1
|
McCluggage WG, Singh N and Gilks CB: Key
changes to the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of
female genital tumours introduced in the 5th edition (2020).
Histopathology. 80:762–778. 2022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
2
|
Holl K, Nowakowski AM, Powell N,
McCluggage WG, Pirog EC, Collas De Souza S, Tjalma WA, Rosenlund M,
Fiander A, Castro Sánchez M, et al: Human papillomavirus prevalence
and type-distribution in cervical glandular neoplasias: Results
from a European multinational epidemiological study. Int J Cancer.
137:2858–2568. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
3
|
Qian XQ, Wang FF, Liang Y, Chen LL and Wan
XY: Gastric-type mucinous carcinoma with an abnormal increase of
CA199: A case report and literature review. Front Surg.
9:9459842022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
4
|
Kerwin CM, Markese M, Moroney MR, Smith LP
and Patel NU: Adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix, gastric-type
(GAS): A review of the literature focused on pathology and
multimodality imaging. Abdom Radiol (NY). 48:713–723. 2023.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
5
|
Talia KL and McCluggage WG: The developing
spectrum of gastric-type cervical glandular lesions. Pathology.
50:122–133. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
6
|
Greenland NY, Wolsky RJ, Darragh TM and
Vohra P: Gastric-type endocervical adenocarcinoma and cervical
cytology: Experience at a general hospital and review of the
literature. Cytopathology. 32:75–83. 2021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
7
|
Nishio S, Mikami Y, Tokunaga H, Yaegashi
N, Satoh T, Saito M, Okamoto A, Kasamatsu T, Miyamoto T, Shiozawa
T, et al: Analysis of gastric-type mucinous carcinoma of the
uterine cervix-An aggressive tumor with a poor prognosis: A
multi-institutional study. Gynecol Oncol. 153:13–19. 2019.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
8
|
Park SB, Lee JH, Lee YH, Song MJ, Lim KT,
Hong SR and Kim JK: Adenoma malignum of the uterine cervix: Imaging
features with clinicopathologic correlation. Acta Radiol.
54:113–120. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
9
|
Li G, Jiang W, Gui S and Xu C: Minimal
deviation adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix. Int J Gynecol
Obstet. 110:89–92. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar
|
10
|
McKelvey JL and Goodlin RR: Adenoma
malignum of the cervix. A cancer of deceptively innocent
histological pattern. Am Cancer Soc. 16:549–557. 1963.
|
11
|
Shi JP, Zhang DJ, Yu HY and Cui Q:
Assessing Intra-Lesion Microvascular Density in Patients with Early
and Mid-Late Stages of Cervical Squamous Cell Carcinoma by
Time-Intensity Curve of CEUS. Chin J Ultrasound Med. 3:319–322.
2022.(In Chinese).
|
12
|
Huang R, Wei L and Qin WH: Analysis of the
Value of Ultrasonographic Parameters and MVD for Differential
Diagnosis and Prognostic Evaluation of Cervical Cancer. The Pract J
Cancer. 38:39–41. 2023.
|
13
|
Wang J, Yang Q, Wang D, Li M and Zhang N:
Case report: Gastric-Type endocervical adenocarcinoma mimicking
submucosal myoma under hysteroscopy. Front Med (Lausanne).
9:8454452022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
14
|
Takatsu A, Shiozawa T, Miyamoto T,
Kurosawa K, Kashima H, Yamada T, Kaku T, Mikami Y, Kiyokawa T,
Tsuda H, et al: Preoperative differential diagnosis of minimal
deviation adenocarcinoma and lobular endocervical glandular
hyperplasia of the uterine cervix: A multicenter study of
clinicopathology and magnetic resonance imaging findings. Int J
Gynecol Cancer. 21:1287–1296. 2011.PubMed/NCBI
|
15
|
Tsuboyama T, Yamamoto K, Nakai G, Yamada
T, Fujiwara S, Terai Y, Ohmichi M and Narumi Y: A case of
gastric-type adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix associated with
lobular endocervical glandular hyperplasia: Radiologic-pathologic
correlation. Abdom Imaging. 40:459–465. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
16
|
Maniaci A, Fakhry N, Chiesa-Estomba C,
Lechien JR and Lavalle S: Synergizing ChatGPT and general AI for
enhanced medical diagnostic processes in head and neck imaging. Eur
Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 281:3297–3298. 2024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
17
|
Bhatla N, Aoki D, Sharma DN and
Sankaranarayanan R: Cancer of the cervix uteri: 2021 update. Int J
Gynecol Obstet. 155 (Suppl 1):S28–S44. 2021. View Article : Google Scholar
|
18
|
China association of professional
committee of pancreatic cancer, . China of diagnosis and treatment
of pancreatic cancer comprehensive guide (2020). Chin surg.
59:81–100. 2021.(In Chinese).
|
19
|
Xie YD, Xu CL, Yang B and Zhang LJ: Value
of time-intensity curve of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in early
diagnosis of cervical cancer. J Ultrasound Clin Med. 8:626–628.
2020.
|
20
|
Park KJ, Kim MH, Kim JK and Cho KS:
Gastric-Type adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix: Magnetic
resonance imaging features, clinical outcomes, and prognostic
factors. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 28:1203–1210. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
21
|
Kido A, Mikami Y, Koyama T, Kataoka M,
Shitano F, Konishi I and Togashi K: Magnetic resonance appearance
of gastric-type adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix in comparison
with that of usual-type endocervical adenocarcinoma: A pitfall of
newly described unusual subtype of endocervical adenocarcinoma. Int
J Gynecol Cancer. 24:1474–1479. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
22
|
Chen YP, Ho SP, Liou WS and Chen CJ:
Minimal deviation adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix. Taiwan J
Obstet Gynecol. 54:447–449. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
23
|
Ren WH, Zhao XL and Zhao FH: Global
guidelines for cervical cancer screening: A systematic review.
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 101:1882–1889. 2021.(In Chinese).
PubMed/NCBI
|
24
|
Pak SC, Martens M, Bekkers R, Crandon AJ,
Land R, Nicklin JL, Perrin LC and Obermair A: Pap smear screening
history of women with squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma of
the cervix. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 47:504–507. 2007.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
25
|
Kondo E, Takahashi A, Usami T, Yamamoto A,
Nomura H, Matoda M, Okamoto S, Omatsu K, Sugiyama Y and Takeshima
N: An analysis of Papanicolaou smear before treatment for
adenocarcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix in 65 cases. J Jpn Soc
Clin Cytol. 54:114–118. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar
|
26
|
Wada T, Ohishi Y, Kaku T, Aman M, Imamura
H, Yasutake N, Sonoda K, Kato K and Oda Y: Endocervical
adenocarcinoma with morphologic features of both usual and gastric
types: Clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical analyses and
High-risk HPV detection by in situ hybridization. Am J Surg Pathol.
41:696–705. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
27
|
Stolnicu S, Hoang L, Chiu D, Hanko-Bauer
O, Terinte C, Pesci A, Aviel-Ronen S, Kiyokawa T, Alvarado-Cabrero
I, Oliva E, et al: Clinical Outcomes of HPV-associated and
unassociated endocervical adenocarcinomas categorized by the
International endocervical adenocarcinoma criteria and
classification (IECC). Am J Surg Pathol. 43:466–474. 2019.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
28
|
D'Alessandro P, Giudicepietro A, Della
Corte L, Arduino B, Saccone G, Iacobelli A, Insabato L and Zullo F:
A case of gastric-type mucinous endocervical adenocarcinoma in
presence of nabothian cysts. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol.
236:254–255. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|