Etanercept in the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

  • Authors:
    • Ya-Fei Liu
    • Hui Dong
    • Sheng-Hao Tu
    • Cui-Hong Zheng
    • Pei-Lin Liu
    • Yong-Hong Hu
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: September 17, 2014     https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2014.1974
  • Pages: 1585-1592
Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

Etanercept (ETN) has been widely applied in the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis (AS). As the use of ETN has increased, associated adverse effects have been reported frequently. Previous meta‑analyses have focused on comparing the differences in clinical outcomes between ETN and placebo (PBO). The present meta‑analysis evaluated randomised controlled trials (RCTs) to compare the effects of ETN and a PBO or sulfasalazine (SSZ) in patients with AS. The study population characteristics and the main results, including the Assessment in AS 20% response (ASAS 20), the Bath AS Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) and the Bath AS Functional Index (BASFI), were extracted. The pooled odds ratios (ORs) or weighted mean differences (MDs) were calculated using a fixed or random effects model. Fifteen randomised controlled trials (RCTs) involving 2,194 subjects were included. Compared with a PBO, ETN significantly improved the ASAS 20 [P<0.00001; OR, 8.25; 95% confidence interval (CI), 5.92‑11.50], BASDAI (P<0.00001; MD, -18.81; 95% CI, -24.47 to -13.15) and BASFI (P<0.00001; standard MD, -0.68; 95% CI, -0.85 to -0.50). In comparison with SSZ, ETN significantly decreased the BASDAI (P<0.00001; MD, -2.40; 95% CI, -2.89 to -1.90) and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels (P<0.0001; MD, -8.01; 95% CI, -11.73 to -4.29). The most common adverse effect of ETN was an injection site reaction. This meta‑analysis shows that ETN monotherapy is effective in improving physical function and reducing disease activity in patients with AS. Compared with SSZ, ETN markedly decreased the BASDAI and CRP levels. However, the efficacy of ETN in treating AS requires further evaluation by more RCTs in a larger population of patients prior to recommending ETN as a substitute for synthetic disease‑modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) monotherapy, or combinations of synthetic DMARDs.
View Figures
View References

Related Articles

Journal Cover

November-2014
Volume 8 Issue 5

Print ISSN: 1792-0981
Online ISSN:1792-1015

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Liu Y, Dong H, Tu S, Zheng C, Liu P and Hu Y: Etanercept in the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Exp Ther Med 8: 1585-1592, 2014
APA
Liu, Y., Dong, H., Tu, S., Zheng, C., Liu, P., & Hu, Y. (2014). Etanercept in the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine, 8, 1585-1592. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2014.1974
MLA
Liu, Y., Dong, H., Tu, S., Zheng, C., Liu, P., Hu, Y."Etanercept in the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis". Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine 8.5 (2014): 1585-1592.
Chicago
Liu, Y., Dong, H., Tu, S., Zheng, C., Liu, P., Hu, Y."Etanercept in the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis". Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine 8, no. 5 (2014): 1585-1592. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2014.1974