherapy, photodynamic therapy, laser ablation, chemotherapy, and immunotherapy (7). However, BCC is topically invasive tumor with destructive growth to surrounding tissue and has a recurrence rate of 1–10% even if appropriate treatment is performed (8). There is limited understanding of how alteration of gene expression in BCC of the eyelid is related to its pathogenesis; therefore, it is important to study the mechanism underlying carcinogenesis at the level of gene profiling.

Several studies have reported gene mutations associated with the carcinogenesis of BCC, such as mutations in the Patched-1 (PTCH1) gene of the sonic hedgehog (SHH) pathway (9) and mutations in the tumor suppressor p53 (10). PTCH-1 suppresses Smoothened signaling and plays an important role in the transcription of cell cycle regulators. p53 is a tumor suppressor gene and prevents gene replication in the case of DNA damage by cell cycle arrest and apoptosis. However, limited information is available at the genetic and molecular levels for BCC of the eyelid, and only a few gene profiling studies have been performed on this disease (11). Therefore, the aim of the current study was to better understand the molecular mechanisms underlying BCC of the eyelid. For this purpose, we analyzed gene expression patterns by using a combination of global microarray analysis and bioinformatics tools.

Patients and methods

Patients and tissue samples

We enrolled two patients, patient 1 (78-year-old woman) and patient 2 (83-year-old woman) with BCC of the eyelid. The patients underwent surgical excision of the tumor at Toyama University Hospital. A part of the tissue samples was frozen and kept at −80°C after sampling for subsequent RNA extraction. The remaining part of the tissue samples was fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde, and paraffin-embedded tissues were stained with hematoxylin-eosin. The study was approved by the institutional review board of the University of Toyama (Toyama, Japan; no. 27–51), and the procedures conformed to the tenets of the World Medical Association's Declaration of Helsinki. Written informed consent was obtained from the patients after they had been provided sufficient information about the procedures.

Cell culture

Normal human epidermal keratinocytes (NHEKs) were obtained from Kurabo Ind., Ltd. (Osaka, Japan; cat. no. KK-4109). They were cultured with HuMedia-KB2 medium (Kurabo Ind., Ltd.) at 37°C in humidified air containing 5% CO2.

RNA isolation

Total RNA was extracted from cancer tissues and NHEKs using a NucleoSpin® RNA isolation kit (Macherey-Nagel GmbH & Co., Düren, Germany) along with On-column DNase I treatment, as per manufacturer instructions. RNA quality was analyzed using a Bioanalyzer 2100 (Agilent Technologies, Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA).

Microarray gene expression analysis

Microarray gene expression analysis was performed using a GeneChip® system with a Human Genome U133-plus 2.0 array, which was spotted with 54,675 probe sets (Affymetrix, Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer's instructions.

The hybridization intensity data obtained were converted into a presence or an absence call for each gene, and changes in gene expression levels between experiments were detected by comparison analysis. The data were further analyzed using the GeneSpring® GX software (Agilent Technologies, Inc.) to extract the significant genes. For gene ontology analysis, including that pertaining to biological processes, cellular components, molecular functions, and gene networks, the data obtained were analyzed using Ingenuity® Pathway Analysis tools (Ingenuity Systems, Inc., Mountain View, CA, USA) (12,13).

Results

Histopathological analysis

We performed histopathological examination of surgically removed eyelid tissues from two patients with a lower eyelid mass. We found that the tumor nest composed with small basaloid cell was proliferating with peripheral palisading and mucinous stroma; the histopathological findings were suggestive of BCC of the eyelid (Fig. 1).

Global gene expression analysis

Global gene expression analysis was performed to identify the genes involved in BCC of the eyelid. Complete lists of probe sets for all samples are available on the Gene Expression Omnibus, a public database (accession no. GSE103439). The GeneSpring software was used to analyze gene expression in the two patient samples and the NHEKs and revealed that many genes showed >5.0-fold difference in expression between the two sample types. The Venn diagram in Fig. 2 summarizes the numbers of specifically and commonly expressed genes in each group. The samples from patients 1 and 2 showed upregulation of the expression of 687 and 713 genes, respectively, as compared to that noted in the control cells (NHEKs); 640 genes were upregulated in both patient samples (Fig. 2). From these 640 genes, the upregulated genes that were reported to be associated with BCC are listed as follows: Nkyrin 2 (ANK2), anoctamin 5 (ANO5), androgen receptor (AR), ATPase Na+/K+ transporting subunit α 2 (ATP1A2), BCL2 apoptosis regulator (BCL2), calcium voltage-gated channel auxiliary subunit alpha2delta1 (CACNA2D1), complement factor H (CFH), chromogranin B (CHGB), cardiomyopathy associated 5 (CMYA5), collagen type VI α 3 chain (COL6A3), dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPYD), fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 (FGFR1), filaggrin (FLG), forkhead box C1 (FOXC1), frizzled class receptor 7 (FZD7), heat shock protein family B member 2 (HSPB2), heat shock protein family B member 3 (HSPB3), heat shock protein family B member 7 (HSPB7), interferon induced transmembrane protein 1 (IFITM1), keratin 1 (KRT1), keratin 4 (KRT4), keratin 7 (KRT7), keratin 13 (KRT13), keratin 19 (KRT19), keratin 23 (KRT23), keratin 25 (KRT25), keratin 79 (KRT79), LIM homeobox 2 (LHX2), LIM and calponin homology domains 1 (LIMCH1), myosin heavy chain (MYH1), nebulin (NEB), nebulin related anchoring protein (NRAP), phosphodiesterase 4D interacting protein (PDE4DIP), PTCH1, SRY-box 9 (SOX9), tropomyosin 2 (TPM2), titin (TTN), tyrosinase related protein 1 (TYRP1) and xin actin binding repeat containing 2 (XIRP2).

Identification of biological functions and gene networks

To identify the biological functions of and the relevant gene networks in the case of genes that were involved in BCC of the eyelid and showed differential expression, functional category and gene network analyses were conducted using the Ingenuity® Pathways Knowledge Base. In the case of the 640 genes that were upregulated in both patient samples, Ingenuity® pathway analysis showed that the gene network included many BCC-associated genes, such as the following (Fig. 3): AR; BCL2; PTCH1; CHGB; heat shock protein 27 (Hsp27); TPM2; NEB; XIRP2; TTN; CACNA2D1; CMYA5; MYH1; and SOX9.

We also identified unique gene networks related to cancer cell growth, tumorigenesis, and cell survival (Fig. 4). The cancer cell growth gene network included several genes, such as the following (Fig. 4A): AR, erb-b2 receptor tyrosine kinase 3 (ERBB3), C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 12 (CXCL12), BCL2, insulin-like growth-factor-binding protein 5 (IGFBP5), matrix metallopeptidase 2 (MMP2), platelet-derived growth factor receptor α (PDGFRA), plasminogen activator, tissue type (PLAT), and prostate stem cell antigen (PSCA). This network was associated with the biological functions involved in cancer cell growth. The tumorigenesis gene network included several genes, such as the following: BCL2, KIT proto-oncogene receptor tyrosine kinase (KIT), CXCL12, serpin family F member 1 (SERPLNF1), insulin-like growth factor 2 (IGF2), IGFBP5, PLAT, and neurotrophic receptor tyrosine kinase 2 (NTRK2). This network was associated with biological functions involved in tumorigenesis (Fig. 4B). The cell survival gene network included several genes, such as the following (Fig. 4C): AR; PSCA; PTCH1; IGF2; fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 (FGFR1); ERBB3; IGFBP5; versican (VCAN); BCL2; and galanin and GMAP prepropeptide (GAL). This network was associated with biological functions involved in cell survival.

Discussion

BCC of the eyelid is the most frequent malignant tumor of the eyelid; however, to date, only insufficient information is available regarding the molecular mechanisms underlying this disease. In the current study, we examined gene expression patterns associated with BCC of the eyelid by performing global microarray analysis, and gene network analysis of differentially expressed genes was performed using computational gene expression analysis tools.

We successfully identified a unique gene network on the basis of our data for upregulated gene expression in patients with BCC of the eyelid. This network included PTCH1 (14,15), which has been reported as an important player in BCC pathogenesis. The PTCH1 gene is a negative regulator of the SHH pathway; the dysfunction of this pathway has been recognized as essential events for BCC development (15,16). Furthermore, it is reported that PTCH-1 mutations contribute to the development of cutaneous eyelid BCC (17). In this network, PTCH1 was found to interact with several genes, such as MYH1, CACNA2D1, AR, SOX9, BCL2, CHGB, Hsp27, TPM2, NEB, NIRP2, TTN, and CMYA5. These genes have been reported to be related to BCC (1820); it is possible that they play a role at the molecular level in the pathogenesis of BCC of the eyelid. Among them, SOX9 (21,22) and BCL2 (23,24) have been reported as biomarkers of BCC and may play an important role through interactions with PTCH1 in the pathogenesis of this disease.

Our functional category analysis showed that the upregulated genes in patients with BCC of the eyelid were related to biological functions such as cancer cell growth, tumorigenesis, and cell survival (Fig. 4). The cancer cell growth gene network consisted of nine genes, that is, AR (25), BCL2 (26), IGFBP5 (27), CXCL12 (28), ERBB3 (29), MMP2 (30), PDGFRA (31), PLAT (32) and PSCA (33), which have been found to be associated with the cell growth of various cancers, such as renal cell carcinoma, neuroblastoma and pancreatic cancer. The tumorigenesis gene network consisted of 10 genes, that is, PTCH1 (9,34), BCL2 (35), FGFR1 (36), AR (37), ERBB3 (38), IGF2 (39), IGFBP5 (40), PSCA (41), VCAN (42), and GAL (43), which have been reported to be associated with the tumorigenesis of various cancers, such as prostate cancer, neck squamous cell carcinoma and breast cancer. The cell survival gene network consisted of eight genes, that is, BCL2 (44), LGF2 (45), IGFBP5 (46), PLAT (47), NTRK2 (48), SERPINF1 (49), KIT (50), and CXCL12 (50), which have been found to be associated with cell survival in various cancers, such as lung cancer and prostate cancer. In BCC of the eyelid, the genes upregulated in these networks may play an important role in BCC cell survival through the network.

To summarize, from the 640 genes that were upregulated in both patient samples, Ingenuity® pathway analysis showed that the gene network of BCC of the eyelid included many BCC-associated genes, such as BCL2, PTCH1, and SOX9. We identified unique gene networks related with cancer cell growth, tumorigenesis, and cell survival. Thus, our results may help clarify the pathogenesis of BCC of the eyelid at the molecular level. However, the interaction between gene expression and this disease needs to be studied further. These results of integrating microarray analyses provide further insights into the molecular mechanisms involved in BCC of the eyelid and may lead to a therapeutic approach for this disease.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

The present study was supported in part by JSPS KAKENHI (grant no. JP16K20309).

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

Authors' contributions

TY, YT and TH conceived the study, designed the experiments, wrote the manuscript and performed the experiments. SM and JI also performed experiments. TY and AH provided materials for microarray analysis and were involved in data analysis.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the institutional review board of the University of Toyama (no. 27–51). All patients provided written informed consent.

Patient consent for publication

Written informed consent was obtained from the patients after they were provided with sufficient information about the procedures and publication.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Glossary

Abbreviations

Abbreviations:

ANK2

ankyrin 2

ANO5

anoctamin 5

AR

androgen receptor

ATP1A2

ATPase Na+/K+ transporting subunit α 2

BCC

basal cell carcinoma

BCL2

BCL2 apoptosis regulator

CACNA2D1

calcium voltage-gated channel auxiliary subunit alpha2delta1

CFH

complement factor H

CHGB

chromogranin B

CMYA5

cardiomyopathy associated 5

COL6A3

collagen type VI α 3 chain

CXCL12

C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 12

DPYD

dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase

ERBB3

erb-b2 receptor tyrosine kinase 3

FGFR1

fibroblast growth factor receptor 1

FLG

filaggrin

FOXC1

forkhead box C1

FZD7

frizzled class receptor 7

GAL

galanin and GMAP prepropeptide

Hsp27

heat shock protein 27

HSPB2

heat shock protein family B member 2

HSPB3

heat shock protein family B member 3

HSPB7

heat shock protein family B member 7

IFITM1

interferon induced transmembrane protein 1

IGF2

insulin like growth factor 2

IGFBP5

insulin like growth factor binding protein 5

KIT

KIT proto-oncogene receptor tyrosine kinase

KRT1

keratin 1

KRT4

keratin 4

KRT7

keratin 7

KRT13

keratin 13

KRT19

keratin 19

KRT23

keratin 23

KRT25

keratin 25

KRT79

keratin 79

LHX2

LIM homeobox 2

LIMCH1

LIM and calponin homology domains 1

MMP2

matrix metallopeptidase 2

MYH1

myosin heavy chain 1

NEB

nebulin

NHEK

normal human epidermal keratinocytes

NRAP

nebulin related anchoring protein

NTRK2

neurotrophic receptor tyrosine kinase 2

PDE4DIP

phosphodiesterase 4D interacting protein

PDGFRA

platelet-derived growth factor receptor α

PLAT

plasminogen activator, tissue type

PSCA

prostate stem cell antigen

PTCH1

Patched-1

SERPINF1

serpin family F member 1

SHH

sonic hedgehog

SOX9

SRY-box 9

TPM2

tropomyosin 2

TTN

titin

TYRP1

tyrosinase related protein 1

VCAN

versican

XIRP2

xin actin binding repeat containing 2

References

1 

Cook BE Jr and Bartley GB: Epidemiologic characteristics and clinical course of patients with malignant eyelid tumors in an incidence cohort in Olmsted County, Minnesota. Ophthalmology. 106:746–750. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

2 

Allali J, D'Hermies F and Renard G: Basal cell carcinomas of the eyelids. Ophthalmologica. 219:57–71. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

3 

Neale RE, Davis M, Pandeya N, Whiteman DC and Green AC: Basal cell carcinoma on the trunk is associated with excessive sun exposure. J Am Acad Dermatol. 56:380–386. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

4 

Lindgren G, Lindblom B and Larkö O: Mohs' micrographic surgery for basal cell carcinomas on the eyelids and medial canthal area. II. Reconstruction and follow-up. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 78:430–436. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

5 

Malhotra R, Huilgol SC, Huynh NT and Selva D: The Australian Mohs database, part II: Periocular basal cell carcinoma outcome at 5-year follow-up. Ophthalmology. 111:631–636. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

6 

Morris DS, Elzaridi E, Clarke L, Dickinson AJ and Lawrence CM: Periocular basal cell carcinoma: 5-year outcome following Slow Mohs surgery with formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded sections and delayed closure. Br J Ophthalmol. 93:474–476. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

7 

Margo CE and Waltz K: Basal cell carcinoma of the eyelid and periocular skin. Surv Ophthalmol. 38:169–192. 1993. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

8 

Diepgen TL and Mahler V: The epidemiology of skin cancer. Br J Dermatol. 146:1–6. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

9 

de Zwaan SE and Haass NK: Genetics of basal cell carcinoma. Australas J Dermatol. 51:81–92; quiz 93–94. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

10 

Muller PA, Vousden KH and Norman JC: p53 and its mutants in tumor cell migration and invasion. J Cell Biol. 192:209–218. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

11 

Heller ER, Gor A, Wang D, Hu Q, Lucchese A, Kanduc D, Katdare M, Liu S and Sinha AA: Molecular signatures of basal cell carcinoma susceptibility and pathogenesis: A genomic approach. Int J Oncol. 42:583–596. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

