|
1
|
Keyvani V, Kheradmand N, Navaei ZN,
Mollazadeh S and Esmaeili SA: Epidemiological trends and risk
factors of gynecological cancers: An update. Med Oncol. 40:932023.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
2
|
Wu Z, Tang H, Xiong Q, Liu D, Xia T, Liang
H and Ye Q: Prognostic role of microRNA-205 in human gynecological
cancer: A meta-analysis of fourteen studies. DNA Cell Biol.
39:875–889. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
3
|
Lu J, Gu Y, Li Q, Zhong H, Wang X, Zheng
Z, Hu W and Wen L: Wilms' tumor 1 (WT1) as a prognosis factor in
gynecological cancers: A meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore).
97:e114852018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
4
|
Lee HJ, Lee YH, Chong GO, Hong DG and Lee
YS: Comparison of robotic-assisted versus laparoscopy for
transperitoneal infrarenal para-aortic lymphadenectomy in patients
with endometrial cancer. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 44:547–555. 2018.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
5
|
Seamon LG, Cohn DE, Richardson DL,
Valmadre S, Carlson MJ, Phillips GS and Fowler JM: Robotic
hysterectomy and pelvic-aortic lymphadenectomy for endometrial
cancer. Obstet Gynecol. 112:1207–1213. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
6
|
Lowe MP, Johnson PR, Kamelle SA, Kumar S,
Chamberlain DH and Tillmanns TD: A multiinstitutional experience
with robotic-assisted hysterectomy with staging for endometrial
cancer. Obstet Gynecol. 114:236–243. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
7
|
Lim PC, Kang E and Park DH: A comparative
detail analysis of the learning curve and surgical outcome for
robotic hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy versus laparoscopic
hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy in treatment of endometrial
cancer: A case-matched controlled study of the first one hundred
twenty two patients. Gynecol Oncol. 120:413–418. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
8
|
Holloway RW, Ahmad S, DeNardis SA,
Peterson LB, Sultana N, Bigsby GE IV, Pikaart DP and Finkler NJ:
Robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy for
endometrial cancer: Analysis of surgical performance. Gynecol
Oncol. 115:447–452. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
9
|
Diaz-Feijoo B, Luna-Guibourg R, Cabrera S,
Manrique S and Gil-Moreno A: Laparoscopic extraperitoneal pelvic
lymph node debulking in locally advanced cervical cancer. J Minim
Invasive Gynecol. 26:3662019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
10
|
Fastrez M, Goffin F, Vergote I, Vandromme
J, Petit P, Leunen K and Degueldre M: Multi-center experience of
robot-assisted laparoscopic para-aortic lymphadenectomy for staging
of locally advanced cervical carcinoma. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand.
92:895–901. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
11
|
Yim GW, Kim SW, Nam EJ, Kim S, Kim HJ and
Kim YT: Surgical outcomes of robotic radical hysterectomy using
three robotic arms versus conventional multiport laparoscopy in
patients with cervical cancer. Yonsei Med J. 55:1222–1230. 2014.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
12
|
Loverix L, Salihi RR, Van Nieuwenhuysen E,
Concin N, Han S, van Gorp T and Vergote I: Para-aortic lymph node
surgical staging in locally-advanced cervical cancer: Comparison
between robotic versus conventional laparoscopy. Int J Gynecol
Cancer. 30:466–472. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
13
|
Magrina JF, Cetta RL, Chang YH, Guevara G
and Magtibay PM: Analysis of secondary cytoreduction for recurrent
ovarian cancer by robotics, laparoscopy and laparotomy. Gynecol
Oncol. 129:336–340. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
14
|
Chen CH, Chiu LH, Chang CW, Yen YK, Huang
YH and Liu WM: Comparing robotic surgery with conventional
laparoscopy and laparotomy for cervical cancer management. Int J
Gynecol Cancer. 24:1105–1111. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
15
|
Gallotta V, Cicero C, Conte C, Vizzielli
G, Petrillo M, Fagotti A, Chiantera V, Costantini B, Scambia G and
Ferrandina G: Robotic versus laparoscopic staging for early ovarian
cancer: A case-matched control study. J Minim Invasive Gynecol.
24:293–298. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
16
|
Oyama K, Kanno K, Kojima R, Shirane A,
Yanai S, Ota Y and Andou M: Short-term outcomes of robotic-assisted
versus conventional laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for
early-stage cervical cancer: A single-center study. J Obstet
Gynaecol Res. 45:405–411. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
17
|
Cook DA and Reed DA: Appraising the
quality of medical education research methods: The medical
education research study quality instrument and the
Newcastle-Ottawa scale-education. Acad Med. 90:1067–1076. 2015.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
18
|
Holzman SA, Grant C, Zee RS, Rana MS,
Sprague B, Blum E and Rushton HG: High incidence of abnormal
imaging findings in circumcised boys diagnosed with urinary tract
infections. J Pediatr Urol. 16:560–565. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
19
|
Nezhat FR, Datta MS, Liu C, Chuang L and
Zakashansky K: Robotic radical hysterectomy versus total
laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy for
treatment of early cervical cancer. JSLS. 12:227–237.
