International Journal of Molecular Medicine is an international journal devoted to molecular mechanisms of human disease.
International Journal of Oncology is an international journal devoted to oncology research and cancer treatment.
Covers molecular medicine topics such as pharmacology, pathology, genetics, neuroscience, infectious diseases, molecular cardiology, and molecular surgery.
Oncology Reports is an international journal devoted to fundamental and applied research in Oncology.
Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine is an international journal devoted to laboratory and clinical medicine.
Oncology Letters is an international journal devoted to Experimental and Clinical Oncology.
Explores a wide range of biological and medical fields, including pharmacology, genetics, microbiology, neuroscience, and molecular cardiology.
International journal addressing all aspects of oncology research, from tumorigenesis and oncogenes to chemotherapy and metastasis.
Multidisciplinary open-access journal spanning biochemistry, genetics, neuroscience, environmental health, and synthetic biology.
Open-access journal combining biochemistry, pharmacology, immunology, and genetics to advance health through functional nutrition.
Publishes open-access research on using epigenetics to advance understanding and treatment of human disease.
An International Open Access Journal Devoted to General Medicine.
Mitochondria in T‑cell tumor immunity and tumor therapies targeting mitochondria (Review)
Mitochondria are central to cellular metabolic reprogramming, and their energy metabolism pathways are indispensable for T‑cell activation, proliferation and differentiation. Mitochondrial metabolic reprogramming enhances T‑cell activity and antitumor function. Mitochondrial dynamics, including fusion, fission and transfer, regulate T‑cell tumor immune function by modulating the number, morphology and distribution of mitochondria, which is vital for the antitumor effects of T cells. The release of mitochondrial DNA can activate multiple innate immune signaling pathways, such as cyclic GMP‑AMP synthase‑stimulator of interferon genes, Toll‑like receptor 9, and NOD‑, LRR‑, and pyrin domain‑containing protein 3, serving a complex regulatory role in shaping the tumor immunosuppressive microenvironment and T‑cell antitumor immune responses. Notably, mitochondrial dysfunction is a major driver of tumor initiation and progression. T‑cell mitochondrial metabolic reprogramming, dynamic changes and mitochondrial DNA release all affect the antitumor immunity of tumor‑infiltrating T cells. The present review focuses on the relationship between mitochondria and T‑cell antitumor immune responses, exploring the core role of mitochondria in T‑cell tumor immunity from multiple aspects, including mitochondrial energy metabolism, mitochondrial dynamics and mitochondrial DNA. In addition, the present review examines state‑of‑the‑art research on antitumor therapies targeting mitochondria from multiple perspectives, with the aim of providing a reference for developing mitochondria‑targeted antitumor immunotherapy strategies.
Mitochondria, as highly dynamic organelles with various biological functions within cells (1,2), serve a crucial regulatory role in metabolic regulation and the activation of immune cells (3). As the center of cellular energy metabolism and biosynthesis, mitochondria produce ATP through oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) to maintain cellular energy homeostasis (4). The regulation of mitochondrial dynamics is notably associated with tumor cell proliferation and migration, as well as treatment outcomes (5). Mitochondrial release of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA), mitochondrial reactive oxygen species (mtROS) and metabolites is involved in the regulation of various cellular biological processes, including energy metabolism and immune responses (6). Dynamic changes in mitochondrial fusion and fission affect their metabolic function, and, in turn, the metabolic state regulates the dynamic equilibrium of mitochondria. This bidirectional interaction influences the metabolism and effector functions of T cells (7). mtDNA mutations or damage can affect mitochondrial function, including metabolic efficiency and dynamic behavior, thereby directly impacting T-cell capability (8). In addition, the metabolic state of mitochondria can regulate mitochondrial dynamics and mtDNA through pathways such as mTOR and AMPK (9). Increasing evidence has indicated that mitochondrial dysfunction is associated with the occurrence of various diseases, including autoimmune diseases and tumors (10–12).
To ensure normal mitochondrial structure, function and quantity, cells have evolved a sophisticated mitochondrial quality control system that can repair mildly damaged mitochondria or isolate severely damaged ones through mitochondrial dynamics. This system can actuate mitochondrial degradation and renewal through mitophagy and biogenesis, ultimately maintaining mitochondrial homeostasis to meet cellular metabolic needs (13).
In the tumor microenvironment (TME), tumor cells drive nutrient depletion and excessive production of metabolic byproducts, modulating the metabolic reprogramming of infiltrating immune cells and the activation of related signaling pathways, such as the AMPK signaling axis and the mTOR signaling pathway. These pathways control the polarization of different types of immune cells, inducing metabolic dysregulation that leads to the loss of antitumor immune responses (14,15). Hypoxia and continuous antigen stimulation are common forms of metabolic stress manifested in the TME. Prolonged exposure to low-oxygen conditions induces mitochondrial stress leading to elevated ROS levels (16), which rapidly causes the exhaustion of tumor-infiltrating CD8+ T cells and mitochondrial damage or depolarization (17). This results in the metabolic exhaustion and functional decline of CD8+ tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), facilitating tumor immune evasion (18).
The present review explores the relationship between mitochondria and T-cell antitumor immune responses, investigating the key regulatory roles of mitochondrial dynamics, energy metabolism and mtDNA in tumor occurrence, development and immune evasion. The current review aims to provide a deeper understanding of the regulatory mechanisms by which mitochondria influence T cells during tumor development. Additionally, antitumor interventions targeting mitochondria are discussed, providing a basis for developing mitochondrial-targeted antitumor immunotherapy strategies.
Mitochondria within T cells have complex structures, including an outer membrane, inner membrane, intermembrane space and matrix (19). The outer membrane contains selective ion channels and membrane proteins that regulate intercellular communication (20). The intermembrane space is involved in protein and lipid biosynthesis, and redox regulation. The inner membrane folds to form cristae housing the electron transport chain and respiratory enzyme complexes (21). The matrix is the site of the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle, providing substrates for OXPHOS and regulating various metabolites. In addition to energy supply, mitochondria influence CD8+ T-cell activation, signal transduction and cytotoxicity through regulation of ROS production and calcium ion (Ca2+) balance (22).
The TME refers to the dynamic environment surrounding the tumor, serving as the ‘soil’ for tumor cell proliferation. Tumor cells can control tumor-associated antigen (TAA) expression, enhance the expression of immune checkpoint molecules, secrete immunosuppressive cytokines and accumulate lactic acid metabolites, altering the metabolic status, TAA recognition ability and tumor-killing potency of infiltrating immune cells (23). This creates an immunosuppressive microenvironment favorable for tumor growth and spread.
As the tumor progresses, factors such as reduced oxygen content, increased ROS production, depolarized membrane potential and nutrient deprivation in the TME disrupt T-cell mitochondrial metabolism and impair their function (24–26), manifesting as poor mitochondrial adaptability, reduced abundance, decreased or lost membrane potential, dynamic imbalance, reduced cristae number, and disordered shape and arrangement. These factors can lead to dysfunction of the TCA cycle and OXPHOS, electron transport chain dysfunction decreased ATP synthesis efficiency and excessive ROS production (27). However, mitophagy, as a core mechanism of mitochondrial quality control, promptly removes dysfunctional mitochondria, preventing excessive ROS accumulation, mtDNA leakage and T-cell apoptosis, while maintaining OXPHOS efficiency through mitochondrial renewal, thereby providing ATP for T-cell proliferation and effector functions (28,29).
As the energy and metabolic centers of the cell, mitochondria provide energy through regulating metabolic pathways such as the TCA cycle, OXPHOS and fatty acid oxidation (FAO). Mitochondrial metabolism supplies sufficient ATP to meet the energy demands of cell division and growth. Furthermore, biosynthetic precursor substances produced by glycolysis and fatty acid synthesis (FAS), such as glucose-6-phosphate and pyruvate, are used for the synthesis of nucleic acids, proteins and lipids (30).
During T-cell activation and proliferation, mitochondrial metabolic patterns change. The mitochondria of naïve T cells are often fragmented, relying predominantly on mitochondrial OXPHOS and FAO to maintain energy requirements in a resting state (31). Through regulating the surface expression of GLUT1, which is required for basal glucose uptake, metabolic homeostasis is maintained, thereby promoting OXPHOS (32). Mitochondrial pyruvate carrier 1 (MPC1) promotes mitochondrial uptake and oxidation of pyruvate, which is crucial for the development and maturation of T cells in the thymus (33). Within the first 24 h of T-cell activation, the mitochondrial proteome undergoes notable restructuring, enhancing mitochondrial one-carbon metabolism to support rapid T-cell activation (34). Stomatin like protein-2forms microdomains in mitochondria and cell membranes, promoting membrane regionalization and assembly of the T-cell receptor (TCR) signaling complex, thereby enhancing T-cell activation (35).
Upon T-cell activation, mitochondria undergo morphological changes, transforming from a fragmented state into longer, more fused forms. Activated T cells exhibit marked increases in OXPHOS, the TCA cycle and FAS to maintain their effector functions (36). When T cells recognize antigens, they transition from a resting state to an activated state, characterized predominantly by proliferation, survival and differentiation, which drive the initiation of the cell cycle, cell growth, IL-2 signaling and enhanced metabolic flux to sustain anabolic metabolism (37). TCR signals, co-stimulatory signals and cytokines are necessary conditions for full activation of T cells, with activation levels assessed by proliferation capacity, cytokine secretion, effector performance and differentiation state, all requiring enhanced anabolic metabolism to provide the necessary energy and material base (38,39). When TCR and co-receptors recognize the antigen peptide-major histocompatibility complex (MHC) (signal 1) and receive co-stimulation (signal 2), it triggers phosphorylation signals such as PI3K/AKT, activating mTOR complex 1 (mTORC1) and transcription factors, such as NFAT and MYC in activated T cells, thereby regulating the expression of key enzymes in glycolysis and mitochondrial anabolic metabolism (40,41). In early T-cell activation before cell division, enhanced glycolytic flux and mitochondrial respiration occur. This process takes place in mature immune synapses (ISs) lasting several hours, providing a platform for repeated transmission of T-cell signals (42,43).
Memory CD8+ T cells exhibit long-term survival in the body through FAO; upon re-encountering the same antigen, mitochondrial metabolism involving FAO and OXPHOS is increased to support the rapid proliferation of memory T cells, and mitochondrial morphology transforms from fragmented to fused, with tightly packed cristae and higher metabolic efficiency. Exhausted T cells exhibit decreased mitochondrial quality and function, reduced glucose uptake, and lowered levels of glycolysis and OXPHOS (44). Some T cells enhance FAO by increasing AMPK activity or inhibiting mTOR to participate in the transition from an effector to a memory state (45). T-cell activation is illustrated in Fig. 1.
Tumor immune niches, tertiary lymphoid structures (TLSs) and tumor-draining lymph nodes (TDLNs) are key sites of intercellular communication (46,47); notably, interest has been garnered in spatial determinants that regulate CD8+ T-cell function in these locations. TDLNs naturally serve as reservoirs for tumor-specific CD8+ TILs. Extensive research has provided evidence of CD8+ T cells migrating from TDLNs to the tumor, demonstrating that tumor-specific CD8+ T cells activated in TDLNs generally exist in a minimally exhausted precursor-exhausted T cell (Tpex) or Tpex-like state, whereas their clone-related TILs predominantly exhibit an exhausted terminally differentiated T-cell phenotype (48–51).
Within the TME, the localization, distribution patterns and anatomical positions of CD8+ T cells markedly affect their functional state, differentiation fate and antitumor efficacy (52). Studies have demonstrated that the spatial positioning of CD8+ T cells determines functional subtypes, and the Immunoscore system can be used to quantify CD8+ T-cell density in the tumor core and invasive margin region, in order to predict prognosis (53–55). Unlike traditional memory-like differentiation, CD8+ T-cell subtypes in the TME show that Tpex cells share certain stem-like characteristics with memory T cells (such as TCF1 expression); however, their terminal exhaustion state is difficult to reverse due to epigenetic reprogramming and persistent antigen exposure (56).
Metabolic heterogeneity appears to contribute to the heterogeneity of the tumor immune microenvironment. Hypoxic zones at the tumor core inhibit the mitochondrial respiratory chain through hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF)-1α, leading to TIL metabolic reprogramming towards inefficient glycolysis, inhibiting mitochondrial biogenesis and resulting in functional exhaustion (57). Conversely, in oxygen-rich perivascular regions, TILs retain OXPHOS capabilities, maintaining stem-like characteristics. Malignant cells with high glycolytic activity can transform their metabolic pathways into anabolic reactions (58), producing large amounts of immunosuppressive mediators, such as lactate and adenosine, inhibiting mitochondrial function, and weakening TIL survival and cytotoxic functions (59,60).
TLSs are often located near blood vessels (61), where expression of mitochondrial biogenesis markers is markedly higher compared with in non-TLS region TILs. Perivascular TIL subtypes have unique metabolic adaptability, and spatially, TILs located around blood vessels exhibit lower concentrations of inhibitors such as lactate, adenosine and ROS compared with those in the tumor core. Glucose, glutamine and oxygen concentrations are close to normal tissue levels, supporting aerobic mitochondrial metabolism of TILs (62), with mitochondrial structures and functions being more intact. Mitochondrial metabolites serve as substrates for epigenetic modifications, with spatial microenvironment differences leading to diverse histone acetylation/methylation patterns in TILs, affecting TIL exhaustion or transition into memory cells (63). Enhancing MPC-dependent OXPHOS through the IL-10-Fc fusion protein can reprogram terminally exhausted T-cell metabolism, restoring some function (64). In summary, TLSs can construct blood vessel-associated metabolic zones, allowing internal TILs to avoid tumor metabolic inhibition, maintain mitochondrial function and epigenetic plasticity, becoming functional response pools for immunotherapy.
Mitochondrial functions and metabolic pathways undergo metabolic reprogramming to adapt to cellular environments or states (35). Mitochondrial metabolic reprogramming can enhance the antitumor activity and immune response of T cells, serving a critical role in the antitumor activity of T cells infiltrating the TME (65).
Continuous stimulation of T cells in hypoxic environments can lead to Blimp-1-mediated peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ coactivator 1α (PGC-1α)-dependent mitochondrial reprogramming inhibition, resulting in persistent loss of mitochondrial function and quality (66). Notably, upregulation of PGC-1α enhances mitochondrial biogenesis and metabolic abilities, boosting the antitumor effects of CD8+ T cells (67). In glucose-deficient TMEs, activation of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) to nucleus signaling 1α-X-box binding protein 1 signaling axis inhibits the abundance of glutamine transporters in T cells, limiting the availability of glutamine crucial for maintaining mitochondrial respiration and leading to reduced T-cell antitumor function (68). Additionally, under glucose-restricted conditions, T cells suppress signaling pathways via the mTORC1 pathway, reducing the expression of antigen-induced genes, and weakening CD8+ T-cell adhesion, proliferation capacity and their ability to secrete cytokines, such as IFN-γ, granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor and granzyme B (36,69).
MPC deficiency hampers mitochondrial oxidation of lactate, impairing CD8+ T-cell antitumor effector functions (70). The half-life-extended leukocyte IL-10-Fc fusion protein enhances the proliferation and cytotoxic function of terminally exhausted CD8+ T cells by upregulating MPC-dependent OXPHOS metabolism, thereby improving the antitumor efficacy of immunotherapy (64). Linoleic acid enhances ER-mitochondria contacts in CD8+ T cells, promoting Ca2+ signaling and mitochondrial energy metabolism, maintaining metabolic balance (71); this enables secretion of more cytokines such as granzyme B and perforin, enhancing their cytotoxic capability (72), thereby bolstering CD8+ T-cell activity and antitumor capacity in the TME. Therefore, mitochondrial metabolic reprogramming can enhance the antitumor activity and immune response of T cells.
Immune checkpoints are a class of immunosuppressive molecules that regulate the degree of immune activation to prevent overly activated T cells from damaging normal tissues. Programmed death-1 (PD-)1 and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) are common immune checkpoints, which have notable immunoregulatory roles under normal circumstances. When programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) is highly expressed on tumor cells and binds with PD-1 receptors on T cells, it transmits negative regulatory signals to inhibit TCR signaling and CD28-mediated co-stimulatory signals, leading to T-cell exhaustion and loss of immune response, promoting tumor immune escape (73). The costimulatory molecule CTLA-4 on T cells binds with B7 molecules on antigen-presenting cells (APCs), suppressing T-cell proliferation and activation, as well as antitumor cell capabilities, promoting tumor immune escape (74).
The expression level of immune checkpoint molecules can influence T-cell differentiation and function by affecting mitochondrial structure, function and metabolism. Mitochondrial structural changes occur in response to immune checkpoint molecules, with PD-1 stimulation leading to a reduction in the number and length of mitochondrial cristae (75). When PD-1 binds to PD-L1, it phosphorylates the immunoreceptor tyrosine-based switch motif and immunoreceptor tyrosine-based inhibitory motif on the PD-1 tail, recruiting the SHP2 phosphatase, which inhibits the Ras/MAPK and PI3K/AKT/mTOR glycolytic regulatory pathways critical for T-cell activation. This reduces the glycolytic capacity of T cells, weakening their proliferation and activation functions (76,77). As well as inhibiting T-cell glycolysis, the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway can upregulate the expression of adipose triglyceride lipase and carnitine palmitoyltransferase 1A (CPT1A), promoting endogenous lipid FAO. This shift enables T cells to utilize fatty acid metabolism for sustained survival, thereby delaying T-cell exhaustion (75). Furthermore, PD-1 signaling phosphorylates STAT3, promoting the expression of CPT1B, a key rate-limiting enzyme in FAO, which accelerates fatty acid catabolism, and inhibits the glycolytic process and functions of CD8+ T effector cells.
When tumor cell-secreted PD-L1 exosomes bind to T-cell PD-1, they activate the CREB and STAT signaling pathways, upregulating cholesterol and phospholipid synthases, promoting lipid metabolism, and accelerating T-cell aging (78,79). In lung cancer, PD-1 on CD8+ T cells inhibits the AKT signaling pathway, promoting the nuclear translocation of the transcription factor GATA1, which inhibits the transcription of phospholipid phosphatase 1. This leads to abnormal phospholipid metabolism, converting unsaturated fatty acids in the TME to unsaturated phospholipids, inducing ferroptosis in CD8+ T cells, reducing cytokine secretion and weakening the antitumor immune response (80).
Mitophagy is the selective degradation of damaged or dysfunctional mitochondria by cells to maintain homeostasis. There are two main mechanisms of mitophagy: One is the ubiquitin pathway mediated by the Parkin-PINK1 signaling cascade, and the other is the receptor-dependent pathway mediated by BNIP3 and NIX. The Parkin-PINK1 pathway facilitates degradation by adding ubiquitin chains on the surface of damaged mitochondria (81), whereas NIX or BNIP3 are expressed on the mitochondrial surface, and directly recruit and assemble autophagosomes upon mitochondrial damage (82). In healthy mitochondria, PINK1 is constantly cleaved and degraded (83); when mitochondria are depolarized or damaged, PINK1 stabilizes on the outer mitochondrial membrane (OMM) and phosphorylates, recruiting the E3 ubiquitin ligase Parkin. Parkin catalyzes the formation of multiple types of ubiquitin chains on OMM proteins, such as mitofusin (MFN)1/2 and voltage-dependent anion channel (VDAC) (84). By clearing damaged mitochondria, mitophagy suppresses the production of IFN-1 and the activation of inflammasomes, thereby reducing the secretion of IL-1β and IL-18, and preventing the accumulation of mitochondria-derived damage-associated molecular patterns such as ROS and mtDNA (85). BNIP3 can interact with PINK1 to facilitate its stabilization and regulate the recruitment of Parkin. NIX can act as a Parkin substrate, enhancing the recruitment of autophagic adapter proteins via Parkin-mediated ubiquitination, thereby accelerating clearance.
Mitochondria are the primary organelles for intracellular production of ROS through the electron transport chain and OXPHOS process in aerobic respiration (86). The level and sustained generation capacity of ROS serve a crucial role in the antitumor immunity of T cells (87,88). In tumor immunity, activated T cells achieve tumor cell killing by increasing ROS production, recruiting neutrophils and macrophages (89). Extracellular ROS can also affect T-cell activation by altering the immunogenicity of antigen peptides in APCs (90).
Excessive ROS can cause damage to nuclear and mtDNA, and oxidative damage to proteins and lipids, leading to cellular damage (91). It promotes T-cell apoptosis by upregulating pro-apoptotic factors such as Fas and downregulating the expression of the anti-apoptotic protein Bcl-2 (92). Elevated ROS can further promote the transformation of immunosuppressive cells, such as myeloid-derived suppressor cells, tumor-activated macrophages and regulatory T cells, through various pathways, including HIF-1α (93), supporting tumor cell proliferation (91,94). Targeted removal of tumor extracellular ROS can increase T-lymphocyte tumor infiltration, restoring T-cell antitumor immunity induced by immunogenic cell death (95). Additionally, the deficiency of reduced glutathione in regulatory T cells can lead to serine metabolism abnormalities and downregulation of the transcriptional regulator Foxp3 expression, ultimately weakening the immunosuppressive function of regulatory T cells (96).
Mitochondrial dynamics refer to the continuous processes of fission and fusion, transfer and positioning within cells under physiological or stimulated states, regulating the dynamic equilibrium of mitochondrial distribution, quantity, size and shape within cells (97). The synergistic interactions and balance between mitochondrial dynamics are important for maintaining mitochondrial adaptation to varying metabolic demands and stress environments.
Mitochondrial fusion is the process whereby two mitochondria merge into a single organelle, undergoing morphological changes in response to cellular energy demands and the need for material exchange between mitochondria. Proteins involved in mitochondrial fusion in mammalian cells include MFN1, MFN2 and optic atrophy 1 protein (OPA1). MFN1 and MFN2 primarily mediate the fusion of the mitochondrial outer membrane, whereas OPA1 is involved in the inner membrane fusion process. Additionally, MFN2 is located on the ER membrane, mediating physical contact between the ER and mitochondria, and Ca2+ homeostasis (98).
During the process of T-cell expansion, mitochondrial fusion prompts a metabolic shift in T cells from glycolysis to FAO and OXPHOS, facilitating the differentiation of naïve T cells into memory phenotypes and enhancing antitumor persistence (99). By regulating Ca2+ homeostasis and ROS levels, mitochondrial fusion maintains TCR signaling and transcription factor activation such as NFAT, promoting the expression of effector molecules including IL-2. Mitochondria that are partially damaged can receive NADH, FADH2 and TCA intermediates from healthy mitochondria through fusion, sustaining their ATP production capabilities. Mitochondrial fusion allows adjacent mitochondria to share mtDNA, metabolites and enzymes, maintaining OXPHOS activity, which is particularly important in the oxidative stress of TME. Moreover, MFN1 is involved in the clearance of damaged mitochondria through the ER-associated degradation pathway mediated by the polyubiquitination action of the E3 ubiquitin ligase Parkin (100).
Single-cell RNA sequencing analysis of CD8+ T cells isolated from tumor samples has revealed that MFN2 expression levels gradually increase with CD8+ T-cell activation and enhanced OXPHOS (101). CD8+ T cells deficient in MFN2 exhibit decreased mitochondrial metabolism and function. MFN1/2, which drive outer membrane fusion, and OPA1, which drives inner membrane fusion, are key targets in controlling mitochondrial dynamics (2,102). MFN1/2 and OPA1 maintain mitochondrial OXPHOS function through fusion, providing energy support for CD8+ T-cell survival and function, and sustaining intracellular signaling pathways, such as the mTOR pathway, which are crucial for CD8+ T-cell activation and cytotoxicity (99). In tumor-bearing mice, drugs promoting mitochondrial fusion can extend the lifespan of effector CD8+ T cells, and enhance their secretion of INF-γ and TNF-α (99). In addition, stimulating the T-cell surface receptor 4-1BB can enhance mitochondrial fusion and biogenesis in CD8+ TILs (103).
Mitochondrial fission refers to the process where a mitochondrion divides to produce smaller and more dispersed mitochondria, assisting in the movement of mitochondria to regions requiring energy. Mitochondrial fission is primarily mediated by dynamin-related protein 1 (Drp1), which is recruited to the mitochondrial outer membrane, inducing mitochondrial constriction and fragmentation. Moderate fission benefits cell division and autophagy, but excessive fission can lead to mitochondrial fragmentation, loss of membrane potential, decreased ATP production and subsequently, cell apoptosis (104).
During T-cell activation, mitochondrial fission accelerators are required to facilitate mitochondrial division and upregulate calcineurin activity to activate Drp1 (105,106), inducing mitochondrial fission and inner membrane cristae remodeling, which ultimately leads to mitochondrial aggregation below the TCR clusters (43). An increase in mitochondrial numbers and inner membrane cristae remodeling aids in controlling glycolysis-associated signaling, serving an essential regulatory role in effector T-cell activation. T cells recognize antigens through forming an IS with APCs. During the activation process induced by TCR and CD28 co-stimulation, mitochondria rapidly produce and release ATP at the IS, increasing intracellular Ca2+ concentration, promoting T-cell activation and proliferation (107,108). T-cell activation requires mitochondrial translocation along the microtubule network to the IS, supporting sustained activation through maintenance of Ca2+ signals (109). At the IS, Drp1-mediated mitochondrial fission helps maintain intracellular Ca2+ levels, activating mTOR and cMyc signaling pathways, thereby promoting T-cell proliferation. Suppression of Drp1 expression hampers CD8+ T-cell migration and effector functions (110). Mitochondrial fission, driven by GTPase Drp1 oligomerization, is vital for CD8+ T-cell chemotaxis and infiltration, and controls mitochondrial distribution during cell proliferation. Changes in mitochondrial dynamics transform mitochondria from isolated ‘energy factories’ into functionally integrated metabolic communities, markedly enhancing the ability of the cell to adapt to environmental stress. This is particularly critical for maintaining T-cell function within the TME (70).
Mitochondrial transfer is part of mitochondrial dynamics, involving various mechanisms such as gap junctions, nanotubes and extracellular vesicles (111). Tunnel nanotubes (TNTs) are one of the primary routes for mitochondrial transfer. Transport through nanotubes is a GTP-dependent process, with GTP primarily generated in the mitochondrial TCA cycle providing energy for mitochondrial dynamic changes and transport (112). Tumor cells can scavenge mitochondria from immune cells via nanotubes, causing unidirectional mitochondrial transfer from immune cells to tumor cells, enhancing mitochondrial respiration function, proliferation capacity and accelerating tumor progression (113). Tumor cells can transfer mitochondria to T cells through TNTs or extracellular vesicles, replacing existing mitochondria in T cells with mutated tumor cell mitochondria, thereby inhibiting the antitumor immune response of T cells (8). TNTs can effectively transfer mitochondria from bone marrow stromal cells to T cells, enhancing their metabolic abilities. When ‘reengineered’ T cells are transferred into tumor-bearing hosts, they exhibit vigorous proliferation, higher infiltration efficiency into tumors, reduced apoptosis rate and stronger antitumor capabilities (114).
Mitochondria and the nucleus maintain cellular homeostasis and mtDNA integrity through bidirectional signaling, coordinating stress responses, metabolic adaptation and cell survival (115,116). Anterograde signaling from the nucleus involves nuclear-encoded proteins such as TFAM, PGC-1α and NRF1/2 to regulate mitochondrial replication and repair in response to cellular needs (117,118). Conversely, mitochondria utilize retrograde signaling to relay metabolic stress signals such as changes in Ca2+, ROS or NAD+/NADH back to the nucleus, reprogramming gene expression to restore function (119,120). The integration of anterograde and retrograde signals constitutes mitonuclear communication, which is crucial for maintaining mtDNA integrity, particularly under stress conditions such as radiation. mtDNA is the genetic material within mitochondria, which has a key role in OXPHOS and energy metabolism in cells. Mutations in the mitochondrial genome are an important component of cancer mutant genomes (121). As a common intracellular damage-associated molecular pattern, mtDNA breakdown and release are crucial factors in mitochondrial dysfunction-mediated inflammation (122,123). Abnormal mitochondrial gene copy number, gene expression alterations and mtDNA epigenetic modifications often influence cancer occurrence and malignant transformation by regulating cellular metabolism, ROS production and intercellular interactions (124).
Excessive production of ROS causes oxidative stress, a major source of DNA damage (125). When cells experience oxidative stress, the integrity of the mitochondrial membrane is compromised, promoting the release of oxidized mtDNA into the cytoplasm, triggering IFN and pro-inflammatory responses (126,127). In the TME, the extracellular leakage of mtDNA is mainly mediated by extracellular vesicles composed of exosomes, microvesicles and apoptotic bodies. mtDNA can enter extracellular vesicles through direct contact or mitochondrial-derived vesicles, and then be transported into the extracellular space where it can be passively released during cell death through mechanical damage-mediated rupture of the cell membrane (128). Once released into the cytoplasm, mtDNA can be recognized by pattern-recognition receptors such as cyclic GMP-AMP synthase (cGAS), Toll-like receptor (TLR)9, and NOD-, LRR-, and pyrin domain-containing protein 3 (NLRP3), activating downstream inflammatory signaling pathways, including the cGAS-stimulator of interferon genes (STING) pathway, TLR9-myeloid differentiation primary response 88-NF-κB pathway and NLRP3 inflammasome pathway. mtDNA stress elevates immunoproteasomes and MHC class I antigen presentation pathways through the cGAS/STING/type I IFN signaling pathway, leading to autonomous activation and proliferation of CD8+ T cells (129).
Direct or indirect cell contact facilitates the transfer of mtDNA-mutated mitochondria from cancer cells to TILs, which exhibit metabolic abnormalities, cell senescence, functional defects, impaired memory formation and effector function (8). In melanoma models, mtDNA is kinetically released in an ATP-dependent manner into the cytosol, inducing PD-L1 expression through the STING-IFN pathway, promoting immune escape (130). mtDNA mutations render tumors more sensitive to immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) therapies; alterations in redox balance caused by mtDNA mutations increase tumor sensitivity to ICB (131). How mitochondria regulate T-cell tumor immunity pathways is illustrated in Fig. 2.
Mitochondrial dysfunction within the TME is a notable reason for the impaired antitumor immune response and antitumor activity in response to diverse immunotherapies. Targeting mitochondrial energy metabolism, mitochondrial dynamics and other mitochondrial physiological processes to rebuild T-cell antitumor function has proven effective in some cancer models (70,132,133). Therefore, regulating mitochondrial metabolism, dynamics or other physiological processes, and increasing mitochondrial quality to restore T-cell antitumor activity may be a new strategy for cancer treatment in the future.
The activity of enolase 1 in tumor-infiltrating CD8+ T cells is impaired, limiting glycolytic processes and glucose metabolism, which can be restored by enhancing enolase 1 activity or supplementing with exogenous phosphoenolpyruvate and pyruvate, thereby restoring glucose metabolism and antitumor activity in CD8+ T cells (134). In aging tumor-bearing mice, the content of spermidine (SPD) in CD8+ T cells is markedly reduced. SPD enhances FAO activity by binding the mitochondrial trifunctional protein complex, thus boosting CD8+ T cell-mediated antitumor immunity (135). Tetrahydrobiopterin (BH4) is involved in regulating mitochondrial respiration and is essential for CD8+ T-cell expansion; increasing BH4 or overexpressing BH4 synthase GTP cyclohydrolase 1 can enhance CD8+ T-cell antitumor activity and inhibit tumor progression (136). An epigenetic activator EnPGC-1, developed based on DNA, can enhance mitochondrial activation, energy metabolism and CD8+ T-cell proliferation in vitro, synergizing with PD-1 blockade to boost antitumor immunity, thereby improving host survival (137).
CD8+ T cells overexpressing PGC-1α exhibit higher levels of OXPHOS and greater spare respiratory capacity, have longer survival times and possess stronger antitumor effects (66). Enhancing PGC-1α expression and activity restores T-cell mitochondrial function and metabolic reprogramming, leading to increased cytokine production and enhanced antitumor effects. ROS precursors or mitochondrial uncouplers produce ROS to synergistically enhance the antitumor effects of PD-1 blockade therapy through intratumoral effector/memory cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs), increasing mTOR, AMPK and downstream transcription factors PGC-1α and T-box expressed in T cells expression; applying related activators can synergize with PD-1 blockade therapy (138). Targeted removal of extracellular ROS in tumors increases T-lymphocyte tumor infiltration, restoring T-cell antitumor immunity induced by immunogenic cell death (95).
Research on melanoma models has revealed that the use of PPARα agonists to promote FAO can enhance the ability of CD8+ TILs to slow tumor progression (139). In addition, TILs with high expression of PGC-1α exhibit stronger mitochondrial adaptability and longer survival times within the tumor (66). These two pathways help recover energy and overcome exhaustion in tumor-infiltrating chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cells. Mitochondrial dysfunction and HIF-1α-mediated glycolytic reprogramming contribute to T-cell exhaustion; using 2-deoxy-D-glucose pharmacological inhibitors to suppress glycolytic reprogramming is a viable metabolic intervention strategy to maintain CAR-T cell stemness, longevity and function during tumor immunotherapy (29). Targeting Regnase-1 enhances mitochondrial adaptability through basic leucine zipper ATF-like transcription factor, promoting effector T cells for tumor therapy and boosting tumor adoptive cell therapy (140). VDAC2, a protein located on the mitochondrial outer membrane, increases CD8+ T-cell proportion in tumors lacking VDAC2, exhibiting stronger effector functions; targeting mitochondrial VDAC2 directly kills tumor cells and recruits more CD8+ T cells to reshape the immune microenvironment (141).
Mitochondrial fusion is a key regulatory hub that determines the metabolic mode selection and functional vitality of T cells. In exhausted T cells, restricted mitochondrial fusion leads to abnormal mitochondrial morphology, impacting quality control and biosynthesis, inducing mitochondrial dysfunction and metabolic reprogramming (142). Targeting mitochondrial fusion to restore T-cell vitality and reverse exhaustion may become a novel strategy in tumor immunotherapy (143).
PGC-1α regulates mitochondrial function and quality by modulating fusion and fission processes. In the Lewis lung carcinoma mouse model, the PGC-1α agonist bezafibrate has been reported to markedly increase ROS in tumor-infiltrating effector CTLs and the expression of FAO-related genes in tumor tissues. This promoted an increase in C-X-C motif chemokine ligand (CXCL)9, CXCL10 and C-X-C motif chemokine receptor 3 receptor expression in infiltrating CTLs, supporting CD8+ T-cell survival, infiltration and activation (144). Bezafibrate may further enhance CTL mitochondrial activation by upregulating OXPHOS and glycolysis, improving their proliferation and effector functions, increasing FAO rate and mitochondrial respiratory capacity to meet cellular energy demands, enhancing antitumor immunity (145).
The process by which tumor cells ‘hijack’ functional mitochondria from T cells via TNTs may constitute an alternative mechanism of immune evasion. Selectively inhibiting TNT formation could be considered a strategic approach to target mitochondrial involvement in antitumor activity. Current pan-inhibitors (such as farnesyltransferase inhibitors and cytochalasin) only partially suppress TNT formation due to a lack of specific markers (113,146). Studies have shown that mitochondrial transfer is highly related to actin filament regulators Pim-1 proto-oncogene, serine/threonine kinase, myosin IB, profilin-1, and Abl-interactor 1, which may serve as targets to disrupt TNTs (147,148). The cell adhesion molecule poliovirus receptor-related 2 (encoding Nectin-2) is also one of the top predictive markers for mitochondrial transfer (149). Additionally, mitochondrial transfer can improve CD8+ T-cell mitochondrial quality and metabolic adaptability, proving useful in adoptive immunotherapy (114).
Pierini et al (150) utilized abnormal mitochondrial proteins isolated from tumors to develop a cancer vaccine as an immunotherapeutic strategy. Sequencing of tumor mtDNA identified mutant proteins cyclooxygenase-1 (COX1) and mitochondrially encoded NADH dehydrogenase 5 (MT-ND5) for tumor mitochondrial vaccine production. COX1 mutant peptides, when utilized as vaccines, not only delayed tumor growth but also induced specific T-cell immune responses. Introducing a truncated mutation of mtDNA-encoded complex I gene MT-ND5 in mouse melanoma models has been reported to encourage Warburg-like metabolic shifts, remodeling the TME and persistently activating antitumor immune responses (131). Furthermore, mtDNA can strengthen antitumor immune effects in dendritic cell-derived extracellular vesicle vaccines for lung and pancreatic cancer (151).
Another direction in mitochondrial gene therapy is mtDNA genomic editing, a field where traditional tools such as CRISPR-Cas9 have excelled in nuclear DNA editing but face challenges, such as delivering Cas9 to mitochondria and off-target effects. The innovative transcription activator-like effector-linked deaminase (TALED) technology offers precise single-base conversion without DNA double-strand breaks, enabling base editing. TALEDs facilitate adenine to guanine conversions, crucial for repairing mutations associated with mitochondrial diseases (152). An advanced study into TALED-induced mitochondria-driven precise base editing has elucidated reliance on the base excision repair pathway of cells, leading to enhanced TALEDs, which enable efficient mtDNA adenine base editing (153). Introducing or correcting mutations in cell and animal models allows more accurate exploration of the role of mtDNA in cancer metabolism (153). Future aims may include in vitro mtDNA editing to promote mitochondrial biogenesis and OXPHOS to address progressive mitochondrial quality loss in unmodified TILs.
Abnormal mitochondrial function in tumor cells has positioned compound-based mitochondrial targeting as a promising strategy to eradicate chemoresistant cancer cells. Studies on small molecules/nano-inducers have focused primarily on mitophagy regulation and mitochondrial-targeted damage strategies (154,155). Development of mitochondrial nano-inducers targets selective mitophagy within autophagosomes to degrade mitochondria, markedly enhancing CD8+ T-cell immune attacks by increasing MHC-I molecule expression, reducing the anti-apoptotic protein BCL-XL and releasing signaling molecules that activate T cells, thus improving antitumor immune responses (156). KCKT is an in situ transformable nanoparticle, and KCKT platform nanoparticles facilitate lysosomal escape and direct mitochondrial damage while blocking protective autophagy, notably enhancing drug delivery and mitochondrial targeting efficiency, providing a novel option for therapy (157). Azocarbonyl-propargyl-modified supramolecular albumin nanoparticles achieve targeted drug release in hypoxic tumor zones. For example, SHC4H nanoparticles co-release hydroxychloroquine and a mitochondrial-targeted photosensitizer to treat hypoxic tumors by modulating mitosis-induced oxidative stress cascades (158). TAEN is a developed modular acid/enzyme dual-gated nanotechnology platform, designed for efficient cascade drug delivery from lysosomes to mitochondria. TAEN uses hierarchical targeting to stabilize drug loading during circulation, selectively accumulate at tumor sites, and cascade-deliver drugs to mitochondria starting from lysosomes at the subcellular level. This nanotechnology effectively induces mtROS stress to cleave gasdermin-E, provoking tumor cell pyroptosis, enhancing tumor-killing efficiency by 30–50 times and activating antitumor immune responses (159).
Mitochondria are crucial organelles in tumor cell metabolic reprogramming. In addition to providing energy, they are critical in tumor cell survival, immune evasion, tumor progression and the immunosuppressive environment of hypoxic TMEs. Mitochondrial metabolic reprogramming provides energy and biosynthetic precursors, forming the basis for T-cell activation, proliferation and differentiation. Dynamic remodeling regulates the functional state of T cells, and maintaining mitochondrial quality is a key target to prevent T-cell exhaustion in the tumor TME and to enhance the effectiveness of immunotherapy. The present review discusses mitochondrial metabolism and biogenesis, dynamics, mtDNA interactions, mtROS involvement and the interplay with T cells in the TME, and antitumor immunity. The study aims to provide insights for developing innovative antitumor immunotherapies from the mitochondrial-tumor immunity perspective.
However, the discussion on mitochondrial targeted therapy in the present review lacks validation through large clinical cohorts, and prospective studies on mtDNA mutations and the efficacy of immunotherapy are still limited. More clinical research targeting mitochondria is needed in the future to facilitate the translation of theories into treatments. Additionally, although the study explores T-cell spatial heterogeneity, it lacks a systematic analysis of the patterns of mitochondrial defects and their immune impacts across different cancer types. Cross-cancer comparative studies are urgently needed to guide the development of precise immunotherapy strategies.
Current mitochondria-targeting immunotherapies incorporate mitochondrial-targeting drugs and immune checkpoint inhibitors to improve T-cell metabolic adaptability, reduce ROS damage and limit tumor energy supply, enhancing T-cell cytotoxicity. Targeting Drp1/MFN2 can restore T-cell mitochondrial morphology and function, reversing the exhausted state. Specific targeting and elimination of mutated DNA in the mitochondrial genome enables precise delivery of therapeutic genes. Small molecule/nano-inducers targeting mitochondria increase targeting precision and reduce off-target toxicity. However, mitochondrial targeting strategies, despite their theoretical promise, face multiple challenges in clinical translation. Firstly, there is a technical lack of efficient and specific mitochondrial targeting delivery systems. The dual-layer structure of the mitochondrial membrane and low lysosomal escape efficiency are major reasons for delivery failure (160,161). This requires a mechanistic analysis of the interaction between carriers and mitochondrial membranes, and the development of non-membrane potential-dependent targeting strategies. Secondly, viral vectors may induce immune responses, and the accumulation of nanomaterials in organs requires optimization through renal clearance engineering, with toxicity risks urgently needing evaluation (162,163). Lastly, regarding the demand for personalized treatment, mtDNA heterogeneity necessitates the development of patient-specific editing strategies, and clinical translation requires integration with patient-specific barrier profiles. With advancements in single-cell sequencing technology enhancing the resolution of mtDNA heterogeneity analysis, combined with artificial intelligence-driven predictive models, the future of mitochondrial medicine will focus on transforming mitochondrial disease treatment models from ‘one-way intervention’ to ‘dynamic precision regulation’, accelerating the clinical implementation of precision treatment technologies.
Not applicable.
This work was supported by the Joint Innovation Fund of Health Commission of Chengdu and Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine (grant no. WXLH202405010).
Not applicable.
MZ, ZL, YH and YY wrote the original draft. YX and KC restructured the manuscript's organization, edited the manuscript and created the figures. ZZ and DC reviewed and edited the manuscript. CZ acquired funding reviewed and edited the manuscript. Data authentication is not applicable. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
|
Bereiter-Hahn J: Behavior of mitochondria in the living cell. Int Rev Cytol. 122:1–63. 1990. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Chan DC: Mitochondrial dynamics and its involvement in disease. Annu Rev Pathol. 15:235–259. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Mills EL, Kelly B and O'Neill LAJ: Mitochondria are the powerhouses of immunity. Nat Immunol. 18:488–498. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Chandel NS: Mitochondria. Cold Spring Harbor Perspect Biol. 13:a0405432021. View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Seo JH, Agarwal E, Bryant KG, Caino MC, Kim ET, Kossenkov AV, Tang HY, Languino LR, Gabrilovich DI, Cohen AR, et al: Syntaphilin ubiquitination regulates mitochondrial dynamics and tumor cell movements. Cancer Res. 78:4215–4228. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Wellen KE and Thompson CB: A two-way street: Reciprocal regulation of metabolism and signalling. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 13:270–276. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Chan DC: Mitochondrial fusion and fission in mammals. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 22:79–99. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Ikeda H, Kawase K, Nishi T, Watanabe T, Takenaga K, Inozume T, Ishino T, Aki S, Lin J, Kawashima S, et al: Immune evasion through mitochondrial transfer in the tumour microenvironment. Nature. 638:225–236. 2025. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Suzuki J, Yamada T, Inoue K, Nabe S, Kuwahara M, Takemori N, Takemori A, Matsuda S, Kanoh M, Imai Y, et al: The tumor suppressor menin prevents effector CD8 T-cell dysfunction by targeting mTORC1-dependent metabolic activation. Nat Commun. 9:32962018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Harrington JS, Ryter SW, Plataki M, Price DR and Choi AMK: Mitochondria in health, disease, and aging. Physiol Rev. 103:2349–2422. 2023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
El Hiani Y, Ahidouch A, Lehen'kyi V, Hague F, Gouilleux F, Mentaverri R, Kamel S, Lassoued K, Brûlé G and Ouadid-Ahidouch H: Extracellular signal-regulated kinases 1 and 2 and TRPC1 channels are required for calcium-sensing receptor-stimulated MCF-7 breast cancer cell proliferation. Cell Physiol Biochem. 23:335–346. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
DeBerardinis RJ and Chandel NS: Fundamentals of cancer metabolism. Sci Adv. 2:e16002002016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Liu BH, Xu CZ, Liu Y, Lu ZL, Fu TL, Li GR, Deng Y, Luo GQ, Ding S, Li N and Geng Q: Mitochondrial quality control in human health and disease. Mil Med Res. 11:322024.PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Vodnala SK, Eil R, Kishton RJ, Sukumar M, Yamamoto TN, Ha NH, Lee PH, Shin M, Patel SJ, Yu Z, et al: T cell stemness and dysfunction in tumors are triggered by a common mechanism. Science. 363:eaau01352019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Lyssiotis CA and Kimmelman AC: Metabolic interactions in the tumor microenvironment. Trends Cell Biol. 27:863–875. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Scharping NE, Rivadeneira DB, Menk AV, Vignali PDA, Ford BR, Rittenhouse NL, Peralta R, Wang Y, Wang Y, DePeaux K, et al: Mitochondrial stress induced by continuous stimulation under hypoxia rapidly drives T cell exhaustion. Nat Immunol. 22:205–215. 2021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Yu YR, Imrichova H, Wang H, Chao T, Xiao Z, Gao M, Rincon-Restrepo M, Franco F, Genolet R, Cheng WC, et al: Disturbed mitochondrial dynamics in CD8+ TILs reinforce T cell exhaustion. Nat Immunol. 21:1540–1551. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Vardhana SA, Hwee MA, Berisa M, Wells DK, Yost KE, King B, Smith M, Herrera PS, Chang HY, Satpathy AT, et al: Impaired mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation limits the self-renewal of T cells exposed to persistent antigen. Nat Immunol. 21:1022–1033. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Yang MQ, Zhang SL, Sun L, Huang LT, Yu J, Zhang JH, Tian Y, Han CB and Ma JT: Targeting mitochondria: Restoring the antitumor efficacy of exhausted T cells. Mol Cancer. 23:2602024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
König T, Nolte H, Aaltonen MJ, Tatsuta T, Krols M, Stroh T, Langer T and McBride HM: MIROs and DRP1 drive mitochondrial-derived vesicle biogenesis and promote quality control. Nat Cell Biol. 23:1271–1286. 2021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Mangalhara KC, Varanasi SK, Johnson MA, Burns MJ, Rojas GR, Esparza Moltó PB, Sainz AG, Tadepalle N, Abbott KL, Mendiratta G, et al: Manipulating mitochondrial electron flow enhances tumor immunogenicity. Science. 381:1316–1323. 2023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Sullivan LB, Gui DY and Vander Heiden MG: Altered metabolite levels in cancer: Implications for tumour biology and cancer therapy. Nat Rev Cancer. 16:680–693. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
De Martino M, Rathmell JC, Galluzzi L and Vanpouille-Box C: Cancer cell metabolism and antitumour immunity. Nat Rev Immunol. 24:654–669. 2024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Tian W, Liu Y, Cao C, Zeng Y, Pan Y, Liu X, Peng Y and Wu F: Chronic stress: Impacts on tumor microenvironment and implications for anti-cancer treatments. Front Cell Dev Biol. 9:7770182021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Lei Y, Liao F, Tian Y, Wang Y, Xia F and Wang J: Investigating the crosstalk between chronic stress and immune cells: Implications for enhanced cancer therapy. Front Neurosci. 17:13211762023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Liu Y, Tian S, Ning B, Huang T, Li Y and Wei Y: Stress and cancer: The mechanisms of immune dysregulation and management. Front Immunol. 13:10322942022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Kawano I, Bazila B, Ježek P and Dlasková A: Mitochondrial dynamics and cristae shape changes during metabolic reprogramming. Antioxid Redox Signaling. 39:684–707. 2023. View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Xu X, Araki K, Li S, Han JH, Ye L, Tan WG, Konieczny BT, Bruinsma MW, Martinez J, Pearce EL, et al: Autophagy is essential for effector CD8(+) T cell survival and memory formation. Nat Immunol. 15:1152–1161. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Wu H, Zhao X, Hochrein SM, Eckstein M, Gubert GF, Knöpper K, Mansilla AM, Öner A, Doucet-Ladevèze R, Schmitz W, et al: Mitochondrial dysfunction promotes the transition of precursor to terminally exhausted T cells through HIF-1α-mediated glycolytic reprogramming. Nat Commun. 14:68582023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Chang CH, Curtis JD, Maggi LB Jr, Faubert B, Villarino AV, O'Sullivan D, Huang SC, van der Windt GJ, Blagih J, Qiu J, et al: Posttranscriptional control of T cell effector function by aerobic glycolysis. Cell. 153:1239–1251. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Ron-Harel N, Santos D, Ghergurovich JM, Sage PT, Reddy A, Lovitch SB, Dephoure N, Satterstrom FK, Sheffer M, Spinelli JB, et al: Mitochondrial biogenesis and proteome remodeling promote one-carbon metabolism for T cell activation. Cell Metab. 24:104–117. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Guerrero JA, Klysz DD, Chen Y, Malipatlolla M, Lone J, Fowler C, Stuani L, May A, Bashti M, Xu P, et al: GLUT1 overexpression in CAR-T cells induces metabolic reprogramming and enhances potency. Nat Commun. 15:86582024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Ramstead AG, Wallace JA, Lee SH, Bauer KM, Tang WW, Ekiz HA, Lane TE, Cluntun AA, Bettini ML, Round JL, et al: Mitochondrial pyruvate carrier 1 promotes peripheral T cell homeostasis through metabolic regulation of thymic development. Cell Rep. 30:2889–2899.e6. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Christie DA, Kirchhof MG, Vardhana S, Dustin ML and Madrenas J: Mitochondrial and plasma membrane pools of stomatin-like protein 2 coalesce at the immunological synapse during T cell activation. PLoS One. 7:e371442012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Fan X, Yang M, Lang Y, Lu S, Kong Z, Gao Y, Shen N, Zhang D and Lv Z: Mitochondrial metabolic reprogramming in diabetic kidney disease. Cell Death Dis. 15:4422024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
MacIver NJ, Michalek RD and Rathmell JC: Metabolic regulation of T lymphocytes. Annu Rev Immunol. 31:259–283. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Chapman NM and Chi H: Hallmarks of T-cell exit from quiescence. Cancer Immunol Res. 6:502–508. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Mescher MF, Curtsinger JM, Agarwal P, Casey KA, Gerner M, Hammerbeck CD, Popescu F and Xiao Z: Signals required for programming effector and memory development by CD8+ T cells. Immunol Rev. 211:81–92. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Makowski L, Chaib M and Rathmell JC: Immunometabolism: From basic mechanisms to translation. Immunol Rev. 295:5–14. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Wang R, Dillon CP, Shi LZ, Milasta S, Carter R, Finkelstein D, McCormick LL, Fitzgerald P, Chi H, Munger J and Green DR: The transcription factor Myc controls metabolic reprogramming upon T lymphocyte activation. Immunity. 35:871–882. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Vaeth M, Maus M, Klein-Hessling S, Freinkman E, Yang J, Eckstein M, Cameron S, Turvey SE, Serfling E, Berberich-Siebelt F, et al: Store-operated Ca2+ entry controls clonal expansion of T cells through metabolic reprogramming. Immunity. 47:664–679.e6. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Stirnweiss A, Hartig R, Gieseler S, Lindquist JA, Reichardt P, Philipsen L, Simeoni L, Poltorak M, Merten C, Zuschratter W, et al: T cell activation results in conformational changes in the Src family kinase Lck to induce its activation. Sci Signaling. 6:ra132013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Schwindling C, Quintana A, Krause E and Hoth M: Mitochondria positioning controls local calcium influx in T cells. J Immunol. 184:184–190. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Velnati S, Massarotti A, Antona A, Talmon M, Fresu LG, Galetto AS, Capello D, Bertoni A, Mercalli V, Graziani A, et al: Structure activity relationship studies on Amb639752: toward the identification of a common pharmacophoric structure for DGKα inhibitors. J Enzyme Inhib Med Chem. 35:96–108. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Araki K, Turner AP, Shaffer VO, Gangappa S, Keller SA, Bachmann MF, Larsen CP and Ahmed R: mTOR regulates memory CD8 T-cell differentiation. Nature. 460:108–112. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Klemm F, Maas RR, Bowman RL, Kornete M, Soukup K, Nassiri S, Brouland JP, Iacobuzio-Donahue CA, Brennan C, Tabar V, et al: Interrogation of the microenvironmental landscape in brain tumors reveals disease-specific alterations of immune cells. Cell. 181:1643–1660.e17. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Cabrita R, Lauss M, Sanna A, Donia M, Skaarup Larsen M, Mitra S, Johansson I, Phung B, Harbst K, Vallon-Christersson J, et al: Tertiary lymphoid structures improve immunotherapy and survival in melanoma. Nature. 577:561–565. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Connolly KA, Kuchroo M, Venkat A, Khatun A, Wang J, William I, Hornick NI, Fitzgerald BL, Damo M, Kasmani MY, et al: A reservoir of stem-like CD8+ T cells in the tumor-draining lymph node preserves the ongoing antitumor immune response. Sci Immunol. 6:eabg78362021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Prokhnevska N, Cardenas MA, Valanparambil RM, Sobierajska E, Barwick BG, Jansen C, Reyes Moon A, Gregorova P, delBalzo L, Greenwald R, et al: CD8+ T cell activation in cancer comprises an initial activation phase in lymph nodes followed by effector differentiation within the tumor. Immunity. 56:107–124.e5. 2023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Nagasaki J, Inozume T, Sax N, Ariyasu R, Ishikawa M, Yamashita K, Kawazu M, Ueno T, Irie T, Tanji E, et al: PD-1 blockade therapy promotes infiltration of tumor-attacking exhausted T cell clonotypes. Cell Rep. 38:1103312022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Pai JA, Hellmann MD, Sauter JL, Mattar M, Rizvi H, Woo HJ, Shah N, Nguyen EM, Uddin FZ, Quintanal-Villalonga A, et al: Lineage tracing reveals clonal progenitors and long-term persistence of tumor-specific T cells during immune checkpoint blockade. Cancer Cell. 41:776–790.e7. 2023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Liang H, Huang J, Li H, He W, Ao X, Xie Z, Chen Y, Lv Z, Zhang L, Zhong Y, et al: Spatial proximity of CD8+ T cells to tumor cells predicts neoadjuvant therapy efficacy in breast cancer. NPJ Breast Cancer. 11:132025. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Galon J, Costes A, Sanchez-Cabo F, Kirilovsky A, Mlecnik B, Lagorce-Pagès C, Tosolini M, Camus M, Berger A, Wind P, et al: Type, density, and location of immune cells within human colorectal tumors predict clinical outcome. Science. 313:1960–1964. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Pagès F, Mlecnik B, Marliot F, Bindea G, Ou FS, Bifulco C, Lugli A, Zlobec I, Rau TT, Berger MD, et al: International validation of the consensus Immunoscore for the classification of colon cancer: A prognostic and accuracy study. Lancet. 391:2128–2139. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Angell HK, Bruni D, Barrett JC, Herbst R and Galon J: The immunoscore: Colon cancer and beyond. Clin Cancer Res. 26:332–339. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Sen DR, Kaminski J, Barnitz RA, Kurachi M, Gerdemann U, Yates KB, Tsao HW, Godec J, LaFleur MW, Brown FD, et al: The epigenetic landscape of T cell exhaustion. Science. 354:1165–1169. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Reina-Campos M, Scharping NE and Goldrath AW: CD8+ T cell metabolism in infection and cancer. Nat Rev Immunol. 21:718–738. 2021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Zhu J and Thompson CB: Metabolic regulation of cell growth and proliferation. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 20:436–450. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Brand A, Singer K, Koehl GE, Kolitzus M, Schoenhammer G, Thiel A, Matos C, Bruss C, Klobuch S, Peter K, et al: LDHA-associated lactic acid production blunts tumor immunosurveillance by T and NK cells. Cell Metab. 24:657–671. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Vigano S, Alatzoglou D, Irving M, Ménétrier-Caux C, Caux C, Romero P and Coukos G: Targeting adenosine in cancer immunotherapy to enhance T-cell function. Front Immunol. 10:9252019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Qin M, Hamanishi J, Ukita M, Yamanoi K, Takamatsu S, Abiko K, Murakami R, Miyamoto T, Suzuki H, Ueda A, et al: Tertiary lymphoid structures are associated with favorable survival outcomes in patients with endometrial cancer. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 71:1431–1442. 2022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Zhang MJ, Wen Y and Sun ZJ: The impact of metabolic reprogramming on tertiary lymphoid structure formation: Enhancing cancer immunotherapy. BMC Med. 23:2172025. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Jia D, Wang Q, Qi Y, Jiang Y, He J, Lin Y, Sun Y, Xu J, Chen W, Fan L, et al: Microbial metabolite enhances immunotherapy efficacy by modulating T cell stemness in pan-cancer. Cell. 187:1651–1665.e21. 2024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Guo Y, Xie YQ, Gao M, Zhao Y, Franco F, Wenes M, Siddiqui I, Bevilacqua A, Wang H, Yang H, et al: Metabolic reprogramming of terminally exhausted CD8+ T cells by IL-10 enhances anti-tumor immunity. Nat Immunol. 22:746–756. 2021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Sukumar M, Kishton RJ and Restifo NP: Metabolic repro-graming of anti-tumor immunity. Curr Opin Immunol. 46:14–22. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Scharping NE, Menk AV, Moreci RS, Whetstone RD, Dadey RE, Watkins SC, Ferris RL and Delgoffe GM: The tumor microenvironment represses T cell mitochondrial biogenesis to drive intratumoral T cell metabolic insufficiency and dysfunction. Immunity. 45:374–388. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Dumauthioz N, Tschumi B, Wenes M, Marti B, Wang H, Franco F, Li W, Lopez-Mejia IC, Fajas L, Ho PC, et al: Enforced PGC-1α expression promotes CD8 T cell fitness, memory formation and antitumor immunity. Cell Mol Immunol. 18:1761–1771. 2021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Song M, Sandoval TA, Chae CS, Chopra S, Tan C, Rutkowski MR, Raundhal M, Chaurio RA, Payne KK, Konrad C, et al: IRE1α-XBP1 controls T cell function in ovarian cancer by regulating mitochondrial activity. Nature. 562:423–428. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Cham CM, Driessens G, O'Keefe JP and Gajewski TF: Glucose deprivation inhibits multiple key gene expression events and effector functions in CD8+ T cells. Eur J Immunol. 38:2438–2450. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Wenes M, Jaccard A, Wyss T, Maldonado-Pérez N, Teoh ST, Lepez A, Renaud F, Franco F, Waridel P, Yacoub Maroun C, et al: The mitochondrial pyruvate carrier regulates memory T cell differentiation and antitumor function. Cell Metab. 34:731–746.e9. 2022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Nava Lauson CB, Tiberti S, Corsetto PA, Conte F, Tyagi P, Machwirth M, Ebert S, Loffreda A, Scheller L, Sheta D, et al: Linoleic acid potentiates CD8+ T cell metabolic fitness and antitumor immunity. Cell Metab. 35:633–650.e9. 2023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Tang Y, Chen Z, Zuo Q and Kang Y: Regulation of CD8+ T cells by lipid metabolism in cancer progression. Cell Mol Immunol. 21:1215–1230. 2024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Pauken KE and Wherry EJ: Overcoming T cell exhaustion in infection and cancer. Trends Immunol. 36:265–276. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Greenwald RJ, Freeman GJ and Sharpe AH: The B7 family revisited. Annu Rev Immunol. 23:515–548. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Patsoukis N, Bardhan K, Chatterjee P, Sari D, Liu B, Bell LN, Karoly ED, Freeman GJ, Petkova V, Seth P, et al: PD-1 alters T-cell metabolic reprogramming by inhibiting glycolysis and promoting lipolysis and fatty acid oxidation. Nat Commun. 6:66922015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Boussiotis VA and Patsoukis N: Effects of PD-1 signaling on immunometabolic reprogramming. Immunometabolism. 4:e2200072022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Baldanzi G: Immune checkpoint receptors signaling in T cells. Int J Mol Sci. 23:35292022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Zhao M, Yuan H, Yang G, Wang Y, Bu Y, Zhang H, Zhao L, Lv P, Yun H, Geng Y, et al: Tumour cell-expressed PD-L1 reprograms lipid metabolism via EGFR/ITGB4/SREBP1c signalling in liver cancer. JHEP Rep. 6:1010092024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Ma F, Liu X, Zhang Y, Tao Y, Zhao L, Abusalamah H, Huffman C, Harbison RA, Puram SV, Wang Y and Peng G: Tumor extracellular vesicle-derived PD-L1 promotes T cell senescence through lipid metabolism reprogramming. Sci Transl Med. 17:eadm72692025. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Ping Y, Shan J, Qin H, Li F, Qu J, Guo R, Han D, Jing W, Liu Y, Liu J, et al: PD-1 signaling limits expression of phospholipid phosphatase 1 and promotes intratumoral CD8+ T cell ferroptosis. Immunity. 57:2122–2139.e9. 2024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Alsayyah C, Singh MK, Morcillo-Parra MA, Cavellini L, Shai N, Schmitt C, Schuldiner M, Zalckvar E, Mallet A, Belgareh-Touzé N, et al: Mitofusin-mediated contacts between mitochondria and peroxisomes regulate mitochondrial fusion. PLoS Biol. 22:e30026022024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Sandoval H, Thiagarajan P, Dasgupta SK, Schumacher A, Prchal JT, Chen M and Wang J: Essential role for Nix in autophagic maturation of erythroid cells. Nature. 454:232–235. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Lu Y, Li Z, Zhang S, Zhang T, Liu Y and Zhang L: Cellular mitophagy: Mechanism, roles in diseases and small molecule pharmacological regulation. Theranostics. 13:736–766. 2023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Wang S, Long H, Hou L, Feng B, Ma Z, Wu Y, Zeng Y, Cai J, Zhang DW and Zhao G: The mitophagy pathway and its implications in human diseases. Signal Transduction Targeted Ther. 8:3042023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
White E, Lattime EC and Guo JY: Autophagy regulates stress responses, metabolism, and anticancer immunity. Trends Cancer. 7:778–789. 2021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Silwal P, Kim JK, Kim YJ and Jo EK: Mitochondrial reactive oxygen species: Double-edged weapon in host defense and pathological inflammation during infection. Front Immunol. 11:16492020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Mougiakakos D, Johansson CC, Jitschin R, Böttcher M and Kiessling R: Increased thioredoxin-1 production in human naturally occurring regulatory T cells confers enhanced tolerance to oxidative stress. Blood. 117:857–861. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Mougiakakos D, Johansson CC and Kiessling R: Naturally occurring regulatory T cells show reduced sensitivity toward oxidative stress-induced cell death. Blood. 113:3542–3545. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Seledtsov VI, Goncharov AG and Seledtsova GV: Clinically feasible approaches to potentiating cancer cell-based immunotherapies. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 11:851–869. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Weiskopf D, Schwanninger A, Weinberger B, Almanzar G, Parson W, Buus S, Lindner H and Grubeck-Loebenstein B: Oxidative stress can alter the antigenicity of immunodominant peptides. J Leukocyte Biol. 87:165–172. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Cheung EC and Vousden KH: The role of ROS in tumour development and progression. Nat Rev Cancer. 22:280–297. 2022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Hildeman DA, Mitchell T, Teague TK, Henson P, Day BJ, Kappler J and Marrack PC: Reactive oxygen species regulate activation-induced T cell apoptosis. Immunity. 10:735–744. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Bailly C: Regulation of PD-L1 expression on cancer cells with ROS-modulating drugs. Life Sci. 246:1174032020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Kuo CL, Ponneri Babuharisankar A, Lin YC, Lien HW, Lo YK, Chou HY, Tangeda V, Cheng LC, Cheng AN and Lee AY: Mitochondrial oxidative stress in the tumor microenvironment and cancer immunoescape: Foe or friend? J Biomed Sci. 29:742022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Deng H, Yang W, Zhou Z, Tian R, Lin L, Ma Y, Song J and Chen X: Targeted scavenging of extracellular ROS relieves suppressive immunogenic cell death. Nat Commun. 11:49512020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Kurniawan H, Franchina DG, Guerra L, Bonetti L, -Baguet LS, Grusdat M, Schlicker L, Hunewald O, Dostert C, Merz MP, et al: Glutathione restricts serine metabolism to preserve regulatory T cell function. Cell Metab. 31:920–936.e7. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Kyriakoudi S, Drousiotou A and Petrou PP: When the balance tips: Dysregulation of mitochondrial dynamics as a culprit in disease. Int J Mol Sci. 22:46172021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
de Brito OM and Scorrano L: Mitofusin 2 tethers endoplasmic reticulum to mitochondria. Nature. 456:605–610. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Buck MD, O'Sullivan D, Klein Geltink RI, Curtis JD, Chang CH, Sanin DE, Qiu J, Kretz O, Braas D, van der Windt GJ, et al: Mitochondrial dynamics controls T cell fate through metabolic programming. Cell. 166:63–76. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Picca A, Mankowski RT, Burman JL, Donisi L, Kim JS, Marzetti E and Leeuwenburgh C: Mitochondrial quality control mechanisms as molecular targets in cardiac ageing. Nat Rev Cardiol. 15:543–554. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Yang JF, Xing X, Luo L, Zhou XW, Feng JX, Huang KB, Liu H, Jin S, Liu YN, Zhang SH, et al: Mitochondria-ER contact mediated by MFN2-SERCA2 interaction supports CD8+ T cell metabolic fitness and function in tumors. Sci Immunol. 8:eabq24242023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Tilokani L, Nagashima S, Paupe V and Prudent J: Mitochondrial dynamics: Overview of molecular mechanisms. Essays Biochem. 62:341–360. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Menk AV, Scharping NE, Rivadeneira DB, Calderon MJ, Watson MJ, Dunstane D, Watkins SC and Delgoffe GM: 4-1BB costimulation induces T cell mitochondrial function and biogenesis enabling cancer immunotherapeutic responses. J Exp Med. 215:1091–1100. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Hu C, Huang Y and Li L: Drp1-dependent mitochondrial fission plays critical roles in physiological and pathological progresses in mammals. Int J Mol Sci. 18:1442017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Cereghetti GM, Stangherlin A, Martins De Brito O, Chang CR, Blackstone C, Bernardi P and Scorrano L: Dephosphorylation by calcineurin regulates translocation of Drp1 to mitochondria. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 105:15803–15808. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Smith-Garvin JE, Koretzky GA and Jordan MS: T cell activation. Annu Rev Immunol. 27:591–619. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Woehrle T, Ledderose C, Rink J, Slubowski C and Junger WG: Autocrine stimulation of P2Y1 receptors is part of the purinergic signaling mechanism that regulates T cell activation. Purinergic Signalling. 15:127–137. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Ledderose C, Bromberger S, Slubowski CJ, Sueyoshi K and Junger WG: Frontline science: P2Y11 receptors support T cell activation by directing mitochondrial trafficking to the immune synapse. J Leukocyte Biol. 109:497–508. 2021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Quintana A, Schwindling C, Wenning AS, Becherer U, Rettig J, Schwarz EC and Hoth M: T cell activation requires mitochondrial translocation to the immunological synapse. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 104:14418–14423. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Simula L, Pacella I, Colamatteo A, Procaccini C, Cancila V, Bordi M, Tregnago C, Corrado M, Pigazzi M, Barnaba V, et al: Drp1 controls effective T cell immune-surveillance by regulating T cell migration, proliferation, and cMyc-dependent metabolic reprogramming. Cell Rep. 25:3059–3073.e10. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Mohammadalipour A, Dumbali SP and Wenzel PL: Mitochondrial transfer and regulators of mesenchymal stromal cell function and therapeutic efficacy. Front Cell Dev Biol. 8:6032922020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Lambeth DO: What is the function of GTP produced in the Krebs citric acid cycle? IUBMB Life. 54:143–144. 2002.PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Saha T, Dash C, Jayabalan R, Khiste S, Kulkarni A, Kurmi K, Mondal J, Majumder PK, Bardia A, Jang HL and Sengupta S: Intercellular nanotubes mediate mitochondrial trafficking between cancer and immune cells. Nat Nanotechnol. 17:98–106. 2022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Baldwin JG, Heuser-Loy C, Saha T, Schelker RC, Slavkovic-Lukic D, Strieder N, Hernandez-Lopez I, Rana N, Barden M, Mastrogiovanni F, et al: Intercellular nanotube-mediated mitochondrial transfer enhances T cell metabolic fitness and antitumor efficacy. Cell. 187:6614–6630.e21. 2024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Monaghan RM and Whitmarsh AJ: Mitochondrial proteins moonlighting in the nucleus. Trends Biochem Sci. 40:728–735. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
English J, Son JM, Cardamone MD, Lee C and Perissi V: Decoding the rosetta stone of mitonuclear communication. Pharmacol Res. 161:1051612020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Quirós PM, Mottis A and Auwerx J: Mitonuclear communication in homeostasis and stress. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 17:213–226. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Whelan SP and Zuckerbraun BS: Mitochondrial signaling: Forwards, backwards, and in between. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2013:3516132013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Jazwinski SM: The retrograde response: A conserved compensatory reaction to damage from within and from without. Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci. 127:133–154. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Walker BR and Moraes CT: Nuclear-mitochondrial interactions. Biomolecules. 12:4272022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Ju YS, Alexandrov LB, Gerstung M, Martincorena I, Nik-Zainal S, Ramakrishna M, Davies HR, Papaemmanuil E, Gundem G, Shlien A, et al: Origins and functional consequences of somatic mitochondrial DNA mutations in human cancer. Elife. 3:e029352014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Chen S, Liao Z and Xu P: Mitochondrial control of innate immune responses. Front Immunol. 14:11662142023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Riley JS and Tait SW: Mitochondrial DNA in inflammation and immunity. EMBO Rep. 21:e497992020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Lin Y, Yang B, Huang Y, Zhang Y, Jiang Y, Ma L and Shen YQ: Mitochondrial DNA-targeted therapy: A novel approach to combat cancer. Cell Insight. 2:1001132023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
West AP, Shadel GS and Ghosh S: Mitochondria in innate immune responses. Nat Rev Immunol. 11:389–402. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
West AP, Khoury-Hanold W, Staron M, Tal MC, Pineda CM, Lang SM, Bestwick M, Duguay BA, Raimundo N, MacDuff DA, et al: Mitochondrial DNA stress primes the antiviral innate immune response. Nature. 520:553–557. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Shimada K, Crother TR, Karlin J, Dagvadorj J, Chiba N, Chen S, Ramanujan VK, Wolf AJ, Vergnes L, Ojcius DM, et al: Oxidized mitochondrial DNA activates the NLRP3 inflammasome during apoptosis. Immunity. 36:401–414. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
De Gaetano A, Solodka K, Zanini G, Selleri V, Mattioli AV, Nasi M and Pinti M: Molecular mechanisms of mtDNA-mediated inflammation. Cells. 10:28982021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Wang X, Zhang H, Wang Y, Bramasole L, Guo K, Mourtada F, Meul T, Hu Q, Viteri V, Kammerl I, et al: DNA sensing via the cGAS/STING pathway activates the immunoproteasome and adaptive T-cell immunity. EMBO J. 42:e1105972023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Cheng AN, Cheng LC, Kuo CL, Lo YK, Chou HY, Chen CH, Wang YH, Chuang TH, Cheng SJ and Lee AY: Mitochondrial lon-induced mtDNA leakage contributes to PD-L1-mediated immunoescape via STING-IFN signaling and extracellular vesicles. J Immunother Cancer. 8:e0013722020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Mahmood M, Liu EM, Shergold AL, Tolla E, Tait-Mulder J, Huerta-Uribe A, Shokry E, Young AL, Lilla S, Kim M, et al: Mitochondrial DNA mutations drive aerobic glycolysis to enhance checkpoint blockade response in melanoma. Nat Cancer. 5:659–672. 2024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Corrado M, Samardžić D, Giacomello M, Rana N, Pearce EL and Scorrano L: Deletion of the mitochondria-shaping protein Opa1 during early thymocyte maturation impacts mature memory T cell metabolism. Cell Death Differ. 28:2194–2206. 2021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Peng J, Hu X, Fan S, Zhou J, Ren S, Sun R and Chen Y, Shen X and Chen Y: Inhibition of mitochondrial biosynthesis using a ‘right-side-out’ membrane-camouflaged micelle to facilitate the therapeutic effects of shikonin on triple-negative breast cancer. Adv Healthc Mater. 11:e22007422022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Gemta LF, Siska PJ, Nelson ME, Gao X, Liu X, Locasale JW, Yagita H, Slingluff CL Jr, Hoehn KL, Rathmell JC and Bullock TNJ: Impaired enolase 1 glycolytic activity restrains effector functions of tumor-infiltrating CD8+ T cells. Sci Immunol. 4:eaap95202019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Al-Habsi M, Chamoto K, Matsumoto K, Nomura N, Zhang B, Sugiura Y, Sonomura K, Maharani A, Nakajima Y, Wu Y, et al: Spermidine activates mitochondrial trifunctional protein and improves antitumor immunity in mice. Science. 378:eabj35102022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Cronin SJF, Seehus C, Weidinger A, Talbot S, Reissig S, Seifert M, Pierson Y, McNeill E, Longhi MS, Turnes BL, et al: The metabolite BH4 controls T cell proliferation in autoimmunity and cancer. Nature. 563:564–568. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Malinee M, Pandian GN and Sugiyama H: Targeted epigenetic induction of mitochondrial biogenesis enhances antitumor immunity in mouse model. Cell Chem Biol. 29:463–475.e6. 2022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Chamoto K, Chowdhury PS, Kumar A, Sonomura K, Matsuda F, Fagarasan S and Honjo T: Mitochondrial activation chemicals synergize with surface receptor PD-1 blockade for T cell-dependent antitumor activity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 114:E761–E770. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Zhang Y, Kurupati R, Liu L, Zhou XY, Zhang G, Hudaihed A, Filisio F, Giles-Davis W, Xu X, Karakousis GC, et al: Enhancing CD8+ T cell fatty acid catabolism within a metabolically challenging tumor microenvironment increases the efficacy of melanoma immunotherapy. Cancer Cell. 32:377–391.e9. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
He J, Shangguan X, Zhou W, Cao Y, Zheng Q, Tu J, Hu G, Liang Z, Jiang C, Deng L, et al: Glucose limitation activates AMPK coupled SENP1-Sirt3 signalling in mitochondria for T cell memory development. Nat Commun. 12:43712021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Yuan S, Sun R, Shi H, Chapman NM, Hu H, Guy C, Rankin S, Kc A, Palacios G, Meng X, et al: VDAC2 loss elicits tumour destruction and inflammation for cancer therapy. Nature. 640:1062–1071. 2025. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Liu YN, Yang JF, Huang DJ, Ni HH, Zhang CX, Zhang L, He J, Gu JM, Chen HX, Mai HQ, et al: Hypoxia induces mitochondrial defect that promotes T cell exhaustion in tumor microenvironment through MYC-regulated pathways. Front Immunol. 11:19062020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Teijeira A, Labiano S, Garasa S, Etxeberria I, Santamaría E, Rouzaut A, Enamorado M, Azpilikueta A, Inoges S, Bolaños E, et al: Mitochondrial morphological and functional reprogramming following CD137 (4-1BB) costimulation. Cancer Immunol Res. 6:798–811. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Wan H, Xu B, Zhu N and Ren B: PGC-1α activator-induced fatty acid oxidation in tumor-infiltrating CTLs enhances effects of PD-1 blockade therapy in lung cancer. Tumori. 106:55–63. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Chowdhury PS, Chamoto K, Kumar A and Honjo T: PPAR-induced fatty acid oxidation in T cells increases the number of tumor-reactive CD8+ T cells and facilitates anti-PD-1 therapy. Cancer Immunol Res. 6:1375–1387. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Bukoreshtliev NV, Wang X, Hodneland E, Gurke S, Barroso JFV and Gerdes HH: Selective block of tunneling nanotube (TNT) formation inhibits intercellular organelle transfer between PC12 cells. FEBS Lett. 583:1481–1488. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Liu K, Ji K, Guo L, Wu W, Lu H, Shan P and Yan C: Mesenchymal stem cells rescue injured endothelial cells in an in vitro ischemia-reperfusion model via tunneling nanotube like structure-mediated mitochondrial transfer. Microvasc Res. 92:10–18. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Onfelt B, Nedvetzki S, Benninger RKP, Purbhoo MA, Sowinski S, Hume AN, Seabra MC, Neil MA, French PM and Davis DM: Structurally distinct membrane nanotubes between human macrophages support long-distance vesicular traffic or surfing of bacteria. J Immunol. 177:8476–8483. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Zhang H, Yu X, Ye J, Li H, Hu J, Tan Y, Fang Y, Akbay E, Yu F, Weng C, et al: Systematic investigation of mitochondrial transfer between cancer cells and T cells at single-cell resolution. Cancer Cell. 41:1788–1802.e10. 2023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Pierini S, Fang C, Rafail S, Facciponte JG, Huang J, De Sanctis F, Morgan MA, Uribe-Herranz M, Tanyi JL and Facciabene A: A tumor mitochondria vaccine protects against experimental renal cell carcinoma. J Immunol. 195:4020–4027. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Shang L, Jiang X, Zhao X, Huang X, Wang X, Jiang X, Kong X, Yao M, Jiang S and Wong PP: Mitochondrial DNA-boosted dendritic cell-based nanovaccination triggers antitumor immunity in lung and pancreatic cancers. Cell Rep Med. 5:1016482024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Mok BY, de Moraes MH, Zeng J, Bosch DE, Kotrys AV, Raguram A, Hsu F, Radey MC, Peterson SB, Mootha VK, et al: A bacterial cytidine deaminase toxin enables CRISPR-free mitochondrial base editing. Nature. 583:631–637. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Fan Y, Xu W, Gao BQ, Qin H, Wu X, Wei J, Ni Q, Zhou L, Xiang J, Wu J, et al: Leveraging base excision repair for efficient adenine base editing of mitochondrial DNA. Nat Biotechnol. Mar 25–2025.(Epub ahead of print). View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Guo Y, Zhang H, Yan C, Shen B, Zhang Y, Guo X, Sun S, Yu F, Yan J, Liu R, et al: Small molecule agonist of mitochondrial fusion repairs mitochondrial dysfunction. Nat Chem Biol. 19:468–477. 2023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Chen L, Fan Y, Jiang N, Huang X, Yu M, Zhang H, Xu Z, He D, Wang Y, Ding C, et al: An energy metabolism-engaged nanomedicine maintains mitochondrial homeostasis to alleviate cellular ageing. Nat Nanotechnol. 20:1332–1344. 2025. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Pan X, Wang Z, Tan M, Fu Z, Nie G and Wang H: Nanoinducer-mediated mitochondria-selective degradation enhances T cell immunotherapy against multiple cancers. Nat Nanotechnol. 20:947–958. 2025. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Lv Y, Song B, Yang G, Wang Y, Wu Z, Si M, Yang Z, Chen H, Liu C, Li M, et al: In situ transformable nanoparticle effectively suppresses bladder cancer by damaging mitochondria and blocking mitochondrial autophagy flux. Adv Sci (Weinh). 12:e24094252025. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Wang W, Yao SY, Luo J, Ding C, Huang Q, Yang Y, Shi Z, Lin J, Pan YC, Zeng X, et al: Engineered hypoxia-responsive albumin nanoparticles mediating mitophagy regulation for cancer therapy. Nat Commun. 16:5962025. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Liu J, Yan Y, Zhang Y, Pan X, Xia H, Zhou J, Wan F, Huang X, Zhang W, Zhang Q, et al: Lysosome-mitochondria cascade targeting nanoparticle drives robust pyroptosis for cancer immunotherapy. J Am Chem Soc. 146:34568–34582. 2024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Pei D and Buyanova M: Overcoming endosomal entrapment in drug delivery. Bioconjug Chem. 30:273–283. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Goswami R, Jeon T, Nagaraj H, Zhai S and Rotello VM: Accessing intracellular targets through nanocarrier-mediated cytosolic protein delivery. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 41:743–754. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Kang H, Han M, Xue J, Baek Y, Chang J, Hu S, Nam H, Jo MJ, El Fakhri G, Hutchens MP, et al: Renal clearable nanochelators for iron overload therapy. Nat Commun. 10:51342019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Feng K, Xu Z, Wang Y, Wu X, Xiong F, Ruan Y, Wu X, Ye L, Su D, Yu J and Sun X: Renal-clearable porous hollow copper iron oxide nanoparticles for trimodal chemodynamic-photothermal-chemo anti-tumor therapy. Nanoscale. 15:3188–3198. 2023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI |