Role of anabolic agents in colorectal carcinogenesis: Myths and realities (Review)

Krasanakis,Theodore; Nikolouzakis,Taxiarchis   Konstantinos; Sgantzos,Markos; Mariolis‑Sapsakos,Theodore; Souglakos,John; Spandidos,Demetrios  A.; Tsitsimpikou,Christina; Tsatsakis,Aristidis; Tsiaoussis,John

doi:10.3892/or.2019.7351

Role of anabolic agents in colorectal carcinogenesis: Myths and realities (Review)

Authors:
- Theodore Krasanakis
- Taxiarchis Konstantinos Nikolouzakis
- Markos Sgantzos
- Theodore Mariolis‑Sapsakos
- John Souglakos
- Demetrios A. Spandidos
- Christina Tsitsimpikou
- Aristidis Tsatsakis
- John Tsiaoussis
View Affiliations

Affiliations: Laboratory of Anatomy‑Histology‑Embryology, Medical School, University of Crete, 71110 Heraklion, Greece, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, University of Thessaly, 41221 Larissa, Greece, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Agioi Anargyroi General and Oncologic Hospital of Kifisia, 14564 Athens, Greece, Department of Medical Oncology, University General Hospital of Heraklion, 71110 Heraklion, Greece, Laboratory of Clinical Virology, Medical School, University of Crete, 71409 Heraklion, Greece, General Chemical State Laboratory of Greece, 11521 Athens, Greece, Department of Forensic Sciences and Toxicology, Medical School, University of Crete, 71409 Heraklion, Greece
Published online on: October 3, 2019 https://doi.org/10.3892/or.2019.7351
Pages: 2228-2244
Copyright: © Krasanakis et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License.

Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )

Metrics: Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )

Cited By (CrossRef): 0 citations Loading Articles...

Abstract

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the four leading causes of cancer‑related mortality worldwide. Even though over the past few decades the global scientific community has made tremendous efforts to understand this entity, many questions remain to be raised on this issue and even more to be answered. Epidemiological findings have unveiled numerous environmental and genetic risk factors, each one contributing to a certain degree to the final account of new CRC cases. Moreover, different trends have been revealed regarding the age of onset of CRC between the two sexes. That, in addition to newly introduced therapeutic approaches for various diseases based on androgens, anti‑androgens and anabolic hormones has raised some concerns regarding their possible carcinogenic effects or their synergistic potential with other substances/risk factors, predisposing the individual to CRC. Notably, despite the intense research on experimental settings and population studies, the conclusions regarding the majority of anabolic substances are ambiguous. Some of these indicate the carcinogenic properties of testosterone, dihydrotestosterone (DHT), growth hormone and insulin‑like growth factor (IGF) and others, demonstrating their neutral nature or even their protective one, as in the case of vitamin D. Thus, the synergistic nature of anabolic substances with other CRC risk factors (such as type 2 diabetes mellitus, metabolic syndrome and smoking) has emerged, suggesting a more holistic approach.

Introduction

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the fourth most common type of malignancy after breast, lung and prostate cancer, accounting for 49,190 deaths annually in the USA alone (1). Numerous risk factors have been identified, such as age, a family history of CRC, ethnic background (individuals of African descent), a high carbohydrate diet, poor physical activity, obesity and metabolic syndrome, smoking and alcohol abuse (2–5). Originating from epithelial cells at the base of intestinal crypts, the current model of carcinogenesis is that of the adenoma-carcinoma sequence, first described in the 1990s by Bert Vogelstein and Kenneth Kinzler [Fearon and Vogelstein (6) and Kinzler and Vogelstein (7)]. This model proposed a sequential transformation of the normal colorectal epithelium to an adenoma that could further transform into an invasive and metastatic tumor (carcinoma). Mutations in key regions begin to aggregate, turning normal mucosa to an early adenoma and, after a certain point of no return, the accumulated genetic alterations transform it to a carcinoma. Chromosomal instability, microsatellite instability, CpG island methylation and activating oncogenic mutations in genes such as adenomatous polyposis coli (APC), K-ras and p53 are found to play a key role in this sequence (7–9).

However, as it was found thereafter, the Vogelstein model could explain 90–95% of CRC cases. The remaining 5–10% of cases were found to be germline-inherited cancers, such as familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) and hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC). Notably, 2–3% of all CRC cases are associated with pre-existing inflammation and are referred to as colitis-associated cancer (CAC) (10). In these cases, the activation of nuclear factor (NF)-κB signaling in tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) leads to the indirect activation of signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT)3 in pre-malignant intestinal epithelial cells (IECs) (11,12). Even though epidemiologic studies have witnessed a shift towards younger age groups over the past decade, the age group most commonly affected remains that of the middle-aged (>50 years of age) (13), a finding closely related to the Vogelstein model (the accumulation of mutations) (14,15).

Moreover, although CRC is not considered a sex-related malignancy per se, sex differences in incidence rates do exist (16–21). As far as the male population is considered, cancer incidence exhibits two peaks; the first one appears before the age of 35 and the second after the age of 55. On the other hand, in the female population, there is a single peak trend, between 35 and 54 years of age (22,23). Taking into consideration that physical activity performed before or after cancer diagnosis is related to a reduced mortality risk among CRC survivors (24) and is therefore recommended, along with the high prevalence of the use/misuse and abuse of anabolic agents with hormonal activity, such as testosterone, dihydrotestosterone (DHT), finasteride, insulin, insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) and growth hormone (GH) in the sports community over the past decades (25), a great concern of any possible carcinogenic properties or synergistic effects of the anabolic agents with the already well-studied and identified CRC risk factors has emerged (5). Nonetheless, the data are not consistent: An increasing body of evidence indicates that adequate levels of vitamin D, structurally related to a number of anabolic agents, can indeed protect against carcinogenesis via genomic and non-genomic mechanisms. In addition, the general population experiences uncontrolled multi-chemical exposure from several different sources at doses around or well below regulatory limits (pesticides, food additives, lifestyle products components) (5,15,26) that can contribute to genotoxicity, endocrine disruption, target organ toxicity (3,4,27–29) by affecting systemic mechanistic pathways, such as oxidative stress and cell aging (14,30–32). These, along with the finding that human colorectal adenocarcinomas express specific steroid hormone receptors (33–40), has sparked the interest of the scientific community to unveil any possible pathogenetic mechanisms. Nonetheless, an increasing body of evidence indicates that adequate levels of vitamin D, structurally related to a number of anabolic agents, can indeed protect against carcinogenesis via genomic and non-genomic mechanisms.

Androgens

An androgen is considered any molecule capable of inducing and maintaining the male phenotype in an organism (male primary and secondary sexual characteristics and fertility) and taking part in the universal outgrowth of the musculoskeletal system and the anabolic shift of the metabolic status (41). Generally, the androgen-producing endocrine glands are able to synthesize five androgens via a sole pathway: Testosterone, dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHEAS), dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA), androstenedione and androstenediol, the latter of which has both androgenic and estrogenic properties. The molecules that prevail in this category are testosterone (the principal androgen in mammals) and DHT (potent metabolite of testosterones). In fact, they are the only androgens with direct androgenic activity. Other molecules, such as DHEA, due to their inferior potency, have received less attention. In an adult male organism, testosterone is primarily produced by Leydig cells in the testes. In addition, the extra-gonadal synthesis of testosterone and DHT by the adrenal testosterone precursor, DHEA, also occurs (42). Although adrenal androgens represent a minor fraction of the circulating testosterone for an adult male with an intact androgen biosynthesis cascade, they can be the main androgens in a female or a pre-puberty male (43). In the majority of cases, the classical mode of action of androgen superfamily is mediated by the androgen receptor.

Anabolic androogenic steroids (AAS) are used in the treatment of several disorders, such as hypogonadism, cachexia of various etiologies, hypercalcemia, hypercalciuria, in oncology as a supportive treatment and other chronic diseases (44). Since the early 1930s, AAS have been extensively used by amateur and professional athletes and the general public for the improvement of their physical condition and athletic performance (45–49). When used for ergogenic or recreational purposes, the dose levels are usually 5ement of physical condition and athletic performance (47,50,51). At such supraphysiological levels, AAS can cause a number of severe side-effects, including liver dysfunction, renal disorders, cardiotoxicity and potentially, stroke (52). In addition, anti-androgen therapy is also relatively common, having a wide variety of applications ranging from severe conditions (such as the treatment of prostate cancer and polycystic ovary syndrome) to more benign or even aesthetic conditions (such as acne and male pattern hair-loss). Thus, given their wide use in modern society, it is reasonable to scrutinize whether misbalanced androgen levels may possibly have a direct or indirect connection with CRC (41). In the following paragraphs, the current data regarding androgens and CRC will be presented according to the clinical significance of the studied molecule.

Natural androgens

Testosterone

Testosterone, being the most clinically important androgen, has attracted scientific interest from as early as 1986. At that time, studies advocated that androgens played a protective role against CRC. In detail, Izbicki et al (1986) conducted experiments on 40 male rats. They found that chemical castration increased colonic tumor incidence, while testosterone administration following surgical castration produced a borderline statistically significant reduction in tumor incidence (P<0.053), particularly in the right colon (22). In recent years, hypotestosteronemia (defined as levels of testosterone <11 nmol/l or 320 ng/dl) was found to contribute to the development of CRC (53). Further data indicating the protective role of testosterone came from studies on patients who received androgen deprivation treatment for prostate cancer. In detail, it was found that the group with the higher risk of developing CRC was that of the orchiectomized male patients followed by patients receiving gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist therapy (particularly if the treatment was prolonged) (54). On the contrary, there is evidence to suggest that androgens may act as promoters of colon carcinogenesis (2,55–57). Experiments using genetically modified mice, found that in orchiectomized males, the tumor load was lower when there was no administration of male hormone replacement therapy (2). Other researchers have indicated that, at an early stage, androgens may play an active role in the transition from adenoma to carcinoma (6). In contrast to both previous statements, a large study on 4,165 males aged 70–88 years demonstrated that increased testosterone levels were associated neither with an increased nor with a decreased risk of colon cancer risk (58). The same conclusion was achieved by a prospective study of 8,771 males and females from the general population of Denmark, who were followed-up for >30 years (59). Whichever the case may be, androgens can be related to CRC either through direct mechanisms (mediated through androgen receptors), indirect mechanisms (smoking and alcohol habits, metabolic syndrome and type 2 diabetes mellitus, altered gut microbiota and increased stress hormones) or even a combination of both (60). Worthy of mention is the fact that regardless of the nature of the study (in vitro, in vivo or epidemiological), a common ground has yet to be found given the opposing data derived from these studies. Thus, in order to reach a consensus on the possible carcinogenetic properties of testosterones and the circumstances under which they appear, and to provide the grounds for a safe comparison between studies, research teams will have to adopt a common methodology as the basis of their experiments (27).

DHEA

Despite being less extensively studied, opposing results have been obtained on this less potent molecule as well. In an observational study on 170 individuals, the plasma levels of dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate were shown to be inversely associated with the risk of developing colon cancer (with a borderline statistical significance) (61). Moreover, another study proposed that DHEA strongly blunts serum deprivation-induced apoptosis. The anti-apoptotic effects of DHEA have been found to be completely reversed by testosterone through the blockade of DHEA receptors, thereby antagonizing its actions (62).

Mode of action

There are namely two modes of action, direct action and indirect action. These are discussed below.

a) Direct action: Androgen receptors (ARs)

Steroid hormones, and thus androgens, exert their effects mainly through interactions with specific receptor proteins (37,56). The presence of ARs in human colonic tumors was first shown by Alford et al (34). The gene encoding the AR is located on the X chromosome. It contains two polymorphic trinucleotide repeat segments that encode polyglutamine (CAG) and polyglycine (GGC) (normally, ranging from 6 to 39 repeats). Surprisingly, only the number of CAG repeats has been found to be associated with misbalanced androgen levels. In fact, studies have demonstrated an inverse association between the number of repeats and the risk of prostate cancer (63,64). According to Hoque et al, the number of these repeats is gradually reduced in prostate cancers (65). Existing data advocate that fewer CAG repeats result in a higher transcription activity of AR, a finding positively associated with prostate cancer (66,67). In parallel, a greater number of repeats are associated with increased serum androgen levels, indicating a protective role of these against CRC (61,66).

Notably, Westberg et al came across a sex-related difference in the association between the number of the CAG repeats and the risk of developing CRC. The association was found to be direct in males, but inverse in females. They concluded that the inverse association observed in females would imply a stimulatory rather than inhibitory influence of AR on androgen production. A possible explanation could be found in the implication of both the AR and the estrogen receptor b (ERb) in the regulation of serum androgen levels (68). The above-mentioned hypothesis was reinforced by the similar findings of Slattery et al, who analyzed two large case-control studies of CRC. They further found a greater chance of microsatellite instability (MSI) or p53 mutated tumors in the male population when more CAG repeats were present in the AR gene. Their concern was the lack of a common accepted parameter to determine the regulation of androgen levels. It has not yet been established whether the CAG repeat (as suggested by haplotype analysis of the AR gene) or the functionality of the receptor for the specific polymorphism is the most informative variant (64).

The above-mentioned results are in discordance with a following larger scale study of 1,798 CRC cases and 1,810 controls. In that study, the implication of the AR CAG repeat polymorphism in colorectal cancer prognosis was investigated for the first time. Of note, no association was found between the above-mentioned polymorphism and CRC overall or the disease-specific survival rate. As outlined by the authors, the genotyping error rate calculated from the duplicated samples was relatively high for the AR CAG repeat polymorphism (69). A genotyping error occurs when the genotype of an individual observed in the laboratory does not correspond to the individual's true genotype (70). The causes could be categorized as a variation of the DNA sequence, the low quantity or quality of DNA, biochemical artifacts (low quality reagents, poor equipment precision or reliability, Taq polymerase errors, the lack of specificity, electrophoresis artifact) and human error (sample manipulation, experimental error, data handling) (71). Since the main cause of genotyping error is human error (71), Rudolph et al concluded that further studies are required to extract solid results (69).

Further attempts to unveil a possible prognostic value of the AR CAG repeat sequence with regards to sex differences have yielded some interesting findings. A recent case-control study of 550 CRC cases and 540 healthy controls concluded that long CAG repeats confer an increased risk of developing CRC in both sexes along with a poor 5-year survival, while fewer CAG repeats seem to protect against CRC (72). Previous studies have indicated that the CAG repeat length of AR inversely affects its transactivation potential, either through directly altering the receptor's function (73) or indirectly reducing AR messenger in RNA and protein levels (74). Either way, long CAG repeat sequences lead to absence of AR expression, which, in turn, has been linked to tumor size >5 cm in diameter and moderate to poor differentiation (at T3-T4 and N1-2 stages). These patients have also demonstrated a great risk of recurrence or metastasis. Notably, the above are found less frequently when there are short CAG repeat sequences and, thus, the normal expression of AR (72).

It should be pointed out that the trans-activating function of AR is dependent on its ligands, the androgens. The receptor participation in controlling cellular differentiation and proliferation in hormone-dependent tissues does not always occur in the same manner (75). Catalano et al shed some light onto this phenomenon. They mentioned two isoforms of the AR; androgen receptor A (AR-A) (87 kDa) and androgen receptor B (AR-B) (110 kDa). In the healthy colonic mucosa, both receptors are present; however, in the neoplastic colonic mucosa, only AR-A could be detected. The loss of expression of AR-B and the continuous expression of AR-A was proposed to indicate a loss of cell differentiation (76).

Another category of AR was also discovered; the membrane androgen receptors (mARs). Normally, the actions of the androgens are mediated through intracellular receptors (iARs). mARs seem to mediate opposite actions than iARs, inducing tumor regression (77). Furthermore, the affinity and selectivity of mARs differ among specific androgens (78). Through this receptor, testosterone exerts pro-apoptotic effects in both prostate and colon cancer cells. In human colon cancer cell lines, the activation of the ligand-bound androgen receptor suppresses the transcription of β-catenin. Consequently, there is a decreased expression of β-catenin target oncogenes, including cyclin D1 (79).

The long-term activation of mAR by testosterone-albumin conjugated (TAC) treatment has also been linked to the dephosphorylation of protein Kinase B (Akt) both in vitro and in vivo (77). It is closely connected with the invasiveness of colon cancer cells in response to a variety of stimuli [heregulin, P21 (RAC1) activated kinase 1 (PAK1), Sprouty-2 etc.] (80–82), a finding supported through the examination of the upstream regulators of Akt, in particular PI3K. Upon long-term TAC treatment, it is dephosphorylated, leading to reduced cell motility in colon cancer and, consequently, invasiveness. Of note, although testosterone seems to induce p-Akt downregulation when it binds to mARs, iAR bondage induces p-Akt upregulation, even within the same cells. The main target of mAR activation that may regulate cell motility is thought to be vinculin; a cytoskeletal protein which links integrin adhesion molecules to actin. The inhibition or silencing of vinculin via the phosphorylation by specific inhibitors, as is the case with activation of mARs, largely reverses both actin reorganization and the inhibition of migration (77). An illustrated representation of the mode of action of mAR is presented in Fig. 1.

Figure 1.

Actions of membrane androgen receptors (mARs). mARs have been found to mediate opposing actions to the intracellular androgen receptors. They induce apoptosis through the activation of caspase-3. Furthermore, they phosphorylate vinculin in cancer cells, leading to the inhibition of their migration. The suppression of β-catenin transcription leads to decreased expression of β-catenin target oncogenes, including cyclin D1. Finally, the long-term activation of mAR has been linked to the dephosphorylation of PI3K. As a result, Akt is downregulated and the motility of the colon cancer cells and their invasiveness are reduced. IGF-R, insulin-like growth factor receptor; IRS-1, insulin receptor substrate 1; IGFBPs, insulin-like growth factor binding proteins; ERK, extracellular signal-regulated kinase; VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor.

Upstream in the AR activation pathway, the role of co-activator-associated arginine methyltransferase 1 (CARM1) is crucial. CARM1 is a protein with arginine-specific histone methyltransferase activity. It primarily binds to the histone and p160 co-activators, leading to the activation of nuclear receptors, ARs included. Thus, it promotes nuclear receptor activity and acts as a molecular switch for gene-specific transcription factors including p53, NF-ĸB, lymphoid enhancer-binding factor 1 (LEF1)/transcription factor 4 (TCF-4) and E2Fs (83,84). Taking the above into consideration, it is clear that the role of CARM1 is of utmost importance for cell proliferation and survival (85,86). Kim et al reported the overexpression of CARM1 in CRC specimens, but a weak expression in normal mucosal cells. They demonstrated that CARM1 inhibits the p53 response and instead promotes the NF-ĸB response in Caco2 cells (87). However, the mechanisms involved remain to be fully clarified (87,88).

b) Indirect mode of action

Decreased levels of androgens seem to lead to a net increase in stress hormone levels, such as cortisol, which affect the tumor environment (89). The involvement of the innate immune system in the development of CRC has been demonstrated as well. The neutrophil count is reduced, as found by Chuang et al in castrated males, although it can be restored to normal levels through androgen supplementation (90). Androgens also seem to affect the production and excretion of biliary steroids and bile, compounds that are suggested to act as co-carcinogens (17,38). Lastly, an induction of insulin resistance following androgen deprivation therapy (91) has been linked to increased risk of developing CRC (92). The connection between insulin and CRC will be further discussed.

Synthetic anabolic agents

Synthetic anabolic agents are categorized into two categories: Anabolic-androgenic steroids (AAS) and selective androgen receptor modulators (SARMs) (93). The AAS molecules that have thus far been approved as therapeutic agents are testosterone, nortestosterone, dihydrochlormethyltestosterone (DHCMT), metenolon, metandienone, methyltestosterone, oxandrolone, fluoxymesterone, stanozolol, formestane, 5on, metandieno (94). SARMS are non-steroidal alternatives to AAS with the selective activation of the AR in either muscle tissue or bones (93).

A number of adverse effects of these compounds have been described when used either as medicine or as doping agents. As far as AAS's relation to cancer is concerned, a positive association with hepatocellular carcinoma (95), renal cancer (96–98), soft tissue carcinoma (99), adenocarcinoma (100,101) and lymphosarcoma (102) has been found, along with a case report hypothesizing their involvement in leiomyosarcoma (103). SARMs have also been linked to prostate cancer (104). However, to the best of our knowledge, there are currently no data available in the current literature associating any of these compounds with CRC.

Anabolic hormones

Insulin and insulin receptors (IRs)

Insulin is one of the principal anabolic hormones in the majority of animals since it regulates the metabolism of almost all key energy points in favor of their synthesis and storage. The target substances of insulin k are namely carbohydrates, lipids and proteins. Acting on adipocytes, hepatocytes and muscle cells, induces and maintains to a certain extent, an anabolic state which is described by the synthesis of carbohydrates, fatty acids and proteins, while reducing their degradation. Although a basic requirement is the prior balance between the circulating levels of the target substances and the intracellular ones, for a short period of time, it can overcome the concentration gradient of a substance and induce its endocytosis (105). The role of insulin in CRC was first introduced by the observation that obesity was associated with an increased risk of developing CRC in males. Subsequently, hyperinsulinemia and insulin resistance were linked to obesity and CRC development (106). In a large epidemiological study of almost 25,000 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (107) and in a large meta-analysis of 16 studies (108), a direct association between long-term insulin therapy and type 2 diabetes mellitus with an increased risk of developing CRC was found. It has also been established that CRC survivors with excess amounts of blood insulin have a greater risk of recurrence (109). By contrast, a large registry-based study in Connecticut that included 9,395 patients with CRC (110) and a smaller Norwegian study of 1,194 hospitalized patients with CRC (111), failed to find an association between diabetes and CRC-specific death. It must be stated though, that the latter studies included patients with metastatic CRC as well.

Schoen et al found a statistically significant association between insulin and adenoma status. The association was even stronger with advanced adenomas. The association with adenomatous polyps, the precursor of CRC, confirms a link between insulin and early neoplasia (112). It must be kept in mind that high insulin levels increase serum IGF-1 levels (113,114), a factor which is closely related to carcinogenesis.

To date, two isoforms of IR have been described, differing at the short exon 11 (encodes 12 amino acids). The absence of exon 11 transcripts the IR-A (short isoform), while its presence the IR-B (long isoform) (115). Existing evidence supports that the two IR isoforms play different biological roles. IR-A mostly exerts mitogenic effects and IR-B modulates cell metabolism (116). Abbruzzese et al found a strong IR expression in adenomas and low-grade adenocarcinomas (117). The expression of IR-A has been found in cells that have lost their differentiation, a finding which is in accordance with the presence of this receptor in cancer (118,119).

The expression of IR is mainly considered to be present in epithelial tumor cells [epithelial insulin receptor (EIR)]. However, Heckl et al found the expression of the receptor in other tumor compartments, e.g., the tumor-vasculature [vascular insulin receptor (VIR)]. When 1,580 cases of CRC were examined concerning the expression of the IR, differential expression patterns of the IR in tumor cells (EIR) and endothelial cells of tumor vessels (VIR) have been observed. EIR expression is strongly associated with distant metastasis, lymphatic invasion, lymph node metastasis, tumor-specific survival (TSS) and overall survival (OS). Moreover, EIR has been found almost exclusively in the cytoplasm of tumor cells, whereas a (simultaneous) membranous IR expression was less prevalent (120). These findings were further clarified by in vitro experiments by Morcavallo et al, who demonstrated that insulin or IGF-II stimulation induced the phosphorylation-activation of IR-A, which was then internalized from the cell surface. The underlying mechanism was speculated to be a sustained phosphorylation of the receptor, leading to prolonged activation (121).

On the other hand, VIRs are thought to contribute to neovascularization following abduction by elevated insulin levels. VIRs are frequently found in CRC, particularly in left-sided CRCs, and they are significantly associated with tumor invasiveness (120).

From another point of view, insulin resistance in vascular endothelial cells can promote tumor formation, possibly through mechanisms involving chronic inflammation (122). This resistance is characteristic of endothelial dysfunction in obesity and type 2 diabetes (123–126) and was found to promote tumor development. By contrast, there was almost no effect of insulin signaling on intestinal carcinogenesis through epithelial receptors (122).

In order to fully understand the role of insulin in the tumor cascade, special reference must be made to extracellular vesicles (EVs). These are vesicles found in the extracellular space of various cell types. They can be found under normal and pathological conditions (127,128). EVs package biologically active content (including proteins, mRNA and miRNA), which they further transfer to the recipient cells. Due to their action they are considered as mediators of signaling cascades (129,130). EVs are known to mediate various biological cascades relative to cancer, such as the activation of Wnt signaling and the activation of PI3K/Akt signaling (129).

Insulin, similar to other growth factors, induces PI3K/Akt signaling (131–133). PI3K/Akt-positive CRC cells react to PI3K/Akt signaling by producing EVs which, in turn, amplify the proliferative signal in other CRC cells in the close environment. The deeper in the proliferative core the EVs reach, the greater the benefit for the tumor, as in these areas the transfer of nutrients/growth factors would have been otherwise impossible. Thus, EVs amplify the proliferative signal and aid cancer progression (134).

IGF and its receptor (IGF-R)

IGF is a hormone that serves as the mediator of growth hormone (GH)-stimulated somatic growth, as well as a mediator of GH-independent anabolic responses in a number of cells and tissues, while it is also associated with mitogenesis, cell survival and differentiation (135–142). In detail, IGF-1 promotes cell cycle progression and inhibits apoptosis either by triggering other growth factors or by interacting with pathways which have an established role in carcinogenesis and cancer promotion (142). Ma et al stated that there is an increase in IGF-1 levels in patients with CRC (143), while other studies have advocated the overexpression of IGF-R, as well (144–147). In accordance with this, several studies have linked elevated plasma IGF-1 and IGF-1R downstream signaling to an enhanced risk of colorectal neoplasia and a poor survival (148–152). Furthermore, Peters et al found that IGF-1 was closely related to the expression of the proliferation marker Ki-67 (153). Ki-67 is a nuclear protein that is active only in dividing cells and absent in cells locked in G0 phase. This is a logical outcome when taking into consideration that IGF-1 can stimulate the expression of cyclin D1, a molecule that accelerates the progression of the cell cycle from G1 to S phase (154). However, there is no prognostic relevance of Ki-67 in CRC, regardless of the stage of disease (155,156). Through a reverse line of thought, octreotide, a molecule that lowers the IGF-1 concentration, has been shown to attenuate the growth rate of tumor cells in vivo (157).

The expression of IGF-2 is also highly associated with tumor stage. The association was speculated when it was found that autocrine IGF-2 production and consequent IGF-R activation increased tumor growth and reduced apoptosis (153). Thus, it is plausible that, when IGF-1 or IGF-2 is present, an IGF-1R self-stimulation will produce an autocrine/paracrine loop in CRC. However, no prognostic effect of IGF-1 and IGF-2 has been proven (153).

A family of six circulating proteins termed insulin-like growth factor binding proteins (IGFBPs) has been found to interfere with the action of IGF. Thus, their involvement in CRC must be investigated, as well. They act either as tumor suppressors by limiting IGFs activity (158) or as inhibitors of cancer growth through IGF-independent mechanisms (159). High IGFBP2 plasma levels were found by Liou et al to be independently associated with a reduced overall survival (OS) of patients with CRC (160). By contrast, IGFBP3 has been shown to be inversely associated with CRC, as its plasma levels were found to be lower in those patients (143). Notably, IGFBP-3 can either oppose or enhance the biologic action of IGF-I through direct bondage to IGF-I or indirectly to IGF-R (161).

In a prospective cohort study of 210 patients with CRC, IGF-1 expression was shown to be closely associated with tumor size and the depth of invasion. However, it was stated that a shift of investigation towards the IGF-1/IGFBP-3 ratio is warranted, as it better describes the biological effects of IGF-1 (152). A nested case control study of males in the Physician's Health Study demonstrated an increased risk of CRC in subjects with high IGF-I levels. The risk was decreased when high IGFBP-3 levels were measured (143). A study of 460 patients was carried out to further examine the association between IGF-I and the IGF-I/IGFBP-3 ratio with colorectal adenomatous polyps. A statistically significant positive association was found, with greater odds ratio when the case group was limited to advanced adenomas. This finding indicates a possible stimulation of non-advanced adenomas towards advanced adenomas (112).

Closer attention must be paid to the IGF-R, as it has been stated that it contributes to resistance to cytotoxic (162), radiation (163) and targeted therapies (164–166). Indeed, the silencing of the receptor increases the intracellular drug concentration (such as oxaliplatin and vincristine); an effect mediated via the PI3K/Akt pathway (167). A progressive increase in IGF-1R expression occurs in normal colonic mucosa, while it transits to adenomatous, as well as in the transition from adenomatous to carcinomatous tissue (147). Peters et al have confirmed a strong expression of the IGF-1 receptor in >99% of all CRC cell lines of their experiments (153).

Following its activation, IGF-R induces multiple intracellular mechanisms, as shown in Fig. 2. It induces the transcription of the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) gene (168,169), upregulates the anti-apoptotic protein, Bcl-xL (170) and inhibits the action of β-catenin (through PI3K/Akt activation) (171). From another perspective, Nahor et al demonstrated that the tumor-suppression genes p63 and p73 inhibit the IGF-1R promoter, reducing the endogenous IGF-1R levels in a dose-dependent manner. Through this mechanism, it was proposed that they control colon cancer proliferation (172).

Figure 2.

Mechanisms mediated through IGF-1/IGF-1R. The activation of IGF-1R takes place following the bondage of IGF-1 (or IGF-2) to the extracellular part of the receptor. IGF-1 plasma levels, and thus IGF-1R activation, are reduced by the IGFBPs. However, IGFBP-3 can act as an enhancer of the IGF-1 activity when it is bonded to the receptor and not directly to IGF-1. Following its activation, IGF-1R induces the phosphorylation of IRS-1,2 molecules, which they further activate the PI3K-Akt pathway. Consequently, there is induction of cell survival, cell cycle progression, cell proliferation and VEGF transcription. At the same time, apoptosis is inhibited and the cell gains resistance against cancer therapies. Even when IRS-1,2 molecules are silenced, the activation of IGF-1R leads to increased cell proliferation through the activation of Shc-ERK pathway. IRS-1, insulin receptor substrate 1; IGFBPs, insulin-like growth factor binding proteins; ERK, extracellular signal-regulated kinase; VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor.

The pro-oncogenic activities of IGF-1R are solely mediated through its proximal downstream effectors: Insulin receptor substrate 1 (IRS-1) and 2 (IRS-2) (173,174). IRS-1 expression appears to be inversely associated with CRC differentiation. However, it may be upregulated in both primary and metastatic human CRC, a finding that has not been observed in normal colonic epithelium (175). It has been further supported that the upregulation of IRS-1 can occur directly from androgens (64). IRS-2 mRNA and protein expression have a positive association with the transition from normal colorectal epithelium to adenoma and adenocarcinoma. Furthermore, IRS-2 overexpression promotes the invasiveness of CRC cells. It activates the oncogenic PI3K/Akt pathway and at the same time reduces cell adhesion (176). Finally, IRS-1 and IRS-2 polymorphisms have been independently associated with the risk of developing CRC in a direct manner (177).

The above-mentioned findings are further supported by the action of NT157 in murine and human CRC cells. NT157 is a molecule that, through bondage to an allosteric site of the IGF-1R, it induces a conformational change. As a result, the receptor is dissociated from IRS1 and IRS2 proteins. Consequently, IGF-1R stronger interacts with the adaptor protein Shc, leading to an enhanced activation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK). Indeed, experiments have confirmed that NT157 activates ERK1/2, without activating Akt (178).

Vitamin D

Vitamin D regulates cellular functions, such as differentiation and proliferation in normal and malignant tissues. It also regulates cell adhesion in tumor cells and modifies tumor angiogenesis, invasion and metastasis along with decreasing oxidative DNA damage (179). Vitamin D deficiency has been associated with various cancer types (180,181).

Vitamin D first attracted scientific attention after an inverse association was observed between solar UV-B exposure and CRC incidence in both genres (182). As it has been well-established, UV-B radiation is essential for the production of vitamin D3, which after two steps becomes 1,25-(OH)2-vitamin D (calcitriol), the most active component (183,184).

The study by Boscoe and Schymura on 3.1 million individuals from the northern part of the USA supported that low levels of vitamin D can induce the progression of CRC, although no association was found with disease onset. Their proposal was based upon a higher death rate which occurred during the winter months (when levels of vitamin D are markedly reduced) (182). Feskanich et al found an inverse association of 25-OH-vitamin D and CRC in observation in the female population, although only in areas where high levels of UV-B are available (185). In fact, levels of 25-OH-vitamin D >20 ng/ml have been advocated to provide protection against CRC (186). If levels of 25-OH-vitamin D are >82 ng/ml, then it is estimated that the cancer incidence is decreased by 50% (187). However, no association has been found between 1,25-OH2-vitamin D and CRC (185); a finding disputing the results of two previous studies (188,189).

Calcitriol has been found to reduce tumorigenesis in rats (190,191) and proliferation in both normal and premalignant human rectal epithelioma (192), as well as in human colorectal cell lines, while it stimulates their differentiation (193–196). Vandewalle et al proposed that an increased expression of vitamin D receptor (VDR) may lead to cell differentiation and growth inhibition either through calcitriol or through non-calcemic analogs (195). The mechanisms behind the protective role of vitamin D against CRC are multiple and can be categorized into genomic and non-genomic mechanisms, as discussed below.

Genomic mechanisms

The genomic mechanisms are mediated through the VDR as is shown in Fig. 3. Following the bondage of 1,25-OH2-vitamin D to the receptor, the complex is dimerized with another receptor, the retinoid X receptor (RXR). This heterodimer targets specific areas in genes called vitamin D response elements (VDREs) (197). As a result, several miRNAs are affected through up- or down-regulation. These miRNAs have been speculated to suppress oncogenes or enhance the expression of tumor suppressor genes. For example, vitamin D can induce the promoter of miR-627. This gene has been inversely linked with CRC, as its decreased expression (an aftermath of reduced levels of vitamin D) has been found to promote cancer (198).

Figure 3.

Mechanisms mediated through vitamin D. The insertion of vitamin D into a colorectal cell triggers multiple pathways; both in the cytoplasm (non-genomic actions of vitamin D) and in the nucleus (genomic actions of vitamin D). Through its non-genomic actions, vitamin D halts tumor development through he inhibition of VEGF, EGF, Ras-signaling and TGF-β. At the same it induces IGFBP-5 production, diminishing this way the cancer-promoting effects of IGF-1,2. Also of importance is the reprogram of TAMs, which results in lower levels of IL-1 production. Consequently, the Wnt-pathway is halted, while apoptosis through the TRAIL pathway is triggered. Followin bondage with the VDR it can either bind β-catenin (inhibiting its translocation to the nucleus) or, after being heterodimerized with the RXR, translocates to the nucleus. In the nucleus, the complex vitamin D-VDR-RXR binds to VDREs gene sequences. As an aftermath, the induction of the anti-angiogenic factor thrombospondin 1 occurs, as well as apoptosis through the SPARC pathway and transcription of Wnt-inhibitors. Finally, the inhibition of NF-κB and TLR-2,4, while tumor growth is halted (through inhibition of CDK-Is, cyclin D1, c-myc, etc). ERK, extracellular signal-regulated kinase; VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor; TAMs, tumor-associated macrophages; VDR, vitamin D receptor; RXR, retinoid X receptor; VDREs, vitamin D response elements; SPARC, secreted protein acidic and rich in cysteine.

Further action of vitamin D in human colon tumor cells leads to the upregulation of the potent anti-angiogenic factor, thrombospondin 1 (199). The upregulation of the transcription of the Wnt-inhibitors, the DICKKOPF-1 and DICKKOPF-4 genes, has also been linked with the action of calcitriol (200). There are data to suggest that calcitriol regulates apoptosis as well (201). Following treatment of colorectal cell lines with 1,25-OH2-vitamin D, it was found that apoptosis was triggered through secreted protein acidic and rich in cysteine (SPARC)-induced VDR synthesis (202). In another cell line, treatment with calcitriol induced the mRNA expression of the pro-apoptotic protein, G0S2 (G0/G1 switch gene) (203). Furthermore, WAF1 and KIP1 were found to be up-regulated, leading to cell-cycle arrest in G1 phase (201,204,205).

Other studies have demonstrated the effects of calcitriol on tumor growth. Through the induction of cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors, such as p21, p27 and cystatin D and the inhibition of pro-proliferative genes, including c-my and cyclin D1, tumor growth is halted (198). NF-κB is another target family of genes (fundamental for the cancer cell survival) which are downregulated by vitamin D (206). Finally, the reduction of colon cancer cell lines has been suggested following the decreased expression of Toll-like receptor (TLR)2 and 4 on human monocytes (207).

Non genomic mechanisms

Apart from the genomic action through the nuclear receptor, calcitriol can bind to membrane receptors in certain tissues (including the intestines), leading to non-genomic, non-nuclear actions (208–211). It has been well documented that in CRC, APC mutation is by far one of the most common, allowing various downstream pro-oncogenic pathways to upshift. One of these pathways is the Wnt pathway, where β-catenin acts as a transcriptional co-regulator, cooperating with transcription factors of the T-cell factor (TCF) family to determine gene expression (212,213). Pendás-Franco et al described the protective action of calcitriol in colon cancer cells, according to which it induces VDR to bind with β-catenin and restrain it from translocating to the nucleus and inducing the expression of pro-carcinogenic genes (200). Furthermore, vitamin D-related compounds have been found to induce the production of IGFBP-5. These molecules bind both with IGF-1 and IGF-2, suppressing the stimulating effect of these molecules (214).

Furthermore, vitamin D seems to be able to reprogram the tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) in a manner that halts their tumor-promoting actions (215), probably by inhibiting STAT1 activity. As a result, there is no production of interleukin (IL)-1 from the latter, rendering the tumor colon cells sensitive to apoptosis through the TRAIL pathway (216). In parallel, due to the lack of IL-1β expression, the Wnt pathway is deactivated (215).

Further observations of a crosstalk between vitamin D and TGF-β1/SMAD1 signaling in the growth inhibition of human colon cancer-derived cells has shown that this interaction halts tumor growth by blocking the expression of cell cycle proteins and inhibiting the action of cyclins D1, D2, D3 and E (217). It has also been found to inhibit mitogenic Ras signaling, as well as the epidermal growth factor (EGF) (218–220). Furthermore, Ben-Shoshan et al exhibited an inhibition of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in colon cancer cell lines by vitamin D (221).

Last but not least, the association of vitamin D with calcium must be examined. It seems they exert a synergistic effect in reducing CRC incidence. This was first described in Apcmin mouse models by Harris and Go (222) and later on by Lappe et al who carried a clinical trial on post-menopausal women in Nebraska. They concluded that although calcium alone reduced the all-cancer incidence by 44%, when accompanied by vitamin D the reduction reached 77% (223).

Growth hormone (GH)

Human growth hormone (hGH) or somatotropin, is a peptide-hormone secreted mainly by somatotropic cells within the lateral wings of the anterior pituitary. After entering the bloodstream it reaches its target organs (namely the liver, muscles, bones and adipose tissue) binding to its receptor [growth hormone receptor (GHR)] and thus inducing its anabolic properties through the activation of the mitogen activated protein kinase (MAPK)/ERK and JAK/STAT pathways (224,225). It has been well documented that GH plays a key role in longitudinal growth during childhood, while maintaining various important metabolic functions throughout life (promoting lipolysis, protein synthesis and gluconeogenesis, while reducing glucose uptake from the liver) (226). Of note though, GH action is slightly more sophisticated. Apart from its direct action, an indirect one through the production of IGF-1 also takes place, representing an important part of GH physiology. In fact, a potent stimulus of IGF-1 production is the GH per se. Moreover, the tissues producing IGF-1 (the liver 75% and the peripheral tissues) are indeed the target organs of GH (227). However, it has been proven that GH is not only synthesized in the pituitary, but also in various other tissues, such as the large intestine, prostate and breast (228,229). In this case however, GH lacks the endocrine potential and its action is mainly restricted to an autocrine or paracrine manner (230).

Due to its proliferative properties, GH has attracted reasonable attention for its carcinogenic potential. In fact, various studies have demonstrated that GH is indeed able to create a favorable microenvironment for tumor cells. In detail, GH overexpression is linked to an increased risk of malignancies (231), while its downregulation is linked to a carcinoprotective state. As for CRC risk per se, GH has been proven to act as a tumor promoter in colon tissue by suppressing p53 (232), phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) and APC (8), while it has also been proven that colon cancer cells overexpress GHR (232). In fact, upregulated GH has been exhibited to increase ERK phosphorylation and to decrease APC expression (232). It is known that a decreased APC expression promotes the nuclear accumulation of β-catenin, which in turn increases Wnt signaling through the activation of pro-proliferative genes (233,234). Thus, even though it is difficult to estimate the exact concentration for any given age above which GH poses its carcinogenic effect on colon cells, there is enough evidence supporting that the ability of GH to change the microenvironment of tumor cells can have a synergistic effect with other CRC risk factors (such as intestinal dysbiosis, smoking etc.), shifting the balance towards tumor survival and proliferation (235).

Conclusions

After 30 years of intense research on CRC and its biological behavior, only few facts have withstood the test of time, all revealing the impressive complexity and diversity of this entity. In fact, this is the case for the association between CRC and anabolic substances. Driven by epidemiological observations on both sexes, a time pattern of CRC onset has been found. However, studies thus far have failed to reach a consensus regarding the direct connection between androgens and the risk of developing CRC, as some studies have indicated a negative effect, while others have pointed out a neutral or even a protective one (Table I). In the case of androgens, the androgen receptor (the principal mediator of their action) has been proven to be altered in CRC in contrast to healthy individuals. Moreover, anabolic substances are also put to scrutiny given the intense presence of such substances in patients with CRC (namely IGF-1). However, no direct or well-studied indirect mode of action on CRC pathogenesis has been found for both classes. Thus, more studies are needed that will focus on both epidemiologic data (that will try to investigate how the use of anabolic agents, androgens included, alters CRC statistics) and the elucidation of molecular pathways implicated in CRC, in order to allow the extraction of solid conclusions. In addition, as passive everyday life exposure to hazardous chemicals could affect traditional clinical risk factors and act synergistically, the patterns of living and consumers' trends should also be taken into consideration when evaluating CRC.

Table I.

Association between anabolic hormones and CRC.

Table I.

Association between anabolic hormones and CRC.

Substance	Relation to CRC	Author (year)/(Refs.)	Nature of the study
Testosterone	Physiological testosterone levels induce reduction in tumor incidence especially in right colon	Izbicki et al (1986) (22)	In vivo
	Hypotestosteronemia contributes to CRC	Gould and Petty (53)	In vivo
	development	Gillesen et al (54)	Epidemiological
	Androgens may act as promoters of CRC	Amos-Landgraf et al (2)	In vivo
		Izbicki et al (1983) (55)
		Mehta et al (56)
		Moon and Fricks (57)
	Androgens may play an active role in the adenoma => carcinoma sequence	Fearon and Vogelstein (6)	In vivo
	Increased testosterone levels have no connection	Hyde et al (58)	Epidemiological
	with CRC	Orsted et al (59)
Dehydroepiandrosterone	DHEA levels are inversely associated with	Alberg et al (61)	Epidemiological
(DHEA)	CRC risk	Anagnostopoulou et al (62)	In vitro
Androgen receptors	Number of CAG repeats is linearly correlated	Slattery et al (2005) (64)	Epidemiological
(ARs)	with CRC in men and inversely in women	Westberg et al (68)
	Number of CAG repeats is independent from	Rudolph et al (69)	Epidemiological
	CRC survival rate
	Long CAG repeats	Huang et al (72)	Epidemiological
	Increased risk for CRC in both sexes
	Poor 5-year survival
	High T and N stage
	Few CAG repeats protect against CRC
	mARs seem to mediate opposite actions than iARs	Gu et al (2011) (77)	In vitro
Synthetic	AASs positive correlation with a variety of	Watanabe and	Epidemiological
anabolic agents	cancers (among which is adenocarcinoma)	Kobayashi (95)
(AAS and SARMs)	SARMs are linked with prostate cancer but not	Rosner and Khan (96)
	with CRC	Martorana et al (97)
		Bryden et al (98)
		Zahm and Fraumeni (99)
		Bronson and Matherne (102)	In vivo
		Froehner et al (103)
		Chacon and Monga (104)
Insulin	Long-term insulin therapy/ high blood insulin	Yang et al (107)	Epidemiological
	levels	Larsson et al (108)
	Increased risk of CRC	Flood et al (109)
	Greater risk of CRC recurrence
	No connection between diabetes and CRC-specific	Polednak (110)	Epidemiological
	death	Jullumstrø et al (111)
Epithelial insulin	EIR expression results to distant metastasis,	Heckl et al (120)	Epidemiological
receptor (EIR)	lymphatic invasion, lymph node metastasis, tumor	Morcavallo et al (121)	In vitro
	specific survival and overall survival
Vascular insulin receptor	VIR is frequently found in CRC, especially	Heckl et al (120)	Epidemiological
(VIR)	in left-sided CRCs, and associated with tumor
	invasiveness
Insulin-like growth	High levels of IGF-1 are related with CRC	Soubry et al (149)	In vivo
factor 1 (IGF-1)		Lee et al (148)	In vitro
		Ma et al (143)	Epidemiological
		Ollberding et al (150)
		Giovannucci (2001) (151)
		Shiratsuchi et al (152)
	IGF-1 expression is associated with tumor	Shiratsuchi et al (152)	Epidemiological
	size and depth of invasion
IGFBPs	High IGFBP2 positively associated with reduced	Liou et al (160)	Epidemiological
	overall survival in CRC
Vitamin D	Low levels of vitamin D can induce the	Boscoe and Schymura	Epidemiological
	progression of CRC	(182)
	Levels of 25-OH-vitamin D >20ng/ml can protect	Braun et al (186)	Epidemiological
	against CRC	Gorham et al (187)
	Levels of 25-OH-vitamin D >82ng/ml cancer incidence is decreased by 50%
	Vitamin D can induce the promoter of onco-protective miR-627	Padi et al (198)	In vivo
	Vitamin D in human colon tumor cells up-regulates the potent anti-angiogenic factor thrombospondin 1	Fernandez-Garcia et al (199)	In vitro
	Vitamin D up-regulates the transcription of the Wnt-inhibitors DICKKOPF-1 and	Pendás-Franco et al (200)	In vitro
	DICKKOPF-4
	Vitamin D regulates apoptosis through SPARC	Ylikomi et al (201)	In vitro
		Taghizadeh et al (202)
	Vitamin D down-regulates NF-κB, TLR2 and	Liu et al (206)	In vitro
	TLR4	Kim and Brasitus (2001) (208)
	Vitamin D may be able to reprogram the tumor-associated macrophages (TAM) and halt their tumor-promoting actions	Kaler et al (215)	In vitro
Growth hormone (GH)	Growth hormone suppresses p53, PTEN, and APC	Brown-Borg et al (231)	Epidemiological
		Chesnokova et al (232)	In vivo
		Morin et al (233)	In vivo
		Clevers and Nusse (234)

[i] CRC, colorectal cancer; IGF, insulin-like growth factor; IGFBP, insulin-like growth factor binding protein; SPARC, secreted protein acidic and rich in cysteine; TLR, Toll-like receptor; PTEN, phosphatase and tensin homolog; APC, adenomatous polyposis coli.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

No funding was received.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Authors' contributions

JT conceived and designed the study. TK and TKN researched the literature, performed analysis of data and drafted the manuscript. DAS, CT and AT made substantial contributions to the conception of the study and critically revised the article for important intellectual content. MS, JS, TMS made substantial contributions to the design of the study and critically revised the article for important intellectual content. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Patient consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

DAS is the Editor-in-Chief for the journal, but had no personal involvement in the reviewing process, or any influence in terms of adjudicating on the final decision, for this article. The other authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Glossary

Abbreviations

Abbreviations:

CRC	colorectal cancer
DHT	dihydrotestosterone
IGF	insulin-like growth factor
FAP	familial adenomatous polyposis
HNPCC	hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer
CAC	colitis-associated cancer
TAMs	tumor-associated macrophages
STAT3	signal transducer and activator of transcription 3
IECs	intestinal epithelial cells
GH	growth hormone
DHEAS	dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate
DHEA	dehydroepiandrosterone
GnRH	gonadotropin-releasing hormone
ARs	androgen receptors
AAS	anabolic-androgenic steroids
SARMs	selective androgen receptor modulators
IR	insulin receptor
EIR	epithelial insulin receptor
VIR	vascular insulin receptor
IGF-R	insulin-like growth factor receptor
IGFBPs	insulin-like growth factor binding proteins
VDR	vitamin D receptor
VEGF	vascular endothelial growth factor
EGF	epidermal growth factor
RXR	retinoid X receptor
VDREs	vitamin D response elements

References

1	Roshan MH, Tambo A and Pace NP: The role of testosterone in colorectal carcinoma: Pathomechanisms and open questions. EPMA J. 7:222016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
2	Amos-Landgraf JM, Heijmans J, Wielenga MC, Dunkin E, Krentz KJ, Clipson L, Ederveen AG, Groothuis PG, Mosselman S, Muncan V, et al: Sex disparity in colonic adenomagenesis involves promotion by male hormones, not protection by female hormones. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 111:16514–16519. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
3	Docea AO, Goumenou M, Calina D, Arsene AL, Dragoi CM, Gofita E, Pisoschi CG, Zlatian O, Stivaktakis PD, Nikolouzakis TK, et al: Adverse and hormetic effects in rats exposed for 12 months to low dose mixture of 13 chemicals: RLRS part III. Toxicol Lett. 310:70–91. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
4	Tsatsakis AM, Docea AO, Calina D, Buga AM, Zlatian O, Gutnikov S, Kostoff RN and Aschner M: Hormetic Neurobehavioral effects of low dose toxic chemical mixtures in real-life risk simulation (RLRS) in rats. Food Chem Toxicol. 125:141–149. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
5	Tsatsakis AM, Kouretas D, Tzatzarakis MN, Stivaktakis P, Tsarouhas K, Golokhvast KS, Rakitskii VN, Tutelyan VA, Hernandez AF, Rezaee R, et al: Simulating real-life exposures to uncover possible risks to human health: A proposed consensus for a novel methodological approach. Hum Exp Toxicol. 36:554–564. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
6	Fearon ER and Vogelstein B: A genetic model for colorectal tumorigenesis. Cell. 61:759–767. 1990. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
7	Kinzler KW and Vogelstein B: Lessons from hereditary colorectal cancer. Cell. 87:159–170. 1996. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
8	Vogelstein B and Kinzler KW: Cancer genes and the pathways they control. Nat Med. 10:789–799. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
9	Nikolouzakis TK, Vassilopoulou L, Fragkiadaki P, Mariolis Sapsakos T, Papadakis GZ, Spandidos DA, Tsatsakis AM and Tsiaoussis J: Improving diagnosis, prognosis and prediction by using biomarkers in CRC patients (Review). Oncol Rep. 39:2455–2472. 2018.PubMed/NCBI
10	Terzic J, Grivennikov S, Karin E and Karin M: Inflammation and colon cancer. Gastroenterology. 138:2101–2114.e5. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
11	Greten FR, Eckmann L, Greten TF, Park JM, Li ZW, Egan LJ, Kagnoff MF and Karin M: IKKbeta links inflammation and tumorigenesis in a mouse model of colitis-associated cancer. Cell. 118:285–296. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
12	Grivennikov S, Karin E, Terzic J, Mucida D, Yu GY, Vallabhapurapu S, Scheller J, Rose-John S, Cheroutre H, Eckmann L, et al: IL-6 and Stat3 are required for survival of intestinal epithelial cells and development of colitis-associated cancer. Cancer Cell. 15:103–113. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
13	Chlebowski RT, Wactawski-Wende J, Ritenbaugh C, Hubbell FA, Ascensao J, Rodabough RJ, Rosenberg CA, Taylor VM, Harris R, Chen C, et al Women's Health Initiative Investigators, : Estrogen plus progestin and colorectal cancer in postmenopausal women. N Engl J Med. 350:991–1004. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
14	Tsoukalas D, Fragkiadaki P, Docea AO, Alegakis AK, Sarandi E, Thanasoula M, Spandidos DA, Tsatsakis A, Razgonova MP and Calina D: Discovery of potent telomerase activators: Unfolding new therapeutic and anti-aging perspectives. Mol Med Rep. 20:3701–3708. 2019.PubMed/NCBI
15	Tsatsakis AM, Docea AO and Tsitsimpikou C: New challenges in risk assessment of chemicals when simulating real exposure scenarios; simultaneous multi-chemicals' low dose exposure. Food Chem Toxicol. 96:174–176. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
16	Potter JD and McMichael AJ: Large bowel cancer in women in relation to reproductive and hormonal factors: A case-control study. J Natl Cancer Inst. 71:703–709. 1983.PubMed/NCBI
17	McMichael AJ and Potter JD: Reproduction, endogenous and exogenous sex hormones, and colon cancer: A review and hypothesis. J Natl Cancer Inst. 65:1201–1207. 1980.PubMed/NCBI
18	Young JL Jr, Asire AJ and Polalack ES: SEER Program: Cancer incidence and mortality in the United States: 1973–1976. US Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, NCI. 671978.
19	Burbank F: Patterns in cancer mortality in the United States: 1950–1967. Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 71:1–594. 1971.PubMed/NCBI
20	Haenszel W and Correa P: Cancer of the colon and rectum and adenomatous polyps. A review of epidemiologic findings. Cancer. 28:14–24. 1971. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
21	Howell MA: The association between colorectal cancer and breast cancer. J Chronic Dis. 29:243–261. 1976. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
22	Izbicki JR, Wambach G, Hamilton SR, Harnisch E, Hogenschurz R, Izbicki W and Kusche J: Androgen receptors in experimentally induced colon carcinogenesis. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 112:39–46. 1986. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
23	Nikolouzakis TK, Stivaktakis PD, Apalaki P, Kalliantasi K, Sapsakos TM, Spandidos DA, Tsatsakis A, Souglakos J and Tsiaoussis J: Effect of systemic treatment on the micronuclei frequency in the peripheral blood of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Oncol Lett. 17:2703–2712. 2019.PubMed/NCBI
24	Qiu S, Jiang C and Zhou L: Physical activity and mortality in patients with colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Eur J Cancer Prev. April 5–2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
25	Gabrielsen JS, Najari BB, Alukal JP and Eisenberg ML: Trends in Testosterone Prescription and Public Health Concerns. Urol Clin North Am. 43:261–271. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
26	Georgiadis N, Tsarouhas K, Tsitsimpikou C, Vardavas A, Rezaee R, Germanakis I, Tsatsakis A, Stagos D and Kouretas D: Pesticides and cardiotoxicity. Where do we stand? Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 353:1–14. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
27	Margina D, Nițulescu G, Ungurianu A, Mesnage R, Goumenou M, Sarigiannis DA, Aschner M, Spandidos DA, Renieri EA, Hernández AF and Tsatsakis A: Overview of the effects of chemical mixtures with endocrine disrupting activity in the context of real life risk simulation (RLRS): an integrative approach (Review). World Acad Sci J (In press).
28	Veremchuk LV, Tsarouhas K, Vitkina TI, Mineeva EE, Gvozdenko TA, Antonyuk MV, Rakitskii VN, Sidletskaya KA, Tsatsakis AM and Golokhvast KS: Impact evaluation of environmental factors on respiratory function of asthma patients living in urban territory. Environ Pollut. 235:489–496. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
29	Zafiropoulos A, Tsarouhas K, Tsitsimpikou C, Fragkiadaki P, Germanakis I, Tsardi M, Maravgakis G, Goutzourelas N, Vasilaki F, Kouretas D, et al: Cardiotoxicity in rabbits after a low-level exposure to diazinon, propoxur, and chlorpyrifos. Hum Exp Toxicol. 33:1241–1252. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
30	Tsatsakis A, Docea AO, Constantin C, Calina D, Zlatian O, Nikolouzakis TK, Stivaktakis PD, Kalogeraki A, Liesivuori J, Tzanakakis G, et al: Genotoxic, cytotoxic, and cytopathological effects in rats exposed for 18 months to a mixture of 13 chemicals in doses below NOAEL levels. Toxicol Lett. Sep 12–2019.(Epub ahead of print). View Article : Google Scholar :
31	Ozcagli E, Kara M, Kotil T, Fragkiadaki P, Tzatzarakis MN, Tsitsimpikou C, Stivaktakis PD, Tsoukalas D, Spandidos DA, Tsatsakis AM, et al: Stanozolol administration combined with exercise leads to decreased telomerase activity possibly associated with liver aging. Int J Mol Med. 42:405–413. 2018.PubMed/NCBI
32	Kadıoğlu E, Taçoy G, Özçağlı E, Okyay K, Akboğa MK, Çengel A and Şardaş S: The role of oxidative DNA damage and GSTM1, GSTT1, and hOGG1 gene polymorphisms in coronary artery disease risk. Anatol J Cardiol. 16:931–938. 2016.PubMed/NCBI
33	McClendon JE, Appleby D, Claudon DB, Donegan WL and DeCosse JJ: Colonic neoplasms: Tissue estrogen receptor and carcinoembryonic antigen. Arch Surg. 112:240–241. 1977. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
34	Alford TC, Do HM, Geelhoed GW, Tsangaris NT and Lippman ME: Steroid hormone receptors in human colon cancers. Cancer. 43:980–984. 1979. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
35	Sica V, Contieri E, Nola E, Bova R, Papaleo G and Puca GA: Estrogen and progesterone binding proteins in human colorectal cancer. A preliminary characterization of estradiol receptor. Tumori. 67:307–314. 1981. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
36	Odagiri E, Jibiki K, Demura R, Shinozaki H, Nakamura S, Demura H and Suzuki H: Steroid receptors and the distribution of IR-carcinoembryonic antigen in colonic cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 27:787–791. 1984. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
37	Jacobson HL: Present status of steroid hormone receptor in large bowel cancer. Prog Cancer Res Ther. 29:3671984.
38	Izbicki JR, Schmitz R, Hoppen HO, Izbicki W and Troidl H: Effects of steroid hormone therapy on primarily xenotransplanted human colorectal adenocarcinomas. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 108:345–350. 1984. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
39	Wobbes T, Beex LVAM and Koenders AMJ: Estrogen and progestin receptors in colonic cancer? Dis Colon Rectum. 27:591–592. 1984. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
40	Bucci L, Salfi R, Meraviglia F and Delric G: Hormonal receptors in colorectal cancers (abstract). Second European Conference on Clinical Oncology and Cancer Nursing. 8:41–98. 1983.
41	Handelsman DJ: Androgen Physiology, Pharmacology and AbuseEndotext [Internet]. Feingold KR, Anawalt B, Boyce A, et al: MDText.com, Inc.; South Dartmouth, MA: 2000
42	Hiort O, Holterhus PM and Nitsche EM: Physiology and pathophysiology of androgen action. Baillieres Clin Endocrinol Metab. 12:115–132. 1998. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
43	Guyton AC and Hall JE: Textbook of medical physiology11th. Elsevier Saunders; Philladelphia, PA: 2006
44	Brenu EW, McNaughton L and Marshall-Gradisnik SM: Is there a potential immune dysfunction with anabolic androgenic steroid use?: A review. Mini Rev Med Chem. 11:438–445. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
45	Tsarouhas K, Kioukia-Fougia N, Papalexis P, Tsatsakis A, Kouretas D, Bacopoulou F and Tsitsimpikou C: Use of nutritional supplements contaminated with banned doping substances by recreational adolescent athletes in Athens, Greece. Food Chem Toxicol. 115:447–450. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
46	Tsitsimpikou C, Chrisostomou N, Papalexis P, Tsarouhas K, Tsatsakis A and Jamurtas A: The use of nutritional supplements among recreational athletes in Athens, Greece. Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab. 21:377–384. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
47	Vasilaki F, Tsitsimpikou C, Tsarouhas K, Germanakis I, Tzardi M, Kavvalakis M, Ozcagli E, Kouretas D and Tsatsakis AM: Cardiotoxicity in rabbits after long-term nandrolone decanoate administration. Toxicol Lett. 241:143–151. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
48	Baggish AL, Weiner RB, Kanayama G, Hudson JI, Picard MH, Hutter AM Jr and Pope HG Jr: Long-term anabolic-androgenic steroid use is associated with left ventricular dysfunction. Circ Heart Fail. 3:472–476. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
49	Tsitsimpikou C, Tsarouhas K, Spandidos DA and Tsatsakis AM: Detection of stanozolol in the urine of athletes at a pg level: The possibility of passive exposure. Biomed Rep. 5:665–666. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
50	Sattler FR, Jaque SV, Schroeder ET, Olson C, Dube MP, Martinez C, Briggs W, Horton R and Azen S: Effects of pharmacological doses of nandrolone decanoate and progressive resistance training in immunodeficient patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 84:1268–1276. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
51	Santos MA, Oliveira CV and Silva AS: Adverse cardiovascular effects from the use of anabolic-androgenic steroids as ergogenic resources. Subst Use Misuse. 49:1132–1137. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
52	Bonetti A, Tirelli F, Catapano A, Dazzi D, Dei Cas A, Solito F, Ceda G, Reverberi C, Monica C, Pipitone S, et al: Side effects of anabolic androgenic steroids abuse. Int J Sports Med. 29:679–687. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
53	Gould DC and Petty R: The male menopause: does it exist? For: Some men need investigation and testosterone treatment. West J Med. 173:76–78. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
54	Gillessen S, Templeton A, Marra G, Kuo YF, Valtorta E and Shahinian VB: Risk of colorectal cancer in men on long-term androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 102:1760–1770. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
55	Izbicki JR, Schmitz R, Kamran D and Izbicki W: Androgens as promoters of colon carcinogenesis. Cancer Detect Prev. 6:355–362. 1983.PubMed/NCBI
56	Mehta RG, Fricks CM and Moon RC: Androgen receptors in chemically-induced colon carcinogenesis. Cancer. 45 (Suppl):1085–1089. 1980. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
57	Moon RC and Fricks CM: Influence of gonadal hormones and age on 1,2-dimethylhydrazine-induced colon carcinogenesis. Cancer. 40 (Suppl):2502–2508. 1977. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
58	Hyde Z, Flicker L, McCaul KA, Almeida OP, Hankey GJ, Chubb SA and Yeap BB: Associations between testosterone levels and incident prostate, lung, and colorectal cancer. A population-based study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 21:1319–1329. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
59	Orsted DD, Nordestgaard BG and Bojesen SE: Plasma testosterone in the general population, cancer prognosis and cancer risk: A prospective cohort study. Ann Oncol. 25:712–718. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
60	Koliarakis I, Psaroulaki A, Nikolouzakis TK, Kokkinakis M, Sgantzos MN, Goulielmos G, Androutsopoulos VP, Tsatsakis A and Tsiaoussis J: Intestinal microbiota and colorectal cancer: a new aspect of research. J BUON. 23:1216–1234. 2018.PubMed/NCBI
61	Alberg AJ, Gordon GB, Hoffman SC, Comstock GW and Helzlsouer KJ: Serum dehydroepiandrosterone and dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate and the subsequent risk of developing colon cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 9:517–521. 2000.PubMed/NCBI
62	Anagnostopoulou V, Pediaditakis I, Alkahtani S, Alarifi SA, Schmidt EM, Lang F, Gravanis A, Charalampopoulos I and Stournaras C: Differential effects of dehydroepiandrosterone and testosterone in prostate and colon cancer cell apoptosis: The role of nerve growth factor (NGF) receptors. Endocrinology. 154:2446–2456. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
63	Ferro P, Catalano MG, Raineri M, Reato G, dell'Eva R, Risio M, Foà R, Fortunati N and Pfeffer U: Somatic alterations of the androgen receptor CAG repeat in human colon cancer delineate a novel mutation pathway independent of microsatellite instability. Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 123:35–40. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
64	Slattery ML, Sweeney C, Murtaugh M, Ma KN, Wolff RK, Potter JD, Caan BJ and Samowitz W: Associations between ERalpha, ERbeta, and AR genotypes and colon and rectal cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 14:2936–2942. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
65	Hoque A, Albanes D, Lippman SM, Spitz MR, Taylor PR, Klein EA, Thompson IM, Goodman P, Stanford JL, Crowley JJ, et al: Molecular epidemiologic studies within the Selenium and Vitamin E Cancer Prevention Trial (SELECT). Cancer Causes Control. 12:627–633. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
66	Krithivas K, Yurgalevitch SM, Mohr BA, Wilcox CJ, Batter SJ, Brown M, Longcope C, McKinlay JB and Kantoff PW: Evidence that the CAG repeat in the androgen receptor gene is associated with the age-related decline in serum androgen levels in men. J Endocrinol. 162:137–142. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
67	Ding D, Xu L, Menon M, Reddy GP and Barrack ER: Effect of a short CAG (glutamine) repeat on human androgen receptor function. Prostate. 58:23–32. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
68	Westberg L, Baghaei F, Rosmond R, Hellstrand M, Landén M, Jansson M, Holm G, Björntorp P and Eriksson E: Polymorphisms of the androgen receptor gene and the estrogen receptor beta gene are associated with androgen levels in women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 86:2562–2568. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
69	Rudolph A, Shi H, Försti A, Hoffmeister M, Sainz J, Jansen L, Hemminki K, Brenner H and Chang-Claude J: Repeat polymorphisms in ESR2 and AR and colorectal cancer risk and prognosis: Results from a German population-based case-control study. BMC Cancer. 14:8172014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
70	Bonin A, Bellemain E, Bronken Eidesen P, Pompanon F, Brochmann C and Taberlet P: How to track and assess genotyping errors in population genetics studies. Mol Ecol. 13:3261–3273. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
71	Pompanon F, Bonin A, Bellemain E and Taberlet P: Genotyping errors: Causes, consequences and solutions. Nat Rev Genet. 6:847–859. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
72	Huang R, Wang G, Song Y, Wang F, Zhu B, Tang Q, Liu Z, Chen Y, Zhang Q, Muhammad S, et al: Polymorphic CAG Repeat and Protein Expression of Androgen Receptor Gene in Colorectal Cancer. Mol Cancer Ther. 14:1066–1074. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
73	Chamberlain NL, Driver ED and Miesfeld RL: The length and location of CAG trinucleotide repeats in the androgen receptor N-terminal domain affect transactivation function. Nucleic Acids Res. 22:3181–3186. 1994. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
74	Choong CS, Kemppainen JA, Zhou ZX and Wilson EM: Reduced androgen receptor gene expression with first exon CAG repeat expansion. Mol Endocrinol. 10:1527–1535. 1996. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
75	Ferro P, Catalano MG, Dell'Eva R, Fortunati N and Pfeffer U: The androgen receptor CAG repeat: A modifier of carcinogenesis? Mol Cell Endocrinol. 193:109–120. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
76	Catalano MG, Pfeffer U, Raineri M, Ferro P, Curto A, Capuzzi P, Corno F, Berta L and Fortunati N: Altered expression of androgen-receptor isoforms in human colon-cancer tissues. Int J Cancer. 86:325–330. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
77	Gu S, Papadopoulou N, Nasir O, Föller M, Alevizopoulos K, Lang F and Stournaras C: Activation of membrane androgen receptors in colon cancer inhibits the prosurvival signals Akt/bad in vitro and in vivo and blocks migration via vinculin/actin signaling. Mol Med. 17:48–58. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
78	Gu S, Papadopoulou N, Gehring EM, Nasir O, Dimas K, Bhavsar SK, Föller M, Alevizopoulos K, Lang F and Stournaras C: Functional membrane androgen receptors in colon tumors trigger pro-apoptotic responses in vitro and reduce drastically tumor incidence in vivo. Mol Cancer. 8:1142009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
79	Chesire DR and Isaacs WB: Ligand-dependent inhibition of beta-catenin/TCF signaling by androgen receptor. Oncogene. 21:8453–8469. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
80	Yoshioka T, Nishikawa Y, Ito R, Kawamata M, Doi Y, Yamamoto Y, Yoshida M, Omori Y, Kotanagi H, Masuko T, et al: Significance of integrin αvβ5 and erbB3 in enhanced cell migration and liver metastasis of colon carcinomas stimulated by hepatocyte-derived heregulin. Cancer Sci. 101:2011–2018. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
81	Holgren C, Dougherty U, Edwin F, Cerasi D, Taylor I, Fichera A, Joseph L, Bissonnette M and Khare S: Sprouty-2 controls c-Met expression and metastatic potential of colon cancer cells: Sprouty/c-Met upregulation in human colonic adenocarcinomas. Oncogene. 29:5241–5253. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
82	Huynh N, Liu KH, Baldwin GS and He H: P21-activated kinase 1 stimulates colon cancer cell growth and migration/invasion via ERK- and AKT-dependent pathways. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1803:1106–1113. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
83	Teyssier C, Ou CY, Khetchoumian K, Losson R and Stallcup MR: Transcriptional intermediary factor 1alpha mediates physical interaction and functional synergy between the coactivator-associated arginine methyltransferase 1 and glucocorticoid receptor-interacting protein 1 nuclear receptor coactivators. Mol Endocrinol. 20:1276–1286. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
84	Chen D, Ma H, Hong H, Koh SS, Huang SM, Schurter BT, Aswad DW and Stallcup MR: Regulation of transcription by a protein methyltransferase. Science. 284:2174–2177. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
85	Koh SS, Li H, Lee YH, Widelitz RB, Chuong CM and Stallcup MR: Synergistic coactivator function by coactivator-associated arginine methyltransferase (CARM) 1 and beta-catenin with two different classes of DNA-binding transcriptional activators. J Biol Chem. 277:26031–26035. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
86	El Messaoudi S, Fabbrizio E, Rodriguez C, Chuchana P, Fauquier L, Cheng D, Theillet C, Vandel L, Bedford MT and Sardet C: Coactivator-associated arginine methyltransferase 1 (CARM1) is a positive regulator of the Cyclin E1 gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 103:13351–13356. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
87	Kim YR, Lee BK, Park RY, Nguyen NT, Bae JA, Kwon DD and Jung C: Differential CARM1 expression in prostate and colorectal cancers. BMC Cancer. 10:1972010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
88	Ilboudo S, Fouche E, Rizzati V, Toé AM, Gamet-Payrastre L and Guissou PI: In vitro impact of five pesticides alone or in combination on human intestinal cell line Caco-2. Toxicol Rep. 1:474–489. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
89	Carroll RE, Goodlad RA, Poole AJ, Tyner AL, Robey RB, Swanson SM and Unterman TG: Reduced susceptibility to azoxymethane-induced aberrant crypt foci formation and colon cancer in growth hormone deficient rats. Growth Horm IGF Res. 19:447–456. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
90	Chuang KH, Altuwaijri S, Li G, Lai JJ, Chu CY, Lai KP, Lin HY, Hsu JW, Keng P, Wu MC, et al: Neutropenia with impaired host defense against microbial infection in mice lacking androgen receptor. J Exp Med. 206:1181–1199. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
91	Mårin P, Krotkiewski M and Björntorp P: Androgen treatment of middle-aged, obese men: Effects on metabolism, muscle and adipose tissues. Eur J Med. 1:329–336. 1992.PubMed/NCBI
92	Lin JH and Giovannucci E: Sex hormones and colorectal cancer: What have we learned so far? J Natl Cancer Inst. 102:1746–1747. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
93	Thevis M and Schänzer W: Synthetic anabolic agents: Steroids and nonsteroidal selective androgen receptor modulatorsDoping in Sports: Biochemical Principles, Effects and Analysis. Handbook of Experimental Pharmacology. Thieme D and Hemmersbach P: 195. Springer; Berlin, Heidelberg: pp. 99–126. 2010, View Article : Google Scholar
94	Joseph JF and Parr MK: Synthetic androgens as designer supplements. Curr Neuropharmacol. 13:89–100. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
95	Watanabe S and Kobayashi Y: Exogenous hormones and human cancer. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 23:1–13. 1993.PubMed/NCBI
96	Rosner F and Khan MT: Renal cell carcinoma following prolonged testosterone therapy. Arch Intern Med. 152:426–429. 1992. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
97	Martorana G, Concetti S, Manferrari F and Creti S: Anabolic steroid abuse and renal cell carcinoma. J Urol. 162:2089. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
98	Bryden AAG, Rothwell PJN and O'Reilly PH: Anabolic steroid abuse and renal-cell carcinoma. Lancet. 346:1306–1307. 1995. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
99	Zahm SH and Fraumeni JF Jr: The epidemiology of soft tissue sarcoma. Semin Oncol. 24:504–514. 1997.PubMed/NCBI
100	Nourbakhsh M, Golestani A, Zahrai M, Modarressi MH, Malekpour Z and Karami-Tehrani F: Androgens stimulate telomerase expression, activity and phosphorylation in ovarian adenocarcinoma cells. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 330:10–16. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
101	McKeown-Eyssen G: Epidemiology of colorectal cancer revisited: Are serum triglycerides and/or plasma glucose associated with risk? Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 3:687–695. 1994.PubMed/NCBI
102	Bronson FH and Matherne CM: Exposure to anabolic-androgenic steroids shortens life span of male mice. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 29:615–619. 1997. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
103	Froehner M, Fischer R, Leike S, Hakenberg OW, Noack B and Wirth MP: Intratesticular leiomyosarcoma in a young man after high dose doping with oral-turinabol: A case report. Cancer. 86:1571–1575. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
104	Chacon A and Monga M: Medical management of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Geriatr Nephrol Urol. 9:39–48. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
105	Dimitriadis G, Mitrou P, Lambadiari V, Maratou E and Raptis SA: Insulin effects in muscle and adipose tissue. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 93 (Suppl 1):S52–S59. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
106	Giovannucci E and Michaud D: The role of obesity and related metabolic disturbances in cancers of the colon, prostate, and pancreas. Gastroenterology. 132:2208–2225. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
107	Yang YX, Hennessy S and Lewis JD: Insulin therapy and colorectal cancer risk among type 2 diabetes mellitus patients. Gastroenterology. 127:1044–1050. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
108	Larsson SC, Orsini N, Brismar K and Wolk A: Diabetes mellitus and risk of bladder cancer: A meta-analysis. Diabetologia. 49:2819–2823. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
109	Flood A, Mai V, Pfeiffer R, Kahle L, Remaley AT, Lanza E and Schatzkin A: Elevated serum concentrations of insulin and glucose increase risk of recurrent colorectal adenomas. Gastroenterology. 133:1423–1429. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
110	Polednak AP: Comorbid diabetes mellitus and risk of death after diagnosis of colorectal cancer: A population-based study. Cancer Detect Prev. 30:466–472. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
111	Jullumstrø E, Kollind M, Lydersen S and Edna TH: Diabetes mellitus and outcomes of colorectal cancer. Acta Oncol. 48:361–367. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
112	Schoen RE, Weissfeld JL, Kuller LH, Thaete FL, Evans RW, Hayes RB and Rosen CJ: Insulin-like growth factor-I and insulin are associated with the presence and advancement of adenomatous polyps. Gastroenterology. 129:464–475. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
113	LeRoith D, Baserga R, Helman L and Roberts CT Jr: Insulin-like growth factors and cancer. Ann Intern Med. 122:54–59. 1995. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
114	Sandhu MS, Dunger DB and Giovannucci EL: Insulin, insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I), IGF binding proteins, their biologic interactions, and colorectal cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 94:972–980. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
115	Siddle K: Signalling by insulin and IGF receptors: Supporting acts and new players. J Mol Endocrinol. 47:R1–R10. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
116	Mosthaf L, Grako K, Dull TJ, Coussens L, Ullrich A and McClain DA: Functionally distinct insulin receptors generated by tissue-specific alternative splicing. EMBO J. 9:2409–2413. 1990. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
117	Abbruzzese C, Diodoro MG, Sperduti I, Mileo AM, Pattaro G, De Salvo L, Cosimelli M, Perrotti N and Paggi MG: Detection of phosphorylated insulin receptor in colorectal adenoma and adenocarcinoma: Implications for prognosis and clinical outcome. J Cell Physiol. 230:562–567. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
118	Frasca F, Pandini G, Scalia P, Sciacca L, Mineo R, Costantino A, Goldfine ID, Belfiore A and Vigneri R: Insulin receptor isoform A, a newly recognized, high-affinity insulin-like growth factor II receptor in fetal and cancer cells. Mol Cell Biol. 19:3278–3288. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
119	Kosaki A and Webster NJ: Effect of dexamethasone on the alternative splicing of the insulin receptor mRNA and insulin action in HepG2 hepatoma cells. J Biol Chem. 268:21990–21996. 1993.PubMed/NCBI
120	Heckl SM, Pellinghaus M, Krüger S, Bosselmann C, Wilhelm F, Behrens HM, Schreiber S and Röcken C: Epithelial insulin receptor expression-prognostic relevance in colorectal cancer. Oncotarget. 9:37497–37508. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
121	Morcavallo A, Genua M, Palummo A, Kletvikova E, Jiracek J, Brzozowski AM, Iozzo RV, Belfiore A and Morrione A: Insulin and insulin-like growth factor II differentially regulate endocytic sorting and stability of insulin receptor isoform A. J Biol Chem. 287:11422–11436. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
122	Wang X, Häring MF, Rathjen T, Lockhart SM, Sørensen D, Ussar S, Rasmussen LM, Bertagnolli MM, Kahn CR and Rask-Madsen C: Insulin resistance in vascular endothelial cells promotes intestinal tumour formation. Oncogene. 36:4987–4996. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
123	Laakso M, Edelman SV, Brechtel G and Baron AD: Impaired insulin-mediated skeletal muscle blood flow in patients with NIDDM. Diabetes. 41:1076–1083. 1992. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
124	Steinberg HO, Chaker H, Leaming R, Johnson A, Brechtel G and Baron AD: Obesity/insulin resistance is associated with endothelial dysfunction. Implications for the syndrome of insulin resistance. J Clin Invest. 97:2601–2610. 1996. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
125	Rask-Madsen C, Ihlemann N, Krarup T, Christiansen E, Kober L, Nervil Kistorp C and Torp-Pedersen C: Insulin therapy improves insulin-stimulated endothelial function in patients with type 2 diabetes and ischemic heart disease. Diabetes. 50:2611–2618. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
126	Tabit CE, Shenouda SM, Holbrook M, Fetterman JL, Kiani S, Frame AA, Kluge MA, Held A, Dohadwala MM, Gokce N, et al: Protein kinase C-β contributes to impaired endothelial insulin signaling in humans with diabetes mellitus. Circulation. 127:86–95. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
127	Simpson RJ, Lim JW, Moritz RL and Mathivanan S: Exosomes: Proteomic insights and diagnostic potential. Expert Rev Proteomics. 6:267–283. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
128	Gangoda L and Mathivanan S: Cortactin enhances exosome secretion without altering cargo. J Cell Biol. 214:129–131. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
129	Gangoda L, Boukouris S, Liem M, Kalra H and Mathivanan S: Extracellular vesicles including exosomes are mediators of signal transduction: Are they protective or pathogenic? Proteomics. 15:260–271. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
130	Silantyev AS, Falzone L, Libra M, Gurina OI, Kardashova KS, Nikolouzakis TK, Nosyrev AE, Sutton CW, Mitsias PD and Tsatsakis A: Current and Future Trends on Diagnosis and Prognosis of Glioblastoma: From Molecular Biology to Proteomics. Cells. 8:82019. View Article : Google Scholar
131	Taniguchi CM, Emanuelli B and Kahn CR: Critical nodes in signalling pathways: Insights into insulin action. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 7:85–96. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
132	Huang XF and Chen JZ: Obesity, the PI3K/Akt signal pathway and colon cancer. Obes Rev. 10:610–616. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
133	Matsuzaki H, Daitoku H, Hatta M, Tanaka K and Fukamizu A: Insulin-induced phosphorylation of FKHR (Foxo1) targets to proteasomal degradation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 100:11285–11290. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
134	Liem M, Ang CS and Mathivanan S: Insulin Mediated Activation of PI3K/Akt Signalling Pathway Modifies the Proteomic Cargo of Extracellular Vesicles. Proteomics. 17:172017. View Article : Google Scholar
135	Baserga R: The insulin-like growth factor I receptor: A key to tumor growth? Cancer Res. 55:249–252. 1995.PubMed/NCBI
136	Párrizas M and LeRoith D: Insulin-like growth factor-1 inhibition of apoptosis is associated with increased expression of the bcl-xL gene product. Endocrinology. 138:1355–1358. 1997. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
137	Wang L, Ma W, Markovich R, Lee WL and Wang PH: Insulin-like growth factor I modulates induction of apoptotic signaling in H9C2 cardiac muscle cells. Endocrinology. 139:1354–1360. 1998. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
138	Remacle-Bonnet MM, Garrouste FL, Heller S, André F, Marvaldi JL and Pommier GJ: Insulin-like growth factor-I protects colon cancer cells from death factor-induced apoptosis by potentiating tumor necrosis factor alpha-induced mitogen-activated protein kinase and nuclear factor kappaB signaling pathways. Cancer Res. 60:2007–2017. 2000.PubMed/NCBI
139	Liu B, Fang M, Lu Y, Mendelsohn J and Fan Z: Fibroblast growth factor and insulin-like growth factor differentially modulate the apoptosis and G1 arrest induced by anti-epidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibody. Oncogene. 20:1913–1922. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
140	Ryan PD and Goss PE: The emerging role of the insulin-like growth factor pathway as a therapeutic target in cancer. Oncologist. 13:16–24. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
141	Pollak M: The insulin and insulin-like growth factor receptor family in neoplasia: An update. Nat Rev Cancer. 12:159–169. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
142	Islam MA, Hooiveld GJEJ, van den Berg JHJ, van der Velpen V, Murk AJ, Rietjens IMCM and van Leeuwen FXR: Soy supplementation: Impact on gene expression in different tissues of ovariectomized rats and evaluation of the rat model to predict (post)menopausal health effect. Toxicol Rep. 5:1087–1097. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
143	Ma J, Pollak MN, Giovannucci E, Chan JM, Tao Y, Hennekens CH and Stampfer MJ: Prospective study of colorectal cancer risk in men and plasma levels of insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I and IGF-binding protein-3. J Natl Cancer Inst. 91:620–625. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
144	Lahm H, Suardet L, Laurent PL, Fischer JR, Ceyhan A, Givel JC and Odartchenko N: Growth regulation and co-stimulation of human colorectal cancer cell lines by insulin-like growth factor I, II and transforming growth factor alpha. Br J Cancer. 65:341–346. 1992. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
145	Guo YS, Narayan S, Yallampalli C and Singh P: Characterization of insulinlike growth factor I receptors in human colon cancer. Gastroenterology. 102:1101–1108. 1992. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
146	Freier S, Weiss O, Eran M, Flyvbjerg A, Dahan R, Nephesh I, Safra T, Shiloni E and Raz I: Expression of the insulin-like growth factors and their receptors in adenocarcinoma of the colon. Gut. 44:704–708. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
147	Hakam A, Yeatman TJ, Lu L, Mora L, Marcet G, Nicosia SV, Karl RC and Coppola D: Expression of insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor in human colorectal cancer. Hum Pathol. 30:1128–1133. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
148	Lee J, Jain A, Kim P, Lee T, Kuller A, Princen F, In-GuDo, Kim SH, Park JO, Park YS, et al: Activated cMET and IGF1R-driven PI3K signaling predicts poor survival in colorectal cancers independent of KRAS mutational status. PLoS One. 9:e1035512014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
149	Soubry A, Il'yasova D, Sedjo R, Wang F, Byers T, Rosen C, Yashin A, Ukraintseva S, Haffner S and D'Agostino R Jr: Increase in circulating levels of IGF-1 and IGF-1/IGFBP-3 molar ratio over a decade is associated with colorectal adenomatous polyps. Int J Cancer. 131:512–517. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
150	Ollberding NJ, Cheng I, Wilkens LR, Henderson BE, Pollak MN, Kolonel LN and Le Marchand L: Genetic variants, prediagnostic circulating levels of insulin-like growth factors, insulin, and glucose and the risk of colorectal cancer: The Multiethnic Cohort study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 21:810–820. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
151	Giovannucci E: Insulin, insulin-like growth factors and colon cancer: A review of the evidence. J Nutr. 131 (Suppl):3109S–3120S. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
152	Shiratsuchi I, Akagi Y, Kawahara A, Kinugasa T, Romeo K, Yoshida T, Ryu Y, Gotanda Y, Kage M and Shirouzu K: Expression of IGF-1 and IGF-1R and their relation to clinicopathological factors in colorectal cancer. Anticancer Res. 31:2541–2545. 2011.PubMed/NCBI
153	Peters G, Gongoll S, Langner C, Mengel M, Piso P, Klempnauer J, Rüschoff J, Kreipe H and von Wasielewski R: IGF-1R, IGF-1 and IGF-2 expression as potential prognostic and predictive markers in colorectal-cancer. Virchows Arch. 443:139–145. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
154	Furlanetto RW, Harwell SE and Frick KK: Insulin-like growth factor-I induces cyclin-D1 expression in MG63 human osteosarcoma cells in vitro. Mol Endocrinol. 8:510–517. 1994. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
155	Sahin AA, Ro JY, Brown RW, Ordonez NG, Cleary KR, el-Naggar AK, Wilson P and Ayala AG: Assessment of Ki-67-derived tumor proliferative activity in colorectal adenocarcinomas. Mod Pathol. 7:17–22. 1994.PubMed/NCBI
156	Kubota Y, Petras RE, Easley KA, Bauer TW, Tubbs RR and Fazio VW: Ki-67-determined growth fraction versus standard staging and grading parameters in colorectal carcinoma. A multivariate analysis. Cancer. 70:2602–2609. 1992. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
157	Cascinu S, Del Ferro E, Grianti C, Ligi M, Ghiselli R, Foglietti G, Saba V, Lungarotti F and Catalano G: Inhibition of tumor cell kinetics and serum insulin growth factor I levels by octreotide in colorectal cancer patients. Gastroenterology. 113:767–772. 1997. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
158	Bowers LW, Rossi EL, O'Flanagan CH, deGraffenried LA and Hursting SD: The Role of the Insulin/IGF System in Cancer: Lessons Learned from Clinical Trials and the Energy Balance-Cancer Link. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 6:772015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
159	Firth SM and Baxter RC: Cellular actions of the insulin-like growth factor binding proteins. Endocr Rev. 23:824–854. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
160	Liou JM, Shun CT, Liang JT, Chiu HM, Chen MJ, Chen CC, Wang HP, Wu MS and Lin JT: Plasma insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-2 levels as diagnostic and prognostic biomarker of colorectal cancer. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 95:1717–1725. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
161	Jones JI and Clemmons DR: Insulin-like growth factors and their binding proteins: Biological actions. Endocr Rev. 16:3–34. 1995. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
162	Héron-Milhavet L and LeRoith D: Insulin-like growth factor I induces MDM2-dependent degradation of p53 via the p38 MAPK pathway in response to DNA damage. J Biol Chem. 277:15600–15606. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
163	Peretz S, Jensen R, Baserga R and Glazer PM: ATM-dependent expression of the insulin-like growth factor-I receptor in a pathway regulating radiation response. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 98:1676–1681. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
164	Huang F, Xu LA and Khambata-Ford S: Correlation between gene expression of IGF-1R pathway markers and cetuximab benefit in metastatic colorectal cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 18:1156–1166. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
165	Jones HE, Goddard L, Gee JM, Hiscox S, Rubini M, Barrow D, Knowlden JM, Williams S, Wakeling AE and Nicholson RI: Insulin-like growth factor-I receptor signalling and acquired resistance to gefitinib (ZD1839; Iressa) in human breast and prostate cancer cells. Endocr Relat Cancer. 11:793–814. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
166	Albanell J and Baselga J: Unraveling resistance to trastuzumab (Herceptin): Insulin-like growth factor-I receptor, a new suspect. J Natl Cancer Inst. 93:1830–1832. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
167	Shen K, Cui D, Sun L, Lu Y, Han M and Liu J: Inhibition of IGF-IR increases chemosensitivity in human colorectal cancer cells through MRP-2 promoter suppression. J Cell Biochem. 113:2086–2097. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
168	Warren RS, Yuan H, Matli MR, Ferrara N and Donner DB: Induction of vascular endothelial growth factor by insulin-like growth factor 1 in colorectal carcinoma. J Biol Chem. 271:29483–29488. 1996. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
169	Akagi Y, Liu W, Zebrowski B, Xie K and Ellis LM: Regulation of vascular endothelial growth factor expression in human colon cancer by insulin-like growth factor-I. Cancer Res. 58:4008–4014. 1998.PubMed/NCBI
170	Sekharam M, Zhao H, Sun M, Fang Q, Zhang Q, Yuan Z, Dan HC, Boulware D, Cheng JQ and Coppola D: Insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor enhances invasion and induces resistance to apoptosis of colon cancer cells through the Akt/Bcl-x(L) pathway. Cancer Res. 63:7708–7716. 2003.PubMed/NCBI
171	Zhang QY, Wang L, Song ZY and Qu XJ: Knockdown of type I insulin-like growth factor receptor inhibits human colorectal cancer cell growth and downstream PI3K/Akt, WNT/β-catenin signal pathways. Biomed Pharmacother. 73:12–18. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
172	Nahor I, Abramovitch S, Engeland K and Werner H: The p53-family members p63 and p73 inhibit insulin-like growth factor-I receptor gene expression in colon cancer cells. Growth Horm IGF Res. 15:388–396. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
173	Ramocki NM, Wilkins HR, Magness ST, Simmons JG, Scull BP, Lee GH, McNaughton KK and Lund PK: Insulin receptor substrate-1 deficiency promotes apoptosis in the putative intestinal crypt stem cell region, limits Apcmin/+ tumors, and regulates Sox9. Endocrinology. 149:261–267. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
174	Chan BT and Lee AV: Insulin receptor substrates (IRSs) and breast tumorigenesis. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia. 13:415–422. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
175	Esposito DL, Aru F, Lattanzio R, Morgano A, Abbondanza M, Malekzadeh R, Bishehsari F, Valanzano R, Russo A, Piantelli M, et al: The insulin receptor substrate 1 (IRS1) in intestinal epithelial differentiation and in colorectal cancer. PLoS One. 7:e361902012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
176	Day E, Poulogiannis G, McCaughan F, Mulholland S, Arends MJ, Ibrahim AE and Dear PH: IRS2 is a candidate driver oncogene on 13q34 in colorectal cancer. Int J Exp Pathol. 94:203–211. 2013.PubMed/NCBI
177	Slattery ML, Samowitz W, Curtin K, Ma KN, Hoffman M, Caan B and Neuhausen S: Associations among IRS1, IRS2, IGF1, and IGFBP3 genetic polymorphisms and colorectal cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 13:1206–1214. 2004.PubMed/NCBI
178	Sanchez-Lopez E, Flashner-Abramson E, Shalapour S, Zhong Z, Taniguchi K, Levitzki A and Karin M: Targeting colorectal cancer via its microenvironment by inhibiting IGF-1 receptor-insulin receptor substrate and STAT3 signaling. Oncogene. 35:2634–2644. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
179	Krajewski W, Dzięgała M, Kołodziej A, Dembowski J and Zdrojowy R: Vitamin D and urological cancers. Cent European J Urol. 69:139–147. 2016.PubMed/NCBI
180	Lefkowitz ES and Garland CF: Sunlight, vitamin D, and ovarian cancer mortality rates in US women. Int J Epidemiol. 23:1133–1136. 1994. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
181	Uitterlinden AG, Fang Y, Van Meurs JB, Pols HA and Van Leeuwen JP: Genetics and biology of vitamin D receptor polymorphisms. Gene. 338:143–156. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
182	Boscoe FP and Schymura MJ: Solar ultraviolet-B exposure and cancer incidence and mortality in the United States, 1993–2002. BMC Cancer. 6:2642006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
183	Bishop JE, Collins ED, Okamura WH and Norman AW: Profile of ligand specificity of the vitamin D binding protein for 1 alpha,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 and its analogs. J Bone Miner Res. 9:1277–1288. 1994. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
184	Bikle D: Vitamin D: Production, Metabolism, and Mechanisms of ActionEndotext [Internet]. Feingold KR, Anawalt B, Boyce A, et al: MDText.com, Inc.; South Dartmouth, MA: 2000
185	Feskanich D, Ma J, Fuchs CS, Kirkner GJ, Hankinson SE, Hollis BW and Giovannucci EL: Plasma vitamin D metabolites and risk of colorectal cancer in women. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 13:1502–1508. 2004.PubMed/NCBI
186	Braun MM, Helzlsouer KJ, Hollis BW and Comstock GW: Colon cancer and serum vitamin D metabolite levels 10–17 years prior to diagnosis. Am J Epidemiol. 142:608–611. 1995. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
187	Gorham ED, Garland CF, Garland FC, Grant WB, Mohr SB, Lipkin M, Newmark HL, Giovannucci E, Wei M and Holick MF: Vitamin D and prevention of colorectal cancer. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 97:179–194. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
188	Garland C, Shekelle RB, Barrett-Connor E, Criqui MH, Rossof AH and Paul O: Dietary vitamin D and calcium and risk of colorectal cancer: A 19-year prospective study in men. Lancet. 1:307–309. 1985. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
189	Garland CF and Garland FC: Do sunlight and vitamin D reduce the likelihood of colon cancer? Int J Epidemiol. 9:227–231. 1980. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
190	Belleli A, Shany S, Levy J, Guberman R and Lamprecht SA: A protective role of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 in chemically induced rat colon carcinogenesis. Carcinogenesis. 13:2293–2298. 1992. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
191	Comer PF, Clark TD and Glauert HP: Effect of dietary vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) on colon carcinogenesis induced by 1,2-dimethylhydrazine in male Fischer 344 rats. Nutr Cancer. 19:113–124. 1993. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
192	Thomas MG, Tebbutt S and Williamson RC: Vitamin D and its metabolites inhibit cell proliferation in human rectal mucosa and a colon cancer cell line. Gut. 33:1660–1663. 1992. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
193	Brehier A and Thomasset M: Human colon cell line HT-29: Characterisation of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 receptor and induction of differentiation by the hormone. J Steroid Biochem. 29:265–270. 1988. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
194	Cross HS, Farsoudi KH and Peterlik M: Growth inhibition of human colon adenocarcinoma-derived Caco-2 cells by 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 and two synthetic analogs: Relation to in vitro hypercalcemic potential. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 347:105–110. 1993. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
195	Vandewalle B, Adenis A, Hornez L, Revillion F and Lefebvre J: 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 receptors in normal and malignant human colorectal tissues. Cancer Lett. 86:67–73. 1994. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
196	Zhao X and Feldman D: Regulation of vitamin D receptor abundance and responsiveness during differentiation of HT-29 human colon cancer cells. Endocrinology. 132:1808–1814. 1993. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
197	Carlberg C and Dunlop TW: An integrated biological approach to nuclear receptor signaling in physiological control and disease. Crit Rev Eukaryot Gene Expr. 16:1–22. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
198	Padi SK, Zhang Q, Rustum YM, Morrison C and Guo B: MicroRNA-627 mediates the epigenetic mechanisms of vitamin D to suppress proliferation of human colorectal cancer cells and growth of xenograft tumors in mice. Gastroenterology. 145:437–446. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
199	Fernandez-Garcia NI, Palmer HG, Garcia M, Gonzalez-Martin A, del Rio M, Barettino D, Volpert O, Muñoz A and Jimenez B: 1alpha,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D3 regulates the expression of Id1 and Id2 genes and the angiogenic phenotype of human colon carcinoma cells. Oncogene. 24:6533–6544. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
200	Pendás-Franco N, Aguilera O, Pereira F, González-Sancho JM and Muñoz A: Vitamin D and Wnt/β-catenin pathway in colon cancer: Role and regulation of DICKKOPF genes. Anticancer Res 28 (5A). 2613–2623. 2008.
201	Ylikomi T, Laaksi I, Lou YR, Martikainen P, Miettinen S, Pennanen P, Purmonen S, Syvälä H, Vienonen A and Tuohimaa P: Antiproliferative action of vitamin D. Vitam Horm. 64:357–406. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
202	Taghizadeh F, Tang MJ and Tai IT: Synergism between vitamin D and secreted protein acidic and rich in cysteine-induced apoptosis and growth inhibition results in increased susceptibility of therapy-resistant colorectal cancer cells to chemotherapy. Mol Cancer Ther. 6:309–317. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
203	Pálmer HG, Sánchez-Carbayo M, Ordóñez-Morán P, Larriba MJ, Cordón-Cardó C and Muñoz A: Genetic signatures of differentiation induced by 1alpha,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 in human colon cancer cells. Cancer Res. 63:7799–7806. 2003.PubMed/NCBI
204	Jensen SS, Madsen MW, Lukas J, Binderup L and Bartek J: Inhibitory effects of 1alpha,25-dihydroxyvitamin D(3) on the G(1)-S phase-controlling machinery. Mol Endocrinol. 15:1370–1380. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
205	Scaglione-Sewell BA, Bissonnette M, Skarosi S, Abraham C and Brasitus TA: A vitamin D3 analog induces a G1-phase arrest in CaCo-2 cells by inhibiting cdk2 and cdk6: Roles of cyclin E, p21Waf1, and p27Kip1. Endocrinology. 141:3931–3939. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
206	Liu W, Chen Y, Golan MA, Annunziata ML, Du J, Dougherty U, Kong J, Musch M, Huang Y, Pekow J, et al: Intestinal epithelial vitamin D receptor signaling inhibits experimental colitis. J Clin Invest. 123:3983–3996. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
207	Murillo G, Nagpal V, Tiwari N, Benya RV and Mehta RG: Actions of vitamin D are mediated by the TLR4 pathway in inflammation-induced colon cancer. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 121:403–407. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
208	Kim KE and Brasitus TA: The role of vitamin D in normal and pathologic processes in the colon. Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 17:72–77. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
209	Revelli A, Massobrio M and Tesarik J: Nongenomic effects of 1α,25-dihydroxyvitamin D(3). Trends Endocrinol Metab. 9:419–427. 1998. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
210	Norman AW, Song X, Zanello L, Bula C and Okamura WH: Rapid and genomic biological responses are mediated by different shapes of the agonist steroid hormone, 1α,25(OH)2vitamin D3. Steroids. 64:120–128. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
211	Sitrin MD, Bissonnette M, Bolt MJ, Wali R, Khare S, Scaglione-Sewell B, Skarosi S and Brasitus TA: Rapid effects of 1,25(OH)2 vitamin D3 on signal transduction systems in colonic cells. Steroids. 64:137–142. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
212	Nelson WJ and Nusse R: Convergence of Wnt, beta-catenin, and cadherin pathways. Science. 303:1483–1487. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
213	Jeanes A, Gottardi CJ and Yap AS: Cadherins and cancer: How does cadherin dysfunction promote tumor progression? Oncogene. 27:6920–6929. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
214	Rozen F, Yang XF, Huynh H and Pollak M: Antiproliferative action of vitamin D-related compounds and insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 5 accumulation. J Natl Cancer Inst. 89:652–656. 1997. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
215	Kaler P, Augenlicht L and Klampfer L: Macrophage-derived IL-1beta stimulates Wnt signaling and growth of colon cancer cells: A crosstalk interrupted by vitamin D3. Oncogene. 28:3892–3902. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
216	Kaler P, Galea V, Augenlicht L and Klampfer L: Tumor associated macrophages protect colon cancer cells from TRAIL-induced apoptosis through IL-1beta-dependent stabilization of Snail in tumor cells. PLoS One. 5:e117002010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
217	Chen A, Davis BH, Sitrin MD, Brasitus TA and Bissonnette M: Transforming growth factor-beta 1 signaling contributes to Caco-2 cell growth inhibition induced by 1,25(OH)(2)D(3). Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 283:G864–G874. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
218	Yanagisawa J, Yanagi Y, Masuhiro Y, Suzawa M, Watanabe M, Kashiwagi K, Toriyabe T, Kawabata M, Miyazono K and Kato S: Convergence of transforming growth factor-beta and vitamin D signaling pathways on SMAD transcriptional coactivators. Science. 283:1317–1321. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
219	Deeb KK, Trump DL and Johnson CS: Vitamin D signalling pathways in cancer: Potential for anticancer therapeutics. Nat Rev Cancer. 7:684–700. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
220	Tong WM, Hofer H, Ellinger A, Peterlik M and Cross HS: Mechanism of antimitogenic action of vitamin D in human colon carcinoma cells: Relevance for suppression of epidermal growth factor-stimulated cell growth. Oncol Res. 11:77–84. 1999.PubMed/NCBI
221	Ben-Shoshan M, Amir S, Dang DT, Dang LH, Weisman Y and Mabjeesh NJ: 1alpha,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 (Calcitriol) inhibits hypoxia-inducible factor-1/vascular endothelial growth factor pathway in human cancer cells. Mol Cancer Ther. 6:1433–1439. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
222	Harris DM and Go VL: Vitamin D and colon carcinogenesis. J Nutr. 134 (Suppl):3463S–3471S. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
223	Lappe JM, Travers-Gustafson D, Davies KM, Recker RR and Heaney RP: Vitamin D and calcium supplementation reduces cancer risk: Results of a randomized trial. Am J Clin Nutr. 85:1586–1591. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
224	Binder G, Wittekindt N and Ranke MB: Noonan Syndrome: Genetics and Responsiveness to Growth Hormone Therapy. Horm Res Paediatr. 67:45–49. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar
225	Campbell GS: Growth-hormone signal transduction. J Pediatr. 131:S42–S44. 1997. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
226	Savage MO, Blum WF, Ranke MB, Postel-Vinay MC, Cotterill AM, Hall K, Chatelain PG, Preece MA and Rosenfeld RG: Clinical features and endocrine status in patients with growth hormone insensitivity (Laron syndrome). J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 77:1465–1471. 1993. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
227	Gunawardane K, Hansen TK, Muller N, Christiansen JS and Jorgensen JOL: Normal Physiology of Growth Hormone in AdultsEndotext [Internet]. Feingold KR, Anawalt B and Boyce A: MDText.com, Inc.; South Dartmouth, MA: 2000
228	Slater MD and Murphy CR: Co-expression of interleukin-6 and human growth hormone in apparently normal prostate biopsies that ultimately progress to prostate cancer using low pH, high temperature antigen retrieval. J Mol Histol. 37:37–41. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
229	Waters MJ and Conway-Campbell BL: The oncogenic potential of autocrine human growth hormone in breast cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 101:14992–14993. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
230	Brooks AJ and Waters MJ: The growth hormone receptor: Mechanism of activation and clinical implications. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 6:515–525. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
231	Brown-Borg HM and Bartke A: GH and IGF1: Roles in energy metabolism of long-living GH mutant mice. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 67:652–660. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
232	Chesnokova V, Zonis S, Zhou C, Recouvreux MV, Ben-Shlomo A, Araki T, Barrett R, Workman M, Wawrowsky K, Ljubimov VA, et al: Growth hormone is permissive for neoplastic colon growth. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 113:E3250–E3259. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
233	Morin PJ, Sparks AB, Korinek V, Barker N, Clevers H, Vogelstein B and Kinzler KW: Activation of beta-catenin-Tcf signaling in colon cancer by mutations in beta-catenin or APC. Science. 275:1787–1790. 1997. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
234	Clevers H and Nusse R: Wnt/β-catenin signaling and disease. Cell. 149:1192–1205. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
235	Koliarakis I, Messaritakis I, Nikolouzakis TK, Hamilos G, Souglakos J and Tsiaoussis J: Oral Bacteria and Intestinal Dysbiosis in Colorectal Cancer. Int J Mol Sci. 20:41462019. View Article : Google Scholar :

December-2019
Volume 42 Issue 6

Print ISSN: 1021-335X
Online ISSN:1791-2431

Recommend to Library

Journal Metrics
Impact Factor: 4.2
Ranked Oncology
(total number of cites)
CiteScore: 8.4
CiteScore Rank: Q1: #68/366 Oncology
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP): 0.786
SCImago Journal Rank (SJR): 0.812

Oncology
Reports