The Mantle Cell Lymphoma International Prognostic Index: Does it work in routine practice?

  • Authors:
    • S. Y. Lim
    • J. M. Horsman
    • B. W. Hancock
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: January 1, 2010     https://doi.org/10.3892/ol_00000034
  • Pages: 187-188
Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

The Mantle Cell Lymphoma International Prognostic Index (MIPI) combines four factors to differentiate low-, intermediate- and high-risk prognostic groups in advanced mantle cell lymphoma using data from patients treated in clinical trials. To evaluate its use in routine practice, we applied the simplified index retrospectively to 50 consecutive new patients attending our lymphoma service. In the log-rank and multiple comparison statistical tests there was favorable differentiation between survival curves, and particularly between the high- and low-risk groups. We concluded that the MIPI is of value in routine lymphoma practice.
View Figures
View References

Related Articles

Journal Cover

January-February 2010
Volume 1 Issue 1

Print ISSN: 1792-1074
Online ISSN:1792-1082

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Lim SY, Horsman JM and Hancock BW: The Mantle Cell Lymphoma International Prognostic Index: Does it work in routine practice? . Oncol Lett 1: 187-188, 2010
APA
Lim, S.Y., Horsman, J.M., & Hancock, B.W. (2010). The Mantle Cell Lymphoma International Prognostic Index: Does it work in routine practice? . Oncology Letters, 1, 187-188. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol_00000034
MLA
Lim, S. Y., Horsman, J. M., Hancock, B. W."The Mantle Cell Lymphoma International Prognostic Index: Does it work in routine practice? ". Oncology Letters 1.1 (2010): 187-188.
Chicago
Lim, S. Y., Horsman, J. M., Hancock, B. W."The Mantle Cell Lymphoma International Prognostic Index: Does it work in routine practice? ". Oncology Letters 1, no. 1 (2010): 187-188. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol_00000034