12 

Tabuchi Y, Yunoki T, Hoshi N, Suzuki N and Kondo T: Genes and gene networks involved in sodium fluoride-elicited cell death accompanying endoplasmic reticulum stress in oral epithelial cells. Int J Mol Sci. 15:8959–8978. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

13 

Yunoki T, Tabuchi Y, Hayashi A and Kondo T: Network analysis of genes involved in the enhancement of hyperthermia sensitivity by the knockdown of BAG3 in human oral squamous cell carcinoma cells. Int J Mol Med. 38:236–242. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

14 

Reifenberger J, Wolter M, Knobbe CB, Köhler B, Schönicke A, Scharwächter C, Kumar K, Blaschke B, Ruzicka T and Reifenberger G: Somatic mutations in the PTCH, SMOH, SUFUH and TP53 genes in sporadic basal cell carcinomas. Br J Dermatol. 152:43–51. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

15 

Palmer CJ, Galan-Caridad JM, Weisberg SP, Lei L, Esquilin JM, Croft GF, Wainwright B, Canoll P, Owens DM and Reizis B: Zfx facilitates tumorigenesis caused by activation of the Hedgehog pathway. Cancer Res. 74:5914–5924. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

16 

Lupu M, Caruntu C, Ghita MA, Voiculescu V, Voiculescu S, Rosca AE, Caruntu A, Moraru L, Popa IM, Calenic B, et al: Gene expression and proteome analysis as sources of biomarkers in basal cell carcinoma. Dis Markers. 2016:98312372016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

17 

Celebi AR, Kiratli H and Soylemezoglu F: Evaluation of the ‘Hedgehog’ signaling pathways in squamous and basal cell carcinomas of the eyelids and conjunctiva. Oncol Lett. 12:467–472. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

18 

Astarci HM, Gurbuz GA, Sengul D, Hucumenoglu S, Kocer U and Ustun H: Significance of androgen receptor and CD10 expression in cutaneous basal cell carcinoma and trichoepithelioma. Oncol Lett. 10:3466–3470. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

19 

Sharpe HJ, Pau G, Dijkgraaf GJ, Basset-Seguin N, Modrusan Z, Januario T, Tsui V, Durham AB, Dlugosz AA, Haverty PM, et al: Genomic analysis of smoothened inhibitor resistance in basal cell carcinoma. Cancer Cell. 27:327–341. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

20 

Trautinger F, Kindas-Mügge I, Dekrout B, Knobler RM and Metze D: Expression of the 27-kDa heat shock protein in human epidermis and in epidermal neoplasms: An immunohistological study. Br J Dermatol. 133:194–202. 1995. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

21 

Vidal VP, Ortonne N and Schedl A: SOX9 expression is a general marker of basal cell carcinoma and adnexal-related neoplasms. J Cutan Pathol. 35:373–379. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

22 

Youssef KK, Lapouge G, Bouvrée K, Rorive S, Brohée S, Appelstein O, Larsimont JC, Sukumaran V, Van de Sande B, Pucci D, et al: Adult interfollicular tumour-initiating cells are reprogrammed into an embryonic hair follicle progenitor-like fate during basal cell carcinoma initiation. Nat Cell Biol. 14:1282–1294. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

23 

Zbacnik AP, Rawal A, Lee B, Werling R, Knapp D and Mesa H: Cutaneous basal cell carcinosarcoma: Case report and literature review. J Cutan Pathol. 42:903–910. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

24 

Regl G, Kasper M, Schnidar H, Eichberger T, Neill GW, Philpott MP, Esterbauer H, Hauser-Kronberger C, Frischauf AM and Aberger F: Activation of the BCL2 promoter in response to Hedgehog/GLI signal transduction is predominantly mediated by GLI2. Cancer Res. 64:7724–7731. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

25 

He D, Li L, Zhu G, Liang L, Guan Z, Chang L, Chen Y, Yeh S and Chang C: ASC-J9 suppresses renal cell carcinoma progression by targeting an androgen receptor-dependent HIF2α/VEGF signaling pathway. Cancer Res. 74:4420–4430. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

26 

Kannan S, Sutphin RM, Hall MG, Golfman LS, Fang W, Nolo RM, Akers LJ, Hammitt RA, McMurray JS, Kornblau SM, et al: Notch activation inhibits AML growth and survival: A potential therapeutic approach. J Exp Med. 210:321–337. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

27 

Tanno B, Cesi V, Vitali R, Sesti F, Giuffrida ML, Mancini C, Calabretta B and Raschellà G: Silencing of endogenous IGFBP-5 by micro RNA interference affects proliferation, apoptosis and differentiation of neuroblastoma cells. Cell Death Differ. 12:213–223. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

28 

Sutton A, Friand V, Brulé-Donneger S, Chaigneau T, Ziol M, Sainte-Catherine O, Poiré A, Saffar L, Kraemer M, Vassy J, et al: Stromal cell-derived factor-1/chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand 12 stimulates human hepatoma cell growth, migration, and invasion. Mol Cancer Res. 5:21–33. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

29 

Gaborit N, Abdul-Hai A, Mancini M, Lindzen M, Lavi S, Leitner O, Mounier L, Chentouf M, Dunoyer S, Ghosh M, et al: Examination of HER3 targeting in cancer using monoclonal antibodies. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 112:839–844. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

30 

Kesanakurti D, Chetty C, Dinh DH, Gujrati M and Rao JS: Role of MMP-2 in the regulation of IL-6/Stat3 survival signaling via interaction with α5β1 integrin in glioma. Oncogene. 32:327–340. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

31 

Pettazzoni P, Viale A, Shah P, Carugo A, Ying H, Wang H, Genovese G, Seth S, Minelli R, Green T, et al: Genetic events that limit the efficacy of MEK and RTK inhibitor therapies in a mouse model of KRAS-driven pancreatic cancer. Cancer Res. 75:1091–1101. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

32 

Menouny M, Binoux M and Babajko S: Role of insulin-like growth factor binding protein-2 and its limited proteolysis in neuroblastoma cell proliferation: Modulation by transforming growth factor-beta and retinoic acid. Endocrinology. 138:683–690. 1997. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

33 

Saeki N, Gu J, Yoshida T and Wu X: Prostate stem cell antigen: A Jekyll and Hyde molecule? Clin Cancer Res. 16:3533–3538. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

34 

Northcott PA, Jones DT, Kool M, Robinson GW, Gilbertson RJ, Cho YJ, Pomeroy SL, Korshunov A, Lichter P, Taylor MD and Pfister SM: Medulloblastomics: The end of the beginning. Nat Rev Cancer. 12:818–834. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

35 

Sánchez-García I and Grütz G: Tumorigenic activity of the BCR-ABL oncogenes is mediated by BCL2. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 92:5287–5291. 1995. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

36 

Marshall ME, Hinz TK, Kono SA, Singleton KR, Bichon B, Ware KE, Marek L, Frederick BA, Raben D and Heasley LE: Fibroblast growth factor receptors are components of autocrine signaling networks in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma cells. Clin Cancer Res. 17:5016–5025. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

37 

Schroeder A, Herrmann A, Cherryholmes G, Kowolik C, Buettner R, Pal S, Yu H, Müller-Newen G and Jove R: Loss of androgen receptor expression promotes a stem-like cell phenotype in prostate cancer through STAT3 signaling. Cancer Res. 74:1227–1237. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

38 

Vaught DB, Stanford JC, Young C, Hicks DJ, Wheeler F, Rinehart C, Sánchez V, Koland J, Muller WJ, Arteaga CL and Cook RS: HER3 is required for HER2-induced preneoplastic changes to the breast epithelium and tumor formation. Cancer Res. 72:2672–2682. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

39 

Veronese A, Lupini L, Consiglio J, Visone R, Ferracin M, Fornari F, Zanesi N, Alder H, D'Elia G, Gramantieri L, et al: Oncogenic role of miR-483-3p at the IGF2/483 locus. Cancer Res. 70:3140–3149. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

40 

Butt AJ, Dickson KA, McDougall F and Baxter RC: Insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-5 inhibits the growth of human breast cancer cells in vitro and in vivo. J Biol Chem. 278:29676–29685. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

41 

Chapman EJ, Kelly G and Knowles MA: Genes involved in differentiation, stem cell renewal, and tumorigenesis are modulated in telomerase-immortalized human urothelial cells. Mol Cancer Res. 6:1154–1168. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

42 

Kunisada M, Yogianti F, Sakumi K, Ono R, Nakabeppu Y and Nishigori C: Increased expression of versican in the inflammatory response to UVB- and reactive oxygen species-induced skin tumorigenesis. Am J Pathol. 179:3056–3065. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

43 

Tofighi R, Joseph B, Xia S, Xu ZQ, Hamberger B, Hökfelt T and Ceccatelli S: Galanin decreases proliferation of PC12 cells and induces apoptosis via its subtype 2 receptor (GalR2). Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 105:2717–2722. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

44 

Lin Y, Fukuchi J, Hiipakka RA, Kokontis JM and Xiang J: Up-regulation of Bcl-2 is required for the progression of prostate cancer cells from an androgen-dependent to an androgen-independent growth stage. Cell Res. 17:531–536. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

45 

Linnerth NM, Baldwin M, Campbell C, Brown M, McGowan H and Moorehead RA: IGF-II induces CREB phosphorylation and cell survival in human lung cancer cells. Oncogene. 24:7310–7319. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

46 

Kashyap AS, Hollier BG, Manton KJ, Satyamoorthy K, Leavesley DI and Upton Z: Insulin-like growth factor-I:vitronectin complex-induced changes in gene expression effect breast cell survival and migration. Endocrinology. 152:1388–1401. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

47 

Lin L, Jin Y and Hu K: Tissue-type plasminogen activator (tPA) promotes M1 macrophage survival through p90 ribosomal S6 kinase (RSK) and p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway. J Biol Chem. 290:7910–7917. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

48 

Osborne JK, Larsen JE, Shields MD, Gonzales JX, Shames DS, Sato M, Kulkarni A, Wistuba II, Girard L, Minna JD and Cobb MH: NeuroD1 regulates survival and migration of neuroendocrine lung carcinomas via signaling molecules TrkB and NCAM. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 110:6524–6529. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

49 

Sheikpranbabu S, Haribalaganesh R and Gurunathan S: Pigment epithelium-derived factor inhibits advanced glycation end-products-induced cytotoxicity in retinal pericytes. Diabetes Metab. 37:505–511. 2011.PubMed/NCBI

50 

Sun J, Pedersen M and Rönnstrand L: The D816V mutation of c-Kit circumvents a requirement for Src family kinases in c-Kit signal transduction. J Biol Chem. 284:11039–11047. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Related Articles

Journal Cover

November-2018
Volume 16 Issue 5

Print ISSN: 1792-1074
Online ISSN:1792-1082

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Yunoki T, Tabuchi Y, Hirano T, Miwa S, Imura J and Hayashi A: Gene networks in basal cell carcinoma of the eyelid, analyzed using gene expression profiling. Oncol Lett 16: 6729-6734, 2018
APA
Yunoki, T., Tabuchi, Y., Hirano, T., Miwa, S., Imura, J., & Hayashi, A. (2018). Gene networks in basal cell carcinoma of the eyelid, analyzed using gene expression profiling. Oncology Letters, 16, 6729-6734. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2018.9484
MLA
Yunoki, T., Tabuchi, Y., Hirano, T., Miwa, S., Imura, J., Hayashi, A."Gene networks in basal cell carcinoma of the eyelid, analyzed using gene expression profiling". Oncology Letters 16.5 (2018): 6729-6734.
Chicago
Yunoki, T., Tabuchi, Y., Hirano, T., Miwa, S., Imura, J., Hayashi, A."Gene networks in basal cell carcinoma of the eyelid, analyzed using gene expression profiling". Oncology Letters 16, no. 5 (2018): 6729-6734. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2018.9484