2008.PubMed/NCBI
|
|
20
|
Shi C, Gao Y, Yang Y, Zhang L, Yu J and
Zhang T: Comparison of efficacy of robotic surgery, laparoscopy,
and laparotomy in the treatment of ovarian cancer: A meta-analysis.
World J Surg Oncol. 17:1622019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
21
|
Su MC, Zheng Y, Yang F and Liu YY:
Placement of robotic single-site surgery using the da Vinci Xi
platform and the tumor-free technique for early cervical cancer.
Asian J Surg. S1015-9584(22)01307-0. 2022.(Epub ahead of
print).
|
|
22
|
Yotsumoto F, Sanui A, Ito T, Miyahara D,
Yoshikawa K, Shigekawa K, Noguchi Y, Yasunaga S and Miyamoto S:
Cumulative summation analysis of learning curve for
robotic-assisted hysterectomy in patients with gynecologic tumors.
Anticancer Res. 42:4111–4117. 2022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
23
|
Lanfranco AR, Castellanos AE, Desai JP and
Meyers WC: Robotic surgery: A current perspective. Ann Surg.
239:14–21. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
24
|
Ji Y and Wang H: Prognostic prediction of
systemic immune-inflammation index for patients with gynecological
and breast cancers: A meta-analysis. World J Surg Oncol.
18:1972020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
25
|
Reza M, Maeso S, Blasco JA and Andradas E:
Meta-analysis of observational studies on the safety and
effectiveness of robotic gynaecological surgery. Br J Surg.
97:1772–1783. 2010. View
Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
26
|
Camarillo DB, Krummel TM and Salisbury JK
Jr: Robotic technology in surgery: Past, present, and future. Am J
Surg. 188((4A Suppl)): 2S–15S. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
27
|
Magrina JF, Zanagnolo V, Noble BN, Kho RM
and Magtibay P: Robotic approach for ovarian cancer: Perioperative
and survival results and comparison with laparoscopy and
laparotomy. Gynecol Oncol. 121:100–105. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
28
|
Sert MB and Abeler V: Robot-assisted
laparoscopic radical hysterectomy: Comparison with total
laparoscopic hysterectomy and abdominal radical hysterectomy; one
surgeon's experience at the Norwegian Radium Hospital. Gynecol
Oncol. 121:600–604. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
29
|
Chong GO, Lee YH, Hong DG, Cho YL, Park IS
and Lee YS: Robot versus laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical
hysterectomy for cervical cancer: A comparison of the
intraoperative and perioperative results of a single surgeon's
initial experience. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 23:1145–1149. 2013.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
30
|
Coronado PJ, Fasero M, Magrina JF, Herraiz
MA and Vidart JA: Comparison of perioperative outcomes and cost
between robotic-assisted and conventional laparoscopy for
transperitoneal infrarenal para-aortic lymphadenectomy (TIPAL). J
Minim Invasive Gynecol. 21:674–681. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
31
|
Díaz-Feijoo B, Gil-Ibáñez B,
Pérez-Benavente A, Martínez-Gómez X, Colás E, Sánchez-Iglesias JL,
Cabrera-Díaz S, Puig-Puig O, Magrina JF and Gil-Moreno A:
Comparison of robotic-assisted vs conventional laparoscopy for
extraperitoneal paraaortic lymphadenectomy. Gynecol Oncol.
132:98–101. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
32
|
Chen CH, Chiu LH, Chen HH, Chan C and Liu
WM: Comparison of robotic approach, laparoscopic approach and
laparotomy in treating epithelial ovarian cancer. Int J Med Robot.
12:268–275. 2016. View
Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
33
|
Manchana T, Puangsricharoen P, Sirisabya
N, Worasethsin P, Vasuratna A, Termrungruanglert W and Tresukosol
D: Comparison of perioperative and oncologic outcomes with
laparotomy, and laparoscopic or robotic surgery for women with
endometrial cancer. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 16:5483–5488. 2015.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
34
|
Mäenpää MM, Nieminen K, Tomás EI, Laurila
M, Luukkaala TH and Mäenpää JU: Robotic-assisted vs traditional
laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: A randomized
controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 215:588.e1–588.e7. 2016.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
35
|
Mendivil AA, Rettenmaier MA, Abaid LN,
Brown JV III, Micha JP, Lopez KL and Goldstein BH: Survival rate
comparisons amongst cervical cancer patients treated with an open,
robotic-assisted or laparoscopic radical hysterectomy: A five year
experience. Surg Oncol. 25:66–71. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
36
|
Pellegrino A, Damiani GR, Loverro M,
Pirovano C, Fachechi G, Corso S and Trojano G: Comparison of
robotic and laparoscopic radical type-B and C hysterectomy for
cervical cancer: Long term-outcomes. Acta Biomed. 88:289–296.
2017.PubMed/NCBI
|
|
37
|
Nie JC, Yan AQ and Liu XS:
Robotic-assisted radical hysterectomy results in better surgical
outcomes compared with the traditional laparoscopic radical
hysterectomy for the treatment of cervical cancer. Int J Gynecol
Cancer. 27:1990–1999. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
38
|
Luo C, Liu M and Li X: Efficacy and safety
outcomes of robotic radical hysterectomy in Chinese older women
with cervical cancer compared with laparoscopic radical
hysterectomy. BMC Womens Health. 18:612018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
