|
1
|
Hirsch DL, Garfein ES, Christensen AM,
Weimer KA, Saddeh PB and Levine JP: Use of computer-aided design
and computer-aided manufacturing to produce orthognathically ideal
surgical outcomes: A paradigm shift in head and neck
reconstruction. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 67:2115–2122. 2009.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
2
|
Chang EI, Jenkins MP, Patel SA and Topham
NS: Long-term operative outcomes of preoperative computed
tomography-guided virtual surgical planning for osteocutaneous free
flap mandible reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 137:619–623.
2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
3
|
Antony AK, Chen WF, Kolokythas A, Weimer
KA and Cohen MN: Use of virtual surgery and
stereolithography-guided osteotomy for mandibular reconstruction
with the free fibula. Plast Reconstr Surg. 128:1080–1084. 2011.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
4
|
Largo RD and Garvey PB: Updates in head
and neck reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 141:271e–285e. 2018.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
5
|
Ren W, Gao L, Li S, Chen C, Li F, Wang Q,
Zhi Y, Song J, Dou Z, Xue L and Zhi K: Virtual Planning and 3D
printing modeling for mandibular reconstruction with fibula free
flap. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 23:e359–e366. 2018.PubMed/NCBI
|
|
6
|
Wang YY, Zhang HQ, Fan S, Zhang DM, Huang
ZQ, Chen WL, Ye JT and Li JS: Mandibular reconstruction with the
vascularized fibula flap: Comparison of virtual planning surgery
and conventional surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 45:1400–1405.
2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
7
|
Toto JM, Chang EI, Agag R, Devarajan K,
Patel SA and Topham NS: Improved operative efficiency of free
fibula flap mandible reconstruction with patient-specific,
computer-guided preoperative planning. Head Neck. 37:1660–1664.
2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
8
|
Kumta S, Kumta M, Jain L, Purohit S and
Ummul R: A novel 3D template for mandible and maxilla
reconstruction: Rapid prototyping using stereolithography. Indian J
Plast Surg. 48:263–273. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
9
|
Avraham T, Franco P, Brecht LE, Ceradini
DJ, Saadeh PB, Hirsch DL and Levine JP: Functional outcomes of
virtually planned free fibula flap reconstruction of the mandible.
Plast Reconstr Surg. 134:628e–634e. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
10
|
Liu YF, Xu LW, Zhu HY and Liu SSY:
Technical procedures for template-guided surgery for mandibular
reconstruction based on digital design and manufacturing. Biomed
Eng Online. 13:632014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
11
|
Mazzoni S, Marchetti C, Sgarzani R,
Cipriani R, Scotti R and Ciocca L: Prosthetically guided
maxillofacial surgery: Evaluation of the accuracy of a surgical
guide and custom-made bone plate in oncology patients after
mandibular reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 131:1376–1385.
2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
12
|
Hanasono MM and Skoracki RJ:
Computer-assisted design and rapid prototype modeling in
microvascular mandible reconstruction. Laryngoscope. 123:597–604.
2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
13
|
Foley BD, Thayer WP, Honeybrook A, McKenna
S and Press S: Mandibular reconstruction using computer-aided
design and computer-aided manufacturing: An analysis of surgical
results. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 71:e111–e119. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
14
|
Pucci R, Weyh A, Smotherman C, Valentini
V, Bunnell A and Fernandes R: Accuracy of virtual planned surgery
versus conventional free-hand surgery for reconstruction of the
mandible with osteocutaneous free flaps. Int J Oral Maxillofac
Surg. 49:1153–1161. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
15
|
Rodby KA, Turin S, Jacobs RJ, Cruz JF,
Hassid VJ, Kolokythas A and Antony AK: Advances in oncologic head
and neck reconstruction: Systematic review and future
considerations of virtual surgical planning and computer aided
design/computer aided modeling. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg.
67:1171–1185. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
16
|
Dong QN, Karino M, Osako R, Ishizuka S,
Toda E, Kanayama J, Sato S, Okuma S, Okui T and Kanno T:
Computer-assisted fabrication of a cutting guide for marginal
mandibulectomy and a patient-specific mandibular reconstruction
plate: A case report. J Oral Maxillofac Surg Med Pathol.
33:505–512. 2021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
17
|
Ohyama Y, Hasegawa K, Uzawa N, Yamashiro
M, Michi Y, Inaba Y, Kubota M, Kanemaru T, Iwasaki T and Yoda T:
Vascularized bony reconstruction after mandibular resection-Report
and discussion of experience with 3 types of plates. Jpn J Oral
Maxillofac Surg. 69:493–498. 2023. View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
18
|
Metzler P, Geiger EJ, Alcon A, Ma X and
Steinbacher DM: Three-dimensional virtual surgery accuracy for free
fibula mandibular reconstruction: planned versus actual results. J
Oral Maxillofac Surg. 72:2601–2612. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
19
|
Zhang L, Liu Z, Li B, Yu H, Shen SG and
Wang X: Evaluation of computer-assisted mandibular reconstruction
with vascularized fibular flap compared to conventional surgery.
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 121:139–148. 2016.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
20
|
Boyd JB, Gullane PJ, Rotstein LE, Brown DH
and Irish JC: Classification of mandibular defects. Plast Reconstr
Surg. 92:1266–1275. 1993.PubMed/NCBI
|
|
21
|
Koyachi M, Sugahara K, Tachizawa K,
Nishiyama A, Odaka K, Matsunaga S, Sugimoto M and Katakura A:
Mixed-reality and computer-aided design/computer-aided
manufacturing technology for mandibular reconstruction: A case
description. Quant Imaging Med Surg. 13:4050–4056. 2023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
22
|
Blanc J, Fuchsmann C, Nistiriuc-Muntean V,
Jacquenot P, Philouze P and Ceruse P: Evaluation of virtual
surgical planning systems and customized devices in fibula free
flap mandibular reconstruction. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol.
276:3477–3486. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
23
|
Bartier S, Mazzaschi O, Benichou L and
Sauvaget E: Computer-assisted versus traditional technique in
fibular free-flap mandibular reconstruction: A CT symmetry study.
Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis. 138:23–27. 2021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
24
|
Jagtiani K, Gurav S, Singh G and Dholam K:
A review on the classification of mandibulectomy defects and
suggested criteria for a universal description. J Prosthet Dent.
132:270–277. 2024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
25
|
Hashikawa K, Yokoo S and Tahara S: Novel
classification system for oncological mandibular defect: CAT
classification. Jpn J Head Neck Cancer. 34:412–418. 2008.
|
|
26
|
Annino DJ Jr, Sethi RK, Hansen EE, Horne
S, Dey T, Rettig EM, Uppaluri R, Kass JI and Goguen LA: Virtual
planning and 3D-printed guides for mandibular reconstruction:
Factors impacting accuracy. Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol.
7:1798–1807. 2022. View
Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
27
|
Wang E, Durham JS, Anderson DW and Prisman
E: Clinical evaluation of an automated virtual surgical planning
platform for mandibular reconstruction. Head Neck. 42:3506–3514.
2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
28
|
Yang WF, Choi WS, Wong MCM, Powcharoen W,
Zhu WY, Tsoi JK, Chow M, Kwok KW and Su YX: Three-dimensionally
printed patient-specific surgical plates increase accuracy of
oncologic head and neck reconstruction versus conventional surgical
plates: A comparative study. Ann Surg Oncol. 28:363–375. 2021.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
