Programmed death‑ligand 1 expression is an unfavorable prognostic factor of hepatocellular carcinoma after archiving sustained virologic response for hepatitis C virus infection

  • Authors:
    • Reiichiro Kondo
    • Jun Akiba
    • Sachiko Ogasawara
    • Osamu Nakashima
    • Yoshiki Naito
    • Hironori Kusano
    • Yutaro Mihara
    • Masahiko Tanigawa
    • Hirohisa Yano
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: June 7, 2019     https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2019.10448
  • Pages: 1458-1466
Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

The aim of the present study was to study the pathological prognostic factor of initial hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after archiving sustained virologic response (SVR) for hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. A single‑center retrospective analysis was performed for patients who underwent hepatectomy between 2003 and 2017. We studied clinico‑pathological findings of resected liver tissues in 35 patients with HCC after SVR treated by interferon (IFN group) and 13 patients with HCC after SVR treated by direct acting antivirals (DAA group). We also performed immunohistochemical staining using antibodies against programmed death‑ligand 1 (PD‑L1), cytokeratin 19, epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM) and regulator of G‑protein signaling 5 (RGS5). PD‑L1 positive HCC was observed in 6 cases of the IFN group and 4 cases of the DAA group. In the IFN group, in univariate analysis of recurrence free survival after surgery (RFS), the PD‑L1 expression had a statistically significant impact (HR=6.01; P=0.02). In the multivariate analysis of RFS, PD‑L1 expression significantly remained (HR=5.01; P=0.03). For both RFS and overall survival, Kaplan‑Meier curves confirmed that patients with PD‑L1 expression showed significantly worse prognosis (log‑rank test P<0.01). Nuclear grade, RGS5 expression, and EpCAM expression were significantly higher in the PD‑L1‑positive HCC group compared with the PD‑L1‑negative HCC group (P<0.05). Therefore, PD‑L1 expression may be an independent prognostic factor of surgically resected HCC after achieving SVR.

Introduction

Sustained virological response (SVR) is defined as undetectable serum hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA 24 weeks after completion of antiviral therapy for chronic HCV infection. In the 1990's to the 2000's, Interferon (IFN) was used as the main antiviral therapy for HCV infection. About 50% of patients with HCV genotype type 1 have a SVR using peginterferon alfa-2a plus ribavirin (1). Recently, the development of an IFN-free regimen using direct acting antivirals (DAA) has been a revolution in the treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis C. More than 95% of patients achieved a SVR using DAA (2,3).

HCV infection is a significant risk factor for progressive hepatic fibrosis, subsequent liver cirrhosis and the development of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Among HCV-infected patients, achieving SVR was associated with a reduced risk of the development of HCC (4). However, the risk of developing HCC does not completely disappear even after SVR. It was reported that the 5- and 10-year HCC incidence rates after achieving SVR by IFN-based therapy were 0.8–5.8% and 2.8–11.1%, respectively (510). There were differences in gene mutation between patients who developed HCC after achieving SVR and patients who developed HCC with chronic HCV infection (10,11). Many HCV-infected patients will be able to obtain SVR, so identification of biological characteristics in HCC after achieving SVR is very important. However, the molecular biological feature of HCC after achieving SVR was not yet clear.

In the present study, we aimed at characterizing molecular pathological feature of surgically resected HCC after achieving SVR and determining its relationship with prognosis and pathological features, as well as programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression, markers of progenitor cells [cytokeratin 19 (CK19), epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM)], and portal vein invasion associated marker [regulator of G-protein signaling 5 (RGS5)].

Patients and methods

Patients

We studied the clinical and pathological findings of 372 patients associated HCV infection who were underwent hepatectomy for initial HCC at Kurume University Hospital between January 2003 and April 2017. Of these, 48 patients who developed initial HCC after achieving SVR. In 48 patients, there are 35 patients with HCC after SVR treated by IFN (IFN group) and 13 patients with HCC after SVR treated by DAA (DAA group). They were underwent hepatectomy for initial HCC at the Kurume University Hospital between January 2003 and April 2017.

Histopathological examination

Each surgically resected liver tissue was fixed with 10% formalin, embedded in paraffin, cut into 5-μm sections, and then used for histological analyses. The specimens were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E), reticulin, and Azan. We evaluated all specimens, histopathologically (e.g., HCC tissue: Size, tumor differentiation, vascular invasion, nuclear grade; non-HCC liver tissue: Fibrosis, inflammation, steatosis). The histological features of HCC were evaluated according to the World Health Organization classification (12). We classified the degree of nuclear grade into 3 levels according to nuclear atypia and mitosis (Table I). The degrees of liver fibrosis and hepatic inflammation were scored according to the New Inuyama Classification from F0 to F4, and A0 to A3 (13). The liver fibrosis stage was classified as follows: F0 (no fibrosis), F1 (fibrous portal expansion), F2 (bridging fibrosis), F3 (bridging fibrosis with lobular distortion) and F4 (liver cirrhosis), and the inflammatory grade was classified as A0 (no necro-inflammatory reaction), A1 (mild necro-inflammatory reaction), A2 (moderate necro-inflammatory reaction), or A3 (severe necro-inflammatory reaction) (13). Steatosis was defined as fat deposits of 5% or more hepatocytes. Histopathological diagnosis and classification were performed by three pathologists (R.K, J.A, and O.N).

Table I.

Assessment of nuclear grade.

Table I.

Assessment of nuclear grade.

A, Nuclear grade

Grade/ScoreResult
Grade 3Atypia score + Mitosis score =5 or 6
Grade 2Atypia score + Mitosis score =4
Grade 1Atypia score + Mitosis score =2 or 3

B, Nuclear atypia score

Grade/ScoreResult

Score 3Multinucleated and pleomorphic cells
Score 2Other than score 1 and 3
Score 1Homogenous small round nuclear cells

C, Mitosis

Grade/ScoreResult

Score 3>10 mitotic cells/10 HPFs
Score 25–10 mitotic cells/10 HPFs
Score 1<5 mitotic cells/10 HPFs

[i] HPF, high power field.

Immunohistochemical analysis

Immunostaining was performed on paraffin-embedded materials. The following primary antibodies were used: Anti-PD-L1 (clone 28-8; Dako; Agilent Technologies, Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA), anti-CK19 (clone RCK108; Dako; Agilent Technologies, Inc.), anti-EpCAM (clone VU1D9; Cell Signaling Technology, Inc., Danvers, MA, USA), and anti-RGS5 (clone 1C1; Novus Biologicals, LLC, Littleton, CO, USA). Immunohistochemical examination of PD-L1 was performed using a fully automated DAKO system (Dako; Agilent Technologies, Inc.), according to the manufacturer's instructions. PD-L1 expression was observed in both neoplastic HCC cells and intratumoral inflammatory cells. For neoplastic HCC cells, the percentage of cells displaying unequivocal membranous staining was recorded. Immunohistochemical examination of CK19 and EpCAM were processed on an automated immunostainer (BenchMark ULTRA; Ventana Automated Systems, Inc., Tucson, AZ, USA), according to the manufacturer's instructions. Immunohistochemical examination of RGS5 was performed according to our previous report (14). The positive expression in tumor cells was shown in Fig. 1. The expression of tumor cells were scored as follows: No expression, score 0; 1 to 4% of positive cells, score 1+; more than 5% of positive cells, score 2+. In addition, we performed double immunostaining for CD34 and α-smooth muscle actin (αSMA). We used monoclonal antibodies against CD34 (mouse, clone QBEnd/10, 1:100; Leica Biosystems, Newcastle, United Kingdom) and αSMA (mouse, clone 1A4, 1:10; Dako; Agilent Technologies, Inc.). The primary antibody for CD34 labeled horseradish peroxidase was visualized using DAB resulting in a brown/black target signal. The second antibody for αSMA labeled alkaline phosphatase was visualized using Fast Red/Naphthol resulting in a bright red target signal. The CD34 and αSMA expression in sinusoidal mesenchymal cells was scored as follows: No positive sinusoidal mesenchymal cells, 0; positive sinusoidal mesenchymal cells in less than four fields under low power magnification (×4 objective), score 1+; positive sinusoidal mesenchymal cells in five or more fields under low power magnification (×4 objective), score 2+. In chronic liver disease, perisinusoidal mesenchymal cells express CD34 as transformed hepatic endothelial cells (HECs) and perisinusoidal mesenchymal cells express αSMA as transformed hepatic stellate cells (HSCs). The positive expression of perisinusoidal mesenchymal cells in non-cancerous liver tissue was shown in Fig. 1.

Statistical analysis

All data are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (SD). Comparisons between 2 groups were performed using Welch's t-test for continuous variables, and the χ2 test for discrete variables. Kaplan-Meier survival and tumor recurrence analyses were performed using the log-rank test. Multivariate analyses were performed using linear and logistic regressions. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference. Statistical analysis was performed using JMP software package (v.13.0; SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC, USA).

Results

Pathological findings

The clinicopathological findings in the IFN group and the DAA group are shown in Table II. In all cases, there were solitary HCC without hepatic vein invasion, hepatic artery invasion, bile duct invasion, peritoneal dissemination, and lymph node metastasis. Surgical margin was negative in all cases.

Table II.

Summary of patients.

Table II.

Summary of patients.

A, Clinical findings

CharacteristicsIFN (n=35)DAA (n=13)P-value
Age (year)68.8±868.1±7.40.76
Male/Female24/115/80.1
Diabetes (prevalence rate, %)11 (31%)7 (54%)0.32
Observation period after resection (median)1,080 days501 days<0.01
Serum total bililubin (mg/dl)0.8±0.30.7±0.30.12
Prothrombin activity (%)90.1±1592.7±120.54
Serum albumin (g/dl)4.2±0.34.2±0.20.86
Serum AFP (ng/ml, median)6.76.40.11
Serum PIVKA (mAU/ml, median)118320.93

B, HCC findings

CharacteristicsIFN (n=35)DAA (n=13)P-value

Tumor size (mm)29±1919±4<0.01
Tumor differentiation (well/moderate/poor)2/30/33/9/10.23
Nuclear grade2±0.91.9±0.90.79
Atypia score2.3±0.52.5±0.50.39
Mitosis score1.7±0.81.7±0.90.85
Portal vein invasion (prevalence rate, %)21 (60%)5 (38%)0.21
PD-L1 score (0/1+/2+)29/3/39/3/10.55
CK19 score (0/1+/2+)35/0/012/1/00.34
EpCAM score (0/1+/2+)29/4/29/2/20.33
RGS5 score (0/1+/2+)6/22/75/7/10.11

C, Non-HCC findings

CharacteristicsIFN (n=35)DAA (n=13)P-value

Fibrosis (New Inuyama Classification, F)2.3±1.33.5±1<0.01
Inflammation (New Inuyama Classification, A)1.2±0.51.3±0.50.65
Steatosis (prevalence rate, %)9 (26%)6 (46%)0.29
CD34 score (0/1+/2+)0/4/310/2/110.74
αSMA score (0/1+/2+)18/9/83/6/40.16

[i] AFP, α-fetoprotein; αSMA, α-smooth muscle actin; CK19, cytokeratin 19; EpCAM, epithelial cell adhesion molecule; PD-L1, programmed death-ligand 1; PIVKA, protein induced by vitamin K absence or antagonist-II; RGS5, regulator of G- protein signaling 5.

In the IFN group, there were 24 men and 11 women. The mean age was 68.8±8 years. Diabetes was present in 11 (31%) patients of the IFN group, respectively. Histologically, among the HCC tissues in the IFN group, 2 cases were well differentiated HCCs, 30 cases were moderately differentiated HCCs, and 3 case was poorly differentiated HCC. The mean tumor size and nuclear grade were 29±19 mm and 2±0.9, respectively. Portal vein invasion was present in 21 cases (60%). In non-HCC tissues of the IFN group, the degree of hepatic inflammation (A) was 1.2±0.5, and the degree of liver fibrosis (F) was 2.3±1.3. Between the IFN group and the DAA group, there were significant differences in the observation period after resection, the tumor size, and the degree of liver fibrosis.

In non-cancerous liver tissues of both IFN group and DAA group, mixed with progressive fibrosis and regressive fibrosis were observed. The progressive fibrosis defined as fibroseptal stroma showing wide/broad, loosely aggregated collagen fibers, which are moderately to markedly cellular containing, variably, inflammatory cells, and ductular reactions (Fig. 2A-C) (15). The regressive fibrosis defined as fibroseptal stroma showing thin, densely compacted stroma, which are largely acellular (Fig. 2D-F) (15). Two patients (6%) of the IFN group and 2 patients (18%) of the DAA group were identified as having non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH)-like pathological features, such as steatosis, ballooning hepatocytes and Mallory-Denk bodies.

Immunohistochemically, PD-L1 positive reaction was found inside the tumor not interface of the tumor. In the IFN group, 3, 3, and 29 cases showed a PD-L1 Score of 2+, 1+, and 0, respectively. All cases were negative for CK19. Two, 4, and 29 cases showed an EpCAM Score of 2+, 1+, and 0, respectively. In the DAA, 1, 3, and 9 cases showed a PD-L1 Score of 2+, 1+, and 0, respectively. In the IFN group, CD34 and αSMA expression in sinusoidal mesenchymal cells were present in 35 (100%) and 17 (49%) patients, respectively. The CD34 expressions in sinusoidal mesenchymal cells were observed in the periportal area with regionality (Rappaport zone 1 to zone 2). The αSMA expression area was close to the CD34 expression area (Fig. 1).

PD-L1 expression and pathological findings

The clinicopathological findings of the PD-L1-positive HCC and the PD-L1-negative HCC are shown in Table III. In the HCC tissues, mitosis was more frequently observed in the PD-L1-positive HCC than in the PD-L1-negative HCC (P<0.01). The Nuclear grade was higher in the PD-L1-positive HCC than in the PD-L1-negative HCC (P<0.01). RGS5 and EpCAM expression levels were higher in the PD-L1 positive-HCC than that in the PD-L1-negative HCC (P<0.05). In the non-cancerous liver tissues, the degree of liver fibrosis was higher in the patients with PD-L1-positive HCC than in those with PD-L1-negative HCC.

Table III.

Clinicopathological findings of PD-L1 positive HCC.

Table III.

Clinicopathological findings of PD-L1 positive HCC.

A, Clinical findings

PD-L1 expression of HCC

CharacteristicsPositive (n=10)Negative (n=38)P-value
Age (year)71±868.3±8.10.69
Male/Female4/625/130.16
IFN/DAA6/429/90.43
Diabetes (prevalence rate, %)1 (10%)17 (45%)0.06
Serum total bililubin (mg/dl)0.8±0.30.9±0.20.21
Prothrombin activity (%)85.9±10.892.2±14.70.15
Serum albumin (g/dl)4.1±0.384.2±0.290.41
Serum AFP (ng/ml, median)844.50.46
Serum PIVKA (mAU/ml, median)631000.11

B, HCC findings

PD-L1 expression of HCC

CharacteristicsPositive (n=10)Negative (n=38)P-value

Tumor size (mm)26±1426±170.92
Tumor differentiation (well/moderate/poor)0/8/25/31/20.06
Nuclear grade2.7±0.51.8±0.8<0.01
Atypia score2.6±0.52.3±0.50.11
Mitosis score   2.5±0.71.5±0.7<0.01
Portal vein invasion (prevalence rate, %)5 (50%)21 (55%)  1
CK19 score (0/1+/2+)9/1/038/0/00.34
EpCAM score (0/1+/2+)5/3/233/3/20.04
RGS5 score (0/1+/2+)0/6/411/23/4<0.01

C, Non-HCC findings

PD-L1 expression of HCC

CharacteristicsPositive (n=10)Negative (n=38)P-value

Fibrosis (New Inuyama Classification, F)3.3±0.92.4±1.30.03
Inflammation (New Inuyama Classification, A)1.5±0.51.2±0.50.11
Steatosis (prevalence rate, %)5 (50%)10 (26%)0.24
CD34 score (0/1+/2+)0/1/90/5/330.79
αSMA score (0/1+/2+)3/4/318/11/90.43

[i] AFP, α-fetoprotein; αSMA, α-smooth muscle actin; CK19, cytokeratin 19; EpCAM, epithelial cell adhesion molecule; DAA, direct acting antivirals; HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; IFN, interferon; PD-L1, programmed death-ligand 1; PIVKA, protein induced by vitamin K absence or antagonist-II; RGS5, regulator of G- protein signaling 5.

Univariate and multivariate analysis for prognosis

The observation period after resection was longer in the IFN group than in the DAA group (P<0.01). In the IFN group, univariate analysis for recurrence free survival after surgery (RFS) revealed that PD-L1 expression was significant predictor for recurrence (positive vs. negative; HR=6.01, 95% CI=1.45–23.3, P=0.02) (Table IV). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that PD-L1 expression was an independent poor prognostic factor for recurrence in the IFN group (positive vs. negative; HR=5.01, 95% CI=1.14–21.08, P=0.03) (Table IV). In the DAA group, there were not significant prognostic factors by univariate and multivariate analyzes.

Table IV.

Univariate and multivariate analysis for recurrence free survival in IFN group.

Table IV.

Univariate and multivariate analysis for recurrence free survival in IFN group.

A, Clinical findings

Univariate analysisMultivariate analysis


CharacteristicsHR (95% CI)P-valueHR (95% CI)P-value
Age (>70 years)3.96 (1.23–13.16)0.023.07 (0.79–11.27)0.1
Male1.31 (0.51–3.79)0.59
Diabetes0.37 (0.06–1.37)0.15
Serum T. Bililubin (>0.8 mg/dl)1.14 (0.44–2.95)0.78
Prothrombin activity (<90%)1.67 (0.59–4.53)0.32
Serum albumin (<4.2 g/dl)0.92 (0.34–2.4)0.87
Serum AFP (>6.7 ng/ml)1.46 (0.55–3.93)0.44
Serum PIVKA (>118 mAU/ml)1.21 (0.46–3.09)0.69

B, HCC findings
Univariate analysisMultivariate analysis


CharacteristicsHR (95% CI)P-valueHR (95% CI)P-value

Tumor size (>30 mm)1.72 (0.54–4.8)0.34
Poor differentiation5.78 (0.83–26.96)0.072.95 (0.39–16.19)0.26
Nuclear grade (>grade 2)1.61 (0.62–4.69)0.34
Portal vein invasion1.57 (0.61–4.31)0.34
PD-L1 positive6.01 (1.45–23.3)0.025.01 (1.14–21.08)0.03
CK19 or/and EpCAM positiveUnparsable
RGS5 positive3.46 (0.7–62.57)0.15

C, Non-HCC findings

Univariate analysisMultivariate analysis


CharacteristicsHR (95% CI)P-valueHR (95% CI)P-value

Liver fibrosis (>F3)0.92 (0.35–2.35)0.86
Hepatic inflammation (>A2)0.68 (0.15–2.13)0.53
Liver steatosis0.52 (0.14–1.5)0.24
CD34 expression (>score 2+)3.13 (0.63–56.68)0.19
αSMA positive (>score 2+)2.21 (0.82–5.75)0.11

[i] AFP, α-fetoprotein; αSMA, α-smooth muscle actin; CI, confidence interval; CK19, cytokeratin 19; EpCAM, epithelial cell adhesion molecule; HR, Hazard ratio; IFN, interferon; PD-L1, programmed death-ligand 1; PIVKA, protein induced by vitamin K absence or antagonist-II; RGS5, regulator of G- protein signaling 5; T. Bililubin, total bililubin.

The survival curves

In the IFN group, the Kaplan-Meier curves demonstrate that both RFS and overall survival time were significantly shorter for the PD-L1-positive HCC, compared with the PD-L1-negative HCC (log-rank test P<0.01; Fig. 3).

Discussion

We studied the molecular pathological characteristics of patients who developed initial HCC after achieving SVR. The increasing understanding of HCC biology is necessary for future targeted therapies and personalized care.

We demonstrated that PD-L1 expression was an independent unfavorable prognostic factor of surgically-resected HCC after archiving SVR treated by IFN. Recent studies have demonstrated that PD-L1 positive HCC display biological and pathological markers of aggressiveness (e.g., high serum AFP levels, poor differentiation, and vascular invasion) (16). PD-L1, the major ligand for PD-1, plays a crucial role in PD-1-dependent immune suppression, which is mediated by an antigen-specific T-cell response. PD-L1 expression might contribute to aggressive behavior by blocking antitumor immunity, but the specific details remain unclear. There is very limited information on the expression of PD-L1 in HCC (16,17), and its relationship with the clinical and histopathological features remains unknown. In our study, PD-L1 positive HCC also display biological and pathological markers of aggressiveness (e.g., high mitotic activity, RGS5 expression, and EpCAM expression). RGS5 is a member of the RGS protein family and RGS proteins act GTPase-activating proteins for heterotrimeric G protein α subunit, negatively regulating G-protein signaling. With regard to RGS5 and HCC, RGS5 expression has been demonstrated to enhanced portal vein invasion (14,18). Tsujikawa et al (19), reported that immunohistochemical molecular analysis revealed B/S group expressing CK19, SALL4, and EpCAM shows frequent portal vein invasion, high Ki67 labeling index, and worse prognosis. HCCs with TP53 mutation are more proliferative and aggressive and show CK19 and EpCAM expressions, frequent microvascular invasion, and poor survival (20,21). Our data suggest that PD-L1 positive HCC may have higher malignant potential. The timing of PD-L1 positivity initiation is not clear. However, the PD-L1 positive reaction was observed in 0% (none of 5 cases) of well differentiated HCC, 21% (8 cases of 39 cases) of moderately differentiated HCC, and 50% (2 cases of 4 cases) in poorly differentiated HCC. According to these our results, we considered that the PD-L1 positivity initiation of HCC may be occurred during dedifferentiation process.

It has been reported that both hepatic inflammation and fibrosis are reversible and decrease after achieving SVR by IFN-based therapy. George et al (22), reported on 49 patients with HCV infection who had undergone liver biopsy before treatment and 4-years after achieving SVR by IFN-based therapy. Forty of these patients (82%) showed a decrease in fibrosis score, and 45 (92%) showed a decrease in inflammation score. Ten patients (20%) had healthy or nearly healthy livers on long-term follow-up biopsy. In this study, uncertain mixed both progressive fibrosis and regressive fibrosis were observed in non-cancerous liver tissues of patients with HCC after achieving SVR. Recently, regressive fibrosis in chronic hepatitis B has been reported (15). Predominately regressive was defined as most (more than 50%) fibroseptal stroma in the liver biopsy specimens showing features of thin, densely compacted stroma, largely darkly staining on trichrome, which are largely acellular (15). It has been reported that serum levels of Wisteria floribunda agglutinin-positive human Mac-2 binding protein glycosylation isomer (M2BPGi) can be used to predict the development of HCC in patients with HCV SVR (23). M2BPGi is a serum marker of liver fibrosis that indicates the extent of liver fibrosis in patients with chronic liver disease. Bekki et al (24), reported that M2BP is secreted by activated HSCs. Liver fibrosis that does not decrease sufficiently after achieving SVR may be an important contributory factor to liver carcinogenesis in the patients after achieving SVR. However, in this study, the liver fibrosis was not associated with a poor prognosis in surgically resected HCC after archiving SVR.

In this study, the degree of inflammation and fibrosis was higher in the DAA group than those in the IFN group. In Japan, the IFN therapy cannot be used as an anti-HCV treatment for cirrhotic patients. On the other hand, the DAA therapy can be used as an anti-HCV treatment for cirrhotic patients. Advanced liver fibrosis cases were seen in the patients with achieving SVR treated by DAA more frequently than in the patients with achieving SVR treated by IFN. Besides, the observation period of the DAA group was shorter than those of the IFN group because DAA was new drug developed in 2011. Advanced liver fibrosis cases should require clinical follow-up even after achieving SVR.

Immunohistochemically, in patients developed HCC after achieving SVR, expression of CD34 and αSMA in sinusoidal mesenchymal cells of non-cancerous liver tissue were frequently observed. In chronic liver disease, hepatic fibrosis starts with the stimulation of HSCs. Activated HSCs transform into myofibroblasts and increase of the extracellular matrix. As a result, capillarization of the hepatic sinusoidal endothelial cells (HECs) occurs (25). αSMA is frequently used as a marker of activated and myofibroblast-like HSCs (26). Capillarized sinusoids are lined by a continuous endothelial lining surrounded by a complete basement membrane (27). Immunophenotyping studies of human HECs have demonstrated that HECs of healthy livers are characterized by the expression of the CD32 and CD16 for the Fc fragment of IgG, but lack CD34 (28). In liver cirrhosis, HECs of capillarized sinusoids displayed changes in the positive expression of the CD34 (29). It has been reported that capillarized sinusoids contribute to sinusoidal portal hypertension in liver cirrhosis (30). In capillarized sinusoids, metabolism between the blood circulation and hepatocytes is impaired, because the continuous endothelial lining is surrounded by a complete basement membrane. Further molecular biological study of sinusoidal capillarization and activation of HSCs after achieving SVR will contribute to improving the treatment of fibrosis after achieving SVR.

The current study has several limitations. First, this was a retrospective study. Second, while the statistical signification of this study was sufficient, the number of cases was relatively small. Third, we were not able to investigate the relationship of PD-L1 with prognosis of the DAA group enough, because the sample size was small and the observation period after resection was very short. These may affect the statistical results. We tried to add the samples in the DAA group, but we cannot add the samples because DAA was new drug developed in 2011. Further prospective studies with larger numbers of patients and long observation period is needed to confirm the results of this study.

In conclusion, we found that PD-L1 expression was associated with a poor prognosis in surgically resected HCC after archiving SVR. We considered that PD-L1 positive HCC had blocking antitumor immunity but also high mitotic activity. In addition, we demonstrated liver fibrosis in non-cancerous liver tissues of patients with HCC after achieving SVR. We consider that advanced liver fibrosis may be a contributory factor of liver carcinogenesis after achieving SVR. The mechanism of fibrosis and fibrinolysis in the liver tissue after achieving SVR is not clearly. Further molecular biological study of sinusoidal capillarization, i.e., CD34 expression, and activation of HSCs, i.e., CD34 expression, after achieving SVR is necessary. These may associate with hepatic fibrosis after achieving SVR.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Ms A Tanaka (Kurume University School of Medicine) and Ms S Maeda (Kurume University School of Medicine) for their technical assistance.

Funding

The present study was supported by Japan Society for the Promotion of Science KAKENHI (grant nos. 16K19094 and 18K15105).

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed during the present study are included in this published article.

Authors' contributions

RK, JA, ON and HY designed the research. RK, SO, YN, HK, YM and MT performed the research. RK analyzed the data and wrote the paper. HY and JA critically revised the manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The present study was approved by the Ethical Committee at Kurume University (approval no. 16060). The Ethical Committee waived the requirement for written informed consent for the cases as the data for these patients were retrospectively analyzed.

Patient consent for publication

Written informed consent was obtained from all participants for the publication of any data or associated images.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

1 

Fried MW, Shiffman ML, Reddy KR, Smith C, Marinos G, Gonçales FL Jr, Häussinger D, Diago M, Carosi G, Dhumeaux D, et al: Peginterferon alfa-2a plus ribavirin for chronic hepatitis C virus infection. N Engl J Med. 347:975–982. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

2 

Mizokami M, Yokosuka O, Takehara T, Sakamoto N, Korenaga M, Mochizuki H, Nakane K, Enomoto H, Ikeda F, Yanase M, et al: Ledipasvir and sofosbuvir fixed-dose combination with and without ribavirin for 12 weeks in treatment-naive and previously treated Japanese patients with genotype1 hepatitis C: An open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Infect Dis. 15:645–653. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

3 

Kumada H, Suzuki Y, Ikeda K, Toyota J, Karino Y, Chayama K, Kawakami Y, Ido A, Yamamoto K, Takaguchi K, et al: Daclatasvir plus Asunaprevir for chronic HCV Genotype1b infection. Hepatology. 59:2083–2091. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

4 

Morgan RL, Baack B, Smith BD, Yartel A, Pitasi M and Falck-Ytter Y: Eradication of hepatitis C virus infection and the development of hepatocellular carcinoma: A meta-analysis of observational studies. Ann Intern Med. 158:329–337. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

5 

Arase Y, Kobayashi M, Suzuki F, Suzuki Y, Kawamura Y, Akuta N, Kobayashi M, Sezaki H, Saito S, Hosaka T, et al: Effect of type 2 diabetes on risk for malignancies includes hepatocellular carcinoma in chronic hepatitis C. Hepatology. 57:964–973. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

6 

Oze T, Hiramatsu N, Yakushijin T, Miyazaki M, Yamada A, Oshita M, Hagiwara H, Mita E, Ito T, Fukui H, et al: Post-treatment levels of α-fetoprotein predict incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma after interferon therapy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 12:1186–1195. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

7 

Asahina Y, Tsuchiya K, Nishimura T, Muraoka M, Suzuki Y, Tamaki N, Yasui Y, Hosokawa T, Ueda K, Nakanishi H, et al: α-fetoprotein levels after interferon therapy and risk of hepatocarcinogenesis in chronic hepatitis C. Hepatology. 58:1253–1262. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

8 

Makiyama A, Itoh Y, Kasahara A, Imai Y, Kawata S, Yoshioka K, Tsubouchi H, Kiyosawa K, Kakumu S, Okita K, et al: Characteristics of patients with chronic hepatitis C who develop hepatocellular carcinoma after a sustained response to interferon therapy. Cancer. 101:1616–1622. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

9 

Hirakawa M, Ikeda K, Arase Y, Kawamura Y, Yatsuji H, Hosaka T, Sezaki H, Akuta N, Kobayashi M, Saitoh S, et al: Hepatocarcinogenesis following HCV RNA eradication by interferon in chronic hepatitis patients. Intern Med. 47:1637–1643. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

10 

Hayashi T, Tamori A, Nishikawa M, Morikawa H, Enomoto M, Sakaguchi H, Habu D, Kawada N, Kubo S, Nishiguchi S and Shiomi S: Differences in molecular alterations of hepatocellular carcinoma between patients with a sustained virological response and those with hepatitis C virus infection. Liver Int. 29:126–132. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

11 

Matsuura K, Sawai H, Ikeo K, Ogawa S, Iio E, Isogawa M, Shimada N, Komori A, Toyoda H, Kumada T, et al: Genome-wide association study identifies TLL1 variant associated with development of hepatocellular carcinoma after eradication of hepatitis C virus infection. Gastroenterol. 152:1383–1394. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar

12 

Theise ND, Park YN, Curado MP, Sakamoto M, Franceschi S, Torbenson M, Hytiroglou P, Wee A and Kudo M: WHO classification of tumours of the digestive system. Lyon: IARC Press; pp. 205–216. 2010

13 

Ichida F, Tsuji T, Omata M, Inoue K, Kamimura T, Yamada G, Hino K, Yokosuka O and Suzuki H: New Inuyama classification; new criteria for histological assessment of chronic hepatitis. Int Hepatol Commun. 6:112–119. 1996. View Article : Google Scholar

14 

Umeno Y, Ogasawara S, Akiba J, Hattori S, Kusano H, Nakashima O, Koga H, Torimura T, Yamakawa R and Yano H: Regulator of G-protein signaling 5 enhances portal vein invasion in hepatocellular carcinoma. Oncol Lett. 15:1763–1770. 2018.PubMed/NCBI

15 

Sun Y, Zhou J, Wang L, Wu X, Chen Y, Piao H, Lu L, Jiang W, Xu Y, Feng B, et al: New classification of liver biopsy assessment for fibrosis in chronic hepatitis B patients before and after treatment. Hepatology. 65:1438–1450. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

16 

Calderaro J, Rousseau B, Amaddeo G, Mercey M, Charpy C, Costentin C, Luciani A, Zafrani ES, Laurent A, Azoulay D, et al: Programmed death ligand 1 expression in hepatocellular carcinoma: Relationship with clinical and pathological features. Hepatology. 64:2038–2046. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

17 

Gao Q, Wang XY, Qiu SJ, Yamato I, Sho M, Nakajima Y, Zhou J, Li BZ, Shi YH, Xiao YS, et al: Overexpression of PD-L1 significantly associates with tumor aggressiveness and postoperative recurrence in human hepatocellular carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res. 15:971–979. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

18 

Hu M, Chen X, Zhang J, Wang D, Fang X, Wang X, Wang G, Chen G, Jiang X, Xia H and Wang Y: Over-expression of regulator of G protein signaling 5 promotes tumor metastasis by including ephithelial-mesenchymal transition in hepatocellular carcinoma cells. J Surg Oncol. 108:192–196. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

19 

Tsujikawa H, Masugi Y, Yamazaki K, Itano O, Kitagawa Y and Sakamoto M: Immunohistochemical molecular analysis indicates hepatocellular carcinoma subgroups that reflect tumor aggressiveness. Hum Pathol. 50:24–33. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

20 

Calderaro J, Couchy G, Imbeaud S, Amaddeo G, Letouzé E, Blanc JF, Laurent C, Hajji Y, Azoulay D, Bioulac-Sage P, et al: Histological subtypes of hepatocellular carcinoma are related to gene mutations and molecular tumour classification. J Hepatol. 67:727–738. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

21 

Goossens N, Sun X and Hoshida Y: Molecular classification of hepatocellular carcinoma: Potential therapeutic implications. Hepatol Oncol. 2:371–379. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar

22 

George SL, Bacon BR, Brunt EM, Mihindukulasuriya KL, Hoffmann J and Di Bisceglie AM: Clinical, virologic histologic, and biochemical outcomes after successful HCV therapy: A 5-year follow-up of 150 patients. Hepatology. 49:729–738. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

23 

Sasaki R, Yamasaki K, Abiru S, Komori A, Nagaoka S, Saeki A, Hashimoto S, Bekki S, Kugiyama Y, Kuno A, et al: Serum wisteria floribunda agglutinin-positive Mac-2 binding protein values predict the development of hepatocellular carcinoma among patients with chronic hepatitis C after sustained virological response. PLoS One. 10:e1290532015. View Article : Google Scholar

24 

Bekki Y, Yoshizumi T, Shimoda S, Itoh S, Harimoto N, Ikegami T, Kuno A, Narimatsu H, Shirabe K and Maehara Y: Hepatic stelleate cells secreting WFA+-M2BP: Its role in biological interactions with Kupffer cells. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 32:1387–1393. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

25 

Friedman SL: Hepatic stellate cells: Protean, multifunctional, and enigmatic cells of the liver. Physiol Rev. 88:125–172. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

26 

Motoyama H, Komiya T, Thuy le TT, Tamori A, Enomoto M, Morikawa H, Iwai S, Uchida-Kobayashi S, Fujii H, Hagihara A, et al: Cytoglobin is expressed in hepatic stellate cells, but not in myofibroblasts, in normal and fibrotic human liver. Lab Invest. 94:192–207. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

27 

Couvelard A, Scoazec JY and Feldmann G: Expression of cell-cell and cell-matrix adhesion proteins by sinusoidal endothelial cells in the normal and cirrhotic human liver. Am J Pathol. 143:738–752. 1993.PubMed/NCBI

28 

Nonaka H, Tanaka M, Suzuki K and Miyajima A: Development of murine hepatic sinusoidal endothelial cells characterized by the expression of hyaluronan receptors. Dev Dyn. 236:2258–2267. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

29 

Martinez-Hernandez A and Martinez J: The role of capillarization in hepatic failure: Studies in carbon tetrachloride-induced cirrhosis. Hepatology. 14:864–874. 1991. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

30 

Blanc JF, Bioulac-Sage P and Rosenbaum J: Hepatic stellate cells and liver fibrogenesis. Gastroenterol Clin Biol. 21:869–879. 1997.(In French). PubMed/NCBI

Related Articles

Journal Cover

August-2019
Volume 18 Issue 2

Print ISSN: 1792-1074
Online ISSN:1792-1082

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Kondo R, Akiba J, Ogasawara S, Nakashima O, Naito Y, Kusano H, Mihara Y, Tanigawa M and Yano H: Programmed death‑ligand 1 expression is an unfavorable prognostic factor of hepatocellular carcinoma after archiving sustained virologic response for hepatitis C virus infection. Oncol Lett 18: 1458-1466, 2019
APA
Kondo, R., Akiba, J., Ogasawara, S., Nakashima, O., Naito, Y., Kusano, H. ... Yano, H. (2019). Programmed death‑ligand 1 expression is an unfavorable prognostic factor of hepatocellular carcinoma after archiving sustained virologic response for hepatitis C virus infection. Oncology Letters, 18, 1458-1466. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2019.10448
MLA
Kondo, R., Akiba, J., Ogasawara, S., Nakashima, O., Naito, Y., Kusano, H., Mihara, Y., Tanigawa, M., Yano, H."Programmed death‑ligand 1 expression is an unfavorable prognostic factor of hepatocellular carcinoma after archiving sustained virologic response for hepatitis C virus infection". Oncology Letters 18.2 (2019): 1458-1466.
Chicago
Kondo, R., Akiba, J., Ogasawara, S., Nakashima, O., Naito, Y., Kusano, H., Mihara, Y., Tanigawa, M., Yano, H."Programmed death‑ligand 1 expression is an unfavorable prognostic factor of hepatocellular carcinoma after archiving sustained virologic response for hepatitis C virus infection". Oncology Letters 18, no. 2 (2019): 1458-1466. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2019.10448