Open Access

AML‑derived mesenchymal stem cells upregulate CTGF expression through the BMP pathway and induce K562‑ADM fusiform transformation and chemoresistance

  • Authors:
    • Haiying Li
    • Juan Li
    • Juan Cheng
    • Xuan Chen
    • Lanxia Zhou
    • Zhao Li
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: July 16, 2019     https://doi.org/10.3892/or.2019.7237
  • Pages: 1035-1046
  • Copyright: © Li et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License.

Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

Bone marrow‑derived mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), are the basic cellular components that make up the bone marrow microenvironment (BMM). In acute myeloid leukemia (AML), the morphology and function of MSCs changes in accordance with the transformation of the BMM. Moreover, the transformation of MSCs into osteoblasts is determined through the bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) pathway, ultimately leading to an altered expression of the downstream adhesion molecule, connective tissue growth factor (CTGF). In this study, we aimed to explore the interaction of possible pathways in AML‑derived mesenchymal stem cells (AML‑MSCs) co‑cultured with the K562 and K562‑ADM cell lines. AML‑MSCs were co‑cultured with K562/K562‑ADM cells, and the interactions between the cells were verified by morphological detection, peroxidase staining (POX), reverse transcription‑quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT‑qPCR) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). The proliferation of K562/K562‑ADM cells under co‑culture conditions was detected by flow cytometry. The expression levels of BMP4 and CTGF were examined by RT‑qPCR and western blot (WB) analysis. The detection of interleukin (IL)‑6 and IL‑32 was also determined by enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). In the co‑culture system, the K562‑ADM cells underwent fusiform transformation. The occurrence of this transformation was associated with an increased expression of CTGF due to the dysregulation of the BMP pathway. The AML‑MSCs promoted the proliferation of the K562‑ADM cell, but inhibited that of the K562 cells. These findings were confirmed by changes in the expression of the soluble cytokines, IL‑6 and IL‑32. On the whole, the findings of this study demonstrate that AML‑MSCs regulate the expression of CTGF through the BMP pathway. In addition, they affect cytokine production, induce spindle‑shaped transformation, and increase drug resistance in the K562‑ADM cells. Thus, the morphological transformation through the BMP pathway provides us with a novel target with which to circumvent tumor occurrence, development, drug resistance, invasion and metastasis.

Introduction

Hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs) maintain blood production throughout an organism's lifespan through self-renewal and differentiation. In 1978, Schofield proposed that HSPCs in the bone marrow require anatomically defined regions to maintain function. These regions are composed of peripheral cells within a milieu of local extracellular stromal cells, termed the bone marrow microenvironment (BMM) or ‘niche’ (1). There is ample evidence to indicate that the transformation of the BMM acts directly or indirectly on leukemia cells, and can interfere with the development and progression of hematopoietic malignancies (26). However, contrasting reports have indicated that this interference by leukemia cells may even promote the development of leukemia within the BMM (3,7,8). Regardless of the interaction, the role of the BMM is closely related to the occurrence, development, invasion and metastasis of leukemia.

Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), are a key component of the BMM, and are essential for regulating the number of HSPCs, as well as for maintaining normal hematopoietic function (911). Due to their central role, it is conceivable that they may influence the occurrence and development of leukemia. However, whether the effects of MSCs are positive (12) or negative (7,8,13) remains uncertain. Compared with healthy donor-derived MSCs (HD-MSCs), acute myeloid leukemia (AML)-derived MSCs (AML-MSCs) exhibit a distinct pattern of gene expression, cytokine production, immunophenotyped and cytogenetics (14,15), with significant growth defects, insufficient osteogenic differentiation and accelerated cellular senescence (4,16,17). These defects in AML-MSCs are closely related to DNA methylation, transcriptional gene expression (18) and chromosomal aberrations (19). Additionally, compared with HD-MSCs, the significant changes in cytokines, such as interleukin (IL)-6 and IL-32 induced by AML-MSCs has been shown to be associated with chemoresistance (20). Collectively, the BMM constructed by AML-MSCs can be considered distinct from that of HD-MSCs.

Bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) are a member of the transforming growth factor (TGF)-β family, expressed primarily in the bone marrow stroma. They are the only known morphogenetic factors capable of inducing the differentiation of MSCs (2124), and have been shown to play important roles in proliferation, hematopoiesis and the development of leukemia (2527). There is increasing evidence linking BMPs to the transformation of the BMM (26,28,29) and this suggests a potential role of BMPs in leukemia. Along these lines, alterations in the BMP pathway resulting in MSC differentiation and the secretion of growth factors by MSCs has been shown to confer a growth advantage, as well as BMM transformation in AML (8). Moreover, BMP4-induced NANOG expression with increased stem cell-like characteristics has also been demonstrated in AML (30). In summary, BMP has shown to be critical for the self-renewal and differentiation of leukemia stem cells (LSCs) (26,28), and is considered to be a unique factor in the development and progression of leukemia (27).

In 1991, Bradham et al found that connective tissue growth factor (CTGF) was isolated from human endothelial cells, and that it played an important role in cell adhesion, migration, proliferation and chemotaxis (31). CTGF mediates adhesion mainly by bridging extracellular matrix (ECM) components (including fibronectin, perlecan, vitronectin and decorin) to integral cell surface molecules, such as integrins and connexin (32,33). CTGF protein induces the proliferation of MSCs, promotes the adhesion of leukemia cells to MSCs, and leads to the overexpression of genes involved in the cell cycle and ECM synthesis (34). More importantly, CTGF expression in MSCs may even be induced via BMP/Osterix/Runx2-mediated signaling in AML, and may enhance mouse leukemia implantation (8). Correspondingly, in a previous study, in co-culture experiments with HSPCs co-cultured with MSCs in which CTGF was knocked down, Smad 2/3-dependent signaling was found to be activated, resulting in blocked cell cycle progression and inhibited activation of HSPCs (35). BMP-2-induced signaling and osteoblast differentiation has been shown to be negatively regulated by CTGF (36). Therefore, the adhesion effect mediated by CTGF may be closely related to the BMP signaling pathway. Moreover, adhesion provides a protective BMM for leukemia cell survival (3739), further leading to the presence of minimal residual disease, which becomes the source of genetic instability and relapse (4042).

We hypothesized that the transformation of the BMM by AML-MSCs occurs through CTGF-mediated cell adhesion via the BMP pathway, and ultimately contributes to the development of chemoresistance. By performing co-culture experiments with AML-MSCs and either sensitive K562 or chemoresistant K562-ADM cells, in this study, we aimed to elucidate the mechanisms through which this occurs.

Materials and methods

AML patient-derived bone marrow donor samples

The bone marrow of patients with leukemia was provided by the Hematology Department of the First Hospital of Lanzhou University (January, 2015 to Novmber, 2018). All AML patients (aged 7–82 years, male/female ratio, 34/22) met the diagnostic criteria according to the World Health Organization (WHO) and the French-American-British (FAB) co-operative group (43). This study was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee of the First Hospital of Lanzhou University and written informed consent was obtained from patients and/or their legal guardians. The collection and acquisition of MSCs was carried out according to the Declaration of Helsinki (44). HD-MSCs was purchased from Saiye Biotechnology Co. Ltd.

K562 and K562-ADM cells

The human ADM-resistant AML cell line, K562/ADM cells, and the non-resistant cell line, K562 cells, were both obtained from the Central Laboratory of the First Hospital of Lanzhou University (YB-H1580 and YB-H1581; Yu Bo Biotech Co., Ltd.). The K562/ADM and K562 cells were grown in RPMI-1640 medium supplied with 10% fetal bovine serum (ZheJiang Tianhang Biotechnology Co., Ltd.) at 37°C in a humid atmosphere containing 5% carbon dioxide (CO2). The cells were confirmed to have a confluence of 80–90% before being used in the experiments.

Culture of human AML-MSCs

Bone marrow aspirates (2 ml) from patients with AML were added to a 25 cm2 culture flask (Corning, Inc.) containing DMEM/low glucose complete medium. The culture conditions were the same as those described above. After 7–10 days, the cultures were washed with PBS. The primary AML-MSCs were then obtained. The cultured AML-MSCs were cultured in osteogenic induction medium (500 µl vitamin C, 1 ml β-glycerophosphate and 10 µl dexamethasone in 100 ml DMEM) (45), followed by alkaline phosphatase assay and Alizarin Red staining to verify its ability to differentiate into osteoblasts.

For alkaline phosphatase staining, the cells were first fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 10–15 min and then washed with PBS. Subsequently, the alkaline phosphatase incubation solution (BeiJing Solarbio Technology Co., Ltd.) was added in dropwise manner on the cells followed by incubation for 20 min in an incubator (37°C, 5% CO2), and washing with PBS. The cells were counterstained with nuclear solid red staining solution for 5 min, and washed with PBS for microscopic examination (CKX41; Olympus).

For Alizarin Red staining, 0.2% Alizarin Red (BeiJing Solarbio Technology Co., Ltd.) dye solution (0.1 g Alizarin red in 50 ml PBS) was slowly added in a dropwise manner to the surface of the cells, followed by gentle shaking until the dye covered all the cells. The cells were then allowed to stand for 1–2 min, and then washed with PBS for microscopic examination (CKX41; Olympus).

Co-culture of AML-MSCs and K562 or K562-ADM cells

The primary AML-MSCs were sub-cultured by trypsinization, and third-generation cells were selected for testing. When cell growth reached between 80 and 90% confluence, the AML-MSCs were added to 5×105 cells/ml of K562/K562-ADM cells for co-culture (37°C, 5% CO2).

Morphological observations

The analysis of cell proliferation was carried out by MTT (Sigma) assay. The formazan was dissolved in DMSO and the OD value was measured at 490 nm. The cell proliferation curve was plotted based on the OD value. The co-culture of AML-MSCs with either K562 or K562-ADM cells was performed for 24, 48 or 72 h. Morphological observations were performed using an Olympus inverted biological microscope CKX41 (Olympus).

Peroxidase (POX) staining

Following co-culture, non-adherent cells were discarded. The remaining adherent cells were air-dried, and subsequently fixed with solution (3% glutaraldehyde, 60% acetone solution) for 1 min. Benzoyl benzidine 10 mg + 5 M Tris-hydrochloride 40 ml (pH 7.6) with 2% hydrogen peroxide at a 1:1 ratio was then added to fix the cells for 10 min. After rinsing and drying, hematoxylin was used for counterstaining for 20 min and the cells were then washed with water. Finally, 0.5% ammonia was added to reverse blue coloration. Microscopic (CKX41; Olympus) examination was carried out after complete drying.

RT-qPCR

RT-qPCR was performed on adherent spindle cells at the end of the co-culture experiments. Cells were collected for RNA extraction once they entered the exponential growth phase, (approximately 5×107 cells/ml), as previously described (46). The quality and concentration of the RNA/total RNA were determined using a spectrophotometer (GE Nanovue Plus). In total, <1 µg of total RNA was used for reverse transcription. According to the manufacturer's instructions, cDNA was synthesized using the iScript gDNA Clear cDNA Synthesis kit (Bio-Rad). The concentration and qualitiy of all the obtained DNA samples were determined by UV spectroscopy as described above.

BCR-ABL expression was determined using the leukemia-associated fusion gene detection kit (Shanghai Yuanqi Biomedical Technology Co. Ltd.). The amplification conditions were as follows: 42°C, 30 min; 94°C, 5 min; (94°C, 15 sec; 60°C, 60 sec) 40 cycles. The reaction system was 25 µl. The fluorescence signal was collected at the second step of the PCR cycle at 60°C and analyzed by the standard curve method in absolute quantitative detection. The standard reagent was a plasmid provided by the manufacturers that had been quantified and contained fixed copies of the BCR-ABL fusion gene (Yuanqi Biomedical Technology Co., Ltd.). The dilution was carried out with water. A calibration curve of the Ct values of the standard dilution series vs. the concentrations is calculated and used to determine the concentrations of the unknowns, based on their Ct values.

The detection of the BMP4 and CTGF genes was carried out by the relative quantification method. The sequences of the primers used were as follows (Takara): BMP4 forward, 5′-AGATCCACAGCACTGGTCTTGAGTA-3′ and reverse, 5′-TCAGGGATGCTGCTGAGGTTA-3′; CTGF, forward, 5′-CTTGCGAAGCTGACCTGGAA-3′ and reverse, 5′-AGCTCAAACTTGATAGGCTTGGAGA-3′; and β-actin forward, 5′-TGGCACCCAGCACAATGAA-3′ and reverse, 5′-CTAAGTCATAGTCCGCCTAGAAGCA-3′. The cells were fluorescently labeled with iTaq Universal SYBR-Green Supermix (Bio-Rad). HD-MSCs alone served as the control group. The amplification conditions were as follows: 95°C, 5 min; (95°C, 15 sec; 60°C, 60 sec) 40 cycles; 95°C, 5 sec; 65°C, 60 sec; 40°C, 30 sec. The reaction system was 20 µl. Detection was performed using a Roche LightCycler® 480 Fluorescence PCR detector (Roche). The obtained data is the Ct value. The Ct values of the repeat sample wells were averaged and calculated by the 2−ΔΔCq method (the reference gene was β-actin) (47).

Western blot analysis

The cells were lysed with lysis buffer (1% SDS, 10 mm Tris-HCl, pH 7.6, 20 g/ml aprotinin, 20 g/ml leupeptin and 1 mm AEBSF). Protein concentrations were determined using the Bradford method (48). Protein (20 µg) was separated on 12% SDS-PAGE gels and transferred onto PVDF membranes (Merck Millipore). After blocking with 10% skim milk, the membranes were incubated with the primary antibodies (anti-CTGF antibody, 1:1,000, cat. no. ab6992, Abcam; anti-phospho-Smad1/5 antibody, 1:1,000, cat. no. 9516, Cell Signaling Technology) at 4°C overnight. After washing 3 times with triethanolamine buffer solution (Sangon Biotech Co., Ltd.), the membranes were incubated with goat anti-rabbit IgG horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies (cat. no. 31460; Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific) (1:200 dilution in 5% skim milk) at room temperature for 1 h. The signals were examined with the ECL kit (Elabscience Biotechnology Co., Ltd.), using anti-β-actin antibody (1:1,000, cat. no. 4970; Cell Signaling Technology) as an internal control. Protein gray value detection was performed using ImageJ software (National Institutes of Health).

Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH)

The co-cultured cells as described above were placed onto glass slides. The tightly adherent cells were washed with PBS after 24 h. The slides were placed in hypotonic 0.075 M potassium chloride solution at 37°C for 20 min, then placed 3 times in fixative (methanol:glacial acetic acid, 3:1) for 1 min each time. The slides were then placed on a roaster (Tianjin Tianli Aviation Electro-Mechanical Co., Ltd.) at 56°C for 10–20 min, then immersed in 2X SSC buffer (sodium chloride:sodium citrate, 2:1; pH 7.0±0.2) twice for 5 min each time. They were then placed in 0.1 M HCl for 10 min, and again immersed in 2X SSC buffer twice for 2 min each. Pepsin was added dropwise onto the slides followed by incubation at 37°C for 11 min. They were then washed twice in 2X SSC buffer for 5 min each. Finally, the slides were immersed in formaldehyde fixative (1 ml formaldehyde and 0.18 g MgCl2.6H2O in 39 ml PBS) for 10 min, and then sequentially dehydrated through a gradient of ethanol concentrations (70, 85 and 100%) over a period of 3 min at room temperature.

The BCR-ABL fluorescence probe were prepared (Jinpujia Pharmaceutical Technology Co., Ltd.) in a dark room for in situ hybridization (75-80°C, 5 min; 42°C, overnight; In situ hybridization apparatus, IRIS International Inc.).

The slides for in situ hybridization were placed into two different 2X SSC buffers (46°C, water bath for 30 min) shaken for 1–3 sec, rinsed for 15 min, and then rinsed in 0.1% NP-40/2X SSC buffer for 15 min. Finally, the slides were soaked in 70% ethanol for 3 min at room temperature. A total of 15 µl DAPI were added to the slides to stain the cell nuclei after which they were observed under a fluorescence microscope (Olympus) after 10–20 min of incubation at room temperature.

Detection of IL-6 and IL-32 in the supernatant by enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)

Supernatants from co-culture experiments was collected and the detection of human IL-6 and IL-32 levels by ELISA was performed according to manufacturer's protocol (Shanghai JiangLai Biotechnology Co., Ltd.).

Cell cycle detection

Cell suspensions containing approximately 2×105 to 1×106 cells from co-cultures at 24, 48 and 72 h were subjected to cell cycle analysis according to the manufacturer's protocol (Cell Cycle Staining kit, Hangzhou Lianke Biotechnology Co., Ltd.). Detection was performed on a BD FACS Verse flow cytometer (BD Bioscienses).

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism 7.0 software (GraphPad Software). Multigroup comparisons were carried out by ANOVA analysis. The Bonferroni correction was performed as a post hoc test for the data that were subjected to two-way ANOVA analysis. P-values <0.05 were considered top indicate statistically significant differences.

Results

Morphology of AML-MSCs

The AML-MSCs were found to be adherent cells, with a spindle-like shaped and to be irregularly arranged (Fig. 1A). After 14–21 days, the number of adherent cells increased significantly, which grew in parallel or in a spiral-like manner (Fig. 1B). The growth rate and size of the sub-cultured AML-MSCs were also greater than that of the primary cells (Fig. 1C). After 14 days of culture with an osteogenic inducer (dexamethasone, vitamin C, β-sodium glycerophosphate), the cytoplasm of the cells was filled with granules, and calcium deposition was observed between the cells (Fig. 1D), and red nodules were observed following staining with Alizarin Red (Fig. 1E). Alkaline phosphatase staining revealed a large amount of purple-brown sediment in the extracellular matrix (Fig. 1F). Thus, it was found that the AML-MSCs conformed to the standards of the International Society for Cell Therapy (49).

AML-MSCs promote the fusiform transformation of K562-ADM cells

We observed a unique morphologic alteration in the drug-resistant K562-ADM cells that was associated with the enhanced growth advantage. There were two layers of cells in the culture plate. The bottom layer contained AML-MSCs and the upper layer suspended K562 or K562-ADM cells. After 24 h, the K562-ADM cells exhibited a large amount of adhesion, which was accompanied by fusiform transformation. Moreover, the transformed spindle cells were larger in the middle, and the volume was smaller than that of the AML-MSCs. The size of the transformed spindle cells was approximately one-third that of the AML-MSCs, and the transparency of the transformed spindle cells was better. The contents are clearly visible (Fig. 2).

POX staining revealed that the cells were of two origins. The bottom spindle cells were AML-MSCs and were negative for POX, and larger. The upper adherent cells had two forms, the cells were small and both were granulocyte sources, and were positive or strongly positive for POX (Fig. 3).

Absolute quantitative detection by RT-qPCR demonstrated significant differences in the expression levels of BCR-ABL between the controls (AML-MSCs) and the experimental groups (K562 or K562-ADM-derived co-cultured cells) (P<0.001), confirming two different populations of cells (Fig. 4). Compared with the K562 co-culture group, the expression level of BCR-ABL in the K562-ADM co-culture group was significantly increased (P<0.001; Fig. 4). This may be related to the significant increase in adherent and spindle-shaped transformed cells in the K562-ADM co-culture group (the K562 co-culture group had fewer adherent cells and almost no fusiform transformation; Figs. 2 and 3).

The presence of two different cell types was furthermore confirmed by FISH, with AML-MSCs negative for BCR-ABL indicated by arrows (Fig. 5). Due to the polyploid genetic characteristics of the K562 or K562-ADM cell lines, and the fact that there are multiple sets of gene loci fusions, the results shown in Fig. 5 are in accordance with the results presented in the study by Gribble et al (50).

These above-mentioned experimental results confirm the morphological changes of the K562-ADM cells under co-culture conditions with AML-MSCs. Moreover, AML-MSCs induced the transformation of K562-ADM cells from a circular suspension cell to an adherent spindle cell with a positive BCR/ABL expression.

Changes in BMP4 and CTGF gene expression

Compared with the HD-MSCs, the BMP4 levels in the AML-MSCs decreased significantly (P<0.001; Fig. 6A). Moreover, the AML-MSCs co-cultured with the K562-ADM cells exhibited lower BMP4 expression levels compared to those co-cultured with the K562 cells in a time dependent manner. Conversely, the AML-MSCs co-cultured with the K562 cells exhibited a significant increase in BMP4 expression with time (P<0.001; Fig. 6A).

Compared with the HD-MSCs, CTGF expression in the AML-MSCs was upregulated significantly (P<0.001; Fig. 6B), and was found to be increased even further following co-culture with the K562-ADM cells compared with the K562 cells (P<0.001; (Fig. 6B). Both co-cultures exhibited a time dependent increase in CTGF expression (P<0.001; Fig. 6B) and this was consistent with the morphological observations.

Detection of p-Smad 1/5 and CTGF protein expression

The protein expression of CTGF was confirmed to be present in the co-cultured cells compared to the HD-MSCs, and was greater in the AML-MSCs with co-cultured with the AML-MSCs co-cultured with K562-ADM cells (P<0.001; Fig. 7A and D). This was likewise consistent with the morphological observations. Conversely, p-Smad1/5 expression was found to be lower in the K562-ADM co-culture group compared to the K562 co-culture group (P<0.001; Fig. 7B and E).

Changes in the levels of soluble cytokines

The results of ELISA revealed that the IL-6 levels gradually increased over time in the AML-MSC culture group. The IL-6 levels significantly increased after the AML-MSCs were co-cultured with the K562-ADM cells (P<0.001; Fig. 8). However, IL-6 production by the K562 cells co-cultured with the AML-MSCs was lower than that by the AML-MSCs cultured alone (P<0.05; Fig. 8). Although these levels increased slightly with time, they remained low, and were much lower than those in the K562-ADM co-culture group (P<0.001; Fig. 8).

Similarly, the IL-32 levels in the K562-ADM co-culture group were significantly higher compared with the single culture group and the K562 co-culture group (P<0.001; Fig. 9). However, when the co-culture time exceeded 48 h, the IL-32 levels decreased slightly in the K562 co-culture group compared to the AML-MSCs cultured alone (P<0.001; Fig. 9).

Changes in the cell cycle

At 24 h, the AML-MSCs co-cultured with the K562-ADM cells exhibited a decreased percentage in the population of cells in the in G2+S phases compared with the K562-ADM cells cultured alone; however, this percentage gradually increased, with the percentage of cells in the G2+S phase exceeding that of the individual culture group at 72 h (Fig. 10A). The results also revealed the increased proliferation of K562-ADM cells with time spent in co-culture with the AML-MSCs, whereas the opposite trend was observed in the K562-ADM cells cultured alone (P<0.001; Fig. 10C). The cell cycle analysis results of the K562 cells co-cultured with the AML-MSCs were consistent with those of the K562 cells cultured alone, and cell proliferation was inhibited over time (P<0.01; Fig. 10D). Therefore, AML-MSCs exert a promoting effect on the proliferation of K562-ADM cells, but exert an inhibitory effect on the proliferation of K562 cells (P<0.001; Fig. 10E).

Discussion

In our study, we observed a unique morphological alteration in the drug-resistant K562-ADM cells. The results of this study found that a fusiform transformation of the K562-ADM cells occurred following co-culture with AML-MSCs (Figs. 25). Since this change is necessarily accompanied by the adhesion of the two co-cultured cells, we further examined the levels of CTGF and its related pathway, BMP. Combined with the results of cytokine and cell cycle analyses, we found that the AML-MSCs utilize the BMP pathway to induce the upregulation of CTGF expression and cytokine secretion (Figs. 69), ultimately promoting the proliferation of K562-ADM cells (Fig. 10). However, due to the differential expression of BMP4, CTGF and cytokines, these morphological changes were not observed in the non-resistant K562 cells. The AML-MSCs significantly inhibited cell proliferation when co-cultured with the K562 cells (Fig. 10E). This further confirmed the existence of an interaction between the BMM and AML cells.

Recently, there has been widespread debate over the role of MSCs in tumor cells. Some studies have suggested that leukemia-derived MSCs have a normal differentiation, adhesion, expression and survival, and the ability to support hematopoiesis (13,19,5154). Moreover, MSCs may inhibit the progression of leukemia cells (13). This is in stark contrast to the findings of other studies showing that an abnormal differentiation, defective hematopoietic capacity, a reduced expression of adhesion molecules, and increased an apoptosis occur in leukemia-derived MSCs (4,14,5558), within the tumor microenvironment to promote the growth of leukemia cells.

Nevertheless, finding an exact mechanism of tumor resistance remains to be discerned. Mohammadi et al found that AML cells co-cultured with MSCs and osteoblasts became more resistant to drug-induced apoptosis (59). Related studies have also confirmed that MSCs support AML cells survival and bone marrow transplantation, thereby promoting drug resistance (6062). Moreover, the physical contact or adhesion of leukemia cells to cellular components in the BMM has been found to mediate chemoresistance (60), and K562 cells specifically have been shown to exhibit cell adhesion and resistance to apoptosis when exposed to BCR/ABL inhibitors AG957 and STI-571 (63). Furthermore, related factors that cause cell adhesion promote the long-term protection of leukemia stem cells (LSCs) by the BMM, which is an important cause of clonal proliferation and disease recurrence (41,42). In this study, adhesion occurred prior to this morphological transformation. Therefore, we hypothesized that the adhesion of K562-ADM cells mediated by AML-MSCs is the cause of fusiform transformation and drug resistance.

As a key factor in adhesion, CTGF can induce the formation of spherical cell aggregates, causing attached cells to exhibit morphological changes, from spherical to flat or elongated shapes (64). By examining CTGF expression at the gene and protein levels in AML-MSCs, we observed a significant upregulation following co-culture with the K562-ADM cells (Figs. 6 and 7) vs. the non-resistant K562 cells. This was consistent with the fusiform transformation. The continuous overexpression of CTGF negatively regulates the BMP-2-induced signaling pathway and osteoblast differentiation, resulting in decreased protein levels of phosphorylated Smad 1/5/8 (36). The adhesion of MSCs has previously been shown to be primarily mediated through the ERK and BMP signal pathways (65). This is consistent with the results of the decreased BMP4 and Smad1/5 protein levels found in this study (Figs. 6 and 7) and lends further support to the role of CTGF in the BMP pathway in the development of drug resistance.

In this study, we only tested the classical BMP4 protein of the BMP family. Further research is required to assess the role of additional members of the BMP family as regards CTGF expression and the BMP pathway. Future investigations may additionally shed light onto the development and chemoresistance of AML in response to drug targeting the BMP pathway.

Soluble factors involved in stem cell renewal are the primary targets within the BMM, and MSCs may antagonize chemotherapy within this microenvironment by acting on the cytokine network (58,66). As a core player, IL-6 has shown to be capable of driving the initiation, growth and metastasis of tumors (6769). Simultaneously, IL-6 is secreted by MSCs, which activates signal transduction and transcriptional activator 3 (STAT3), further leading to activation of TGF-β signaling, thereby affecting the growth, proliferation and cytoprotection of stem and progenitor cells (70). In combination with BMPs present in serum, IL-6 may additionally function to enhance the self-renewal and affect the pluripotency of embryonic stem cells (71). IL-6 and its downstream signaling molecules are responsible for multidrug resistance (72). Similarly, changes in IL-32 levels can alter the chemical protective effects of cells on cytarabine-induced apoptosis (20). In this study, our co-culture experiments further implicated the role of IL-6 and IL-32 in the development of chemoresistance as mediated by CTGF and the BMP pathway (Figs. 6, 8 and 9), which further indicates that the BMP pathway and CTGF may alter the BMM and participate in tumor resistance.

In conclusion, the findings of this study suggest that the BMM, which is largely composed of MSCs undergo various changes that confer drug resistance. These changes occur at the genetic and transcriptional level involving changes in cytokines, adhesion, and immunity (18,19,52,73,74). Precipitating factors, include those from the environment, radiation and chemotherapy (75), as well as from leukemia cells themselves (8). The extent to which these changes are observed depends on a combination of factors, which cumulatively contributes to a heterogenous leukemic microenvironment and plausibly confer chemoresistance.

The findings of this study suggest that changes in AML-MSCs in the BMM result in the dysregulation of the BMP pathway. This dysregulation further modifies the secretion and expression of CTGF, which induces morphological changes in K562-ADM cells. This shift may be the result of an increased CTGF expression or the conversion of K562-ADM cells to leukemic stem cells. Moreover, IL-6 and IL-32, which are known to promote the proliferation of HSPCs, were elevated in the K562-ADM co-cultured with AML-MSCs. Therefore, this transformation may be key for the recurrence of leukemia, and its inhibition may be essential for eradicating minimal residual disease. Lastly, this study provides further support for the role of cell adhesion in drug resistance, and demonstrated the importance of the BMP pathway in the BMM, providing a novel therapeutic target for the treatment of leukemia and prevention of its recurrence.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This study was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Gansu province (grant no. 18JR3RA342).

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article or are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Authors' contributions

HL was responsible for the design and implementation of the entire study, and also participated in the acquisition, analysis and writing of all the experimental data. JL participated in the experimental design, and put forward important verification methods for the problems found in the experimental process. JC was involved in the collection and provision of the experimental samples, and participated in the application and implementation of experimental ethics certification. XC was involved in cell experiment technical guidance and assistance. LZ was involved in flow cytometry technical guidance and assistance. ZL was responsible for the design and implementation of the entire study, and participated in the revision of the final version of the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee of the First Hospital of Lanzhou University and written informed consent was obtained from patients and/or their legal guardians.

Patient consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

1 

Schofield R: The relationship between the spleen colony-forming cell and the haemopoietic stem cell. Blood Cells. 4:7–25. 1978.PubMed/NCBI

2 

Krause DS and Scadden DT: A hostel for the hostile: The bone marrow niche in hematologic neoplasms. Haematologica. 100:1376–1387. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

3 

Korn C and Méndez-Ferrer S: Myeloid malignancies and the microenvironment. Blood. 129:811–822. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

4 

Geyh S, Rodríguez-Paredes M, Jäger P, Khandanpour C, Cadeddu RP, Gutekunst J, Wilk CM, Fenk R, Zilkens C, Hermsen D, et al: Functional inhibition of mesenchymal stromal cells in acute myeloid leukemia. Leukemia. 30:683–691. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

5 

Medyouf H: The microenvironment in human myeloid malignancies: Emerging concepts and therapeutic implications. Blood. 129:1617–1626. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

6 

Schepers K, Campbell TB and Passegué E: Normal and leukemic stem cell niches: Insights and therapeutic opportunities. Cell Stem Cell. 16:254–267. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

7 

Kumar A, Anand T, Bhattacharyya J, Sharma A and Jaganathan BG: K562 chronic myeloid leukemia cells modify osteogenic differentiation and gene expression of bone marrow stromal cells. J Cell Commun Signal. 12:441–450. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

8 

Battula VL, Le PM, Sun JC, Nguyen K, Yuan B, Zhou X, Sonnylal S, McQueen T, Ruvolo V, Michel KA, et al: AML-induced osteogenic differentiation in mesenchymal stromal cells supports leukemia growth. JCI Insight. 2:900362017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

9 

Méndez-Ferrer S, Michurina TV, Ferraro F, Mazloom AR, Macarthur BD, Lira SA, Scadden DT, Ma'ayan A, Enikolopov GN and Frenette PS: Mesenchymal and haematopoietic stem cells form a unique bone marrow niche. Nature. 466:829–834. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

10 

Frenette PS, Pinho S, Lucas D and Scheiermann C: Mesenchymal stem cell: Keystone of the hematopoietic stem cell niche and a stepping-stone for regenerative medicine. Annu Rev Immunol. 31:285–316. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

11 

Sacchetti B, Funari A, Michienzi S, Di Cesare S, Piersanti S, Saggio I, Tagliafico E, Ferrari S, Robey PG, Riminucci M and Bianco P: Self-renewing osteoprogenitors in bone marrow sinusoids can organize a hematopoietic microenvironment. Cell. 131:324–336. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

12 

Song N, Gao L, Qiu H, Huang C, Cheng H, Zhou H, Lv S, Chen L and Wang J: Mouse bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells inhibit leukemia/lymphoma cell proliferation in vitro and in a mouse model of allogeneic bone marrow transplant. Int J Mol Med. 36:139–149. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

13 

Zhao Z, Tang X, You Y, Li W, Liu F and Zou P: Assessment of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell biological characteristics and support hemotopoiesis function in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia. Leuk Res. 30:993–1003. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

14 

Huang JC, Basu SK, Zhao X, Chien S, Fang M, Oehler VG, Appelbaum FR and Becker PS: Mesenchymal stromal cells derived from acute myeloid leukemia bone marrow exhibit aberrant cytogenetics and cytokine elaboration. Blood Cancer J. 5:e3022015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

15 

Fracchiolla NS, Fattizzo B and Cortelezzi A: Mesenchymal stem cells in myeloid malignancies: A focus on immune escaping and therapeutic implications. Stem Cells Int 2017. 67205942017.

16 

Schroeder T, Geyh S, Germing U and Haas R: Mesenchymal stromal cells in myeloid malignancies. Blood Res. 51:225–232. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

17 

Geyh S, Oz S, Cadeddu RP, Fröbel J, Brückner B, Kündgen A, Fenk R, Bruns I, Zilkens C, Hermsen D, Gattermann N, et al: Insufficient stromal support in MDS results from molecular and functional deficits of mesenchymal stromal cells. Leukemia. 27:1841–1851. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

18 

von der Heide EK, Neumann M, Vosberg S, James AR, Schroeder MP, Ortiz-Tanchez J, Isaakidis K, Schlee C, Luther M, Jöhrens K, et al: Molecular alterations in bone marrow mesenchymal stromal cells derived from acute myeloid leukemia patients. Leukemia. 31:1069–1078. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

19 

Blau O, Hofmann WK, Baldus CD, Thiel G, Serbent V, Schümann E, Thiel E and Blau IW: Chromosomal aberrations in bone marrow mesenchymal stroma cells from patients with myelodysplastic syndrome and acute myeloblastic leukemia. Exp Hematol. 35:221–229. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

20 

Lopes MR, Pereira JK, de Melo Campos P, Machado-Neto JA, Traina F, Saad ST and Favaro P: De novo AML exhibits greater microenvironment dysregulation compared to AML with myelodysplasia-related changes. Sci Rep. 7:407072017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

21 

Wang EA, Rosen V, D'Alessandro JS, Bauduy M, Cordes P, Harada T, Israel DI, Hewick RM, Kerns KM, LaPan P, et al: Recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein induces bone formation. Proc Nati Acad Sci USA. 87:2220–2224. 1990. View Article : Google Scholar

22 

Scarfi S: Use of bone morphogenetic proteins in mesenchymal stem cell stimulation of cartilage and bone repair. World J Stem Cells. 8:1–12. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

23 

He Y, Yu L, Liu J, Li Y, Wu Y, Huang Z, Wu D, Wang H, Wu Z and Qiu G: Enhanced osteogenic differentiation of human bone-derived mesenchymal stem cells in 3-dimensional printed porous titanium scaffolds by static magnetic field through up-regulating Smad4. FASEB J. 33:6069–6081. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

24 

Zhang Y, Chen B, Li D, Zhou X and Chen Z: LncRNA NEAT1/miR-29b-3p/BMP1 axis promotes osteogenic differentiation in human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells. Pathol Res Pract. 215:525–531. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

25 

Vicente López MA, Vázquez García MN, Entrena A, Olmedillas Lopez S, García-Arranz M, García-Olmo D and Zapata A: Low doses of bone morphogenetic protein 4 increase the survival of human adipose-derived stem cells maintaining their stemness and multipotency. Stem Cells Dev. 20:1011–1019. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

26 

Toofan P and Wheadon H: Role of the bone morphogenic protein pathway in developmental haemopoiesis and leukaemogenesis. Biochem Soc Trans. 44:1455–1463. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

27 

Zylbersztejn F, Flores-Violante M, Voeltzel T, Nicolini FE, Lefort S and Maguer-Satta V: The BMP pathway: A unique tool to decode the origin and progression of leukemia. Exp Hematol. 61:36–44. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

28 

Zhao X, Liu J, Peng M, Liu J and Chen F: BMP4 is involved in the chemoresistance of myeloid leukemia cells through regulating autophagy-apoptosis balance. Cancer Invest. 31:555–562. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

29 

Goldman DC, Bailey AS, Pfaffle DL, Al Masri A, Christian JL and Fleming WH: BMP4 regulates the hematopoietic stem cell niche. Blood. 114:4393–4401. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

30 

Voeltzel T, Flores-Violante M, Zylbersztejn F, Lefort S, Billandon M, Jeanpierre S, Joly S, Fossard G, Milenkov M, Mazurier F, et al: A new signaling cascade linking BMP4, BMPR1A, DeltaNp73 and NANOG impacts on stem-like human cell properties and patient outcome. Cell Death Dis. 9:10112018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

31 

Bradham DM, Igarashi A, Potter RL and Grotendorst GR: Connective tissue growth factor: A cysteine-rich mitogen secreted by human vascular endothelial cells is related to the SRC-induced immediate early gene product CEF10. J Cell Biol. 114:1285–1294. 1991. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

32 

Aguiar DP, de Farias GC, de Sousa EB, de Mattos Coelho- Aguiar J, Lobo JC, Casado PL, Duarte ME and Abreu JG Jr: New strategy to control cell migration and metastasis regulated by CCN2/CTGF. Cancer Cell Int. 14:612014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

33 

Jun JI and Lau LF: Taking aim at the extracellular matrix: CCN proteins as emerging therapeutic targets. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 10:945–963. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

34 

Chen CC and Lau LF: Functions and mechanisms of action of CCN matricellular proteins. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 41:771–783. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

35 

Istvánffy R, Vilne B, Schreck C, Ruf F, Pagel C, Grziwok S, Henkel L, Prazeres da Costa O, Berndt J, Stümpflen V, et al: Stroma-derived connective tissue growth factor maintains cell cycle progression and repopulation activity of hematopoietic stem cells in vitro. Stem Cell Rep. 5:702–715. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar

36 

Mundy C, Gannon M and Popoff SN: Connective tissue growth factor (CTGF/CCN2) negatively regulates BMP-2 induced osteoblast differentiation and signaling. J Cell Physiol. 229:672–681. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

37 

Johansen S, Brenner AK, Bartaula-Brevik S, Reikvam H and Bruserud O: The possible importance of β3 integrins for leukemogenesis and chemoresistance in acute myeloid leukemia. Int J Mol Sci. 19:E2512018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

38 

Al-Asadi MG, Brindle G, Castellanos M, May ST, Mills KI, Russell NH, Seedhouse CH and Pallis M: A molecular signature of dormancy in CD34+CD38- acute myeloid leukaemia cells. Oncotarget. 8:111405–111418. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

39 

Wang J, Liu X, Qiu Y, Shi Y, Cai J, Wang B, Wei X, Ke Q, Sui X, Wang Y, et al: Cell adhesion-mediated mitochondria transfer contributes to mesenchymal stem cell-induced chemoresistance on T cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia cells. J Hematol Oncol. 11:112018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

40 

Meads MB, Gatenby RA and Dalton WS: Environment-mediated drug resistance: A major contributor to minimal residual disease. Nat Rev Cancer. 9:665–674. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

41 

Winkler IG, Barbier V, Nowlan B, Jacobsen RN, Forristal CE, Patton JT, Magnani JL and Lévesque JP: Vascular niche E-selectin regulates hematopoietic stem cell dormancy, self renewal and chemoresistance. Nat Med. 18:1651–1657. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

42 

Jacamo R, Chen Y, Wang Z, Ma W, Zhang M, Spaeth EL, Wang Y, Battula VL, Mak PY, Schallmoser K, et al: Reciprocal leukemia-stroma VCAM-1/VLA-4-dependent activation of NF-κB mediates chemoresistance. Blood. 123:2691–2702. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

43 

Arber DA, Orazi A, Hasserjian R, Thiele J, Borowitz MJ, Le Beau MM, Bloomfield CD, Cazzola M and Vardiman JW: The 2016 revision to the World Health Organization classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemia. Blood. 127:2391–2405. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

44 

World Medical Association: World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA. 310:2191–2194. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

45 

Nielsen EØ, Chen L, Hansen JO, Degn M, Overgaard S and Ding M: Optimizing Osteogenic differentiation of ovine adipose-derived stem cells by osteogenic induction medium and FGFb, BMP2, or NELL1 in vitro. Stem Cells Int 2018. 97813932018.

46 

Liu X and Harada S: RNA isolation from mammalian samples. Curr Protoc Mol Biol Chapter. 4:Unit 4.16. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar

47 

Livak KJ and Schmittgen TD: Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) method. Methods. 25:402–408. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

48 

Zor T and Selinger Z: Linearization of the Bradford protein assay increases its sensitivity: Theoretical and experimental studies. Anal Biochem. 236:302–308. 1996. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

49 

Dominici M, Le Blanc K, Mueller I, Slaper-Cortenbach I, Marini F, Krause D, Deans R, Keating A, Prockop Dj and Horwitz E: Minimal criteria for defining multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells. The International Society for cellular therapy position statement. Cytotherapy. 8:315–317. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

50 

Gribble SM, Roberts I, Grace C, Andrews KM, Green AR and Nacheva EP: Cytogenetics of the chronic myeloid leukemia-derived cell line K562: Karyotype clarification by multicolor fluorescence in situ hybridization, comparative genomic hybridization, and locus-specific fluorescence in situ hybridization. Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 118:1–8. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

51 

Kouvidi E, Stratigi A, Batsali A, Mavroudi I, Mastrodemou S, Ximeri M, Papadaki HA and Pontikoglou CG: Cytogenetic evaluation of mesenchymal stem/stromal cells from patients with myelodysplastic syndromes at different time-points during ex vivo expansion. Leuk Res. 43:24–32. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

52 

Blau O, Baldus CD, Hofmann WK, Thiel G, Nolte F, Burmeister T, Türkmen S, Benlasfer O, Schümann E, Sindram A, et al: Mesenchymal stromal cells of myelodysplastic syndrome and acute myeloid leukemia patients have distinct genetic abnormalities compared with leukemic blasts. Blood. 118:5583–5592. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

53 

Soenen-Cornu V, Tourino C, Bonnet ML, Guillier M, Flamant S, Kotb R, Bernheim A, Bourhis JH, Preudhomme C, Fenaux P and Turhan AG: Mesenchymal cells generated from patients with myelodysplastic syndromes are devoid of chromosomal clonal markers and support short- and long-term hematopoiesis in vitro. Oncogene. 24:2441–2448. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

54 

Jootar S, Pornprasertsud N, Petvises S, Rerkamnuaychoke B, Disthabanchong S, Pakakasama S, Ungkanont A and Hongeng S: Bone marrow derived mesenchymal stem cells from chronic myeloid leukemia t(9;22) patients are devoid of Philadelphia chromosome and support cord blood stem cell expansion. Leuk Res. 30:1493–1498. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

55 

Flores-Figueroa E, Montesinos JJ, Flores-Guzmán P, Gutiérrez-Espíndola G, Arana-Trejo RM, Castillo-Medina S, Pérez-Cabrera A, Hernández-Estévez E, Arriaga L and Mayani H: Functional analysis of myelodysplastic syndromes-derived mesenchymal stem cells. Leuk Res. 32:1407–1416. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

56 

Aanei CM, Flandrin P, Eloae FZ, Carasevici E, Guyotat D, Wattel E and Campos L: Intrinsic growth deficiencies of mesenchymal stromal cells in myelodysplastic syndromes. Stem Cells Dev. 21:1604–1615. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

57 

Chandran P, Le Y, Li Y, Sabloff M, Mehic J, Rosu-Myles M and Allan DS: Mesenchymal stromal cells from patients with acute myeloid leukemia have altered capacity to expand differentiated hematopoietic progenitors. Leuk Res. 39:486–493. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

58 

Reikvam H, Brenner AK, Hagen KM, Liseth K, Skrede S, Hatfield KJ and Bruserud Ø: The cytokine-mediated crosstalk between primary human acute myeloid cells and mesenchymal stem cells alters the local cytokine network and the global gene expression profile of the mesenchymal cells. Stem Cell Res. 15:530–541. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

59 

Mohammadi S, Nikbakht M, Sajjadi SM, Rad F, Chahardouli B, Sabour Takanlu J, Rostami Sh, Alimoghaddam K, Ghavamzadeh A and Ghaffari SH: Reciprocal interactions of leukemic cells with bone marrow stromal cells promote enrichment of leukemic stem cell compartments in response to curcumin and daunorubicin. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 18:831–840. 2017.PubMed/NCBI

60 

Becker PS: Dependence of acute myeloid leukemia on adhesion within the bone marrow microenvironment. ScientificWorldJournal 2012. 8564672012.

61 

Konopleva M, Konoplev S, Hu W, Zaritskey AY, Afanasiev BV and Andreeff M: Stromal cells prevent apoptosis of AML cells by up-regulation of anti-apoptotic proteins. Leukemia. 16:1713–1724. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

62 

Nwajei F and Konopleva M: The bone marrow microenvironment as niche retreats for hematopoietic and leukemic stem cells. Adv Hematol 2013. 9539822013.

63 

Damiano JS, Hazlehurst LA and Dalton W: Cell adhesion-mediated drug resistance (CAM-DR) protects the K562 chronic myelogenous leukemia cell line from apoptosis induced by BCR/ABL inhibition, cytotoxic drugs, and gamma-irradiation. Leukemia. 15:1232–1239. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

64 

Aguiar DP, Coelho-Aguiar JM and Abreu JG: CCN2/CTGF silencing blocks cell aggregation in embryonal carcinoma P19 cell. Braz J Med Biol Res. 44:200–205. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

65 

Kumar A, Bhattacharyya J and Jaganathan BG: Adhesion to stromal cells mediates imatinib resistance in chronic myeloid leukemia through ERK and BMP signaling pathways. Sci Rep. 7:95352017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

66 

Kojima K, McQueen T, Chen Y, Jacamo R, Konopleva M, Shinojima N, Shpall E, Huang X and Andreeff M: p53 activation of mesenchymal stromal cells partially abrogates microenvironment-mediated resistance to FLT3 inhibition in AML through HIF-1α-mediated down-regulation of CXCL12. Blood. 118:4431–4439. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

67 

Naugler WE and Karin M: The wolf in sheep's clothing: The role of interleukin-6 in immunity, inflammation and cancer. Trends Mol Med. 14:109–119. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

68 

Rose-John S: IL-6 trans-signaling via the soluble IL-6 receptor: Importance for the pro-inflammatory activities of IL-6. Int J Biol Sci. 8:1237–1247. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

69 

Fisher DT, Chen Q, Skitzki JJ, Muhitch JB, Zhou L, Appenheimer MM, Vardam TD, Weis EL, Passanese J, Wang WC, et al: IL-6 trans-signaling licenses mouse and human tumor microvascular gateways for trafficking of cytotoxic T cells. J Clin Invest. 121:3846–3859. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

70 

Onishi K and Zandstra PW: LIF signaling in stem cells and development. Development. 142:2230–2236. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

71 

Itoh F, Watabe T and Miyazono K: Roles of TGF-β family signals in the fate determination of pluripotent stem cells. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 32:98–106. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

72 

Conze D, Weiss L, Regen PS, Bhushan A, Weaver D, Johnson P and Rincón M: Autocrine production of interleukin 6 causes multidrug resistance in breast cancer cells. Cancer Res. 61:8851–8858. 2001.PubMed/NCBI

73 

Desbourdes L, Javary J, Charbonnier T, Ishac N, Bourgeais J, Iltis A, Chomel JC, Turhan A, Guilloton F, Tarte K, et al: Alteration analysis of bone marrow mesenchymal stromal cells from de novo acute myeloid leukemia patients at diagnosis. Stem Cells Dev. 26:709–722. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

74 

Pontikoglou C, Kastrinaki MC, Klaus M, Kalpadakis C, Katonis P, Alpantaki K, Pangalis GA and Papadaki HA: Study of the quantitative, functional, cytogenetic, and immunoregulatory properties of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells in patients with B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Stem Cells Dev. 22:1329–1341. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

75 

Ogden A, Rida PC, Knudsen BS, Kucuk O and Aneja R: Docetaxel-induced polyploidization may underlie chemoresistance and disease relapse. Cancer Lett. 367:89–92. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Related Articles

Journal Cover

September 2019
Volume 42 Issue 3

Print ISSN: 1021-335X
Online ISSN:1791-2431

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
APA
Li, H., Li, J., Cheng, J., Chen, X., Zhou, L., & Li, Z. (2019). AML‑derived mesenchymal stem cells upregulate CTGF expression through the BMP pathway and induce K562‑ADM fusiform transformation and chemoresistance. Oncology Reports, 42, 1035-1046. https://doi.org/10.3892/or.2019.7237
MLA
Li, H., Li, J., Cheng, J., Chen, X., Zhou, L., Li, Z."AML‑derived mesenchymal stem cells upregulate CTGF expression through the BMP pathway and induce K562‑ADM fusiform transformation and chemoresistance". Oncology Reports 42.3 (2019): 1035-1046.
Chicago
Li, H., Li, J., Cheng, J., Chen, X., Zhou, L., Li, Z."AML‑derived mesenchymal stem cells upregulate CTGF expression through the BMP pathway and induce K562‑ADM fusiform transformation and chemoresistance". Oncology Reports 42, no. 3 (2019): 1035-1046. https://doi.org/10.3892/or.2019.7237