Open Access

Tetraspanin CD9: A friend or foe of head and neck cancer (Review)

  • Authors:
    • Suhasini P.C.
    • Shilpa S. Shetty
    • Suchetha Kumari Nalilu
    • Praveen Kumar Shetty
    • Prakash Patil
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: March 9, 2022     https://doi.org/10.3892/or.2022.8299
  • Article Number: 88
  • Copyright: © P.C. et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License.

Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

Head and neck cancers are diverse and complex diseases characterised by unregulated growth of tumour cells in various parts of the head and neck region, such as in the buccal mucosa, floor of the mouth, tongue, oropharynx, hypopharynx, oesophagus, nasopharynx and salivary glands. Partial or total glossectomy, radiation or chemotherapy greatly affect patient quality of life. However, even following treatment, patients may relapse. Nicotine‑derived nitrosamines and alcohol are the major etiological factors underlying this deadly disease. These compounds induce DNA damage that may lead to mutation in crucial genes, such as p53 and p21, which are important to regulate cell proliferation, thus leading to cancer. CD9 is a tetraspanin, which are a group of transmembrane proteins that have a role in cell motility and adhesion. The present review aimed to explore the role of CD9 in head and neck cancer. Epidermal growth factor receptor activity and cell proliferation are regulated by the CD9‑integrin/CD9‑transforming growth factor interaction. Hence, CD9 can play a dual role in various types of cancer.

Introduction

Head and neck cancer is common in several regions of the world such as India, Hong Kong and Sri Lanka (1). Head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCCs) are a type of epithelial cancer arising in the mucosa of the upper aerodigestive tract (1). The oral cavity, hypopharynx, oropharynx and larynx are sites that have the potential to be affected by this cancer (1). A tetraspanin member, CD9 is found on the epithelial cells. Hence, it may have a role in the carcinogenesis of head and neck cancer. HNSCCs are aggressive, genetically complex and difficult to treat. HNSCCs can develop from dysplastic or premalignant lesions in the oropharyngeal mucosa that have occurred due to chronic exposure of the upper aerodigestive tract to carcinogenic agents (2).

HNSCCs are associated with different types of epidemiologies, aetiologies and therapies (2). Treatment has to be undertaken by multidisciplinary teams with training in supportive care that considers swallowing, nutrition, dental and voice impairment due to the effects of clinical intervention. In total, 6–90% of patients at early stages of this cancer show positive responses to local therapy. Early diagnosis and appropriate treatment results in cure and survival. The majority of patients with HNSCC who present with stages III and IV locally advanced head and neck cancer require multimodality treatment (3).

HNSCCs begin in the flat squamous cells that make up the thin layer of tissue on the surface of the epithelium in the head and neck. Directly beneath the epithelium, some areas of the head and neck have a layer of moist tissue, called the mucosa. A cancer that is only found in the squamous layer of cells is called carcinoma in situ. Cancer that has grown beyond the mucosa and has moved into the deeper tissue is called invasive squamous cell carcinoma (4). Head and neck cancer, the sixth most common malignancy, accounts for >650,000 cases and 330,000 deaths annually worldwide (13). Women are less likely to be affected than men, with ratios of 1:2 to 4:1 worldwide thus far. In the Indian subcontinent, mouth and tongue cancer are more common, whereas nasopharyngeal cancer is more common in Hong Kong, and pharyngeal and laryngeal cancers are more common in other populations (5).

Oral cancer accounts for 1–3% of all cancer cases worldwide (68). The most adverse factors leading to the death of patients with tongue squamous cell carcinoma are lymph node metastasis and distant metastasis (9,10). The capacity to invade locally and metastasize to regional lymph nodes is the main clinical characteristic of squamous cell carcinoma (11).

Risk factors associated with HNSCC

The use of tobacco and alcohol are associated with HNSCC. Consumption of alcohol and long-term use of tobacco are the main oncogenic drivers and primary risk factors associated with head and neck cancer (5). Using alcohol and tobacco together increases this risk even more (12). Heavy metals, Fanconi anaemia (FA), the plasminogen activator (PA) system, matrix metalloprotease (MMP), human papilloma virus (HPV) and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) are also etiological factors that are associated with head and neck cancer.

Tobacco

A variety of chemicals, including nicotine and other carcinogens, are present in tobacco. The type of tobacco products used and the duration of exposure are two factors that have a major impact on human health. The main constituent of tobacco products and smoke is nicotine. As such, nicotine is non-carcinogenic and addictive, but it has the capacity to activate tumour progression related to various signalling pathways (13,14).

Nicotine-derived nitrosamines, such as 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanone (NNK) and N'-nitrosonornicotine, can cause cancer in humans through the formation of DNA adducts and mutations, and they can promote tumour progression by altering receptor-mediated pathways (7,1530).

Activation of nicotinic acetylcholine and β-adrenergic receptors by nicotine and nitrosamines in turn activates the downstream signal transduction pathways that aid tumour progression (21).

NNK in tobacco smoke naturally occurs in an inert form as a procarcinogen, which is converted to DNA reactive forms by several cytochromes, leading to methylation, pyridyloxobutylation and pyridylhydroxybutylation of nucleobases in DNA (22). The other carcinogens present in tobacco are polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, aromatic amines, aldehydes, phenols, volatile hydrocarbons and nitrocompounds (15,23) (Fig. 1).

Alcohol

The combination of alcohol consumption with cigarette smoking increases the risk of head and neck cancer (24). Alcohol dehydrogenase converts ethanol into acetaldehyde, which is considered a carcinogen of the human upper respiratory tract (24). Cytochrome P450 2E1 (CYP2EI) also has the ability to convert ethanol into acetaldehyde when the amount of alcohol consumed is high. This leads to the formation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) (25). Exocyclic DNA adducts are formed when malonaldehyde and 4-hydroxynonenal, which are the by-products of lipid peroxidation, accumulate by the action of ROS produced by CYP2EI (26). The upregulation of vascular endothelial growth factor and monocyte chemotactic protein-1, which play an important role in tumour angiogenesis and growth, is caused by the accumulation of ROS (27). An increase in the expression of MMPs, such as MMP2 and MMP9, leads to the degradation of the extracellular matrix (ECM), resulting in cell motility, invasion and metastases (28) (Fig. 1).

Heavy metals

According to the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), arsenic (As), cadmium (Cd), chromium (Cr) and nickel (Ni) are category I heavy metals that disrupt tumour suppressor gene expression (29). These heavy metals damage the DNA repair process and metabolism-related enzyme activities (30,31). As is present in organic and inorganic forms, but the organic form of As is less toxic when compared with the inorganic form. Inorganic As compounds are pentavalent and soluble in water and produce salts, such as arsenate (32). Oxidative stress is the major mechanism of As-related damage (33,34). DNA repair processes are inhibited and ROS are the metabolic products in the spleen and liver of the methylated forms of As (35,36). ROS accumulation results in abnormal gene expression and lesions of cellular components that induce cell death (37). Residues of As bind to the DNA-binding proteins and increase the risk of carcinogenesis (38). Cd is an environmental pollutant that is released from industry and agricultural waste (39). B cell lymphoma 2 protein-associated X protein and mitogen-activated protein kinase 1 are associated with Cd (40), which exists in different forms. The trivalent and hexavalent compounds of Cd are biologically toxic as they can induce oxidative stress, DNA damage and apoptosis (4143).

The levels of As, Cd, Cr and Ni have been found to be significantly high in patients with head and neck cancer compared with those in healthy individuals (44). This may be due to altered cellular metabolism during cancer. Occupational or environmental factors might be the reason for this difference in the concentration of heavy metals between patients with cancer and healthy individuals (44).

FA

FA is a genetic disease that is characterised by alteration in one of the 23 genes of the FS pathway or in the 23rd FA gene, DNA repair protein RAD51 homolog 1 (45). Genome stability induced by interstrand DNA crosslink repair in the FA pathway has the potential to induce tumorigenesis (45). Patients with FA are more prone to HNSCC and are more sensitive to severe radiation-induced side effects. Patients with FA who are at higher risk for HNSCC must abstain from other risk factors, such as tobacco, alcohol and HIV infections (45). The main characteristics of this rare autosomal recessive disorder are congenital malformations, such as abnormal thumbs and arms, skeletal abnormalities of the hips, ribs or spine, small reproductive organs in male patients, low body weight at birth, mental retardation, hyperpigmentation, progressive bone marrow failure, and the development of solid tumours (4648).

PA system

An extracellular proteolytic enzyme system, the PA system, comprises various components, such as urokinase-type PA (uPA), its receptor (uPAR), and PA inhibitor-1 and −2. They have a major role in cancer progression and metastasis (49). The activation of plasminogen to plasmin by binding of uPA to uPAR initiates a proteolytic cascade that degrades ECM components, thus facilitating cancer cell migration from the site of origin to distant organs (50). uPA/uPAR overexpression increases tumour cell migration and invasion, playing a key role in metastasis and conferring poor prognosis of patients with head and neck cancer (51). It is associated with focal adhesion kinase 1 and ERK1/2 signalling activation and an increase in HNSCC tumour growth (51,52). Activation of plasmin, ECM degradation and indirect activation of signalling pathways, such as the PI3K-Akt pathway, may be the reasons for this effect (50).

MMP

MMPs are enzymes that degrade the ECM, connective tissue and the basement membrane collagen, which are crucial in cancer cell invasion and progression. They require zinc for their catalytic activity. Type VI collagenase, MMP2 and MMP9 are members of the MMP family of enzymes (5359). In HNSCC, immunohistochemical staining of MMP9 demonstrated that it has prognostic values that are not dependent on tumour stage. Patients with extensive positive MMP9 staining had relatively higher risk of mortality. No correlation has been found between MMP9 and the stage or grade of the tumour (60).

HPV and EBV infection

Inactivation of cellular tumour antigen p53 and cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 2A by cell cycle dysregulation leads to cell proliferation and inhibition of apoptosis in head and neck cancer (61). In oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma caused by HPV, the virus integrates into the host DNA genome, leading to the deregulation of oncoproteins (E6 and E7), which leads to the p53 and retinoblastoma tumour suppressor gene product pRb. P16 upregulation is the result of negative feedback of pRb inactivation. In nasopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma caused by EBV, the cell cycle is the most deregulated pathway. Progression of the G1/S phase is promoted by the inhibition of p16 expression and pRb upregulation (61,62).

Wood and leather dust are the two types of occupational dusts that are classified as type 1 carcinogens by IARC (63). Dusts are small solid particles present in the air with a size ranging from 1 to 100 μm (64). They are a heterogenous group of exposures that can be either organic or inorganic. The carcinogenic effect of dust is exerted through the induction of chronic inflammation, their intrinsic chemical properties or they act as carriers of other carcinogenic compounds (63). Occupational sawdust exposure has been found to increase the risk of laryngeal carcinoma (OR, 1.2; 95% CI, 1.0-1.3) and metal dust (OR, 1.2; 95% CI, 1.0-1.4). Exposure to occupational leather dust can increase the risk of head and neck cancer (OR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.2-1.9) (65).

1,1-thiobis, also known as sulphur mustard, causes blisters on contact with the skin and mucous membrane (66). A reactive intermediate, a cyclic sulfonium ion, is produced as sulphur mustard eliminates a chloride ion by intramolecular nucleophilic substitution. This intermediate causes alkylation of guanine nucleotide of DNA that prevents cell division, which may lead to malignant transformation (67,68).

Radiation is used widely to treat cancers. Radiation-induced sarcomas are seen in long-term survivors of head and neck cancer with a risk of up to 0.3% (69). Treatment of head and neck cancer include surgical eradication, chemotherapy and radiotherapy, which reduce quality of life (including loss of taste and excessive hair loss), and are ineffective. Genetic heterogeneity that results in the loss of function of genes, such as p53 and p16, and the activation of oncogenes, such as epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and PIK3CA, plays an important role in HNSCC (7072).

Biomarkers in head and neck cancer

A biomarker is an objective feature that can be precisely assessed to determine a specific biological, pathological or therapeutic development of the host (73). There are several biomarkers for head and neck cancer. MMPs are enzymes that degrade the ECM and induce cell migration. Serum levels of MMP2, 3 and 9 are elevated in patients with HNSCC (74). Inflammatory markers, such as IL-8 and IL-6, are increased in saliva and serum, respectively (75,76). Cytokeratin 17 is a cytoskeletal intermediate filament that is upregulated in oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) when compared with normal cells, and it has been identified as a immunohistochemical marker for squamous cell carcinoma of the larynx (77,78).

MircoRNAs (miRNAs/miRs) are small non-coding sequences that regulate gene expression after transcription. Levels of miRNAs, such as miR-125a and miR-200a, are significantly lower in subjects with OSCC compared with those in normal subjects (79).

Interferon-γ (IFN-γ) released from activated CD8+ T cells in the tumour microenvironment triggers the transmembrane protein, programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1). T cell energy and programmed cell death can be induced by PD-L1 upregulation when it interacts with programmed death receptor-1 (PD-1), a checkpoint present on the immune cell surface. PD-L1 plays a prognostic role by regulating the relationship between tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes and tumour cells (80,81). HNSCC is a highly immunosuppressive cancer. Blocking the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway has been found to improve the survival of patients with head and neck cancer and reduce tumour growth (82). Progression-free survival was improved in PD-L1-positive patients with head and neck cancer (P=0.01). PD-L1 expression was increased in patients who had HPV-positive HNSCC (P<0.001). Poorer overall survival was observed in patients with positive PD-L1 who had low levels of CD8+ tumour-infiltrating T cells (P=0.03) (83) (Fig. 2).

Fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography is a powerful imaging tool that can be used to identify cervical node metastasis and is a standard of care for patients with III and IV stage HNSCC (84). Patients with lower ΔSUVmax10/20 showed lower overall survival compared with those with higher ΔSUVmax10/20 (P=0.02). The decrease in the SUVmax before and after chemoradiotherapy acts as a potential prognostic marker in patients with head and neck cancer (85).

CD62, also known as L-selectin, is a lectin receptor expressed on leucocytes that regulate the entry of naïve and central memory T cells into lymph nodes (86). The spread of tumour cells to lymph nodes is a multistep process that includes invasion of the tumour cells into the lymphovascular compartment and lodging and growth of the tumour cell in the new environment. The lymph node is the most common region of metastasis for head and neck cancer. Head and neck cancer cells express unrecognized L-selectin that mediates the binding to lymphocytes and thus aids tumour node metastasis (87).

Likewise, tetraspanins are one of the markers for HNSCC. Tetraspanins play a major role in a wide array of cellular processes, including cell adhesion, motility, intracellular signalling, cell matrix adhesion and proliferation (88). Of the 33 tetraspanin proteins, CD9 is being extensively studied (8991).

Tetraspanin CD9

Tetraspanin is a glycoprotein family containing four transmembrane domains. These proteins form multimeric complexes with each other and other cell surface proteins, including integrins, leukocyte antigens and signalling molecules, at specialized tetraspanin-enriched microdomains (92). They also contain distinct palmitoylation sites and most members are glycosylated (93).

The large extracellular loop has highly conserved motifs that aid in the recognition of tetraspanins (94). Cys-Cys-Gly, Phe-X-Ser-Cys and Glu-Gly-Cys are the conserved motifs of CD9 protein (9597). ‘Tetraspanin webs’ are formed by the heteromultimerization of tetraspanins, which are stabilized by the transmembrane domains (9799). There are two subdomains in the EC2 domain, a highly conserved subdomain with residue differences and a subdomain that has variability in size, amino acid sequence and protein folding for the disulphide bridge (90). The interaction between tetraspanins and other transmembrane proteins, such as integrins and other signalling molecules, is regulated by the EC2 domain of the tetraspanin (90,98101) (Fig. 3). Tetraspanins recruit cell surface proteins, which stabilize the functional signalling complexes and act as molecular facilitators (102).

Kersey et al (103) identified CD9 using a monoclonal antibody (binds to acute lymphoblastic leukaemia cells) as the human lymphohematopoietic progenitor cell surface antigen p24. In the systematic nomenclature, Tspan 29 belongs to the tetraspanin family with a molecular weight of 21–24 kDa. CD9 is made up of four transmembrane domains with a small and large extracellular loop (SEL or EC1 and LEL or EC2, respectively) and short intracellular N- and C-terminal tails (104).

Among the tetraspanins, CD9 is unusual as it has only one N-glycosylation site located in its SEL domain, whereas other tetraspanins have a number of glycosylation sites (105). Critical physiological and pathological processes, such as sperm-egg fusion, neurite outgrowth, myotube formation, tumorigenicity and metastasis, are regulated by CD9 (106108).

Mechanism of action of CD9

The molecule that interacts with CD9 decides the role of this tetraspanin in cancer cell motility. The adhesion of tumour cells to the ECM increases when integrin expression is upregulated in combination with CD9. Transcription of MMP2 can be inhibited by CD9 complexes with fibronectin-bound integrins (109). Increased invasiveness of tumour cells can be the result of the activation of intracellular signalling molecules, such as PI4K and Src homology 2, by the transcription of MMP2 induced by CD9 crosslinking (110). Growth factors of the transforming growth factor (TGF) family activate the EGFR. Ectodomain shedding is a process where TGFα is proteolytically cleaved to release an EGF-core containing ligand. Ectodomain shedding and the release of TGFα is affected when it interacts with CD9, as it regulates the cleavage TGFα, which may lead to constant activation of EGFR, resulting in cell proliferation (110,111) (Fig. 4).

In CD9-overexpressed cells, the NF-κB signalling pathway has been found to be activated and dependent on CD9 expression. CD9 also induced tumour necrosis factor α (TNFα) gene expression, which resulted in the increase of IL-6 and IL-8 levels. NF-κB subunits, upon activation by TNFα, activate the transcription of genes involved in cell proliferation and differentiation by translocating into the nucleus. CD9 activates the caspase-3 inhibitor, which reduces the activity of caspase-3. Blockage of CD9 expression with small interfering RNA increases the level of caspase-3 activity. This shows that CD9 has anti-apoptotic activity (112) (Fig. 5).

CD9 as a friend of HNSCC

Favourable clinical outcomes have been observed in HNSCC with elevated CD9 expression. Tetraspanins or α3β1 integrins show an association with CD9 on the cell-to-cell junctions of human umbilical vein endothelial cells (109113). Migration of endothelial cells during wound repair has been reported to be inhibited by anti-CD9 antibodies (101,114117), which indicates the stabilizing effect of CD9 antigen on the integrity of the vascular membranes. During tumour angiogenesis, downregulation of CD9 proteins may be linked to vascular supply reorganization (89). CD9 acts by setting up the junctions between the cell surface and the intercellular matrix via the formation of a functional signalling complex with other cell surface proteins (98,118121). Motility-related protein 1 (MRP-1)/CD9 expression was the only predictive parameter that seemed to be significant with respect to overall survival (P>0.049), whereas CD9 expression (P>0.006) and lymph node status (P>0.007) were significant for prolonged disease-free survival. Tumour patients with lower CD9 expression survived shorter periods of time than patients with high CD9 levels in the overall survival curves estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis (P>0.04) (89). The potential effects of CD9 were confirmed when its expression was observed in the tumour vessels, indicating the involvement of this protein in tumour angiogenesis and endothelial cell migration (89).

Patients with positive CD9 tumours show shorter disease-free survival and overall survival than patients with negative CD9 expression in OSCC (100). Metastatic lesions have been reported in patients with lack of expression of these proteins, and they tended to have poorer prognosis and lower rates of survival (122126). The incidence of cervical lymph node metastasis and survival has been found to be significantly associated with the abnormal expression of the CD9 protein (90).

One of the most common cancers in the head and neck region is laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC) (91). The tumour grows in the glottic, supraglottic and subglottic areas. Death and the patient's quality of life are influenced by infiltration and metastasis, which have become the primary factors leading to an increase in the incidence of LSCC (91). Patients with negative CD9 protein expression have shorter median survival times compared with patients with positive CD9 protein expression (P<0.01) (91). LSCC may develop due to the combined participation of CD9 and another tetraspanin protein, CD82 (91). Infiltration, prognosis of LSCC and metastasis can be determined by using CD9 as a marker. Patients with TNM stage I–II, which is well-differentiated and non-metastatic LSCC, show higher CD9 positive expression than patients with TNM stage III–IV, which is well-differentiated and metastatic LSCC (91). These results show that as the expression of CD9 decreases, the invasiveness and the metastatic potential of the cancer cells increase (91).

Overexpression of CD9 by transfection leads to the suppression of cell motility (127,128). In oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma, lymph node metastasis may be facilitated by a decrease in CD9 expression (129). Patient prognosis can be predicted by the expression status of CD9 (129). A previous study reported that the cell membranes of normal oesophageal epithelial cells show positive CD9 expression, whereas CD9 expression is reduced on the membranes of cancer cells. As the tumours grew deeper, the levels of reduced CD9 expression significantly increased. As the stage of cancer advanced, the expression of MRP-1/CD9 was reduced. Lymph node metastasis and CD9 expression showed a significant inverse correlation, but there was no correlation between CD9 expression and distant metastasis. A correlation was found between lymph node metastases and lymphatic invasion. The 5-year survival rates of patients with CD9 positive expression were significantly improved compared with those patients with low or negative CD9 expression (129). The closest sites to the primary lesions may be affected by the loss of CD9, leading to local lymph node metastasis. Hence, there might be an inverse correlation between CD9 expression and lymphatic invasion (129). The adhesion effects of the interaction between CD9 and heparin-binding EGF-like growth factor associated with α3β1 integrin may play an important role in the initiation of the metastatic cascade (130,131). CD9 antibody activates platelets and their aggregation, thereby releasing the growth factors that facilitate tumour activation or growth (127,132).

In total, ~50% of gingival squamous cell carcinoma (GSCCs) cases show high oral malignant neoplasms and present with cervical lymph node metastasis (133). The jawbone and its surrounding tissues, such as nerves, muscles, the nasal cavity and skin, are invaded by GSCC. Logistic regression analysis with cervical lymph node metastasis as a target variable has shown that CD9/ACTB (P=0.013) and CD9/CD82 (P=0.013) have significant association (133). CD9 is related to the invasiveness of cancer cells by controlling the function of integrin receptors (133). Lymph node metastasis has been shown to be related to an increased level of the integrin a3 gene and a reduced level of CD9, as indicated in OSCC gene expression analysis (134,135). A previous in vitro study demonstrated that the main regulator of cell motility, the microvilli-like protrusions arising from the cancer cells, had clusters of tetraspanin-a3 integrin complexes on them. Upon treating the cells with tetraspanin and integrin antibodies, the cancer cells had increased invasive potential due to the stimulation of MMP2 production and elevated long invasive protrusion formation (136). Cancer cell motility is negatively influenced by CD9 via actin cytoskeleton reorganization. There is a negative correlation between CD9/ACTB gene expression and lymph node metastasis. Cytoskeleton reconstruction related to elevated ACTB expression may be associated with a decrease in CD9 expression (137).

In papillary thyroid microcarcinoma, the patients' age, multifocality and extrathyroidal extension are known factors that can be used for prognosis (138). CD9 immunostaining intensity has been found to be higher in patients with lymph node metastasis than inpatients without metastasis (P=0.002) (138). CD9 intensity is also correlated with lymph node metastasis, suggesting that CD9 can be considered a prognostic marker for lymph node metastasis in papillary thyroid microcarcinoma (138).

CD9 as a foe

Through its association with other partner proteins, CD9 has various functions and has been identified as a tumour suppressor (139). CD9 is involved in and modifies the steps of tumour formation, such as proliferation, apoptosis, migration, adhesion and angiogenesis, and the communication with the environment, dissemination and metastasis (139). Thus, CD9 has a major role in cancer development and progression. Venous vessel invasion, metastasis and poor prognosis are related to tetraspanin CD9 (139). Upon treating patients with gastric cancer with CD9 antibody, tumour progression was found to be inhibited by antiproliferative, pro-apoptotic and anti-angiogenic effects. This indicates that CD9 may be target in patients with gastric cancer (139).

The EGFR has shown association with CD9. EGFR amplification is a characteristic of glioblastoma histology, affecting the signal transduction pathway. CD9 has the ability to attenuate the ligand-induced activation of the receptor via the destabilization of the surface expression of EGFR (140). Phosphorylation of EGFR at specific sites has been shown to be decreased by CD9 (141). Additionally, cell growth and proliferation pathways, such as EGFR signalling of PI3K/Akt and MAPK/Erk, can be attenuated by CD9. By contrast, activation of EGFR signal transduction pathways, including PI3K/Akt and MAPK/Erk, can be enhanced by the reduction in CD9 expression via small hairpin RNA-mediated knockdown of CD9. Inhibition of the activity of PI3K/Akt and MAPK/Erk signalling pathways and phosphorylation of EGFR maybe the mechanism underlying the CD9-induced suppression of cell proliferation (141). CD9, along with other transmembrane proteins, has the ability to regulate cell migration (142,143).

CD9 has been identified as a glioma stem cell-enriched protein. In a context-dependent manner, CD9 is associated with the progression of malignant tumours and plays a role in pro-tumorigenesis to promote cancer invasion and tumour growth in glioblastomas (144). Predicting patient survival using CD9 expression is a potential prognostic tool (145). According to previous reports, cell proliferation and tumour formation are facilitated by CD9 (129,133,144,146).

The progression of solid tumours is associated with CD9 downregulation. Patients with advanced stages lack these molecules, and reduced expression is observed less in primary site tumours than in metastatic tumours. CD9 may contribute to the highly invasive and metastatic phenotype of small cell lung carcinoma. Thus, CD9 is an indicator of poor survival (147).

CD9 expression is an independent prognostic factor of post-operation recurrence-free survival (RFS) for gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GIST), as shown by the Cox proportion hazards regression (HR, 0.104; 95% CI, 0.021-0.528; P=0.006). The RFS of patients with CD9-negative expression was significantly worse than that of the CD9-positive expression group (148). CD9 plays a role in the inhibition of proliferation and metastasis by inhibiting the activation, degradation and secretion of the Wnt signalling pathway, TGFα and metalloproteinase (143,149,150). Downregulation of CD9 is correlated with tumour invasion and metastasis and is a poor prognostic marker in various cancers, such as like breast, colon, small cell lung cancer. Malignant behaviour and tumour progression can be a result of reduced CD9 expression (148). The post-operative three-year RFS rate of the CD9-negative group was found to be lower than that of the CD9-positive group (33.3 vs. 78.4%; P<0.001), as shown in the universal analysis of comparison between the CD-negative and CD9-positive group (148). RFS can be predicted independently using CD9 expression via multivariate analysis (148). This result showed that CD9 is important in the invasion and metastasis of GIST, and the risk of metastasis and recurrence increases as the expression of CD9 decreases. Hence, the aggressive and progressive behaviour of GIST can be predicted using CD9 expression (148).

The survival rate of patients with colon cancer with CD9-positive tumours was reported to be significantly higher than that of patients with CD9-negative tumours (151). Cell motility inhibition and induction of apoptosis promoted by concurrent GM3 synthesis and N-glycosylation may be related to the suppression of malignancy by CD9 (152). The transmembrane 4 superfamily protein CD9 regulates cell motility by acting as a link between extracellular integrins and intracellular signalling molecules, such as phosphatidylinositol 4-kinase (153155).

Increased invasiveness of breast cancer tumour cells may be the result of activation of intracellular signalling molecules, such as PI4K and Src homology, by CD9 crosslink-induced MMP2 transcription (110). In epithelial cells, cleavage of TGFα is protected by the interaction with CD9, which leads to the persistent activation of EGFR (105,106). Patients without CD9 expression had improved overall survival (P=0.051) and disease-free survival (P=0.014) compared with patients with CD9 expression (109). The survival of patients with breast cancer decreased due to altered cellular proliferation induced by activated EGFR signalling (108).

Conclusions

In several human cancers (Table I), CD9 has different effects on different types of cells. In epithelial cells, the expression of CD9 on the tumour cell has shown association with favourable clinical outcomes. Hence, CD9 can be regarded as a tumour prognostic biomarker. It is useful for making decisions regarding postoperative treatment. CD9 in tumour inhibition or tumour progression depends on the molecule that interacts with CD9 (Fig. 6). In conclusion, CD9 interacts with several molecules that result in altered behaviour of cancer cells. This behaviour is different for each cancer. Thus, determination of the function and interaction of CD9 in various types of cancer that result in reduced cell motility may be of clinical importance.

Table I.

CD9 expression in different types of cancer.

Table I.

CD9 expression in different types of cancer.

Serial no.CancerObservations(Refs.)
1Head and neck cancerLower survival rates of patients with lower CD9 expression compared with those with higher CD9 expression(86)
2Oral squamous cell carcinomaA correlation was observed between positive CD9 expression and overall survival(119)
3Laryngeal squamous cell carcinomaPatients with positive CD9 expression showed higher median survival. Non-metastatic tumours had higher CD9 expression(88)
4Oesophageal squamous cell carcinomaCD9 expression and metastasis showed an inverse correlation. The survival of patients with CD9-positive expression was higher compared with those with CD9-negative expression(126)
5Gingival squamous cell carcinomaCD9 showed a strong correlation with cervical lymph node metastasis(130)
6Papillary thyroid microcarcinomaCD9 expression was higher in patients with lymph node metastasis(135)
7GlioblastomaCD9 expression was associated with the progression of a malignant tumour(141)
8Small cell lung carcinomaCD9 expression was higher in the primary tumour and reduced in advanced stages of cancer(144)
9Gastro-intestinal stromal tumoursAs CD9 expression decreased, the risk of metastasis and invasion increased(145)
10Colon cancerThe survival rate of CD9-positive tumours was higher than that for CD9-negative tumours(143)
11Breast cancerPatients with negative CD9 expression had improved overall survival compared with patients with positive CD9 expression(102)

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

Funding: No funding was received.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Authors' contributions

SPC wrote the manuscript, and was responsible for the original draft preparation, research and editing. SSS supervised, and wrote, reviewed and edited the manuscript. SKN supervised, validated the research, and wrote, reviewed and edited the manuscript. PKS and PP made revisions to the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript. Data authentication is not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Patient consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

1 

Grandis JR, Melhem MF, Gooding WE, Day R, Holst VA, Wagener MM, Drenning SD and Tweardy DJ: Levels of TGF-α and EGFR protein in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma and patient survival. J Natl Cancer Inst. 90:824–832. 1998. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

2 

National Comprehensive Cancer Network: Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. Head and Neck Cancer. v1:2017.Available from. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/f_guidelines.asp#site

3 

Lo Nigro C, Denaro N, Merlotti A and Merlano M: Head and neck cancer: Improving outcomes with a multidisciplinary approach. Cancer Manag Res. 9:363–371. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

4 

https://www.cancer.net/cancer-types/head-and-neck-cancer/introduction

5 

https://www.uptodate.com/contents/epidemiology-and-risk-factors-for-head-and-neck-cancer?search=epidemiology-and-risk-factors-for-head-and-neck-cancer.&source=search_result&selectedTitle=1~150&usage_type=default&display_rank=1

6 

Hukkanen J, Jacob PII and Benowitz NL: Metabolism and disposition kinetics of nicotine. Pharmacol Rev. 57:79–115. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

7 

Warren GW and Singh AK: Nicotine and lung cancer. J Carcinog. 12:12013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

8 

Hecht SS: Tobacco carcinogens, their biomarkers and tobacco-induced cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 3:733–744. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

9 

Doll R and Peto R: The causes of cancer: Quantitative estimates of avoidable risks of cancer in the United States today. J Natl Cancer Inst. 66:1191–1308. 1981. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

10 

US Department of Health and Human Services, . Reducing the Health Consequences of Smoking: 25 Years of Progress. A Report of the Surgeon General; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; Atlanta, GA: 1989

11 

Secretan B, Straif K, Baan R, Grosse Y, El Ghissassi F, Bouvard V, Benbrahim-Tallaa L, Guha N, Freeman C, Galichet L, et al: A review of human carcinogens-Part E: Tobacco, areca nut, alcohol, coal smoke, and salted fish. Lancet Oncol. 10:1033–1034. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

12 

https://www.cancer.net/cancer-types/head-and-neck-cancer/risk-factors-and-prevention

13 

US Department of Health and Human Services, . How Tobacco Smoke Causes Disease: The Biology and Behavioral Basis for Smoking-attributable Disease. A Report of the Surgeon General; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; Atlanta, GA: 2010

14 

IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, . Smokeless tobacco and some tobacco-specific N-nitrosamines. IARC Monogr Eval Carcinog Risks Hum. 89:1–592. 2007.PubMed/NCBI

15 

Takahashi H, Ogata H, Nishigaki R, Broide DH and Karin M: Tobacco smoke promotes lung tumorigenesis by triggering IKKbeta- and JNK1-dependent inflammation. Cancer Cell. 17:89–97. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

16 

Boyland E, Roe FJ and Gorrod JW: Induction of Pulmonary tumors in mice by nitrosonornicotine, a possible constituent of tobacco smoke. Nature. 202:11261964. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

17 

IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, . Tobacco smoke and involuntary smoking. IARC Monogr Eval Carcinog Risks Hum. 83:1–1438. 2004.PubMed/NCBI

18 

Acetaldehyde. IARC Monogr Eval Carcinog Risk Chem Hum. 36:101–132. 1985.PubMed/NCBI

19 

Seitz HK and Stickel F: Molecular mechanisms of alcohol-mediated carcinogenesis. Nat Rev Cancer. 7:599–612. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

20 

Haorah J, Ramirez SH, Floreani N, Gorantla S, Morsey B and Persidsky Y: Mechanism of alcohol-induced oxidative stress and neuronal injury. Free Radic Biol Med. 45:1542–1550. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

21 

Wang F, Yang JL, Yu KK, Xu M, Xu YZ, Chen L, Lu YM, Fang HS, Wang XY, Hu ZQ, et al: Activation of the NF-κB pathway as a mechanism of alcohol enhanced progression and metastasis of human hepatocellular carcinoma. Mol Cancer. 14:102015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

22 

Shinohara M, Adachi Y, Mitsushita J, Kuwabara M, Nagasawa A, Harada S, Furuta S, Zhang Y, Seheli K, Miyazaki H and Kamata T: Reactive oxygen generated by NADPH oxidase 1 (NOX1) contributes to cell invasion by regulating matrix metalloprotease-9 production and cell migration. J Biol Chem. 285:4481–4488. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

23 

Ha PK, Chang SS, Glazer CA, Califano JA and Sidransky D: Molecular techniques and genetic alterations in head and neck cancer. Oral Oncol. 45:335–339. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

24 

Suh Y, Amelio I, Guerrero Urbano T and Tavassoli M: Clinical update on cancer: Molecular oncology of head and neck cancer. Cell Death Dis. 5:e10182014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

25 

Leemans CR, Snijders PJF and Brakenhoff RH: The molecular landscape of head and neck cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 18:269–282. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

26 

Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E and Forman D: Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 61:69–90. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

27 

Warnakulasuriya S: Global epidemiology of oral and oropharyngeal cancer. Oral Oncol. 45:309–316. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

28 

Kawakita A, Yanamoto S, Yamada S, Naruse T, Takahashi H, Kawasaki G and Umeda M: Microrna-21 promotes oral cancer invasion via the Wnt/β-catenin pathway by targeting DKK2. Pathol Oncol Res. 20:253–261. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

29 

IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risk to Human. Vol 100C. International Agency for Research on Cancer; Lyon: 2012

30 

Bánfalvi G: Heavy metals, trace elements and their cellular effects. Cellular Effects of Heavy Metals. Banfalvi G: Springer; Dordrecht: 2011, View Article : Google Scholar

31 

Ercal N, Gurer-Orhan H and Aykin-Burns N: Toxic metals and oxidative stress part I: Mechanisms involved in metal-induced oxidative damage. Curr Top Med Chem. 1:529–539. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

32 

Grund SC, Hanusch K and Wolf HU: Arsenic and arsenic compounds, Ullmann's encyclopedia of industrial chemistry. Wiley-VCH; Weinheim: 2005

33 

Shi H, Shi X and Liu KJ: Oxidative mechanism of arsenic toxicity and carcinogenesis. Mol Cell Biochem. 255:67–78. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

34 

Flora SJ: Arsenic-induced oxidative stress and its reversibility. Free Radic Biol Med. 51:257–281. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

35 

Hartwig A and Schwerdtle T: Interactions by carcinogenic metal compounds with DNA repair processes: Toxicological implications. Toxicol Lett. 127:47–54. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

36 

Mass MJ, Tennant A, Roop BC, Cullen WR, Styblo M, Thomas DJ and Kligerman AD: Methylated trivalent arsenic species are genotoxic. Chem Res Toxicol. 14:355–361. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

37 

Bau DT, Wang TS, Chung CH, Wang AS, Wang AS and Jan KY: Oxidative DNA adducts and DNA-protein cross-links are the major DNA lesions induced by arsenite. Environ Health Perspect. 110 (Suppl 5):S753–S756. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

38 

Goering PL, Aposhian HV, Mass MJ, Cebrián M, Beck BD and Waalkes MP: The enigma of arsenic carcinogenesis: Role of metabolism. Toxicol Sci. 49:5–14. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

39 

Wilson K, Yang H, Seo CW and Marshall WE: Select metal adsorption by activated carbon made from peanut shells. Bioresour Technol. 97:2266–2270. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

40 

Kim HS, Kim YJ and Seo YR: An overview of carcinogenic heavy metal: Molecular toxicity mechanism and prevention. J Cancer Prev. 20:232–240. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

41 

Dayan AD and Paine AJ: Mechanisms of chromium toxicity, carcinogenicity and allergenicity: Review of the literature from 1985 to 2000. Hum Exp Toxicol. 20:439–451. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

42 

Eastmond DA, MacGregor JT and Slesinski RS: Trivalent chromium: Assessing the genotoxic risk of an essential trace element and widely used human and animal nutritional supplement. Crit Rev Toxicol. 38:173–190. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

43 

Katz SA and Salem H: The toxicology of chromium with respect to its chemical speciation: A review. J Appl Toxicol. 13:217–224. 1993. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

44 

Khlifi R, Olmedo P, Gil F, Hammami B, Chakroun A, Rebai A and Hamza-Chaffai A: Arsenic, cadmium, chromium and nickel in cancerous and healthy tissues from patients with head and neck cancer. Sci Total Environ. 452:58–67. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

45 

Beddok A, Krieger S, Castera L, Stoppa-Lyonnet D and Thariat J: Management of fanconi anemia patients with head and neck carcinoma: Diagnosis and treatment adaptation. Oral Oncol. 108:1048162020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

46 

Gasparini G, Longobardi G, Boniello R, Di Petrillo A and Pelo S: Fanconi anemia manifesting as a squamous cell carcinoma of the hard palate: A case report. Head Face Med. 2:12006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

47 

Swift MR and Hirschhorn K: Fanconi's anemia. Inherited susceptibility to chromosome breakage in various tissues. Ann Intern Med. 65:496–503. 1966. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

48 

Esparza A and Thompson WR: Familial hypoplastic anemia with multiple congenital anomalies (Fanconi's syndrome)-report of three cases. Cases presented are of two sisters and a female cousin with complete clinical and post mortem findings. R I Med J. 49:103–110. 1966.PubMed/NCBI

49 

Mahmood N, Mihalcioiu C and Rabbani SA: Multifaceted role of the urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) and its receptor (uPAR): Diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic applications. Front Oncol. 8:242018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

50 

Pavón MA, Arroyo-Solera I, Céspedes MV, Casanova I, León X and Mangues R: uPA/uPAR and SERPINE1 in head and neck cancer: Role in tumor resistance, metastasis, prognosis and therapy. Oncotarget. 7:57351–57366. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

51 

Ghiso JA, Kovalski K and Ossowski L: Tumor dormancy induced by downregulation of urokinase receptor in human carcinoma involves integrin and MAPK signaling. J Cell Biol. 147:89–104. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

52 

Ghiso JA: Inhibition of FAK signaling activated by urokinase receptor induces dormancy in human carcinoma cells in vivo. Oncogene. 21:2513–2524. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

53 

Nagase H and Woessner JF Jr: Matrix metalloproteinases. J Biol Chem. 274:21491–21494. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

54 

Liotta LA and Stetler-Stevenson WG: Metalloproteinases and cancer invasion. Semin Cancer Biol. 1:99–106. 1990.PubMed/NCBI

55 

Nelson AR, Fingleton B, Rothenberg ML and Matrisian LM: Matrix metalloproteinases: Biologic activity and clinical implications. J Clin Oncol. 18:1135–1149. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

56 

Shapiro SD: Matrix metalloproteinase degradation of extracellular matrix: Biological consequences. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 10:602–608. 1998. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

57 

Stetler-Stevenson WG: Type IV collagenases in tumor invasion and metastasis. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 9:289–303. 1990. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

58 

Stetler-Stevenson WG, Hewitt R and Corcoran M: Matrix metalloproteinases and tumor invasion: From correlation and causality to the clinic. Semin Cancer Biol. 7:147–154. 1996. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

59 

Stetler-Stevenson WG and Anita EY: Proteases in invasion: Matrix metalloproteinases. Semin Cancer Biol. 11:143–152. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

60 

Ruokolainen H, Pääkkö P and Turpeenniemi-Hujanen T: Expression of matrix metalloproteinase-9 in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: A potential marker for prognosis. Clin Cancer Res. 10:3110–3116. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

61 

Angiero F, Gatta LB, Seramondi R, Berenzi A, Benetti A, Magistro S, Ordesi P, Grigolato P and Dessy E: Frequency and role of HPV in the progression of epithelial dysplasia to oral cancer. Anticancer Res. 30:3435–3440. 2010.PubMed/NCBI

62 

Zhang W, Zeng Z, Zhou Y, Xiong W, Fan S, Xiao L, Huang D, Li Z, Li D, Wu M, et al: Identification of aberrant cell cycle regulation in Epstein-Barr virus-associated nasopharyngeal carcinoma by cDNA microarray and gene set enrichment analysis. Acta Biochim Biophys Sin (Shanghai). 41:414–428. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

63 

International Agency for Research on Cancer, . A review of human carcinogens: Arsenic, metals, fibres, and dusts. IARC Monogr Eval Carcinog Risks Hum. 100:169–211. 2012.PubMed/NCBI

64 

Prevention and Control Exchange (PACE) World Health Organization. Occupational and Environmental Health Team, . Hazard Prevention and Control in the Work Environment: Airborne Dust. World Health Organisation. 1999.Available from. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/66147

65 

Langevin SM, McClean MD, Michaud DS, Eliot M, Nelson HH and Kelsey KT: Occupational dust exposure and head and neck squamous cell carcinoma risk in a population-based case-control study conducted in the greater Boston area. Cancer Med. 2:978–986. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

66 

Panahi Y, Gholami N, Ghojazadeh M, Moslemi F, Naghavi-Behzad M, Azami-Aghdash S, Ghaffari A and Piri R: Complications and carcinogenic effects of mustard Gas-a systematic review and meta-analysis in Iran. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 16:7567–7573. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

67 

Safarinejad MR: Testicular effect of mustard gas. Urology. 58:90–94. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

68 

McClintock SD, Till GO, Smith MG and Ward PA: Protection from half-mustard-gas-induced acute lung injury in the rat. J Appl Toxicol. 22:257–262. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

69 

Thiagarajan A and Iyer NG: Radiation-induced sarcomas of the head and neck. World J Clin Oncol. 5:973–981. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

70 

Ho CM, Lam KH, Wei WI, Lau SK and Lam LK: Occult lymph node metastasis in small oral tongue cancers. Head Neck. 14:359–363. 1992. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

71 

Spiro RH, Huvos AG, Wong GY, Spiro JD, Gnecco CA and Strong EW: Predictive value of tumor thickness in squamous carcinoma confined to the tongue and floor of the mouth. Am J Surg. 152:345–350. 1986. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

72 

Kawano K and Yanagisawa S: Predictive value of laminin-5 and membrane type 1-matrix metalloproteinase expression for cervical lymph node metastasis in T1 and T2 squamous cell carcinomas of the tongue and floor of the mouth. Head Neck. 28:525–533. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

73 

Califf RM: Biomarker definitions and their applications. Exp Biol Med (Maywood). 243:213–221. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

74 

Kuropkat C, Plehn S, Herz U, Dunne AA, Renz H and Werner JA: Tumor marker potential of serum matrix metalloproteinases in patients with head and neck cancer. Anticancer Res. 22:2221–2227. 2002.PubMed/NCBI

75 

Li Y, St John MA, Zhou X, Kim Y, Sinha U, Jordan RC, Eisele D, Abemayor E, Elashoff D, Park NH and Wong DT: Salivary transcriptome diagnostics for oral cancer detection. Clin Cancer Res. 10:8442–8450. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

76 

St John MA, Li Y, Zhou X, Denny P, Ho CM, Montemagno C, Shi W, Qi F, Wu B, Sinha U, et al: Interleukin-6 and interleukin-8 as potential biomarkers for oral cavity and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 130:929–935. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

77 

Toyoshima T, Vairaktaris E, Nkenke E, Schlegel KA, Neukam FW and Ries J: Cytokeratin 17 mRNA expression has potential for diagnostic marker of oral squamous cell carcinoma. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 134:515–521. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

78 

Cohen-Kerem R, Madah W, Sabo E, Rahat MA, Greenberg E and Elmalah I: Cytokeratin-17 as a potential marker for squamous cell carcinoma of the larynx. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 113:821–827. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

79 

Park NJ, Zhou H, Elashoff D, Henson BS, Kastratovic DA, Abemayor E and Wong DT: Salivary microRNA: Discovery, characterization, and clinical utility for oral cancer detection. Clin Cancer Res. 15:5473–5477. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

80 

Concha-Benavente F, Srivastava RM, Trivedi S, Lei Y, Chandran U, Seethala RR, Freeman GJ and Ferris RL: Identification of the cell-intrinsic and -extrinsic pathways downstream of EGFR and IFNγ that induce PD-L1 expression in head and neck cancer. Cancer Res. 76:1031–1043. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

81 

Dong H, Strome SE, Salomao DR, Tamura H, Hirano F, Flies DB, Roche PC, Lu J, Zhu G, Tamada K, et al: Tumor-associated B7-H1 promotes T-cell apoptosis: A potential mechanism of immune evasion. Nat Med. 8:793–800. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

82 

Hira-Miyazawa M, Nakamura H, Hirai M, Kobayashi Y, Kitahara H, Bou-Gharios G and Kawashiri S: Regulation of programmed-death ligand in the human head and neck squamous cell carcinoma microenvironment is mediated through matrix metalloproteinase-mediated proteolytic cleavage. Int J Oncol. 52:379–388. 2018.PubMed/NCBI

83 

Yang WF, Wong MC, Thomson PJ, Li KY and Su YX: The prognostic role of PD-L1 expression for survival in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Oral Oncol. 86:81–90. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

84 

Goel R, Moore W, Sumer B, Khan S, Sher D and Subramaniam RM: Clinical practice in PET/CT for the management of head and neck squamous cell cancer. Am J Roentgenol. 209:289–303. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

85 

Hentschel M, Appold S, Schreiber A, Abolmaali N, Abramyuk A, Dörr W, Kotzerke J, Baumann M and Zöphel K: Early FDG PET at 10 or 20 Gy under chemoradiotherapy is prognostic for locoregional control and overall survival in patients with head and neck cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 38:1203–1211. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

86 

Mohammed RN, Watson HA, Vigar M, Ohme J, Thomson A, Humphreys IR and Ager A: L-selectin is essential for delivery of activated CD8(+) T cells to virus-infected organs for protective immunity. Cell Rep. 14:760–771. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

87 

Resto VA, Burdick MM, Dagia NM, McCammon SD, Fennewald SM and Sackstein R: L-selectin-mediated lymphocyte-cancer cell interactions under low fluid shear conditions. J Biol Chem. 283:15816–15824. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

88 

Longo N, Yáñez-Mó M, Mittelbrunn M, de la Rosa G, Muñoz ML, Sánchez-Madrid F and Sánchez-Mateos P: Regulatory role of tetraspanin CD9 in tumor-endothelial cell interaction during transendothelial invasion of melanoma cells. Blood. 98:3717–3726. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

89 

Kohmo S, Kijima T, Otani Y, Mori M, Minami T, Takahashi R, Nagatomo I, Takeda Y, Kida H, Goya S, et al: Cell surface tetraspanin CD9 mediates chemoresistance in small cell lung cancer. Cancer Res. 70:8025–8035. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

90 

Stipp CS, Kolesnikova TV and Hemler ME: Functional domains in tetraspanin proteins. Trends Biochem Sci. 28:106–112. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

91 

Kitadokoro K, Bordo D, Galli G, Petracca R, Falugi F, Abrignani S, Grandi G and Bolognesi M: CD81 extracellular domain 3D structure: Insight into the tetraspanin superfamily structural motifs. EMBO J. 20:12–18. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

92 

Hemler ME: Specific tetraspanin functions. J Cell Biol. 155:1103–1107. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

93 

Clark KL, Oelke A, Johnson ME, Eilert KD, Simpson PC and Todd SC: CD81 associates with 14-3-3 in a redox-regulated palmitoylation-dependent manner. J Biol Chem. 279:19401–19406. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

94 

Kovalenko OV, Metcalf DG, degrado WF and Hemler ME: Structural organization and interactions of transmembrane domains in tetraspanin proteins. BMC Struct Biol. 5:112005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

95 

Fitter S, Seldin MF and Ashman LK: Characterisation of the mouse homologue of CD151 (PETA-3/SFA-1); genomic structure, chromosomal localisation and identification of 2 novel splice forms. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1398:75–85. 1998. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

96 

Stipp CS, Kolesnikova TV and Hemler ME: EWI-2 regulates alpha3beta1 integrin-dependent cell functions on laminin-5. J Cell Biol. 163:1167–1177. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

97 

Seigneuret M, Delaguillaumie A, Lagaudrière-Gesbert C and Conjeaud H: Structure of the tetraspanin main extracellular domain. A partially conserved fold with a structurally variable domain insertion. J Biol Chem. 276:40055–40064. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

98 

Maecker HT, Todd SC and Levy S: The tetraspanin superfamily: Molecular facilitators. FASEB J. 11:428–442. 1997. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

99 

Yanez-Mo M, Mittelbrunn M and Sanchez-Madrid F: Tetraspanins and intercellular interactions. Microcirculation. 8:153–168. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

100 

Boucheix C and Rubinstein E: Tetraspanins. Cell Mol Life Sci. 58:1189–1205. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

101 

Boucheix C, Benoit P, Frachet P, Billard M, Worthington RE, Gagnon J and Uzan G: Molecular cloning of the CD9 antigen. A new family of cell surface proteins. J Biol Chem. 266:117–122. 1991. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

102 

Ovalle S, Gutiérrez-López MD, Olmo N, Turnay J, Lizarbe MA, Majano P, Molina-Jiménez F, López-Cabrera M, Yáñez-Mó M, Sánchez-Madrid F and Cabañas C: The tetraspanin CD9 inhibits the proliferation and tumorigenicity of human colon carcinoma cells. Int J Cancer. 121:2140–2152. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

103 

Kersey JH, LeBien TW, Abramson CS, Newman R, Sutherland R and Greaves M: P-24: A human leukemia-associated and lymphohemopoietic progenitor cell surface structure identified with monoclonal antibody. J Exp Med. 153:726–731. 1981. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

104 

Wright MD, Moseley GW and van Spriel AB: Tetraspanin microdomains in immune cell signalling and malignant disease. Tissue Antigens. 64:533–542. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

105 

Hemler ME: Targeting of tetraspanin proteins-potential benefits and strategies. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 7:747–758. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

106 

Baek J, Jang N, Choi JE, Kim JR and Bae YK: CD9 expression in tumor cells is associated with poor prognosis in patients with invasive lobular carcinoma. J Breast Cancer. 22:77–85. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

107 

Zöller M: Tetraspanins: Push and pull in suppressing and promoting metastasis. Nat Rev Cancer. 9:40–55. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

108 

Shi W, Fan H, Shum L and Derynck R: The tetraspanin CD9 associates with transmembrane TGF-alpha and regulates TGF-alpha-induced EGF receptor activation and cell proliferation. J Cell Biol. 148:591–602. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

109 

Hwang JR, Jo K, Lee Y, Sung BJ, Park YW and Lee JH: Upregulation of CD9 in ovarian cancer is related to the induction of TNF-α gene expression and constitutive NF-κB activation. Carcinogenesis. 33:77–83. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

110 

Yáñez-Mó M, Alfranca A, Cabañas C, Marazuela M, Tejedor R, Ursa MA, Ashman LK, de Landázuri MO and Sánchez-Madrid F: Regulation of endothelial cell motility by complexes of tetraspan molecules CD81/TAPA-1 and CD151/PETA-1 with a3b1 integrin localized at endothelial lateral junctions. J Cell Biol. 141:791–804. 1998. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

111 

Okochi H, Kato M, Nashiro K, Yoshie O, Miyazono K and Furue M: Expression of tetra-spans transmembrane family (CD9, CD37, CD53, CD63, CD81 and CD82) in normal and neoplastic human keratinocytes: An association of CD9 with alpha 3 beta 1 integrin. Br J Dermatol. 137:856–863. 1997. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

112 

Nishida M, Miyagawa J, Yamashita S, Higashiyama S, Nakata A, Ouchi N, Tamura R, Yamamori K, Kihara S, Taniguchi N and Matsuzawa Y: Localization of CD9, an enhancer protein for proheparin-binding epidermal growth factor-like growth factor, in human atherosclerotic plaques: Possible involvement of juxtacrine growth mechanism on smooth muscle cell proliferation. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 20:1236–1243. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

113 

Klein-Soyer C, Azorsa DO, Cazenave JP and Lanza F: CD9 participates in endothelial cell migration during in vitro wound repair. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 20:360–369. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

114 

Peñas PF, García-Díez A, Sánchez-Madrid F and Yáñez-Mó M: Tetraspanins are localized at motility-related structures and involved in normal human keratinocyte wound healing migration. J Invest Dermatol. 114:1126–1135. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

115 

Lijen HR, Lupu F, Collen D, Le Nour F and Boucheix C: CD9 gene deficiency does not affect smooth muscle cell migration and neointima formation after vascular injury in mice. Thromb Haemost. 83:956–961. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

116 

Erovic BM, Pammer J, Hollemann D, Woegerbauer M, Geleff S, Fischer MB, Burian M, Frommlet F and Neuchrist C: Motility-related protein-1/CD9 expression in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Head Neck. 25:848–857. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

117 

Lagaudrière-Gesbert C, Le Naour F, Lebel-Binay S, Billard M, Lemichez E, Boquet P, Boucheix C, Conjeaud H and Rubinstein E: Functional analysis of four tetraspans, CD9, CD53, CD81, and CD82, suggests a common role in costimulation, cell adhesion, and migration: Only CD9 upregulates HB-EGF activity. Cell Immunol. 182:105–112. 1997. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

118 

Oren R, Takahashi S, Doss C, Levy R and Levy S: TAPA-1, the target of an antiproliferative antibody, defines a new family of transmembrane proteins. Mol Cell Biol. 10:4007–4015. 1990. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

119 

Wice BM and Gordon JI: A tetraspan membrane glycoprotein produced in the human intestinal epithelium and liver that can regulate cell density-dependent proliferation. J Biol Chem. 270:21907–21918. 1995. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

120 

Buim ME, Lourenço SV, Carvalho KC, Cardim R, Pereira C, Carvalho AL, Fregnani JH and Soares FA: Downregulation of CD9 protein expression is associated with aggressive behavior of oral squamous cell carcinoma. Oral Oncol. 46:166–171. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

121 

Huang CI, Kohno N, Ogawa E, Adachi M, Taki T and Miyake M: Correlation of reduction in MRP-1/CD9 and KAI1/CD82 expression with recurrences in breast cancer patients. Am J Pathol. 153:973–983. 1998. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

122 

Mhawech P, Herrmann F, Coassin M, Guillou L and Iselin CE: Motility-related protein 1 (MRP-1/CD9) expression in urothelial bladder carcinoma and its relation to tumor recurrence and progression. Cancer. 98:1649–1657. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

123 

Sauer G, Windisch J, Kurzeder C, Heilmann V, Kreienberg R and Deissler H: Progression of cervical carcinomas is associated with down-regulation of CD9 but strong local re-expression at sites of transendothelial invasion. Clin Cancer Res. 9:6426–6431. 2003.PubMed/NCBI

124 

Kusukawa J, Ryu F, Kameyama T and Mekada E: Reduced expression of CD9 in oral squamous cell carcinoma: CD9 expression inversely related to high prevalence of lymph node metastasis. J Oral Pathol Med. 30:73–79. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

125 

Zhang BH, Liu W, Li L, Lu JG, Sun YN, Jin DJ and Xu XY: KAI1/CD82 and MRP1/CD9 serve as markers of infiltration, metastasis, and prognosis in laryngeal squamous cell carcinomas. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 14:3521–3526. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

126 

Miyake M, Koyama M, Seno M and Ikeyama S: Identification of the motility-related protein (MRP-1), recognized by monoclonal antibody M31-15, which inhibits cell motility. J Exp Med. 174:1347–1354. 1991. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

127 

Ikeyama S, Koyama M, Yamaoko M, Sasada R and Miyake M: Suppression of cell motility and metastasis by transfection with human motility-related protein (MRP-1/CD9) DNA. J Exp Med. 177:1231–1237. 1993. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

128 

Uchida S, Shimada Y, Watanabe G, Li ZG, Hong T, Miyake M and Imamura M: Motility-related protein (MRP-1/CD9) and KAI1/CD82 expression inversely correlate with lymph node metastasis in oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Br J Cancer. 79:1168–1173. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

129 

Higashiyama S, Iwamoto R, Goishi K, Raab G, Taniguchi N, Klagsbrun M and Mekada E: The membrane protein CD9/DRAP 27 potentiates the juxtacrine growth factor activity of the membrane-anchored heparin-binding EGF-like growth factor. J Cell Biol. 128:929–938. 1995. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

130 

Nakamura K, Iwamoto R and Mekada E: Membrane-anchored heparin-binding EGF-like growth factor (HB-EGF) and diphtheria toxin receptor-associated protein (DRAP27)/CD9 form a complex with integrin alpha 3 beta 1 at cell-cell contact sites. J Cell Biol. 129:1691–1705. 1995. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

131 

Hato T, Ikeda K, Yasukawa M, Watanabe A and Kobayashi Y: Exposure of platelet fibrinogen receptors by a monoclonal antibody to CD9 antigen. Blood. 72:224–229. 1988. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

132 

Higashihara M, Takahata K, Yatomi Y, Nakahara K and Kurokawa K: Purification and partial characterization of CD9 antigen of human platelets. FEBS Lett. 264:270–274. 1990. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

133 

Hirano C, Nagata M, Noman AA, Kitamura N, Ohnishi M, Ohyama T, Kobayashi T, Suzuki K, Yoshizawa M, Izumi N, et al: Tetraspanin gene expression levels as potential biomarkers for malignancy of gingival squamous cell carcinoma. Int J Cancer. 124:2911–2916. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

134 

Nagata M, Fujita H, Ida H, Hoshina H, Inoue T, Seki Y, Ohnishi M, Ohyama T, Shingaki S, Kaji M, et al: Identification of potential biomarkers of lymph node metastasis in oral squamous cell carcinoma by cDNA microarray analysis. Int J Cancer. 106:683–689. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

135 

Kurokawa A, Nagata M, Kitamura N, Noman AA, Ohnishi M, Ohyama T, Kobayashi T, Shingaki S and Takagi R; Oral, Maxillofacial Pathology, Surgery Group, : Diagnostic value of integrin alpha3, beta4, and beta5 gene expression levels for the clinical outcome of tongue squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer. 112:1272–1281. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

136 

Sugiura T and Berditchevski F: Function of alpha3beta1-tetraspanin protein complexes in tumor cell invasion. Evidence for the role of the complexes in production of matrix metalloproteinase 2 (MMP-2). J Cell Biol. 146:1375–1389. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

137 

Huang CL, Ueno M, Liu D, Masuya D, Nakano J, Yokomise H, Nakagawa T and Miyake M: MRP-1/CD9 gene transduction regulates the actin cytoskeleton through the downregulation of WAVE2. Oncogene. 25:6480–6488. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

138 

Kim T, Kim Y and Kwon HJ: Expression of CD9 and CD82 in papillary thyroid microcarcinoma and its prognostic significance. Endokrynol Pol. 70:224–231. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

139 

Murayama Y, Oritani K and Tsutsui S: Novel CD9-targeted therapies in gastric cancer. World J Gastroenterol. 21:3206–3213. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

140 

Murayama Y, Shinomura Y, Oritani K, Miyagawa JI, Yoshida H, Nishida M, Katsube F, Shiraga M, Miyazaki T, Nakamoto T, et al: The tetraspanin CD9 modulates epidermal growth factor receptor signaling in cancer cells. J Cell Physiol. 216:135–143. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

141 

Wang GP and Han XF: CD9 modulates proliferation of human glioblastoma cells via epidermal growth factor receptor signaling. Mol Med Re. 12:1381–1386. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

142 

Halova I, Dráberová L, Bambousková M, Machyna M, Stegurová L, Smrž D and Dráber P: Cross-talk between tetraspanin CD9 and transmembrane adaptor protein non-T cell activation linker (NTAL) in mast cell activation and chemotaxis. J Biol Chem. 288:9801–9814. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

143 

Huang CL, Liu D, Masuya D, Kameyama K, Nakashima T, Yokomise H, Ueno M and Miyake M: MRP-1/CD9 gene transduction downregulates Wnt signal pathways. Oncogene. 23:7475–7483. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

144 

Podergajs N, Motaln H, Rajčević U, Verbovšek U, Koršič M, Obad N, Espedal H, Vittori M, Herold-Mende C, Miletic H, et al: Transmembrane protein CD9 is glioblastoma biomarker, relevant for maintenance of glioblastoma stem cells. Oncotarget. 7:593–609. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

145 

Higashiyama M, Taki T, Ieki Y, Adachi M, Huang CL, Koh T, Kodama K, Doi O and Miyake M: Reduced motility related protein-1 (MRP-1/CD9) gene expression as a factor of poor prognosis in non-small cell lung cancer. Cancer Res. 55:6040–6044. 1995.PubMed/NCBI

146 

Shi Y, Zhou W, Cheng L, Chen C, Huang Z, Fang X, Wu Q, He Z, Xu S, Lathia JD, et al: Tetraspanin CD9 stabilizes gp130 by preventing its ubiquitin-dependent lysosomal degradation to promote STAT3 activation in glioma stem cells. Cell Death Differ. 24:167–180. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

147 

Funakoshi T, Tachibana I, Hoshida Y, Kimura H, Takeda Y, Kijima T, Nishino K, Goto H, Yoneda T, Kumagai T, et al: Expression of tetraspanins in human lung cancer cells: Frequent downregulation of CD9 and its contribution to cell motility in small cell lung cancer. Oncogene. 22:674–687. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

148 

Yang H, Shen C, Zhang B, Chen H, Chen Z and Chen J: Expression and clinicopathological significance of CD9 in gastrointestinal stromal tumor. J Korean Med Sci. 28:1443–1448. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

149 

Imhof I, Gasper WJ and Derynck R: Association of tetraspanin CD9 with transmembrane TGF{alpha} confers alterations in cell-surface presentation of TGF{alpha} and cytoskeletal organization. J Cell Sci. 121:2265–2274. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

150 

Saito Y, Tachibana I, Takeda Y, Yamane H, He P, Suzuki M, Minami S, Kijima T, Yoshida M, Kumagai T, et al: Absence of CD9 enhances adhesion-dependent morphologic differentiation, survival, and matrix metalloproteinase-2 production in small cell lung cancer cells. Cancer Res. 66:9557–9565. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

151 

Hashida H, Takabayashi A, Tokuhara T, Hattori N, Taki T, Hasegawa H, Satoh S, Kobayashi N, Yamaoka Y and Miyake M: Clinical significance of transmembrane 4 superfamily in colon cancer. Br J Cancer. 89:158–167. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

152 

Ono M, Handa K, Withers DA and Hakomori SI: Motility inhibition and apoptosis are induced by metastasis-suppressing gene product CD82 and its analogue CD9, with concurrent glycosylation. Cancer Res. 59:2335–2339. 1999.PubMed/NCBI

153 

Yauch RL, Berditchevski F, Harler MB, Reichner J and Hemler ME: Highly stoichiometric, stable, and specific association of integrin alpha3beta1 with CD151 provides a major link to phosphatidylinositol 4-kinase, and may regulate cell migration. Mol Biol Cell. 9:2751–2765. 1998. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

154 

Hemler ME, Mannion BA and Barditchevski F: Association of TM4SF proteins with integrins: Relevance to cancer. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1287:67–71. 1996.PubMed/NCBI

155 

Berditchevski F and Odintsova E: Characterization of integrin-tetraspanin adhesion complexes: Role of tetraspanins in integrin signaling. J Cell Biol. 146:477–492. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Related Articles

Journal Cover

May-2022
Volume 47 Issue 5

Print ISSN: 1021-335X
Online ISSN:1791-2431

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
P.C. S, Shetty SS, Nalilu SK, Shetty PK and Patil P: Tetraspanin CD9: A friend or foe of head and neck cancer (Review). Oncol Rep 47: 88, 2022
APA
P.C., S., Shetty, S.S., Nalilu, S.K., Shetty, P.K., & Patil, P. (2022). Tetraspanin CD9: A friend or foe of head and neck cancer (Review). Oncology Reports, 47, 88. https://doi.org/10.3892/or.2022.8299
MLA
P.C., S., Shetty, S. S., Nalilu, S. K., Shetty, P. K., Patil, P."Tetraspanin CD9: A friend or foe of head and neck cancer (Review)". Oncology Reports 47.5 (2022): 88.
Chicago
P.C., S., Shetty, S. S., Nalilu, S. K., Shetty, P. K., Patil, P."Tetraspanin CD9: A friend or foe of head and neck cancer (Review)". Oncology Reports 47, no. 5 (2022): 88. https://doi.org/10.3892/or.2022.8299