Open Access

High interleukin‑8 and/or extracellular signal‑regulated kinase 2 expression predicts poor prognosis in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma

  • Authors:
    • Youyuan Deng
    • Zhijie Ning
    • Zhiya Hu
    • Qianle Yu
    • Bin He
    • Guohuang Hu
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: September 23, 2019     https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2019.10907
  • Pages: 5215-5224
  • Copyright: © Deng et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License.

Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

Interleukin (IL)‑8 and extracellular signal‑regulated kinase (ERK) 2 play key roles in tumor progression, but the relationship between IL‑8 and/or ERK2 expression in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) tissues and postoperative recurrence or survival is unclear. The expression levels of IL‑8 and ERK2 in both HCC tissues and non‑tumor liver tissues were analyzed using the Oncomine™ database and immunohistochemistry assay. Reverse transcription‑quantitative PCR was then used to evaluate the expression levels of IL‑8 and ERK2 in the tumor tissues of 67 patients with HCC undergoing radical hepatectomy. Pearson's correlation, Kaplan‑Meier, Cox univariate and multivariate survival analyses were utilized to determine the correlation between IL‑8 and ERK2 expression in HCC tissues, and their potential prognostic significance. As indicated by the data from the Oncomine™ database, and the patient samples, IL‑8 and ERK2 were expressed at significantly higher levels in HCC tissues than in non‑tumor liver tissues (P<0.05). The rates of high IL‑8 and ERK2 expression in HCC tissues were 43.28 (29/67) and 34.33% (23/67), respectively, and the IL‑8 and ERK2 expression levels were positively correlated (r=0.764; P<0.001). Both ERK2 expression and IL‑8/ERK2 co‑expression were significantly associated with tumor size and differentiation (P<0.05). Additionally, high expression levels of IL‑8, ERK2 and IL‑8/ERK2 co‑expression were all significantly associated with poor overall survival (OS; P<0.05) and disease‑free survival (DFS; P<0.05). Multivariate Cox regression analysis also showed that high expression levels of IL‑8, ERK2, and IL‑8 and ERK2 were independent prognostic factors for OS and DFS (P<0.05). The results of the present study indicate a significant increase in the risk of recurrence and mortality in HCC patients with high expression levels of IL‑8 and/or ERK2, compared with patients with low expression. Therefore, IL‑8 and ERK2 may be predictors of postoperative prognosis in patients with HCC.

Introduction

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most prevalent primary malignancies of the liver (1). It is the fourth leading cause of cancer-associated mortality worldwide (2), and the third leading cause in China (3), where chronic hepatitis B virus infection and aflatoxin exposure are major risk factors (2). Surgical resection is the primary method of treating HCC, but due to rapid disease progression, most patients exhibit extensive metastasis before the time of surgery. Moreover, only ~20% of HCC patients undergo radical surgical resection (4); following resection, the 2-year HCC recurrence rate is as high as 55%, and most patients develop unresectable metastatic disease (5). The 5-year survival rate of HCC patients is <50% (6). Therefore, identification of early indicator molecules for postoperative recurrence and survival, and the improvement of long-term survival, are urgently required.

Interleukins (ILs)-6, IL-8, IL-17 and IL-10, as well as other inflammation- or immunity-related cytokines, have received attention for their association with tumors. These cytokines can either promote or inhibit the development of tumors (7), and are critical for assessing the risk of postoperative recurrence and long-term survival. IL-8, also known as CXC chemokine 8, has received increasing interest as a tumor inflammatory factor. IL-8 is a member of the chemokine family (8) and plays an important role in the tumor microenvironment, influencing tumor progression and regulating neovascularization, tumor cell growth, apoptosis and cell migration (9,10). It is expressed in a variety of tumors such as lung (11), breast (12) and colon cancer (13); a study by Wang et al (14) demonstrated that IL-8 expression is elevated in HCC. IL-8 promotes tumor cellular proliferation and neovascularization, either directly or indirectly, through tumor vascular endothelial cell receptors, thereby promoting tumor growth and metastasis (14,15).

IL-8 also induces the activation of the classical mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling cascade, and subsequent downstream phosphorylation of both extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK)1 and ERK2 in neutrophils and tumor cells (16). ERK1/2 are key members of the MAPK family, whose activation is closely associated with the occurrence and development of various tumors (17,18). Furthermore, Schmitz et al (19) detected high expression levels of ERK1/2 in HCC tissues, and ERK1/2 activation in HCC also constitutes an independent prognostic factor. Although these data reveal a possible role for IL-8 and ERK1/2 in tumor progression, the relationship between IL-8 and/or ERK2 expression in HCC tissues, and postoperative recurrence and survival, remains unclear.

To further study the relationship between IL-8 and/or ERK2 levels in HCC, and recurrence and survival after hepatectomy, the expression levels of IL-8 and ERK2 in non-tumor liver tissues and HCC tissues were determined using the Oncomine™ database and immunohistochemistry (IHC). Subsequently, reverse transcription-quantitative (RT-q) PCR was used to quantify IL-8 and ERK2 expression in the tumor tissues of 67 patients with HCC, and their relationship with HCC clinical pathological features was then determined. This in-depth study of the risk factors of HCC recurrence and survival provides a theoretical basis for improving the long-term survival of patients with HCC.

Materials and methods

Data retrieval from the Oncomine™ database

To investigate the clinical importance of IL-8 and ERK2 in HCC, Oncomine™ [https://www.oncomine.org/resource/main.html; GSE14323 (GPL571) and GSE14520 (GPL3921)] was searched for published data to analyze the mRNA expression levels of IL-8 and ERK2 in HCC tissues and non-tumor liver tissues (20,21).

Patient information

The use of patient samples in the present study was approved by The Hunan Normal University Medical Ethics Committee, and accords with the provisions stated in The Declaration of Helsinki, as revised in 2013. A total of 67 frozen HCC specimens were collected from patients who underwent surgery at the Department of General Surgery, Affiliated Changsha Hospital, Hunan Normal University between January 2002 and December 2012. An additional 60 paraffin-embedded HCC tissues and adjacent non-tumor liver tissues were collected. The inclusion criteria were: i) R0 tumor resection and ii) postoperative pathology confirmed as HCC. The exclusion criteria were: i) Administration of any anti-cancer treatment before surgery; ii) serious complications or death within 30 days post-surgery; iii) non-tumor related mortality; and iv) incomplete clinical, pathological or surgical data. The 67 HCC patients were aged between 36 and 83 years, with a median age of 55.0 years. There was a total of 55 men and 12 women, with a male-to-female ratio of 4.58:1. According to the TNM staging detailed in the eighth edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) Cancer Staging Manual (22), 42 patients had stage I tumors, 18 had stage II tumors, and 7 had stage III tumors.

IHC

All patient specimens were fixed in 10% neutral formalin, embedded in paraffin, cut into 4-µm-thick serial sections and stained as previously described (23). The primary antibody against IL-8 was purchased from R&D Systems, Inc., (1:500; cat. no. AF-208-NA), and the primary antibody against ERK2 was purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc., (1:200, cat. no. SC-1647). Expression levels were scored as the proportion of the immuno-positive staining area (0, 0%; 1, 1–25%; 2, 26–50%; and 3, 51–100%) multiplied by the staining intensity (0, negative; 1, low; 2, medium; 3, high), and ranged from 0 to 9. The scores were independently evaluated by two pathologists.

RT-qPCR

Total RNA was extracted from the frozen HCC tissues using TRIzol® (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) according to the manufacturer's protocol. Subsequently, reverse transcription was performed using the PrimeScript™ RT kit (Takara Bio, Inc.) according to the manufacturer's protocols. SYBR Premix EX Taq™ (Takara Bio, Inc.) was used for qPCR (according to the manufacturer's protocol) on an ABI 7900 Prism HT (Applied Biosystems; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). Relative gene expression was quantified using the 2−ΔΔCq method (24), and the patients were divided into high- and low-IL-8 and -ERK2 expression groups using the median expression value as the cut-off point. The PCR primers were as follows: IL-8 forward, 5′-AAGAAACCACCGGAAGGAAC-3′, and reverse, 5′-ACTCCTTGGCAAAACTGCAC-3′; ERK2 forward, 5′-GAAGGTGCCTACGGGATGG-3′, and reverse, 5′-GGTCAATGGTTGGTGTGCGG-3′; and GAPDH forward, 5′-AACAGCCTCAAGATCATCAGCA-3′, and reverse, 5′-CATGAGTCCTTCCACGATACCA-3′. The thermocycling conditions were as follows: Initial denaturation for 30 sec at 98°C, followed by 24 cycles of 98°C for 15 sec and 72°C for 30 sec, and lastly 72°C for 5 min to allow final extension before cooling to 4°C.

Case follow-up

Follow-ups in the form of outpatient visits or telephone calls were conducted for all cases that met the study criteria. The regular follow-up plan was as follows: i) Review every 3 months within 2 years after surgery; ii) review every 6 months after 2–5 years; and iii) review every year after 5 years. The review included an analysis of liver function, an abdominal ultrasound and a chest radiograph. If required, enhanced computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging and needle biopsy were performed. Recurrence was defined as confirmation of the presence of new lesions in or outside of the liver via imaging studies or biopsy. Overall survival (OS) was defined as the time between the date of surgery to death or follow-up, and disease-free survival (DFS) was defined as the date of surgery to relapse or follow-up. Both OS and DFS were calculated on a monthly basis, and the follow-up deadline was December 2018.

Statistical analysis

Statistical processing was performed using SPSS software v.19.0 (IBM Corp.). Spearman's correlation analysis was used to calculate the correlation between IL-8 and ERK2 expression levels. The χ2 test and Fisher's exact probability test were used to analyze the correlation between IL-8 and ERK2 expression in HCC tissues, and patient clinicopathological features. Survival analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier curves, and the relationship between IL-8 and/or ERK2 expression and postoperative recurrence, and survival in patients with HCC was determined using the log-rank test. Univariate and multivariate analyses of HCC recurrence and survival were performed using the Cox proportional hazard model to screen for variables. The data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation, and P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.

Results

Expression of IL-8 and ERK2 in non-tumor liver tissues and HCC tissues

The mRNA expression levels of IL-8 and ERK2 were retrieved from two published HCC datasets published in the Oncomine™ database. It was observed that the mRNA levels of both IL-8 and ERK2 were significantly higher in HCC tissues compared with non-tumor liver tissues from both datasets (P<0.05; Fig. 1A-D). Subsequently, this result was validated in patient samples using IHC. The protein expression levels of IL-8 and ERK2 were significantly higher in HCC tissues compared with non-tumor liver tissues (P<0.05; Fig. 1E-H).

Relationship between IL-8 and/or ERK2 expression and the clinicopathological features of HCC

IL-8 and ERK2 exhibited high expression rates in 43.28 (29/67) and 34.33% (23/67) of the HCC tissues, respectively. Additionally, Pearson's correlation analysis indicated a positive correlation between IL-8 and ERK2 expression (r=0.764; P<0.001; Table I). Although no significant correlation was observed between IL-8 expression and clinicopathological features in HCC tissues, ERK2 expression was significantly associated with both tumor size and differentiation (P<0.05; Table II). Moreover, IL-8 and ERK2 co-expression was also significantly associated with tumor size and differentiation (P<0.05; Table II).

Table I.

Association between mRNA expression levels of IL-8 and ERK2.

Table I.

Association between mRNA expression levels of IL-8 and ERK2.

IL-8 expression

ERK2 expressionHighLowPearson's contingency coefficientP-value
High2210.764 <0.001a
Low737

{ label (or @symbol) needed for fn[@id='tfn1-ol-0-0-10907'] } IL-8, interleukin-8; ERK2, extracellular regulated protein kinases 2.

a P<0.05.

Table II.

Correlations of IL-8 and ERK2 mRNA expression with clinicopathological characteristics.

Table II.

Correlations of IL-8 and ERK2 mRNA expression with clinicopathological characteristics.

IL-8 ERK2 IL-8 and ERK2



ParameterHighLowP-valueHighLowP-valueBoth highOthersP-value
Sex 0.158 0.678 0.765
  Male2629 2035 1936
  Female39 39 39
Age 0.372 0.940 0.747
  <50, years713 713 614
  ≥50, years2225 1631 1631
Alcoholism 0.438 0.180 0.325
  Absence1827 1332 1332
  Presence1111 1012 913
HBV 0.623 1.000 1.000
  Positive2333 1937 1838
  Negative65 47 47
Cirrhosis 0.502 1.000 1.000
  Absence02 11 02
  Presence2936 2243 2243
AFP 0.660 0.634 0.958
  ≤400 µg/l2227 1633 1633
  >400 µg/l711 711 612
Albumin 0.669 1.000 1.000
  <35 g/l25 25 25
  ≥35 g/l2733 2139 2040
ALT 0.401 0.848 0.435
  ≤60 U/l2630 2036 2036
  >60 U/l38 38 29
AST 0.839 0.923 0.728
  ≤42 U/l2228 1733 1733
  >42 U/l710 611 512
PLT 0.352 0.923 0.803
  <100×109/l98 611 611
  ≥100×109/l2030 1733 1634
Bilirubin 0.623 1.000 1.000
  ≤22 µmol/l2333 1937 1838
  >22 µmol/l65 47 47
Tumor number 0.662 1.000 1.000
  Single2434 2038 1939
  Multiple54 36 36
Tumor size 0.117 0.013a 0.019a
  ≤5 cm1932 1338 1239
  >5 cm96 96 96
Tumor margin 0.981 0.627 0.762
  ≤2 cm1013 716 716
  >2 cm1925 1628 1529
Pathological differentiation 0.134 0.014a 0.008a
  High1931 1337 1238
  Middle and low107 107 107
Microvascular tumor thrombus 0.469 0.524 0.415
  Yes1010 812 812
  No1928 1532 1433
Capsule invasion 0.971 0.846 0.951
  Yes2330 1934 1835
  No68 410 410
TNM stage 0.236 0.078 0.061
  I+II2436 1842 1743
  III52 52 52

{ label (or @symbol) needed for fn[@id='tfn3-ol-0-0-10907'] } IL-8, interleukin-8; ERK2, extracellular signal-regulated kinase 2; HBV, hepatitis B virus; AFP, alpha-fetoprotein; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, alanine aminotransferase; PLT, platelet; TNM, tumor, lymph node, metastasis.

a P<0.05.

Relationship between IL-8 and/or ERK2 expression and postoperative prognosis

In the data from the 67 HCC samples, the median follow-up time was 49.56±25.79 months (range, 1.8–78.1 months). The OS rates of patients at 1, 3 and 5 years were 85.08, 65.67 and 58.21%, respectively, while DFS rates were 67.16, 49.25 and 40.30%, respectively (Data not shown). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis of 67 patients with HCC exhibited significantly shorter OS (P<0.0001; Fig. 2A) and DFS (P<0.0001; Fig. 2B) times in the IL-8 high-expression group compared with the low-expression group. Furthermore, the ERK2 high-expression group had shorter OS (P<0.0001; Fig. 2C) and DFS (P<0.0001; Fig. 2D) times than the corresponding low-expression group. Based on these results, the 67 patients with HCC were divided into three groups for further Kaplan-Meier analysis (low IL-8 and low ERK2 group, high IL-8 or high ERK2 group, and high IL-8 and high ERK2 group). OS (P<0.001; Fig. 3A, C and E) and DFS (P<0.0001; Fig. 3B, D and F) were significantly shorter in the IL-8 and/or ERK2 high-expression group than in the low-expression group.

Given the significant correlation between IL-8 and ERK2 expression, univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard analyses were performed on the IL-8 expression group, the ERK2 expression group and the IL-8 and ERK2 expression group. Further multivariate Cox regression analysis was then performed on the significant factors identified from univariate analysis (Tables III and IV). The multivariate Cox regression analysis of the IL-8 expression group showed that TNM stage III [hazard ratio (HR)=6.246; 95% confidence interval (CI), 2.233–17.471; P<0.001] and high IL-8 expression (HR=12.369; 95% CI, 4.589–33.341; P<0.001) were independent risk factors for OS (Table V), while a platelet count (PLT) <100×109/l (HR=2.106; 95% CI, 1.071–4.141; P=0.031), TNM stage III (HR=3.477; 95% CI, 1.367–8.847; P=0.009) and high-IL-8 expression (HR=6.620; 95% CI, 3.350–13.084; P<0.001) were all independent risk factors for DFS (Table VI). Multivariate Cox regression analysis of the ERK2 expression group showed that TNM stage III (HR=4.832; 95% CI, 1.760–13.269; P=0.002) and high ERK2 expression (HR=10.011; 95% CI, 4.268–23.479; P<0.001) were independent risk factors for OS (Table V), while PLT<100 109/l (HR=2.171; 95% CI, 1.115–4.226; P=0.023), TNM stage III (HR=2.873; 95% CI, 1.153–7.156; P=0.023) and high ERK2 expression (HR=5.263; 95% CI, 2.760–10.036; P<0.001) were independent risk factors for DFS (Table VI). Furthermore, multivariate Cox regression models of the IL-8 and ERK2 expression groups showed that TNM stage III (OS: HR=4.595; 95% CI, 1.682–12.549; P=0.003. DFS: HR=2.821; 95% CI, 1.134–7.017; P=0.026) with IL-8 and ERK2 co-expression (OS: HR=9.082; 95% CI, 3.974–20.757; P<0.001. DFS: HR=4.918; 95% CI, 2.586–9.355; P<0.001) was an independent risk factor for both OS and DFS (Tables V and VI). PLT<100 109/l (HR=2.101; 95% CI, 1.080–4.086; P=0.029) was also shown to be an independent risk factor for DFS (Table VI).

Table III.

Univariate analysis of variables with patient overall survival (Cox regression model).

Table III.

Univariate analysis of variables with patient overall survival (Cox regression model).

Univariate analysis

VariableHazard ratio95% CIP-value
Sex (male vs. female)2.1430.647–7.1010.212
Age (≥50 vs. <50, years)1.0460.460–2.3750.915
HBV (positive vs. negative)2.1100.895–4.9750.088
Cirrhosis (present vs. absent)1.0530.143–7.7560.960
AFP (>400 µg/l vs. ≤400 µg/l)1.2050.531–2.7370.655
Albumin (>35 g/l vs. ≥35 g/l)1.1590.350–3.8400.809
ALT (>60 U/l vs. ≤60 U/l)1.3520.547–3.3400.513
AST (>42 U/l vs. ≤42 U/l)1.8590.856–4.0350.117
PLT (<100×109/l vs. ≥100×109/l)1.9920.918–4.3230.081
Bilirubin (>20 µmol/l vs. ≤20 µmol/l)1.7400.704–4.3020.231
Tumor number (multiple vs. single)1.7990.683–4.7400.235
Tumor size (>5 cm vs. ≤5 cm)2.5801.187–5.6060.017a
Tumor margin (≤2 cm vs. >2 cm)1.0520.476–2.3260.900
Pathological differentiation (middle and low vs. high)1.8000.813–3.9870.147
Microvascular tumor thrombus (yes vs. no)1.3470.609–2.9790.462
Capsule invasion (yes vs. no)1.0630.431–2.6230.894
TNM stage (III vs. I+II)5.3642.123–13.554 <0.001a
IL-8 (positive vs. negative)11.6184.373–30.863 <0.001a
ERK2 (positive vs. negative)10.0904.366–23.317 <0.001a
IL-8 and ERK2 (both vs. others)3.9382.424–6.397 <0.001a

{ label (or @symbol) needed for fn[@id='tfn5-ol-0-0-10907'] } CI, confidence interval; HBV, hepatitis B virus; AFP, alpha-fetoprotein; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, alanine aminotransferase; PLT, platelet; TNM, tumor, lymph node, metastasis; IL-8, interleukin-8; ERK2, extracellular signal-regulated kinase 2.

a P<0.05.

Table IV.

Univariate analysis of variables with patient disease-free survival (Cox regression model).

Table IV.

Univariate analysis of variables with patient disease-free survival (Cox regression model).

Univariate analysis

VariableHazard ratio95% CIP-value
Sex (male vs. female)1.5670.660–3.7190.309
Age (≥50 vs. <50, years)1.6310.867–3.0690.129
HBV (positive vs. negative)1.5000.693–3.2440.304
Cirrhosis (present vs. absent)1.3800.190–10.0420.750
AFP (>400 µg/l vs. ≤400 µg/l)1.5370.798–2.9600.198
Albumin (<35 g/l vs. ≥35 g/l)1.0080.360–2.8260.988
ALT (>60 U/l vs. ≤60 U/l)1.0640.472–2.3980.882
AST (>42 U/l vs. ≤42 U/l)1.2090.607–2.4110.589
PLT (<100×109/l vs. ≥100×109/l)1.9401.015–3.7080.045a
Bilirubin (>20 µmol/l vs. ≤20 µmol/l)1.4000.648–3.0280.392
Tumor number (multiple vs. single)1.7660.783–3.9830.171
Tumor size (>5 cm vs. ≤5 cm)2.0701.075–3.9870.030a
Tumor margin (≤2 cm vs. >2 cm)1.1570.601–2.2260.663
Pathological differentiation (middle and low vs. high)1.0850.532–2.2120.822
Microvascular tumor thrombus (yes vs. no)1.0640.544–2.0790.856
Capsule invasion (yes vs. no)1.0880.520–2.2760.822
TNM stage (III vs. I+II)3.0711.284–7.3420.012a
IL-8 (positive vs. negative)6.0983.172–11.720 <0.001a
ERK2 (positive vs. negative)5.0482.701–9.433 <0.001a
IL-8 and ERK2 (both vs. others)2.6071.868–3.639 <0.001a

{ label (or @symbol) needed for fn[@id='tfn7-ol-0-0-10907'] } CI, confidence interval; HBV, hepatitis B virus; AFP, alpha-fetoprotein; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, alanine aminotransferase; PLT, platelet; TNM, tumor, lymph node, metastasis; IL-8, interleukin-8; ERK2, extracellular signal-regulated kinase 2.

a P<0.05.

Table V.

Multivariate analysis of variables with patient overall survival (Cox regression model).

Table V.

Multivariate analysis of variables with patient overall survival (Cox regression model).

VariableHazard ratio95% CIP-value
IL-8
  TNM stage (III vs. I+II)6.2462.233–17.471 <0.001a
  IL-8 (high vs. low)12.3694.589–33.341 <0.001a
ERK2
  TNM stage (III vs. I+II)4.8321.760–13.2690.002a
  ERK2 (high vs. low)10.0114.268–23.479 <0.001a
IL-8 and ERK2
  TNM stage (III vs. I+II)4.5951.682–12.5490.003a
  IL-8 and ERK2 (both vs. others)9.0823.974–20.757 <0.001a

{ label (or @symbol) needed for fn[@id='tfn9-ol-0-0-10907'] } CI, confidence interval; TNM, tumor, lymph node, metastasis; IL-8, interleukin-8; ERK2, extracellular signal-regulated kinase 2.

a P<0.05.

Table VI.

Multivariate analysis of variables with patient disease-free survival (Cox regression model).

Table VI.

Multivariate analysis of variables with patient disease-free survival (Cox regression model).

VariableHazard ratio95% CIP-value
IL-8
  PLT (<100×109/l vs.2.1061.071–4.1410.031a
  ≥100×109/l)
  TNM stage (III vs. I+II)3.4771.367–8.8470.009a
  IL-8 (high vs. low)6.6203.350–13.084 <0.001a
ERK2
  PLT (<100×109/l vs.2.1711.115–4.2260.023a
  ≥100×109/l)
  TNM stage (III vs. I+II)2.8731.153–7.1560.023a
  ERK2 (high vs. low)5.2632.760–10.036 <0.001a
IL-8 and ERK2
  PLT (<100×109/l vs.2.1011.080–4.0860.029a
  ≥100×109/l)
  TNM stage (III vs. I+II)2.8211.134–7.0170.026a
  IL-8 and ERK2 (both vs. others)4.9182.586–9.355 <0.001a

{ label (or @symbol) needed for fn[@id='tfn11-ol-0-0-10907'] } CI, confidence interval; PLT, platelet; TNM, tumor, lymph node, metastasis; IL-8, interleukin-8; ERK2, extracellular signal-regulated kinase 2.

a P<0.05.

Discussion

The present study demonstrated that HCC patients with high IL-8 and/or ERK2 expression had significantly higher risks of recurrence and death than those with low expression. The Oncomine™ database and IHC were used to show that IL-8 and ERK2 expression were significantly higher in HCC tissues compared with non-tumor liver tissues. A positive correlation was also found between IL-8 and ERK2 expression in tissues from HCC patients using RT-qPCR. Moreover, IL-8 and/or ERK2 expression was significantly associated with tumor size and differentiation, and patients with high IL-8 and/or ERK2 expression had a poorer prognosis than the low expression group. Multivariate survival analysis further supported the high expression of IL-8 and/or ERK2 in HCC as an independent risk factor for OS and DFS.

The important role played by inflammation and the immune response in the occurrence and development of tumors has gradually become more recognized. A previous study reported that IL-8 is closely associated with the occurrence and development of HCC (25). In the present study, it was observed that IL-8 was expressed to a significantly higher level in HCC tissues, compared with non-tumor liver tissues, consistent with the results of a previous study (14). Schmitz et al (19) detected high expression levels of ERK1/2 in patient HCC tissues, and this was also detected in the HCC tissues examined in the present study. Waugh and Wilson (16) reported that IL-8 in tumor cells was able to promote ERK1/2 phosphorylation, thereby promoting tumor growth and metastasis. A significant positive correlation between IL-8 and ERK2 in HCC tissues was also detected, indicating that high expression of IL-8 influences disease progression by activating ERK2.

There is increasing evidence that serum IL-8 levels are an effective predictor of prognosis in patients with HCC (26), pancreatic cancer (27) and lymphoma (28), and that high nuclear ERK2 expression is an indicator of poor prognosis in patients with invasive breast cancer (29). However, these studies have been limited to the use of serum IL-8, and the relationship between IL-8 and/or ERK2 expression in HCC tissues and patient prognosis is poorly understood. The present study found that patients with high expression levels of IL-8 and/or ERK2 in HCC tissues had a worse prognosis than those in the low expression group. In addition, high expression levels of IL-8 and/or ERK2 in HCC tissues were shown to be an independent risk factor for OS and DFS in HCC. These data provide new insights for research into HCC progression, which may offer novel targets for the development of anti-tumor drugs.

The cytokine network is a complex system, with cytokine gene expression affected by other cytokines and the existence of synergistic restrictions and inhibition (30,31). As well as elevated IL-8 levels, patients with HCC also exhibit characteristic changes in expression of various cytokines, such as decreased IL-2 or elevated IL-6 and tumor necrosis factor-α (3234). Therefore, in addition to the application of IL-8 and ERK2 as early indicator molecules, the deregulation of other cytokines in HCC should be examined to advance disease understanding, diagnosis and treatment. Moreover, because the present study is a single-center study of a small sample size, future studies of larger sample populations should be investigated to confirm these findings.

In summary, a significant positive correlation between the expression of IL-8 and ERK2 in HCC tissues was reported. It was also found that high expression levels of IL-8 and/or ERK2 in HCC tissues were an independent risk factor for OS and DFS, and that HCC patients with high IL-8 and/or ERK2 expression had worse prognoses than those with low expression. The results of the present study support the hypothesis that patients with high expression of IL-8 and/or ERK2 should undergo more frequent follow-ups. Additionally, IL-8 and ERK2 are potential predictors of postoperative prognosis in patients with HCC, and therefore, may be used as therapeutic targets for the development of drugs that prevent HCC recurrence, thereby improving the long-term survival of patients with HCC.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Dr Sarah Williams (University of Oxford, Oxford, UK) for her assistance in revising this manuscript.

Funding

The present study was supported by the Hunan Provincial Natural & Science Foundation (grant no. 2018JJ6126).

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the present study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Authors' contributions

Study conception and design were conducted by GH, who also provided administrative support. YD, QY and BH provided the study materials. YD, QY, BH and ZH collected and assembled the data, and data analysis and interpretation were undertaken by YD and ZN. The manuscript was written and approved by all of the authors.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The use of materials in the present study was approved by the Hunan Normal University Medical Ethics Committee, and all patients provided written informed consent.

Patient consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

1 

Gao J, Xie L, Yang WS, Zhang W, Gao S, Wang J and Xiang YB: Risk factors of hepatocellular carcinoma-Current status and perspectives. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 13:743–752. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

2 

Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA and Jemal A: Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 68:394–424. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

3 

Chen W, Zheng R, Baade PD, Zhang S, Zeng H, Bray F, Jemal A, Yu XQ and He J: Cancer statistics in China, 2015. CA Cancer J Clin. 66:115–132. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

4 

Hong J, Hu K, Yuan Y, Sang Y, Bu Q, Chen G, Yang L, Li B, Huang P, Chen D, et al: CHK1 targets spleen tyrosine kinase (L) for proteolysis in hepatocellular carcinoma. J Clin Inves. 122:2165–2175. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar

5 

Cha C, Fong Y, Jarnagin WR, Blumgart LH and DeMatteo RP: Predictors and patterns of recurrence after resection of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Am Coll Surg. 197:753–758. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

6 

Bosch FX, Ribes J, Diaz M and Cleries R: Primary liver cancer: Worldwide incidence and trends. Gastroenterology. 127:S5–S16. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

7 

Lin WW and Karin M: A cytokine-mediated link between innate immunity, inflammation, and cancer. J Clin Invest. 117:1175–1183. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

8 

Zlotnik A and Yoshie O: Chemokines: A new classification system and their role in immunity. Immunity. 12:121–127. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

9 

Yuan A, Chen JJ, Yao PL and Yang PC: The role of interleukin-8 in cancer cells and microenvironment interaction. Front Biosci. 10:853–865. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

10 

Lazennec G and Richmond A: Chemokines and chemokine receptors: New insights into cancer-related inflammation. Trends Mol Med. 16:133–144. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

11 

Zhang Y, Wang L, Zhang M, Jin M, Bai C and Wang X: Potential mechanism of interleukin-8 production from lung cancer cells: An involvement of EGF-EGFR-PI3K-Akt-Erk pathway. J Cell Physiol. 227:35–43. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

12 

Mohamed MM: Monocytes conditioned media stimulate fibronectin expression and spreading of inflammatory breast cancer cells in three-dimensional culture: A mechanism mediated by IL-8 signaling pathway. Cell Commun Signal. 10:32012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

13 

Ning Y, Labonte MJ, Zhang W, Bohanes PO, Gerger A, Yang D, Benhaim L, Paez D, Rosenberg DO, Nagulapalli Venkata KC, et al: The CXCR2 antagonist, SCH-527123, shows antitumor activity and sensitizes cells to oxaliplatin in preclinical colon cancer models. Mol Cancer Ther. 11:1353–1364. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

14 

Wang Y, Wang W, Wang L, Wang X and Xia J: Regulatory mechanisms of interleukin-8 production induced by tumour necrosis factor-α in human hepatocellular carcinoma cells. J Cell Mol Med. 16:496–506. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

15 

Harimoto N, Shirabe K, Abe T, Kajiyama K, Nagaie T, Gion T, Kuroda Y and Maehara Y: Interleukin-8 producing hepatocellular carcinoma with pyrexia. HPB Surg. 2009:4614922009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

16 

Waugh DJ and Wilson C: The interleukin-8 pathway in cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 14:6735–6741. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

17 

Cowley S, Paterson H, Kemp P and Marshall CJ: Activation of MAP kinase kinase is necessary and sufficient for PC12 differentiation and for transformation of NIH 3T3 cells. Cell. 77:841–852. 1994. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

18 

Mansour SJ, Matten WT, Hermann AS, Candia JM, Rong S, Fukasawa K, Vande Woude GF and Ahn NG: Transformation of mammalian cells by constitutively active MAP kinase kinase. Science. 265:966–970. 1994. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

19 

Schmitz KJ, Wohlschlaeger J, Lang H, Sotiropoulos GC, Malago M, Steveling K, Reis H, Cicinnati VR, Schmid KW and Baba HA: Activation of the ERK and AKT signalling pathway predicts poor prognosis in hepatocellular carcinoma and ERK activation in cancer tissue is associated with hepatitis C virus infection. J Hepatol. 48:83–90. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

20 

Mas VR, Maluf DG, Archer KJ, Yanek K, Kong X, Kulik L, Freise CE, Olthoff KM, Ghobrial RM, McIver P and Fisher R: Genes involved in viral carcinogenesis and tumor initiation in hepatitis C virus-induced hepatocellular carcinoma. Mol Med. 15:85–94. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

21 

Roessler S, Jia HL, Budhu A, Forgues M, Ye QH, Lee JS, Thorgeirsson SS, Sun Z, Tang ZY, Qin LX and Wang XW: A unique metastasis gene signature enables prediction of tumor relapse in early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma patients. Cancer Res. 70:10202–10212. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

22 

Kamarajah SK, Frankel TL, Sonnenday C, Cho CS and Nathan H: Critical evaluation of the American Joint Commission on Cancer (AJCC) 8th edition staging system for patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC): A surveillance, epidemiology, end results (SEER) analysis. J Surg Onco. 117:644–650. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar

23 

He L, Fan X, Li Y, Chen M, Cui B, Chen G, Dai Y, Zhou D, Hu X and Lin H: Overexpression of zinc finger protein 384 (ZNF 384), a poor prognostic predictor, promotes cell growth by upregulating the expression of Cyclin D1 in Hepatocellular carcinoma. Cell Death Dis. 10:4442019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

24 

Livak KJ and Schmittgen TD: Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) method. Methods. 25:402–408. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

25 

Ren Y, Poon RT, Tsui HT, Chen WH, Li Z, Lau C, Yu WC and Fan ST: Interleukin-8 serum levels in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: Correlations with clinicopathological features and prognosis. Clin Cancer Res. 9:5996–6001. 2003.PubMed/NCBI

26 

Loosen SH, Schulze-Hagen M, Leyh C, Benz F, Vucur M, Kuhl C, Trautwein C, Tacke F, Bruners P, Roderburg C and Luedde T: IL-6 and IL-8 serum levels predict tumor response and overall survival after TACE for primary and secondary hepatic malignancies. Int J Mol Sci. 19(pii): E17662018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

27 

Feng L, Qi Q, Wang P, Chen H, Chen Z, Meng Z and Liu L: Serum levels of IL-6, IL-8, and IL-10 are indicators of prognosis in pancreatic cancer. J Int Med Res. 46:5228–5236. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

28 

Nacinovic-Duletic A, Stifter S, Dvornik S, Skunca Z and Jonjic N: Correlation of serum IL-6, IL-8 and IL-10 levels with clinicopathological features and prognosis in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Int J Lab Hematol. 30:230–239. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

29 

Nakopoulou L, Mylona E, Rafailidis P, Alexandrou P, Giannopoulou I and Keramopoulos A: Effect of different ERK2 protein localizations on prognosis of patients with invasive breast carcinoma. APMIS. 113:693–701. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

30 

Becher B, Spath S and Goverman J: Cytokine networks in neuroinflammation. Nature reviews. Immunology. 17:49–59. 2017.PubMed/NCBI

31 

Morel PA, Lee REC and Faeder JR: Demystifying the cytokine network: Mathematical models point the way. Cytokine. 98:115–123. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

32 

Liu XL, Li FQ, Liu LX, Li B and Zhou ZP: TNF-α, HGF and macrophage in peritumoural liver tissue relate to major risk factors of HCC Recurrence. Hepatogastroenterology. 60:1121–1126. 2013.PubMed/NCBI

33 

Peng Q, Li H, Lao X, Deng Y, Chen Z, Qin X and Li S: Association of IL-2 polymorphisms and IL-2 serum levels with susceptibility to HBV-related hepatocellular carcinoma in a Chinese Zhuang population. Infect Genet Evol. 27:375–381. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

34 

Pine SR, Mechanic LE, Enewold L, Chaturvedi AK, Katki HA, Zheng YL, Bowman ED, Engels EA, Caporaso NE and Harris CC: Increased levels of circulating interleukin 6, interleukin 8, C-reactive protein, and risk of lung cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 103:1112–1122. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Related Articles

Journal Cover

November-2019
Volume 18 Issue 5

Print ISSN: 1792-1074
Online ISSN:1792-1082

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Deng Y, Ning Z, Hu Z, Yu Q, He B and Hu G: High interleukin‑8 and/or extracellular signal‑regulated kinase 2 expression predicts poor prognosis in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Oncol Lett 18: 5215-5224, 2019.
APA
Deng, Y., Ning, Z., Hu, Z., Yu, Q., He, B., & Hu, G. (2019). High interleukin‑8 and/or extracellular signal‑regulated kinase 2 expression predicts poor prognosis in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Oncology Letters, 18, 5215-5224. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2019.10907
MLA
Deng, Y., Ning, Z., Hu, Z., Yu, Q., He, B., Hu, G."High interleukin‑8 and/or extracellular signal‑regulated kinase 2 expression predicts poor prognosis in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma". Oncology Letters 18.5 (2019): 5215-5224.
Chicago
Deng, Y., Ning, Z., Hu, Z., Yu, Q., He, B., Hu, G."High interleukin‑8 and/or extracellular signal‑regulated kinase 2 expression predicts poor prognosis in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma". Oncology Letters 18, no. 5 (2019): 5215-5224. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2019.10907