Regulation of UHRF1 by microRNA-378 modulates medulloblastoma cell proliferation and apoptosis

  • Authors:
    • Zhen-Yu Zhang
    • Bin Zhu
    • Xin-Wei Zhao
    • Yun-Bo Zhan
    • Jian-Ji Bao
    • Jin-Qiao Zhou
    • Feng-Jiang Zhang
    • Bin Yu
    • Jun Liu
    • Yan-Min Wang
    • Ya-Hui Bai
    • Jin Hong
    • Xian-Zhi Liu
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: September 4, 2017     https://doi.org/10.3892/or.2017.5939
  • Pages: 3078-3084
Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

A previous study revealed that ubiquitin-like with PHD and RING finger domains 1 (UHRF1) promoted cell proliferation and was a potential biomarker in medulloblastoma (MB). In the present study, we reported that miR-378 inhibited the expression of UHRF1 to affect the proliferation of MB through competitive binding to the same region of its 3'-UTR. We found that the expression of miR-378 was significantly downregulated in MB tissues and inversely correlated with the expression of UHRF1. Western blot analysis revealed that overexpression of miR-378 led to the suppression of UHRF1. Moreover, a dual-luciferase assay demonstrated that miR-378 negatively regulated the activity of target gene UHRF1 by binding to its 3'-UTR. An in vitro assay revealed that overexpression of miR-378 suppressed MB cell proliferation and promoted cell apoptosis. Ectopic expression of UHRF1 rescued miR-378-suppressed cell proliferation and miR-378-promoted cell apoptosis. Collectively, the present study demonstrated that miR-378 could inhibit the proliferation of MB by downregulation of UHRF1 and act as a potential therapeutic target against MB.

Introduction

Medulloblastoma (MB) accounts for approximately one-fifth of all pediatric brain tumors and is one of the most common malignant brain tumors in children (13). Due to the progress in radiation therapy and chemotherapy during the past decades, the survival of MB patients has considerably improved (4,5). Nevertheless, in WHO grade IV central nervous system tumors, the prognosis of MB remains dismal due to rapid recurrence or metastasis in a considerable proportion of the tumors (6). Therefore, it is necessary to gain more insights in the carcinogenesis of MB and explore molecular targets potentially useful for treating the disease.

Ubiquitin-like with PHD and RING finger domains 1 (UHRF1) is comprised of an N-terminal ubiquitylation-like domain, a plant homeodomain (PHD) domain, a RING finger, and a SET- and RING-associated (SRA) domain, which plays a major role in DNA methylation and cell proliferation (7,8). The SRA domain of UHRF1 recognizes hemi-methylated DNA, recruits DNA methyltransferase 1 (DNMT1) and maintains DNA-methylation patterns (9). In the past few years, UHRF1 was revealed to be aberrantly upregulated and functioned as an oncogene in various types of cancers, including laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (10), non-small cell lung (11), breast (12) and gastric cancer (13), hepatocellular carcinoma (14), and colorectal (15), bladder (16) and prostate cancer (17). Most recently, we demonstrated that UHRF1 was overexpressed in MB tissues and was an independent prognostic factor. We further revealed that UHRF1 promoted the proliferation and progression of MB cells, indicating that UHRF1 could be a potential therapeutic target for MB (18).

MicroRNAs (miRNAs), a class of ~19–25 nt non-coding RNAs, are evolutionarily conserved, and serve as endogenous regulators of gene expression. They also play a vital role in carcinogenesis. miRNAs could cause either mRNA degradation or inhibition of protein translation via direct interaction with the 3′-UTR of target mRNA (19,20). A growing body of compelling data has revealed that the malfunction of certain miRNAs is involved in a series of tumorigenic processes including cell proliferation, apoptosis, metastasis and angiogenesis (21). Recent studies revealed that dysregulation of miR-378 was shown related to tumorigenesis and cancer progression. Notably, miR-378 was reported as an onco-miR in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (22), but as a tumor suppressor microRNA in colorectal (23) and prostate cancer (24), and glioma (25). Nevertheless, to the best of our knowledge, the molecular mechanism of miR-378 in the regulation of MB is unknown.

Playing a vital part in connection to DNA methylation, UHRF1 was implicated in MB carcinogenesis in our previous study (18). However, little is known about the factors that modulated UHRF1 expression. In the present study, we found that miR-378 was downregulated in MB specimens and was inversely associated with UHRF1 expression. We further predicted and confirmed that miR-378 modulated the expression of UHRF1, and exerted a tumor-suppressive function in MB proliferation.

Materials and methods

Patients, tissue specimens

Fresh frozen tissues of 19 patients with MB and 9 cases of normal cerebellum (collected in brain trauma surgery) were gathered at The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University between January 2015 and September 2016. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study and all procedures performed involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the Institutional Research Committee of The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University.

Cell culture and transfection

DAOY and HEK 293T cell lines were purchased from American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Manassas, VA, USA). ONS-76 cell line was obtained from Japanese Collection of Research Bioresources Cell Bank (JCRB Cell Bank, Osaka, Japan). ONS-76 cells were cultured in RPMI-1640 medium (Thermo Scientific HyClone, Beijing, China) and DAOY cells were maintained in MEM-α medium (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA). The transfection was performed using Lipofectamine 2000 reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer's instructions. miR-378 was cloned into the CMV-miRNA-PGK-puromycin vector (Genomeditech, Shanghai, China). UHRF1 cDNA was cloned into pLVX-Neo-IRES-ZsGreen1 (Genomeditech). Puromycin was used to establish the miR-378 stably transfected cell lines. Fluorescence was detected for selection of clones with stable UHRF1 expression. Stably transfected clones were validated by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) and immunoblotting. Transfected cells were then used for Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8) and clonogenic assays, and flow cytometry.

Real-time quantitative PCR

Small RNAs were isolated from tissue samples with the mirVana miRNA Isolation kit (Ambion, Austin, TX, USA) following the manufacturer's instructions. The total RNA of the fresh tissues, ONS-76 and DAOY cells was extracted using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen) and reversely transcribed with RT Primer Mix and PrimeScript RT Enzyme Mix 1 (Takara, Shiga, Japan). The mRNA level was quantified with SYBR Premix Ex Taq (Takara). Human-U6 RNA was chosen as an endogenous control. The PCR reaction was conducted with a real-time PCR system (Roche Diagnostics, Penzberg, Germany). Conditions for amplification were 94°C for 2 min followed by 40 cycles of 94°C for 25 sec, 61°C for 31 sec. The fold change was calculated using the 2−ΔΔCt method. The levels of miR-378 in normal brain tissues were normalized to an arbitrary value of 1. The primers used are listed in Table I.

Table I.

Primers used in quantitative real-time PCR.

Table I.

Primers used in quantitative real-time PCR.

Primer nameSequence (5′-3′)
Pre-miR-378F CGACGCGTCGGGCTGCGAGGAGTGAGCG
R CCATCGATGGGAGTTCAAATGGCTTGCTCC
U6F TGCGGGTGCTCGCTTCGGCAGC
R CCAGTGCAGGGTCCGAGGT
UHRF1F CCACATCGTCCTCACAGC
R GGTCCACATCATCCTCATAGC
GAPDHF TGATGACATCAAGAAGGTGGTGAAG
R TCCTTGGAGGCCATGTGGGCCAT

[i] F, forward; R, reverse; UHRF1, ubiquitin-like with PHD and RING finger domains 1; GAPDH, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase.

Western blot analysis

Total protein was extracted from fresh tissues, ONS-76 and DAOY cells using cell lysates. Gene expression was normalized with glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH). Fifty micrograms of samples were first electrophoresed on a 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gels, transferred to nitrocellulose filter membranes, and incubated in blocking solution consisting of 5% non-fat milk in Tris-buffered saline with Tween-20 (TBST) at room temperature for 1 h. Subsequently, the membranes were immunoblotted with UHRF1 (1:250 dilution; BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA), cleaved PARP (1:1,000 dilution), cleaved caspase-3 (1:1,000 dilution) and GAPDH antibodies (1:5,000 dilution) [all from Cell Signaling Technology (CST) Beverly, MA, USA], overnight at 4°C. Subsequently, the membranes were washed and incubated with appropriate HRP-conjugated secondary IgG antibodies (Dako, Glostrup, Denmark). The protein bands were visualized using ECL Western Blotting Substrate (Pierce; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA).

Target prediction and dual-luciferase reporter assay

Three miRNA target prediction algorithms were used (miRWalk 2.0, TargetScan and microrna.org). For the dual-luciferase report assay, the wild-type (WT) reporter construct pmirGLO/UHRF1-3′-UTR and the mutant (MUT) reporter construct pmirGLO/UHRF1-3′-UTR MUT were cloned. The site of perfect complementarity to miR-378 was mutated using site-directed mutagenesis PCR. Subsequently, 293 cells were co-transfected with miR-378 in a 48-well plate followed by the pmirGLO/UHRF1-3′-UTR reporter vector or the pmirGLO/UHRF1-3′-UTR MUT vector. Firefly luciferase activity for each sample was normalized to Renilla luciferase activity and was assessed at 48 h after transfection.

CCK-8 assay

Cell viability was assessed using a CCK-8 assay. Stably transfected ONS-76 and DAOY cells were seeded at a density of 103 cells/well into 96-well culture plates and incubated for 24, 48, 72 and 96 h. For the CCK-8 assay, the cells were further incubated with 10 µl CCK-8 (Sigma, Santa Clara, CA, USA) for 4 h. The absorbance was assessed at 450 nm.

Clonogenic assay

A flat plate clone formation assay was used to investigate cell clonogenic ability. Cells in the logarithmic growth phase were digested into a single-cell suspension using a trypsin-EDTA solution, and 2 ml of cell suspension was then seeded onto a 6-well cell culture plate at a density of 1,000 cells/ml. The cells were cultured at 37°C in a well-humidified 95% air/5% CO2 incubator for 2 weeks, and the colony formation was photographed and counted.

Flow cytometry for cell apoptosis

The apoptotic ratios of cells were determined using the Annexin V/7-ADD apoptosis detection kit (Roche, Basel, Switzerland). Forty-eight hours after transfection, the cells were harvested and washed twice with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) buffer, suspended with binding buffer, incubated with Annexin V-R-PE for 20 min in a dark ice bath, and then with 7-AAD before analysis on a BD FACSCalibur (BD Biosciences).

Statistical analysis

All in vitro experiments were repeated at least 3 times. The numerical data were documented as the mean ± standard deviation (SD). The Student's t-test or one-way analyses of variance were employed to compare the differences in numerical variables between different groups. Statistical significance was defined as a P-value <0.05. Data statistics were performed using software GraphPad Prism 5 (GraphPad Software, Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA) and IBM SPSS Statistics 19 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA).

Results

miR-378 is downregulated in MB tissues and inversely correlated with UHRF1

To evaluate the expression of miR-378 in MB, we first quantitatively detected the levels of reverse transcription-PCR in 19 MB and 9 normal cerebellum tissues. The results demonstrated that miR-378 was considerably decreased in MB compared with normal cerebellum (Fig. 1A). Meanwhile, the expression of UHRF1 was revealed to be significantly upregulated in MB tissues compared with normal cerebellum tissues (Fig. 1B). In combination with the two data, an inverse correlation between the mRNA levels of miR-378 and UHRF1 in MB tissues was observed (Fig. 1C).

miR-378 is a potent miRNA regulator of UHRF1 expression

Three miRNA target prediction algorithms including miRWalk 2.0, Targetscan and microrna.org were used to search for potential miRNA binding sites with the 3′-UTR region of UHRF1. Due to the higher prediction score (data not shown), we chose miR-378 for further study. As shown in Fig. 2A-C, the 3′-UTR of UHRF1 mRNA contained a putative binding site for miR-378. We then cloned the human UHRF1 3′-UTR sequence and inserted it into a luciferase reporter plasmid and co-transfected it with miR-378 into 293 cells. The luciferase reporter assays demonstrated that miR-378 markedly inhibited the activity of firefly luciferase that contained the WT but not the MUT 3′-UTR of UHRF1 (Fig. 2D-F). Moreover, we further investigated whether miR-378 could modulate the endogenous expression of UHRF1 in MB cells. After transfection of mature miR-378 by ectopic plasmids in MB cells, the expression levels of miR-378 were substantially increased, ~14-fold in ONS-76 cells and 9-fold in DAOY cells, respectively, compared to the miR-NC control (Fig. 2G). Consistently with previous luciferase reporter assays, overexpression of miR-378 significantly inhibited UHRF1 expression in ONS-76 and DAOY cells (Fig. 2H and I). These data indicated that miR-378 negatively regulated the expression of UHRF1 by directly binding to its 3′-UTR.

Overexpression of miR-378 suppresses the proliferation of MB cells and restoration of UHRF1 counteracts the effect of miR-378 in part

To better understand how miR-378 influences the proliferation ability of MB cells, CCK-8 and colony formation assays were conducted in ONS-76 and DAOY cells. In the meantime, to confirm whether the effect of miR-378 on MB cells is mediated by its regulatory role on UHRF1 expression, a rescue assay was performed. Forced overexpression of miR-378 resulted in a marked decrease in the expression of UHRF1, and this decrease was rescued by transfection of UHRF1 (Fig. 3A and E). A CCK-8 assay revealed that upregulation of miR-378 substantially suppressed the viability of ONS-76 and DAOY cells, and ectopic expression of UHRF1 partly rescued the inhibition of viability (ONS-76 MB cells, Fig. 3B; DAOY MB cells, Fig. 3F). Additionally, the plate colony formation assay revealed that the colony formation ability was markedly decreased in miR-378 overexpressed MB cells, and restoration of UHRF1 partly increased the formation ability (ONS-76 MB cells, Fig. 3C and D; DAOY MB cells, Fig. 3G and H).

Overexpression of miR-378 promotes apoptosis and restoration of UHRF1 counteracts the effect of miR-378 in part

Fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) analysis was used to investigate the effects of miR-378 on MB cell apoptosis. The results demonstrated that enforced expression of miR-378 led to significant cancer cell apoptosis. The percentage of total apoptotic cells was markedly increased in response to miR-378 upregulation compared with the control group in ONS-76 and DAOY cells. Moreover, ectopic overexpression of UHRF1 reversed this tendency (Fig. 4A). We subsequently investigated the expression of two putative apoptosis-related proteins PARP and activated caspase-3 in ONS-76 and DAOY cells. Western blotting revealed that upregulation of miR-378 markedly increased the expression of cleaved PARP and cleaved caspase-3 in ONS-76 and DAOY cells, and ectopic expression of UHRF1 partly inhibited the expression of the two apoptosis-related proteins (Fig. 4B).

Discussion

As a putative oncogene, UHRF1 has been demonstrated to be involved in the process of cancer cell proliferation, invasion and apoptosis. UHRF1 has also been revealed to be upregulated in various types of cancer, and its expression was associated with poor clinical outcomes (917). In our previous study (18), UHRF1 expression was not detected in normal cerebellum tissues but was detected in the majority of MB tissues. In univariate and multivariate survival analysis, the expression level of UHRF1 was identified as an independent prognostic factor influencing overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) of MB patients. Furthermore, downregulation of UHRF1 by RNAi inhibited the proliferation and clonogenic ability of MB cell lines with cell cycle arrest at the G1/G2 phase. These data for the first time revealed the important roles of UHRF1 in MB tumorigenesis and progression and suggested that UHRF1 may be a potential therapeutic target for MB.

Recently, studies have implicated miRNAs as important modulators in MB cell proliferation and migration. For instance, miR-218 functions as a tumor suppressor by inhibiting several phenotype-associated genes in MB (26). miR-124, miR-219 and miR-383 were reported to suppress cell proliferation, migration and invasion of MB cells (2729). miR-378 was reported to function as a tumor suppressor microRNA in several types of cancer including glioma (2325). Nonetheless, whether and how miR-378 plays a role in MB development and progression remains unexplored.

Based on our previous study, we used various miRNA target prediction algorithms and predicted miR-378 as one of the most possible miRNAs that interact with the 3′-UTR of UHRF1. Several previous studies had revealed that the expression of miRNA-378 was decreased in certain tumors (30,31). It has been reported that miR-378 was significantly downregulated in colorectal cancer tissues and forced expression of miR-378 inhibited tumor cell viability and invasion (30). Fei and Wu demonstrated that the expression of miR-378 was decreased in gastric cancer tissues and cell lines, and delivery of miR-378 could hinder cell proliferation and induce cell apoptosis (31). In the present study, we used a luciferase reporter assay to validate the interaction between miRNA-378 and UHRF1, and the results revealed that miR-378 negatively regulated the expression of UHRF1. Subsequent transfection of miR-378 in MB cell lines resulted in the inhibition of proliferation, colony formation ability and promotion of cell apoptosis. A restoration assay demonstrated that transfection of UHRF1 could partly counteract the effect of miR-378, indicating that miR-378 mediated the biological behavior of MB cells, at least partly via regulation of UHRF1.

Even though the present study first demonstrated that miR-378 negatively regulates UHRF1, it has certain limitations. For instance, due to the limited sample size of MB and normal cerebellum tissues, the association between the expression of miR-378 in tumors and controls was preliminary, and the sample size needs to be increased for more compelling evidence. Additionally, extensive biological and functional characterization of miR-378 and UHRF1 are needed to better clarify the regulation of miR-378 on UHRF1 in MB carcinogenesis and progression in vitro and in vivo.

In conclusion, our findings revealed that UHRF1, a cancer gene in MB demonstrated by our previous study, is in a modulation axis downstream of miR-378. In addition, our results shed light on the roles of miR-378, which negatively regulated UHRF1, in proliferation and apoptosis of MB cells. Although more detailed experimental and clinical investigations to better clarify the mechanism of miR-378 and its effects on MB patients are warranted, the present study shed light on the promotion of a novel targeted therapy for MB treatment.

Acknowledgements

The authors are thankful for the financial support of the Youth Innovation Fund of The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University to Y.-M.W. and to Y.-H.B., the Science and Technology Program of Henan Province to J.-Q.Z. (172102310648), and the Medical Science and Technology Program of Henan Province to J.-Q.Z. (201602058).

References

1 

Gottardo NG, Hansford JR, McGlade JP, Alvaro F, Ashley DM, Bailey S, Baker DL, Bourdeaut F, Cho YJ, Clay M, et al: Medulloblastoma Down Under 2013: A report from the third annual meeting of the International Medulloblastoma Working Group. Acta Neuropathol. 127:189–201. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

2 

Kool M, Korshunov A, Remke M, Jones DT, Schlanstein M, Northcott PA, Cho YJ, Koster J, Schouten-van Meeteren A, van Vuurden D, et al: Molecular subgroups of medulloblastoma: An international meta-analysis of transcriptome, genetic aberrations, and clinical data of WNT, SHH, Group 3, and Group 4 medulloblastomas. Acta Neuropathol. 123:473–484. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

3 

Packer RJ, Cogen P, Vezina G and Rorke LB: Medulloblastoma: Clinical and biologic aspects. Neuro-oncol. 1:232–250. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

4 

Packer RJ, Sutton LN, Goldwein JW, Perilongo G, Bunin G, Ryan J, Cohen BH, D'Angio G, Kramer ED, Zimmerman RA, et al: Improved survival with the use of adjuvant chemotherapy in the treatment of medulloblastoma. J Neurosurg. 74:433–440. 1991. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

5 

del Charco JO, Bolek TW, McCollough WM, Maria BL, Kedar A, Braylan RC, Mickle JP, Buatti JM, Mendenhall NP and Marcus RB Jr: Medulloblastoma: Time-dose relationship based on a 30-year review. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 42:147–154. 1998. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

6 

Northcott PA, Korshunov A, Witt H, Hielscher T, Eberhart CG, Mack S, Bouffet E, Clifford SC, Hawkins CE, French P, et al: Medulloblastoma comprises four distinct molecular variants. J Clin Oncol. 29:1408–1414. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

7 

Bronner C, Achour M, Arima Y, Chataigneau T, Saya H and Schini-Kerth VB: The UHRF family: Oncogenes that are drugable targets for cancer therapy in the near future? Pharmacol Ther. 115:419–434. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

8 

Muto M, Kanari Y, Kubo E, Takabe T, Kurihara T, Fujimori A and Tatsumi K: Targeted disruption of Np95 gene renders murine embryonic stem cells hypersensitive to DNA damaging agents and DNA replication blocks. J Biol Chem. 277:34549–34555. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

9 

Mudbhary R, Hoshida Y, Chernyavskaya Y, Jacob V, Villanueva A, Fiel MI, Chen X, Kojima K, Thung S, Bronson RT, et al: UHRF1 overexpression drives DNA hypomethylation and hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Cell. 25:196–209. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

10 

Pi JT, Lin Y, Quan Q, Chen LL, Jiang LZ, Chi W and Chen HY: Overexpression of UHRF1 is significantly associated with poor prognosis in laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Med Oncol. 30:6132013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

11 

Daskalos A, Oleksiewicz U, Filia A, Nikolaidis G, Xinarianos G, Gosney JR, Malliri A, Field JK and Liloglou T: UHRF1-mediated tumor suppressor gene inactivation in nonsmall cell lung cancer. Cancer. 117:1027–1037. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

12 

Geng Y, Gao Y, Ju H and Yan F: Diagnostic and prognostic value of plasma and tissue ubiquitin-like, containing PHD and RING finger domains 1 in breast cancer patients. Cancer Sci. 104:194–199. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

13 

Zhou L, Zhao X, Han Y, Lu Y, Shang Y, Liu C, Li T, Jin Z, Fan D and Wu K: Regulation of UHRF1 by miR-146a/b modulates gastric cancer invasion and metastasis. FASEB J. 27:4929–4939. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

14 

Liang D, Xue H, Yu Y, Lv F, You W and Zhang B: Elevated expression of UHRF1 predicts unfavorable prognosis for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 8:9416–9421. 2015.PubMed/NCBI

15 

Wang F, Yang YZ, Shi CZ, Zhang P, Moyer MP, Zhang HZ, Zou Y and Qin HL: UHRF1 promotes cell growth and metastasis through repression of p16ink4a in colorectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 19:2753–2762. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

16 

Yang GL, Zhang LH, Bo JJ, Chen HG, Cao M, Liu DM and Huang YR: UHRF1 is associated with tumor recurrence in non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Med Oncol. 29:842–847. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

17 

Jazirehi AR, Arle D and Wenn PB: UHRF1: A master regulator in prostate cancer. Epigenomics. 4:251–252. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

18 

Zhang ZY, Cai JJ, Hong J, Li KK, Ping Z, Wang Y, Ng HK, Yao Y and Mao Y: Clinicopathological analysis of UHRF1 expression in medulloblastoma tissues and its regulation on tumor cell proliferation. Med Oncol. 33:992016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

19 

Bartel DP: MicroRNAs: Genomics, biogenesis, mechanism, and function. Cell. 116:281–297. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

20 

Krol J, Loedige I and Filipowicz W: The widespread regulation of microRNA biogenesis, function and decay. Nat Rev Genet. 11:597–610. 2010.PubMed/NCBI

21 

Sato F, Tsuchiya S, Meltzer SJ and Shimizu K: MicroRNAs and epigenetics. FEBS J. 278:1598–1609. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

22 

Yu BL, Peng XH, Zhao FP, Liu X, Lu J, Wang L, Li G, Chen HH and Li XP: MicroRNA-378 functions as an onco-miR in nasopharyngeal carcinoma by repressing TOB2 expression. Int J Oncol. 44:1215–1222. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

23 

Zhang GJ, Zhou H, Xiao HX, Li Y and Zhou T: MiR-378 is an independent prognostic factor and inhibits cell growth and invasion in colorectal cancer. BMC Cancer. 14:1092014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

24 

Chen QG, Zhou W, Han T, Du SQ, Li ZH, Zhang Z, Shan GY and Kong CZ: MiR-378 suppresses prostate cancer cell growth through downregulation of MAPK1 in vitro and in vivo. Tumour Biol. 37:2095–2103. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

25 

Li B, Wang Y, Li S, He H, Sun F, Wang C, Lu Y, Wang X and Tao B: Decreased expression of miR-378 correlates with tumor invasiveness and poor prognosis of patients with glioma. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 8:7016–7021. 2015.PubMed/NCBI

26 

Venkataraman S, Birks DK, Balakrishnan I, Alimova I, Harris PS, Patel PR, Handler MH, Dubuc A, Taylor MD, Foreman NK, et al: MicroRNA 218 acts as a tumor suppressor by targeting multiple cancer phenotype-associated genes in medulloblastoma. J Biol Chem. 288:1918–1928. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

27 

Li KK, Pang JC, Lau KM, Zhou L, Mao Y, Wang Y, Poon WS and Ng HK: MiR-383 is downregulated in medulloblastoma and targets peroxiredoxin 3 (PRDX3). Brain Pathol. 23:413–425. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

28 

Shi JA, Lu DL, Huang X and Tan W: miR-219 inhibits the proliferation, migration and invasion of medulloblastoma cells by targeting CD164. Int J Mol Med. 34:237–243. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

29 

Silber J, Hashizume R, Felix T, Hariono S, Yu M, Berger MS, Huse JT, VandenBerg SR, James CD, Hodgson JG, et al: Expression of miR-124 inhibits growth of medulloblastoma cells. Neuro Oncol. 15:83–90. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

30 

Zhang GJ, Zhou H, Xiao HX, Li Y and Zhou T: MiR-378 is an independent prognostic factor and inhibits cell growth and invasion in colorectal cancer. BMC Cancer. 14:1092014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

31 

Fei B and Wu H: MiR-378 inhibits progression of human gastric cancer MGC-803 cells by targeting MAPK1 in vitro. Oncol Res. 20:557–564. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Related Articles

Journal Cover

November-2017
Volume 38 Issue 5

Print ISSN: 1021-335X
Online ISSN:1791-2431

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Zhang Z, Zhu B, Zhao X, Zhan Y, Bao J, Zhou J, Zhang F, Yu B, Liu J, Wang Y, Wang Y, et al: Regulation of UHRF1 by microRNA-378 modulates medulloblastoma cell proliferation and apoptosis. Oncol Rep 38: 3078-3084, 2017
APA
Zhang, Z., Zhu, B., Zhao, X., Zhan, Y., Bao, J., Zhou, J. ... Liu, X. (2017). Regulation of UHRF1 by microRNA-378 modulates medulloblastoma cell proliferation and apoptosis. Oncology Reports, 38, 3078-3084. https://doi.org/10.3892/or.2017.5939
MLA
Zhang, Z., Zhu, B., Zhao, X., Zhan, Y., Bao, J., Zhou, J., Zhang, F., Yu, B., Liu, J., Wang, Y., Bai, Y., Hong, J., Liu, X."Regulation of UHRF1 by microRNA-378 modulates medulloblastoma cell proliferation and apoptosis". Oncology Reports 38.5 (2017): 3078-3084.
Chicago
Zhang, Z., Zhu, B., Zhao, X., Zhan, Y., Bao, J., Zhou, J., Zhang, F., Yu, B., Liu, J., Wang, Y., Bai, Y., Hong, J., Liu, X."Regulation of UHRF1 by microRNA-378 modulates medulloblastoma cell proliferation and apoptosis". Oncology Reports 38, no. 5 (2017): 3078-3084. https://doi.org/10.3892/or.2017.5939