AXL and GAS6 co-expression in lung adenocarcinoma as a prognostic classifier

  • Authors:
    • Masahiro Seike
    • Cheol-Hong Kim
    • Fenfei Zou
    • Rintaro Noro
    • Mika Chiba
    • Arimi Ishikawa
    • Shinobu Κunugi
    • Kaoru Kubota
    • Akihiko Gemma
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: April 21, 2017     https://doi.org/10.3892/or.2017.5594
  • Pages: 3261-3269
Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

AXL, a receptor tyrosine kinase implicated in cell survival, proliferation, and migration, is also associated with acquired resistance to epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy. However, its prognostic significance in lung adenocarcinoma (AD) remains unclear. We therefore evaluated the prognostic significance of the expression of AXL and/or its ligand, growth arrest-specific 6 (GAS6), in completely resected lung AD. We evaluated the relationship between AXL, GAS6, and vimentin expression, as determined by immunohistochemistry (IHC) analysis, with overall survival and disease-free survival in 113 patients with stages I-III lung AD. Protein expression was also assayed using western blot analysis in 10 lung AD cell lines. AXL-positive (AXL+), GAS6-positive (GAS6+), or AXL+/GAS6+ staining was significantly associated with vimentin-positive (vimentin+) expression. AXL+/GAS6+ and vimentin+ showed a negative tendency toward an association with EGFR mutation. AXL+, GAS6+, or AXL+/GAS6+ status significantly correlated with poor overall survival. In stage I cases, AXL+/GAS6+ status significantly correlated with poor overall survival and disease-free survival, especially in cases with wild-type EGFR. In multivariate analysis, AXL/GAS6 classifications in stage I as well as in stages I-III lung AD were found to be independent factors for poor patient outcomes. Unlike lung AD cell lines with mutant EGFR, almost all cells with wild-type EGFR showed AXL and vimentin co-expression as determined by western blotting. AXL+ and GAS6+ expression is relevant to a poor prognosis in resected lung AD patients at stage I. AXL/GAS6 might serve as crucial predictive and prognostic biomarkers and targets to identify individuals at high risk of post-operative death.

Introduction

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-associated deaths worldwide, contributing to approximately 1.4 million deaths each year despite major advances in diagnostics and treatment in the last decade (1). Approximately 80% of lung cancers are classified histologically as non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLCs), of which the most common type is adenocarcinoma (AD), accounting for approximately half of all NSCLCs (2). Therapeutic strategies for lung AD patients currently focus on inhibiting target molecules or oncogenic pathways such as receptor tyrosine kinases (35). Unfortunately, despite initial marked responses to tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), most AD patients with oncogenic driver mutations eventually acquire resistance. Therefore, identification of predictive and prognostic biomarkers and precision medicine using the biomarkers could have a clinically significant impact on treatment strategies for lung AD patients.

Signaling by AXL, a receptor tyrosine kinase, induces the downstream activation of phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)/AKT, signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3), mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), and nuclear factor κB (68). Growth arrest-specific 6 (GAS6) is a ligand of AXL and a member of the vitamin K-dependent protein family. AXL overexpression is associated with cell survival, proliferation, invasion, migration, cell-to-cell adhesion, metastasis, and anti-apoptosis in different types of tumors (9,10). In human cancers, increased expression of AXL has been observed in glioma and cancer cells of the breast, stomach and lung, and is associated with invasion and metastasis (1114). Furthermore, recent studies revealed that AXL overexpression led to resistance to EGFR-TKI in NSCLC cells undergoing epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT), making AXL a potential therapeutic target in patients with acquired resistance to EGFR-TKIs (15,16).

In this study, we examined the correlation of AXL and GAS6 expression with clinicopathologic parameters and prognoses in patients with complete lung AD resection. We ultimately found that the combination of AXL and GAS6 expression was useful in distinguishing those with a worse prognosis, particularly among stage I AD patients.

Materials and methods

Patients and tumor samples

We carried out a retrospective study of 113 Japanese patients who had been diagnosed with lung AD and had undergone complete surgical resection at Nippon Medical School Hospital between 2001 and 2009. The patients were enrolled consecutively into the cohort upon undergoing surgery. During a 5-year follow-up, overall survival was measured from the date of lung cancer surgery until the date of death, and disease-free survival (DFS) was measured from the date of surgery until relapse. All tumor samples were freshly collected during surgery, quickly snap-frozen and stored at −80°C. TNM staging, including T factor, N factor and tumor differentiation grade (G), was assessed by the latest TNM staging system and by following the 7th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging Manual (1719). Specimens from lung AD patients were used only for immunohistochemistry (IHC) analysis. The study protocol was approved by an ethics committee review board at Nippon Medical School Hospital. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients and the specimen of the patients was inspected according to the Declaration of Helsinki 2008.

Cell culture

Ten lung AD cell lines were used in the present study: PC-9, HCC827, NCI-H1975, A549, RERF-LC-KJ, RERF-LC-MC, NCI-H441, PC-14, LC-2/ad and ABC-1. Cell lines were grown in RPMI-1640 medium (Gibco, Carlsbad, CA, USA), except ABC-1 and RERF-LCMS, which were grown in minimum essential medium Eagle (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). All media were supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum. The cell line, PC-14, was obtained from Immuno-Biological Laboratories (Gunma, Japan); HCC827, NCI-H441, and NCI-H1975 were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Manassas, VA, USA); A549, LC-2/ad, PC-9, and RERF-LCKJ were obtained from the RIKEN BRC Cell Bank (Ibaraki, Japan); and ABC-1 and RERF-LCMS were obtained from the Japanese Collection of Research Bioresources Collection (JCRB) Cell Bank (Osaka, Japan). Of the three cell lines with activating EGFR mutations, PC-9 and NCI-HCC827 contained EGFR deletions (delE746-A750) at exon 19, and NCI-H1975 showed double mutations: L858R at exon 21 and T790M at exon 20. The other cells all had wild-type EGFR.

Detection of EGFR mutations

The PNA-LNA PCR clamp method was used to identify EGFR mutations in tissue or cytology specimens by LSI Medience Corp. (Tokyo, Japan), as previously described (20).

Immunohistochemistry

Immunohistochemistry (IHC) was consecutively performed on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded sections. After deparaffinization, sections were quenched for endogenous activity with 0.3% hydrogen peroxide plus absolute methanol for 20 min. Thereafter, antigen retrieval was carried out in a 10 mmol/l citrate buffer solution (pH 6.0; LSI Medience Corp.) for 10 min using an autoclave. After blocking with 2% normal swine serum (Vector Laboratories Inc., Burlingame, CA, USA), sections were washed and incubated with goat anti-AXL polyclonal antibody (#AF154, Rot: DMG0514051) and goat anti-GAS6 polyclonal antibody (#AB885, Rot: DNH0113121; R&D Systems Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA), or anti-vimentin antibody (#3932, Rot: 3; Cell Signaling Technology Inc., Danvers, MA, USA) overnight at 4°C. After washing, slides were incubated for 30 min with biotinylated anti-goat antibody for AXL and GAS6, or anti-rabbit antibody for vimentin (1:200 dilution; Vector Laboratories), and treated with an avidin-biotin complex kit (Funakoshi Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). Finally, slides were exposed to 3, 3′-diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride (Muto Pure Chemicals Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan), followed by counterstaining with Mayer's hematoxylin. Negative control slides were prepared by omitting the primary antibody in the above steps.

Evaluation of immunohistochemical expression of AXL, GAS6, and vimentin

IHC scoring was performed using a Histoscore (H-score) as previously described (21), where the staining intensity was graded as follows: 0 (none), 1 (weak), 2 (moderate), and 3 (strong). The percentage of immunoreactive positive tumor cells for AXL and GAS6 were graded as follows: 0, <10% positive cells; 1, 10–25% positive cells; 2, 25–50% positive cells; 3, 50–75% positive cells; and 4, ≥75% positive cells. The percentage of vimentin-positive tumor cells was graded differently as follows: 0, <5% positive cells; 1, 5–30% positive cells; 2, 30–70% positive cells; and 3, ≥70% positive cells (22). The final H-score was obtained by multiplying the intensity grade by the percentage grade. All slides were reviewed and scored independently by two investigators (C.-H. Kim and F. Zou) who were blinded to clinical information pertaining to patients. A tumor was defined as positive for IHC staining if the AXL H-score ≥1.0, GAS6 H-score, ≥3.0 and vimentin H-score ≥1.0; in all other cases, a tumor was defined as negative (Fig. 1).

Western blotting

Western blotting was performed as previously described (23,24). Protein samples (10 µg) were separated by SDS-PAGE, transferred to nitrocellulose membranes and incubated in solutions of primary antibodies: anti-AXL (#AF154, Rot: DMG0514051), anti-GAS6 (#AB885, Rot: DNH0113121), anti-vimentin (#3932, Rot: 3) and β-actin (#A5316, Rot: 123M4876). Anti-β-actin was obtained from Sigma-Aldrich. Anti-goat antibody for AXL and GAS6, anti-rabbit antibody for vimentin or anti-mouse antibody for β-actin were used as secondary antibodies (1:5000 dilution; Vector Laboratories). Proteins were detected with Clarity™ ECL Western Blotting Substrate (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Hercules, CA, USA) and visualized using a chemiluminescence system (GE Healthcare Japan Corp., Tokyo, Japan).

Statistical analysis

Correlations between IHC staining and clinicopathological factors were determined using the chi-square test or the Fisher's exact test. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were drawn for overall survival and DFS and compared by log-rank test. The 5-year survival rate was analyzed by the Wilcoxon rank test. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed using the Cox proportional hazard model. All tests were two-sided, and a P-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics version 21 (IBM SPSS, Inc., Armonk, NY, USA).

Results

AXL and GAS6 expression in lung AD

Among 113 patients with IHC staining for AXL and GAS6 proteins, 43 (38.1%) were positive for AXL (AXL+), 38 (33.6%) were positive for GAS6 (GAS6+), and 20 (17.7%) were positive for both AXL and GAS6 (AXL+/GAS6+; Fig. 1; Table I). Associations between patient clinicopathological parameters and AXL+ or GAS6+ status are shown in Table II. There were no significant associations between AXL+ or GAS6+ and parameters such as age, sex, smoking, T factor, N factor, tumor grade, post-operative recurrence, and EGFR status. The 5-year survival rates for patients who were AXL+ or GAS6+ were significantly lower than those for AXL or GAS6 patients (51% vs. 75%; P=0.028; 53% vs. 72%; P=0.040).

Table I.

Association between AXL and GAS6 expressions and patient characteristics.

Table I.

Association between AXL and GAS6 expressions and patient characteristics.

VariablesN AXL+ AXLP-value GAS6+ GAS6P-value
Total, n=113 43 (38.1)70 (61.9) 38 (33.6)75 (66.4)
Age (years)
  <6541 (36.3)16 (37.2)25 (35.7) 12 (31.6)29 (38.7)
  ≥6572 (63.7)27 (62.8)45 (64.3)0.8726 (68.4)46 (61.3)0.46
Sex
  Male57 (50.4)24 (55.8)33 (47.1) 17 (44.7)40 (53.3)
  Female56 (49.6)19 (44.2)37 (52.9)0.3721 (55.3)35 (46.7)0.39
Smokinga
  Current and former smoker68 (60.7)29 (69.0)39 (55.7) 22 (57.9)46 (62.2)
  Non-smoker44 (39.3)13 (31.0)31 (44.3)0.1616 (42.1)28 (37.8)0.66
T factor
  T134 (30.1)15 (34.9)19 (27.1) 13 (34.2)21 (28.0)
  T2-479 (69.9)28 (66.1)51 (72.9)0.3825 (65.8)54 (72.0)0.50
N factor
  N078 (69.0)27 (62.8)51 (72.9) 25 (65.8)53 (70.7)
  N1-235 (31.0)16 (37.2)19 (27.1)0.2613 (34.2)22 (29.3)0.60
Stage
  I64 (56.6)24 (55.8)40 (57.1) 20 (52.6)44 (58.7)
  II–III49 (43.4)19 (44.2)30 (42.9)0.8918 (47.4)31 (41.3)0.54
Grade
  G134 (30.1)14 (32.6)20 (28.6) 14 (36.8)20 (26.7)
  G2-379 (69.1)29 (67.4)50 (71.4)0.6524 (63.2)55 (73.3)0.27
EGFR
  Wild-type91 (80.5)34 (79.1)57 (81.4) 34 (89.5)57 (76.0)
  Mutant22 (19.5)  9 (20.9)13 (18.6)0.76  4 (10.5)18 (24.0)0.09
Post-operative recurrence
  No60 (53.1)21 (48.8)39 (55.7) 19 (50.0)41 (54.7)
  Yes53 (46.9)22 (51.2)31 (44.3)0.4019 (50.0)34 (45.3)0.64
Vimentin IHCb
  Negative66 (78.6)23 (67.6)43 (86.0) 21 (65.6)45 (86.5)
  Positive18 (21.4)11 (32.4)  7 (14.0)0.04411 (34.4)  7 (13.5)0.023
5-year survival rate, % 51750.028c53720.040c

{ label (or @symbol) needed for fn[@id='tfn1-or-37-06-3261'] } Data are presented as no. (%) unless otherwise noted

a smoking history was available for 112 out of 113 patients

b vimentin immunohistochemistry (IHC) was available for 84 out of 113 patients

c Wilcoxon rank test.

Table II.

Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models of factors associated with death in stages I–III and stage I patients.

Table II.

Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models of factors associated with death in stages I–III and stage I patients.

Univariate analysisMultivariate analysis


CharacteristicsComparison Reference vs. risk groupHR95% CIP-valueHR95% CIP-value
Stages I–III cases (n=113)
  Age (years)<65 vs. ≥650.750.38, 1.490.41
  SexMale vs. female0.900.46, 1.790.77
  SmokingNon vs. smoker0.710.36, 1.410.33
  T factorT1 vs. T2-40.940.46, 1.940.87
  N factorN0 vs. N1-22.941.47, 5.900.0021.570.50, 4.940.44
  p-stageI vs. II–III2.611.30, 5.240.0071.870.61, 5.780.28
  GradeG1 vs. G2+30.920.44, 1.890.81
  EGFRWild-type vs. mutant2.050.99, 4.240.05
  Vimentin IHCNegative vs. positive0.440.13, 1.460.18
  AXL/GAS6 classificationThe othersa vs. AXL+/GAS6+2.561.24, 5.290.0112.451.16, 5.170.018
Stage I cases (n=64)
  Age (years)<65 vs. ≥650.800.28, 2.300.68
  SexMale vs. female1.150.40, 3.280.80
  SmokingNon vs. smoker0.600.21, 1.720.34
  T factorT1 (IA) vs. T2 (IB)0.910.32, 2.620.86
  GradeG1 vs. G2+32.56  0.57, 11.460.22
  EGFRWild-type vs. mutant6.22  2.14, 18.130.0019.303.00, 28.880.0001
  Vimentin IHCNegative vs. positive0.420.09, 1.910.26
  AXL/GAS6 classificationThe othersa vs. AXL+/GAS6+3.89  1.35, 11.240.0125.901.88, 18.530.0024

{ label (or @symbol) needed for fn[@id='tfn5-or-37-06-3261'] } HR, hazard ratio for death; CI, confidence interval; IHC, immunohistochemistry

a AXL+/GAS6 plus AXL/GAS6+ plus AXL/GAS6.

Association between AXL or GAS6 and vimentin expression

The overexpression of AXL and GAS6 is associated with an EMT phenotype (15,16). Therefore, we evaluated vimentin expression as a mesenchymal marker. Of 113 patients, 84 were assessed by IHC assessment for vimentin. Eighteen cases (21.4%) were vimentin positive (vimentin+; Fig. 1; Table I). A vimentin+ status significantly correlated with AXL+, GAS6+, and AXL6+/GAS6+ status (P=0.044, P=0.023 and P=0.004, respectively; Fig. 2A-C). The frequency of vimentin+ increased with the extent of AXL+ or GAS6+, which was highest for the AXL+/GAS6+ group (44.4%), followed by the single-positive group (AXL+/GAS6 plus AXL/GAS6+; 33.3%) and then the AXL/GAS6 group (22.2%; P=0.006, linear-by-linear association; Fig. 2D). With regard to EGFR status, none of the 18 patients who were vimentin+ had a mutant EGFR. On the other hand, 16 (24.2%) of 66 patients who were vimentin showed EGFR mutations (P=0.018; Fig. 2E). Similarly, two (10%) of 20 patients with AXL+/GAS6+ had a mutant EGFR, while 20 (21.5%) of 93 patients in the other groups (AXL+/GAS6 plus AXL/GAS6+ plus AXL/GAS6) showed the presence of EGFR mutations, although the difference was not statistically significant (P=0.354; Fig. 2F). This suggested that high expression levels of AXL and GAS6 were associated with vimentin overexpression and a wild-type EGFR status.

Association between AXL and/or GAS6 expression and clinical outcome

We next evaluated correlations between AXL, GAS6, vimentin expression, and patient prognosis. Overall survival was not significantly different between vimentin+ and vimentin for stages I–III lung AD (P=0.167; data not shown). In contrast, AXL+ or GAS6+ status was significantly associated with poor overall survival compared to AXL or GAS6 among patients with stages I–III lung AD (P=0.027 and P=0.042, respectively; Fig. 3A and B). Furthermore, patients showing AXL+/GAS6+ were also significantly associated with poor overall survival compared to AXL/GAS6 or other groups (AXL+/GAS6 plus AXL/GAS6+ plus AXL/GAS6; P=0.004 and P=0.008, respectively; Fig. 3C and D); however, there was no significant association between AXL+/GAS6+ and AXL+/GAS6 plus AXL/GAS6+ (P=0.094; Fig. 3C). These results suggested that AXL and GAS6 co-expression (AXL+/GAS6+) was associated with a poor prognosis for lung AD. Next, we investigated whether a patient's prognosis was affected by AXL+ or GAS6+ expression among patients stratified according to stage and EGFR status. For stage I cases, overall survival and DFS rates for AXL+/GAS6+ cases were significantly shorter than those for other cases (P=0.007 and P=0.006, respectively; Fig. 3E and F). In stage I patients with wild-type EGFR, the overall survival and DFS rates for AXL+/GAS6+ patients were also significantly shorter than those for the other patients (P=0.0001 and P=0.0004, respectively; Fig. 3G and H). In contrast, AXL+/GAS6+ as a negative prognostic factor was not observed in stage I patients with mutant EGFR (data not shown). Thus, AXL and GAS6 expression in combination significantly correlated with a poor outcome for stage I lung AD and an EGFR wild-type status.

The impact of AXL/GAS6 expression on lung AD patient survival

We finally evaluated whether the prognostic ability of AXL+/GAS6+ was affected by underlying clinicopathological covariates using univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses. Among stages I–III patients, N factor [hazard ratio (HR)=2.94, P=0.002], p-stage (HR=2.61, P=0.007) and AXL/GAS6 classification (HR=2.56, P=0.011) were significant predictors of survival in univariate analysis (Table II). Multivariate analysis, adjusted for N factor, p-stage, and AXL/GAS6 classification, showed that only AXL+/GAS6+ (HR=2.45, P=0.018) was a statistically significant predictor of survival (Table II). In stage I cases, univariate analysis showed that the EGFR mutation status (HR=6.22, P=0.001) and AXL/GAS6 classification (HR=3.89, P=0.012) were significantly associated with death. Finally, the EGFR mutation status (HR=9.30, P=0.0001) and AXL/GAS6 classification (HR=5.90, P=0.0024) were found to be independent predictors of death in multivariate analysis (Table II). Thus, co-expression of AXL and GAS6 significantly correlated with death for stages I–III and I lung AD patients.

AXL, GAS6, and vimentin expression in lung AD cell lines

We also evaluated protein expression levels of AXL, GAS6, and vimentin in 10 lung AD cell lines (Fig. 4). Unfortunately, GAS6 proteins were not detected in cells, probably because this is a secreted protein. Among seven AD cell lines with wild-type EGFR, five cell lines (A549, RERF-LC-KJ, RERF-LC-MS, PC-14, and LC-2/ad) strongly expressed AXL and vimentin protein. Of three mutant EGFR cell lines, PC-9 and H1975 showed strong AXL and vimentin expression, respectively.

Discussion

In this study, we found that the positive expression of AXL and GAS6 in combination could be used as a marker of a poor prognosis in lung AD patients. AXL protein expression has, in the past, correlated with lymph node metastasis and clinical stage (13,25), while high expression levels of AXL and GAS6 have been associated with poor survival in lung AD patients with stage I–III (25). Consistent with these findings, we observed that AXL and GAS6 expression levels significantly correlated with poor survival in lung AD cases. Furthermore, we showed the negative impact that the high expression of both AXL and GAS6 had on the survival of patients with stage I lung AD. Of note, AXL+ expression significantly correlated with vimentin+ expression, as reported in an earlier in vitro study (26). The co-expression of AXL and GAS6 was mostly associated with vimentin positive expression in this study. Thus, rather than the individual expression of either protein, the expression of both in combination may be more closely associated with the biological features of vimentin, suggesting that AXL+/GAS6+ tumor cells may represent abundant vimentin. Vimentin may actually induce AXL expression (27). However, vimentin expression was not a prognostic factor in this study. Besides vimentin, AXL expression could be also regulated by other factors, including TGF-β1 (26). Therefore, AXL and GAS6 co-expression, but not vimentin expression, may be critical for patient survival, as well as in the carcinogenesis of lung AD. Furthermore, high vimentin expression correlated with an EGFR wild-type status. AXL and vimentin-positive expression were also found for most AD cell lines showing wild-type EGFR. Therefore, AXL and GAS6 may play a critical role in tumor progression and patient survival in lung AD patients with wild-type EGFR. As for the significance of AXL/GAS6/vimentin for the EGFR mutant-type, small numbers of stage I–III AD patients as well as AD cells with the EGFR mutation have been analyzed. Further studies are planned to perform using large-scale samples with an EGFR mutation, including stage IV, to evaluate the correlation between AXL/GAS6/vimentin expression and EGFR status as a prognostic factor.

Recently, AXL upregulation and activation by GAS6 has been implicated in the EMT of breast cancer and hepatocellular carcinoma (28,29). Likewise, the expression of both AXL and GAS6 is deemed to be closely related to full-blown EMT in a subset of lung AD. AXL-related EMT resulting in drug resistance has been reported in patients with prior EGFR-TKI therapy, as well as in in vitro studies using NSCLC cell lines (15,16,30). Aberrant AXL signaling and the development of the EMT phenotype were also associated with ALK inhibitor resistance in ALK-driven neuroblastoma cells (31). Our clinical data support the concept that EMT under AXL or GAS6 high expression apparently exists in patients with prior surgical resection for lung AD, which consequently leads to de novo resistance to EGFR-TKI (15,30).

Unfortunately, approximately 20–30% of early stage NSCLC patients undergo a relapse, even after complete surgical treatment (32). Sensitive biomarkers can help identify patients with early-stage or locally advanced NSCLC who have a high risk of relapse and a poor prognosis. High expression levels of excision repair cross-complementation group 1 (ERCC1), ribonucleotide reductase subunit M2 (RRM2), and thymidylate synthase (TS) were suggested as negative prognostic factors for patients with resected NSCLC (33,34). In addition, cyclooxygenase-2 and amplification of the actin-4 (ACTN4) gene were considered markers for a poor prognosis in stage I disease (35,36). However, a conceivable prognostic biomarker for patients with stage I AD has not yet been established. In the present study, we demonstrated that the co-expression of AXL and GAS6 had a greater effect on survival in patients with stage I lung AD, especially in those with wild-type EGFR. AXL has been recognized as a potential therapeutic target for overcoming EGFR-TKI resistance (30). The BATTLE study using AXL inhibitor and EGFR-TKI demonstrated synergistic effects in some patients with wild-type EGFR (15). Our findings suggest that the combination of AXL and GAS6 was significantly associated with poor overall survival and DFS in the AD subgroup of stage I disease with wild-type EGFR. Therefore, AXL and GAS6 may be promising predictive biomarkers of a drug response and crucial therapeutic targets in lung AD with wild-type EGFR. The prognostic significance of the co-expression of AXL and GAS6 needs to be further validated in large-scale studies of AD samples. Further investigation is also needed to determine whether the overexpression of AXL and/or GAS6 modulate different internal signaling pathways, depending on the EGFR status and EMT signature.

Our study demonstrated that the co-expression of AXL and GAS6 in a tumor was a significant independent predictor of a poor outcome in patients with stage I lung AD, as well as stages I–III lung AD. An AXL and GAS6 expression status may be useful for the identification of lung AD patients at high risk of post-operative death and who will benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy.

Acknowledgements

This study was supported in part by a grant-in-aid from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology of Japan (grant no. 25461172 to A.G.), and the Clinical Rebiopy Bank Project for Comprehensive Cancer Therapy Development in Nippon Medical School.

References

1 

Torre LA, Bray F, Siegel RL, Ferlay J, Lortet-Tieulent J and Jemal A: Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin. 65:87–108. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

2 

Alberg AJ, Brock MV, Ford JG, Samet JM and Spivack SD: Epidemiology of lung cancer: Diagnosis and management of lung cancer, 3rd ed: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Chest. 143 Suppl 5:e1–e29. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar

3 

Maemondo M, Inoue A, Kobayashi K, Sugawara S, Oizumi S, Isobe H, Gemma A, Harada M, Yoshizawa H, Kinoshita I, et al: North-East Japan Study Group: Gefitinib or chemotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer with mutated EGFR. N Engl J Med. 362:2380–2388. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

4 

Mitsudomi T, Morita S, Yatabe Y, Negoro S, Okamoto I, Tsurutani J, Seto T, Satouchi M, Tada H, Hirashima T, et al: West Japan Oncology Group: Gefitinib versus cisplatin plus docetaxel in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer harbouring mutations of the epidermal growth factor receptor (WJTOG3405): An open label, randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 11:121–128. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

5 

Shaw AT, Kim DW, Nakagawa K, Seto T, Crinó L, Ahn MJ, De Pas T, Besse B, Solomon BJ, Blackhall F, et al: Crizotinib versus chemotherapy in advanced ALK-positive lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 368:2385–2394. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

6 

Hasanbasic I, Cuerquis J, Varnum B and Blostein MD: Intracellular signaling pathways involved in Gas6-Axl-mediated survival of endothelial cells. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 287:H1207–H1213. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

7 

Lee WP, Wen Y, Varnum B and Hung MC: Akt is required for Axl-Gas6 signaling to protect cells from E1A-mediated apoptosis. Oncogene. 21:329–336. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

8 

Vajkoczy P, Knyazev P, Kunkel A, Capelle HH, Behrndt S, von Tengg-Kobligk H, Kiessling F, Eichelsbacher U, Essig M, Read TA, et al: Dominant-negative inhibition of the Axl receptor tyrosine kinase suppresses brain tumor cell growth and invasion and prolongs survival. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 103:pp. 5799–5804. 2006; View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

9 

Lay JD, Hong CC, Huang JS, Yang YY, Pao CY, Liu CH, Lai YP, Lai GM, Cheng AL, Su IJ, et al: Sulfasalazine suppresses drug resistance and invasiveness of lung adenocarcinoma cells expressing AXL. Cancer Res. 67:3878–3887. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

10 

Linger RM, Keating AK, Earp HS and Graham DK: Taking aim at Mer and Axl receptor tyrosine kinases as novel therapeutic targets in solid tumors. Expert Opin Ther Targets. 14:1073–1090. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

11 

Hutterer M, Knyazev P, Abate A, Reschke M, Maier H, Stefanova N, Knyazeva T, Barbieri V, Reindl M, Muigg A, et al: Axl and growth arrest-specific gene 6 are frequently overexpressed in human gliomas and predict poor prognosis in patients with glioblastoma multiforme. Clin Cancer Res. 14:130–138. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

12 

Meric F, Lee WP, Sahin A, Zhang H, Kung HJ and Hung MC: Expression profile of tyrosine kinases in breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 8:361–367. 2002.PubMed/NCBI

13 

Shieh YS, Lai CY, Kao YR, Shiah SG, Chu YW, Lee HS and Wu CW: Expression of axl in lung adenocarcinoma and correlation with tumor progression. Neoplasia. 7:1058–1064. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

14 

Wu CW, Li AF, Chi CW, Lai CH, Huang CL, Lo SS, Lui WY and Lin WC: Clinical significance of AXL kinase family in gastric cancer. Anticancer Res. 22:1071–1078. 2002.PubMed/NCBI

15 

Byers LA, Diao L, Wang J, Saintigny P, Girard L, Peyton M, Shen L, Fan Y, Giri U, Tumula PK, et al: An epithelial-mesenchymal transition gene signature predicts resistance to EGFR and PI3K inhibitors and identifies Axl as a therapeutic target for overcoming EGFR inhibitor resistance. Clin Cancer Res. 19:279–290. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

16 

Zhang Z, Lee JC, Lin L, Olivas V, Au V, LaFramboise T, Abdel-Rahman M, Wang X, Levine AD, Rho JK, et al: Activation of the AXL kinase causes resistance to EGFR-targeted therapy in lung cancer. Nat Genet. 44:852–860. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

17 

Goldstraw P, Crowley J, Chansky K, Giroux DJ, Groome PA, Rami-Porta R, Postmus PE, Rusch V and Sobin L: International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer International Staging Committee; Participating Institutions: The IASLC Lung Cancer Staging Project: Proposals for the revision of the TNM stage groupings in the forthcoming (seventh) edition of the TNM Classification of malignant tumours. J Thorac Oncol. 2:706–714. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

18 

Travis WD, Brambilla E, Noguchi M, Nicholson AG, Geisinger KR, Yatabe Y, Beer DG, Powell CA, Riely GJ, van Schil PE, et al: International association for the study of lung cancer/american thoracic society/european respiratory society international multidisciplinary classification of lung adenocarcinoma. J Thorac Oncol. 6:244–285. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

19 

Edge S, Byrd DR, Compton CC, Fritz AG, Greene FL and Trotti A: AJCC cancer staging manual. 7th. Springer; New York, NY: 2010

20 

Nagai Y, Miyazawa H, Huqun, Tanaka T, Udagawa K, Kato M, Fukuyama S, Yokote A, Kobayashi K, Kanazawa M, et al: Genetic heterogeneity of the epidermal growth factor receptor in non-small cell lung cancer cell lines revealed by a rapid and sensitive detection system, the peptide nucleic acid-locked nucleic acid PCR clamp. Cancer Res. 65:7276–7282. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

21 

McCarty KS Jr, Miller LS, Cox EB, Konrath J and McCarty KS Sr: Estrogen receptor analyses. Correlation of biochemical and immunohistochemical methods using monoclonal antireceptor antibodies. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 109:716–721. 1985.PubMed/NCBI

22 

Hirano H, Maeda H, Takeuchi Y, Susaki Y, Kobayashi R, Hayashi A, Ose N, Yamaguchi T, Yokota S and Mori M: Lymphatic invasion of micropapillary cancer cells is associated with a poor prognosis of pathological stage IA lung adenocarcinomas. Oncol Lett. 8:1107–1111. 2014.PubMed/NCBI

23 

Shimokawa T, Seike M, Soeno C, Uesaka H, Miyanaga A, Mizutani H, Kitamura K, Minegishi Y, Noro R, Okano T, et al: Enzastaurin has anti-tumour effects in lung cancers with overexpressed JAK pathway molecules. Br J Cancer. 106:867–875. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

24 

Seike M, Goto A, Okano T, Bowman ED, Schetter AJ, Horikawa I, Mathe EA, Jen J, Yang P, Sugimura H, et al: MiR-21 is an EGFR-regulated anti-apoptotic factor in lung cancer in never-smokers. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 106:pp. 12085–12090. 2009; View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

25 

Ishikawa M, Sonobe M, Nakayama E, Kobayashi M, Kikuchi R, Kitamura J, Imamura N and Date H: Higher expression of receptor tyrosine kinase Axl, and differential expression of its ligand, Gas6, predict poor survival in lung adenocarcinoma patients. Ann Surg Oncol. 20 Suppl 3:S467–S476. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

26 

Wilson C, Ye X, Pham T, Lin E, Chan S, McNamara E, Neve RM, Belmont L, Koeppen H, Yauch RL, et al: AXL inhibition sensitizes mesenchymal cancer cells to antimitotic drugs. Cancer Res. 74:5878–5890. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

27 

Vuoriluoto K, Haugen H, Kiviluoto S, Mpindi JP, Nevo J, Gjerdrum C, Tiron C, Lorens JB and Ivaska J: Vimentin regulates EMT induction by Slug and oncogenic H-Ras and migration by governing Axl expression in breast cancer. Oncogene. 30:1436–1448. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

28 

Gjerdrum C, Tiron C, Høiby T, Stefansson I, Haugen H, Sandal T, Collett K, Li S, McCormack E, Gjertsen BT, et al: Axl is an essential epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition-induced regulator of breast cancer metastasis and patient survival. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 107:pp. 1124–1129. 2010; View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

29 

Reichl P, Dengler M, van Zijl F, Huber H, Führlinger G, Reichel C, Sieghart W, Peck-Radosavljevic M, Grubinger M and Mikulits W: Axl activates autocrine transforming growth factor-β signaling in hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology. 61:930–941. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

30 

Wu F, Li J, Jang C, Wang J and Xiong J: The role of Axl in drug resistance and epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition of non-small cell lung carcinoma. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 7:6653–6661. 2014.PubMed/NCBI

31 

Debruyne DN, Bhatnagar N, Sharma B, Luther W, Moore NF, Cheung NK, Gray NS and George RE: ALK inhibitor resistance in ALK-driven neuroblastoma is associated with AXL activation and induction of EMT. Oncogene. 35:3681–3691. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

32 

Asamura H, Goya T, Koshiishi Y, Sohara Y, Eguchi K, Mori M, Nakanishi Y, Tsuchiya R, Shimokata K, Inoue H, et al: Japanese Joint Committee of Lung Cancer Registry: A Japanese Lung Cancer Registry study: Prognosis of 13,010 resected lung cancers. J Thorac Oncol. 3:46–52. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

33 

Grossi F, Dal Bello MG, Salvi S, Puzone R, Pfeffer U, Fontana V, Alama A, Rijavec E, Barletta G, Genova C, et al: Expression of ribonucleotide reductase subunit-2 and thymidylate synthase correlates with poor prognosis in patients with resected stages I–III non-small cell lung cancer. Dis Markers. 2015:3026492015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

34 

Zheng Z, Chen T, Li X, Haura E, Sharma A and Bepler G: DNA synthesis and repair genes RRM1 and ERCC1 in lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 356:800–808. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

35 

Mascaux C, Martin B, Paesmans M, Berghmans T, Dusart M, Haller A, Lothaire P, Meert AP, Lafitte JJ and Sculier JP: Has Cox-2 a prognostic role in non-small-cell lung cancer? A systematic review of the literature with meta-analysis of the survival results. Br J Cancer. 95:139–145. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

36 

Noro R, Honda K, Tsuta K, Ishii G, Maeshima AM, Miura N, Furuta K, Shibata T, Tsuda H, Ochiai A, et al: Distinct outcome of stage I lung adenocarcinoma with ACTN4 cell motility gene amplification. Ann Oncol. 24:2594–2600. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Related Articles

Journal Cover

June-2017
Volume 37 Issue 6

Print ISSN: 1021-335X
Online ISSN:1791-2431

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
APA
Seike, M., Kim, C., Zou, F., Noro, R., Chiba, M., Ishikawa, A. ... Gemma, A. (2017). AXL and GAS6 co-expression in lung adenocarcinoma as a prognostic classifier. Oncology Reports, 37, 3261-3269. https://doi.org/10.3892/or.2017.5594
MLA
Seike, M., Kim, C., Zou, F., Noro, R., Chiba, M., Ishikawa, A., Κunugi, S., Kubota, K., Gemma, A."AXL and GAS6 co-expression in lung adenocarcinoma as a prognostic classifier". Oncology Reports 37.6 (2017): 3261-3269.
Chicago
Seike, M., Kim, C., Zou, F., Noro, R., Chiba, M., Ishikawa, A., Κunugi, S., Kubota, K., Gemma, A."AXL and GAS6 co-expression in lung adenocarcinoma as a prognostic classifier". Oncology Reports 37, no. 6 (2017): 3261-3269. https://doi.org/10.3892/or.2017.5594