|
1
|
Waggoner SE: Cervical cancer. Lancet.
361:2217–2225. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
2
|
Sankaranarayanan R, Joshi S, Muwonge R,
Esmy PO, Basu P, Prabhu P, Bhatla N, Nene BM, Shaw J, Poli URR, et
al Indian HPV vaccine study group, : Can a single dose of human
papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine prevent cervical cancer? Early
findings from an Indian study. Vaccine. 36:4783–4791. 2018.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
3
|
Liu Y, Zhang L, Zhao G, Che L, Zhang H and
Fang J: The clinical research of Thinprep Cytology Test (TCT)
combined with HPV-DNA detection in screening cervical cancer. Cell
Mol Biol. 63:92–95. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
4
|
Fuglsang K, Haldorsen IS, Avall-Lundqvist
E, Lindahl G, Roed H, Woie K, Pakarinen P, Thoroddsen A, Anttila M
and Blaakaer J: Cervical cancer staging, pretreatment planning, and
surgical treatment in the Nordic countries-Survey from the Surgical
Subcommittee of the Nordic Society of Gynecological Oncology. Acta
Obstet Gynecol Scand. 97:1178–1184. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
5
|
Csutak C, Badea R, Bolboaca SD, Ordeanu C,
Nagy VM, Fekete Z, Chiorean L and Dudea SM: Multimodal endocavitary
ultrasound versus MRI and clinical findings in pre- and
post-treatment advanced cervical cancer. Preliminary report. Med
Ultrason. 18:75–81. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
6
|
Cosgrove D, Piscaglia F, Bamber J, Bojunga
J, Correas JM, Gilja OH, Klauser AS, Sporea I, Calliada F,
Cantisani V, et al EFSUMB, : EFSUMB guidelines and recommendations
on the clinical use of ultrasound elastography. Part 2: Clinical
applications. Ultraschall Med. 34:238–253. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
7
|
Zhi H, Xiao XY, Yang HY, Ou B, Wen YL and
Luo BM: Ultrasonic elastography in breast cancer diagnosis: Strain
ratio vs 5-point scale. Acad Radiol. 17:1227–1233. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
8
|
Brodersen J: High incidence of cervical
cancer in women over 60 is likely due to less intensive cervical
screening in this generation of women. BMJ Evid Based Med.
23:372018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
9
|
Wu ES, Jeronimo J and Feldman S: Barriers
and challenges to treatment alternatives for early-stage cervical
cancer in lower-resource settings. J Glob Oncol. 3:572–582. 2017.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
10
|
Matsuo K, Shimada M, Yamaguchi S, Kanao H,
Nakanishi T, Saito T, Kamiura S, Iwata T, Mikami M and Sugiyama T:
Identifying a candidate population for ovarian conservation in
young women with clinical stage IB-IIB cervical cancer. Int J
Cancer. 142:1022–1032. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
11
|
Santin AD, Zhan F, Bignotti E, Siegel ER,
Cané S, Bellone S, Palmieri M, Anfossi S, Thomas M, Burnett A, et
al: Gene expression profiles of primary HPV16- and HPV18-infected
early stage cervical cancers and normal cervical epithelium:
Identification of novel candidate molecular markers for cervical
cancer diagnosis and therapy. Virology. 331:269–291. 2005.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
12
|
Sangwa-Lugoma G, Mahmud S, Nasr SH, Liaras
J, Kayembe PK, Tozin RR, Drouin P, Lorincz A, Ferenczy A and Franco
EL: Visual inspection as a cervical cancer screening method in a
primary health care setting in Africa. Int J Cancer. 119:1389–1395.
2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
13
|
Zhao FH, Lewkowitz AK, Chen F, Lin MJ, Hu
SY, Zhang X, Pan QJ, Ma JF, Niyazi M, Li CQ, et al: Pooled analysis
of a self-sampling HPV DNA Test as a cervical cancer primary
screening method. J Natl Cancer Inst. 104:178–188. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
14
|
Zhu J, Norman I, Elfgren K, Gaberi V,
Hagmar B, Hjerpe A and Andersson S: A comparison of liquid-based
cytology and Pap smear as a screening method for cervical cancer.
Oncol Rep. 18:157–160. 2007.PubMed/NCBI
|
|
15
|
Huang WC, Yang JM, Yang YC and Yang SH:
Ultrasonographic characteristics and cystoscopic correlates of
bladder wall invasion by endophytic cervical cancer. Ultrasound
Obstet Gynecol. 27:680–686. 2006. View
Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
16
|
Ma X, Li Q, Wang JL, Shao J, Zhu YC, Ding
W, Zhang HS, Wang HY and Shen JK: Comparison of elastography based
on transvaginal ultrasound and MRI in assessing parametrial
invasion of cervical cancer. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc. 66:27–35.
2017. View
Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
17
|
Salvo G, Ramirez PT, Levenback CF, Munsell
MF, Euscher ED, Soliman PT and Frumovitz M: Sensitivity and
negative predictive value for sentinel lymph node biopsy in women
with early-stage cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 145:96–101. 2017.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
18
|
Takagi H, Sakamoto J, Osaka Y, Shibata T,
Fujita S and Sasagawa T: Usefulness of the maximum standardized
uptake value for the diagnosis and staging of patients with
cervical cancer undergoing positron emission tomography/computed
tomography. Medicine (Baltimore). 97:e98562018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
19
|
Fischerova D, Cibula D, Stenhova H,
Vondrichova H, Calda P, Zikan M, Freitag P, Slama J, Dundr P and
Belacek J: Transrectal ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in
staging of early cervical cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 18:766–772.
2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
20
|
Lorenz A, Ermert H, Sommerfeld HJ,
Garcia-Schürmann M, Senge T and Philippou S: Ultrasound
elastography of the prostate. A new technique for tumor detection.
Ultraschall Med. 21:8–15. 2000.(In German). PubMed/NCBI
|
|
21
|
Sikdar S, Shah JP, Gebreab T, Yen RH,
Gilliams E, Danoff J and Gerber LH: Novel applications of
ultrasound technology to visualize and characterize myofascial
trigger points and surrounding soft tissue. Arch Phys Med Rehabil.
90:1829–1838. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
