International Journal of Molecular Medicine is an international journal devoted to molecular mechanisms of human disease.
International Journal of Oncology is an international journal devoted to oncology research and cancer treatment.
Covers molecular medicine topics such as pharmacology, pathology, genetics, neuroscience, infectious diseases, molecular cardiology, and molecular surgery.
Oncology Reports is an international journal devoted to fundamental and applied research in Oncology.
Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine is an international journal devoted to laboratory and clinical medicine.
Oncology Letters is an international journal devoted to Experimental and Clinical Oncology.
Explores a wide range of biological and medical fields, including pharmacology, genetics, microbiology, neuroscience, and molecular cardiology.
International journal addressing all aspects of oncology research, from tumorigenesis and oncogenes to chemotherapy and metastasis.
Multidisciplinary open-access journal spanning biochemistry, genetics, neuroscience, environmental health, and synthetic biology.
Open-access journal combining biochemistry, pharmacology, immunology, and genetics to advance health through functional nutrition.
Publishes open-access research on using epigenetics to advance understanding and treatment of human disease.
An International Open Access Journal Devoted to General Medicine.
Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is the most aggressive subtype of breast cancer, defined by the lack of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) expression in tumor cells. It is characterized by a more aggressive growth pattern and more enhanced metastatic potential than other subtypes. Despite advancements in breast cancer therapeutics that have contributed to improved mortality rates, patients with TNBC continue to face substantial clinical challenges as they are generally ineligible for existing targeted therapies (1).
HSP90 is frequently upregulated in cancer, with expression levels reported to be 2- to 10-fold higher than those in normal tissues (2). In breast cancer, its overexpression correlates with adverse clinicopathological features, including larger tumor size, higher nuclear grade, and poor prognosis, particularly in early stage disease (3). Functionally, HSP90 acts as a molecular chaperone that supports the folding and stability of more than 200 target proteins involved in oncogenic processes such as cellular proliferation, resistance to apoptosis, angiogenesis and metastatic progression (4). HSP90 drives tumor progression and therapy resistance by sustaining pro-survival signaling pathways, such as JAK/STAT3, AKT and MEK (5,6). Given its central role in sustaining oncogenic signaling, HSP90 has emerged as a compelling therapeutic target for TNBC. Therefore, pharmacological inhibition of HSP90 offers a promising strategy for simultaneously disrupting multiple oncogenic pathways in this aggressive breast cancer subtype (7).
Emerging evidence has emphasized the key role of cancer stem cells (CSCs) in tumor initiation, invasion and metastasis, particularly in TNBC, where they drive chemoresistance and metastasis, leading to treatment failure (8). Previous studies have reported that HSP90 and its co-chaperones are highly implicated in the maintenance of the CSC phenotype, expression of EMT-related genes, and stability of pluripotent transcription factors such as Nanog and Oct4 (9–12). Targeting HSP90 not only disrupts pro-survival signaling pathways but also impairs the maintenance of the CSC phenotype, thereby reducing chemoresistance and metastatic potential, and highlighting its dual role as a promising therapeutic target in TNBC management.
HSP90 comprises three domains: A N-terminal domain (NTD) containing an ATP-binding pocket, a middle domain (MD), and a C-terminal domain (CTD) required for dimerization (13). Most HSP90 inhibitors in clinical trials target the N-terminus, but none have received FDA approval owing to serious issues arising from the induction of the heat shock response (HSR), off-target effects, and organ toxicity (14,15). NCT-58, a C-terminal HSP90 inhibitor that interferes with the binding of ATP to its CTD, was developed. NCT-58 is one of 90 synthesized O-substituted analogs of the B- and C-ring-truncated scaffolds of deguelin, a naturally occurring rotenoid. It was observed that NCT-58 exerted antitumor activity in HER2-positive breast cancer cells by downregulating HER2 and inducing apoptosis (16). In the present study, the mechanism underlying the novel effects of NCT-58 on apoptosis, breast cancer stem cells (BCSC)-like properties, and cell migration in TNBC cells, was explored. Furthermore, the potential of NCT-58 combined with paclitaxel or doxorubicin was evaluated, and its potential as a multifaceted therapeutic strategy for TNBC was highlighted.
NCT-58 was synthesized according to a previously established protocol (17). For all experiments, NCT-58 was prepared as a stock solution (10 mM) in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) and vehicle controls contained the corresponding final concentration of DMSO (0.1% v/v). Chemicals, including propidium iodide (PI), DMSO and Triton X-100, were purchased from MilliporeSigma. Protease and phosphatase inhibitor tablets were obtained from Roche Applied Science. The primary antibodies used for western blotting and immunocytochemistry were specific to vimentin, STAT3, phospho-STAT3 (Tyr705), AKT, phospho-AKT (Ser473), MEK, phospho-MEK (Ser218/222), PARP, cleaved PARP, cleaved caspase-3, and −7, heat shock transcription factor-1 (HSF)-1, HSP70, cyclin D1, survivin, F-actin (Texas Red™-X Phalloidin) and GAPDH. Secondary antibodies included horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated anti-mouse and anti-rabbit IgG and Alexa Fluor 488/594-labeled anti-mouse and anti-rabbit IgG.
The TNBC cell lines MDA-MB-231 (PerkinElmer, Inc.), Hs578T (American Type Culture Collection; ATCC), BT549 and 4T1 (Japanese Collection of Research Bioresources Cell Bank), and the cell line 293 (Korean Cell line Bank) were maintained in MEM or RPMI-1640 supplemented with 10% FBS and 100 U/ml penicillin-streptomycin (Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). The normal human mammary epithelial cell line MCF10A (ATCC) was cultured in Mammary Epithelial Cell Growth Basal Medium, including hEGF (20 ng/ml), insulin (10 µg/ml), hydrocortisone (0.5 µg/ml) and bovine pituitary extract (50 µg/ml) (SingleQuotsTM Kit; Lonza Group, Ltd.) containing streptomycin-penicillin (100 U/ml). The cells were then incubated at 37°C in an atmosphere containing 5% CO2.
Cell viability was measured using the CellTiter 96® Aqueous One Solution Cell Proliferation Assay [MTS, 3-(4, 5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-5-(3-carboxymethoxyphenyl)-2-(4-sulfophenyl)-2H-tetrazolium] (Promega Corporation) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The MTS reagent, which is soluble in cell culture medium, was added directly to the cells. The quantity of purple formazan product was determined by measuring the absorbance at 490 nm using a microplate reader (Agilent BioTek 800 TS; Agilent Technologies, Inc.). Percentage cell viability was calculated relative to that of the untreated control (set at 100%). IC50 values were determined by fitting sigmoidal dose-response curves using nonlinear regression analysis in GraphPad Prism 9.0 (Dotmatics).
Cell cycle distribution and sub-G1 populations were analyzed using flow cytometry. Cells were harvested at 70–80% confluence, washed twice with cold phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), and fixed by dropwise addition of pre-chilled 95% ethanol containing 0.5% Tween-20. The samples were then incubated at −20°C overnight to ensure complete fixation. Following fixation, cells were centrifuged (7,160 × g), resuspended in staining buffer containing propidium iodide (50 µg/ml) and RNase A (50 µg/ml), and incubated for 30 min at room temperature in the dark. DNA content was assessed using a Beckman Coulter Expo flow cytometer (Beckman Coulter, Inc.) and data were analyzed using FlowJo software v10.10 (BD Biosciences).
To evaluate ALDH1 enzymatic activity, cells were treated using the Aldefluor™ assay kit (Stemcell Technologies, Inc.) in accordance with the supplier's protocol. Briefly, cells (0.5×106) were suspended in assay buffer containing 1 µM BODIPY-amino-acet-aldehyde and incubated at 37°C for 45 min. Diethyl-amino-benzaldehyde (50 mM) was added to the control sample to inhibit ALDH1 activity and establish gating parameters for the Aldefluor-positive population during flow cytometric analysis. To identify stem-like cell populations exhibiting the CD44high/CD24low phenotype, cells were incubated at 4°C for 30 min with FITC-labeled anti-CD24 and PE-labeled anti-CD44 antibodies (1:50; BD Biosciences). FITC- and PE-conjugated isotype-matched mouse IgG antibodies were used as controls for non-specific staining. The labeled cells were subsequently subjected to flow cytometry.
To assess sphere-forming capacity, 4T1 cells were seeded at a density of 3×105 cells/ml in ultralow attachment plates (Corning, Inc.) and cultured in HuMEC basal serum-free medium (Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.), supplemented with B27 (1:50; Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.), 20 ng/ml basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF; MilliporeSigma), 20 ng/ml mouse epidermal growth factor (EGF, MilliporeSigma), 4 µg/ml heparin, 1% antibiotic-antimycotic solution, and 15 µg/ml gentamycin. The number and volume of mammospheres were determined using an Olympus CKX53 inverted microscope, and the sphere size was quantified using ImageJ software (v1.54; National Institutes of Health). Mammosphere volumes were calculated using the formula: Volume=4/3×3.14×r3.
A C-terminal HSP90α Inhibitor Screening Kit (BPS Bioscience) was used to evaluate inhibition of the interaction between the C-terminal region of HSP90α and its co-chaperone peptidylprolyl isomerase D (PPID) by HSP90 inhibitors, as previously described (11,18). The assay was conducted in 384-well Optiplates (PerkinElmer, Inc.) and luminescence signals were detected using the AlphaScreen® technology on a Varioskan LUX™ microplate reader (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.).
To assess compound binding affinity to the NTD of HSP90α, a fluorescence-based competitive binding assay (HSP90α N-terminal Assay Kit; BPS Bioscience) was conducted in accordance with the manufacturer's guidelines. Test compounds (ranging from 0–1,000 nM in DMSO) were mixed with a reaction solution comprising FITC-tagged geldanamycin (100 nM) and recombinant HSP90α protein (17 ng/µl), followed by incubation at room temperature for 3 h. Fluorescence intensity was then measured at an excitation wavelength of 485 nm and emission at 530 nm using a SpectraMax Gemini EM microplate reader (Molecular Devices, LLC) to assess the binding activity to the NTD of HSP90.
Cells were plated in 96-well ImageLock plates (Essen Bioscience) and grown until they reached ~90% confluency. A uniform wound was created using a 96-pin WoundMaker, followed by washing with PBS to eliminate detached cells. Immediately after scratch formation, cells were exposed to varying concentrations of NCT-58. Cell migration was monitored in real time by capturing images hourly for 25 to 50 h using an IncuCyte ZOOM Live-Cell Imaging System (Essen Bioscience). The progression of wound closure was quantified using the IncuCyte™ Scratch Wound Cell Migration analysis software (Essen BioScience).
Membranes were incubated overnight at 4°C with primary antibodies diluted in 5% bovine serum albumin (BSA) (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.), targeting the following proteins: AKT (1:2,000), phospho-AKT (1:2,000), MEK (1:2,000), phospho-MEK (1:2,000), STAT3 (1:2,000), phospho-STAT3 (Tyr705, 1:2,000), survivin (1:2,000), cyclin D1 (1:2,000), PARP (1:2,000), cleaved PARP (1:2,000), cleaved caspase-3 (1:1,000), cleaved caspase-7 (1:1,000), and GAPDH (1:3,000). After washing, the membranes were incubated with HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies (anti-rabbit or anti-mouse IgG, 1:3,000-1:5,000). Protein bands were visualized using an enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) detection system (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.).
Cells were lysed in radioimmunoprecipitation assay buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 1% NP-40, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate and 0.1% SDS) supplemented with protease and phosphatase inhibitor cocktails (Roche Diagnostics). The lysates were incubated on ice for 30 min and then centrifuged at 25,200 × g for 15 min at 4°C to remove insoluble debris. The supernatant was collected, and protein concentrations were determined using a BCA assay (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). Equal amounts of protein (20 µg per lane) were mixed with the sample buffer, boiled for 10 min, separated using 4–15% gradient SDS-PAGE, and transferred onto PVDF membranes (MilliporeSigma). Membranes were blocked with 5% skim milk for 1 h at room temperature and subsequently incubated overnight at 4°C with primary antibodies diluted in 5% BSA [AKT (1:2,000), phospho-AKT (1:2,000), MEK (1:2,000), phospho-MEK (1:2,000), STAT3 (1:2,000), phospho-STAT3 (Y705; 1:2,000), survivin (1:2,000), cyclin D1 (1:2,000), PARP (1:2,000), cleaved-PARP (1:2,000), cleaved-caspase-3 (1:1,000), cleaved-caspase-7 (1:1,000), and GAPDH (1:3,000)]. The catalog numbers and suppliers of antibodies are included in Table SI. After washing, the membranes were incubated with HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies (1:3,000-1:5,000) for 1 h at room temperature. Protein bands were detected using an Enhanced Chemiluminescence Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.), quantified using AlphaEaseFC software (Alpha Innotech Corporation), and normalized to GAPDH as the internal loading control.
Cells cultured on 8-well chamber slides (BD Biosciences) were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde at 4°C for 2 h, rinsed with PBS, and permeabilized with 0.2% Triton X-100 for 10 min. The cells were then incubated overnight at 4°C with primary antibodies against HSP70 (1:100), HSF-1 (1:100), vimentin (1:200), or F-actin (1:200) diluted in an antibody diluent (Dako; Agilent Technologies, Inc.). After washing, the cells were treated with fluorescence-conjugated secondary antibodies (Alexa Fluor® 488 or 594). Nuclei were counterstained with DAPI (0.4 µg/ml) and mounted using ProLong™ Gold Antifade Reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). Fluorescence images were captured using a Carl Zeiss confocal microscope, and the signal intensity was quantified using the intensity profile tool. Immunofluorescence images were acquired under identical sensitivity settings, including exposure time, laser power, and gain, across the control and treated groups. For the nuclear protein HSF1, nuclei were segmented using DAPI staining in ImageJ. The integrated density of HSF1 within each nucleus was normalized to the integrated density of the corresponding DAPI signal (HSF1/DAPI ratio) to correct for nuclear size and DNA content. For cytoplasmic proteins HSP70, corrected total cell fluorescence (CTCF) was calculated as: CTCF=Integrated density-(Area × Background mean intensity) with background values obtained from four cell-free regions per image. Quantification was performed using at least 10 cells from a minimum of three independent fields per condition.
To evaluate whether two compounds interact synergistically, additively, or antagonistically, the combination index (CI) was determined using CompuSyn® software (ComboSyn, Inc.; http://www.combosyn.com). A CI value of less than, equal to, or greater than 1 denotes synergism, additive effects, or antagonism, respectively. The fraction affected (Fa) represents the proportion of phenotypic inhibition resulting from treatment with a compound. Fa=percent inhibition of cell viability/100. The Fa-CI plot was generated for each group treated with more than one compound, and the corresponding heat map illustrated the percentage inhibition of cell viability under the combination conditions. The CI values at specific effect levels were then used to construct isobolograms, where data points below, on, or above the line of additivity indicated synergistic, additive, or antagonistic effects, respectively.
In silico molecular docking was conducted using open-access AutoDock Vina-based platforms including DockThor (https://www.dockthor.lncc.br) and CB-Dock2 (https://cadd.labshare.cn/cb-dock2). Upon completion of the docking simulations, both 2D and 3D structures of the protein-ligand complexes were visualized and analyzed using UCSF Chimera 1.16 and BIOVIA Discovery Studio 2021. The predicted binding affinity for the interaction between NCT-58 and the CTD of hHSP90α (PDB ID: 7RY1) was estimated to be-9.5 kcal/mol. The binding site and key interactions were analyzed to identify hydrogen bonds, hydrophobic contacts, and the overall binding pocket conformation.
Statistical analyses were performed using the GraphPad Prism 9.0 (GraphPad Software; Dotmatics). Data are presented as the mean ± SEM from at least three independent experiments. Comparisons between groups were conducted using unpaired Student's t-test or one-/two-way ANOVA, as appropriate. For two-way ANOVA, Bonferroni's post-hoc test was used to evaluate multiple comparisons. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.
The anti-proliferative effect of NCT-58 in the human TNBC cell lines MDA-MB-231, BT549 and Hs578T, and the murine mammary carcinoma line 4T1, were first evaluated. TNBC cell viability was dose-dependently reduced in the presence of NCT-58 (0–20 µM, 72 h) in vitro (P<0.05; Figs. 1A and S1; Table SII). The estimated IC50 values for NCT-58 were 6.701, 4.685, 7.041 and 2.922 µM in MDA-MB-231, BT549, Hs578T and 4T1, respectively. Based on IC50 values, a concentration range of 2–10 µM in MDA-MB-231 and 1–5 µM in 4T1 cells was selected for further experiments including apoptosis, western blot analysis, and cancer stem cell-like characterization. Apoptosis was significantly increased in the presence of NCT-58 at 5 µM in MDA-MB-231 cells and at 2 µM in 4T1 cells (P<0.05; Fig. 1B) for 72 h, as evidenced by increased sub-G1 accumulation. Apoptosis induction was confirmed using caspase-3 and caspase-7 activation, concomitant with increased cleavage of PARP, a downstream substrate of caspase-3 (P<0.01; Fig. 1C). Further quantitative analysis confirmed an increased ratio of cleaved to total forms of caspase-3, caspase-7 and PARP following NCT-58 treatment (P<0.05; Fig. S2A-C).
The C-terminal HSP90 binding activity of NCT-58 was analyzed using the co-chaperone peptidylprolyl isomerase D (PPID), which exhibits high-affinity ligand binding activity to the C-terminus of HSP90. NCT-58 significantly inhibited C-terminal HSP90 activity, as evidenced by the marked inhibition of the specific interaction between PPID and the C-terminus of HSP90 (P<0.001; Fig. 1D). Similar results were observed for novobiocin, a potent C-terminal HSP90 inhibitor (19), whereas geldanamycin did not affect this interaction. Furthermore, the competitive HSP90 binding assay with fluorescence-labeled geldanamycin did not show N-terminal HSP90 binding activity of NCT-58 (Fig. 1E). Docking studies using the crystal structure of HSP90 (PDB ID: 7RY1), which includes the middle and CTD, revealed that NCT-58 precisely fits into the dimerization interface of the CTD, which is a critical region required for chaperone function (Fig. 1F). The interaction between NCT-58 and the HSP90 CTD was extensively stabilized by five hydrogen bonds with the key residues Thr495, Gln501, Ser674, Gly675 and Phe676. In addition, a π-anion interaction was observed between NCT-58 and Glu497 of HSP90, further enhancing binding stability (Fig. 1G). These findings highlight how NCT-58 specifically occupies the CTD binding pocket to disrupt dimerization and impair HSP90 function.
Subsequently, it was assessed whether NCT-58 induces the HSR, a limitation of classical N-terminal HSP90 inhibitors. Geldanamycin, the first and most extensively studied N-terminal HSP90 inhibitor, was selected as the reference compound and was used in all experiments requiring an N-terminal HSP90 inhibitor (20,21). The N-terminal HSP90 inhibitor induces the phosphorylation and trimerization of heat shock factor-1 (HSF-1), promoting its nuclear translocation and subsequent upregulation of heat shock proteins (HSPs), such as HSP70 and HSP90, which support pro-survival signaling (15,22). MDA-MB-231 cells were treated with geldanamycin (300 nM), a potent N-terminal HSP90 ATP binding inhibitor, and NCT-58 (300 nM and 10 µM), followed by the assessment of HSF-1 and HSP70 expression. Confocal imaging and intensity analysis revealed no increase in HSF-1 levels upon exposure to NCT-58, whereas geldanamycin considerably increased the accumulation of HSF-1 in the nuclei of MDA-MB-231 cells (Fig. 1H). This finding was further supported by the fact that geldanamycin induced the subsequent upregulation of cytoplasmic HSP70, whereas NCT-58 did not elicit this phenomenon (Fig. 1I).
Accumulating preclinical and clinical evidence has highlighted the significant off-target toxicity of geldanamycin derivatives, which causes undesirable effects in normal tissues (23). Notably, NCT-58 exhibited minimal cytotoxicity at 10 µM in normal mammary gland epithelial MCF10A cells and 293 cells, while geldanamycin caused significant cytotoxicity in both normal cell lines at 100 nM, a 1,000-fold lower concentration (P<0.001; Fig. 1J and K).
It was observed that NCT-58 significantly downregulated the expression of AKT and MEK and reduced their phosphorylation in MDA-MB-231 and 4T1 cells (P<0.05; Fig. 2A and B; Fig. S3A-F), suggesting that the simultaneous inhibition of these two major survival pathways could enhance the antiproliferative effect against TNBC cells.
STAT3 is activated by phosphorylation of its tyrosine residue (Tyr705) in response to stimulation by cytokines and growth factor receptors, and then translocates to the nucleus to promote the expression of survival factors such as cyclin D1, survivin, Bcl-2 and Bcl-xL (24). Therefore, inhibition of HSP90 may suppress the expression of several oncoproteins promoted by STAT3. It was observed that NCT-58 significantly impaired the expression and phosphorylation at Tyr705 of STAT3 in MDA-MB-231 and 4T1 cells, accompanied by the downregulation of survivin and cyclin D1 (P<0.01; Fig. 2C and D).
BCSCs confer resistance to chemotherapy during TNBC treatment and are thought to be a prerequisite for invasion and metastasis (8). It was examined whether NCT-58 affects BCSC-like properties, ALDH1 activity, CD44high/CD24low stem-like populations, and mammosphere formation. Treatment with NCT-58 significantly suppressed ALDH1 activity in MDA-MB-231 (P<0.01; Fig. 3A) and 4T1 cells (P<0.01; Fig. 3B). The CD44high/CD24low phenotype is associated with a higher incidence of relapse or distant metastasis (25). A significant reduction in the CD44high/CD24low-population was observed in MDA-MB-231 cells after NCT-58 challenge (P<0.001; Fig. 3C). Mammosphere 3D culture is a useful tool for assessing the tumor-like properties of BCSCs capable of propagating mammary and progenitor cells in vitro (26,27). The assay revealed that NCT-58 attenuated the mammosphere-forming ability, as evidenced by significant reductions in the number and volume of mammospheres derived from 4T1 cells (P<0.001; Fig. 3D).
Actin and vimentin are major HSP90 target proteins and cytoskeletal components that play important roles in cell interaction, motility, invasiveness and adhesion (13,28). Vimentin intermediate filament is a hallmark of EMT, and appears to be involved in TNBC metastasis (29). To explore whether NCT-58 affected the expression of HSP90 target cytoskeletons, the spatial distribution of vimentin and filamentous-actin was observed using immunofluorescence analysis. NCT-58 treatment resulted in vimentin and F-actin reorganization and the disruption of filament networks, resulting in concomitant cytoplasmic contraction and cellular rounding (Fig. 3E and F). Kinetic analysis of cell migration revealed that NCT-58 significantly and dose-dependently reduced the migration of both MDA-MB-231 and 4T1 cells in vitro (P<0.05; Fig. 3G and H), indicating that the collapse of filament dynamics may contribute to the suppression of migratory ability.
It was investigated whether NCT-58 could enhance the sensitivity of cells to the conventional chemotherapeutic agents paclitaxel and doxorubicin. To assess the synergistic effects of NCT-58 on paclitaxel- or doxorubicin-induced suppression of cell viability, MDA-MB-231 cells were treated with NCT-58 (0–20 µM) combined with paclitaxel (0–2 µM) or doxorubicin (0–3 µM) for 72 h. The interaction between NCT-58 and paclitaxel or doxorubicin was evaluated by isobologram analysis, which uses a graphical representation (isobole) to assess drug effects. Additive interactions are represented as points along the line connecting the effective concentration 50 (EC50) values of each drug, whereas the co-treatment of NCT-58 with paclitaxel or doxorubicin demonstrated synergistic effects, as indicated by points positioned below the isobole (Fig. 4A and D). The heat map intensity represents the relative cell viability of drug combination effects compared with the control treatment with DMSO alone (Fig. 4B and E). The CI further confirmed these synergistic interactions, highlighting the potential of NCT-58 to enhance the efficacy of conventional cytotoxic agents (Fig. 4C and F).
In the present study, it was demonstrated that NCT-58, a C-terminal HSP90 inhibitor, exerts multifaceted antitumor effects in TNBC. Classical HSP90 inhibitors have not been successful owing to concerns regarding off-target toxicity and the induction of HSR, which leads to cytoprotective responses (14,15). N-terminal HSP90 inhibitors trigger HSF-1 activation and translocation into the nucleus, resulting in elevated transcription of HSPs such as HSP70 and HSP90, which promote pro-survival signaling (15,22). NCT-58 effectively suppressed cell viability and induced apoptosis without triggering the HSR, which is a major limitation of current HSP90 inhibitors. Although geldanamycin, a N-terminal HSP90 inhibitor, markedly induced HSF-1 nuclear translocation and the subsequent upregulation of HSP70, NCT-58 did not produce these effects. This finding suggests that inhibiting the CTD prevents a key pitfall of numerous existing HSP90 inhibitors, namely the cytoprotective feedback loop, which diminishes therapeutic efficacy and enhances cytotoxicity in normal cells. The present data revealed the minimal cytotoxic effects of NCT-58 in normal mammary epithelial (MCF10A) and 293 cells, whereas geldanamycin significantly suppressed cell viability at considerably lower concentrations.
Mechanistically, NCT-58 simultaneously disrupted the functions of multiple HSP90 client proteins. By blocking HSP90 C-terminal dimerization, NCT-58 caused pronounced downregulation of AKT, MEK and STAT3, which are the major pro-survival pathways in TNBC. Previous genomic profiling revealed STAT3 overexpression and aberrant activation in TNBC, highlighting its potential as both a molecular target and biomarker (24,30). STAT3 inhibition is associated with reduced transcription of critical survival genes such as survivin and cyclin D1. Consistent with this observation, NCT-58 treatment decreased STAT3 activation and its downstream targets, thereby enhancing apoptosis and diminishing proliferative capacity. A particularly notable finding was the ability of NCT-58 to target the CSC-like properties of TNBC cells. The CSC subpopulation, typically characterized by elevated ALDH1 activity and a CD44high/CD24low phenotype, plays a pivotal role in tumor initiation and recurrence (27,31). These cells exhibit robust self-renewal abilities and multipotency, which contribute to their resistance to conventional chemotherapy and radiotherapy (32). ALDH is a detoxifying enzyme and its ability to convert retinol to retinoic acid is implicated in cancer cell proliferation and CSC differentiation (33). Cyclophosphamide, a commonly used chemotherapy agent for TNBC, undergoes inactivation through ALDH-mediated oxidation during its metabolic process (34,35). Consequently, patients with elevated ALDH expression often experience relatively poor clinical outcomes and exhibit resistance to alkylating agents such as cyclophosphamide and ifosfamide (31,35,36). Therefore, strategies targeting ALDH activity show significant promise for the effective eradication of CSCs and the prevention of chemoresistance and recurrence. Treatment with NCT-58 significantly reduced ALDH1 activity and decreased the percentage of CD44high/CD24low cells, ultimately impairing mammosphere formation in 3D culture. These data align with those of previous reports implicating HSP90 in the maintenance of CSC phenotypes and highlight the importance of targeting CSCs to minimize relapse and metastasis. Accordingly, the 4T1 cell line was employed, which exhibits highly aggressive and stem cell-like characteristics, and is widely recognized as a preclinical model for evaluating cancer stemness and metastatic potential (37–39). In the in vitro experiments of the present study, 4T1 cells clearly demonstrated that NCT-58 reduces CSC-related traits such as ALDH1 activity, thereby supporting the results observed in human MDA-MB-231 cells. By simultaneously affecting both bulk tumor cells and CSC-like populations, NCT-58 can potentially overcome the major mechanisms of resistance in TNBC.
NCT-58 also inhibited cell migration, likely by modulating the HSP90 client proteins, vimentin and F-actin. During EMT, vimentin orchestrates cytoskeletal organization and cell-matrix interactions, enabling cancer cells to remodel the extracellular matrix and adopt a more flexible and invasive phenotype (40). Consequently, vimentin-enriched cells are more elastic and motile, facilitating tissue invasion, vascular or lymphatic entry, and survival under mechanical stress (41,42). By disrupting vimentin and F-actin filament dynamics, NCT-58 induced cytoskeletal reorganization and collapse, thereby reducing the migratory capacity of TNBC cells.
In a previous investigation by the authors, it was demonstrated that NCT-58 overcomes trastuzumab resistance in HER2-positive breast cancer by destabilizing HER2 family proteins, including HER2, HER3, Akt and truncated p95HER2. Moreover, NCT-58 downregulated the RAS/RAF/MEK/ERK pathway, thereby impairing downstream oncogenic signaling (16). These findings established NCT-58 as a promising therapeutic option for trastuzumab-resistant HER2-positive disease. In the present study, these observations were extended to TNBC, and it was shown that NCT-58 suppresses multiple HSP90 client proteins such as AKT, MEK and STAT3, leading to impaired pro-survival signaling, reduced cancer stem-like traits, and diminished migratory potential. Notably, distinct HSP90 client proteins are expressed depending on the breast cancer subtype (43,44). By targeting HSP90, NCT-58 can modulate these subtype-specific proteins and thereby block the oncogenic pathways that drive tumor growth in a subtype-specific manner. Collectively, the results of the present study highlight NCT-58 as a versatile therapeutic strategy with efficacy across different breast cancer subtypes.
Conventional treatments for TNBC are typically dependent on anthracyclines and taxanes. In recent years, immunotherapies and antibody-drug conjugates have broadened therapeutic options, prompting the latest National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines to recommend combining pembrolizumab with chemotherapy in PD-L1-positive cases (combined positive score ≥10). Sacituzumab-govitecan (SC) is an additional treatment option for advanced TNBC following first-line treatment failure (45). However, these approaches are limited by stringent biomarker requirements, suboptimal patient eligibility rates (~40% only qualify for immunotherapy) (46), and the potential for acquired resistance or cost-ineffectiveness (47). For instance, TNBC cells exposed to SC can eventually develop resistance by altering both the antibody target and toxic payload (48). Consequently, achieving sustained therapeutic efficacy in TNBC remains a significant clinical challenge.
Combination regimens are often required to address the heterogeneity of TNBC and forestall the emergence of drug resistance. NCT-58 exhibited synergistic anti-proliferative effects when co-administered with paclitaxel or doxorubicin, two foundational chemotherapeutic agents frequently used in TNBC. CI analysis confirmed this synergy, suggesting that the simultaneous disruption of HSP90 client protein function by NCT-58 may sensitize TNBC cells to cytotoxic agents.
Overall, the findings of the present study suggested that NCT-58 is a promising therapeutic candidate for TNBC, targeting both proliferative tumor cells and cancer stem-like populations, while avoiding the limitations of classical HSP90 inhibitors. By targeting key oncogenic pathways, including AKT, MEK and STAT3, NCT-58 significantly compromises cancer cell survival and induces apoptosis. Notably, NCT-58 exhibited minimal cytotoxicity in non-malignant cells, highlighting its favorable therapeutic profile. The present study has certain limitations, as additional in vivo validation is warranted. In particular, investigations using a 4T1-derived syngeneic model will be necessary to further elucidate the effects of NCT-58 on tumor growth, angiogenesis, metastasis, and the tumor microenvironment. Furthermore, comprehensive preclinical studies evaluating long-term toxicity and safety will be essential prior to clinical application in TNBC patients. Finally, NCT-58 enhances the anticancer efficacy of standard chemotherapeutic agents such as paclitaxel and doxorubicin in a synergistic manner, highlighting its potential as a potent and well-tolerated treatment option for TNBC.
Not applicable.
The present study was supported by the Korea Health Technology R&D Project through the Korea Health Industry Development Institute, funded by the Ministry of Health and Welfare, Republic of Korea (grant nos. HA17C0053 and HR20C0021); the National Research Foundation funded by the Korean government (grant nos. 2021R1A2C2009723, 2023R1A2C3004010, RS-2024-00342677, RS-2025-02634306 and RS-2025-00558356); the Korea University Guro Hospital (grant no. O2411391) and the Brain Korea 21 Plus Program.
The data generated in the present study are included in the figures and/or tables of this article.
EJ, KL, JL, YJK, JYK and JHS conceived and designed the experiments. SJ, EJ, SP, KL, EO, DK, YJK and JYK performed the experiments. EJ, SJ, KL, SP, MP, DK, SK, YKK, KDN, YJK, LF and JYK analyzed the data. CTN, MTL, and JA synthesized NCT-58. EJ, KL, LF, YJK and JYK wrote the manuscript. EJ, JYK and YJK confirm the authenticity of all the raw data. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
|
Zagami P and Carey LA: Triple negative breast cancer: Pitfalls and progress. NPJ Breast Cancer. 8:952022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Ferrarini M, Heltai S, Zocchi MR and Rugarli C: Unusual expression and localization of heat-shock proteins in human tumor cells. Int J Cancer. 51:613–619. 1992. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Pick E, Kluger Y, Giltnane JM, Moeder C, Camp RL, Rimm DL and Kluger HM: High HSP90 expression is associated with decreased survival in breast cancer. Cancer Res. 67:2932–2937. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Isaacs JS, Xu W and Neckers L: Heat shock protein 90 as a molecular target for cancer therapeutics. Cancer Cell. 3:213–217. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Bocchini CE, Kasembeli MM, Roh SH and Tweardy DJ: Contribution of chaperones to STAT pathway signaling. JAKSTAT. 3:e9704592014.PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Streicher JM: The role of heat shock proteins in regulating receptor signal transduction. Mol Pharmacol. 95:468–474. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Edkins AL: Hsp90 co-chaperones as drug targets in cancer: Current perspectives. Heat Shock Protein Inhibitors. McAlpine S and Edkins A: Topics in Medicinal Chemistry, 19. Springer; Cham: pp. 21–54. 2016, View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Collina F, Di Bonito M, Li Bergolis V, De Laurentiis M, Vitagliano C, Cerrone M, Nuzzo F, Cantile M and Botti G: Prognostic value of cancer stem cells markers in triple-negative breast cancer. Biomed Res Int. 2015:1586822015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Kabakov A, Yakimova A and Matchuk O: Molecular chaperones in cancer stem cells: Determinants of stemness and potential targets for antitumor therapy. Cells. 9:8922020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Cho TM, Kim JY, Kim YJ, Sung D, Oh E, Jang S, Farrand L, Hoang VH, Nguyen CT, Ann J, et al: C-terminal HSP90 inhibitor L80 elicits anti-metastatic effects in triple-negative breast cancer via STAT3 inhibition. Cancer Lett. 447:141–153. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Park JM, Kim YJ, Park S, Park M, Farrand L, Nguyen CT, Ann J, Nam G, Park HJ, Lee J, et al: A novel HSP90 inhibitor targeting the C-terminal domain attenuates trastuzumab resistance in HER2-positive breast cancer. Mol Cancer. 19:1612020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Park M, Jung E, Park JM, Park S, Ko D, Seo J, Kim S, Nam KD, Kang YK, Farrand L, et al: The HSP90 inhibitor HVH-2930 exhibits potent efficacy against trastuzumab-resistant HER2-positive breast cancer. Theranostics. 14:2442–2463. 2024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Hoter A, El-Sabban ME and Naim HY: The HSP90 family: Structure, regulation, function, and implications in health and disease. Int J Mol Sci. 19:25602018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Garcia-Carbonero R, Carnero A and Paz-Ares L: Inhibition of HSP90 molecular chaperones: Moving into the clinic. Lancet Oncol. 14:e358–e369. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Wang Y and McAlpine SR: N-terminal and C-terminal modulation of Hsp90 produce dissimilar phenotypes. Chem Commun (Camb). 51:1410–1413. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Park S, Kim YJ, Park JM, Park M, Nam KD, Farrand L, Nguyen CT, La MT, Ann J, Lee J, et al: The C-terminal HSP90 inhibitor NCT-58 kills trastuzumab-resistant breast cancer stem-like cells. Cell Death Discov. 7:3542021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Nguyen CT, Ann J, Sahu R, Byun WS, Lee S, Nam G, Park HJ, Park S, Kim YJ, Kim JY, et al: Discovery of novel anti-breast cancer agents derived from deguelin as inhibitors of heat shock protein 90 (HSP90). Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 30:1273742020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Kim JY, Cho TM, Park JM, Park S, Park M, Nam KD, Ko D, Seo J, Kim S, Jung E, et al: A novel HSP90 inhibitor SL-145 suppresses metastatic triple-negative breast cancer without triggering the heat shock response. Oncogene. 41:3289–3297. 2022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Donnelly A and Blagg BSJ: Novobiocin and additional inhibitors of the Hsp90 C-terminal nucleotide-binding pocket. Curr Med Chem. 15:2702–2717. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Stebbins CE, Russo AA, Schneider C, Rosen N, Hartl FU and Pavletich NP: Crystal structure of an Hsp90-geldanamycin complex: Targeting of a protein chaperone by an antitumor agent. Cell. 89:239–250. 1997. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Gooljarsingh LT, Fernandes C, Yan K, Zhang H, Grooms M, Johanson K, Sinnamon RH, Kirkpatrick RB, Kerrigan J, Lewis T, et al: A biochemical rationale for the anticancer effects of Hsp90 inhibitors: Slow, tight binding inhibition by geldanamycin and its analogues. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 103:7625–7630. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Wu J, Liu T, Rios Z, Mei Q, Lin X and Cao S: Heat shock proteins and cancer. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 38:226–256. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Neckers L, Blagg B, Haystead T, Trepel JB, Whitesell L and Picard D: Methods to validate Hsp90 inhibitor specificity, to identify off-target effects, and to rethink approaches for further clinical development. Cell Stress Chaperones. 23:467–482. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Qin JJ, Yan L, Zhang J and Zhang WD: STAT3 as a potential therapeutic target in triple negative breast cancer: A systematic review. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 38:1952019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Wang H, Wang L, Song Y, Wang S, Huang X, Xuan Q, Kang X and Zhang Q: CD44+/CD24− phenotype predicts a poor prognosis in triple-negative breast cancer. Oncol Lett. 14:5890–5898. 2017.PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Mani SA, Guo W, Liao MJ, Eaton EN, Ayyanan A, Zhou AY, Brooks M, Reinhard F, Zhang CC, Shipitsin M, et al: The epithelial-mesenchymal transition generates cells with properties of stem cells. Cell. 133:704–715. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Oh E, Kim YJ, An H, Sung D, Cho TM, Farrand L, Jang S, Seo JH and Kim JY: Flubendazole elicits anti-metastatic effects in triple-negative breast cancer via STAT3 inhibition. Int J Cancer. 143:1978–1993. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Zhang MH, Lee JS, Kim HJ, Jin DI, Kim JI, Lee KJ and Seo JS: HSP90 protects apoptotic cleavage of vimentin in geldanamycin-induced apoptosis. Mol Cell Biochem. 281:111–121. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Yamashita N, Tokunaga E, Kitao H, Hisamatsu Y, Taketani K, Akiyoshi S, Okada S, Aishima S, Morita M and Maehara Y: Vimentin as a poor prognostic factor for triple-negative breast cancer. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 139:739–746. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Sirkisoon SR, Carpenter RL, Rimkus T, Anderson A, Harrison A, Lange AM, Jin G, Watabe K and Lo HW: Interaction between STAT3 and GLI1/tGLI1 oncogenic transcription factors promotes the aggressiveness of triple-negative breast cancers and HER2-enriched breast cancer. Oncogene. 37:2502–2514. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Ginestier C, Hur MH, Charafe-Jauffret E, Monville F, Dutcher J, Brown M, Jacquemier J, Viens P, Kleer CG, Liu S, et al: ALDH1 is a marker of normal and malignant human mammary stem cells and a predictor of poor clinical outcome. Cell Stem Cell. 1:555–567. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Wei Y, Li Y, Chen Y, Liu P, Huang S, Zhang Y, Sun Y, Wu Z, Hu M, Wu Q, et al: ALDH1: A potential therapeutic target for cancer stem cells in solid tumors. Front Oncol. 12:10262782022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Clark DW and Palle K: Aldehyde dehydrogenases in cancer stem cells: Potential as therapeutic targets. Ann Transl Med. 4:5182016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Sládek NE: Aldehyde dehydrogenase-mediated cellular relative insensitivity to the oxazaphosphorines. Curr Pharm Des. 5:607–625. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Sladek NE: Metabolism of oxazaphosphorines. Pharmacol Ther. 37:301–355. 1988. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Moreb JS: Aldehyde dehydrogenase as a marker for stem cells. Curr Stem Cell Res Ther. 3:237–246. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Schrörs B, Boegel S, Albrecht C, Bukur T, Bukur V, Holtsträter C, Ritzel C, Manninen K, Tadmor AD, Vormehr M, et al: Multi-omics characterization of the 4T1 murine mammary gland tumor model. Front Oncol. 10:11952020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Herndon ME, Ayers M, Gibson-Corley KN, Wendt MK, Wallrath LL, Henry MD and Stipp CS: The highly metastatic 4T1 breast carcinoma model possesses features of a hybrid epithelial/mesenchymal phenotype. Dis Model Mech. 17:dmm0507712024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Tao K, Fang M, Alroy J and Sahagian GG: Imagable 4T1 model for the study of late stage breast cancer. BMC Cancer. 8:2282008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Satelli A and Li S: Vimentin in cancer and its potential as a molecular target for cancer therapy. Cell Mol Life Sci. 68:3033–3046. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Thiery JP, Acloque H, Huang RYJ and Nieto MA: Epithelial-mesenchymal transitions in development and disease. Cell. 139:871–890. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Lu W and Kang Y: Epithelial-mesenchymal plasticity in cancer progression and metastasis. Dev Cell. 49:361–374. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Zagouri F, Bournakis E, Koutsoukos K and Papadimitriou CA: Heat shock protein 90 (hsp90) expression and breast cancer. Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 5:1008–1020. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Wei H, Zhang Y, Jia Y, Chen X, Niu T, Chatterjee A, He P and Hou G: Heat shock protein 90: Biological functions, diseases, and therapeutic targets. MedComm (2020). 5:e4702024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Gradishar WJ, Moran MS, Abraham J, Abramson V, Aft R, Agnese D, Allison KH, Anderson B, Burstein HJ, Chew H, et al: NCCN guidelines® insights: Breast cancer, version 4.2023. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 21:594–608. 2023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Cortes J, Rugo HS, Cescon DW, Im SA, Yusof MM, Gallardo C, Lipatov O, Barrios CH, Perez-Garcia J, Iwata H, et al: Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy in advanced triple-negative breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 387:217–226. 2022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Xie J, Li S, Li Y and Li J: Cost-effectiveness of sacituzumab govitecan versus chemotherapy in patients with relapsed or refractory metastatic triple-negative breast cancer. BMC Health Serv Res. 23:7062023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Coates JT, Sun S, Leshchiner I, Thimmiah N, Martin EE, McLoughlin D, Danysh BP, Slowik K, Jacobs RA, Rhrissorrakrai K, et al: Parallel genomic alterations of antigen and payload targets mediate polyclonal acquired clinical resistance to sacituzumab govitecan in triple-negative breast cancer. Cancer Discov. 11:2436–2445. 2021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI |