International Journal of Molecular Medicine is an international journal devoted to molecular mechanisms of human disease.
International Journal of Oncology is an international journal devoted to oncology research and cancer treatment.
Covers molecular medicine topics such as pharmacology, pathology, genetics, neuroscience, infectious diseases, molecular cardiology, and molecular surgery.
Oncology Reports is an international journal devoted to fundamental and applied research in Oncology.
Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine is an international journal devoted to laboratory and clinical medicine.
Oncology Letters is an international journal devoted to Experimental and Clinical Oncology.
Explores a wide range of biological and medical fields, including pharmacology, genetics, microbiology, neuroscience, and molecular cardiology.
International journal addressing all aspects of oncology research, from tumorigenesis and oncogenes to chemotherapy and metastasis.
Multidisciplinary open-access journal spanning biochemistry, genetics, neuroscience, environmental health, and synthetic biology.
Open-access journal combining biochemistry, pharmacology, immunology, and genetics to advance health through functional nutrition.
Publishes open-access research on using epigenetics to advance understanding and treatment of human disease.
An International Open Access Journal Devoted to General Medicine.
According to the latest tumor epidemiological statistics, prostate cancer (PCa) is still the most common tumor affecting male reproductive and urinary health, with its incidence rate and mortality ranking fourth and eighth, respectively (1). PCa progresses slowly in the early stages and surgical resection, radiation therapy and androgen deprivation therapy can effectively halt the progression of disease. However, approximately one-third of patients with PCa develop recurrence or metastasis after radical surgery. These patients can be treated with androgen-deprivation therapy, also known as castration therapy, which involves the administration of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists, or with surgical castration (2). Unfortunately, most patients develop disease progression again ~18 months after treatment and are no longer affected by androgen levels. Instead, the disease evolves into a more aggressive form of castration-resistant PCa, either metastatic castration-resistant disease or non-metastatic castration-resistant disease (3). The first-line treatment for castration-resistant PCa mainly includes the chemotherapy drug docetaxel along with novel endocrine drugs, such as abiraterone or enzalutamide (4). Although the early treatment response is good, drug resistance is still inevitable in the later stages and no effective treatment exists for these patients at present. Therefore, it is important to explore the molecular mechanisms of PCa progression (5).
Mitochondria are responsible for the synthesis of intracellular bioenergetics. In addition to the synthesis of ATP, mitochondria can also synthesize macromolecular metabolic precursors, such as lipids, proteins, DNA and RNA. Mitochondria can also remove or use metabolic waste, such as reactive oxygen species (ROS) and gases (6). Under normal physiological conditions, mitochondria are important cell pressure sensors and can coordinate cell adaptation to various stressors, such as nutrient deprivation, oxidative stress, DNA damage and endoplasmic reticulum stress. Therefore, mitochondria can maintain the growth and survival of tumor cells in harsh environments, including nutrient depletion, hypoxia and tumor treatment, which is a key factor in promoting tumor progression (7). An early study found that tumor cells still tended to undergo glycolysis under aerobic conditions, known as the Warburg effect, indicating that mitochondrial respiratory defects may be the fundamental cause of tumor development. In recent years, mitochondrial function and tumor metabolism reprogramming have received increasing attention (8). Researchers have found that the Warburg effect is not a characteristic of all cancer cells. Although damaged mitochondria may drive the Warburg effect in some cases, a number of tumor cells that exhibit Warburg metabolism also have complete mitochondrial respiration and some tumor subtypes also depend on mitochondrial respiration (7,9). Biosynthesis and other functions of mitochondria are typically upregulated in cancer and metabolic reprogramming has become an important tumor marker (10). The metabolic phenotype of prostate epithelial cells is unique and the stages of tumor development and progression from prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia to metastasis are different. Normal prostate epithelial cells are highly dependent on glycolysis, but during tumor progression, PCa cells gradually reactivate mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation while increasing glucose metabolism and reducing citrate production (11,12). In PCa, androgen receptors (ARs) also participate in cellular metabolic reprogramming, which includes aerobic glycolysis, mitochondrial respiration and de novo fat generation, thereby meeting the metabolic and biosynthetic needs of PCa cells (13,14).
In the present study, differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in PCa were first identified by analyzing three datasets: The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA)-prostate adenocarcinoma (PRAD), GSE46602 and GSE55945. This initial step focused on screening general DEGs (upregulated or downregulated) between PCa and adjacent normal tissues across the datasets, without restricting to mitochondrial relevance. To narrow down the identified DEGs to mitochondria-associated candidates, the first intersection was performed by overlapping these general PCa DEGs with the full list of human mitochondrial protein-coding genes from the MitoCarta3.0 database. This step yielded a preliminary set of differentially expressed mitochondrial-related genes (DeMRGs) but still included all genes that met both ‘differential expression in PCa’ and ‘mitochondrial localization’ criteria. To further refine and prioritize high-confidence targets, a second targeted intersection was conducted: The upregulated subset of the initially obtained DeMRGs was re-intersected with the MitoCarta3.0 mitochondrial gene list. This distinct step aimed to exclude potential false positives and focus specifically on consistently upregulated DeMRGs, a subset with stronger relevance to PCa progression as upregulated mitochondrial genes are more likely to drive pro-tumor metabolic reprogramming. Subsequently, Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) analyses were performed on these DeMRGs. The transcription factors and microRNAs (miRNAs) associated with the DEGs were also analyzed to provide a basis for further mechanistic studies. Furthermore, to explore the role of mitochondrial-related genes in PCa, the present study analyzed the correlation between key mitochondrial genes and immune infiltration through immune infiltration analysis. Additionally, it investigated the association of these genes with mitochondrial respiration and their relationship with mitochondrial metabolic pathways in PCa, aiming to identify potential mitochondrial hub genes involved in PCa progression.
The PCa cell lines (Du145, PC-3 and LNcap) and normal prostate cells (RWPE-1) purchased from American Type Culture Collection) were cultured in medium containing 10% fetal bovine serum (Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) at 37°C constant temperature and 5% CO2. Du145 cells were maintained in MEM (Biotecnómica), whereas PC-3 and LNcap were maintained in RPMI (Biotecnómica) and RWPE-1 was maintained in K-SFM (Biotecnómica).
Total RNA was extracted from the RWPE-1, PC-3, LNcap and Du145 cell lines using RNAiso Plus reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). cDNA was synthesized using a PrimeScript™ RT reagent kit (Takara Biotechnology Co., Ltd) at 42°C for 15 min and 85°C for 5 sec. Two-step qPCR was performed using SYBR Green Reagent (Takara Biotechnology Co., Ltd.), C1000 Touch Thermal Cycler and the CFX96 Real-Time System according to the manufacturer's instructions. The primer sequences are listed in Table I. The results were calculated using the 2−ΔΔCq method, and the data are expressed as a ratio of the control gene GAPDH (15).
RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq) data for patients with PCa were derived from the TCGA-PRAD dataset (TCGA-PRAD; http://www.cancer.gov/about-nci/organization/ccg/research/structural-genomics/tcga), which includes 502 cancer tissues and 52 adjacent tissues, and from two datasets provided by the National Center for Biotechnology Information Gene Expression Omnibus (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo): GSE46602 (consisting of 36 cancer tissues and 14 adjacent tissues) and GSE55945 (including sequencing data from 13 cancer tissues and 8 adjacent tissues) (16,17). In addition, the GSE70770 dataset was used as an independent validation cohort, which contains RNA-seq data for 220 PCa tissues and 73 adjacent non-cancerous tissues (18). Using R v4.2.2 (https://cran.r-project.org/), the array datasets were normalized using the limma package v3.58.1 and high-throughput sequencing count data were normalized using DESeq2 (version 3.20.0) to generate standardized matrices. Specifically, the DESeq function was applied for normalization, which accounts for library size differences and adjusts for gene-wise dispersion estimates. For genes with multiple transcript IDs, the ID with the highest average expression was selected. The original gene expression data underwent log2 transformation and quantile normalization for subsequent downstream analyses.
The DEGs found in PCa and adjacent tissues were analyzed using the limma and DESeq2 packages, with the following selection criteria: log2|fold change|≥1 and P<0.05. DeMRGs were identified by intersecting these DEGs (from TCGA-PRAD, GSE46602 and GSE55945) with 1,136 human mitochondrial protein-coding genes from MitoCarta3.0 (https://www.broadinstitute.org/mitocarta/mitocarta30-inventory-mammalian-mitochondrial-proteins-and-pathways), visualized via heat maps, Venn diagrams and volcano plots. GO (http://geneontology.org) and KEGG (https://www.genome.jp/kegg/kegg1.html) enrichment analyses of DeMRGs were performed using R's clusterProfiler package (v4.10.1). Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA; http://www.broadinstitute.org/gsea/) with KEGG gene sets (c2.cp.KEGG.v7.4.symbols.gmt from MSigDB; http://software.broadinstitute.org/gsea/msigdb/) was conducted, with significance defined as P<0.05 and false discovery rate <0.05. The transcription factors and interacting miRNAs of the identified DeMRGs were predicted using the online platform NetworkAnalyst 3.0 (https://www.networkanalyst.ca/) and visualized with Cytoscape software.
In the present study, PPI networks of DeMRGs were identified to determine the differences between PCa and its adjacent tissues from the perspective of protein interactions. First, the STRING online analysis tool (https://www.string-db.org/) was used to generate the PPI network of DeMRGs. Then, the PPI network was analyzed using Cytoscape software (https://cytoscape.org; CytoHubba plugin and DMNC; v3.10.0) and screened out genes with a degree value ≥4 as core genes for further research. The network type was full STRING. In total, six core data sources were integrated to ensure interaction reliability, including ‘experiments’, ‘databases’, ‘co-expression’, ‘neighborhood’, ‘gene fusion’ and ‘co-occurrence’. The interaction score was set to a confidence threshold of 0.4.
The TCGA-PRAD differential gene volcano plot was generated using R's ggplot2 (https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=ggplot2; v3.5.1). Core DeMRGs in TCGA-PRAD were obtained by intersecting TCGA-PRAD DEGs with core genes. For immune infiltration analysis, R was used to convert count data to transcripts per million (TPM), followed by the use of CIBERSORT (http://cibersort.stanford.edu; v3.15.0) to estimate 22 immune cell proportions (P<0.05 was considered reliable). The correlation between each hub gene and the 22 immune cell types was tested using Spearman's rank correlation analysis and visualized as lollipop plots. GSEA with KEGG analysis were used for functional enrichment. Using the GSE70770 dataset, the immune infiltration scores for 22 immune cell subsets were calculated via single-sample GSEA (ssGSEA) implemented through the R package Gene Set Variation Analysis (GSVA). Specifically, the GSVA package was used to run ssGSEA, which quantifies the enrichment level of each immune cell-associated gene set within individual samples of GSE70770, thereby generating the immune infiltration scores for each cell type. Paired t-tests were used to compare the immune scores of PCa and adjacent tissues, visualized as box plots with R's ggplot2. Immune cell composition was also plotted with R's ggplot2. Spearman correlation tests of genes and immune cells were visualized as heat maps using R's ComplexHeatmap (v1.0.12). To ensure the reliability of the observed correlations across different computational tools, R's psych package (v2.4.3) was used to compute correlation coefficients and P-values of core DeMRGs and immune cells; box plots showed the differences in the immune scores of high/low expression (samples with expression levels greater than or equal to the median were defined as the high expression subgroup, while those with expression levels below the median were designated as the low expression subgroup.) subgroups. Cluster analysis heat maps (using the pheatmap v1.0.12 function in R) illustrated the relationships between hub gene expression and immune cells. The correlations between the 6 core genes and immune cells were calculated using the R package Hmisc (v5.1–1).
Using MitoCarta3.0 and TCGA-PRAD data, paired t-tests were conducted to identify genes with significant differences (P<0.05) in oxidative respiratory chain complexes in cancer cells and adjacent tissues, visualized via R's ggplot2. Genes that were |statistical|>6 were correlated with the CIBERSORT immune infiltration results, with correlation heat maps generated using ggplot2. Spearman rank analysis was conducted to assess the correlations between the 6 hub genes and oxidative respiratory chain complex genes (|statistical|>4); these correlations were visualized using ggplot2. Linear regression was used to evaluate the pairwise relationships between the 4 selected hub genes and oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) genes. R's ggplot2 (stat_compare_means) was used to perform paired t-tests to analyze the expression of damage associated molecular patterns DAMPs genes (such as BCL2 and calreticulin) and immune receptor-related genes (such as toll-like receptor 2 and cyclic GMP-AMP synthase). Mantel tests and Pearson correlations were used to calculate the correlations between the 4 hub genes, mitochondrial metabolism and DAMPs.
SPSS 20.0 (IBM Corp.) was utilized to perform the statistical analyses. Data are shown as the mean ± standard error of the mean according to the results of three independent repeated experiments. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was employed to analyze differences in the expression levels of the 6 core DeMRGs [acetyl-CoA carboxylase β (ACACB), pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase 4 (PDK4), glycine amidinotransferase (GATM), methylcrotonyl-CoA carboxylase subunit 2 (MCCC2), mitochondrial ribosomal protein L12 (MRPL12) and fatty acid synthase (FASN)] in the four different cell lines, which were detected by RT-qPCR from three independent repeated experiments. Following the one-way ANOVA, the Tukey's honestly significant difference test was used as the post hoc test to perform pairwise comparisons between groups, ensuring the accurate identification of specific differences in gene expression levels among different cell lines and between different genes. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.
TCGA-PRAD contains RNA-seq data for 554 tissue samples, including 502 cancer tissues and 52 adjacent tissues. Differential analysis identified 1,681 genes that were significantly downregulated and 1,216 genes that were significantly upregulated in PCa. The DEGs were intersected with human mitochondrial genes in the MitoCarta3.0 database to obtain 60 intersecting genes, including 34 significantly upregulated and 26 significantly downregulated genes. The top 9 DeMRGs are shown in Fig. 1A. Similarly, 523 genes were significantly downregulated and 323 genes were significantly upregulated in PCa in GSE46606 and 337 genes were significantly downregulated and 191 genes were significantly upregulated in PCa in GSE55945. After taking the intersection of these DEGs with the MitoCarta3.0 database, 23 significantly upregulated and 22 significantly downregulated genes were identified in GSE46602, while 4 significantly upregulated and 23 significantly downregulated genes were identified in GSE55945 (Fig. 1A). After conducting a differential analysis using the training set (TCGA-PRAD, GSE 46606 and GSE55945), To specifically screen for high-confidence upregulated mitochondria-related genes in PCa, the upregulated subset of the initially identified 60 DeMRGs (from intersecting general PCa DEGs with MitoCarta3.0 mitochondrial genes) was further intersected with the human mitochondrial genes in the MitoCarta3.0 database. This targeted refinement yielded 6 core upregulated mitochondrial genes, which were selected for subsequent functional and correlation analyses. The 6 mitochondrial genes in GSE55945 and GSE46602 are presented as heat maps (Fig. 1B).
GO analysis was performed on all significantly upregulated DeMRGs (54 genes) in the three datasets, including in terms of molecular function, biological process and cell component. This analysis showed that the DeMRGs significantly upregulated in PCa were related to ‘nucleotide phosphate metabolic process’, ‘oxidative phosphorylation’, ‘mitochondrial transport’, ‘mitochondrial transmembrane transport’ and ‘ribosomes’ (Fig. S1A). By contrast, the 63 significantly downregulated DeMRGs in PCa were associated with ‘small molecule catabolic process’, ‘organic acid biosynthetic process’ and ‘mitochondrial gene expression’ (Fig. S1B).
KEGG analysis and GSEA showed that the upregulated DeMRGs were enriched in multiple metabolic pathways and were associated with multiple diseases, including ‘Huntington’ disease’, ‘Parkinson disease’ and ‘prion diseases’ (Fig. 2A and B). Similarly, the KEGG and GSEA results showed that the downregulated DeMRGs were enriched in multiple metabolic pathways and ‘PPAR signaling pathway’ (Fig. 2C and D). A PPI network was constructed using the STRING website to analyze the 54 upregulated genes and Cytoscape analysis was used to screen out 18 core genes with a degree value >4 (Fig. 3A). Subsequently, NetworkAnalyst 3.0 was used to predict the transcription factors and interacting miRNAs of these 18 genes (Fig. 3B). Similarly, the 63 downregulated genes were used to construct a PPI network through the STRING website and 16 genes were screened out based on a degree value >4 (Fig. 3C). The predicted transcription factors and interacting miRNAs of these 16 genes were also screened out (Fig. 3D). The results collectively suggest that the core genes selected in the present study are related to multiple transcription factors and miRNAs.
The TPM expression matrix of PCa tissue (502 cases) was used to calculate its immune score using the CIBERSORT deconvolution algorithm. The genes examined are the intersection of the 60 DeMRGs in TCGA-PRAD and the 34 core upregulated genes selected earlier, resulting in 15 intersection genes, which were the core DeMRGs of TCGA-PRAD. Subsequently, using the TPM expression matrix of PCa tissues (502 cases) from TCGA-PRAD dataset, the proportions of 22 immune cell subsets were first estimated via the CIBERSORT deconvolution algorithm to generate immune infiltration profiles. On this basis, a correlation analysis was further performed between these 15 intersection genes and the aforementioned immune infiltration results (Fig. 4A). It can be observed that there are significant differences in the positive and negative correlations between different immune cells and specific genes. These differences help to reveal the association between immune cell functions and gene expression, and provide references for research on tumor immune regulation, gene functions and other related fields. The 6 genes most closely related to immunity were screened out, as shown in Fig. 4B. The differences in the expression of the 6 genes in PCa and adjacent tissues were significant. ACACB, PDK4 and GATM were downregulated in PCa, while MCCC2, MRPL12 and FASN were upregulated in PCa. Lollipop plots of the 6 genes were constructed and the results showed a significant negative correlation between MRPL12 and quiescent CD4 memory T cells, memory B cells and M1 macrophage infiltration, while the trend was the opposite for Tregs and NK-activated cells (P<0.05; Fig 4C). MCCC2 was significantly negatively correlated with the infiltration of memory B cells, activated dendritic cells and Tregs cells, while the trend was the opposite for plasma cells and stationary mast cells (P<0.05; Fig. 4D). A significant negative correlation was found between FASN and γ-δ T cells, quiescent CD4 memory T cells and memory B cells, while the opposite was found for plasma cells and M0 macrophages (P<0.05; Fig. 4E). PDK4 was significantly negatively correlated with Tregs, memory B cells and follicular helper T cells, while it was positively correlated with activated mast cells, resting CD4+ memory T cells and CD8 T cells (Fig. 4F). GATM was significantly negatively correlated with plasma cells and Tregs, while it was positively correlated with resting CD4+ memory T cells, resting dendritic cells and γ-δ T cells (Fig. 4G). ACACB was significantly negatively correlated with Tregs, plasma cells and M2 macrophages, while it was positively correlated with resting CD4+ memory T cells, resting dendritic cells and activated dendritic cells (Fig. 4H). Subsequently, a single-gene GSEA was conducted; the results showed that MCCC2, MRPL12 and FASN were negatively correlated with ‘KEGG_APOPTOSIS’, ‘KEGG_B_CELL_RECEPTOR_SIGNALING_PATHWAY’ and ‘KEGG_INTESINAL_IMMUNE_NETWORK_FOR_IGA_PRODUCTION’. However, ACACB, PDK4 and GATM showed the opposite results (Fig. S2). These results imply a close association between the core DeMRGs and infiltrating immune cells.
GSE70770 was used for validation, which included a total of 293 tissue samples: 220 PCa tissues and 73 adjacent cancer samples. The results showed that in PCa, the 6 genes were significantly downregulated in activated B cells, effector CD8 memory T cells, immature dendritic cells, mast cells and NK cells of PCa tissues compared with the adjacent cancer tissues (Fig. 5A). Next, the proportion of 26 immune cells in PCa and adjacent tissues were analyzed using the GSE70770 dataset (Fig. 5B). There were significant stratified differences in the proportions of different types of immune cells (such as activated B cells, activated CD4/CD8 T cells, macrophages and neutrophils) between the two types of tissues. These observed differences are suggestive of immune cell remodeling within the tumor microenvironment, thereby providing critical insights that hold value for investigating the molecular mechanisms underlying tumor immune escape and identifying candidate targets for immune-based therapeutic interventions. The correlation between the 6 core genes and immune cells were calculated using the Hmisc R package and displayed it in the form of a heat map (Fig. 5C). The results showed that these genes were correlated (P<0.001) with NK cells, NK-T cells, B cells, dendritic cells, mast cells and CD8 memory T cells. The correlation coefficients and P-values for these 6 genes and the immune cells were calculated separately. The results showed that high expression of MCCC2, MRPL12 and FASN was associated with low expression of activated B cells, CD8 memory T cells, NK cells and NK-T cells. In addition, low expression of PDK4, ACACB and GATM was associated with low expression of activated B cells, CD8 memory T cells, NK cells and NK-T cells; the strongest immune correlation was with GATM (Fig. 6A). A heat map was used to visually display the differences between cancer and the adjacent immune cells, as well as the relationship between the expression levels of these 6 core genes and immune cells. The results showed that with low expression of PDK4 and GATM, memory B cells and CD4 memory T cells were highly expressed, while CD8 memory T cells showed lower expression levels (Fig. 6B).
Next, the TCGA-PRAD dataset was used to study the relationship between mitochondrial respiration and PCa as well as its relationship with the 6 core genes and selected statistically significant genes (P<0.05; Fig. 7A). Genes such as COX10, COX11 and COX14 were upregulated, while genes such as FOXRED1, AGOX3 and FMC1 showed a downward trend. Genes with |statistical|>6 were selected and their correlation with immune infiltrating cells was calculated using CIBERSORT. The results showed that these mitochondrial respiratory chain genes were negatively correlated with resting CD4 memory T cells and positively correlated with Tregs (Fig. 7B). Using the TCGA-PRAD dataset, the correlation between the 6 core genes and mitochondrial respiratory chain genes (|statistical|>4) was calculated. The results showed that MRPL12, PDK4, ACACB and GATM had the strongest correlation with mitochondrial respiration, and these 4 genes were selected as hub genes (Fig. 7C). The 6 mitochondrial respiratory chain genes most closely related to these 4 hub genes were then selected and a linear regression scatter plot was created. The results showed that MRPL12 was significantly positively correlated with TMEM186, UQCC3, COX7A1 and ATPAF1 (Fig. S3A), while PDK4, ACACB and GATM were positively correlated with COX7A1 and negatively correlated with TMEMI186, SDHAF3, UQCC3, COA7 and ATPAF1 (Fig. S3B-D). These results suggest that the core differential genes related to mitochondrial respiration are closely related to immune infiltrating cells in PCa.
The TCGA-PRAD dataset was then used to create violin plots to determine the differences between DAMP-related genes (11 genes) and immune receptor-related genes (21 genes) in PCa and adjacent tissues. Genes with significant differences were selected for further research (P<0.001; Fig. 8A). An analysis of the correlation between the 4 hub genes and significantly different DAMP-related genes and immune receptors showed that they have a strong correlation (Fig. 8B). To further investigate the potential correlation between the 4 hub genes (MRPL12, PDK4, ACACB and GATM) and DAMPs and mitochondrial metabolism, the Mantel test was used to analyze statistical significance. The results showed that they were closely related to the mitochondrial metabolic pathways in gluconeogenesis, the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle and pyruvate/ketone/lipid/amino acid metabolism in PCa (Fig. 8C).
Finally, expression of the core genes was validated using the RWPE-1 (the non-PCa cell line used for comparison), PC-3, LNcap and Du145 cell lines. The results showed that ACACB, PDK4 and GATM were downregulated in PCa, while MCCC2, MRPL12 and FASN were upregulated in PCa, consistent with the bioinformatics analysis (Fig. 9).
Mitochondria are the ‘power factories’ in cells, providing 80% of the energy required for cellular life activities. Mitochondria play an important role in maintaining normal physiological metabolism and body development and are involved in the occurrence and development of various diseases (such as breast cancer and renal cell carcinoma) (19). Variations in mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) sequences are common in certain tumors (such as ovarian cancer, oncocytoma and prostate cancer). Two types of mtDNA cancer variants can be identified: Novel mutations as oncogenic inducers and functional variants as adaptors, allowing cancer cells to grow in different environments. These mtDNA variants come from three sources: Familial variants, somatic mutations produced within each cell or individual and variants associated with ancient mtDNA lineages (haplotypes) that are considered to adapt to constantly changing tissues or geographical environments (20,21). In addition to mtDNA sequence mutations, mtDNA copy number and mtDNA sequence transfer to the nucleus may also lead to certain cancer types [such as breast epithelial cell lines, patient-derived xenograft models of triple-negative breast cancer and high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSC) and primary HGSC tumors] (22). There is a strong functional correlation between mtDNA mutations in eosinophilic tumors and PCa (21). In PCa, significant changes occur in the mitochondrial membrane, leading to the increased uptake of integrated membrane proteins. This process leads to increased rigidity and higher enzyme activity of cancer cell mitochondria (23). NKX3.1 is expressed in the prostate epithelium and its function is to protect the prostate from damage and inflammation as well as maintain the luminal prostate stem cells. In addition, it can regulate the expression of mitochondrial genes to promote mitochondrial homeostasis and prevent the occurrence of PCa (24).
Mitochondrial changes have a significant impact on the phenotype of prostate tumor cells. First, the progression of PCa is accompanied by an increase in ROS, which promotes its invasiveness. During the transformation and later stages of PCa development, PCa cells increase their mitochondrial respiration and glycolytic rates to meet energy needs. Due to enhanced mitochondrial respiration, ROS levels increase, inducing signaling pathways related to PCa growth and survival (25–27). Mitochondrial respiration and metabolism are related to PCa, while normal prostate epithelial cells are highly dependent on glycolysis and produce citrate from glucose. TCA cycle cannot effectively produce a large amount of citrate. During the transformation process, PCa cells gradually reactivate OXPHOS, increase glucose metabolism and reduce citrate production. In addition, the late stages of PCa are marked by an increase in TCA cycle and citrate levels, which are used by cancer cells for biomolecular synthesis to support their growth (28). Epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) provides enhanced migration and invasion capabilities for cancer cells, promoting tumor dissemination and metastasis. A study has shown that the downregulation of mitochondrial proteins involved in OXPHOS is associated with increased EMT and invasive disease characteristics (29). The changes in mitochondrial gene expression are also related to the growth, survival and drug resistance of PCa. Previous research has found that mitochondrial fission factor and dynamic related protein-1 are amplified in castration-resistant PCa, leading to low patient survival rates (29). In addition to serving as a power source for cells, mitochondria also play an important role in cell death pathways, such as apoptosis. Mitochondria are crucial in the activation of cell apoptosis through intrinsic pathways in response to excessive oxidative stress and DNA damage (30,31). Higher expression of Bcl-x is associated with higher-grade PCa tumors, as well as the presence of lymph node metastasis and distant metastasis. Given that Bcl-x is a key regulator of mitochondrial-mediated apoptosis, these findings further indicate that mitochondria play an important role in PCa immune escape (32,33).
In PCa, ARs reprogram the entire cellular metabolic pathway, including aerobic glycolysis and mitochondrial respiration, as well as de novo fat generation, to support the metabolic and biosynthetic needs of PCa cells (34,35). The m6A-mediated circular RNA (circ)RBM33-FMR1 complex can activate mitochondrial metabolism by stabilizing pyruvate dehydrogenase E1 subunit α1 mRNA, thereby promoting the progression of PCa and reducing the arylsulfatase family member I efficacy of circRBM33 in PCa treatment (36). Treatment targeting mitochondria may help with PCa as the naturally occurring amino acid 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA) immediately enhances mitochondrial ROS production after exposure to IR and reduces mitochondrial membrane potential by increasing intracellular PpIX (the metabolite of 5-ALA) in PC-3 and DU-145 PCA cell lines. IR is accompanied by mitochondrial dysfunction induced by 5-ALA and an increase in ATP production, which switches energy metabolism to a quiescent state. Under hypoxic conditions, IR induces ROS burst and mitochondrial dysfunction with 5-ALA to reduce cancer stemness and radiation resistance (37). RNA polymerase mitochondria (POLRMT) are crucial for mitochondrial transcription mechanisms and other mitochondrial functions. Upregulated POLRMT is important for PCa cell growth and mitochondrial POLRMT may serve as a target for PCa treatment (38).
In the present study, MRPL12, PDK4, ACACB and GATM were identified as hub genes. MRPL12 is a core component of the mitochondrial ribosome (mitoribosome), which is essential for synthesizing proteins encoded by mtDNA, including key subunits of the OXPHOS complex (39). In hepatocellular carcinoma, MRPL12 is upregulated via the PI3K/mTOR/YY1 pathway, which enhances OXPHOS and mitochondrial DNA content, thereby driving malignant phenotypes (39). PDK4 is a gene involved in fatty acid metabolism. Together with ACACB, FABP3 and other genes, it constitutes a metabolic gene signature for prostate cancer. By inhibiting the activity of the pyruvate dehydrogenase complex, PDK4 promotes glycolysis and suppresses OXPHOS, thereby supporting the Warburg effect in tumors (40). Following androgen receptor inhibition, PCa cells switch to a dependence on mitochondrial oxidative metabolism, and PDK4 may play a regulatory role in this process (41). ACACB is a rate-limiting enzyme in fatty acid synthesis and is involved in lipid metabolic reprogramming in prostate cancer. As a member of the same 5-gene metabolic signature as PDK4, its low expression is associated with high-risk PCa (40). Dysregulated lipid metabolism may promote immune evasion by altering the function of immune cells (such as CD8+ T cells) in the tumor microenvironment (42). GATM is involved in creatine synthesis, and its expression is associated with the MYC pathway and OXPHOS. In PCa, high GATM expression may lead to mitochondrial dysfunction (such as reduced aspartate levels), driving metabolic shifts toward glycolysis (43).
Despite the novel findings regarding mitochondrial hub genes in PCa, the present study has several limitations that should be acknowledged. First, the identification and validation of DeMRGs and hub genes relied heavily on publicly available datasets (TCGA-PRAD, GSE46602, GSE55945 and GSE70770) and in vitro experiments using established PCa cell lines (Du145, PC-3 and LNcap) and a normal prostate epithelial cell line (RWPE-1). The lack of primary PCa tissue samples from a patient cohort (such as clinical specimens with detailed pathological staging, treatment history and long-term follow-up data) limits the generalizability of the results to diverse clinical populations, as public datasets may have inherent biases in sample selection and data standardization. Second, the functional validation of the four hub genes (MRPL12, PDK4, ACACB and GATM) was limited to correlative analyses (such as associations with immune cell infiltration, mitochondrial respiration and metabolic pathways) and gene expression verification via RT-qPCR. No in-depth mechanistic experiments were performed to elucidate the direct roles of these hub genes in PCa progression, for instance, gain-of-function/loss-of-function assays (such as overexpression plasmids, small interfering RNA or CRISPR-Cas9) to assess changes in PCa cell proliferation, migration, invasion or mitochondrial function (such as mitochondrial membrane potential, ROS production and ATP levels) were not conducted. Additionally, in vivo validation using PCa xenograft models or genetically engineered mouse models was absent, which would be critical to confirm the in vivo relevance of these hub genes. In summary, while the present study provides a foundation for understanding the role of mitochondrial hub genes in PCa, future studies addressing these limitations, including large-scale clinical validation, mechanistic experiments and subtype-specific analyses, will be necessary to advance the translational potential of the findings.
In summary, the present study found that ACACB, PDK4 and GATM were downregulated, while MCCC2, MRPL12 and FASN are upregulated in PCa; among these genes, MCCC2 and FASN were linked to adverse PCa phenotypes and MRPL12, PDK4, ACACB and GATM showed the strongest associations with mitochondrial metabolic pathways in PCa, providing potential therapeutic targets for PCa treatment.
Not applicable.
This work was supported by Hunan Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (grant nos. 2025JJ50553 and 2025JJ80574) and Changsha Municipal Natural Science Foundation (grant no. kq2502330).
The data generated in the present study may be requested from the corresponding author.
SL and HS conducted most experiments and wrote the manuscript. LH, LL, YW conceived, designed and interpreted data. All authors edited the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript. SL and HS confirm the authenticity of all the raw data
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
|
Bray F, Laversanne M, Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Soerjomataram I and Jemal A: Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 74:229–263. 2024.PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Moris L, Cumberbatch MG, Van den Broeck T, Gandaglia G, Fossati N, Kelly B, Pal R, Briers E, Cornford P, De Santis M, et al: Benefits and risks of primary treatments for High-risk localized and locally advanced prostate cancer: An international multidisciplinary systematic review. Eur Urol. 77:614–627. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Rebello RJ, Oing C, Knudsen KE, Loeb S, Johnson DC, Reiter RE, Gillessen S, Van der Kwast T and Bristow RG: Prostate cancer. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 7:92021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Schaeffer E, Srinivas S, Antonarakis ES, Armstrong AJ, Bekelman JE, Cheng H, D'Amico AV, Davis BJ, Desai N, Dorff T, et al: NCCN guidelines insights: Prostate cancer, version 1.2021. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 19:134–143. 2021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Linder S, van der Poel HG, Bergman AM, Zwart W and Prekovic S: Enzalutamide therapy for advanced prostate cancer: Efficacy, resistance and beyond. Endocr Relat Cancer. 26:R31–R52. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Parida S, Pal I, Parekh A, Thakur B, Bharti R, Das S and Mandal M: GW627368X inhibits proliferation and induces apoptosis in cervical cancer by interfering with EP4/EGFR interactive signaling. Cell Death Dis. 7:e21542016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Sathya S, Sudhagar S, Sarathkumar B and Lakshmi BS: EGFR inhibition by pentacyclic triterpenes exhibit cell cycle and growth arrest in breast cancer cells. Life Sci. 95:53–62. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Kang H, Kim B, Park J, Youn H and Youn B: The Warburg effect on radioresistance: Survival beyond growth. Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Cancer. 1878:1889882023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Chen H, Zhou L, Wu X, Li R, Wen J, Sha J and Wen X: The PI3K/AKT pathway in the pathogenesis of prostate cancer. Front Biosci (Landmark Ed). 21:1084–1091. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Kumar R, Srinivasan S, Pahari P, Rohr J and Damodaran C: Activating stress-activated protein kinase-mediated cell death and inhibiting epidermal growth factor receptor signaling: A promising therapeutic strategy for prostate cancer. Mol Cancer Ther. 9:2488–2496. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Wu W, Yang Q, Fung KM, Humphreys MR, Brame LS, Cao A, Fang YT, Shih PT, Kropp BP and Lin HK: Linking γ-aminobutyric acid A receptor to epidermal growth factor receptor pathways activation in human prostate cancer. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 383:69–79. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Hirokawa N, Noda Y, Tanaka Y and Niwa S: Kinesin superfamily motor proteins and intracellular transport. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 10:682–696. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Drechsler H and McAinsh AD: Kinesin-12 motors cooperate to suppress microtubule catastrophes and drive the formation of parallel microtubule bundles. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 113:E1635–E1644. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Zhao H, Bo Q, Wu Z, Liu Q, Li Y, Zhang N, Guo H and Shi B: KIF15 promotes bladder cancer proliferation via the MEK-ERK signaling pathway. Cancer Manag Res. 11:1857–1868. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Livak KJ and Schmittgen TD: Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(−Delta Delta C(T)) method. Methods. 25:402–408. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Mortensen MM, Høyer S, Lynnerup AS, Ørntoft TF, Sørensen KD, Borre M and Dyrskjøt L: Expression profiling of prostate cancer tissue delineates genes associated with recurrence after prostatectomy. Sci Rep. 5:160182015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Arredouani MS, Lu B, Bhasin M, Eljanne M, Yue W, Mosquera JM, Bubley GJ, Li V, Rubin MA, Libermann TA and Sanda MG: Identification of the transcription factor single-minded homologue 2 as a potential biomarker and immunotherapy target in prostate cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 15:5794–5802. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Ross-Adams H, Lamb AD, Dunning MJ, Halim S, Lindberg J, Massie CM, Egevad LA, Russell R, Ramos-Montoya A, Vowler SL, et al: Integration of copy number and transcriptomics provides risk stratification in prostate cancer: A discovery and validation cohort study. EBioMedicine. 2:1133–1144. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Hocaoglu H and Sieber M: Mitochondrial respiratory quiescence: A new model for examining the role of mitochondrial metabolism in development. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 138:94–103. 2023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Boso D, Piga I, Trento C, Minuzzo S, Angi E, Iommarini L, Lazzarini E, Caporali L, Fiorini C, D'Angelo L, et al: Pathogenic mitochondrial DNA variants are associated with response to anti-VEGF therapy in ovarian cancer PDX models. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 43:3252024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Kopinski PK, Singh LN, Zhang S, Lott MT and Wallace DC: Mitochondrial DNA variation and cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 21:431–445. 2021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Kim M, Gorelick AN, Vàzquez-García I, Williams MJ, Salehi S, Shi H, Weiner AC, Ceglia N, Funnell T, Park T, et al: Single-cell mtDNA dynamics in tumors is driven by coregulation of nuclear and mitochondrial genomes. Nat Genet. 56:889–899. 2024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Zichri SB, Kolusheva S, Shames AI, Schneiderman EA, Poggio JL, Stein DE, Doubijensky E, Levy D, Orynbayeva Z and Jelinek R: Mitochondria membrane transformations in colon and prostate cancer and their biological implications. Biochim Biophys Acta Biomembr. 1863:1834712021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Papachristodoulou A, Rodriguez-Calero A, Panja S, Margolskee E, Virk RK, Milner TA, Martina LP, Kim JY, Di Bernardo M, Williams AB, et al: NKX3.1 Localization to mitochondria suppresses prostate cancer initiation. Cancer Discov. 11:2316–2333. 2021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Mamouni K, Kallifatidis G and Lokeshwar BL: Targeting mitochondrial metabolism in prostate cancer with triterpenoids. Int J Mol Sci. 22:24662021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Chen CL, Lin CY and Kung HJ: Targeting mitochondrial OXPHOS and their regulatory signals in prostate cancers. Int J Mol Sci. 22:134352021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Han C, Wang Z, Xu Y, Chen S, Han Y, Li L, Wang M and Jin X: Roles of reactive oxygen species in biological behaviors of prostate cancer. Biomed Res Int. 2020:12696242020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Wang H, Li N, Liu Q, Guo J, Pan Q, Cheng B, Xu J, Dong B, Yang G, Yang B, et al: Antiandrogen treatment induces stromal cell reprogramming to promote castration resistance in prostate cancer. Cancer Cell. 41:1345–1362.e9. 2023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Guerra F, Guaragnella N, Arbini AA, Bucci C, Giannattasio S and Moro L: Mitochondrial dysfunction: A novel potential driver of Epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition in cancer. Front Oncol. 7:2952017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Civenni G, Bosotti R, Timpanaro A, Vàzquez R, Merulla J, Pandit S, Rossi S, Albino D, Allegrini S, Mitra A, et al: Epigenetic control of mitochondrial fission enables Self-renewal of stem-like tumor cells in human prostate cancer. Cell Metab. 30:303–318.e6. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Jeong SY and Seol DW: The role of mitochondria in apoptosis. BMB Rep. 41:11–22. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Castilla C, Congregado B, Chinchón D, Torrubia FJ, Japón MA and Sáez C: Bcl-xL is overexpressed in hormone-resistant prostate cancer and promotes survival of LNCaP cells via interaction with proapoptotic Bak. Endocrinology. 147:4960–4967. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Krajewska M, Krajewski S, Epstein JI, Shabaik A, Sauvageot J, Song K, Kitada S and Reed JC: Immunohistochemical analysis of bcl-2, bax, bcl-X, and mcl-1 expression in prostate cancers. Am J Pathol. 148:1567–1576. 1996.PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Massie CE, Lynch A, Ramos-Montoya A, Boren J, Stark R, Fazli L, Warren A, Scott H, Madhu B, Sharma N, et al: The androgen receptor fuels prostate cancer by regulating central metabolism and biosynthesis. EMBO J. 30:2719–2733. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Audet-Walsh É, Dufour CR, Yee T, Zouanat FZ, Yan M, Kalloghlian G, Vernier M, Caron M, Bourque G, Scarlata E, et al: Nuclear mTOR acts as a transcriptional integrator of the androgen signaling pathway in prostate cancer. Genes Dev. 31:1228–1242. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Zhong C, Long Z, Yang T, Wang S, Zhong W, Hu F, Teoh JY, Lu J and Mao X: M6A-modified circRBM33 promotes prostate cancer progression via PDHA1-mediated mitochondrial respiration regulation and presents a potential target for ARSI therapy. Int J Biol Sci. 19:1543–1563. 2023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Owari T, Tanaka N, Nakai Y, Miyake M, Anai S, Kishi S, Mori S, Fujiwara-Tani R, Hojo Y, Mori T, et al: 5-Aminolevulinic acid overcomes hypoxia-induced radiation resistance by enhancing mitochondrial reactive oxygen species production in prostate cancer cells. Br J Cancer. 127:350–363. 2022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Li X, Yao L, Wang T, Gu X, Wu Y and Jiang T: Identification of the mitochondrial protein POLRMT as a potential therapeutic target of prostate cancer. Cell Death Dis. 14:6652023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Ji X, Yang Z, Li C, Zhu S, Zhang Y, Xue F, Sun S, Fu T, Ding C, Liu Y, et al: Mitochondrial ribosomal protein L12 potentiates hepatocellular carcinoma by regulating mitochondrial biogenesis and metabolic reprogramming. Metabolism. 152:1557612023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Fan Y, Wang J, Wang Y, Li Y, Wang S, Weng Y, Yang Q, Chen C, Lin L, Qiu Y, et al: Development and clinical validation of a novel 5 gene signature based on fatty acid Metabolism-related genes in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2022:32853932022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Crowell PD, Giafaglione JM, Jones AE, Nunley NM, Hashimoto T, Delcourt AML, Petcherski A, Agrawal R, Bernard MJ, Diaz JA, et al: MYC is a regulator of androgen receptor inhibition-induced metabolic requirements in prostate cancer. Cell Rep. 42:1132212023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Li L, Chao Z, Peng H, Hu Z, Wang Z and Zeng X: Tumor ABCC4-mediated release of PGE2 induces CD8+ T cell dysfunction and impairs PD-1 blockade in prostate cancer. Int J Biol Sci. 20:4424–4437. 2024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Löf C, Sultana N, Goel N, Heron S, Wahlström G, House A, Holopainen M, Käkelä R and Schleutker J: ANO7 expression in the prostate modulates mitochondrial function and lipid metabolism. Cell Commun Signal. 23:712025. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI |