Progesterone protects ovarian cancer cells from cisplatin-induced inhibitory effects through progesterone receptor membrane component 1/2 as well as AKT signaling

Introduction

Ovarian cancer is associated with the highest mortality rate among women than all other gynecological cancers in the world (1). Surgery to remove as much of the tumor as possible following platinum-based chemotherapy are the standard methods used to cure the disease (1). Although these intense surgical and chemotherapeutic treatments ease the state of illness, ovarian cancer more often than not recurs with the neoplasm usually distributed throughout the peritoneum. Again, platinum-based chemotherapy is often used to treat recurrent ovarian cancers, yet, many the ovarian cancer cells are resistant to platinum-based agents. Multiple theories have attempted to explain why cancer cells are resistant to platinum-based chemotherapy. In the case of ovarian cancer, dysfunction of sex steroids such as progesterone (P4) may play an important role. Importantly, serum P4 levels are elevated in patients with ovarian cancer when compared with age-matched controls (2), and P4 levels are also higher in the peritoneal fluid of ovarian cancer patients (3). Epidemiologically, postmenopausal smokers with significantly elevated levels of P4 show a negative prognostic effect for ovarian cancer-specific survival, while the negative effect of smoking was found to diminish with increasing time since the point a former smoker stops smoking (4–6). Although the binding of P4 to the progesterone receptor (PGR) leads to a protective effect in vitro, the anti-apoptotic effect of P4 may be mediated by other less known receptors such as progesterone receptor membrane component 1 or 2 (PGRMC1/2). Research has demonstrated that P4 shows a significant anti-apoptotic effect through PGRMC1/2 in vitro and in vivo(7). These biphasic abilities of P4 to either induce or inhibit apoptosis could also explain why clinical trials have failed to show a beneficial effect of P4 on ovarian cancer progression. Regarding the ambiguous and crucial role of P4 in ovarian cancer, particularly in chemotherapy resistance, additional detailed mechanisms involved including PGRMC1/2 and signal pathways were thoroughly investigated in the present study.

Materials and methods

Cells and reagents

The ovarian cancer cell line HO-8910 (a human ovarian cancer cell line established from a patient with poorly-differentiated serous carcinoma) was obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Rockville, MD, USA). HO-8910 cells were sustained in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) (Invitrogen) with 10% (v/v) fetal bovine serum (FBS; Gibco), 100 IU/ml penicillin and 100 ng/ml streptomycin (PAA Laboratories GmbH, Pasching, Austria) in a 37°C, 5% CO2 humidified atmosphere. Cisplatin (CDDP) was a kind gift from Wei Zhu (Department of Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, China). Progesterone (P4) and the specific inhibitor of PI3K, LY294002, were purchased from Sigma (St. Louis, MO, USA).

MTT cell viability assay

Cell viability of HO-8910 cells was examined by MTT assays according to the standard methods. Briefly, HO-8910 cells were seeded onto a 96-well plate (2,000 cells/well). After 12 h, medium was replaced with conditional medium containing 10% FBS as well as DMSO, P4 (1 μM), CDDP (30 nM), or P4 (1 μM) plus CDDP (30 nM), respectively. After incubation for another 48 h, 15 μl MTT (1 μg/μl) was added into the medium. DMSO (200 μl/well) was used to dissolve the formazan product. Optical density was detected at a wavelength of 560 nm.

Cell cycle analysis

The cell cycle was analyzed by flow cytometry (Beckman Coulter, Inc., Miami, FL, USA) according to the standard methods and as previously described (8).

Wound healing assay

A monolayer of HO-8910 cells at 80% confluence supplied with DMEM containing 0.5% FBS in 12-well plates was scratched using a sterilized 10-μl pipette tip, washed and then subjected to P4 (1 μM), CDDP (30 nM), or P4 (1 μM) plus CDDP (30 nM), respectively. The migration of cells into the wound was imaged and monitored at 0, 12 and 24 h after treatment. The images were analyzed by Image-Pro Plus software (Media Cybernetics, Silver Spring, MD, USA). Results were obtained from three independent experiments.

Transwell chamber migration assay

Migration of HO-8910 cells through 8-μm pores was examined using a Transwell cell culture chamber (Corning Costar). The lower chamber was filled with DMEM containing 10% FBS. Cells (100 μl) at a density of 2×105/ml were seeded onto the upper chamber with the culture containing P4 (1 μM), CDDP (30 nM) or P4 (1 μM) plus CDDP (30 nM), respectively. Chambers were incubated for 18 h at 37°C. The cells remaining on the top surface of the membrane were removed with application of a cotton swab followed by three PBS washes. The cells on the bottom surface of the membrane were fixed, stained (0.1% crystal violet), and quantified by counting 5 fields on the membrane under a ×20 objective.

RT-PCR

RT-PCR was used to characterize the expression of PGR, PGRMC1 and PGRMC2 in HO-8910 cells. Using this protocol, total RNA was isolated from HO-8910 cells using the RNeasy Plus Mini kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA). To ensure no DNA contamination of the RNA, which could lead to false-positive results, the RNA samples were treated with DNase I (Invitrogen) before reverse transcription. Then cDNA was synthesized by incubating 1 μg of RNA with oligo-dT and Muloney murine leukemia virus reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen). Primers for the subsequent PCRs were as follows: PGR forward, 5′-GAT GCT ATA TTT TGC GCC TGA-3′ and reverse, 5′-CTC CTT TTT GCC TCA AAC CA-3′ (266 bp); PGRMC1 forward, 5′-GCA AGC TTT GGC GAA AAT CA-3′ and reverse, 5′-CCC CTC GCA TGT CCA ATC AT-3′ (121 bp); PGRMC2 forward, 5′-AGG GGA AGA ACC GTC AGA AT-3′ and reverse, 5′-AAG CCC CAC CAG ACA TTA CA-3′ (280 bp). Reaction times were: 1 min at 94°C then 35 cycles of 30 sec at 94°C, 30 sec at 60°C and 60 sec at 72°C, then 10 min at 72°C. The amplified products were resolved by electrophoresis on an ethidium bromide-treated 2% agarose gel. Finally, the relative level of gene expression was expressed as the ratio of the target gene mean value to the geometric mean value of the reference gene, β-actin.

Antibodies and western blot analysis

Anti-phospho-PTEN (Ser380) rabbit polyclonal antibodies (pAb), anti-PTEN rabbit pAb, anti-phospho-AKT (Ser473) mouse monoclonal antibodies (mAb), anti-AKT rabbit pAb, anti-phospho-GSK-3β (Ser9) rabbit pAb, anti-GSK-3β rabbit pAb were obtained from Cell Signaling Technology (Danvers, MA, USA). Anti-GAPDH mouse mAb, anti-α-tubulin mouse mAb, horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated goat anti-mouse and anti-rabbit IgG were products of Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA, USA). Western blot analysis was performed as previously described (9,10).

Statistical analysis

All experiments were performed at least in triplicate. Numerical data were expressed as the means ± SD. Two group comparisons were analyzed by the two-sided Student’s t-test. P-values were calculated and a P-value of <0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant result.

Results

Progesterone attenuates cisplatin-induced inhibition of proliferation and cell cycle arrest in ovarian cancer cells

To determine the effect of progesterone on the cytotoxic effect of cisplatin, HO-8910 cells in DMEM with 5% serum were exposed to P4 (1 μM), CDDP (30 nM), or P4 (1 μM) plus CDDP (30 nM), respectively. MTT assay was then carried out to examine the effect of progesterone on cell proliferation. P4 alone did not have any effect on cell proliferation, and CDDP alone significantly inhibited the proliferation of HO-8910 cells. Notably, in the presence of P4, the inhibition of proliferation by CDDP was significantly attenuated (Fig. 1A). Consistent with these results, CDDP alone induced cell cycle arrest with a lower percentage (15.90%) of cells in the S-phase when compared with these percentages in the cells exposed to P4 (37.38%) or the control (39.96%) (Fig. 1B). There was a higher fraction of P4 plus CDDP-treated cells in the S-phase (19.98%) than the fraction of cells treated with CDDP alone. Taken together, these data indicate that P4 attenuates the toxicity effect of CDDP in HO-8910 cells.

Figure 1 Progesterone attenuates cisplatin-induced inhibition of proliferation and cell cycle arrest in ovarian cancer HO-8910 cells. (A) MTT assay of the viability of HO-8910 cells treated with P4, CDDP or P4 plus CDDP, respectively. A representative column is shown from three independent experiments. (B) Flow cytometric analysis of the cell cycle distribution of the four groups. After serum starvation for 24 h, HO-8910 cells were treated with P4, CDDP or P4 plus CDDP, respectively. Following incubation in complete medium for 16 h, the cells were harvested and washed with PBS. The cell suspensions were treated and stained with propidium iodide followed by flow cytometric analysis of cell cycle distribution. A representative experiment is shown. The first peak corresponds to cells in the G0/G1 phase, the intermediary population to cells in the S-phase, and the second peak corresponds to cells in the G2/M-phase. Similar findings were observed in two repeated experiments.

Capability of migration and invasion are partially restored by progesterone in cisplatin-treated HO-8910 cells

To determine the effect of P4 on migration and invasion of CDDP-treated HO-8910 cells, a wound healing assay and a Transwell chamber invasion assay were carried out. In the wound healing assay, CDDP significantly inhibited the migration of HO-8910 cells, while P4 attenuated the effect of CDDP and partially restored the migratory capability of the HO-8910 cells. After 24 h of treatment, the area of the wound closure of the CDDP-treated HO-8910 cells was decreased from 82.74±0.66% of the control to 10.25±2.17%, while that of cells treated with P4 plus CDDP was increased to 24.28±3.94% compared with that of cells treated with CDDP alone (Fig. 2A). The same results were observed in the invasion assay. CDDP absolutely blocked the invasion of the HO-8910 cells from the upper to the lower chamber, however, P4 restored the action. After treatment of drugs for 18 h, the number of invasive CDDP-treated HO-8910 cells on the lower chamber was 2±1 per field, compared to the number of control or P4-treated cells which totaled 53±13 or 51±11 per field, respectively. Notably, the number of P4 plus CDDP-treated cells was increased to 17±6 per field (Fig. 2B).

Figure 2 The migration and invasion abilities of cisplatin-treated HO-8910 cells were partially restored by progesterone. (A) A monolayer of HO-8910 cells was scratched with a sterile pipette tip. Repair of the lesion by cell migration without or with P4 or CDDP were photographed for the initial wounding (0 h) and at 12 and 24 h post-wounding. The areas of the lesions of the cells were quantified at the given times (left). A histogram at 24 h post-wounding is presented with the means ± SE from three independent experiments (right). (B) Images of HO-8910 cells migrating through the porous membrane in the control, P4, CDDP and P4 plus CDDP groups (left). The average cell counts of invasive cells per 5 high powere fields (HPFs) in three groups (right). The data represent the results obtained from at least three independent experiments.

Multiple effect of progesterone on receptor expression profile in cisplatin-treated HO-8910 cells

Binding to receptors may be the initial step of progesterone to activate downstream signals and transcriptional factors. To determine the influence of P4 on the expression profile of PGR, PGRMC1 and PGRMC2, RT-PCR was carried out to detect the mRNA levels of these receptors in HO-8910 cells exposed to P4 (1 μM), CDDP (30 nM), or P4 (1 μM) plus CDDP (30 nM), respectively. In the present study, the data showed a consistent result with that of Albrecht et al(11). Treatment with CDDP alone induced an increase in PGRMC1 mRNA by ~102.67% compared to the control, while PGRMC2 mRNA was reduced by ~52.33%. Meanwhile, a significant upregulation of mRNA transcription of the PGR by CDDP alone was also observed (Fig. 3). Notably, we first observed that P4 significantly inhibited the mRNA transcription of PGRMC1 and PGR in the CDDP-treated cells, whereas CDDP enhanced mRNA transcription of PGRMC2 (Fig. 3). It appeared that the expression profile of PGR/PGRMC1/2 must be tightly correlated with the anti-apoptotic effect of P4 on CDDP-resistance.

Figure 3 Multiple effect of progesterone on the expression profile of receptors in ciaplatin-treated HO-8910 cells. (A) Total RNA was extracted from HO-8910 cells pretreated with P4, CDDP or P4 plus CDDP for 24 h, and RT-PCR with specific primers was carried out to detect the mRNA expression of PGR and PGRMC1/2. (B) Relative mRNA levels were normalized to that of β-actin by quantifying the optical density of the bands. The present data are consistent with another two independent experiments.

Progesterone upregulates AKT signaling in cisplatin-treated HO-8910 cells

PI3K/AKT signaling is a classical pathway which has been shown to be involved in many pathophysiological functions such as cell proliferation, migration, angiogenesis and tumorigenesis (12–14). Since we found that P4 rescued HO-8910 cells from CDDP-induced inhibitory effects, we inferred that PI3K/AKT signaling may be involved in this action. In the present study, immunoblot analysis showed that HO-8910 cells exposed to both P4 and CDDP (0.79-fold of activation normalized to the control) had a higher level of phos-AKT than the cells exposed to CDDP alone (0.37-fold of activation). Meanwhile, higher phos-PTEN and phos-GSK-3β were also detected; the value of phos-PTEN was 0.18–0.06 and that of phos-GSK-3β was 0.67–0.55, comparatively (Fig. 4). In the present study, we also found that P4 alone slightly downregulated the expression of phos-AKT, but the effect was not significant.

Figure 4 Progesterone upregulates AKT signaling in the cisplatin-treated HO-8910 cells. Phosphorylation of PI3K/PTEN/AKT/GSK-3β axis was detected by western blot analysis. HO-8910 cells treated with P4, CDDP or P4 plus CDDP for 48 h were lysed and subjected to the analysis.

Inhibition of PI3K/AKT signaling blocks the anti-apoptotic effects of progesterone in HO-8910 cells treated with cisplatin

To confirm the role of PI3K/AKT activation in the P4-mediated anti-apoptotic effects, LY294002, an inhibitor of PI3k/AKT signaling was added to the cell cultures before cell exposure to P4 (1 μM), CDDP (30 nM), or P4 (1 μM) plus CDDP (30 nM) as mentioned above. Inhibition of PI3K/AKT signaling by LY294002 significantly abrogated the anti-apoptotic effect of P4 in the CDDP-treated cells. Our data showed that HO-8910 cells treated with LY294002 had a high rate of apoptosis following addition of P4 (1 μM) plus CDDP (30 nM) to the culture compared to that of the cells without LY294002 treatment (Fig. 5A). Consistent with this observation, HO-8910 cells pretreated with LY294002 and following P4 plus CDDP exposure restored the capability of migration (Fig. 5B). These striking findings confirmed a central role of AKT in the protective effect of P4 in the CDDP-resistant ovarian cancer HO-8910 cells.

Figure 5 Inhibition of PI3K/AKT signaling blocks the restoration of cell viability and migration by progesterone in HO-8910 cells treated with cisplatin. (A) MTT assay of the viability of HO-8910 cells pretreated with CDDP or P4 plus CDDP following pretreatment with or without LY294002. (B) Migration of HO-8910 cells following treatment with CDDP or P4 plus CDDP and with pretreatment of LY294002 or without. Cells on the underside of the membrane were counted in a double-blind manner, from at least 5 high-power fields (HPFs) of three independent experiments.

Discussion

Ovarian cancer is the sixth most common cancer among women worldwide and is considered the leading cause of death from gynaecological malignancies in western countries (1,15). The occurrence and development of cancer is a complicated process; pathogenic organisms, inflammatory factors, hormones followed by signal alterations are responsible (16–22). Regarding ovarian cancer as an endocrine neoplasia, dysfunction of the hormone system should be particularly noted. Until recently, many researchers have focused on the functions of P4 in ovarian cancer. Several authors have shown a suppressive effect of P4 on cancer development (23). However, the biologic effects of P4 correspond to the concentration of the drug, as described by Syed et al who reported that P4 at low concentrations exerts a growth promoting action while P4 at higher concentrations exerts a growth inhibitory effect (24–27). In the present study, we used a dose of 1 μM P4 to detect its effect on CDDP-treated ovarian cancer cells. Our data revealed an anti-apoptotic effect of P4 with findings that P4 attenuated the toxic effect of CDDP and protected HO-8910 cells from CDDP-induced apoptosis in vitro. This finding is consistent with those reported by Peluso et al(28,29). Importantly, as a hallmark of cancer malignancy, migration and invasion of HO-8910 cells were also restored by P4 following CDDP treatment.

To date, the mechanism by which P4 confer its anti-proliferative effect has been elucidated. The progesterone receptor (PGR) which has been proven relevant to the progression of ovarian cancer patients is responsible for the action (30–32). PGR is normally highly expressed on ovarian epithelial cells, while a decline in expression indicates a malignant alteration. Since P4 can mediate its transcriptional activity through a consensus glucocorticoid response element (GRE), which is not found in the PGRMC1 promoter but in PGR ones (33), the antiproliferative effect of P4 may be due in part to the antagonism of the binding of P4 to PGR. The present study first revealed a lower expression of PGR in the HO-8910 cell line in concordance with other ovarian cancer cell lines as previously described (34). Notably, CDDP increases the level of PGR as well as PGRMC1, while conversely decreases the level of PGRMC2. Most importantly, in CDDP-treated HO-8910 cells, P4 completely reversed the receptor expression profile by decreasing the level of PGR and PGRMC1, while increasing the level of PGRMC2. These results suggest the possibility that PGRMC2 instead of PGRMC1 may be crucial to the anti-apoptotic effect of P4 in CDDP-resistant HO-8910 cells. PGRMC1 and PGRMC2 both contain a cytochrome b5-like heme/steroid-binding domain and belong to the membrane-associated progesterone receptor (MAPR) family (35). Currently, PGRMC1 which is highly expressed in ovarian cancer and other cancer cells and was claimed to play an important role in chemotherapy resistance, has been extensively characterized in in vitro studies. Comparably little is known about PGRMC2. PGRMC2, sharing an amino acid identity of ~89%, is strongly homologous to PGRMC1, particularly regarding the intracellular portion containing the cytochrome b5-like domain (35). The present data contradict the notion that PGRMC1 plays an important role in CDDP-resistance of P4 as reported by Peluso et al(29). Instead, our data support those of Albrecht et al(11) who reported that overexpression or knockdown of PGRMC1 had no effect on CDDP-induced apoptosis while overexpression of PGRMC2 induced significant CDDP resistance. Notably, a combination of P4 plus CDDP in the present study induced downregulation of PGRMC1 as well as PGR, while upregulating PGRMC2.

Given the high homology between PGRMC1 and 2, and the capability of both to interact with cytochrome P450 which has been shown to play a vital role in tumor progression and metastasis (36,37), the pathophysiological effect of PGRMC1/2 on carcinogenesis should be further studied.

In addition to the alteration of the hormone microenvironment, signaling pathways may also play a crucial role in the process of carcinogenesis. PI3K/AKT is a classical signal transduction pathway which has been found to be involved in many types of cancers, including ovarian. The abnormal activation of PI3K/AKT may lead to the consequent onset, maintenance and chemo-resistance of ovarian cancer (38,39). In the present study, significant activation of the PI3K/AKT pathway was detected in HO-8910 cells upon treatment with a combination of P4 and CDDP when compared with CDDP alone-treated cells. Notably, inhibition of the pathway by a chemical drug blocked the anti-apoptotic effect of P4 in CDDP-treated cells. Although, other signaling pathways may also play a role in the anti-apoptotic action of P4, PI3K/AKT signaling at least in part plays a role in this case.

Since PGRMC2 binds to cytochrome P450 proteins, 3A4 and 21A2, while the former is associated with the activation of PI3K/AKT signaling in endothelial cells, the promising crosstalk between the P4/PGRMC1/2 pathway and PI3K/AKT signaling should be further investigated.

Taken together, P4 protects ovarian cancer cells from CDDP-induced apoptosis through activation of PI3K/AKT survival signaling as well as by modulating the PGR/PGRMC1/2 expression profile. Thus, the clinical combination of PI3K/AKT signaling inhibitors or a PGRMC antagonist with platinum-based chemotherapy may benefit the state and prognosis of ovarian cancer patients.

Acknowledgements

The present study was supported by the Department of Laboratory Medicine of Jiangsu Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine.

References