Open Access

Combination of phospholipase Cε knockdown with GANT61 sensitizes castration‑resistant prostate cancer cells to enzalutamide by suppressing the androgen receptor signaling pathway

Corrigendum in: /10.3892/or.2022.8426

  • Authors:
    • Wei Sun
    • Luo Li
    • Zhongbo Du
    • Zhen Quan
    • Mengjuan Yuan
    • Honglin Cheng
    • Yingying Gao
    • Chunli Luo
    • Xiaohou Wu
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: March 7, 2019     https://doi.org/10.3892/or.2019.7054
  • Pages: 2689-2702
  • Copyright: © Sun et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License.

Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

Castration‑resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) is a major challenge in the treatment of prostate cancer (PCa). Phospholipase Cε (PLCε), an oncogene, has been found to be involved in the carcinogenesis, tumor proliferation and migration of several types of cancer. The effects, however, of PLCε on CRPC remains unclear. In the present study, the expression of PLCε and glioma‑associated homolog (Gli)‑1/Gli‑2 in benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), PCa and CRPC tissues and cells was investigated, and the correlations between PLCε and Gli‑1/Gli‑2 in CRPC tissues and cell lines were further explored. In addition, the effect of PLCε on cell proliferation and invasion was assessed in CRPC cell lines, and the sensitivity of EN‑R and 22RV1 cells to enzalutamide following the downregulation of PLCε expression was determined using lentivirus‑mediated shPLCε and/or treatment with specific Gli inhibitor GANT61. It was found that the PLCε expression was excessively upregulated in the majority of CRPC tissues, and PLCε positivity was linked to poor progression‑free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with PCa. Furthermore, PLCε knockdown significantly suppressed CRPC cell proliferation and invasion. Of note, it was found that PLCε knockdown increased the sensitivity of CRPC cells to enzalutamide in vitro by suppressing androgen receptor (AR) activities via the non‑canonical Hedgehog/Gli‑2 and p‑STAT3 signaling pathways. PLCε knockdown was shown to increase the sensitivity of CRPC cell xenografts to enzalutamide in vivo. Finally, the combination of PLCε knockdown with GANT61 significantly sensitized CRPC cells to enzalutamide. Collectively, the results of the present study suggest that PLCε is a potential therapeutic target for CRPC.
View Figures
View References

Related Articles

Journal Cover

May-2019
Volume 41 Issue 5

Print ISSN: 1021-335X
Online ISSN:1791-2431

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Sun W, Li L, Du Z, Quan Z, Yuan M, Cheng H, Gao Y, Luo C and Wu X: Combination of phospholipase Cε knockdown with GANT61 sensitizes castration‑resistant prostate cancer cells to enzalutamide by suppressing the androgen receptor signaling pathway Corrigendum in /10.3892/or.2022.8426. Oncol Rep 41: 2689-2702, 2019
APA
Sun, W., Li, L., Du, Z., Quan, Z., Yuan, M., Cheng, H. ... Wu, X. (2019). Combination of phospholipase Cε knockdown with GANT61 sensitizes castration‑resistant prostate cancer cells to enzalutamide by suppressing the androgen receptor signaling pathway Corrigendum in /10.3892/or.2022.8426. Oncology Reports, 41, 2689-2702. https://doi.org/10.3892/or.2019.7054
MLA
Sun, W., Li, L., Du, Z., Quan, Z., Yuan, M., Cheng, H., Gao, Y., Luo, C., Wu, X."Combination of phospholipase Cε knockdown with GANT61 sensitizes castration‑resistant prostate cancer cells to enzalutamide by suppressing the androgen receptor signaling pathway Corrigendum in /10.3892/or.2022.8426". Oncology Reports 41.5 (2019): 2689-2702.
Chicago
Sun, W., Li, L., Du, Z., Quan, Z., Yuan, M., Cheng, H., Gao, Y., Luo, C., Wu, X."Combination of phospholipase Cε knockdown with GANT61 sensitizes castration‑resistant prostate cancer cells to enzalutamide by suppressing the androgen receptor signaling pathway Corrigendum in /10.3892/or.2022.8426". Oncology Reports 41, no. 5 (2019): 2689-2702. https://doi.org/10.3892/or.2019.7054