Open Access

Investigation of the molecular mechanisms underlying postoperative recurrence in prostate cancer by gene expression profiling

  • Authors:
    • Cheng Yajun
    • Tang Yuan
    • Wang Zhong
    • Xu Bin
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: November 14, 2017     https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2017.5510
  • Pages:761-768
  • Copyright : © Yajun et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License [CC BY 4.0].

Metrics: HTML 0 views | PDF 0 views     Cited By (CrossRef): 0 citations

Abstract

The present study aimed to identify potential genes associated with prostate cancer (PCa) recurrence following radical prostatectomy (RP) in order to improve the prediction of the prognosis of patients with PCa. The GSE25136 microarray dataset, including 39 recurrent and 40 non‑recurrent PCa samples, was downloaded from the Gene Expression Omnibus database. Differentially‑expressed genes (DEGs) were identified using limma packages, and the pheatmap package was used to present the DEGs screened using a hierarchical cluster analysis. Furthermore, gene ontology functional enrichment analysis was used to predict the potential functions of the DEGs. Subsequently, Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes pathway enrichment analyses were performed to analyze pathway enrichment of DEGs in the regulatory network. Lastly, a protein‑protein interaction (PPI) network of the DEGs was constructed using Cytoscape software to understand the interactions between these DEGs. A total of 708 DEGs were identified in the recurrent and non‑recurrent PCa samples. Functional annotation revealed that these DEGs were primarily involved in cell adhesion, negative regulation of growth, and the cyclic adenosine monophosphate and mitogen‑activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling pathways. Furthermore, five key genes, including cluster of differentiation 22, insulin‑like growth factor‑1, inhibin β A subunit, MAPK kinase 5 and receptor tyrosine kinase like orphan receptor 1, were identified through PPI network analysis. The results of the present study have provided novel ideas for predicting the prognosis of patients with PCa following RP.

Introduction

Prostate cancer (PCa), as one of the most common men's malignancy in America, is the second leading cause of cancer-related death in men (1). Although more than 80% of PCa was diagnosed as localized disease and commonly treated by radical prostatectomy (RP), postoperative recurrence occurred in about 15% of patients within 5 years and up to 40% within 10 years (2). Recurrence of localized PCa following treatment can lead to lethal metastatic castration-resistant PCa. Various biomarkers have been reported for PCa recurrence surveillance, including preoperative prostate specific antigen (PSA) value, Gleason score, lymph node invasion and others, but not cancer-specific and inaccurate (3). Therefore, more efforts should be devoted for identifying disease specific markers of PCa recurrence that can better directly offer practical aid to drug treatment and lead to improved survival and reductions in morbidity.

Although the mechanism underlying PCa is not yet completely understood, multiple genes to help predict PCa risk have been proposed by considerable researches. Brian R. Hu et al (4) reported that AXIN2 expression could not only predict PCa recurrence, but also promoted tumor growth and metastasis in vivo and vitro. Hao et al (5) found that XPO6 expression was elevated in PCa and maybe a potential prognostic biomarker for PCa recurrence. Additionally, some other targets from blood and (or) urine have been examined and identified, including KLK2-KLK3 SNP rs2735839, 17p12 SNP rs4054823 and Eotaxin-1 (6,7). However, few of these profiles have been adopted in the clinic after RP to predict recurrence PCa. Therefore, there is still a need for novel tumor biomarkers that can help improve prediction of prostate cancer recurrence upon clinical variables.

To explore more meaningful molecular biomarker for predicting the prostate cancer prognosis, technologies with high-throughput screen was implied to identify the genes. Microarray data GSE 25136 with 39 recurrent and 40 non-recurrent PCa was published and analyzed by Stephenson et al (8) via leave-one-out-cross-validation (LOOCV) approach and the results showed that Etoposide-induced 2.4 mRNA (EI24) and mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase kinase kinase 4 (MAP4K4) were the most highly overexpressed genes and erythrocyte membrane protein band 4.9 (EPB49) was the most highly underexpressed gene in recurrent tumors compared with primary PCa and may be the potential biomarker. Subsequently, Sun and Goodison (9) conducted a more advanced computational algorithm to analyze the Microarray data GSE25136 and acquire more accurate biomarkers for predicting the prognosis of PCa. With technological development, bioinformatics has been a mainstream tool to analyze the microarray data. In the present study, microarray data GSE25136 (8,9) was employed to identify differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between PCa and PCa recurrence samples with Limma package in R language. Furthermore, gene ontology (GO) and pathway enrichment analysis was performed to screen the DEGs. Lastly, PPI networks of DEGs was constructed by Cytosacpe mapping software and hub genes was identified by the STRING database. Therefore, it is better for us to further understand the molecular mechanisms of PCa.

Materials and methods

Microarray data

The gene expression profiles of GSE25136 were downloaded from the GEO database. GSE25136 based on Affymetrix GPL96 platform (Affymetrix Human Genome U133A Array), was submitted by Sun and Goodison (9) and updated on Jul 01, 2016. The GSE25136 dataset contained 79 PCa samples treated by radical prostatectomy (RP) in 1993 and 1999, including 39 recurrent and 40 non-recurrent PCa samples. When serum level of PSA consecutively increased at least 3 times post operation, the patients were classified as disease recurrence; non-recurrent patients with an undetectable PSA (<0.05 ng/ml) for at least 5 years after RP were identified. The clinical characteristics of all 79 patients has been completely described by Stephenson et al (8). In briefly, Median PSA level and Prostatectomy Gleason sum of patients with recurrence were higher than those in non-recurrenct PCa patients, and the number of patients with Extracapsular extension, positive surgical margins, seminal vesicle invasion were greater in recurrent PCa group compared with non-recurrent PCa group.

Identification of DEGs

The raw data files used for the analysis included cell files (Affymertix platform). The data was preprocessed by R biocondutor RMA Packages, and DEGs were identified by limma packages in recurrent PCa compared with non-recurrent PCa samples. DEGs were identified with a change fold and defined a P-value cutoff of <0.05 to be statistically significant. Hierarchical clustering analysis was applied to categorize the data into two groups that had similar expression patterns. Heatmap was performed by the pheatmap package analysis with joint between-within distances. Expression values from multiple clones or probe sets mapping to the same Unigene Cluster ID were averaged.

Gene ontology (GO) analysis of DEGs

The Database for Annotation, Visualization and Integrated Discovery (DAVID; https://david.ncifcrf.gov/) provides a comprehensive set of novel and powerful tools for assigning biological meaning to a set of genes (10). The false recovery rate (FDR) <0.05 was used as the cut-off criterion for GO functional enrichment analysis by DAVID.

Pathway enrichment analysis of DEGs in the regulatory network

KEGG (http://www.genome.jp/) is acknowledge base for systematic analysis of gene functions, linking genomic information with higher-order functional information (11). P<0.05 was used as the cut-off criterion for the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes pathway enrichment analysis using DAVID.

Integration of protein-protein interaction (PPI) network and module analysis

The search Tool for the Retrieval of Interacting Genes (STRING) database is an online tool designed to evaluate PPI information. STRING (version 10.0) covers 5,214,234 proteins from 1,133 organisms. To evaluate the interactive relationships between the DEGs, the DEGs were mapped to STRING, and only experimentally validated interactions with a combined score >0.4 were selected as significant. Then, the Cytoscape software was used to construct the PPI network. The plug-in Molecular Complex Detection (MCODE) was used to screen the modules of PPI network in Cytoscape with a degree cutoff=2, node score cutoff=0.2, k-core=2, max depth from seed=100. The criteria were set as follows: MCODE scores >4 and number of nodes >4. P<0.05 was considered to have significant differences.

Results

Identification of DEGs

After data, including 39 recurrent PCa samples and 40 non-recurrent PCa samples, was downloaded from GEO database and preprocessed, 708 DEGs, including 212 up genes and 496 down genes were identified using limma packages on the basis of the cut-off criteria (P<0.05 and fold control (FC) ≥1.4 criteria) in recurrent samples compared with non-recurrent samples. Subsequently, DEGs were performed hierarchical clustering analysis and it can accurately classify the prostate samples as recurrent PCa tissues and non-recurrent PCa tissues (Fig. 1: left, recurrent PCa; right, non-recurrent PCa). Additionally, Top up 50 DEGs and down 50 DEGs expression with most significant was shown in Fig. 1 (P<0.05).

GO functional enrichment analysis

In order to gain further insight into the function of the identified DEGs, we uploaded DEGs to the online biological classification software DAVID to identify typical GO categories. Go analysis showed that DEGs were significantly enriched in biological processes (BP), including cell adhesion, negative regulation of growth, extracellular matrix organization, negative regulation of cell migration, apoptotic signaling pathway (Table I). For cell components, DEGs were enriched in focal adhesion, extracellular exosome, cell-cell adherens junction, proteinaceous extracellular matrix (Table I). Finally, Go molecular function analysis showed that DEGs were enriched in protein binding, protein homodimerization activity, cadherin binding involved in cell-cell adhesion, insulin receptor binding (Table I).

Table I.

Gene ontology analysis of differentially expressed genes associated with PCa recurrence.

Table I.

Gene ontology analysis of differentially expressed genes associated with PCa recurrence.

CategoryTerm/gene functionGene count%P-value
GOTERM_BP_DIRECTGO:0007155~cell adhesion  386.5517241383.82E-07
GOTERM_BP_DIRECTGO:0045926~negative regulation of growth     81.3793103451.33E-06
GOTERM_BP_DIRECT GO:0030198~extracellular matrix organization  223.7931034481.72E-06
GOTERM_BP_DIRECTGO:0030336~negative regulation of cell migration  122.068965522.57E-04
GOTERM_BP_DIRECTGO:0097190~apoptotic signaling pathway  101.724137934.71E-04
GOTERM_CC_DIRECTGO:0005925~focal adhesion  427.2413798.83E-12
GOTERM_CC_DIRECT GO:0070062~extracellular exosome14925.689661.26E-11
GOTERM_CC_DIRECTGO:0005913~cell-cell adherens junction  233.9655172414.87E-04
GOTERM_CC_DIRECT GO:0005578~proteinaceous extracellular matrix  233.9655173.33E-05
GOTERM_MF_DIRECTGO:0005515~protein binding37264.137931033.67E-15
GOTERM_MF_DIRECTGO:0042803~protein homodimerization activity  467.9310344832.34E-05
GOTERM_MF_DIRECTGO:0098641~cadherin binding involved in cell-cell adhesion  203.4482758620.002756127
GOTERM_MF_DIRECTGO:0005158~insulin receptor binding     61.0344827590.0028733

[i] BP, biological process; CC, cell component; MF, molecular function.

KEGG pathway analysis

We employed KEGG pathway enrichment analysis to identify the most significantly enriched pathways of the DEGs. 10 biological pathways which significant enriched with DEGs including cAMP signaling pathway, MAPK signaling pathway, Adherensjunction, Calcium signaling pathway, Pathways in cancer, Proteoglycans in cancer, Transcriptional misregulation in cancer, Leukocyte transendothelial migration, Focal adhesion and Ras signaling pathway (Table II).

Table II.

KEGG pathway analysis of differentially expressed genes associated with PCa recurrence.

Table II.

KEGG pathway analysis of differentially expressed genes associated with PCa recurrence.

Pathway IDNameGene count%P-valueGenes
hsa04024cAMP signaling pathway230.0219291975.74E-05 PLD1,VAV3,PTGER3,PDE3B, GRIA3, PDE4D, GABBR2, CNGB1, BDNF, HTR1A,ATP2B4, NPY, GRIA2, PDE4A, RAC1, CREB3L2, RYR2, GNAS, CAMK2B, ADCY10, FSHB, GLP1R, NFATC1
hsa04010MAPK signaling pathway220.0209757540.004317491FGFR2, FGF8, FGF7, CACNA1I, TAOK3, MAPK11, MECOM, FLNC, FLNB, CDC42, MAP4K4, CASP3, BDNF, RPS6KA4, PAK2, SOS1, RAC1, CACNA1G, EGF, DUSP7, MAP2K5, NFATC1
hsa04520Adherens junction  90.008580990.012675942ACTB, CDC42, TCF7, CSNK2A1, BAIAP2, RAC1, SSX2IP, PTPN1, ACTN3
hsa04020Calcium signaling pathway160.0152550940.012798992SLC8A2, PTGER3, SPHK2, SPHK1, CACNA1I, VDAC1, GNAL, ATP2B4, ATP2A3, RYR3, PDE1A, CACNA1G, RYR2, GNAS, CAMK2B, ADRA1D
hsa05200Pathways in cancer270.0257429710.025195199FGFR2, FGF8, TCF7, PTGER3, CTBP2, FGF7, RXRB, ITGA2, IGF1, STAT1, MECOM, CDC42, CASP3, LAMB2, HDAC2, CXCR4, SOS1, RAC1, MDM2, NKX3-1, GNAS, GNB3, GNG3, RARB, EGF, WNT6, APC
hsa05205Proteoglycans in cancer160.0152550940.031484838ACTB, PPP1R12B, ITGA2, IGF1, MAPK11, FLNC, FLNB, KDR, CDC42, CASP3, HPSE, SOS1, RAC1, MDM2, CAMK2B, WNT6
hsa05202Transcriptional misregulation in cancer140.0133482070.035045912SUPT3H, FLT1, RXRB, IGF1, PAX5, GRIA3, GZMB, HDAC2, REL, LYL1, MDM2, PBX1, IGFBP3, CDK14
hsa04670Leukocyte transendothelial migration110.0104878770.035804774ACTB, CDC42, ICAM1, NOX3, VAV3, CXCR4, CLDN5, NOX1, RAC1, MAPK11, ACTN3
hsa04510Focal adhesion160.0152550940.039374107ACTB, CDC42, FLT1, VAV3, LAMB2, PAK2, SOS1, PPP1R12B, RAC1, IGF1, ITGA2, ACTN3, FLNC, EGF, FLNB, KDR
hsa04014Ras signaling pathway170.0162085370.042199384FGFR2, PLD1, FGF8, FGF7, FLT1, IGF1, BRAP, KDR, CDC42, PAK2, REL, SOS1, TEK, RAC1, GNG3, GNB3, EGF

[i] FDR<0.05.

Construction of the PPI network

Cytosacpe mapping software was employed to construct the PPI network of DEGs. A total of 663 nodes and 8,871 edges were analyzed using plug-ins MCODE. The top 5 significant modules with MCODE scores >4 and nodes >4 in whole network were screened by analysis in the STRING database, and the hub gene in each cluster, also called the seed, was identified by on the basis of the highest modules scoring in the cluster including Insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) (Fig. 2A), mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase 5 (MAP2K5) (Fig. 2B), Receptor tyrosine kinase like orphan receptor 1 (ROR1) (Fig. 2C), Inhibin beta A (INHBA) (Fig. 2D), and differentiation-22 (CD22) (Fig. 2E). All clusters are named after the hub gene name, and of these clusters, IGF-1 modules showed a highest MCODE scores in whole network, with 20.606. Additionally, IGF-1 modules consisted of 34 nodes and 340 edges; MAP2K5 modules consisted of 43 nodes and 306 edges; ROR1 modules consisted of 71 nodes and 464 edges; INHBA modules consisted of 51 nodes and 119 edges; CD22 modules consisted of 38 nodes and 74 edges.

Discussion

PCa is the fourth leading global cause of human malignancies worldwide, and is a product of mutation in genomics including cumulative genetic, epigenetic, somatic, and endocrine aberrations (12). Of the differential expression of genes caused by various mutations, some specific genes are positively or negatively associated with therapy resistance and poor outcomes in PCa. The wide application of microarray and high through put sequencing has made it possible to identify the more appropriate genes to predict the prognosis of PCa after RP from thousands of genes in human genome level (12). In the present study, we extracted the data from GSE25136 and 708 DEGs between recurrent PCa samples and non-recurrent PCa samples using bioinformatics analysis were screened out. Functional annotation showed that these DEGs were mainly involved in cell adhesion, focal adhesion, protein binding, cAMP signaling pathway and MAPK signaling pathway. In addition, to better understand the interaction of these DEGs, a PPI network was constructed and we identified four key genes, including CD22, IGF-1, INHBA, MAP2K5 and ROR1, that can provide new ideas for predict the prognosis in PCa following RP.

The GO term analysis showed that these DEGs were mainly involved cell adhesion, focal adhesion, and protein binding. In addition, cAMP and MAPK signaling pathway were shown to participate int PCa recurrence by KEGG pathway analysis. Classical signal transduction pathway and cAMP signaling pathway have been extensively studied in the context of carcinogenesis by regulating cellular growth and proliferation. cAMP-dependent protein kinase (PKA), as a critical mediator of cAMP signaling pathway, has been demonstrated that it is overexpressed in PCa and has been examined as a potential biomarker for predicting the outcome of PCa patients (13). Androgens are required for the initiation and the development of PCa via stimulating the AR signaling pathway, and androgen ablation therapies, such as chemical or surgical castration, have become a standard against PCa (14). There is a highly relevant cross-talk between cAMP and AR signaling pathway in PCa progression, because not only cAMP and PKA activation may result in the stimulation of AR but androgens can also regulate the activity of PKA (15). In addition, cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterases (PDEs) are involved in the metabolism of cAMP by regulating its degradation (16). PDE4D, as a kind of PDEs, is highly expressed in PCa and has been implicated to promote PCa progression (16). Furthermore, members of the PDE4D subfamily are classified as long, short and super-short. PDE4D7, as a long isoform member, is downregulated in androgen-independent prostate cancer cells compared with androgen sensitive prostate cancer cells, and inhibited its growth by compartmentalising cAMP (17). R Böttcher et al (18) also showed that it was up-regulated in localized PCa samples compared with the normal adjacent prostate tissues, while its expression diminished with emergence of Castration resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). Other PDE4D isoform composition, such as PDE4D5 and PDE4D9, was also upregulated in PCa and played an import role in PCa progression (19). MAPK signaling pathway also played a vital role in regulating cellular behaviors in response to extracellular stimuli. Dysregulation of p38 MAPK, as a main subgroup of MAPK signaling pathway, are associated with tumor stages and poor survival of PCa patients (20). The emergence of Castration resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) caused by certain co-activators or through MAPK signaling pathway activities, which lead to the overexpression of anti-apoptotic genes and survival of the cancer cells, thus increasing the PCa related death (21).

Finally, the PPI network with DEGs was constructed and the hub genes exhibiting the highest degree of connectivity were identified, including CD22, IGF-1, INHBA, MAP2K5 and ROR1. IGF-1 was identified as one of the most DEGs in the recurrent PCa samples. IGF-1, also known as somatomedin 1, is a mitogen that plays a key role in regulating various cell biological behavior, including cell proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis via endocrine, paracrine and autocrine mechanisms (22). IGF-1 binds to the insulin-like growth factor 1 recep-tor (IGF-1R), which is a tyrosine kinase receptor, and initiates a cascade of downstream signal transduction pathways (23). Results published recent studies evaluated the role of IGF-1 in PCa and showed that higher circulating IGF-1 levels were consistently associated with increased risk of PCa in epidemio-logic studies (24). IGF-1, which is synthesized locally in an autocrine or paracrine manner by PCa cells, may stimulate PCa growth and development (25). Then, IGF has been a pivotal target gene for PCa therapy. Magnolol has been demonstrated that it served as a novel anti-PCa agenet via regulating the expression of IGF-1 in vitro (26). Apigenin effectively suppressed PCa cells growth and metastasis in TRAMP mice by attenuating IGF-I signaling (27). In addition, IGF-1 genotypes and haplotypes were associated with wore survival of PCa patients with bone metastasis (28). Mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase 5 (MAP2K5), also known as MEK5, was overexpressed in PCa, which was associated with tumor metastases and unfavourable survival outcome of PCa patients (29).

Receptor tyrosine kinase like orphan receptor 1 (ROR1), also known as neurotrophic tyrosine kinase, receptor-related 1 (NTRKR1), is a transmembrane protein belonging to the receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) family. Down-regulation of ROR1 inhibited human colorectal cancer cell growth and promoted apoptosis (30). ROR1 has been shown to be overexpressed in several solid tumors and its unique expression by malignant cells surface is a target for novel therapeutics, especially monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) for the treatment of cancer (31). Inhibin beta A, also known as INHBA, is a subunit of both activin and inhibin, two closely related glycoproteins with opposing biological effects. INHBA is overexpressed in various cancers, including gastric cancer, rothelial carcinoma of the urinary bladder and upper tract and colorectal cancer, demonstrating its association with poor prognosis of patients (3234). Cluster of differentiation-22 (CD22), as a molecule belonging to the SIGLEC family of lectins, is a transmembrane glycoprotein expressed by mature B cells. Recently, Tuscano and colleagues reported that CD22, a hallmark marker on B lymphocytes, was expressed on lung cancer cells and might serve as a new target for therapy (35). However, Pop et al (36) reported that the surface of lung cancer cells did not detect CD22 expression, and cannot be killed by anti-CD22 immunotoxins, which have not previously been directly associated with initiation and progression of PCa, according to the present results.

Although data from GSE25136 have been analyzed by previous authors, and some DEGs have been identified, the uniqueness of the present study is that Limma package in R language, as one of the most fashionable Algorithmic Language now, was applied to analyze the data from GSE25136 and different DEGs compared with previous report was identified. Furthermore, DEGs in PCa recurrence related BP and signaling pathway was screened out, which may help us better understand the potential mechanism of PCa recurrence. Additionally, a PPI network of DEGs was constructed and 5 hub nodes with higher degrees were identified and could be used to predict the prognosis of PCa.

In conclusion, the results of this study provide a comprehensive bioinformatics analysis of DEGs to increase the understading of the mechanism underlying PCa recurrence. The study showed that CD22, IGF-1, INHBA, MAP2K5 and ROR1 may be pivotal for participating in PCa recurrences. However, these functions need to be confirmed by further molecular biological experiments.

References

1 

Hu BR, Fairey AS, Madhav A, Yang D, Li M, Groshen S, Stephens C, Kim PH, Virk N, Wang L, et al: AXIN2 expression predicts prostate cancer recurrence and regulates invasion and tumor growth. Prostate. 76:597–608. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

2 

Li HY, Jin N, Han YP and Jin XF: Pathway crosstalk analysis in prostate cancer based on protein-protein network data. Neoplasma. 64:22–31. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

3 

Stephenson AJ, Scardino PT, Eastham JA, Bianco FJ Jr, Dotan ZA, DiBlasio CJ, Reuther A, Klein EA and Kattan MW: Postoperative nomogram predicting the 10-year probability of prostate cancer recurrence after radical prostatectomy. J Clin Oncol. 23:7005–7012. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

4 

Hu BR, Fairey AS, Madhav A, Yang D, Li M, Groshen S, Stephens C, Kim PH, Virk N, Wang L, et al: AXIN2 expression predicts prostate cancer recurrence and regulates invasion and tumor growth. Prostate. 76:597–608. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

5 

Hao J, Chiang YT, Gout PW and Wang Y: Elevated XPO6 expression as a potential prognostic biomarker for prostate cancer recurrence. Front Biosci (Schol Ed). 8:44–55. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

6 

Choudhury AD, Eeles R, Freedland SJ, Isaacs WB, Pomerantz MM, Schalken JA, Tammela TL and Visakorpi T: The role of genetic markers in the management of prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 62:577–587. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

7 

Heidegger I, Höfer J, Luger M, Pichler R, Klocker H, Horninger W, Steiner E, Jochberger S and Culig Z: Is Eotaxin-1 a serum and urinary biomarker for prostate cancer detection and recurrence? Prostate. 75:1904–1909. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

8 

Stephenson AJ, Smith A, Kattan MW, Satagopan J, Reuter VE, Scardino PT and Gerald WL: Integration of gene expression profiling and clinical variables to predict prostate carcinoma recurrence after radical prostatectomy. Cancer. 104:290–298. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

9 

Sun Y and Goodison S: Optimizing molecular signatures for predicting prostate cancer recurrence. Prostate. 69:1119–1127. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

10 

Gene Ontology Consortium, . The Gene Ontology (GO) project in 2006. Nucleic Acids Res. 34(Database issue): D322–D326. 2006.PubMed/NCBI

11 

Kanehisa M and Goto S.: KEGG: Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 28:27–30. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

12 

Thoma C: Prostate cancer: The genomics of localized disease. Nat Rev Urol. 14:652017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

13 

Khor LY, Bae K, Al-Saleem T, Hammond EH, Grignon DJ, Sause WT, Pilepich MV, Okunieff PP, Sandler HM and Pollack A: Protein kinase A RI-alpha predicts for prostate cancer outcome: analysis of radiation therapy oncology group trial 86–10. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 71:1309–1315. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

14 

Govindan R: The Washington Manual of Oncology. 2nd. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; Philadelphia: 2008

15 

Merkle D and Hoffmann R: Roles of cAMP and cAMP-dependent protein kinase in the progression of prostate cancer: Cross-talk with the androgen receptor. Cell Signal. 23:507–515. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

16 

Rahrmann EP, Collier LS, Knutson TP, Doyal ME, Kuslak SL, Green LE, Malinowski RL, Roethe L, Akagi K, Waknitz M, et al: Identification of PDE4D as a proliferation promoting factor in prostate cancer using a Sleeping Beauty transposon-based somatic mutagenesis screen. Cancer Res. 69:4388–4397. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

17 

Henderson DJ, Byrne A, Dulla K, Jenster G, Hoffmann R, Baillie GS and Houslay MD: The cAMP phosphodiesterase-4D7 (PDE4D7) is downregulated in androgen-independent prostate cancer cells and mediates proliferation by compartmentalising cAMP at the plasma membrane of VCaP prostate cancer cells. Br J Cancer. 110:1278–1287. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

18 

Böttcher R, Henderson DJ, Dulla K, van Strijp D, Waanders LF, Tevz G, Lehman ML, Merkle D, van Leenders GJ, Baillie GS, et al: Human phosphodiesterase 4D7 (PDE4D7) expression is increased in TMPRSS2-ERG-positive primary prostate cancer and independently adds to a reduced risk of post-surgical disease progression. Br J Cancer. 113:1502–1511. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

19 

Böttcher R, Dulla K, van Strijp D, Dits N, Verhoef EI, Baillie GS, van Leenders GJ, Houslay MD, Jenster G and Hoffmann R: Human PDE4D isoform composition is deregulated in primary prostate cancer and indicative for disease progression and development of distant metastases. Oncotarget. 7:70669–70684. 2016.PubMed/NCBI

20 

Koul HK, Pal M and Koul S: Role of p38 MAP kinase signal transduction in solid tumors. Genes Cancer. 4:342–359. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

21 

Guan M, Fousek K and Chow WA: Nelfinavir inhibits regulated intramembrane proteolysis of sterol regulatory element binding protein-1 and activating transcription factor 6 in castration-resistant prostate cancer. FEBS J. 279:2399–2411. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

22 

Bach LA and Hale LJ: Insulin-like growth factors and kidney disease. Am J Kidney Dis. 65:327–336. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

23 

Shanmugalingam T, Bosco C, Ridley AJ and Van Hemelrijck M: Is there a role for IGF-1 in the development of second primary cancers? Cancer Med. 5:3353–3367. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

24 

Cao Y, Nimptsch K, Shui IM, Platz EA, Wu K, Pollak MN, Kenfield SA, Stampfer MJ and Giovannucci EL: Prediagnostic plasma IGFBP-1, IGF-1 and risk of prostate cancer. Int J Cancer. 136:2418–2426. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

25 

Dunn SE, Kari FW, French J, Leininger JR, Travlos G, Wilson R and Barrett JC: Dietary restriction reduces insulin-like growth factor I levels, which modulates apoptosis, cell proliferation, and tumor progression in p53-deficient mice. Cancer Res. 57:4667–4672. 1997.PubMed/NCBI

26 

McKeown BT and Hurta RA: Magnolol affects expression of IGF-1 and associated binding proteins in human prostate cancer cells in vitro. Anticancer Res. 34:6333–6338. 2014.PubMed/NCBI

27 

Shukla S, MacLennan GT, Fu P and Gupta S: Apigenin attenuates insulin-like growth factor-I signaling in an autochthonous mouse prostate cancer model. Pharm Res. 29:1506–2617. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

28 

Tsuchiya N, Narita S, Inoue T, Saito M, Numakura K, Huang M, Hatakeyama S, Satoh S, Saito S, Ohyama C, et al: Insulin-like growth factor-1 genotypes and haplotypes influence the survival of prostate cancer patients with bone metastasis at initial diagnosis. BMC Cancer. 13:1502013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

29 

Mehta PB, Jenkins BL, McCarthy L, Thilak L, Robson CN, Neal DE and Leung HY: MEK5 overexpression is associated with metastatic prostate cancer, and stimulates proliferation, MMP-9 expression and invasion. Oncogene. 22:1381–1389. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

30 

Ma W, He X, Zhang H, Liu T, Feng X and Zhou Q: Down-regulation of receptor-tyrosine-kinase-like orphan receptor 1 suppresses cell growth and enhances apoptosis in human colorectal carcinoma. Xi Bao Yu Fen Zi Mian Yi Xue Za Zhi. 32:655–665. 2016.(In Chinese). PubMed/NCBI

31 

Hojjat-Farsangi M, Moshfegh A, Daneshmanesh AH, Khan AS, Mikaelsson E, Osterborg A and Mellstedt H: The receptor tyrosine kinase ROR1-an oncofetal antigen for targeted cancer therapy. Semin Cancer Biol. 29:21–31. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

32 

Oshima T, Yoshihara K, Aoyama T, Hasegawa S, Sato T, Yamamoto N, Akito N, Shiozawa M, Yoshikawa T, Numata K, et al: Relation of INHBA gene expression to outcomes in gastric cancer after curative surgery. Anticancer Res. 34:2303–2309. 2014.PubMed/NCBI

33 

Lee HY, Li CC, Huang CN, Li WM, Yeh HC, Ke HL, Yang KF, Liang PI, Li CF and Wu WJ: INHBA overexpression indicates poor prognosis in urothelial carcinoma of urinary bladder and upper tract. J Surg Oncol. 111:414–422. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

34 

Okano M, Yamamoto H, Ohkuma H, Kano Y, Kim H, Nishikawa S, Konno M, Kawamoto K, Haraguchi N, Takemasa I, et al: Significance of INHBA expression in human colorectal cancer. Oncol Rep. 30:2903–2908. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

35 

Tuscano JM, Kato J, Pearson D, Xiong C, Newell L, Ma Y, Gandara DR and O'Donnell RT: CD22 antigen is broadly expressed on lung cancer cells and is a target for antibody-based therapy. Cancer Res. 72:5556–5565. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

36 

Pop LM, Barman S, Shao C, Poe JC, Venturi GM, Shelton JM, Pop IV, Gerber DE, Girard L, Liu XY, et al: A reevaluation of CD22 expression in human lung cancer. Cancer Res. 74:263–271. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Related Articles

Journal Cover

January 2018
Volume 15 Issue 1

Print ISSN: 1792-0981
Online ISSN:1792-1015

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
APA
Yajun, C., Yuan, T., Zhong, W., & Bin, X. (2018). Investigation of the molecular mechanisms underlying postoperative recurrence in prostate cancer by gene expression profiling. Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine, 15, 761-768. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2017.5510
MLA
Yajun, C., Yuan, T., Zhong, W., Bin, X."Investigation of the molecular mechanisms underlying postoperative recurrence in prostate cancer by gene expression profiling". Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine 15.1 (2018): 761-768.
Chicago
Yajun, C., Yuan, T., Zhong, W., Bin, X."Investigation of the molecular mechanisms underlying postoperative recurrence in prostate cancer by gene expression profiling". Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine 15, no. 1 (2018): 761-768. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2017.5510