Effect of CD133 overexpression on bone metastasis in prostate cancer cell line LNCaP
- Authors:
- Published online on: June 6, 2019 https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2019.10443
- Pages: 1189-1198
-
Copyright: © Sohn et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License.
Abstract
Introduction
Prostate cancer (PC) is the most commonly diagnosed form of cancer and the sixth leading cause of cancer-related deaths among men worldwide (1). The 5-year survival rate is approximately 100% in patients with localized PC, but it drops to 31% in those with distant metastasis (2). Similar to most other solid malignancies, PC may metastasize to distant organs such as the liver, lungs, and brain; however, it has an abnormally high propensity to metastasize to bones (3). Thus, it is desirable to gain a better understanding of mechanisms underlying PC metastasis to the bone for development and use of therapies to improve patient survival.
Studies have provided new insights into this advanced disease based on critical molecular and cellular events surrounding tumor progression, invasion, and metastasis to the bone and other sites (4). Epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT), in which cellular, morphological, and functional switches may transform adherent epithelial cells to migratory mesenchymal cells, is critical for tumorigenic progression and cancer metastasis. EMT may promote stem cell-related properties and generate cells with features related to tumor initiation (5). During EMT, tumor cells exhibit stem cell characteristics and confer invasive and migratory properties to primary tumor cells, ultimately resulting in metastasis (5).
It is hypothesized that tumors rely on a small portion of cells called cancer stem cells (CSCs) that have the ability to self-renew and generate multiple ‘mature’ tumor progenies (6). CSCs are typically dormant, and their regrowth is responsible for metastases (7). Primary tumors comprise a majority of differentiated epithelial cells and a small number of cells expressing stem cell markers (i.e., PC stem cells) (8). A previous study showed that CSCs derived from primary tumors exhibited increased invasion, self-renewal, and clonogenic properties (9). These cells may be identified using several CSC markers such as CD133, c-Met, and prostate stem cell antigens (10). A recent analysis involving a cohort of high-risk PC patients showed that the number of positive cancer cells for the a-6 and a-2 integrin subunits and the c-Met receptor in primary PC correlated with bone metastatic progression (11).
CD133 (prominin-1), a 5-transmembrane glycoprotein, was originally recognized as a hematopoietic stem cell marker (12). CD133 is regarded as an important cell surface marker used to identify cancer-initiating cell subpopulations in brain tumors, colon carcinoma, head and neck cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma, thyroid carcinoma, and prostate carcinoma (13,14). Previous experiments have demonstrated a correlation between upregulated CD133 expression and progression of EMT in head and neck cancer cells and head and neck squamous cell carcinoma tissues (15). The CD133-mediated molecular mechanisms regulating cancer-initiating cells in bone metastasis of PC remain unclear.
In the present study, we have demonstrated that CD133 plays a significant role by increasing stemness, enhancing EMT, and promoting bone metastasis in a PC cell line, LNCaP. Furthermore, we aimed to identify cytokines secreted by CD133+ LNCaP cells that play a critical role during bone metastasis of PC cells. Our results suggest that CD133+ PC cells play a central role in bone metastasis.
Materials and methods
Cell culture
LNCaP and 293T cells were purchased from the Korean Cell Line Bank (KCLB; no. 21573), Korean Cell Line Research Foundation, Seoul, Korea, in 2017. The cells were maintained in RPMI-1640 (Welgene, Daegu, Korea) supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (FBS; Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA) and 0.1% antibiotic/antimycotic solution (Welgene) at 37°C in a 5% CO2 humidified chamber.
Cloning of human CD133 and establishment of stably transfected LNCaPVec control and LNCapCD133+ cells
HT29 colon cancer cells were used as a source of CD133. Cloning of CD133 was performed as previously described (15). Plasmid pcDNA3.1/N-terminal green fluorescent protein (NT-GFP) lacking the CD133 insert was used as a transfection control. 293T cells were used as a positive control to evaluate the translated fusion product.
