Spandidos Publications Logo
  • About
    • About Spandidos
    • Aims and Scopes
    • Abstracting and Indexing
    • Editorial Policies
    • Reprints and Permissions
    • Job Opportunities
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Contact
  • Journals
    • All Journals
    • Oncology Letters
      • Oncology Letters
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • International Journal of Oncology
      • International Journal of Oncology
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Molecular and Clinical Oncology
      • Molecular and Clinical Oncology
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine
      • Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • International Journal of Molecular Medicine
      • International Journal of Molecular Medicine
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Biomedical Reports
      • Biomedical Reports
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Oncology Reports
      • Oncology Reports
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Molecular Medicine Reports
      • Molecular Medicine Reports
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • World Academy of Sciences Journal
      • World Academy of Sciences Journal
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • International Journal of Functional Nutrition
      • International Journal of Functional Nutrition
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • International Journal of Epigenetics
      • International Journal of Epigenetics
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Medicine International
      • Medicine International
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
  • Articles
  • Information
    • Information for Authors
    • Information for Reviewers
    • Information for Librarians
    • Information for Advertisers
    • Conferences
  • Language Editing
Spandidos Publications Logo
  • About
    • About Spandidos
    • Aims and Scopes
    • Abstracting and Indexing
    • Editorial Policies
    • Reprints and Permissions
    • Job Opportunities
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Contact
  • Journals
    • All Journals
    • Biomedical Reports
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • International Journal of Epigenetics
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • International Journal of Functional Nutrition
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • International Journal of Molecular Medicine
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • International Journal of Oncology
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Medicine International
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Molecular and Clinical Oncology
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Molecular Medicine Reports
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Oncology Letters
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Oncology Reports
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • World Academy of Sciences Journal
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
  • Articles
  • Information
    • For Authors
    • For Reviewers
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Conferences
  • Language Editing
Login Register Submit
  • This site uses cookies
  • You can change your cookie settings at any time by following the instructions in our Cookie Policy. To find out more, you may read our Privacy Policy.

    I agree
Search articles by DOI, keyword, author or affiliation
Search
Advanced Search
presentation
Oncology Reports
Join Editorial Board Propose a Special Issue
Print ISSN: 1021-335X Online ISSN: 1791-2431
Journal Cover
November-2016 Volume 36 Issue 5

Full Size Image

Sign up for eToc alerts
Recommend to Library

Journals

International Journal of Molecular Medicine

International Journal of Molecular Medicine

International Journal of Molecular Medicine is an international journal devoted to molecular mechanisms of human disease.

International Journal of Oncology

International Journal of Oncology

International Journal of Oncology is an international journal devoted to oncology research and cancer treatment.

Molecular Medicine Reports

Molecular Medicine Reports

Covers molecular medicine topics such as pharmacology, pathology, genetics, neuroscience, infectious diseases, molecular cardiology, and molecular surgery.

Oncology Reports

Oncology Reports

Oncology Reports is an international journal devoted to fundamental and applied research in Oncology.

Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine

Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine

Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine is an international journal devoted to laboratory and clinical medicine.

Oncology Letters

Oncology Letters

Oncology Letters is an international journal devoted to Experimental and Clinical Oncology.

Biomedical Reports

Biomedical Reports

Explores a wide range of biological and medical fields, including pharmacology, genetics, microbiology, neuroscience, and molecular cardiology.

Molecular and Clinical Oncology

Molecular and Clinical Oncology

International journal addressing all aspects of oncology research, from tumorigenesis and oncogenes to chemotherapy and metastasis.

World Academy of Sciences Journal

World Academy of Sciences Journal

Multidisciplinary open-access journal spanning biochemistry, genetics, neuroscience, environmental health, and synthetic biology.

International Journal of Functional Nutrition

International Journal of Functional Nutrition

Open-access journal combining biochemistry, pharmacology, immunology, and genetics to advance health through functional nutrition.

International Journal of Epigenetics

International Journal of Epigenetics

Publishes open-access research on using epigenetics to advance understanding and treatment of human disease.

Medicine International

Medicine International

An International Open Access Journal Devoted to General Medicine.

Journal Cover
November-2016 Volume 36 Issue 5

Full Size Image

Sign up for eToc alerts
Recommend to Library

  • Article
  • Citations
    • Cite This Article
    • Download Citation
    • Create Citation Alert
    • Remove Citation Alert
    • Cited By
  • Similar Articles
    • Related Articles (in Spandidos Publications)
    • Similar Articles (Google Scholar)
    • Similar Articles (PubMed)
  • Download PDF
  • Download XML
  • View XML
Article

Inhibition of Nox1 induces apoptosis by attenuating the AKT signaling pathway in oral squamous cell carcinoma cell lines

  • Authors:
    • Kunihiro Ito
    • Akinobu Ota
    • Takayuki Ono
    • Toshiki Nakaoka
    • Md. Wahiduzzaman
    • Sivasundaram Karnan
    • Hiroyuki Konishi
    • Akifumi Furuhashi
    • Tomio Hayashi
    • Yoichi Yamada
    • Yoshitaka Hosokawa
    • Yoshiaki Kazaoka
  • View Affiliations / Copyright

    Affiliations: Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Aichi Medical University Hospital, Aichi 480-1195, Japan, Department of Biochemistry, Aichi Medical University School of Medicine, Aichi 480-1195, Japan
  • Pages: 2991-2998
    |
    Published online on: September 5, 2016
       https://doi.org/10.3892/or.2016.5068
  • Expand metrics +
Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Metrics: Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Cited By (CrossRef): 0 citations Loading Articles...

This article is mentioned in:



Abstract

NADPH oxidases, also known as the Nox family, are major sources of reactive oxygen species generation that regulate redox-sensitive signaling pathways. Recent studies have implicated the Nox family in cancer development and progression. However, the involvement of its members in the development of oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) remains to be elucidated. To clarify this issue, we first analyzed mRNA expression of Nox/Duox family members (Nox1, Nox2, Nox3, Nox4, Nox5, Duox1 and Duox2) in five OSCC cell lines. Nox1 and Nox4 mRNAs were highly expressed in four OSCC cell lines. Western blot analysis revealed that the protein expression level of Nox1 was higher than that of Nox4 in the OSCC cell lines. In addition, knockdown of Nox1, but not Nox4, significantly suppressed cell viability and induced apoptosis in the HSC-2 and HSC-3 cells. We also found that a specific AKT inhibitor, perifosine, dose-dependently suppressed OSCC cell growth. Notably, Nox1 knockdown significantly attenuated the phosphorylation level of AKT. Furthermore, both Nox1 knockdown and perifosine treatment markedly enhanced the cisplatin-induced cytotoxic effect. Taken together, our results highlight that the Nox1/AKT signaling pathway plays an important role in cell survival in OSCC cells.

Introduction

Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) is the most common head and neck neoplasm affecting ~274,000 individuals worldwide (1). The 5-year survival rate of patients with OSCC is only 53% (1–3). The development of OSCC has been shown to be associated with oral habits including betel quid chewing, as well as tobacco and/or alcohol consumption, which lead to continuous generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) (4–6). Excessive ROS generation due to imbalances in the redox status mediates DNA damage and/or lipid peroxidation, which are thought to subsequently promote the development of OSCC (7). A recent study showed that oxidative stress markers, 8-hydroxy-2′-deoxyguanosin and malondialdehyde, were higher in the saliva of patients with OSCC than levels in the saliva of healthy normal subjects, while the antioxidant vitamins C and E were lower (8). Thus, accumulating evidence has implicated a role for ROS generation in the pathogenesis of OSCC.

Recently, the NADPH oxidase (Nox/Duox) family, a family of enzymes that generate ROS, has been shown to play an important role in cancer development and progression (9,10). To date, the roles of Nox1, Nox2, Nox4 and Nox5 in cancer have been implicated, while those of Duox1, Duox2 and Nox3 in carcinogenesis are not well-reported (9). Upregulated Nox1 expression and subsequent ROS generation was found to promote cancer cell growth, as well as escape from cancer cell death through the redox-dependent activation of p38MAPK and AKT signaling pathways (11). Given the experimental evidence that the Nox family plays a pivotal role in cancer cell development, it would be interesting to examine the involvement of Nox/Duox family members in the pathogenesis of OSCC.

In the present study, we found that Nox1 and Nox4 mRNAs were highly expressed in a significant subset of OSCC cell lines. Knockdown of Nox1 significantly induced apoptosis, and enhanced the cisplatin-induced cytotoxic effect in OSCC cells. Additionally, we report the underlying molecular mechanism responsible for this signaling.

Materials and methods

Reagents

Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) and penicillin-streptomycin were purchased from Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Ltd. (Osaka, Japan). Fetal bovine serum (FBS) was obtained from Nichirei Biosciences, Inc. (Tokyo, Japan). Diphenyleneiodonium (DPI), 2′,7′-dichlorofluorescein diacetate (DCFH-DA), N-acetylcysteine (NAC), MTT and ammonium pyrrolidine dithiocarbamate (PDTC) were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). AKT inhibitor, perifosine, was obtained from Cayman Chemical Co. (Ann Arbor, MI, USA). Propidium iodide (PI) was obtained from Merck Millipore (Billerica, MA, USA). Annexin V-FITC was obtained from MBL (Nagoya, Japan). Rabbit anti-NOX1 and anti-NOX4 antibodies were obtained from Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc. (Dallas, TX, USA). Anti-AKT, anti-phosphorylated-AKT (Ser473), anti-β-actin and HRP-conjugated anti-rabbit IgG were purchased from Cell Signaling Technologies Inc. (Beverly, MA, USA).

Cell culture

Five OSCC cell lines (HSC-2, HSC-3, HSC-4, SAS and OSC-19) were obtained from the Japanese Collection of Research Bioresources Cell Bank. HSC-2, HSC-3 and HSC-4 cell lines were established from individual patients with OSCC (12). The cell lines were maintained in DMEM supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated FBS and penicillin-streptomycin at 37°C in a 5% CO2 humidified atmosphere. The cells were detached from 90-mm dishes using trypsin and seeded in either 96- or 6-well plates for experimental purposes.

Cell viability MTT assay

The OSCC cells were seeded in 96-well plates (5×103 cells/well) and incubated for 24 h at 37°C. Then, the cells were incubated with medium containing the indicated concentrations of DPI, PDTC and NAC. After 72 h of incubation, MTT solution was added into each well. Following 4 h of incubation, lysis buffer (10% SDS in 0.01 M of hydrogen chloride) was added and incubated overnight. Finally, the absorbance at 550 nm was measured using a SpectraMax M5 spectrophotometer (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA, USA).

Annexin V assay

Apoptosis was evaluated using Annexin V (AxV)-FITC/PI double staining-based FACS analysis as previously described (13). Briefly, OSCC cells were seeded in 6-well plates (1×105 cells/well) and incubated for 24 h at 37°C. Then, the cells were incubated with the indicated concentrations of DPI followed by incubation in AxV-FITC and PI (10 µg/ml) at room temperature for 15 min. Finally, fluorescence intensities were determined by FACS using a FACSCanto II (BD, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA).

ROS assay

ROS generation was detected using DCFH-DA as previously described (14). Briefly, HSC-2 and HSC-3 cells were incubated with DPI (5 or 10 µmol/l). The cells were further incubated with the DCFH-DA fluorescent probe in the presence of DPI for 0.5 h. After 48 h incubation, the cells were examined using FACSCanto II, which analyzed 10,000 events (determined by forward and side scatter). Data are presented as mean fluorescence intensity of triplicate determinations ± SE.

RT-PCR analysis

The OSCC cells (1×105 cells/well) were seeded in 6-well plates. Following incubation for 48 h, total RNA was extracted from the cells using NucleoSpin® RNA (Takara Bio, Inc., Shiga, Japan), and 2 µg total RNA was reverse-transcribed with High-Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription kit (Life Technologies, Inc., Tokyo, Japan). mRNA expression levels of seven Nox/Duox family members (Nox1, Nox2, Nox3, Nox4, Nox5, Duox1 and Duox2) were examined using Veriti® Thermal Cycler (Applied Biosystems, Carlsbad, CA, USA) with specific primer sets as listed in Table I. mRNA expression of GAPDH was used as an internal control.

Table I

Primer sets for RT-PCR analyses.

Table I

Primer sets for RT-PCR analyses.

GeneSequence informationSize (bp)
Nox1Sense 5′-GGAGCAGGAATTGGGGTCAC236
Antisense 5′-TTGCTGTCCCATCCGGTGAG
TaqMan IDHs00246598_m1  98
Nox2Sense 5′-GGAGTTTCAAGATGCGTGGAAACTA550
Antisense 5′-GCCAGACTCAGAGTTGGAGATGCT
Nox3Sense 5′-GGATCGGAGTCACTCCCTTCGCTG458
Antisense 5′-ATGAACACCTCTGGGGTCAGCTGA
Nox4Sense 5′-CTCAGCGGAATCAATCAGCTGTG286
Antisense 5′-AGAGGAACACGACAATCAGCCTTAG
TaqMan IDHs00418356_m1109
Nox5Sense 5′-ATCAAGCGGCCCCCTTTTTTTCAC239
Antisense 5′-CTCATTGTCACACTCCTCGACAGC
Duox1Sense 5′-TTCACGCAGCTCTGTGTCAA  97
Antisense 5′-AGGGACAGATCATATCCTGGCT
Duox2Sense 5′-ACGCAGCTCTGTGTCAAAGGT  91
Antisense 5′-TGATGAACGAGACTCGACAGC
GAPDHSense 5′-GAGTCAACGGATTTGGTCGT185
Antisense 5′-GACAAGCTTCCCGTTCTCAG
TaqMan IDHs99999905_m1122
Quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR) analysis

HSC-2 and HSC-3 cells (1×105 cells/well) were seeded in 6-well plates and incubated for 24 h. The following day, real-time qRT-PCR analysis was performed using the StepOnePlus™ Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems). qRT-PCR analysis using TaqMan probes was performed according to the manufacturer's instructions. Gene specific TaqMan probes used in this study are listed in Table 1.

Western Blot analysis

HSC-2 and HSC-3 cells (2×105 cells/well) were incubated with DPI as described above. The cells were washed with ice-cold PBS and lysed in loading buffer [125 mmol/l Tris (pH 6.8), 4% SDS, 10% β-mercaptoethanol, 20% glycerol and 0.02% bromophenol blue]. Western blot analysis was performed as previously described (15). The relative protein levels were calculated after normalization to an internal control β-actin.

RNA interference

HSC-2 and HSC-3 cells (1×105 cells/well) were plated in 6-well plates. On the following day, the cells were transfected using Lipofectamine RNAi/MAX (Life Technologies Inc.) to deliver the indicated concentrations of Nox1 or Nox4 siRNA (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.) according to the manufacturer's protocol. siGENOME RISC-Free siRNA (Dharmacon-Thermo Fisher Scientific, Tokyo, Japan) was used as a negative control.

Statistical analysis

At least three independent experiments and three replications per experiment were performed. The results are expressed as the mean ± SE. Statistical significance between groups was determined using Student's t-tests. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 23.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Statistical significance was defined as P<0.05.

Results

ROS scavengers inhibit cellular growth in a panel of OSCC cell lines

To investigate the involvement of ROS in OSCC cell growth, we first examined whether a Nox inhibitor, DPI, as well as ROS scavengers, including PDTC and NAC, affect the cell survival in five OSCC cell lines, HSC-2, HSC-3, HSC-4, SAS and OSC-19. The MTT assay revealed that the cell viability was dose-dependently suppressed by treatment with DPI (Fig. 1A), PDTC (Fig. 1B) or NAC (Fig. 1C). The IC50 values ranged from 0.07 µM (SAS cells) to 1.59 µM (OSC-19 cells) for DPI, 40 µM (HSC-4 cells) to >100 µM (SAS cells) for PDTC and 2.53 mM (HSC-2 cells) to 14.0 mM (HSC-4 cells) for NAC among the OSCC cell lines tested (Table II). These results suggest that scavenging of ROS may suppress cell growth in OSCC cells.

Figure 1

Effect of DPI, PDTC and NAC on cell survival of OSCC cells. Five OSCC cell lines (HSC-2, HSC-3, HSC-4, OSC19 and SAS) were seeded into 96-well plates (2.5×103 cells/well). On the following day, the cells were treated with the indicated concentrations of (A) DPI (20, 10, 5, 2, 1, 0.5, 0.1 and 0.01 µM), (B) PDTC (100, 50, 20, 10, 5, 2, 1 and 0.2 µM) and (C) NAC (100, 50, 20, 10, 2, 1 and 0.2 µM) for 72 h. The percentage of cell survival of the five OSCC cell lines was measured by MTT assay. Data are expressed relative to the mean optical density (550 nm) in the untreated cells, which was arbitrarily defined as 100%. Data are represented as the mean ± SE (n=3).

Table II

IC50 values of the OSCC cell lines treated with DPI, PDTC or NAC.

Table II

IC50 values of the OSCC cell lines treated with DPI, PDTC or NAC.

Cell linesDPI
IC50 (μM)
PDTC
IC50 (μM)
NAC
IC50 (mM)
HSC21.05     44.12.53
HSC30.08     69.512.20
HSC40.24     40.014.00
OSC191.59     62.17.24
SAS0.07>100.012.90

[i] OSCC, oral squamous cell carcinoma; DPI, diphenyleneiodonium; PDTC, pyrrolidine dithiocarbamate; NAC, N-acetylcysteine.

Expression levels of the Nox/Duox family in OSCC cell lines

Since DPI reduced the cell viability in OSCC cells, we assumed that the Nox/Duox family plays an important role in cell survival. To clarify this issue, we first examined Nox/Duox mRNAs in five OSCC cell lines using RT-PCR analysis. As shown in Fig. 2A, while Nox1 and Nox4 mRNA expression was readily detected in four cell lines, except for OSC-19, Nox2 and Nox3 mRNA expression was primarily detected only in HSC-4 cells. Nox5 mRNA expression was detected in both SAS and OSC-19 cells (Fig. 2A). Additionally, Duox1 mRNA expression was detectable in all of the cell lines examined, while that of Duox2 was readily detected in the HSC-4 cells but diminished in the OSC-19, HSC-2 and HSC-3 cells (Fig. 2A). These results are summarized in Table III. We also examined protein expression of Nox1 and Nox4; Nox1 protein expression was elevated in the HSC-2 and HSC-3 cells, while Nox4 was slightly expressed in the five OSCC cell lines examined (Fig. 2B).

Figure 2

mRNA expression of Nox/Duox family members and protein expression of Nox1 and Nox4 in OSCC cell lines. Five OSCC cell lines (HSC-2, HSC-3, HSC-4, OSC-19 and SAS) were seeded in 6-well plates (1×105 cells/well) and incubated for 48 h. (A) mRNA expression of Nox/Duox family members (Nox1, Nox2, Nox3, Nox4, Nox5, Duox1 and Duox2) were analyzed using RT-PCR. mRNA expression of GAPDH was used as an internal control. Representative result of gel electrophoresis is shown. The results of RT-PCR analyses are summarized in Table III. (B) Protein expression of Nox1 and Nox4 was analyzed by western blotting. A total of 2 µg of cell lysate was subjected to western blot analysis to detect NOX1 or NOX4, while 1 µg was subjected to detect β-actin protein.

Table III

RT-PCR analysis of mRNA expression of the Nox/Duox family.

Table III

RT-PCR analysis of mRNA expression of the Nox/Duox family.

Nox family
Duox family
Cell linesNox1Nox2Nox3Nox4Nox5Duox1Duox2
SAS+−−+++−−
OSC-19−−−−+++
HSC-2+−−++−++
HSC-3++−−+−++
HSC-4++−+−+++
Nox inhibitor DPI suppresses ROS generation and induces apoptosis

To investigate the involvement of the Nox/Duox family in ROS generation, we further examined the effect of DPI on ROS generation in HSC-2 and HSC-3 cells. As expected, RO generation was significantly suppressed by DPI treatment (Fig. 3A and B). This result prompted us to further examine the effect of DPI on the induction of apoptosis in HSC-2 and HSC-3 cells. As shown in Fig. 3C, the percentages of AxV+/PI+ cells was significantly increased 48 h after DPI treatment in both the HSC-2 and HSC-3 cell lines, suggesting that the Nox family may play a role in the anti-apoptotic effect as well as ROS generation.

Figure 3

Inhibitory effects of DPI on ROS generation and apoptosis. (A and B) The effect of DPI on intracellular ROS generation. (A) Representative results of flow cytometic analyses using DCFH-DA probe in HSC-2 (left panel) and HSC-3 (right panel) cells. HSC-2 and HSC-3 cells (2×105 cells/well) were incubated with DPI (5 or 10 µM) for 48 h, followed by labeling with DCFH-DA (5 µM), and alterations in the intracellular ROS generation were measured by FACS analysis. Vertical line, no treatment; solid line, DPI treatment (10 µM). (B) Data are expressed relative to the mean fluorescence intensity (% ROS generation) of the untreated cells, which was arbitrarily defined as 100% (n=3). (C) Effect of DPI on apoptosis. HSC-2 and HSC-3 cells were treated with either 10 or 20 µM of DPI for 48 h, respectively. After the incubation for 48 h, the cells were stained with AxV-FITC and PI. The percentages of AxV+/PI+ cells are indicated. Bar graphs showing the percentage of apoptosis (AxV+/PI+ cells) are presented. Data are expressed as the mean ± SE (n=3). *P<0.05, significant difference.

Knockdown of Nox1, but not Nox4, suppresses cell survival

Since Nox1 and Nox4 mRNA expression was readily detectable in the HSC-2 and HSC-3 cells, we next examined the effect of Nox1 or Nox4 knockdown on cell viability using MTT assay. We verified that transfection of Nox1 or Nox4 siRNAs significantly reduced their endogenous mRNA levels (65–70% in Nox1 or 50–55% in Nox4), respectively, in the cells compared to those transfected with control siRNA (Fig. 4A and B). Knockdown of Nox1, but not Nox4, significantly suppressed the cell viability in both the HSC-2 and HSC-3 cell lines (Fig. 4C). In addition, the percentages of AxV+/PI+ cells were significantly increased after the transfection of Nox1 siRNAs (Fig. 4D), strongly suggesting that Nox1 contributes to anti-apoptosis in OSCC cells. Unexpectedly, under Nox1 knockdown, no significant reduction in intracellular ROS was detected (Fig. 4E), suggesting that Nox1 may contribute to cell survival through a mechanism other than ROS generation.

Figure 4

Cell survival and apoptosis under Nox1 or Nox4 knockdown. (A and B) HSC-2 and HSC-3 cells (1×105 cell/well) were transfected with 50 nM of siRNA specific to Nox1, Nox4 or a non-specific control siRNA. After 48 h, total RNA was extracted from the cells and mRNA expression levels of Nox1 (A) or Nox4 (B) were analyzed using qRT-PCR with specific TaqMan probes. The relative gene expression levels are shown after normalization to GAPDH mRNA expression. Data are expressed relative to the mRNA levels found in the cells transfected with control siRNA, which was arbitrarily defined as 100% (n=3). (C) HSC-2 and HSC-3 cells (2.5×103 cells/well) were transfected with 50 nM of siRNA specific to Nox1, Nox4 or a non-specific control siRNA. After 72 h, MTT assay was performed as described in Fig. 1A. Data are expressed as the mean ± SE (n=3). (D) Apoptosis under Nox1 or Nox4 knockdown. HSC-2 and HSC-3 cells were seeded and transfected as described in (A). After 48 h, the cells were stained with AxV-FITC and PI. Data are expressed as the mean ± SE (n=3). *P<0.05; **P<0.005, significant difference. (E) The effect of Nox1 or Nox4 knockdown on intracellular ROS generation. HSC-2 and HSC-3 cells were seeded and transfected as described in (A). After 48 h, the cells were labeled with DCFH-DA (5 µM) and alterations in the intracellular ROS generation were measured by FACS analysis. Representative results of flow cytometic analyses in HSC-2 (left panel) and HSC-3 (right panel) cells are shown. Bar graphs show the percentage of ROS generation relative to the mean fluorescence intensity of the untreated cells, which was arbitrarily defined as 100% (n=3). Vertical line, no staining; gray or black line, control or Nox1 siRNA (50 nM), respectively.

Nox1 knockdown, as well as perifosine treatment, prevents phosphorylation of AKT

AKT (protein kinase B) is a regulator of cell survival in response to growth factors. AKT is activated through its phosphorylation, and this kinase inhibits apoptosis-inducing proteins, thereby promoting cell survival. Thus, we investigated phosphorylated AKT levels in OSCC cell lines using western blot analysis. As shown in Fig. 5A, phosphorylated forms of AKT were readily detected in the HSC-2, HSC-3 and HSC-4 cells (Fig. 5A). We therefore examined the effect of a specific AKT inhibitor perifosine on cell survival using MTT assay. As shown in Fig. 5B, perifosine treatment dose-dependently reduced cell viability in the OSCC cell lines (Fig. 5B), suggesting that AKT plays a pivotal role in OSCC cell survival. Since the Nox family has been shown to enhance phosphorylation of AKT (9), we then examined the effect of Nox1 knockdown on AKT phosphorylation using western blot analysis. As shown in Fig. 5C, Nox1 knockdown significantly reduced the phosphorylation level of AKT. These results suggest that Nox1 contributes to cell survival through activation of the AKT signaling pathway.

Figure 5

Effect of Nox1 knockdown on the phosphorylation level of AKT. (A) Phosphorylation levels of AKT in OSCC cell lines. OSCC cell lines were seeded in a 6-well plate (1×105 cells/well) and incubated for 48 h. A total of 2.5 µg of cell lysate was subjected to western blot analysis to detect AKT or phosphorylated AKT, while 1 µg was subjected to detect β-actin protein. (B) The effect of AKT inhibitor, perifosine, on cell viability in OSCC cell lines. OSCC cell lines were seeded in a 96-well plate (2.5×103 cells/well). On the following day, the cells were treated with the indicated concentrations (50, 20, 10, 5, 2, 1, 0.5 and 0.1 µM) of perifosine for 72 h. The percentage of cell survival of five OSCC cell lines was measured by MTT assay. Data are expressed relative to the mean optic density (550 nm) found in the untreated cells, which was arbitrarily defined as 100%. Data are expressed as the mean ± SE (n=3). The IC50 values of perifosine were determined for each cell line using MTT assay. (C) HSC-2 and HSC-3 cells (1×105 cells/well) were transfected with 50 nM of siRNA specific to Nox1 or control siRNA. After incubation for 48 h, the cells were lysed and the cell lysates were subjected to western blot analysis, as described in (A). *P<0.05, a significant difference (n=3). The data are represented as the mean ± SE of three separate experiments.

Nox1 knockdown and cisplatin treatment act cooperatively to suppress cell survival and induce apoptosis

Cisplatin is one of the most frequently used anticancer drugs for OSCC treatment. Therefore, we sought to examine whether inhibition of AKT activity or Nox1 knockdown influences the cytotoxic effect of cisplatin. As shown in Fig. 6A, the perifosine and cisplatin combination treatment significantly suppressed cell viability in both te HSC-2 and HSC-3 cell lines, compared to the cisplatin monotherapy. Similarly, combined perifosinecisplatin treatment decreased cell viability in the SAS and OSC-19 cells (data not shown). Notably, the Nox1 knockdown and cisplatin combination treatment significantly suppressed cell viability, compared to the cisplatin monotherapy (Fig. 6B). This novel finding prompted us to examine the effect of Nox1 knockdown and cisplatin combination treatment on induction of apoptosis. As expected, the treatment significantly induced apoptosis (Fig. 6C), indicating that Nox1 knockdown enhances the cytotoxic effect of cisplatin in OSCC cells.

Figure 6

Combinatorial effect of cisplatin with either perifosine treatment or Nox1 knockdown on cell viability and apoptosis. (A) HSC-2 and HSC-3 cells were seeded in a 96-well plate (2.5×103 cells/well). On the following day, the cells were treated with cisplatin (HSC-2, 5 µM; HSC-3, 2.5 µM) and/or perifosine (HSC-2, 2 µM; HSC-3, 10 µM) for 72 h. (B and C) HSC-2 and HSC-3 cells were transfected with 50 nM of Nox1 siRNA or control siRNA in the presence or absence of cisplatin (HSC-2, 5 µM; HSC-3, 2.5 µM). (B) After incubation for 72 h, MTT analysis of the growth rate was performed as described in Fig 1A. Data are presented relative to the mean optical density (550 nm) in the untreated cells, which was arbitrarily defined as 100%. Data are expressed as means ± SE (n=3). (C) After incubation for 48 h, the cells were stained with AxV-FITC and PI. Bar graphs showing the percentage of apoptosis (AxV+/PI+ cells) are presented. Data are represented as the mean ± SE (n=3). *P<0.05, significant difference.

Discussion

Nox/Duox family members are regarded as major sources of ROS generation, which plays an important role in cancer development (9,16). It has been reported that inhibition of Nox activity induces apoptosis in a number of cancerous cells including pancreatic cancer, mesothelioma and sarcoma (17–19). In the present study, we demonstrated that knockdown of Nox1 but not Nox4 significantly reduced the cell viability in a subset of OSCC cell lines. We also found that Nox1 knockdown decreased phosphorylated AKT levels accompanied by induction of apoptosis. Our observation that the specific AKT inhibitor perifosine reduced the cell viability suggested that Nox1-mediated AKT phosphorylation contributes to cell survival in OSCC cells.

The Nox/Duox family consists of seven members. Our RT-PCR analysis revealed that Nox1 and Nox4 mRNAs were highly expressed in a significant subset of OSCC cell lines. Knockdown of Nox1, but not Nox4, significantly suppressed the cell viability by 50% in OSCC cells. Additionally, Nox1 knockdown significantly induced the apoptosis of OSCC cells. Notably, Nox1 knockdown markedly enhanced cisplatin-induced apoptosis. This novel finding raises the possibility that Nox1 is a potential therapeutic target for a significant subset of oral cancer cells. We unexpectedly observed that Nox1 knockdown had almost no suppressive effect on ROS generation. It may be possible that Nox1 exerts anti-apoptotic effects through a mechanism other than ROS generation. Puca et al reported that Nox1 inhibits acetylation of p53 (K382), which is a target of SIRT1 deacetylase, and impaired p53 pro-apoptotic transcriptional activity (20). Thus, it may be interesting to investigate the role of p53 in Nox1-mediated anti-apoptotic signaling in OSCC cells.

It was previously reported that Nox4-mediated induction of pro-inflammatory cytokines after epidermal growth factor receptor inhibition (21) and erlotinib-induced cytotoxicity is associated with hydrogen peroxide production thorough Nox4 signaling in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) cells (22). We recently reported that Nox4 knockdown induced apoptosis in mesothelioma (19). However, in the present study, Nox4 knockdown did not induce apoptosis in OSCC cells. Thus, it would also be interesting to pursue the mechanism underlying the discrepancy in the effect of Nox4 knockdown between OSCC and mesothelioma cells.

AKT, a regulator of cell survival, is activated through its phosphorylation and inhibits apoptosis-inducing proteins, thereby preventing cell death and prolonging cell survival. Recent studies have also implicated the use of a selective inhibitor for phosphatidylinositol 3-kinases (PI3K)/AKT as treatment for patients with non-small cell lung cancer, hematologic malignancies and HNSCC (23–25). We observed that Nox1 knockdown attenuated the phosphorylation level of AKT, raising the possibility that inhibition of Nox1 activity may suppress cell survival by inhibiting the AKT signaling pathway. Kozaki et al reported that a missense mutation of PIK3CA, which encodes the 110-kDa catalytic subunit of PI3K, was detected in OSCC cell lines, including HSC-2 and HSC-3, as well as OSCC patients tumors (26). In the present study, Nox1 knockdown significantly attenuated the phosphorylation of AKT and reduced cell viability in the OSCC cells. This suggested that inhibition of Nox1 potentially suppresses activation of AKT, thereby promoting apoptosis in OSCC cells harboring a mutation of the PIK3CA gene.

In conclusion, we demonstrated that Nox1 likely contributes to cell survival through its anti-apoptotic effects in a significant subset of OSCC cells. Based on our experimental data, we hypothesized that Nox1 contributes to cell survival through the AKT signaling pathway without initiating ROS generation. It would be of particular interest to investigate the molecular mechanism by which Nox1 mediates the AKT signaling pathway in OSCC cells. Although we only performed in vitro experiments using a subset of OSCC cell lines in the present study, our novel finding that Nox1 knockdown enhanced cisplatin-induced cytotoxic effects provides an attractive option for the combined therapy of Nox1 knockdown and cisplatin chemotherapy in OSCC treatment. Additional studies such as in vivo experiments and/or Nox1 expression status in patients with OSCC are warranted to further understand the molecular mechanisms underlying the pathogenesis related to cell survival in OSCC and the associated clinical applications.

Abbreviations:

AxV

Annexin V

CDDP

cisplatin

DCFH-DA

2′,7′-dichlorodihydrofluorescein diacetate

DPI

diphenyleneiodonium

HNSCC

head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

NAC

N-acetylcysteine

Nox

NADPH oxidase

OSCC

oral squamous cell carcinoma

PI3K

phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase

PI

propidium iodide

PIK3CA

phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase, catalytic subunit α

PDTC

pyrrolidine dithiocarbamate

ROS

reactive oxygen species

Acknowledgments

The present study was partly supported by a grant from the Strategic Research Foundation Grant-aided Project for Private Universities from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan (MEXT) (S1101027 to S. K., H. K. and Y. H.).

References

1 

Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J and Pisani P: Global cancer statistics, 2002. CA Cancer J Clin. 55:74–108. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

2 

Sklenicka S, Gardiner S, Dierks EJ, Potter BE and Bell RB: Survival analysis and risk factors for recurrence in oral squamous cell carcinoma: Does surgical salvage affect outcome? J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 68:1270–1275. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

3 

Dissanayaka WL, Pitiyage G, Kumarasiri PV, Liyanage RL, Dias KD and Tilakaratne WM: Clinical and histopathologic parameters in survival of oral squamous cell carcinoma. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 113:518–525. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

4 

Chen YK, Huang HC, Lin LM and Lin CC: Primary oral squamous cell carcinoma: An analysis of 703 cases in southern Taiwan. Oral Oncol. 35:173–179. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

5 

Fioretti F, Bosetti C, Tavani A, Franceschi S and La Vecchia C: Risk factors for oral and pharyngeal cancer in never smokers. Oral Oncol. 35:375–378. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar

6 

Altieri A, Bosetti C, Gallus S, Franceschi S, Dal Maso L, Talamini R, Levi F, Negri E, Rodriguez T and La Vecchia C: Wine, beer and spirits and risk of oral and pharyngeal cancer: A case-control study from Italy and Switzerland. Oral Oncol. 40:904–909. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

7 

Kolanjiappan K, Ramachandran CR and Manoharan S: Biochemical changes in tumor tissues of oral cancer patients. Clin Biochem. 36:61–65. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

8 

Kaur J, Politis C and Jacobs R: Salivary 8-hydroxy-2-deoxyguanosine, malondialdehyde, vitamin C, and vitamin E in oral pre-cancer and cancer: diagnostic value and free radical mechanism of action. Clin Oral Investig. 20:315–319. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar

9 

Block K and Gorin Y: Aiding and abetting roles of NOX oxidases in cellular transformation. Nat Rev Cancer. 12:627–637. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

10 

Weyemi U, Redon CE, Parekh PR, Dupuy C and Bonner WM: NADPH oxidases NOXs and DUOXs as putative targets for cancer therapy. Anticancer Agents Med Chem. 13:502–514. 2013.

11 

Sancho P and Fabregat I: NADPH oxidase NOX1 controls autocrine growth of liver tumor cells through up-regulation of the epidermal growth factor receptor pathway. J Biol Chem. 285:24815–24824. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

12 

Momose F, Araida T, Negishi A, Ichijo H, Shioda S and Sasaki S: Variant sublines with different metastatic potentials selected in nude mice from human oral squamous cell carcinomas. J Oral Pathol Med. 18:391–395. 1989. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

13 

Nakaoka T, Ota A, Ono T, Karnan S, Konishi H, Furuhashi A, Ohmura Y, Yamada Y, Nakaoka T, Ota A, Ono T, Karnan S, Konishi H, Furuhashi A, Ohmura Y, Yamada Y, Hosokawa Y and Kazaoka Y: Combined arsenic trioxide-cisplatin treatment enhances apoptosis in oral squamous cell carcinoma cells. Cell Oncol. 37:119–129. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar

14 

Hossain E, Ota A, Karnan S, Damdindorj L, Takahashi M, Konishi Y, Konishi H and Hosokawa Y: Arsenic augments the uptake of oxidized LDL by upregulating the expression of lectin-like oxidized LDL receptor in mouse aortic endothelial cells. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 273:651–658. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

15 

Takahashi M, Ota A, Karnan S, Hossain E, Konishi Y, Damdindorj L, Konishi H, Yokochi T, Nitta M and Hosokawa Y: Arsenic trioxide prevents nitric oxide production in lipopolysac-charide -stimulated RAW 264.7 by inhibiting a TRIF-dependent pathway. Cancer Sci. 104:165–170. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar

16 

Ralph SJ, Rodríguez-Enríquez S, Neuzil J, Saavedra E and Moreno-Sánchez R: The causes of cancer revisited: 'mitochondrial malignancy' and ROS-induced oncogenic transformation - why mitochondria are targets for cancer therapy. Mol Aspects Med. 31:145–170. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

17 

Mochizuki T, Furuta S, Mitsushita J, Shang WH, Ito M, Yokoo Y, Yamaura M, Ishizone S, Nakayama J, Konagai A, et al: Inhibition of NADPH oxidase 4 activates apoptosis via the AKT/apoptosis signal-regulating kinase 1 pathway in pancreatic cancer PANC-1 cells. Oncogene. 25:3699–3707. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

18 

Tanaka M, Miura Y, Numanami H, Karnan S, Ota A, Konishi H, Hosokawa Y and Hanyuda M: Inhibition of NADPH oxidase 4 induces apoptosis in malignant mesothelioma: Role of reactive oxygen species. Oncol Rep. 34:1726–1732. 2015.PubMed/NCBI

19 

Zhang B, Liu Z and Hu X: Inhibiting cancer metastasis via targeting NAPDH oxidase 4. Biochem Pharmacol. 86:253–266. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

20 

Puca R, Nardinocchi L, Starace G, Rechavi G, Sacchi A, Givol D and D'Orazi G: Nox1 is involved in p53 deacetylation and suppression of its transcriptional activity and apoptosis. Free Radic Biol Med. 48:1338–1346. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

21 

Fletcher EV, Love-Homan L, Sobhakumari A, Feddersen CR, Koch AT, Goel A and Simons AL: EGFR inhibition induces proinflammatory cytokines via NOX4 in HNSCC. Mol Cancer Res. 11:1574–1584. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

22 

Orcutt KP, Parsons AD, Sibenaller ZA, Scarbrough PM, Zhu Y, Sobhakumari A, Wilke WW, Kalen AL, Goswami P, Miller FJ Jr, et al: Erlotinib-mediated inhibition of EGFR signaling induces metabolic oxidative stress through NOX4. Cancer Res. 71:3932–3940. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

23 

Fumarola C, Bonelli MA, Petronini PG and Alfieri RR: Targeting PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway in non small cell lung cancer. Biochem Pharmacol. 90:197–207. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

24 

Barrett D, Brown VI, Grupp SA and Teachey DT: Targeting the PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling axis in children with hematologic malignancies. Paediatr Drugs. 14:299–316. 2012.PubMed/NCBI

25 

Simpson DR, Mell LK and Cohen EE: Targeting the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Oral Oncol. 51:291–298. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar

26 

Kozaki K, Imoto I, Pimkhaokham A, Hasegawa S, Tsuda H, Omura K and Inazawa J: PIK3CA mutation is an oncogenic aberration at advanced stages of oral squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer Sci. 97:1351–1358. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Related Articles

  • Abstract
  • View
  • Download
  • Twitter
Copy and paste a formatted citation
Spandidos Publications style
Ito K, Ota A, Ono T, Nakaoka T, Wahiduzzaman M, Karnan S, Konishi H, Furuhashi A, Hayashi T, Yamada Y, Yamada Y, et al: Inhibition of Nox1 induces apoptosis by attenuating the AKT signaling pathway in oral squamous cell carcinoma cell lines. Oncol Rep 36: 2991-2998, 2016.
APA
Ito, K., Ota, A., Ono, T., Nakaoka, T., Wahiduzzaman, M., Karnan, S. ... Kazaoka, Y. (2016). Inhibition of Nox1 induces apoptosis by attenuating the AKT signaling pathway in oral squamous cell carcinoma cell lines. Oncology Reports, 36, 2991-2998. https://doi.org/10.3892/or.2016.5068
MLA
Ito, K., Ota, A., Ono, T., Nakaoka, T., Wahiduzzaman, M., Karnan, S., Konishi, H., Furuhashi, A., Hayashi, T., Yamada, Y., Hosokawa, Y., Kazaoka, Y."Inhibition of Nox1 induces apoptosis by attenuating the AKT signaling pathway in oral squamous cell carcinoma cell lines". Oncology Reports 36.5 (2016): 2991-2998.
Chicago
Ito, K., Ota, A., Ono, T., Nakaoka, T., Wahiduzzaman, M., Karnan, S., Konishi, H., Furuhashi, A., Hayashi, T., Yamada, Y., Hosokawa, Y., Kazaoka, Y."Inhibition of Nox1 induces apoptosis by attenuating the AKT signaling pathway in oral squamous cell carcinoma cell lines". Oncology Reports 36, no. 5 (2016): 2991-2998. https://doi.org/10.3892/or.2016.5068
Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Ito K, Ota A, Ono T, Nakaoka T, Wahiduzzaman M, Karnan S, Konishi H, Furuhashi A, Hayashi T, Yamada Y, Yamada Y, et al: Inhibition of Nox1 induces apoptosis by attenuating the AKT signaling pathway in oral squamous cell carcinoma cell lines. Oncol Rep 36: 2991-2998, 2016.
APA
Ito, K., Ota, A., Ono, T., Nakaoka, T., Wahiduzzaman, M., Karnan, S. ... Kazaoka, Y. (2016). Inhibition of Nox1 induces apoptosis by attenuating the AKT signaling pathway in oral squamous cell carcinoma cell lines. Oncology Reports, 36, 2991-2998. https://doi.org/10.3892/or.2016.5068
MLA
Ito, K., Ota, A., Ono, T., Nakaoka, T., Wahiduzzaman, M., Karnan, S., Konishi, H., Furuhashi, A., Hayashi, T., Yamada, Y., Hosokawa, Y., Kazaoka, Y."Inhibition of Nox1 induces apoptosis by attenuating the AKT signaling pathway in oral squamous cell carcinoma cell lines". Oncology Reports 36.5 (2016): 2991-2998.
Chicago
Ito, K., Ota, A., Ono, T., Nakaoka, T., Wahiduzzaman, M., Karnan, S., Konishi, H., Furuhashi, A., Hayashi, T., Yamada, Y., Hosokawa, Y., Kazaoka, Y."Inhibition of Nox1 induces apoptosis by attenuating the AKT signaling pathway in oral squamous cell carcinoma cell lines". Oncology Reports 36, no. 5 (2016): 2991-2998. https://doi.org/10.3892/or.2016.5068
Follow us
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
About
  • Spandidos Publications
  • Careers
  • Cookie Policy
  • Privacy Policy
How can we help?
  • Help
  • Live Chat
  • Contact
  • Email to our Support Team