Expression of estrogen receptor α and β in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

  • Authors:
    • Jing Dong
    • Shi-Wen Jiang
    • Yanru Niu
    • Ling Chen
    • Shuyan Liu
    • Tianzhong Ma
    • Xiancai Chen
    • Liyan Xu
    • Zhongjing Su
    • Haibin Chen
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: October 1, 2013     https://doi.org/10.3892/or.2013.2770
  • Pages: 2771-2776
Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

Estrogen receptors (ERs) are frequently expressed in human tumor tissues. There have been several studies concerning ER expression in esophageal cancers, yet the results are inconsistent, and the prognostic value of the receptors remains unclear. In the present study, we investigated the expression of ER protein and its correlation with clinical features of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients. Immunohistochemical staining for the ERs was carried out on paraffin-embedded primary tumor tissue sections from 89 patients with ESCC. Quantitative analyses were performed to determine the prognostic value of the expression of ERs, and Pearson's correlation was used to examine the relationship between ERα and ERβ expression levels. Our results showed that ERα immunoreactivity was significantly lower in ESCC than that in the non-neoplastic epithelium (P=0.0445), whereas the ERβ status was much stronger in ESCC than that in the non-neoplastic epithelium (P=0.0243). A significant inverse correlation was observed between ERα expression and depth of tumor invasion (P=0.0426). Correlation analysis revealed a statistically significant inverse correlation between the expression of ERα and ERβ in ESCC (r=-0.2902, P=0.0058). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that the patients with ERα expression (21/89) had a better outcome than patients without ERα expression (P=0.0280), whereas patients with high ERβ immunoreactivity (44/89) were significantly associated with worse survival (P=0.0366). In conclusion, ERα and ERβ levels were inversely correlated, and the downregulation of ERα and upregulation of ERβ may indicate unfavorable prognosis of ESCC.

Introduction

Human esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is one of the most aggressive malignancies. Prominent gender differences in the prevalence of ESCC have been demonstrated by most epidemiological studies. Esophageal cancer is generally more common among males than females, with a male to female ratio exceeding 3–4:1 (1). The prognosis of ESCC female patients is significantly better than that of male patients (2). While these data indicate the potential involvement of sex hormone-related pathways in the pathogenesis of ESCC, the relevant molecular events remain unclear.

Previous studies suggest a possible correlation between the estrogenic pathway and tumorigenesis and/or progression of ESCC (3,4). Esophageal cancer in females tends to occur postmenopausally, and the incidence rate for females increases with age (5). Sex steroids, such as estrogen, are well-known for their role(s) in the control of cell differentiation and proliferation in estrogen-dependent tissues such as breast and endometrial tissues. However, it is noteworthy that estrogens appear to play a pivotal role in several types of human malignancies that are not considered as classical, estrogen-dependent, neoplasms, such as lung (6,7), urinary bladder (8) and gastrointestinal tract malignancies (9,10). Consequently, estrogenic pathways may be involved in the regulation of the biological behavior of ESCC.

Human tissues contain two isoforms of ER, ERα and ERβ, which are generated by genes located on human chromosome 6q25 (11) and chromosome 14q22–24 (12), respectively. While several studies have identified the expression of ERs in ESCC (4,1319), the distribution patterns of ERα and ERβ as well as their clinical implication remain highly controversial (15,16,18,20). Accumulated data indicate a functional interaction between ERα and ERβ in human cells (21,22). Comprehensive comparison of the available data on ERα and ERβ expression in ESCC is difficult since they are determined separately in different studies using different methods. We considered that simultaneous determination of both ERα and ERβ expression will allow us to analyze the quantitative relationship between ERα and ERβ, which may have prognostic value for ESCC and aid in the better understanding of their involvement in the development of the malignant phenotype of ESCC.

The aim of this study was to determine the expression of ER protein and its correlation with clinical variables of ESCC patients.

Materials and methods

Ethics statement

The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Shantou University Medical College (Shantou, China), and only patients who provided written informed consent were included in the study.

Patients and tissues

Eighty-nine ESCC tissues were obtained from patients who underwent potentially curative esophagectomy from 2000 to 2006 at the Shantou Central Hospital (Shantou, China). These patients had received neither chemotherapy nor irradiation therapy prior to surgery. From these 89 cases, a total of 7 specimens of non-neoplastic epithelium were obtained for evaluating the expression of ERα, and 9 specimens were obtained for ERβ evaluation. These specimens had undergone tissue microarray (TMA) construction before immunohistochemical staining. Relevant clinical data were retrieved from careful review of the medical records. All of the tumors were confirmed as ESCC by pathologists in the Clinical Pathology Department of the Shantou Central Hospital. The pathological stage of each cancer was determined according to the TNM system, and each lesion was graded histologically according to World Health Organization classification. The median follow-up time was 30.8 months (range, 1.4–54.4 months).

Immunohistochemistry

Mouse monoclonal antibodies for ERα (F-10; dilution, 1:50) and ERβ (14C8; dilution, 1:100) were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc. and GeneTex Inc., respectively. Immunohistochemical staining was performed using the biotin streptavidin-peroxidase procedure as described previously (23).

Image analysis

Images were acquired using a Nikon microscope coupled to a Nikon DS-Fi1 digital camera (Nikon, Tokyo, Japan). Ten randomly selected discontinuous fields (x200) per slide were evaluated for each specimen. The positive area was stained yellow, and Image-Pro Plus software was used to quantify the integrated optical density (IOD). When evaluating the possible correlation between ER status and clinical outcome among individual patients, the cases were tentatively classified into two groups according to their ER IOD. A value of ERα IOD (range, 84–14,665) ≥5,200 was considered as positive expression and a value <5,200 was considered as negative expression. A value of ERβ IOD (range, 3,877–31,923) ≥18,000 was considered as high expression and a value <18,000 was considered as low expression.

Statistical analysis

Results are expressed as means ± SD. The statistical analyses between ER IOD and clinicopathological parameters of individual patients were carried out with the use of the Student’s t-test, one-way ANOVA test, the Mann-Whitney U test, the Kruskal-Wallis test and paired t-test. Statistical analyses between gender and other clinicopathological characteristics were assessed with the Fisher’s exact test. Correlation of ERα with ERβ was performed using Pearson’s correlation. Overall survival (OS) curves of the patients were generated according to the Kaplan-Meier method, and statistical significance was calculated using the Breslow test. Statistical differences were examined using SPSS software. Each P-value is two-tailed, and the significance level was set at P=0.05.

Results

Association between gender and clinicopathological parameters of the ESCC patients

The relationship between the gender of the patients and clinicopathological parameters are summarized in Table I. Females had a significantly older age at the onset of ESCC than that of males (P=0.0005). No significant association was detected between gender and tumor size, differentiation, depth of invasion, presence of lymph node metastasis or TNM classification of tumors.

Table I

Comparison of the clinicopathologic features between male and female esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients.

Table I

Comparison of the clinicopathologic features between male and female esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients.

Gender, n (%)

Clinical parametersMaleFemaleP-value
Age (years)a56.5±8.01063.8±7.2290.0005
Tumor size (cm)b0.129
 ≤337 (53)15 (79)
 >3 – ≤525 (36)3 (16)
 >58 (11)1 (5)
Histologic gradeb0.398
 G124 (34)4 (21)
 G240 (57)12 (63)
 G36 (9)3 (16)
Invasive depthb0.289
 T23 (4)2 (11)
 T3+T467 (96)17 (89)
LN metastasisb0.797
 N037 (53)9 (47)
 N1+N2+N333 (47)10 (53)
TNM classificationb0.615
 IB+IIA+IIB38 (54)9 (47)
 IIIA+IIIB+IIIC+IV32 (46)10 (53)

a Student’s t-test;

b Fisher’s exact test.

{ label (or @symbol) needed for fn[@id='tfn3-or-30-06-2771'] } Each P-value is two-tailed and the significant level was set at P=0.05. Data are presented as means ± SD. LN, lymph node.

Expression of ER protein in human esophageal non-neoplastic epithelium and carcinoma

Both ERα and ERβ were expressed in human esophageal non-neoplastic epithelium (Fig. 1A, B, E and F) with ratios of 3/7 and 6/9, respectively. ERα immunoreactivity was detected in the nuclei of carcinoma cells in 21/89 ESCC tissue samples. The mean value of ERα IOD in the 89 ESCC tissue samples was 3,741.0±2,978.6. ERβ immunoreactivity was detected in the nuclei of carcinoma cells in 87/89 ESCC tissue samples. The mean value of ERβ IOD in 89 ESCC tissue samples was 17,998.7±6,664.5.

Based on the staining intensity, ERα and ERβ displayed opposite immunostaining patterns. For ERα, most of the cells showed moderate immunostaining in non-neoplastic epithelium (Fig. 1A and B), whereas negative to weak signals were observed in ESCC (Fig. 1C and D). However, ERβ immunoreactivity was detected to be much weaker in the non-neoplastic epithelium (Fig. 1E and F) than in ESCC (Fig. 1G and H). The expression difference between non-neoplastic epithelium and ESCC was statistically significant for both ERα (P=0.0445) and ERβ (P=0.0243; Fig. 2A and B).

Association between the expression levels of the ERs and clinicopathological parameters of the ESCC patients

Associations between ER expression levels and clinicopathological parameters of the patients are summarized in Table II. There was a statistically significant inverse correlation between ERα IOD and invasive depth of the tumor (P=0.0426). No significant association was detected between ERα status and age, gender, tumor size, differentiation, presence of lymph node metastasis or TNM classification of tumors.

Table II

Association between ERα and ERβ and clinicopathological variables in 89 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients.

Table II

Association between ERα and ERβ and clinicopathological variables in 89 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients.

IOD

ERαERβ


Clinical parametersNMean ± SDP-valueaMean ± SDP-valueb
Age (years)0.58230.7437
 ≤5843 3,671.2±2,432.4 17,757.8±6,303.0
 >5846 3,806.3±3,437.9 18,223.9±7,047.7
Gender0.72640.7158
 Male70 3,557.7±2,702.0 17,863.6±6,842.6
 Female19 3,831.9±3,004.4 18,496.5±6,109.7
Tumor size (cm)0.34050.9545
 ≤352 3,573.8±3,068.8 17,899.4±6,768.9
 >3 – ≤528 3,388.4±2,183.5 18,299.6±6,599.9
 >59 4,551.4±2,408.9 17,636.0±6,995.5
Differentiation0.48800.7710
 G128 3,249.8±2,501.5 18,034.6±6,696.4
 G252 3,729.6±2,735.5 18,259.8±6,509.5
 G39 4,480.7±3,646.0 16,495.1±8,010.6
Invasive depth0.04260.2677
 T25 5,373.8±1,291.0 14,773.2±7,422.8
 T3+T484 3,511.1±2,787.2 18,190.7±6,616.0
LN metastasis0.93680.2964
 N046 3,593.9±2,508.5 17,281.6±6,602.0
 N1+N2+N343 3,640.9±3,020.3 18,765.8±6,722.8
TNM classification0.68230.1914
 I+II47 3,613.9±2,484.1 17,123.0±6,619.7
 III+IV42 3,620.2±3,053.8 18,978.6±6,656.1

a Mann-Whitney U test and Kruskal-Wallis test were used;

b Student’s t-test and one-way ANOVA test were used.

{ label (or @symbol) needed for fn[@id='tfn6-or-30-06-2771'] } Each P-value is two-tailed and significant level was set at P=0.05. Data are presented as means ± SD. ER, estrogen receptor; IOD, integrated optical density. LN, lymph node.

No significant association was detected between ERβ status and age, gender, tumor size, differentiation, invasive depth, presence of lymph node metastasis or TNM classification of tumors.

ERα expression is inversely correlated with ERβ expression in ESCC

Paired t-test showed that the expression of ERβ was much stronger than that of ERα (P=0.0000; Fig. 2C). There was also a statistically significant inverse correlation between the expression of ERα and ERβ in ESCC (r=−0.2902, P=0.0058).

ERα and ERβ expression is of prognostic value for ESCC patients

Patients with ERα expression had a more favorable outcome than that of patients without ERα expression (P=0.0280; Fig. 3A). However, high ERβ levels were found to be associated with unfavorable outcome (P=0.0366; Fig. 3B).

Discussion

In the present study, a significantly lower level of ERα immunoreactivity was detected in ESCC tissues than that in the normal esophageal tissues, which was consistent with the finding of Zuguchi et al(18). ER signaling via the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway phosphorylates EZH2 at S21, reducing levels of H3K27me3 in uterine myometrial cells (24). Meanwhile, the expression frequency and expression levels of H3K27me3 were significantly higher in ESCCs than in normal tissues, and high expression of EZH2 was correlated with tumor aggressiveness and adverse patient outcome in ESCC (25,26). Therefore, estrogen might exert a protective effect through ERα in esophageal squamous tissue. As for ERβ, Wang et al(20) reported that ERβ expression was correlated with lower malignant potential of ESCC. Nevertheless, we found a high frequency of ERβ expression in carcinomatous tissues than that in non-cancerous normal tissues. This is consistent with the results of Kalayarasan et al(16) showing that ERβ was overexpressed in poorly differentiated SCC and adenocarcinoma when compared to normal esophageal mucosa. In lung adenocarcinoma, ERβ-mediated estradiol was found to enhance epithelial mesenchymal transition through increased transcription of midkine (27). Thus, ERβ might also promote the process of ESCC by inducing epithelial mesenchymal transition. Meanwhile, several studies have demonstrated that the estrogenic action through ER signaling promotes the proliferation of carcinoma cells (6,28). For example, treatment with ERβ-specific agonist DPN led to a significant increase in the cell proliferation in primary urothelial cells, which predominantly expressed ERβ (8). From this point of view, our findings concerning the altered expression of ERα and ERβ may carry clinical implication for the treatment of ESCC. Reagents that upregulate the expression of ERα and/or downregulate the expression of ERβ may be useful for the chemotherapy of ESCC patients.

In this study, carcinomatous and non-cancerous normal tissues of the esophagus were used, and all of the ESCC tissues were obtained from patients who underwent esophagectomy. The majority of cases were at a relatively high pathological stage (T3). Therefore, T1 cases were lacked, and only 5 cases were classified as T2. The dynamic changes in ER expression throughout the progression of ESCC could not be monitored. Future investigations should include normal esophageal tissues, low-grade dysplasia and high-grade dysplastic tissues, particularly T1 and T2 cases, to elucidate the potential function of ERs in the progression of ESCC.

We addressed the prognostic value of ER protein expression for patients with ESCC in the present study. A significant inverse correlation between the status of ERα and the invasive depth of tumor was detected. The patients with ERα-positive expression had a more favorable outcome than patients without ERα expression. As for ERβ, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that high expression of ERβ in ESCC was significantly associated with unfavorable clinical outcome of patients. These results indicate that negativity for ERα and high expression of ERβ may be an unfavorable prognostic factor for ESCC patients. Since only immunohistochemistry was used in this study, further research using quantitative molecular methods are obviously required to clarify the prognostic value of ERs in ESCC.

McDonnell and Norris (21) reported that estrogenic signals through ERβ can inhibit ERα-dependent transcription when both ERα and ERβ are present in cells and are bound to estrogen. An inverse correlation between expression of ERα and that of ERβ was also demonstrated in lung cancer (22). In this study, we found that the expression of ERα was inversely correlated with that of ERβ, which indicates that there may be some functional interactions between ERα and ERβ in ESCC. To the best of our knowledge, this represents a novel observation that has not been previously reported.

Prominent gender differences in the prevalence of ESCC should not be ignored. In the present study, the age of onset for female ESCCpatients was significantly older than that of male patients. Zuguchi et al(18) postulated that the gender differences in the prevalence of ESCC might be due to lifestyle differences between male and female patients. However, the difference in the onset age and the fact that all of the 19 female ESCC patients were older than the average postmenopausal age could not be explained by lifestyle differences. Rather, the estrogen levels as well as differential distribution of ERα and ERβ may contribute to the age- and menopause-related changes in risk for the female population.

In conclusion, our study revealed that ERα was downregulated and ERβ was upregulated, and the expression of ERα was negatively associated with that of ERβ in ESCC. The absence of ERα and high expression of ERβ indicate a poorer prognosis of ESCC. The use of selective ER modulators may be clinically effective for the treatment of ESCC patients. Future investigations are needed to delineate the mechanisms that contribute to the loss of ERα expression and the overexpression of ERβ during the progression of ESCC.

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr Sima Sarvari for assistance with the manuscript preparation.

References

1 

Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E and Forman D: Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 61:69–90. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar

2 

Sugimachi K, Matsuoka H, Matsufuji H, Maekawa S, Kai H and Okudaira Y: Survival rates of women with carcinoma of the esophagus exceed those of men. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 164:541–544. 1987.PubMed/NCBI

3 

Matsuoka H, Sugimachi K, Ueo H, Kuwano H, Nakano S and Nakayama M: Sex hormone response of a newly established squamous cell line derived from clinical esophageal carcinoma. Cancer Res. 47:4134–4140. 1987.PubMed/NCBI

4 

Ueo H, Matsuoka H, Sugimachi K, Kuwano H, Mori M and Akiyoshi T: Inhibitory effects of estrogen on the growth of a human esophageal carcinoma cell line. Cancer Res. 50:7212–7215. 1990.PubMed/NCBI

5 

Derakhshan MH, Liptrot S, Paul J, Brown IL, Morrison D and McColl KE: Oesophageal and gastric intestinal-type adenocarcinomas show the same male predominance due to a 17 year delayed development in females. Gut. 58:16–23. 2009.PubMed/NCBI

6 

Niikawa H, Suzuki T, Miki Y, et al: Intratumoral estrogens and estrogen receptors in human non-small cell lung carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res. 14:4417–4426. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

7 

Mauro LV, Dalurzo M, Carlini MJ, et al: Estrogen receptor β and epidermal growth factor receptor as early-stage prognostic biomarkers of non-small cell lung cancer. Oncol Rep. 24:1331–1338. 2010.

8 

Teng J, Wang ZY, Jarrard DF and Bjorling DE: Roles of estrogen receptor alpha and beta in modulating urothelial cell proliferation. Endocr Relat Cancer. 15:351–364. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

9 

Rath-Wolfson L, Purim O, Ram E, Morgenstern S, Koren R and Brenner B: Expression of estrogen receptor β1 in colorectal cancer: Correlation with clinicopathological variables. Oncol Rep. 27:2017–2022. 2012.

10 

Hogan AM, Collins D, Baird AW and Winter DC: Estrogen and gastrointestinal malignancy. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 307:19–24. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

11 

Woo IS, Park MJ, Choi SW, et al: Loss of estrogen receptor-α expression is associated with hypermethylation near its ATG start codon in gastric cancer cell lines. Oncol Rep. 11:617–622. 2004.

12 

Peng B, Lu B, Leygue E and Murphy LC: Putative functional characteristics of human estrogen receptor-beta isoforms. J Mol Endocrinol. 30:13–29. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

13 

Utsumi Y, Nakamura T, Nagasue N, Kubota H and Morikawa S: Role of estrogen receptors in the growth of human esophageal carcinoma. Cancer. 64:88–93. 1989. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

14 

Utsumi Y, Nakamura T, Nagasue N, Kubota H, Harada T and Morikawa S: Effect of 17 beta-estradiol on the growth of an estrogen receptor-positive human esophageal carcinoma cell line. Cancer. 67:2284–2289. 1991. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

15 

Nozoe T, Oyama T, Takenoyama M, Hanagiri T, Sugio K and Yasumoto K: Significance of immunohistochemical expression of estrogen receptors alpha and beta in squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus. Clin Cancer Res. 13:4046–4050. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

16 

Kalayarasan R, Ananthakrishnan N, Kate V and Basu D: Estrogen and progesterone receptors in esophageal carcinoma. Dis Esophagus. 21:298–303. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

17 

Wang QM, Yuan L, Qi YJ, Ma ZY and Wang LD: Estrogen analogues: promising target for prevention and treatment of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in high risk areas. Med Sci Monit. 16:HY19–HY22. 2010.PubMed/NCBI

18 

Zuguchi M, Miki Y, Onodera Y, et al: Estrogen receptor alpha and beta in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer Sci. 103:1348–1355. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

19 

Yang H, Sukocheva OA, Hussey DJ and Watson DI: Estrogen, male dominance and esophageal adenocarcinoma: is there a link? World J Gastroenterol. 18:393–400. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

20 

Wang QM, Qi YJ, Jiang Q, Ma YF and Wang LD: Relevance of serum estradiol and estrogen receptor beta expression from a high-incidence area for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in China. Med Oncol. 28:188–193. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

21 

McDonnell DP and Norris JD: Connections and regulation of the human estrogen receptor. Science. 296:1642–1644. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

22 

Kawai H, Ishii A, Washiya K, et al: Estrogen receptor alpha and beta are prognostic factors in non-small cell lung cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 11:5084–5089. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

23 

Liu S, Zhu N and Chen H: Expression patterns of human DAB2IP protein in fetal tissues. Biotech Histochem. 87:350–359. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

24 

Bredfeldt TG, Greathouse KL, Safe SH, Hung MC, Bedford MT and Walker CL: Xenoestrogen-induced regulation of EZH2 and histone methylation via estrogen receptor signaling to PI3K/AKT. Mol Endocrinol. 24:993–1006. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

25 

He LR, Liu MZ, Li BK, et al: Prognostic impact of H3K27me3 expression on locoregional progression after chemoradiotherapy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. BMC Cancer. 9:4612009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

26 

He LR, Liu MZ, Li BK, et al: High expression of EZH2 is associated with tumor aggressiveness and poor prognosis in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy. Int J Cancer. 127:138–147. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

27 

Zhao G, Nie Y, Lv M, et al: ERbeta-mediated estradiol enhances epithelial mesenchymal transition of lung adenocarcinoma through increasing transcription of midkine. Mol Endocrinol. 26:1304–1315. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar

28 

Zhao G, Zhao S, Wang T, Zhang S, Lu K, Yu L and Hou Y: Estrogen receptor beta signaling regulates the progression of Chinese non-small cell lung cancer. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 124:47–57. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Related Articles

Journal Cover

December 2013
Volume 30 Issue 6

Print ISSN: 1021-335X
Online ISSN:1791-2431

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Dong J, Jiang S, Niu Y, Chen L, Liu S, Ma T, Chen X, Xu L, Su Z, Chen H, Chen H, et al: Expression of estrogen receptor α and β in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Oncol Rep 30: 2771-2776, 2013
APA
Dong, J., Jiang, S., Niu, Y., Chen, L., Liu, S., Ma, T. ... Chen, H. (2013). Expression of estrogen receptor α and β in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Oncology Reports, 30, 2771-2776. https://doi.org/10.3892/or.2013.2770
MLA
Dong, J., Jiang, S., Niu, Y., Chen, L., Liu, S., Ma, T., Chen, X., Xu, L., Su, Z., Chen, H."Expression of estrogen receptor α and β in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma". Oncology Reports 30.6 (2013): 2771-2776.
Chicago
Dong, J., Jiang, S., Niu, Y., Chen, L., Liu, S., Ma, T., Chen, X., Xu, L., Su, Z., Chen, H."Expression of estrogen receptor α and β in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma". Oncology Reports 30, no. 6 (2013): 2771-2776. https://doi.org/10.3892/or.2013.2770