Stable cell lines overexpressing the CD133 protein were obtained through co-transfection of confluent LNCaP-luciferase cells in 100-mm plates with 20 µg pcDNA3.1/NT-GFP:CD133 or pcDNA3.1/NT-GFP plasmid using the FuGENE HD transfection reagent, as previously described (15).
Western blot analysis
After reaching approximately 80% confluency, the medium was removed, and the cells were washed twice with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, pH 7.4). Cell lysates were prepared in 200 µl cold lysis buffer [1% NP-40, 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 150 mM sodium chloride (NaCl), 0.02% sodium azide, 150 mg/ml of phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF), 2 mg/ml of aprotinin, 20 mg/ml of leupeptin, and 1 mg/ml of pepstatin A]. Approximately 30 mg of tissue lysate was separated via 10% sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and transferred onto a polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membrane (Amersham, Piscataway, NJ, USA). Each membrane was blocked for 30 min with a blocking solution containing 5% skim milk in Tris-buffered saline containing Tween-20 (TBST, 2.42 g/l Tris-HCl, 8 g/l NaCl, 0.1% Tween-20, pH 7.6) and rinsed with TBST. The membrane was incubated overnight at 4°C with appropriate primary antibodies, including anti-CD133 (1:1,000; cat. no. MBS850595; MyBioSource, San Diego, CA, USA), anti-octamer-binding transcription factor 4 (Oct-4, 1:1,000; cat. no. 2750, Cell Signaling Technology, Beverly, MA, USA), anti-NANOG (1:1,000; cat. no. 3580; Cell Signaling Technology), anti-(sex determining region Y)-box 2 (SOX2, 1:1,000; cat. no. 2748; Cell Signaling Technology), anti-E-cadherin (1:1,000; cat. no. sc-8426; Santa-Cruz Biotechnology Inc., Dallas, TX, USA), anti-transcription factor 4 (TCF-4, 1:1,000; cat. no. 2953; Cell Signaling Technology), anti-vimentin (1:1,000; cat. no. sc-6260; Santa-Cruz Biotechnology Inc.), anti-β-catenin (1:1,000; cat. no. 9562; Cell Signaling Technology), and anti-macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF, 1:1,000; cat. no. 88186; Cell Signaling Technology). A mouse monoclonal immunoglobulin G (IgG) specific for glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH, 1:1,000; cat. no. sc-47724; Santa-Cruz Biotechnology Inc.) was used as a control. The membrane was rinsed with TBST, and protein immunoreactivity was detected using an enhanced chemiluminescence detection kit (ECL, Amersham).
Confocal microscopic analyses
Immunolabeled cells were counterstained with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) provided in ProLong Gold antifade mounting medium (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA) to visualize nuclear morphology. Digital images were acquired at the Korea Basic Science Institute Gwangju Center using a TCS SP5 AOBS laser-scanning confocal microscope (Leica Microsystems, Heidelberg, Germany).
Colony-forming assays
Cells were seeded at a density of 1,000 cells/well in non-adherent 24-well culture plates coated with a 10% poly (2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) (polyHEMA) solution (Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany) in absolute ethanol and then dried overnight. After seeding, cells were incubated in serum-free Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) supplemented with 200 ng/ml epidermal growth factor (Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA), 20 ng/ml of basic fibroblast growth factor (Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA), and B-27 supplement (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). After 5 days of incubation, the number of spheroids in each well was counted using a light microscope (Zeiss, Zena, Germany).
Cell migration assay
Cells were seeded at 1×105 cells/well in 6-well plates and cultured to approximately 90% confluency in 1 ml of DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS. The media were removed from the wells, and a straight transverse line was drawn through the adherent cells using a ruler and sterile 200-µl plastic micropipette tip to produce a uniform gap. Serum-free DMEM was added, and the distance between the gaps was measured immediately and 24 h later, following image capture of six random microscopic fields. The distance measured immediately was defined as 100%.
Cell invasion assay
Cell invasion was assessed using a chemotaxis chamber (Neuro Probe, Gaithersburg, MD, USA). The cells (5×104 cells in 0.35-ml serum-free DMEM per well) were seeded into the top chamber of a 10-well invasion chamber assay plate. DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS was placed in the lower chamber, and a matrigel-coated membrane was inserted between the two chambers. After incubation for 24 h at 37°C, the membranes were fixed and stained with a Hemacolor rapid staining kit (Merck KGaA). Cells from five random microscopic fields (each 0.5 mm2) were counted using a hematocytometer under a light microscope (Zeiss).
Immunofluorescence
To confirm morphological changes, cells were washed thrice with PBS, fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) for 10 min at room temperature, and permeabilized with PBS containing 0.25% Triton X-100 (PBST) for 10–15 min at room temperature. After three washes with PBS, cells were blocked with 1% bovine serum albumin for 30 min. Samples were incubated overnight at 4°C with the relevant antibodies anti-MIF (1:500; Cell Signaling Technology) and anti-F actin (1:500; Santa-Cruz Biotechnology Inc.) for 2 h at room temperature. After three washes with PBS, immune-labeled cells were counterstained with 50 µl of DAPI at 37°C for 10 min. Cells were analyzed using a laser scanning confocal microscope (Leica Microsystems).
Immunoprecipitation
Immunoprecipitation analysis was carried out as previously described (16). Briefly, cells were lysed using a protein lysis buffer [1% (v/v) Triton X-100, 150 mM NaCl, 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 5 mM ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), and protease inhibitors], and cell lysates were incubated overnight with primary anti-β-catenin and protein A or G beads (GE Healthcare, Uppsala, Sweden) at 4°C on a rotator. The beads were washed, boiled in Laemmli buffer, and processed for western blotting.
Animals
Five-week-old male athymic nude mice (BL-6/Nu, 20–25 g; Orient Bio Co., Ltd., Seoul, Korea) were housed under controlled light conditions and provided water ad libitum. All experimental procedures involving animals were performed in compliance with institutional and governmental requirements and approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (approval no. CIACUC2015-A0032), Chosun University, Gwangju, Korea.
Intracardiac xenograft model
Twenty mice were subjected to intracardiac injections of LNCaPVec or LNCaPCD133+ cells and 10 mice subjected PBS as mock mice to examine the ability of PC cells to metastasize to bone, respectively. Before injection, the cells were transfected with the pGL4.5 vector plasmid encoding luciferase (Promega Corporation, Madison, WI, USA). The stably transfected cells were grown in Hank's balanced salt solution (HBSS; Welgene) supplemented with hygromycin (2 mg/ml; Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA) and, luciferase activity was measured using the Luciferase Assay System (Promega Corporation) and detected by luminometer GENios Plus (Tecan Group Ltd., Salzburg, Austria). The severe combined immunodeficient mice were anesthetized using isoflurane gas. Subsequently, LNCaPVec+ or LNCaPCD133+ cells (1×105 cells per mouse) were injected into the left cardiac ventricle, as per the technique first described by Arguello et al (17) with some modifications. After 4 weeks, images of tumor-bearing tissues excised from mice during necropsy were obtained.
Bioluminescence imaging
After intracardiac injection, mice were weekly imaged via bioluminescence for 4–6 weeks using the IVIS® imaging system (PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA, USA) at the Korea Basic Science Institute (Gwangju, Korea). Images were captured and processed using the Living Image® v.4.2 software. Anesthesia was induced using inhaled isoflurane and maintained with 2% isoflurane mixed with oxygen/nitrogen via nose cone delivery. d-Luciferin (3 mg dissolved in water) was administered at 150 mg/kg in Dulbecco's phosphate-buffered saline (DPBS) via intraperitoneal injection. Optical imaging was acquired approximately 10–15 min later.
Histological analysis of mouse tissues
Tumor-bearing tissues were fixed in cold 4% PFA. Bone tissue was first decalcified using a sodium citrate solution before processing onto histological slides. Decalcified bones were cut at the midpoint and embedded in paraffin blocks. Fluorescence from serial paraffin sections was monitored via fluorescence microscopy (Leica Microsystems). Tissues were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stain, and images were acquired using a microscope slide scanner (3D-HISTECH Ltd., Budapest, Hungary).
Cytokine profiling
Supernatants from LNCaPVec and LNCaPCD133+ cells and sera from tumor-bearing mice were collected and assayed using a cytokine array kit (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA), according to the manufacturer's instructions. The cytokines examined using this technique are listed in Table I. Cytokines were detected using the ECL detection kit (Amersham) and quantified via densitometric analysis using ImageJ software (Scion Corp, MD, USA).
Reverse transcription-quantitative PCR (qPCR) analysis
Total RNA was extracted from cells using TRIzol® reagent (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). cDNA was synthesized from 2 µg total RNA using the Super-Script II First-Strand Synthesis System (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). mRNA levels were measured via qPCR, and the Gapdh gene was used as an endogenous control. Sequences of the primers used to target various genes are listed in Table II.
Immunohistochemical analysis of bone specimens
Paraffin sections were deparaffinized in three solutions of xylene and rehydrated in a graded series of ethanol solutions. For antigen retrieval, slides were placed in 0.01 M citrate buffer at pH 6.0 and heated in a steamer for 30 min. Endogenous peroxidases were quenched by incubating the samples with 3% hydrogen peroxide for 20 min at room temperature. Sections were incubated overnight at 4°C using a 1:50 dilution of the primary antibody against MIF (Santa-Cruz Biotechnology Inc.). Sections were then incubated for 30 min with a biotinylated secondary antibody (LSAB system HRP kit; DakoCytomation, Glostrup, Denmark), rinsed in PBS, and incubated for 30 min with a streptavidin-peroxidase conjugate (LSAB; DakoCytomation). The reaction was developed for 5 min using 3, 30-diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride (Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA). Slides were counterstained in hematoxylin, dehydrated, and covered with a cover slip. Negative and positive controls were simultaneously analyzed. Positive controls comprised mammary tissues. The slides were captured using a microscope slide scanner (3D-HISTECH Ltd., Budapest, Hungary).
Statistical analysis
One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Sidak's multiple comparison test (unless specifically mentioned otherwise) were used for statistical analyses. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference. Data are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (SD) unless specified otherwise. Data were analyzed using the SPSS v.20.0 software program for Windows (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). GraphPad Prism v.6.00 software program for Windows (GraphPad, La Jolla, CA, USA) was used to analyze data from in vitro and in vivo experiments.
Results
Stable overexpression of CD133 in LNCaP cells
To evaluate the effect of CD133 overexpression in vitro, we established a stable cell line overexpressing CD133 under the control of a constitutive promoter. We transfected LNCaP cells with either CD133 or an empty vector tagged with GFP. A representative CD133 clone was selected from LNCaPCD133+ cells and compared against control cells transfected with the empty vector (LNCaPVec). Transiently transfected 293TVec or 293TCD133+ cells were used as a positive control. Basal expression of CD133 protein in LNCaPVec cells was very low; however, the basal expression of CD133 was high in stable CD133-transfected cells (LNCaPCD133+) and transiently transfected 293T cells (Fig. 1A). Green fluorescence was observed in the cytosol and membrane of LNCaPCD133+ cells (Fig. 1B).
To explore the function of CD133 in cancer stemness, we evaluated the acquisition of CSC properties such as increased ability to form tumor spheres and expression of stem cell markers such as Oct-4, SOX2, and NANOG. The expression levels of Oct-4 and NANOG were significantly elevated in LNCaPCD133+ cells, consistent with the increase in stemness properties (Fig. 1C). Stemness was also confirmed by a colony-formation assay. Colony-forming ability was significantly elevated in LNCaPCD133+ cells, in line with the elevated expression of stemness factors (Fig. 1D). These results suggest that the increase in colony-forming ability and Oct-4 and NANOG expression conferred stem cell-like properties during ectopic overexpression of CD133.
EMT-related properties in CD133-overexpressing LNCaP cells
CD133 overexpression in LNCaP cells, as determined by wound healing and cell invasion assays, induced a significant increase in cell migration and invasion. After 24 h, the artificial wound gaps became significantly narrower in LNCaPCD133+ cells than in LNCaPVec cells (Fig. 2A). Furthermore, the invasive abilities of LNCaPCD133+ cells significantly increased (Fig. 2B). To monitor morphological changes in LNCaP cells, immunofluorescence analysis for F-actin was performed using confocal microscopy. The number of spindle and discontiguous cells observed in the LNCaPCD133+ group was higher than that observed in the LNCaPVec group (Fig. 2C).
To identify factors associated with altered invasiveness and migration caused by ectopic overexpression of CD133, we monitored levels of epithelial and mesenchymal markers in PC cells. Protein expression analyses revealed a slightly lower expression of epithelial marker E-cadherin in LNCaPCD133+ cells than in LNCaPVec cells (Fig. 2D). In contrast, expression of the mesenchymal marker vimentin was significantly upregulated in LNCaPCD133+ cells. Further, analysis of β-catenin-associated signal transduction was carried out via immunoprecipitation in LnCaPCD133+ cells (Fig. 2E). CD133 overexpression led to a significant increase in binding between β-catenin and TCF-4, an EMT-inducing transcriptional factor in cancer cells in compared with LnCaPvec cells as a negative control. These data strongly support the idea that CD133 is essential for increased and decreased expression of vimentin and E-cadherin, respectively, leading to subsequent EMT and metastasis in PC cells.
CD133 promotes LNCaP-induced bone metastasis in vivo
Both of LNCaPVec and LNCaPCD133+ cells were labeled with luciferase, and the cells showed a similar luciferase activities (Fig. 3A). An then we injected LNCaPVec and LNCaPCD133+ cells into the left cardiac ventricle of male nude mice at 0.5×106 cells/mouse. The mice were imaged weekly, starting from week 4 after intracardiac injection. The results of PBS (mock) injection and injection of LNCaPVec and LNCaPCD133+ cells are shown in the whole-mouse image in Fig. 3B. A large hot-spot and a small spot of bioluminescence were observed in the whole body following LNCaPCD133+ cell injection. Only 20% of animals inoculated with LNCaPVec cells developed skeletal tumors (n = 10) as compared with 80% of those inoculated with LNCaPCD133+ cells (Table III).
We performed H&E staining to examine the histological features of skeletal tumors formed by LNCaPVec/LNCaPCD133+ cells inoculated into mice via intracardiac injection. As shown in Fig. 3C, gross examination of excised spines in mice injected with LNCaPVec or LNCaPCD133+ cells showed that the tumor mass occupied the primary spongiosum (trabecular epiphysis) and displaced the bone marrow cells. In particular, an apparent margin between the spinal cord and metastatic tumors was observed in LNCaPVec-inoculated mice. However, metastatic tumors invading the spinal cord and discursive osteolytic features of vertebrae were observed in LNCaPCD133+ cell-inoculated mice. We aimed to identify the secreted molecules that played a critical role in LNCaPCD133+ cell-induced bone metastasis through a cytokine screening using a proteome array cytokine kit (Fig. 3D). CD133 overexpression in LNCaP cells led to a marked increase in the release of interleukin 8 and MIF from mouse serum. MIF expression increased in the supernatants of LNCaPCD133+ cells. These data suggest that ectopic overexpression of CD133 might lead to a significantly increased risk of bone metastatic cancer. Further, increased MIF expression may contribute to PC metastasis in the bone.
Expression of MIF in primary PC and metastatic lesions
To investigate the role of MIF in bone metastasis of LNCaP cells, its mRNA and protein expression levels were analyzed. MIF protein (Fig. 4A) and mRNA (Fig. 4B) levels were higher in LNCaPCD133+ cells than in LNCaPVec cells. To monitor the cellular distribution of MIF in LNCaP cells, MIF immunofluorescence was performed. MIF expression in the membrane and cytosol was higher in LNCaPCD133+ cells than in LNCaPVec cells (Fig. 4C).
In the immunohistochemical study, MIF expression increased around the tumor mass and trabecular epiphysis region of bones inoculated with LNCaPCD133+ cells. These observations suggest that ectopic overexpression of CD133 leads to increased MIF expression in CD133+ cells and activation of bones adjacent to the tumor, particularly in LNCaP cell-injected bones, and that CD133 expression is associated with PC metastasis to the bone.
Discussion
Bone is a common site of distant metastasis in PC. Association of bone and metastatic cancer cells is important in site-specific manifestation of PC (18). There are no curative treatments for the disease at this stage, and bone metastasis remains a devastating complication of advanced PC, despite advances in understanding of mechanisms underlying the basic molecular biology of this process. The existence and identification of CSCs reveal the pivotal roles that these cells play in metastasis (19). In the present study, we identified CSC-like cells following ectopic overexpression of CD133 in the PC cell line LNCaP. This phenomenon gave rise to genetic variation in PC cells and altered expression of several factors related to stemness, including NANOG and Oct-4, resulting in increased colony-forming abilities. Furthermore, genetic modulation of CD133 altered expression of EMT-related factors increased vimentin expression and decreased E-cadherin expression, resulting in the generation of a complex with TCF-4 and β-catenin. Although the role of EMT in PC remains unclear, several factors involved in EMT or related pathways have been identified as key molecules in cancer cell invasion and metastasis. There is the strong correlation between CD133 and EMT factors that may explain the invasiveness and migration of LNCaPCD133+ cells.
Recent studies have shown that EMT may induce differentiation of cancer cells into a CSC-like state. EMT plays a critical role in the process of development and wound healing; however, recent studies have linked EMT with human pathology, including cancer metastasis (20). However, no research has yet revealed the mechanisms underlying this phenomenon or identified the source of cells with both EMT and stem cell properties. In the present study, we show for the first time that PC cells via ectopic overexpression of CD133 may present mesenchymal characteristics and stem cell properties. In addition, LNCaP cells were originated from not bone metastatic PC but lymph node, it confirmed that ectopic overexpression of CD133 in LNCaP led to promote the ability of bone metastasis in the present study. These results imply that CSCs may induce local and distant metastases to the bone by acquiring mesenchymal features, which may greatly facilitate systemic dissemination from the primary mass. Furthermore, the redundant regulation of β-catenin/TCF-4 signaling during tumor metastasis through several EMT-inducing signals suggests that this expression is critical in the initiation and maintenance of EMT. According to recent studies, the microenvironment at the invasive front of cancer cells, especially secretion of factors such as hepatocyte growth factor by stromal myofibroblasts near dedifferentiated cancer cells, plays a key role in the nuclear translocation of β-catenin and activation of β-catenin/TCF-4 signaling (16).
We explored factors that play a critical role in CD133+ PC cell-induced bone metastasis. LNCaPVec and LNCaPCD133+ cells were inoculated into athymic nude mice via intracardiac injection, and showed an osteolytic bone metastasis with a similar result of previous study (21). And then, secreted cytokines with paracrine and endocrine actions were evaluated using mouse serum in array kits. Histological analysis revealed that CD133+ cells generated larger and more aggressive tumors than their wild-type counterparts, while LNCaPCD133+ cells showed higher expression of MIF than LNCaPVec cells. Moreover, MIF is a pleiotropic inflammatory cytokine with chemokine-like functions and may bind and signal via several receptors, including CD74, C-X-C motif chemokine receptor 2 (CXCR2), and CXCR4. MIF may play a central role in bone metastasis of PC and perform critical biological functions (22). MIF is known to induce osteoclast differentiation and contribute to the progression of various bone and periodontal diseases (23). A previous study has shown that binding of both MIF and stromal cell-derived factor 1 chemokines to CXCR4 may trigger chemotaxis of osteoclast precursors and enhance osteoclastogenesis (24). The interaction of MIF with chemokine receptors may explain its ability to induce macrophage migration and osteoclastogenesis. Our current findings support the conclusion that while a physiological target is yet unidentified, tautomerase activity is important for MIF functionality and may contribute to tumor growth and metastasis. Tropism of LNCaPCD133+ cells to bone suggests that CSCs may preferentially interact with specific cells in the bone microenvironment, and the most likely candidates are osteoclasts that cause an increase in bone lysis at sites of bone metastases, as demonstrated by histomorphometric evidence.
