Effects of low-frequency ultrasound and microbubbles on angiogenesis-associated proteins in subcutaneous tumors of nude mice

Shen,Zhi-Yong; Shen,E; Zhang,Ji-Zhen; Bai,Wen-Kun; Wang,Yu; Yang,Shao-Lin; Nan,Shu-Liang; Lin,Yan-Duan; Li,Yi; Hu,Bing

doi:10.3892/or.2013.2492

Effects of low-frequency ultrasound and microbubbles on angiogenesis-associated proteins in subcutaneous tumors of nude mice

Authors:
- Zhi-Yong Shen
- E Shen
- Ji-Zhen Zhang
- Wen-Kun Bai
- Yu Wang
- Shao-Lin Yang
- Shu-Liang Nan
- Yan-Duan Lin
- Yi Li
- Bing Hu
View Affiliations

Affiliations: Department of Ultrasound in Medicine, Shanghai Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200233, P.R. China
Published online on: May 23, 2013 https://doi.org/10.3892/or.2013.2492
Pages: 842-850

Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )

Metrics: Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )

Cited By (CrossRef): 0 citations Loading Articles...

Abstract

It has been shown that 1 and 3 MHz low-intensity ultrasound was able to affect the fragile and leaky angiogenic blood vessels in a tumor. However, the biological effects of 21 kHz low-intensity ultrasound on tumors remain unclear. The aim of the present study was to explore the effects of 21 kHz ultrasound with microbubbles on the regulation of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) and apoptosis in subcutaneous prostate tumors in nude mice. The study included three parts, each with 20 tumor-bearing nude mice. Twenty nude mice were divided into four groups: control (sham treatment), microbubble ultrasound contrast agent (UCA), low-frequency ultrasound (US) and US+UCA groups. The UCA used was a microbubble contrast agent (SonoVue). The parameter of ultrasound: 21 kHz, an intensity of 26 mW/cm2, 40% duty cycle (on 2 sec, off 3 sec), 3 min, once every other day for 2 weeks. In the first study, all subcutaneous tumors were examined by contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) at the initiation and completion of the experiments. Peak intensity (PI), time to peak intensity (TTP) and area under the curve (AUC) on the time intensity curve (TIC) were analyzed. In the second study, the intensity of VEGF and COX-2 protein expression in the vascular endothelium and cytoplasm was evaluated using immunohistochemistry and laser confocal microscopy. In the third study, terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase (TdT)-mediated dUTP nick end labeling (TUNEL) assay was used for the evaluation of cell apoptosis in tumor tissues. The tumor cells and vasculature were examined by transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Only in the US+UCA group, PI and AUC decreased. The intensity of COX-2 and VEGF in the US+UCA group in immunohistochemical staining and laser confocal microscopy was lower compared to that of the other three groups. More cell apoptosis was found in the US+UCA group compared to the other 3 groups. In the control, UCA and US groups, the tumors had intact vascular endothelium and vessel lumens in TEM. However, lumen occlusion of vessels was observed in the US+UCA group. Twenty-one kHz low-intensity ultrasound with microbubbles may have anti-angiogenic effects on subcutaneous tumors in nude mice.

View Figures

View References

1	Samant RS and Shevde LA: Recent advances in anti-angiogenic therapy of cancer. Oncotarget. 2:122–134. 2011.PubMed/NCBI
2	Sherwood LM, Parris EE and Folkman J: Tumor angiogenesis: therapeutic implications. N Engl J Med. 285:1182–1186. 1971. View Article : Google Scholar
3	Hwang JH, Brayman AA, Reidy MA, Matula TJ, Kimmey MB and Crum LA: Vascular effects induced by combined 1-MHz ultrasound and microbubble contrast agent treatments in vivo. Ultrasound Med Biol. 31:553–564. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
4	Skyba DM, Price RJ, Linka AZ, Skalak TC and Kaul S: Direct in vivo visualization of intravascular destruction of microbubbles by ultrasound and its local effects on tissue. Circulation. 98:290–293. 1998. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
5	Wood AKW, Ansaloni S, Ziemer LS, Lee WMF, Feldman MD and Sehgal CM: The antivascular action of physiotherapy ultrasound on murine tumors. Ultrasound Med Biol. 31:1403–1410. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
6	Wood AKW, Bunte RM, Price HE, et al: The disruption of murine tumor neovasculature by low-intensity ultrasound-comparison between 1- and 3-MHz sonication frequencies. Acad Radiol. 15:1133–1141. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
7	Wollina U, Heinig B, Naumann G, Scheibe A, Schmidt WD and Neugebauer R: Effects of low-frequency ultrasound on microcirculation in venous leg ulcers. Indian J Dermatol. 56:174–179. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
8	Barnett SB, Rott HD, ter Haar GR, Ziskin MC and Maeda K: The sensitivity of biological tissue to ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol. 23:805–812. 1997. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
9	Johnson CA, Sarwate S, Miller RJ and O’Brien WD Jr: A temporal study of ultrasound contrast agent-induced changes in capillary density. J Ultrasound Med. 29:1267–1275. 2010.PubMed/NCBI
10	Yang X and Church CC: A model for the dynamics of gas bubbles in soft tissue. J Acoust Soc Am. 118:3595–3606. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
11	Hutcheson J, Schlicher R, Hicks H and Prausnitz M: Saving cells from ultrasound-induced apoptosis: quantification of cell death and uptake following sonication and effects of targeted calcium chelation. Ultrasound Med Biol. 36:1008–1021. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
12	Lassau N, Chami L, Benatsou B, Peronneau P and Roche A: Dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (DCE-US) with quantification of tumor perfusion: a new diagnostic tool to evaluate the early effects of antiangiogenic treatment. Eur Radiol. 17:F89–F98. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar
13	Paprottka P, Cyran C, Zengel P, et al: Non-invasive contrast enhanced ultrasound for quantitative assessment of tumor microcirculation. Contrast mixed mode examination vs only contrast enhanced ultrasound examination. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc. 46:149–158. 2010.
14	Yu SM and Kim SJ: Endoplasmic reticulum stress (ER-stress) by 2-deoxy-D-glucose (2DG) reduces cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) expression and N-glycosylation and induces a loss of COX-2 activity via a Src kinase-dependent pathway in rabbit articular chondrocytes. Exp Mol Med. 42:777–786. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar
15	Forsberg F, Dicker AP, Thakur ML, et al: Comparing contrast-enhanced ultrasound to immunohistochemical markers of angiogenesis in a human melanoma xenograft model: preliminary results. Ultrasound Med Biol. 28:445–451. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar
16	Kotturi H, Li J, Branham-O’Connor M, et al: Tumor cells expressing a fusion protein of MULT1 and Fas are rejected in vivo by apoptosis and NK cell activation. Gene Ther. 15:1302–1310. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
17	Feril LB Jr and Kondo T: Biological effects of low intensity ultrasound: the mechanism involved, and its implications on therapy and on biosafety of ultrasound. J Radiat Res. 45:479–489. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
18	Miller DL and Dou C: Induction of apoptosis in sonoporation and ultrasonic gene transfer. Ultrasound Med Biol. 35:144–154. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
19	Forsberg F, Ro RJ, Fox TB, et al: Contrast enhanced maximum intensity projection ultrasound imaging for assessing angiogenesis in murine glioma and breast tumor models: a comparative study. Ultrasonics. 51:382–389. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar
20	Wang J, Lv F, Fei X, et al: Study on the characteristics of contrast-enhanced ultrasound and its utility in assessing the microvessel density in ovarian tumors or tumor-like lesions. Int J Biol Sci. 7:600–606. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
21	Wilhelm SM, Carter C, Tang LY, et al: BAY 43-9006 exhibits broad spectrum oral antitumor activity and targets the RAF/MEK/ERK pathway and receptor tyrosine kinases involved in tumor progression and angiogenesis. Cancer Res. 64:7099–7109. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
22	Lavisse S, Lejeune P, Rouffiac V, et al: Early quantitative evaluation of a tumor vasculature disruptive agent AVE8062 using dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasonography. Invest Radiol. 43:100–111. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar
23	Chan TA: Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, apoptosis, and colon-cancer chemoprevention. Lancet Oncol. 3:166–174. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
24	Lu J, Min W, Conchello JA, Xie XS and Lichtman JW: Super-resolution laser scanning microscopy through spatiotemporal modulation. Nano Lett. 9:3883–3889. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
25	Ashush H, Rozenszajn LA, Blass M, et al: Apoptosis induction of human myeloid leukemic cells by ultrasound exposure. Cancer Res. 60:1014–1020. 2000.
26	Honda H, Zhao QL and Kondo T: Effects of dissolved gases and an echo contrast agent on apoptosis induced by ultrasound and its mechanism via the mitochondria-caspase pathway. Ultrasound Med Biol. 28:673–682. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
27	Feril LB, Kondo T, Zhao QL, et al: Enhancement of ultrasound-induced apoptosis and cell lysis by echo-contrast agents. Ultrasound Med Biol. 29:331–337. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
28	Chen H, Brayman AA, Bailey MR and Matula TJ: Blood vessel rupture by cavitation. Urol Res. 38:321–326. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
29	Tian ZM, Wan MX, Lu MZ, Wang XD and Wang L: The alteration of protein profile of Walker 256 carinosarcoma cells during the apoptotic process induced by ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol. 31:121–128. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI