International Journal of Molecular Medicine is an international journal devoted to molecular mechanisms of human disease.
International Journal of Oncology is an international journal devoted to oncology research and cancer treatment.
Covers molecular medicine topics such as pharmacology, pathology, genetics, neuroscience, infectious diseases, molecular cardiology, and molecular surgery.
Oncology Reports is an international journal devoted to fundamental and applied research in Oncology.
Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine is an international journal devoted to laboratory and clinical medicine.
Oncology Letters is an international journal devoted to Experimental and Clinical Oncology.
Explores a wide range of biological and medical fields, including pharmacology, genetics, microbiology, neuroscience, and molecular cardiology.
International journal addressing all aspects of oncology research, from tumorigenesis and oncogenes to chemotherapy and metastasis.
Multidisciplinary open-access journal spanning biochemistry, genetics, neuroscience, environmental health, and synthetic biology.
Open-access journal combining biochemistry, pharmacology, immunology, and genetics to advance health through functional nutrition.
Publishes open-access research on using epigenetics to advance understanding and treatment of human disease.
An International Open Access Journal Devoted to General Medicine.
The fascinating roots of nanotechnology can be connected with physicist, Richard Feynman, a great pioneer in the field. In his groundbreaking 1959 speech, ‘There's Plenty of Room at the Bottom’, Feynman introduced the noteworthy concept of regulating and influencing matter at the atomic and molecular scale (1). He envisioned the creation of miniaturised devices and materials at the nanoscale, setting the stage for remarkable advancements. The term nanotechnology was officially coined later, although its spirit was adopted by the Japanese scientist, Norio Taniguchi, in 1974, who examined the precise fabrication of nanoscale materials. The visionary work of Taniguchi focused on processes that could be finely tuned at the atomic level (2,3). Building on this foundation, the American engineer, Eric Drexler, further advanced the concept of molecular nanotechnology in the 1980s. The influential book of Drexler in 1986 entitled ‘Engines of Creation’ (4) explored the possibilities of constructing intricate structures at the atomic level using molecular machines, inspired by the pioneering theories of Feynman. Nanoparticles are tiny particles with dimensions between 1 and 100 nanometres, which possess distinctive characteristics due to their very small size and outstanding surface-to-volume ratio (5-7). These properties, which are often non-uniform compared with those of bulk materials, render nanoparticles highly valuable in various fields (8). For example, metal nanoparticles (MetNPs), such as gold and silver exhibit superior optical (9) and catalytic (10) behaviour due to surface plasmon resonance, while metal oxide nanoparticles (MONPs), such as titanium dioxide (TiO2) and zinc oxide (ZnO) are widely used in photocatalysis (11) and environmental remediation (12). Carbon-based nanoparticles (CBNPs), including carbon nanotubes (CNTs) and graphene, exhibit marked electrical conductivity and mechanical strength, leading to their use in electronics and materials science. Nanoparticles are synthesised using top-down approaches, such as mechanical milling or bottom-up methods such as chemical vapour deposition (13,14). Their high reactivity and surface energy allow their advanced utilisation in fields, such as medicine, energy and environmental protection, where they play key roles in catalysis, drug delivery and pollutant removal. MetNPs such as gold, silver, selenium and iron synthesised through green methods have immense potential due to their ability to be modified with various chemical functional groups. This functionalisation permits their conjugation with antibodies, ligands and drugs, opening avenues for targeted drug delivery, gene therapy, and diagnostic imaging. Additionally, these nanoparticles play essential roles in biotechnology, particularly in magnetic separation, pre-concentration of target analytes, and the development of vehicles for drug and gene delivery (15,16). There are various properties of nanoparticles. To strengthen the conceptual organisation of the present review, a functionality-based classification of nanoparticles is introduced (Table I), categorising them according to their primary operational roles rather than composition alone. This framework classifies nanoparticles into catalytic, adsorptive, optical, magnetic, mechanical-reinforcement, electrochemical, antimicrobial, biocompatible and sensor-specific nanoparticles.
The small size of nanoparticles leads to a large surface area relative to volume, which enhances reactivity and interaction with other substances. This makes nanoparticles highly effective in catalysis and adsorption processes (17,18).
At the nanoscale, quantum mechanics begins to dominate material behaviour, leading to unique optical, electronic and magnetic properties that are not present in larger particles (19).
Nanoparticles possess higher surface energy, which can affect their stability and reactivity. As a result, they tend to agglomerate to reduce surface energy, but can be stabilised through surface treatments or coatings (20).
Some nanoparticles, such as CNTs, exhibit exceptional mechanical properties, such as high tensile strength and flexibility (21).
Nanoparticles can exhibit unique optical properties due to surface plasmon resonance, particularly in metals such as gold and silver, rendering them useful in imaging, sensing and photothermal applications (19).
Major developments in the field of MetNPs include a transition from early physical and chemical synthesis methods to modern green, biogenic methods that provide sustainable and eco-friendly production (Table II). Advances in nanoscale characterisation and mechanistic understanding have enabled greater control over particle size, shape and surface chemistry. These breakthroughs have led to rapid growth in applications such as biomedicine, catalysis, sensing, and environmental remediation, with recent advances focusing on the synthesis of hybrid nanocomposites and nanozymes.
MetNPs are metallic particles ranging from 1 to 100 nanometres in size and exhibit unique physical, chemical and optical properties that differ significantly from their bulk counterparts. These properties arise from their high surface-area-to-volume ratio and quantum effects, making them highly versatile across various fields (22). The size, shape and surface characteristics of MetNPs can be tailored during synthesis, influencing reactivity, catalytic activity, and optical behaviour (23). Common types include gold nanoparticles, known for their biocompatibility and use in medical diagnostics and drug delivery; silver nanoparticles, widely used for antimicrobial properties; and iron nanoparticles, effective in environmental remediation. Platinum and copper nanoparticles are valued for their catalytic and electrical properties, respectively. The applications of MetNPs span diverse areas. In environmental remediation, they are used for heavy metal removal, the degradation of organic pollutants and the catalytic breakdown of contaminants (24). In medicine, they serve as drug delivery agents, imaging tools and antimicrobial agents. Their role in energy applications includes use in fuel cells and batteries, while in sensors and diagnostics they enhance disease detection and environmental monitoring (25). MetNPs are synthesised using chemical, physical and biological methods, including chemical reduction of metal salts, laser ablation and green synthesis using plant extracts or microorganisms. However, stability issues, potential toxicity and scalability concerns need to be addressed to fully harness their potential. Despite these challenges, MetNPs represent a promising avenue for innovation across multiple industries.
MONPs are a class of nanomaterials consisting of metal cations bonded to oxygen anions. These nanoparticles exhibit exceptional properties, including high stability, catalytic activity, and tuneable electronic, magnetic and optical characteristics. Their unique properties are attributed to their small size, high surface-area-to-volume ratio, and quantum confinement effects, rendering them highly desirable in various scientific and industrial applications. MONPs are synthesised from a wide variety of metals, with some of the most common types being TiO2, ZnO, iron oxide (Fe2O3/Fe3O4), cerium oxide (CeO2) and aluminium oxide (Al2O3). TiO2 is widely used for its photocatalytic activity in environmental remediation and self-cleaning surfaces (26). ZnO is prized for its antimicrobial properties and applications in sunscreens and sensors. Iron oxide nanoparticles, particularly magnetite (Fe3O4), are utilised in biomedical applications, such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and targeted drug delivery. CeO2 is known for its role as a redox catalyst, particularly in automotive catalytic converters and as an antioxidant in biological systems (27). The applications of MONPs span a range of fields. In environmental science, they are employed for water and air purification, as well as for the degradation of organic pollutants through photocatalytic processes (28,29). In the medical field, they play a role in drug delivery, imaging, and antimicrobial treatments (30). MONPs are also extensively used in energy storage and conversion devices, such as lithium-ion batteries, supercapacitors, and fuel cells (31). Their catalytic properties make them essential in industrial chemical processes, including the production of fertilisers and the refinement of fuels. Several synthesis methods are used to produce MONPs, including sol-gel processes, hydrothermal methods, chemical vapor deposition, and green synthesis using biological agents (32). These methods allow control over the size, shape and surface characteristics of the nanoparticles, which are critical for optimising their performance in specific applications. Despite their advantages, MONPs pose challenges, such as potential toxicity, environmental persistence and the need for cost-effective and scalable production methods (33). Addressing these challenges is essential for their safe and sustainable use across various sectors, highlighting their potential to revolutionise industries ranging from healthcare to environmental management.
CBNPs are nanomaterials composed primarily of carbon atoms, engineered in various structures and dimensions. These nanoparticles exhibit notable mechanical, electrical, thermal and chemical properties, rendering them a cornerstone of nanotechnology research and applications. Their versatility stems from the unique bonding nature of carbon, which allows them to form various allotropes and hybrid structures (34). Key types of CBNPs include CNTs, fullerenes, graphene, graphene oxide, carbon dots (CDs) and nanodiamonds. CNTs are cylindrical structures with extraordinary tensile strength, electrical conductivity, and thermal stability, making them valuable in electronics, materials reinforcement, and energy storage (21). Fullerenes, spherical carbon molecules, are known for their electron-accepting capabilities and are used in drug delivery, solar cells and antioxidants. Graphene is a two-dimensional sheet of carbon atoms arranged in a hexagonal lattice, renowned for its high electrical and thermal conductivity, flexibility, and strength, leading to applications in flexible electronics, sensors and advanced composites (34). CDs are fluorescent nanoparticles with tuneable optical properties, commonly used in bioimaging and sensing. Nanodiamonds exhibit exceptional hardness and biocompatibility, making them ideal for polishing, drug delivery, and imaging (35). The applications of CBNPs span multiple disciplines. In medicine, they serve as drug delivery agents, bioimaging tools and antimicrobial materials. In electronics, they are employed in transistors, flexible displays and conductive coatings. Their thermal properties render them useful in heat management systems, while their mechanical strength is exploited in the development of advanced composites. Environmental applications include water purification, pollutant adsorption and catalysis for pollutant degradation. Additionally, their role in energy storage and conversion, such as in batteries, supercapacitors, and fuel cells, highlights their importance in renewable energy technologies. CBNPs are synthesised through various techniques, including chemical vapor deposition, laser ablation, arc discharge and green synthesis using biological agents. These methods allow control over their size, structure and functionalisation, which are critical for tailoring them to specific applications. However, challenges, such as production scalability, cost, potential toxicity and environmental impact need to be addressed. Despite these obstacles, CBNPs represent a transformative class of nanomaterials, with the potential to drive advancements in science, technology and industry (29,33-35).
PNPs are nano-sized particles composed of polymers, typically ranging in size from 1 to 1,000 nanometres. These nanoparticles are highly versatile and can be engineered for a wide range of applications due to their biocompatibility, chemical tunability, and ability to encapsulate and protect active agents. Their structure often includes a polymeric core and shell, which can be functionalised to enhance stability, target specificity and controlled-release properties. PNPs are categorised into different types based on their structure. Nanospheres are solid matrix-like particles in which the active compound is dispersed or adsorbed throughout the polymer matrix. Nanocapsules, on the other hand, are vesicular systems in which the active agent is enclosed within a polymeric shell (36,37). The polymers used in PNP synthesis can be natural (e.g., chitosan, gelatin and alginate) or synthetic [e.g., polylactic acid, polyglycolic acid and poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid)] and are selected based on the intended application and required properties (38). The applications of PNPs are vast, with their most prominent role in the biomedical field. They are widely used as drug delivery systems, enabling the encapsulation of therapeutic agents for enhanced solubility, stability and targeted delivery. Their ability to release drugs in a controlled manner reduces side-effects and improves therapeutic efficacy. In cancer therapy, PNPs can be designed to deliver chemotherapeutics directly to tumour cells, minimising damage to healthy tissues (36,39). They are also used in gene therapy, vaccine delivery and tissue engineering. Beyond medicine, PNPs are employed in the food industry for the controlled release of nutrients and additives, in agriculture for the delivery of pesticides and fertilisers, and in environmental applications for pollutant removal. Synthesis methods for PNPs include emulsion techniques (single or double emulsion), precipitation, solvent evaporation, and ionic gelation, among others. These methods allow the precise control over particle size, shape and surface properties. The functionalisation of the nanoparticle surface with ligands or coatings further enhances their ability to target specific cells or tissues, a feature particularly valuable in medical applications. Despite their advantages, challenges remain in the use of PNPs, such as scaling up production, ensuring uniformity, and addressing potential environmental and biological toxicity. Advances in polymer chemistry and nanoparticle engineering continue to overcome these hurdles, rendering PNPs a key player in modern nanotechnology and materials science. Their adaptability and functionality promise significant contributions across diverse industries, from healthcare to environmental sustainability (37,39-42).
LNPs are nanoscale structures composed of lipids, typically ranging in size from 10 to 1,000 nanometres. They have garnered significant attention due to their biocompatibility, ability to encapsulate hydrophilic and hydrophobic molecules and potential for targeted delivery. Their unique properties render them indispensable in drug delivery systems, particularly for delivering challenging therapeutic agents such as nucleic acids and poorly soluble drugs. The structure of LNPs generally includes a lipid bilayer or a core-shell configuration, in which a hydrophobic core is surrounded by a lipid shell (43-45). Common types of LNPs include liposomes, solid lipid nanoparticles (SLNs) and nanostructured lipid carriers (NLCs). Liposomes are spherical vesicles with one or more lipid bilayers, capable of encapsulating hydrophilic drugs in their aqueous core and hydrophobic drugs within their lipid bilayer (46). SLNs are composed of a solid lipid core stabilised by surfactants, providing a highly stable system for drug encapsulation. NLCs are an advanced version of SLNs, incorporating both solid and liquid lipids to improve drug-loading and release characteristics. LNPs are widely used in the pharmaceutical and biomedical fields. They play a crucial role in the delivery of small molecules, peptides, proteins and nucleic acids, providing protection from enzymatic degradation and enhancing cellular uptake. LNPs have revolutionised the field of gene therapy and mRNA vaccines, as demonstrated by their use in COVID-19 mRNA vaccines (43,46-48). In cancer therapy, they enable targeted delivery of chemotherapeutics to tumour cells while minimising systemic toxicity. Beyond healthcare, LNPs are applied in cosmetics for enhanced skin delivery, in agriculture for the delivery of pesticides and fertilisers, and in food technology for encapsulating nutrients and bioactives. The synthesis of LNPs involves methods, such as thin-film hydration, microfluidics, high-pressure homogenisation and solvent evaporation (38). These techniques allow for the precise control over particle size, surface charge and encapsulation efficiency. Surface functionalisation with ligands, such as antibodies or peptides, enables targeted delivery to specific cells or tissues, enhancing therapeutic efficacy. While LNPs offer numerous advantages, challenges persist, including stability issues, scalability for industrial production and potential immunogenicity (49,50). Addressing these challenges through advances in lipid chemistry and nanotechnology will further enhance their efficacy and broaden their applications. LNPs continue to be a cornerstone of modern nanomedicine and materials science, with the potential to address unmet needs in healthcare, agriculture and beyond.
Semiconductor nanoparticles, commonly known as QDs, are nanometre-scale crystals typically ranging from 2 to 10 nanometres in size. These nanoparticles exhibit unique quantum mechanical properties, particularly quantum confinement, which arises when the particle size is smaller than the exciton Bohr radius. This confinement results in discrete energy levels and size-dependent optical and electronic properties, rendering QDs highly versatile in various applications. QDs are composed of semiconductor materials such as cadmium selenide (CdSe), cadmium telluride (CdTe), indium phosphide (InP) and zinc sulfide (ZnS). Their most notable property is their size-tuneable fluorescence; by varying the particle size, QDs can emit light across the visible to infrared spectrum (9). This property, combined with their high photostability, broad absorption spectra, and narrow emission peaks, renders QDs invaluable for imaging and optoelectronic applications. The applications of QDs span multiple fields. In biomedicine, they are widely used as fluorescent probes for bioimaging and biosensing due to their brightness and resistance to photobleaching. QDs are instrumental in the development of advanced diagnostics, enabling high-resolution imaging of cellular and molecular processes. In optoelectronics, QDs are employed in QD light-emitting diodes (QD-LEDs), offering vibrant displays with superior colour accuracy and energy efficiency (9,35). They are also used in solar cells to improve light absorption and energy conversion efficiency, as well as in lasers and photodetectors. In environmental science, QDs are used in sensors for detecting pollutants and toxins, as well as in photocatalysis for water and air purification. QDs are typically synthesised using methods such as colloidal synthesis, chemical vapour deposition, molecular beam epitaxy, and microemulsion techniques. These methods allow precise control over particle size, composition, and surface properties, which are crucial for tuning their optical and electronic characteristics. Surface modification and functionalisation of QDs are often employed to improve their stability, biocompatibility, and specificity for targeted applications (51,52). Despite their advantages, the widespread use of QDs faces challenges. A number of QDs are made from heavy metals, such as cadmium, raising concerns about environmental toxicity and biocompatibility. Research is ongoing to develop eco-friendly and non-toxic alternatives, such as graphene and silicon QDs. Additionally, achieving cost-effective and scalable production remains a focus of current efforts. QDs represent a transformative class of materials with immense potential to impact science and technology. Their unique properties and adaptability make them a cornerstone of advancements in imaging, electronics, renewable energy and environmental applications (9,19).
Ceramic nanoparticles are nanoscale materials made from inorganic, non-metallic solids, such as oxides, carbides, nitrides, or silicates. Typically ranging in size from 1 to 100 nanometres, these particles are characterised by their high stability, hardness, chemical inertness, and resistance to heat and corrosion. Their properties can be finely tuned by controlling their size, composition and morphology, rendering them highly versatile in various scientific and industrial applications (53). Common types of ceramic nanoparticles include TiO2, Al2O3, silicon dioxide (SiO2), zirconium dioxide (ZrO2) and magnesium oxide (MgO). These materials exhibit diverse properties, such as photocatalytic activity, thermal conductivity, and electrical insulation. For instance, TiO2 is widely used for its photocatalytic and UV-blocking properties, while SiO2 finds applications in reinforcement, electronics and drug delivery (54,55). Ceramic nanoparticles are utilised in a broad range of fields. In medicine, they serve as carriers for drug delivery, imaging agents in diagnostics, and materials for bone and dental tissue engineering. Their biocompatibility and ability to be functionalised make them suitable for these applications. In environmental science, they are employed for water purification, pollutant adsorption, and photocatalysis for the degradation of organic contaminants. In electronics, ceramic nanoparticles enhance the properties of devices such as capacitors, sensors, and thermal insulators. In industrial applications, they are used as additives to improve the mechanical strength, heat resistance, and durability of materials such as coatings, paints, and polymers (56,57). Furthermore, they are integral to the development of advanced ceramics for high-performance applications in the aerospace, automotive and energy industries. Synthesis methods for ceramic nanoparticles include sol-gel processes, hydrothermal synthesis, flame spray pyrolysis and mechanical milling. These methods enable precise control over particle size, morphology, and composition. Surface functionalisation techniques are often employed to enhance their dispersibility and compatibility with specific environments or applications. Despite their advantages, ceramic nanoparticles face challenges, such as aggregation, which can reduce their effectiveness, and concerns regarding their environmental and biological impacts. Addressing these challenges through improved synthesis techniques and comprehensive toxicity assessments is essential for their sustainable and safe use. Ceramic nanoparticles represent a critical class of materials with wide-ranging applications due to their unique physical and chemical properties. As research and technology advance, they continue to play a crucial role in addressing challenges across healthcare, environmental management, energy storage and materials engineering (53,58,59)
MNPs are nanoscale particles that exhibit magnetic properties due to their composition of magnetic materials such as iron oxide (magnetite Fe3O4 or maghemite γ-Fe3O4), cobalt, or nickel. These particles display unique characteristics, including superparamagnetism, whereby they exhibit strong magnetisation only in the presence of an external magnetic field and lose their magnetisation when the field is removed. This property, along with their high surface-area-to-volume ratio, makes them highly versatile for various applications. MNPs are often engineered with a core-shell structure, in which the core consists of a magnetic material and the shell is coated with substances such as silica, polymers, or carbon to enhance stability, biocompatibility, and dispersibility. These features render MNPs particularly suitable for biomedical, environmental and industrial applications (25). In the biomedical field, MNPs are widely used for drug delivery, where they function as carriers to transport drugs to specific sites in the body, guided by an external magnetic field. They are also employed in hyperthermia therapy, in which they generate localised heat under an alternating magnetic field to destroy tumour cells, and as contrast agents in MRI to improve imaging quality (60). Additionally, MNPs play a role in biosensing, aiding in the detection of biomolecules in diagnostic assays. In environmental science, MNPs are effective in water treatment, as they can remove heavy metals, organic pollutants and oil spills. They are also used as catalysts for pollutant degradation. In technology, MNPs are integral to high-density data storage and spintronics due to their exceptional magnetic properties. In industrial applications, they are used in magnetic fluids for seals, damping systems, and actuators, as well as in catalysis for chemical synthesis (61). MNPs are synthesised using various methods, such as co-precipitation, thermal decomposition, sol-gel synthesis and hydrothermal techniques, which allow precise control over their size, composition and surface properties. The functionalisation of their surface is often performed to attach specific ligands, polymers, or biomolecules, enabling targeted applications. Despite their advantages, challenges such as particle aggregation, long-term stability, scalability of production and potential toxicity remain. Addressing these challenges through advances in synthesis techniques, surface modifications and comprehensive safety assessments is crucial. Magnetic nanoparticles represent a transformative class of materials with diverse applications in medicine, environmental management, and technology, driven by their unique ability to respond to external magnetic fields (25,60,62).
Core-shell nanoparticles are a class of nanostructures comprising a core material surrounded by a shell of a different composition, typically designed to combine or enhance the properties of both the core and the shell materials. The core and shell can be made from various materials, such as metals, oxides, polymers, or carbon, providing versatility in tailoring their physical, chemical and optical properties for specific applications. The core-shell structure provides several advantages, including improved stability, enhanced functionality and controlled interaction with the surrounding environment. The core is typically selected for its unique intrinsic properties, such as magnetic, optical, or catalytic characteristics, while the shell is engineered to enhance biocompatibility, prevent core oxidation, or introduce new functionalities (63). For example, metallic cores such as gold or silver are often combined with silica or polymer shells to enhance stability and enable surface functionalisation. Similarly, magnetic cores, such as iron oxide, are coated with inert shells to reduce toxicity and improve dispersibility. Core-shell nanoparticles are widely utilised across various fields. In medicine, they are employed in drug delivery systems, imaging and diagnostics. For instance, nanoparticles with a magnetic core and a biocompatible polymer shell can deliver drugs to targeted sites under the influence of an external magnetic field while minimising off-target effects (64). In environmental applications, core-shell structures are used in pollutant adsorption, water purification and photocatalysis. In energy and electronics, they play a critical role in solar cells, fuel cells, and advanced sensors by enhancing efficiency and stability. Catalysis is another key area where core-shell nanoparticles are utilised, with the shell often serving to protect the catalytic core while allowing reactant access. Core-shell nanoparticles are synthesised using various techniques, such as co-precipitation, sol-gel processes, layer-by-layer assembly and chemical vapour deposition. These methods enable precise control over the size, morphology and composition of the particles (61,65). Surface functionalisation is often employed to introduce specific ligands or coatings that enhance compatibility with biological systems or improve stability in various environments. Despite their numerous advantages, challenges, such as scalability of production, potential environmental and biological impacts, and cost-effective synthesis need to be addressed (64,66,67). Ongoing research is focused on optimising fabrication techniques, exploring sustainable materials and ensuring safe use (68). Core-shell nanoparticles represent a versatile and innovative class of materials with significant potential to advance technology and address critical challenges in healthcare, energy and environmental sustainability.
Dendrimers are highly branched, three-dimensional macromolecules with a well-defined, tree-like structure. These nanoscale materials, typically ranging from 1 to 10 nanometres in size, are synthesised in a controlled, stepwise manner to achieve uniformity in size, shape and surface functionality. The unique architecture of dendrimers consists of three main components: A central core, repetitive branching units, and peripheral functional groups. This structure endows dendrimers with a high degree of molecular precision, large surface area, and tuneable properties, making them highly versatile in a variety of applications (67). The interior of dendrimers features void spaces that can encapsulate guest molecules, while the terminal groups on their surface can be functionalised to interact with specific targets. The high density of functional groups on the surface allows for multivalency, which is particularly valuable in applications requiring targeted interactions, such as drug delivery, gene therapy and diagnostics. Dendrimers are classified by generations, with each successive generation adding more branching layers and increasing size and functionality (69). In biomedical applications, dendrimers have shown promise as drug delivery vehicles due to their ability to encapsulate drugs within their internal cavities or conjugate drugs to their surface functional groups. This dual functionality enables controlled drug release, improved solubility and targeted delivery to specific cells or tissues, reducing side-effects. They are also used in gene therapy as carriers for nucleic acids, enhancing stability and delivery efficiency. Additionally, dendrimers are employed in diagnostics as imaging agents and biosensors, benefiting from their multivalency and high surface reactivity (67,70). In environmental science, dendrimers are utilised for water purification, pollutant removal and as catalysts or photocatalysts for environmental remediation. Their functional groups can be tailored to bind specific contaminants, enabling selective and efficient removal. In materials science, dendrimers contribute to the development of advanced coatings, adhesives and nanocomposites, providing improved mechanical, thermal and optical properties. They are also employed in electronics and energy applications, such as in the fabrication of LEDs and fuel cells. Dendrimers are synthesised using two main approaches: Divergent synthesis, where branching units are added outward from the core, and convergent synthesis, where dendrons (branching segments) are built separately and then attached to the core. Both methods provide precise control over structure and functionality, although they differ in scalability and complexity (71). Despite their advantages, dendrimers face challenges such as high production costs, potential cytotoxicity, and complex synthesis processes. Advances in synthetic methodologies, the development of biocompatible dendrimers, and cost-effective production techniques are crucial for their broader adoption. Dendrimers represent a cutting-edge class of nanomaterials with immense potential to transform fields such as medicine, environmental science and materials engineering due to their unique architecture and versatile properties (36,67,43,44).
Despite the advantages of MetNPs, conventional methods of synthesis often pose significant environmental and health risks. Traditional chemical synthesis typically involves toxic reagents, hazardous solvents, and high energy inputs, leading to harmful by-products that can impact both human health and ecosystems. A number of nanoparticle synthesis methods (e.g., chemical reduction, pyrolysis and chemical vapour deposition) rely on toxic chemicals, high energy inputs and non-renewable resources. These processes can generate hazardous waste, consume large amounts of energy and can lead to the release of pollutants, including toxic solvents used in chemical reactions and by-products that are harmful to ecosystems. Energy consumption can also lead to increased carbon emissions. Some conventional synthesis methods use hazardous precursors and produce toxic by-products. Different synthesis methods of nanoparticles are illustrated in Fig. 1.
Biosynthesis is critical for preventing the generation of unwanted or harmful by-products by establishing dependable, sustainable synthesis processes that are eco-friendly. This objective requires optimal solvent systems and natural resources. Some basic aspects of green synthesis may thus be described by numerous components, such as waste minimisation, pollution reduction, and the use of better (non-toxic) solvents. The green production of MNPs has been used to accommodate a variety of biological components, including bacteria, fungi and algae (3). Green synthesis involves the use of plant extracts, microorganisms, and enzymes as reducing and stabilising agents, thereby reducing the need for harmful chemicals and minimising environmental impact. MetNPs, including those made from silver, gold, copper and zinc oxide, have special properties such as high surface-to-volume ratios, quantum effects, and tuneable optical and catalytic properties, making them highly valuable in diverse fields such as catalysis, medicine, environmental remediation and electronics. However, conventional methods of nanoparticle synthesis often incorporate the use of toxic chemicals, high energy input and environmentally harmful by-products (8,3,72). The vast surface area of nanoparticles renders them ideal for a variety of applications, including medicine (73), cosmetics (74), food chemicals, drug delivery, biosensors, bioimaging and cancer treatment (75). Nanoparticles have gained popularity among scientists globally due to their potential applications in areas of research and technology and are gaining popularity in medical research due to their small size, vast surface area, solubility and potential applications. The mechanisms of the synthesis of nanoparticles using the green method is depicted in Fig. 2. The mechanisms of green synthesis for nanoparticles along with their size, characteristics, applications and synthesis methods are presented in Table III.
Table IIISummary of the mechanisms of the green synthesis for nanoparticles along with their size, characteristics, applications and synthesis methods. |
The biosynthesis of MetNPs involves the reduction of metal ions to nanoparticles using naturally occurring biological entities. This method eliminates the need for harsh chemicals, toxic solvents and energy-intensive processes, which are often required in traditional chemical synthesis. The main principles guiding green synthesis are simplicity, sustainability and environmental safety. MetNPs derived from plant extracts are stable and readily monodispersed by adjusting pH values, temperature range, retention period and the ratio of mixing. MNPs formed using green methods are derived from diverse plant extracts, such as neem leaves (Azadirachta indica), basil leaves (Ocimum tenuiflorum), curry leaves (Murraya koenigii), guava leaves (Psidium guajava) and mango leaves (Mangifera indica) (72,76,77).
Various biological agents have been explored for the synthesis of green nanoparticles. These include the following:
The green synthesis of nanoparticles using plant extracts has emerged as an eco-friendly and sustainable approach to nanomaterial production. This method leverages the rich diversity of phytochemicals present in plants, such as flavonoids, alkaloids, terpenoids, phenols and enzymes, which act as natural reducing and stabilising agents. When plant extracts are exposed to metal ions, these biomolecules facilitate the reduction of the ions to their corresponding nanoparticles and stabilise them to prevent aggregation (3,72,77). This process is simple, cost-effective and scalable, making it an attractive alternative to conventional chemical methods that often involve toxic reagents and harsh conditions. Plant-mediated synthesis is versatile and has been successfully employed to produce a wide range of nanoparticles, including gold, silver, copper and zinc oxide, with controlled size and morphology. Extracts from plants such as Azadirachta indica (neem) (8), Moringa oleifera, Aloe vera (78) and Ocimum sanctum (holy basil) have been extensively studied for their efficacy in nanoparticle synthesis (79,80). The resulting nanoparticles often exhibit enhanced biocompatibility and bioactivity, rendering them suitable for applications in medicine, environmental remediation, and agriculture. For instance, silver nanoparticles synthesised using plant extracts have demonstrated potent antimicrobial activity, while gold nanoparticles have shown promise in drug delivery and cancer therapy (3,8). This green synthesis approach aligns with the principles of green chemistry by minimising waste, reducing energy consumption and avoiding hazardous chemicals. Despite its advantages, challenges such as achieving reproducibility, controlling particle size and shape, and scaling up the synthesis process remain (3,72,77,79,80).
The green synthesis of nanoparticles using microorganisms is an innovative and eco-friendly approach that leverages the natural capabilities of bacteria, fungi and algae to produce nanoparticles. Microorganisms are particularly effective in nanoparticle synthesis because they possess enzymes and metabolites that can reduce metal ions to their nanoparticle forms, while also stabilising and shaping the nanoparticles during the process. This biogenic method of synthesis is beneficial for producing nanoparticles without the need for toxic chemicals, thus ensuring a more sustainable and environmentally friendly production process. Bacteria such as Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Bacillus subtilis are commonly used in the biosynthesis of MetNPs, including silver, gold, and copper. These bacteria can secrete enzymes, such as nitrate reductase and cytochrome, which play crucial roles in the reduction of metal ions. Fungi, particularly species such as Aspergillus and Fusarium, are also widely utilised for their ability to synthesise nanoparticles extracellularly. The metabolites and proteins produced by fungi not only reduce metal ions, but also function as stabilising agents, controlling the size and shape of the nanoparticles (81,82). Microalgae, such as Chlorella and Spirulina, are used to produce nanoparticles such as silver and selenium due to their high metal ion absorption capabilities. The microbial synthesis of nanoparticles provides numerous advantages, including the ability to precisely control the size, shape, and surface properties of nanoparticles, which are crucial for their functionality in various applications (83). These nanoparticles are often highly biocompatible, making them suitable for biomedical applications such as drug delivery, cancer therapy and biosensing, and find applications in environmental remediation, where they can be used for water purification, pollutant degradation, and heavy metal removal. Despite its advantages, microbial synthesis of nanoparticles does face challenges, such as scalability for industrial production, the variability of microbial strains, and the need for optimisation of culture conditions. Additionally, ensuring safety and minimising the toxicity of biogenic nanoparticles is an ongoing area of research. However, the use of microorganisms in green nanoparticle synthesis represents a promising, sustainable alternative to traditional chemical methods, offering both environmental and economic benefits in nanotechnology (32,83).
The green synthesis of nanoparticles using algae and enzymes is an emerging and eco-friendly approach that combines the unique capabilities of biological systems to produce nanoparticles in a sustainable manner. Algae, both microalgae and macroalgae, are increasingly being explored for nanoparticle synthesis due to their high metal ion absorption capacity and ability to secrete biomolecules, including proteins, polysaccharides and secondary metabolites, which serve as reducing and stabilising agents. Enzymes, on the other hand, are natural catalysts that facilitate the reduction of metal ions to nanoparticles, providing precise control over the size and shape of the particles. This approach avoids the use of toxic chemicals, making it more environmentally friendly compared with conventional chemical synthesis methods. Algae such as Chlorella, Spirulina, Dunaliella and Phaeodactylum have been used for synthesising various MetNPs such as silver, gold and copper (61). These algae possess the ability to accumulate and reduce metal ions through their biochemical pathways, producing nanoparticles that are often biocompatible and environmentally safe. The synthesis process involves the exposure of algae to metal salt solutions, where enzymes and other cellular components facilitate the reduction of metal ions to their nanoparticle forms. The biogenic nanoparticles formed are stabilised by the natural biomolecules secreted by the algae, which also help control their size, shape and surface properties. Enzymes play a crucial role in the green synthesis of nanoparticles due to their high specificity and catalytic efficiency (84). Enzymes such as nitrate reductase, dehydrogenases and laccase are often used to reduce metal ions to their nanoparticle forms and are capable of selectively reducing metal ions, allowing for the controlled synthesis of nanoparticles with well-defined characteristics. In addition to their reducing ability, enzymes can stabilise the nanoparticles by coating them with functional groups that enhance their solubility and biocompatibility. The use of algae and enzymes in nanoparticle synthesis provides several advantages. This method is cost-effective, environmentally friendly and scalable, with algae being abundant and easy to culture. The nanoparticles produced are often highly biocompatible, making them ideal for applications in medicine, such as drug delivery, imaging and antimicrobial treatments. In environmental applications, algae-based nanoparticles are used for water purification, pollutant removal and the remediation of heavy metals (85). Additionally, enzyme-mediated nanoparticle synthesis is employed in catalysis and the development of advanced materials. Despite the benefits, challenges remain in optimising the synthesis process, such as improving the reproducibility of nanoparticle production, controlling particle size distribution and scaling up for industrial applications (86). Furthermore, research is ongoing to better understand the mechanisms involved in algae-mediated and enzyme-mediated synthesis to enhance efficiency and ensure the safety of the biogenic nanoparticles (87). Overall, the green synthesis of nanoparticles using algae and enzymes is a promising and sustainable method that holds great potential for applications in diverse fields, from environmental protection to biomedical engineering.
The green synthesis process typically follows three key steps:
The biological agents reduce the metal ions (e.g., Ag+, Au3+, Cu2+) to their corresponding nanoparticles. The reduction of metal ions is a central mechanism in the green synthesis of nanoparticles, where metal ions are reduced to their elemental or nanoparticulate state with the aid of biological agents, such as plant extracts, microorganisms and enzymes. In this process, metal ions, often in their higher oxidation states (e.g., Ag+, Au3+, Cu2+), are converted into their zero-oxidation state (e.g., Ag0, Au0, Cu0) through electron transfer facilitated by natural reducing agents (18). Phytochemicals in plant extracts, such as polyphenols, flavonoids and terpenoids, function as electron donors, reducing metal ions while being oxidised themselves. Similarly, microorganisms, including bacteria and fungi, produce enzymes such as nitrate reductase and laccase that catalyse the reduction of metal ions. These enzymes typically transfer electrons from biological substrates to metal ions, promoting nanoparticle formation. The reduction of metal ions can also be accelerated by light in certain cases, a process known as photoreduction, where light energy induces the production of reactive oxygen species that aid in the reduction. This reduction results in the formation of nanoparticles that are stabilised by the biomolecules present in the biological agents. These biogenic nanoparticles often exhibit enhanced biocompatibility and tuneable properties, making them ideal for applications in medicine, environmental science, and materials engineering (18,88).
Biomolecules from the biological agents stabilise the synthesised nanoparticles, preventing agglomeration and controlling size and shape. In the green synthesis of nanoparticles, stabilisation is a crucial mechanism that ensures the nanoparticles retain their size, shape, and functionality without agglomerating or degrading over time. Once metal ions are reduced to form nanoparticles, the biological agents involved in the synthesis, such as plant extracts, microorganisms, or enzymes, play an essential role in stabilising the nanoparticles (89). This stabilisation is typically achieved through the adsorption of biomolecules onto the surface of the nanoparticles. Phytochemicals such as polyphenols, flavonoids and proteins, which are naturally present in plants, provide functional groups such as hydroxyl, carboxyl and amino groups that form a protective layer around the nanoparticles. This surface coating prevents the nanoparticles from aggregating by hindering interactions between particles through electrostatic repulsion or steric hindrance (90). In microbial systems, proteins, enzymes and polysaccharides secreted by bacteria, fungi and algae can serve as capping agents that not only stabilise the nanoparticles but also impart specific properties, such as increased biocompatibility or targeted functionality. These biomolecules function by binding to the surface of the nanoparticles, reducing surface energy and preventing the particles from clumping together. Furthermore, the size and shape of the nanoparticles can be controlled by adjusting the concentration and type of stabilising agents used, which is essential for tailoring the properties of the nanoparticles for specific applications. This stabilisation mechanism also helps in maintaining the dispersion of nanoparticles in solution, preventing agglomeration and enhancing their stability under varying environmental conditions. The biocompatible nature of the stabilising agents makes these nanoparticles suitable for applications in fields such as medicine, environmental remediation and sensor technology, where prolonged stability and safe interaction with biological systems are paramount (3,72,80,91).
The synthesised nanoparticles are purified and characterised using techniques, such as scanning electron microscopy (SEM), UV-visible spectroscopy, X-ray diffraction (XRD) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). In the green synthesis of nanoparticles, purification and characterisation are essential steps that ensure the quality, size, shape and functionality of the synthesised nanoparticles. After the nanoparticles are formed through the reduction of metal ions by biological agents (such as plant extracts, microorganisms, or enzymes), they must be purified to remove any residual reactants, by-products, or unreacted metal ions. This purification is typically achieved through methods, such as centrifugation, filtration, dialysis, or gel electrophoresis, which help separate the nanoparticles from unwanted materials. These methods rely on differences in particle size, charge, or solubility to isolate the nanoparticles in their purest form, ensuring that they are free from contaminants that could affect their properties or hinder their intended applications (6,80,92,93).
Once purified, the nanoparticles are characterised to determine their physical, chemical and structural properties. Characterisation techniques provide insight into the size, shape, morphology, surface charge and composition of the nanoparticles, which are critical for assessing their suitability for specific applications. Common techniques used in the characterisation of green-synthesised nanoparticles include the following:
i) TEM and SEM. These techniques provide detailed images of the size, shape and surface morphology of the nanoparticles, enabling researchers to assess their uniformity and dispersion (6).
ii) XRD. XRD aids in the determination of the crystalline structure of the nanoparticles and can provide information about their phase composition (80).
iii) UV-Vis spectroscopy. UV-Vis spectroscopy is used to monitor the optical properties of nanoparticles, such as their absorption spectra, which are influenced by particle size and shape. It can also confirm the formation of nanoparticles by detecting the characteristic plasmon resonance peaks (92).
iv) Dynamic light scattering (DLS). DLS measures the size distribution and zeta potential of nanoparticles, providing information on their stability and surface charge (93).
v) Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR). FTIR is used to analyse the functional groups present on the surface of the nanoparticles, which helps identify the biomolecules responsible for stabilisation and capping (94).
vi) Energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX). EDX, often coupled with SEM or TEM, provides elemental analysis of the nanoparticles, confirming their composition and verifying the successful incorporation of metal ions (95).
Through purification and characterisation, researchers can ensure that the green-synthesised nanoparticles possess the desired properties, are free of contaminants, and are suitable for various applications in medicine, environmental remediation, catalysis and materials science. These steps are crucial in ensuring that the nanoparticles meet the necessary quality standards for their intended uses.
Various types of nanoparticles can be synthesised using biological sources, including plants, fungi and bacteria, which serve as reducing and stabilising agents. Silver nanoparticles may be readily synthesised using a silver metal ion solution and a reducing biological agent. Silver nanoparticles have been reported to be synthesised from a variety of medicinal plants, including Cinnamomum camphora (96), Oryza sativa and Zea mays. Silver ion reduction is one of the simplest and most cost-effective processes for producing silver nanoparticles. Kumar et al (97) synthesised silver nanoparticles by reducing an AgNO3 solution with Nelumbo nucifera plant extract. Philip (98) produced silver nanoparticles from the leaf extract of Hibiscus rosa-sinensis. In 2009, Bar et al synthesised silver nanoparticles using Jatropha curcas seed extract after heating an aqueous solution at 80˚C; the appearance of a crimson colour suggested the formation of silver nanoparticles (99).
Gold nanoparticles have a variety of uses in biomedical research, including the rapid detection and identification of heart disorders, cancer and infectious pathogens (100). Shankar et al (101) also stated that the synthesised nanoparticles were of different forms, including spherical, decahedral, triangular and icosahedral structures. The same group produced gold nanoparticles from neem extract (102). According to Song et al (103), temperature plays an essential role in the development of specific shapes and sizes of synthesised gold nanoparticles. Gold nanoparticles were also synthesised using a variety of biological sources, including Bacillus marisflavi, Coffea arabica (104), Aeromonas hydrophila (105,106) and Croton sparsiflorus leaf extract (107). Both palladium and platinum are highly valuable metals that appear silvery white. Several plant species, including Cinnamomum zeylanicum, Anogeissus latifolia, Curcuma longa, Diospyros kaki, Gardenia jasminoides, Cinnamomum camphora, Glycine max and Musa paradisiaca, have been used to prepare palladium and platinum nanoparticles (91). Ahmed et al (8) discovered that proteins were responsible for converting chloroplatinic ions into platinum nanoparticles. Ascorbic acid, terpenoids, amino acids, specific proteins and gallic acid found in basil leaf extract all played major roles in reducing platinum ions. The green synthesis method for the development of zero-valent iron nanoparticles has been a major approach for the treatment of brominated organic compounds, pesticides, azo dyes, alkaline-earth metals, malachite green, nitrate, monochlorobenzene, antibiotics, and for converting metals such as chromium, cobalt, and copper (89,108,109). Green-synthesised iron nanoparticles have been produced from several plants, including common lantana (Lantana camara), water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes), and sensitive plants (Mimosa pudica) (110). The green synthesis of selenium nanoparticles using plants is an environmentally friendly, cost-effective and non-toxic technology. Garlic (Allium sativum) bud extract, for example, has been utilised to produce selenium nanoparticles with high antioxidant activity, as validated using ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP), 2,2'-azinobis (3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid and 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl assays (111). Tea extract (Camellia sinensis) has also been used to produce selenium nanoparticles with antioxidant properties. Furthermore, horseshoe geranium (Pelargonium zonale) leaf extract has produced selenium nanoparticles with substantial antibacterial and antifungal activity against pathogens (112). These nanoparticles also assist in the removal of heavy metals from the environment. Copper nanoparticles exhibit therapeutic potential, including antimicrobial, antifungal and antiviral activities, and have been synthesised using plant-mediated methods from a variety of plants, including fire lily (Gloriosa superba L.), common grape (Vitis vinifera), oleander (Nerium oleander), Ceylon caper (Capparis zeylanica), and jackfruit champa (Artabotrys odoratissimus) (113). Copper nanoparticles synthesised from fire lily (Gloriosa superba L.) leaf extract and pomegranate (Punica granatum) bark extract have been shown to exhibit enhanced reduction and capping properties (114,115). Copper nanoparticles have also been synthesised using various plant extracts, with sizes ranging from 4 to 100 nm, including Japanese magnolia (Magnolia kobus) and angel's trumpet (Datura innoxia) (113).
Characterisation approaches are critical for understanding the characteristics, structure and behaviour of nanoparticles, and aid in determining shape, particle size, surface charge, chemical composition, crystallinity and other essential properties. The various characterisation techniques used for nanoparticles, as well as a description of each, is presented in Table IV.
Green-synthesised MetNPs derived from environmentally friendly biological agents, such as plants, bacteria, fungi, or algae have a wide range of applications due to their unique properties, biocompatibility and a low environmental impact (75). In biomedicine, silver and gold nanoparticles exhibit potent antibacterial properties, rendering them useful in wound dressings, medical device coatings and disinfectants (97). They also serve as effective drug delivery systems, enhancing treatment outcomes, while minimising adverse effects. Additionally, these nanoparticles are being investigated for cancer therapy and antioxidant applications, such as reducing oxidative stress-related disorders (75,105). In environmental remediation, nanoparticles such as iron, silver and selenium remove heavy metals and degrade contaminants from polluted water and soil. They are also utilised in air purification systems to break down hazardous substances (66). In agriculture, green-synthesised nanoparticles act as nanopesticides and fertilisers, stimulating plant growth and enhancing crop yield. Silver nanoparticles are used to extend the shelf life of food through antimicrobial packaging, whereas selenium nanoparticles are employed as nutritional supplements due to their increased bioavailability (11,78,111). These nanoparticles also provide benefits in skincare products, sunscreens, and antimicrobial fabrics. Furthermore, they play crucial roles in catalysis, biosensing and imaging for medical diagnostics and environmental monitoring, demonstrating their adaptability across multiple sectors (69).
Despite recent advancements, green-synthesised MetNPs face challenges related to scalability and consistency during the transition from laboratory-scale to industrial-scale production. The diversity of biological agents, such as plants and bacteria, can lead to variations in nanoparticle characteristics. Furthermore, the mechanisms underlying nanoparticle formation remain insufficiently understood, limiting optimisation. Concerns regarding toxicity and long-term environmental effects require further investigation (68,87).
While biosynthesised MetNPs demonstrate substantial promise for biomedical, environmental and industrial applications, several critical obstacles remain for their practical translation, with toxicity being one of the most significant challenges. Biological molecules involved in synthesis (proteins, polysaccharides, secondary metabolites, etc.) can unpredictably alter nanoparticle surface chemistry, affecting cellular uptake and potentially leading to variable genotoxicity and long-term environmental effects (116). Additionally, variations in size, shape and capping agents can result in markedly different biological responses, complicating risk assessment. Scalability represents another major bottleneck. A number of biosynthetic processes are limited by slow reaction rates, poor metal-ion conversion efficiency and strong dependence on biological sources (plant extracts, microbial cultures, etc.), making it difficult to achieve reproducible industrial-scale production. The lack of standardised purification processes can introduce impurities or residual biomolecules, contributing to inconsistencies in stability and performance. Furthermore, regulatory challenges continue to hinder commercialisation due to the absence of harmonised global guidelines for assessing safety, environmental impact, and long-term biodegradation of biosynthesised nanomaterials. Regulatory agencies also require extensive datasets to differentiate laboratory-based findings from real-world exposure scenarios, which are currently limited (105,117,118).
Looking ahead, addressing these challenges will require a multi-pronged strategy. Advances in the mechanistic understanding of biosynthesis, using omics tools, real-time spectroscopy and molecular-level modelling, may allow improved control over nanoparticle morphology and stability. The development of high-throughput, reactor-based green synthesis systems could overcome yield limitations and enable consistent large-scale production. Establishing standardised international protocols for toxicity testing, quality control and environmental risk assessment will be essential for regulatory approval (94). Finally, future research should emphasise application-specific surface functionalisation, hybrid biochemical synthesis approaches and life-cycle assessment to ensure that biosynthesised MNPs are deployed safely, sustainably and at a commercial scale.
Future advances in nanotechnology and biotechnology may further enhance scalability and precision. Standardised methodologies and comprehensive safety evaluations will be critical for widespread adoption. Future research is likely to focus on improving sustainability and expanding applications in industries such as energy, agriculture and medicine.
The purpose of this review aligns with the growing emphasis on sustainable nanotechnology, mechanistic insight and translational potential. MetNPs, particularly those synthesised through biogenic and green routes, are a rapidly evolving class of functional materials with major implications for healthcare, catalysis, sensing and environmental remediation. However, the existing literature is fragmented across individual studies, lacking an integrated approach that connects biosynthesis mechanisms with application-driven performance and safety considerations. The present review aimed to address this gap by providing a comprehensive, critically evaluated overview of recent advances, highlighting sustainable synthesis innovations, structure-property relationships, challenges in toxicity and scalability and future research directions.
The journey of nanotechnology, begun by visionaries such, as Richard Feynman and Norio Taniguchi, has resulted in the revolutionary invention of MetNPs. These small entities, having unique features arising from their nanoscale size, have several uses in health, environmental remediation, and electronics. The green synthesis of MetNPs provides a viable alternative to traditional approaches, since it employs biological agents that reduce environmental effects while promoting sustainability. Despite the potential benefits, issues such as scalability, consistency and safety persist. Addressing these difficulties is critical for moving green nanotechnology beyond laboratory research and into practical applications. Future studies are thus warranted to focus on optimising synthesis procedures, understanding the mechanisms underlying nanoparticle creation and conducting safety studies for wider deployment. As the discipline advances, incorporating nanotechnology into common applications holds immense promise for improving human health, safeguarding the environment and driving technological innovation.
The authors would like to extend their sincere gratitude to Shri Guru Ram Rai University, Dehradun, for providing guidance, the facilities and the support that were required for the completion of the present review.
Funding: No funding was received.
Not applicable.
RV designed the scope of the study, AK edited the manuscript, and RBA was involved in the literature review and writing of the manuscript. RS designed the structure of the review. NG, BSR and IR guided the direction of the review. RV and RS supervised the overall preparation of the review. All the authors have read and approved the final version of the manuscript. Data authentication is not applicable.
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
|
Kim DH, Gopal J and Sivanesan I: Nanomaterials in plant tissue culture: The disclosed and undisclosed. RSC Adv. 7:36492–36505. 2017. | |
|
Taniguchi N: On the basic concept of nanotechnology. Proceedings of the International Conference on Production Engineering, Tokyo, Japan, pp18-23, 1974. | |
|
Mukherjee A: Green synthesis of metal nanoparticles. Int J Multidiscip Res. 6:1–8. 2024. | |
|
Eric DK: Engines of creation: The coming era of nanotechnology. New York: Anchor, 1986. | |
|
Thrall JH: Nanotechnology and medicine. Radiology. 230:315–318. 2004.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Rauwel P, Küünal S, Ferdov S and Rauwel E: A review on the green synthesis of silver nanoparticles and their morphologies studied via TEM. Adv Mater Sci Eng. 2015:1–9. 2015. | |
|
Monica RC and Cremonini R: Nanoparticles and higher plants. Caryologia. 62:161–165. 2009. | |
|
Ahmed S, Saifullah Ahmad M, Swami BL and Ikram S: Green synthesis of silver nanoparticles using Azadirachta indica aqueous leaf extract. J Radiat Res Appl Sci. 9:1–7. 2016. | |
|
Kelly KL, Coronado E, Zhao LL and Schatz GC: The optical properties of metal nanoparticles: The influence of size, shape, and dielectric environment. J Phys Chem B. 107:668–677. 2003. | |
|
Zeng J, Zhang Q, Chen J and Xia Y: A comparison study of the catalytic properties of Au-based nanocages, nanoboxes, and nanoparticles. Nano Lett. 10:30–35. 2010. | |
|
Chaudhry N, Dwivedi S, Chaudhry V, Singh A, Saquib Q, Azam A and Musarrat J: Bio-inspired nanomaterials in agriculture and food: Current status, foreseen applications and challenges. Microb Pathog. 123:196–200. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Kolahalam LA, Kasi Viswanath IV, Diwakar BS, Govindh B, Reddy V and Murthy YLN: Review on nanomaterials: Synthesis and applications. Mater Today Proc. 18:2182–2190. 2019. | |
|
Meyer RA, Sunshine JC and Green JJ: Biomimetic particles as therapeutics. Trends Biotechnol. 33:514–524. 2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Singh R, Altaee A and Gautam S: Nanomaterials in the advancement of hydrogen energy storage. Heliyon. 6(e04487)2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Liu Y, Liu X, Wang X and Jiang H: AI-empowered electrochemical sensors for biomedical applications: Technological advances and future challenges. Biosensors (Basel). 15(487)2025.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Zhang B, Biswal BK, Zhang J and Balasubramanian R: Hydrothermal treatment of biomass feedstocks for sustainable production of chemicals, fuels, and materials: Progress and perspectives. Chem Rev. 123:7193–7294. 2023.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Roduner E: Size matters: Why nanomaterials are different. Chem Soc Rev. 35:583–592. 2006.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Aijaz A, Fujiwara N and Xu Q: From metal-organic framework to nitrogen-decorated nanoporous carbons: High CO2 uptake and efficient catalytic oxygen reduction. J Am Chem Soc. 136:6790–6793. 2014.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Gabiam EN, Erk N, Genc AA, Sert B, Harputlu E and Lotfy HM: Development of a highly sensitive electrochemical sensor for detecting the antipsychotic agent cariprazine in pharmaceutical capsules and biological fluids using boron nitride quantum dots. ChemistrySelect. 10(e00548)2025. | |
|
Gabiam EN, Erk N, Genc AA, Bouali W, Soylak M, Salamat Q and Ahmed HEH: Synthesize of NiSe2/Mo-MOF nanocomposite for sensitive determination of antiretroviral agent dolutegravir in pharmaceutical formulations and biological fluids. J Electroanal Chem. 986(119096)2025. | |
|
Wei C, Cho K and Srivastava D: Tensile strength of carbon nanotubes under realistic temperature and strain rate. Phys Rev B. 67(115407)2003. | |
|
Abdelgadir A, Adnan M, Patel M, Saxena J, Alam MJ, Alshahrani MM, Singh R, Sachidanandan M, Badraoui R and Siddiqui AJ: Probiotic Lactobacillus salivarius mediated synthesis of silver nanoparticles (AgNPs-LS): A sustainable approach and multifaceted biomedical application. Heliyon. 10(e37987)2024.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Singh P, Singh KR, Verma R, Singh J and Singh RP: Efficient electro-optical characteristics of bioinspired iron oxide nanoparticles synthesized by Terminalia chebula dried seed extract. Mater Lett. 307(131053)2022. | |
|
Ling D, Lee N and Hyeon T: Chemical synthesis and assembly of uniformly sized iron oxide nanoparticles for medical applications. Acc Chem Res. 48:1276–1285. 2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Gubin SP, Koksharov YA, Khomutov GB and Yurkov GY: Magnetic nanoparticles: Preparation, structure and properties. Russ Chem Rev. 74:489–520. 2005. | |
|
Tai CY, Tai CT, Chang MH and Liu HS: Synthesis of Magnesium Hydroxide and Oxide Nanoparticles Using a Spinning Disk Reactor. Ind Eng Chem Res. 46:5536–5541. 2007. | |
|
Raghupathi KR, Koodali RT and Manna AC: Size-dependent bacterial growth inhibition and mechanism of antibacterial activity of zinc oxide nanoparticles. Langmuir. 27:4020–4028. 2011.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Fujishima A, Zhang X and Tryk DA: TiO2 photocatalysis and related surface phenomena. Surf Sci Rep. 63:515–582. 2008. | |
|
Qu X, Alvarez PJJ and Li Q: Applications of nanotechnology in water and wastewater treatment. Water Res. 47:3931–3946. 2013.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Gupta AK and Gupta M: Synthesis and surface engineering of iron oxide nanoparticles for biomedical applications. Biomaterials. 26:3995–4021. 2005.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Armand M and Tarascon JM: Building better batteries. Nature. 451:652–657. 2008.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Singh P, Kim YJ, Zhang D and Yang DC: Biological synthesis of nanoparticles from plants and microorganisms. Trends Biotechnol. 34:588–599. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Kahru A and Dubourguier HC: From ecotoxicology to nanoecotoxicology. Toxicology. 269:105–119. 2010.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Geim AK and Novoselov KS: The rise of graphene. Nat Mater. 6:183–191. 2007.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Baker SN and Baker GA: Luminescent carbon nanodots: Emergent nanolights. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 49:6726–6744. 2010.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Kumari A, Yadav SK and Yadav SC: Biodegradable polymeric nanoparticles based drug delivery systems. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 75:1–18. 2010.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Vauthier C and Bouchemal K: Methods for the preparation and manufacture of polymeric nanoparticles. Pharm Res. 26:1025–1058. 2009.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Wong HL, Rauth AM, Bendayan R and Wu XY: In vivo evaluation of a new polymer-lipid hybrid nanoparticle (PLN) formulation of doxorubicin in a murine solid tumor model. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 65:300–308. 2007.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Hans ML and Lowman AM: Biodegradable nanoparticles for drug delivery and targeting. Curr Opin Solid State Mater Sci. 6:319–327. 2002. | |
|
Panyam J and Labhasetwar V: Biodegradable nanoparticles for drug and gene delivery to cells and tissue. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 55:329–347. 2003.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Dash TK and Konkimalla VB: Poly-є-caprolactone based formulations for drug delivery and tissue engineering: A review. J Control Release. 158:15–33. 2012.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Kah M, Beulke S, Tiede K and Hofmann T: Nanopesticides: State of knowledge, environmental fate, and exposure modeling. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol. 43:1823–1867. 2013. | |
|
Allen TM and Cullis PR: Liposomal drug delivery systems: From concept to clinical applications. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 65:36–48. 2013.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Mehnert W and Mäder K: Solid lipid nanoparticles: Production, characterization and applications. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 64 (Suppl):S83–S101. 2012.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Müller RH, Radtke M and Wissing SA: Solid lipid nanoparticles (SLN) and nanostructured lipid carriers (NLC) in cosmetic and dermatological preparations. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 54 (Suppl 1):S131–S155. 2002.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Hou X, Zaks T, Langer R and Dong Y: Lipid nanoparticles for mRNA delivery. Nat Rev Mater. 6:1078–1094. 2021. | |
|
Pardi N, Hogan MJ, Porter FW and Weissman D: mRNA vaccines-a new era in vaccinology. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 17:261–279. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Polack FP, Thomas SJ, Kitchin N, Absalon J, Gurtman A, Lockhart S, Perez JL, Pérez Marc G, Moreira ED, Zerbini C, et al: Safety and efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 vaccine. N Engl J Med. 383:2603–2615. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Cullis PR and Hope MJ: Lipid nanoparticle systems for enabling gene therapies. Mol Ther. 25:1467–1475. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Buschmann MD, Carrasco MJ, Alishetty S, Paige M, Alameh MG and Weissman D: Nanomaterial delivery systems for mRNA vaccines. Vaccines (Basel). 9(65)2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Resch-Genger U, Grabolle M, Cavaliere-Jaricot S, Nitschke R and Nann T: Quantum dots versus organic dyes as fluorescent labels. Nat Methods. 5:763–775. 2008.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Dhariwal J, Rao GK and Vaya D: Recent advancements towards the green synthesis of carbon quantum dots as an innovative and eco-friendly solution for metal ion sensing and monitoring. RSC Sustainability. 2:11–36. 2024. | |
|
Carter CB and Norton MG: Ceramic materials: Science and engineering. 2nd edition. Springer, New York, 2013. | |
|
Diebold U: The surface science of titanium dioxide. Surf Sci Rep. 48:53–229. 2003. | |
|
Bergna HE and Roberts WO: Colloidal silica: Fundamentals and applications. 1st edition. CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2005. | |
|
Vallet-Regí M, Balas F and Arcos D: Mesoporous materials for drug delivery. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 46:7548–7558. 2007.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Dorozhkin SV: Calcium orthophosphate-based bioceramics. Materials. 2:399–498. 2009. | |
|
Roco MC, Mirkin CA and Hersam MC: Nanotechnology research directions for societal needs in 2020. Dordrecht, Heidelberg, London, New York: Springer, pp690, 2011. | |
|
Barsoum MW: Fundamentals of ceramics. 2nd Edition. CRC press, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781498708166. | |
|
Pankhurst QA, Connolly J, Jones SK and Dobson JJ: Applications of magnetic nanoparticles in biomedicine. J Phys D Appl Phys. 36(R167)2003. | |
|
Gao J, Gu H and Xu B: Multifunctional magnetic nanoparticles: Design, synthesis, and biomedical applications. Acc Chem Res. 42:1097–1107. 2009.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Fert A: Nobel lecture: Origin, development, and future of spintronics. Rev Mod Phys. 80:1517–1530. 2008.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Huang X, Wu H, Pu S, Zhang W, Liao X and Shi B: One-step room-temperature synthesis of Au@Pd core-shell nanoparticles with tunable structure using plant tannin as reductant and stabilizer. Green Chem. 13:950–957. 2011. | |
|
Caruso F: Nanoengineering of particle surfaces. Adv Mater. 13:11–22. 2001. | |
|
Astruc D, Lu F and Aranzaes JR: Nanoparticles as recyclable catalysts: The frontier between homogeneous and heterogeneous catalysis. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 44:7852–7872. 2005.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Mondal K and Sharma A: Recent advances in the synthesis and application of photocatalytic metal-metal oxide core-shell nanoparticles for environmental remediation and their recycling process. RSC Advances. 6:83589–83612. 2016. | |
|
Zhang L, Gu FX, Chan JM, Wang AZ, Langer RS and Farokhzad OC: Nanoparticles in medicine: Therapeutic applications and developments. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 83:761–769. 2008.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Shaker K, Jabbar M, Awais H, Abbas A, Nordin AH, Ilyas RA, San Khoo P and Suryanegara L: Synthesis, properties, and environmental applications of magnetic nanocellulose composites. J Environ Chem Eng. 13(119494)2025. | |
|
Astruc D, Boisselier E and Ornelas C: Dendrimers designed for functions: From physical, photophysical, and supramolecular properties to applications in sensing, catalysis, molecular electronics, photonics, and nanomedicine. Chem Rev. 110:1857–1959. 2010.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Cheng Y, Xu Z, Ma M and Xu T: Dendrimers as drug carriers: Applications in different routes of drug administration. J Pharm Sci. 97:123–143. 2008.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Tomalia DA, Naylor AM and Goddard WA: Starburst dendrimers: Molecular-level control of size, shape, surface chemistry, topology, and flexibility from atoms to macroscopic matter. Angew Chem Int Ed. 29:138–175. 1990. | |
|
Devatha CP and Thalla AK: Green synthesis of nanomaterials. In: Synthesis of Inorganic Nanomaterials. Elsevier, pp169-184, 2018. | |
|
Azzazy HME, Mansour MMH, Samir TM and Franco R: Gold nanoparticles in the clinical laboratory: Principles of preparation and applications. Clin Chem Lab Med. 50:193–209. 2011.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Alanazi FK, Radwan AA and Alsarra IA: Biopharmaceutical applications of nanogold. Saudi Pharm J. 18:179–193. 2010.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Shi J, Kantoff PW, Wooster R and Farokhzad OC: Cancer nanomedicine: Progress, challenges and opportunities. Nat Rev Cancer. 17:20–37. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Li G, Li J and Yang Z: An electrochemical sensor based on graphene-chitosan-cyclodextrin modification for the detection of Staphylococcus aureus. Carbon Lett. 34:495–504. 2024. | |
|
Chowdhury MA, Iqbal MZ, Rana MM, Hossain N, Shahin M, Islam MA and Rahman MM: Green synthesis of novel green ceramic-based nanoparticles prepared by sol-gel technique for diverse industrial application. Results Surf Interf. 14(100178)2024. | |
|
Fardsadegh B and Jafarizadeh-Malmiri H: Aloe vera leaf extract mediated green synthesis of selenium nanoparticles and assessment of their In vitro antimicrobial activity against spoilage fungi and pathogenic bacteria strains. Green Process Synth. 8:399–407. 2019. | |
|
Rana A, Yadav K and Jagadevan S: A comprehensive review on green synthesis of nature-inspired metal nanoparticles: Mechanism, application and toxicity. J Clean Prod. 272(122880)2020. | |
|
Rahuman HBF, Dhandapani R, Narayanan S, Palanivel V, Paramasivam R, Subbarayalu R, Thangavelu S and Muthupandian S: Medicinal plants mediated the green synthesis of silver nanoparticles and their biomedical applications. IET Nanobiotechnol. 16:115–144. 2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Syed A and Ahmad A: Extracellular biosynthesis of platinum nanoparticles using the fungus Fusarium oxysporum. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 97:27–31. 2012.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Mukherjee P, Ahmad A, Mandal D, Senapati S, Sainkar SR, Khan MI, Parishcha R, Ajaykumar PV, Alam M, Kumar R and Sastry M: Fungus-mediated synthesis of silver nanoparticles and their immobilization in the mycelial matrix: A novel biological approach to nanoparticle synthesis. Nano Lett. 1:515–519. 2001. | |
|
Jones N, Ray B, Ranjit KT and Manna AC: Antibacterial activity of ZnO nanoparticle suspensions on a broad spectrum of microorganisms. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 279:71–76. 2008.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Gericke M and Pinches A: Microbial production of gold nanoparticles. Gold Bull. 39:22–28. 2006. | |
|
Durán N, Marcato PD, Alves OL, De Souza GIH and Esposito E: Mechanistic aspects of biosynthesis of silver nanoparticles by several Fusarium oxysporum strains. J Nanobiotechnology. 3(8)2005.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Kalimuthu K, Babu RS, Venkataraman D, Bilal M and Gurunathan S: Biosynthesis of silver nanocrystals by Bacillus licheniformis. Colloids and surfaces B: Biointerfaces. 65:150–153. 2008. | |
|
Seth R and Meena A: Enzymes-based nanomaterial synthesis: An eco-friendly and green synthesis approach. Clean Technol Environ Policy. 27:5775–5798. 2024. | |
|
Sallam SA, El-Subruiti GM and Eltaweil AS: Facile synthesis of Ag-γ-Fe2O3 superior nanocomposite for catalytic reduction of nitroaromatic compounds and catalytic degradation of methyl orange. Catal Lett. 148:3701–3714. 2018. | |
|
Ningthoujam R, Sahoo B, Ghosh P, Shivani A, Ganguli P and Chaudhuri S: Green production of zero-valent iron nanoparticles using pomegranate peel extracts and its use in lindane degradation. Nanotechnol Environ Eng. 8:581–589. 2023. | |
|
Rocchetti G, Lucini L, Ahmed SR and Saber FR: In vitro cytotoxic activity of six Syzygium leaf extracts as related to their phenolic profiles: An untargeted UHPLC-QTOF-MS approach. Food Res Int. 126(108715)2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Siddiqi KS and Husen A: Green synthesis, characterization and uses of palladium/platinum nanoparticles. Nanoscale Res Lett. 11(482)2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Khan MQ, Kumar P, Khan RA, Ahmad K and Kim H: Fabrication of sulfur-doped reduced graphene oxide modified glassy carbon electrode (S@rGO/GCE) based acetaminophen sensor. Inorganics. 10(218)2022. | |
|
Iravani S: Green synthesis of metal nanoparticles using plants. Green Chem. 13:2638–2650. 2011. | |
|
Rozali NL, Azizan KA, Singh R, Syed Jaafar SN, Othman A, Weckwerth W and Ramli U: Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy approach combined with discriminant analysis and prediction model for crude palm oil authentication of different geographical and temporal origins. Food Control. 146(109509)2023. | |
|
Naganthran A, Verasoundarapandian G, Khalid FE, Masarudin MJ, Zulkharnain A, Nawawi NM, Karim M, Abdullah CAC and Ahmad AS: Synthesis, characterization and biomedical application of silver nanoparticles. Materials. 15(427)2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Huang J, Lin L, Li Q, Sun D, Wang Y, Lu Y, He N, Yang K, Yang X, Wang H, et al: Continuous-flow biosynthesis of silver nanoparticles by lixivium of sundried Cinnamomum camphora leaf in tubular microreactors. Ind Eng Chem Res. 47:6081–6090. 2008. | |
|
Kumar S, Singh M, Halder D and Mitra A: Mechanistic study of antibacterial activity of biologically synthesized silver nanocolloids. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp. 449:82–86. 2014. | |
|
Philip D: Green synthesis of gold and silver nanoparticles using Hibiscus rosa sinensis. Phys E: Low-Dimens Syst Nanostruct. 42:1417–1424. 2010. | |
|
Bar H, Bhui DK, Sahoo GP, Sarkar P, Pyne S and Misra A: Green synthesis of silver nanoparticles using seed extract of Jatropha curcas. Colloids Surf A: Physicochem Eng Asp. 348 (20 Suppl):S212–S216. 2009. | |
|
Aminabad NS, Farshbaf M and Akbarzadeh A: Recent advances of gold nanoparticles in biomedical applications: State of the Art. Cell Biochem Biophys. 77:123–137. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Shankar SS, Rai A, Ankamwar B, Singh A, Ahmad A and Sastry M: Biological synthesis of triangular gold nanoprisms. Nat Mater. 3:482–488. 2004.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Shiv Shankar S, Rai A, Ahmad A and Sastry M: Rapid synthesis of Au, Ag, and bimetallic Au core-Ag shell nanoparticles using Neem (Azadirachta indica) leaf broth. J Colloid Interface Sci. 275:496–502. 2004.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Song JY, Jang HK and Kim BS: Biological synthesis of gold nanoparticles using Magnolia kobus and Diopyros kaki leaf extracts. Process Biochem. 44:1133–1138. 2009. | |
|
Keijok WJ, Pereira RHA, Alvarez LAC, Prado AR, da Silva AR, Ribeiro J, Oliveira JP and Guimaraes M: Controlled biosynthesis of gold nanoparticles with Coffea arabica using factorial design. Sci Rep. 9(16019)2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Blanco E, Shen H and Ferrari M: Principles of nanoparticle design for overcoming biological barriers to drug delivery. Nat Biotechnol. 33:941–951. 2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Fernando S, Gunasekara T and Holton J: Antimicrobial nanoparticles: Applications and mechanisms of action. Sri Lankan J Infect Dis. 8(2)2018. | |
|
Yetisgin AA, Cetinel S, Zuvin M, Kosar A and Kutlu O: Therapeutic nanoparticles and their targeted delivery applications. Molecules. 25(2193)2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Du C, Xu N, Yao Z, Bai X, Gao Y, Peng L, Gu B and Zhao J: Mechanistic insights into sulfate and phosphate-mediated hexavalent chromium removal by tea polyphenols wrapped nano-zero-valent iron. Sci Total Environ. 850(157996)2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Modwi A, Idriss H, Khezami L, Albadri A, Ismail M, Assadi AA and Nguyen-Tri P: Ba2+ removal from aquatic medium via TiY2O5@g-C3N4 nanocomposites. Diam Relat Mater. 135(109830)2023. | |
|
Kharissova OV, Dias R, Kharisov BI, Pérez BO and Pérez VMJ: The greener synthesis of nanoparticles. Trends Biotechnol. 31:P240–P248. 2013.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Vyas JV and Rana S: Antioxidant activity and green synthesis of selenium nanoparticles using Allium sativum extract. Int J Phytomed. 9(634)2017. | |
|
Hariharan S, Chauhan S, Velu K, Dharmaraj S, CM VK and Ganesan S: Biological activities of selenium nanoparticles synthesized from Camellia sinensis (L) Kuntze leaves. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 195:5823–5837. 2023.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Din MI, Arshad F, Hussain Z and Mukhtar M: Green adeptness in the synthesis and stabilization of copper nanoparticles: Catalytic, antibacterial, cytotoxicity, and antioxidant activities. Nanoscale Res Lett. 12(638)2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Naika HR, Lingaraju K, Manjunath K, Kumar D, Nagaraju G, Suresh D and Nagabhushana H: Green synthesis of CuO nanoparticles using Gloriosa superba L. extract and their antibacterial activity. J Taibah Univ Sci. 9:7–12. 2015. | |
|
Padma PN, Banu ST and Kumari SC: Studies on green synthesis of copper nanoparticles using Punica granatum. Ann Res Rev Biol. 23:1–0. 2018. | |
|
Alahdal FAM, Qashqoosh MTA, Manea YK, Mohammed RKA and Naqvi S: Green synthesis and characterization of copper nanoparticles using Phragmanthera austroarabica extract and their biological/environmental applications. Sustain Mater Technol. 35(e00540)2023. | |
|
Laurent S, Forge D, Port M, Roch A, Robic C, Vander Elst L and Muller RN: Magnetic Iron Oxide Nanoparticles: Synthesis, Stabilization, Vectorization, Physicochemical Characterizations, and Biological Applications. Chem Rev. 108:2064–2110. 2008.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Narnoliya LK, Jadaun JS and Singh SP: The phytochemical composition, biological effects and biotechnological approaches to the production of high-value essential oil from geranium. In: Essential Oil Research. Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp327-352, 2019. | |
|
Chen X, Shen S, Guo L and Mao SS: Semiconductor-based photocatalytic hydrogen generation. Chem Rev. 110:6503–6570. 2010.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Gupta VK and Nayak A: Cadmium removal and recovery from aqueous solutions by novel adsorbents prepared from orange peel and Fe2O3 nanoparticles. Chem Eng J. 180:81–90. 2012. | |
|
Yu MF, Files BS, Arepalli S and Ruoff RS: Tensile loading of ropes of single wall carbon nanotubes and their mechanical properties. Phys Rev Lett. 84:5552–5555. 2000.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Reif J, Rafiee J, Wang Z, Song H, Yu ZZ and Koratkar N: Enhanced mechanical properties of nanocomposites at low graphene content. ACS Nano. 3:3884–3890. 2009.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Zhang Y, Zhou Q, Zhu J, Yan Q, Dou SX and Sun W: Nanostructured metal chalcogenides for energy storage and electrocatalysis. Adv Funct Mater. 27(1702317)2017. | |
|
Rai M, Yadav A and Gade A: Silver nanoparticles as a new generation of antimicrobials. Biotechnol Adv. 27:76–83. 2009.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Peer D, Karp JM, Hong S, Farokhzad OC, Margalit R and Langer R: Nanocarriers as an emerging platform for cancer therapy. Nat Nanotechnol. 2:751–760. 2007.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Riehemann K, Schneider SW, Luger TA, Godin B, Ferrari M and Fuchs H: Nanomedicine-challenge and perspectives. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 48:872–897. 2009. | |
|
Chaudhary M, Kumar A, Devi A, Singh BP, Malhotra BD, Singhal K, Shukla S, Ponnada S, Sharma RK, Vega-Olivencia CA, et al: Prospects of nanostructure-based electrochemical sensors for drug detection: A review. Mater Adv. 4:432–457. 2023. | |
|
Turkevich J, Stevenson PC and Hillier J: A study of the nucleation and growth processes in the synthesis of colloidal gold. Discuss Faraday Soc. 11:55–75. 1951. | |
|
Brust M, Walker M, Bethell D, Schiffrin DJ and Whyman R: Synthesis of thiol-derivatised gold nanoparticles in a two-phase liquid-liquid system. J Chem Soc Chem Commun. 7:801–802. 1994. | |
|
Cullity BD and Stock SR: Elements of X-ray diffraction. 3rd edition. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, 2001. | |
|
Ahmad A, Mukherjee P, Senapati S, Mandal D, Khan MI, Kumar R and Sastry M: Extracellular biosynthesis of silver nanoparticles using the fungus Fusarium oxysporum. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 28:313–318. 2003. | |
|
Raveendran P, Fu J and Wallen SL: Completely ‘green’ synthesis and stabilization of metal nanoparticles. J Am Chem Soc. 125:13940–13941. 2003.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Narayanan KB and Sakthivel N: Biological synthesis of metal nanoparticles by microbes. Adv Colloid Interface Sci. 156:1–3. 2010.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Xia Y, Xiong Y, Lim B and Skrabalak SE: Shape-controlled synthesis of metal nanocrystals: Simple chemistry meets complex physics? Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 48:60–103. 2009.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Dreaden EC, Alkilany AM, Huang X, Murphy CJ and El-Sayed MA: The golden age: Gold nanoparticles for biomedicine. Chem Soc Rev. 41:2740–2779. 2012.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Haruta M: Gold as a novel catalyst in the 21st century: Preparation, working mechanism and applications. Gold Bull. 37:27–36. 2004. | |
|
Khan I, Saeed K and Khan I: Nanoparticles: Properties, applications and toxicities. Arab J Chem. 12:908–931. 2019. | |
|
Wei H and Wang E: Nanomaterials with enzyme-like characteristics (nanozymes): Next-generation artificial enzymes†. Chem Soc Rev. 42:6060–6093. 2013.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Bobo D, Robinson K, Islam J, Thurecht K and Corrie S: Nanoparticle-based medicines: A review of FDA-approved materials and clinical trials to date. Pharm Res. 33:2373–2387. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Butler KT, Davies DW, Cartwright H, Isayev O and Walsh A: Machine learning for molecular and materials science. Nature. 559:547–555. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Iravani S and Varma RS: Greener synthesis of lignin nanoparticles and their applications. Green Chem. 22:612–636. 2020. | |
|
Cheng L, Wang C, Feng L, Yang K and Liu Z: Functional nanomaterials for phototherapies of cancer. Chem Rev. 114:10869–10939. 2014.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Ilhan S and Çamli Pulat Ç: Biogenic silver nanoparticles synthesized from Piper longum fruit extract inhibit HIF-1α/VEGF mediated angiogenesis in prostate cancer cells. Cumhuriyet Sci J. 42:236–244. 2021. | |
|
Soltani L and Darbemamieh M: Biosynthesis of silver nanoparticles using hydroethanolic extract of Cucurbita pepo L. Fruit and their anti-proliferative and apoptotic activity against breast cancer cell line (MCF-7). Multidiscip Cancer Investig. 5:1–10. 2021. | |
|
Goel M, Sharma A and Sharma B: Recent advances in biogenic silver nanoparticles for their biomedical applications. Sustain Chem. 4:61–94. 2023. | |
|
Vijayaram S, Razafindralambo H, Sun YZ, Vasantharaj S, Ghafarifarsani H, Hoseinifar SH and Raeeszadeh M: Applications of green syntheized metal nanoparticles-a review. Biol Trace Elem Res. 202:360–386. 2024.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Magangana TP, Makunga NP, Fawole OA and Opara UL: Processing factors affecting the phytochemical and nutritional properties of pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) peel waste: A review. Molecules. 25(4690)2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Jia L, Zhang Q, Li Q and Song H: The biosynthesis of palladium nanoparticles by antioxidants in Gardenia jasminoides Ellis: Long lifetime nanocatalysts for p-nitrotoluene hydrogenation. Nanotechnology. 20(385601)2009.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Puri A and Patil S: Biogenic synthesis of selenium nanoparticles using diospyros montana bark extract: Characterization, antioxidant, antibacterial, and antiproliferative activity. Biosci Biotechnol Res Asia. 19:423–441. 2022. | |
|
Younus M, Hasan MM, Ali S, Saddq B, Sarwar G, Ullah MI, Maqsood A, Ahmar S, Mora-Poblete F, Hassan F, et al: Extracts of Euphorbia nivulia Buch.-Ham. showed both phytotoxic and insecticidal capacities against Lemna minor L. and Oxycarenus hyalinipennis Costa. PLoS One. 16(e0250118)2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Williams DB and Carter CB: Transmission electron microscopy: A textbook for materials science. Springer, 2009. | |
|
Goldstein JI, Newbury DE, Michael JR, Ritchie NWM, Scott JHJ and Joy DC: Scanning electron microscopy and X-ray microanalysis. 4th edition. Springer, 2018. | |
|
Malvern Instruments: Dynamic light scattering: An introduction in 30 minutes. Malvern Instruments Limited, Worcestershire, 2017. | |
|
Coates J: Interpretation of infrared spectra, a practical approach. In: Meyers RA, McKelvy ML (eds), Encyclopedia of Analytical Chemistry. John Wiley & Sons Ltd. Chichester, pp10815-10837, 2000. | |
|
Meyer E, Hug HJ and Bennewitz R: Scanning probe microscopy. Springer, 2004. | |
|
Brown ME: Introduction to thermal analysis: Techniques and applications. Springer, 2001. | |
|
Hunter RJ: Zeta potential in colloid science. Academic Press, San Diego, 1981. |