Precision CT‑guided marking with India ink and microcoils for laparoscopic resection of a lateral lymph node recurrence of rectal cancer: A case report

Introduction

Lateral lymph node metastasis is a form of postoperative recurrence in lower rectal cancer. Local resection, radiotherapy, and systemic chemotherapy are indicated for the local recurrence of rectal cancer. Regarding solitary lateral lymph node recurrence, it is reported that it may offer a favorable long-term prognosis when treated with local resection (1). However, small tumors or lymph nodes can be difficult to detect due to their location in the deep pelvic region and the impact of reoperation. Furthermore, the resection margin is difficult to determine due to the presence of surrounding tissues. Therefore, CT-guided marking techniques, which are commonly used in pulmonary surgery, but are only rarely applied in abdominal surgeries (2), should be considered. India ink marking has been widely used and it is considered safe and effective (3). In the past, the effectiveness of CT-guided marking with India ink has been reported in abdominal surgery (4). In addition, CT-guided marking using microcoils has been reported to be safe and effective (5–7). Microcoil localization has the advantages of accuracy, high success rate, low complications, and good tolerance (8–10).

We herein report a case of laparoscopic resection of lateral lymph node recurrence of rectal cancer that was successfully treated with preoperative CT-guided marking with India ink and microcoils.

Case report

A 48-year-old man had undergone laparoscopic low anterior resection with D3 lymph node dissection and left lateral lymph node dissection for rectal cancer in September 2019 at the Japanese Red Cross Society Karatsu Red Cross Hospital (Karatsu, Japan). The tumor had mainly been located in the upper rectum above the peritoneal reflection. A digital rectal examination palpated the inferior margin of the tumor, 7 cm from the anus. The final findings were pT3N1bM0 and pStage IIIb according to the 8th edition of the UICC classification (11). Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy consisting of capecitabine was administered for 6 months. Oxaliplatin was not administered due to occupational reasons. However, at 6 months postoperatively, a solitary mass (diameter: 10 mm) was found in the left lateral region on enhanced abdominal computed tomography (CT), and he was diagnosed to have local recurrence because of an accompanying increase in the tumor marker levels. Systemic chemotherapy (irinotecan, S-1, and bevacizumab) was administered for 2 years. Stable disease persisted as the lesion decreased to 8 mm, and the carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) levels fell to within the normal range. Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography CT showed no accumulation of 18F-FDG (early SUVmax, 1.3; delayed SUVmax, 2.0). However, the lesion again increased in size to 10 mm at 3.5 years after surgery (Fig. 1A and B). FDG positron emission tomography CT showed the minor accumulation of 18F-FDG (early SUVmax 1.6, delayed SUVmax, 2.8). The patient's CEA and CA19-9 levels were within the normal ranges. No palpable tumorous lesions were observed on a digital rectal examination. The lesion had mildly increased in size, and PET-CT showed a minor accumulation. As a result, a relapse was suspected. Hence, percutaneous CT-guided biopsy was not considered due to the risk of dissemination. Resection of the solitary left lateral lymph node was considered, because no other new lesions had appeared. A high degree of operative difficulty was expected due to reoperation, the tumor location in the deep pelvis, and visibility problems regarding lesion identification. Therefore, preoperative marking with CT guidance was performed before surgery to ensure a secure and safe resection. Written informed consent was obtained for the CT-guided marking and surgical procedures. The patient was placed in a prone position on the CT table, and a 21-gauge needle was percutaneously inserted into the pelvis near the tumor. After local anesthesia, saline solution (2.0 ml) was topically injected near the tumor using a fine needle to maintain the space for placement of the microcoil so as not to injure the surrounding nerve and vasculature. India ink (1.0 ml) was injected between the tumor and the pelvic side, and two microcoils, originally designed for vascular embolization (Hilal Embolization Microcoil™, Cook Medical Japan), were implanted by a radiologist. The two coils were placed on either side (i.e., the interior and exterior) of the tumor on the morning of the surgery (Fig. 1C). The ureteral stent was placed by a urologist to avoid injury to the left ureter. Subsequently, laparoscopic surgery was performed. After the sharp dissection of adhesions between the large intestine and the pelvic wall, the left ureter was identified and preserved. A rectal examination was performed intraoperatively to avoid any rectal injury. After careful dissection, the targeted tumor was identified intraoperatively using the two embolization microcoils as landmarks and intraoperative fluoroscopy (Fig. 2). The embolization microcoils were not visible, but they were useful for identifying the extent of resection. The tumor was identified between the two coils and thus was successfully exfoliated with the surrounding fat. During resection, black ink was visibly identified (Fig. 3). Laparoscopic lymphadenectomy was completed within 5 h and 7 min with 100 ml of blood loss. The resected specimen was a solid nodule measuring 10 mm in size. The pathological diagnosis revealed no viable tumor cells in the dissected lymph nodes (Fig. 4). The patient was discharged on postoperative day 5 without any complications and remained disease-free for 7 months postoperatively.

Figure 1. Recurrent solitary lymph node on the left lateral pelvic region in computed tomography images. Yellow arrow and white arrowhead indicate the anastomosis of the low anterior resection and lateral lymph node tumor, respectively. (A) Horizontal plane. (B) Coronal plane. (C) Two microcoils (white arrows) were implanted near the interior and exterior of the lateral lymph node tumor. CT, computed tomography.

Figure 2. The two microcoils (white arrowheads) were clearly identified by fluoroscopy, and the tumor was recognized to be located between them.

Figure 3. The tumor (white arrowheads) was present in front of the India ink. After resecting the tumor, the India ink was identified (white arrows). The rectal wall is situated to the right of the laparoscopic forceps.

Figure 4. The pathological diagnosis revealed no viable tumor cells. (A) H&E; magnification, ×10. (B) H&E; magnification, ×100. H&E, hematoxylin and eosin.

Discussion

Postoperative pelvic recurrence is a clinical condition experienced by some patients after curative resection for rectal cancer. The indications for treatment are based on a comprehensive consideration of the number of recurrences, location, and postoperative period. Regarding lateral lymph node recurrence, it has been reported that even if lateral lymph node metastasis occurs, the disease can be controlled if there are <2 metastatic lymph nodes (12). Local resection can achieve a favorable long-term prognosis in patients with solitary lateral lymph node metastasis (1). Thus, surgical resection may be considered if the disease is localized and no other recurrent lesions are observed. However, surgical resection involves various procedural difficulties associated with reoperation, a location in the deep pelvis, and the visual identification of lesions.

Preoperative CT-guided marking for tumor identification is frequently reported to be effective for intraoperative identification of small tumors in the lung and for accurate surgical resection in respiratory surgery (13). However, there have been few reports on CT-guided marking in abdominal surgery, and its effectiveness and indications have not yet been established. The key issue is that lateral lymph node metastasis sometimes occurs in the deep pelvic space and after surgery. In this case, we considered that CT-guided marking may be effective for recognizing the target and resecting the tumor with sufficient surgical margins, as it was very small and the dissection layer was difficult to identify due to reoperation. A search of PubMed with the key words ‘preoperative’ and ‘CT-guided marking’ revealed one case report on preoperative CT-guided marking in abdominal surgery, which reported the efficacy of CT-guided marking with India ink and iopamidol for the recurrence of ascending colon cancer (diameter: 2 cm) in the right pararenal region (4).

Hookwire, ICG, India ink, and Lipiodol are often used for markings (14,15). India ink and microcoils were used in this study. India ink has been conventionally used, and its effectiveness and safety have been established (3). Because the ink is black, it is considered to have excellent visibility. However, there is concern that the ink may spread to the surrounding tissue and thereby obscure the objective. Moreover, such markings may not be visible during surgery. Therefore, microcoils were used to increase the chance of intraoperative confirmation and to accurately resect the tumor. Microcoils have been used for vascular embolization and have shown good tissue compatibility. In addition, such microcoils are soft and thus do not cause significant damage to the tissue after implantation into the body (16,17). CT-guided microcoils have been reported to be safe and effective tools for easy and fast video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (5–7). Therefore, we decided to use microcoils to treat this patient after obtaining sufficient written informed consent. As previously reported, iopamidol was used instead of the microcoils (4). However, there was a concern that it may not be visible on fluoroscopy because it could spread to the surrounding tissue and become diluted because it is a liquid. In addition, when performing preoperative CT-guided marking, careful examination is required to avoid complications such as bleeding and infection (18). As a result, X-ray fluoroscopy made it easy to recognize the markings and accurately resect the tumor laparoscopically. CT-guided marking with India ink and microcoils using fluoroscopy is useful for abdominal surgery. Although few reports have previously described this method, it may be useful for the curative resection of small tumors.

In conclusion, CT-guided marking with India ink and microcoils is useful for ensuring curative surgery for small tumors. To our knowledge, this is the first English case report of successful laparoscopic surgery using CT-guided marking with India ink and microcoils.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

Funding: No funding was received.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

Authors' contributions

All of the authors contributed to the diagnosis and treatment of the patient. SF and MH drafted the manuscript. TO, YT and RS edited the manuscript. RS supervised the study and approved the final version of the manuscript. MH and RS confirm the authenticity of all the raw data. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Patient consent for publication

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and accompanying images.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Glossary

Abbreviations

Abbreviations:

References