With respect to clinical applications, CD133 may serve as a candidate marker to detect bone metastasis risk in patients with PC. The inability to predict development of metastatic disease in patients is a major challenge in PC management and has resulted in excessive therapy in some patients and delayed or insufficient therapy in others (25). The nature of the association between circulating tumor cells and bone metastasis remains controversial. The presence of circulating PC cells in the blood is an indication of dissemination of tumor cells from the primary site. Only a subset of circulating tumor cells may possess the necessary properties to target bone.
In light of the significant progress in the field of metastasis and stem cell research, we suggest a CSC-based model for bone metastasis in PC. CD133 regulates CSC and EMT properties in PC and sustains acquisition of osteolytic features through MIF secretion. These data demonstrate the role of EMT and CSCs in cancer metastasis to the bone. Thus, our findings may facilitate development of a novel classification system and therapeutic strategies for bone metastasis.
Acknowledgements
Not applicable.
Funding
The present study was supported by the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea, funded by the Ministry of Education (grant no. 2017R1D1A1A02018589), and by the Clinical Medicine Research Institute of the Chosun University Hospital (2015).
Availability of data and materials
All data generated or analyzed during the present study are included in this published article.
Authors' contributions
HS, BK, MP, YKo, YM, BJ, JS, YKi and WL take responsibility for the integrity of the data analysis. HS, BK, MP, YKo, YM, BJ and WL performed the experiments. HS and BK reviewed, analyzed, and interpreted the data. JS and YKi performed additional experiments. HS, BK and WL wrote the paper. All authors discussed the results and commented on the manuscript.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
All experimental procedures involving animals were performed in compliance with institutional and governmental requirements and were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (approval no. CIACUC2015-A0032), Chosun University, Gwangju, Korea.
Patient consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Glossary
Abbreviations
Abbreviations:
PC |
prostate cancer |
MIF |
macrophage migration inhibitory factor |
CSC |
cancer stem cell |
EMT |
epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition |
TCF-4 |
anti-transcription factor 4 |
References
Hassanipour-Azgomi S, Mohammadian-Hafshejani A, Ghoncheh M, Towhidi F, Jamehshorani S and Salehiniya H: Incidence and mortality of prostate cancer and their relationship with the Human Development Index worldwide. Prostate Int. 4:118–124. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Jemal A, Siegel R, Xu J and Ward E: Cancer statistics, 2010. CA Cancer J Clin. 60:277–300. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Jin JK, Dayyani F and Gallick GE: Steps in prostate cancer progression that lead to bone metastasis. Int J Cancer. 128:2545–2561. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Nakazawa M and Kyprianou N: Epithelial-mesenchymal-transition regulators in prostate cancer: Androgens and beyond. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 166:84–90. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Chen YS, Wu MJ, Huang CY, Lin SC, Chuang TH, Yu CC and Lo JF: CD133/Src axis mediates tumor initiating property and epithelial-mesenchymal transition of head and neck cancer. PLoS One. 6:e280532011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Al-Hajj M, Wicha MS, Benito-Hernandez A, Morrison SJ and Clarke MF: Prospective identification of tumorigenic breast cancer cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 100:3983–3988. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Shiozawa Y, Berry JE, Eber MR, Jung Y, Yumoto K, Cackowski FC, Yoon HJ, Parsana P, Mehra R, Wang J, et al: The marrow niche controls the cancer stem cell phenotype of disseminated prostate cancer. Oncotarget. 7:41217–41232. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Klonisch T, Wiechec E, Hombach-Klonisch S, Ande SR, Wesselborg S, Schulze-Osthoff K and Los M: Cancer stem cell markers in common cancers-therapeutic implications. Trends Mol Med. 14:450–460. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Yu C, Yao Z, Jiang Y and Keller ET: Prostate cancer stem cell biology. Minerva Urol Nefrol. 64:19–33. 2012.PubMed/NCBI | |
Kryczek I, Liu S, Roh M, Vatan L, Szeliga W, Wei S, Banerjee M, Mao Y, Kotarski J, Wicha MS, et al: Expression of aldehyde dehydrogenase and CD133 defines ovarian cancer stem cells. Int J Cancer. 130:29–39. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Colombel M, Eaton CL, Hamdy F, Ricci E, van der Pluijm G, Cecchini M, Mege-Lechevallier F, Clezardin P and Thalmann G: Increased expression of putative cancer stem cell markers in primary prostate cancer is associated with progression of bone metastases. Prostate. 72:713–720. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Shmelkov SV, St Clair R, Lyden D and Rafii S: AC133/CD133/Prominin-1. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 37:715–719. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Major AG, Pitty LP and Farah CS: Cancer stem cell markers in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Stem Cells Int. 2013:3194892013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Collins AT, Berry PA, Hyde C, Stower MJ and Maitland NJ: Prospective identification of tumorigenic prostate cancer stem cells. Cancer Res. 65:10946–10951. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Moon Y, Kim D, Sohn H and Lim W: Effect of CD133 overexpression on the epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition in oral cancer cell lines. Clin Exp Metastasis. 33:487–496. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Sanchez-Tillo E, de Barrios O, Siles L, Cuatrecasas M, Castells A and Postigo A: β-catenin/TCF4 complex induces the epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT)-activator ZEB1 to regulate tumor invasiveness. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 108:19204–19209. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Arguello F, Baggs RB and Frantz CN: A murine model of experimental metastasis to bone and bone marrow. Cancer Res. 48:6876–6881. 1988.PubMed/NCBI | |
Valta MP, Tuomela J, Bjartell A, Valve E, Väänänen HK and Härkönen P: FGF-8 is involved in bone metastasis of prostate cancer. Int J Cancer. 123:22–31. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Lee KH, Ahn EJ, Oh SJ, Kim O, Joo YE, Bae JA, Yoon S, Ryu HH, Jung S and Kim KK: KITENIN promotes glioma invasiveness and progression, associated with the induction of EMT and stemness markers. Oncotarget. 6:3240–3253. 2015.PubMed/NCBI | |
Xu MH, Gao X, Luo D, Zhou XD, Xiong W and Liu GX: EMT and acquisition of stem cell-like properties are involved in spontaneous formation of tumorigenic hybrids between lung cancer and bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells. PLoS One. 9:e878932014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Dai J, Hensel J, Wang N, Kruithof-de Julio M and Shiozawa Y: Mouse models for studying prostate cancer bone metastasis. Bonekey Rep. 5:7772016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Pasqualon T, Lue H, Groening S, Pruessmeyer J, Jahr H, Denecke B, Bernhagen J and Ludwig A: Cell surface syndecan-1 contributes to binding and function of macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) on epithelial tumor cells. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1863:717–726. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Madeira MF, Queiroz-Junior CM, Costa GM, Santos PC, Silveira EM, Garlet GP, Cisalpino PS, Teixeira MM, Silva TA and Souza Dda G: MIF induces osteoclast differentiation and contributes to progression of periodontal disease in mice. Microbes Infect. 14:198–206. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Movila A, Ishii T, Albassam A, Wisitrasameewong W, Howait M, Yamaguchi T, Ruiz-Torruella M, Bahammam L, Nishimura K, Van Dyke T and Kawai T: Macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) supports homing of osteoclast precursors to peripheral osteolytic lesions. J Bone Miner Res. 31:1688–1700. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Chu K, Cheng CJ, Ye X, Lee YC, Zurita AJ, Chen DT, Yu-Lee LY, Zhang S, Yeh ET, Hu MC, et al: Cadherin-11 promotes the metastasis of prostate cancer cells to bone. Mol Cancer Res. 6:1259–1267. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI |