Vitamin D binding protein plays an important role in the progression of endometriosis

  • Authors:
    • Jin-Hee Hwang
    • Tao Wang
    • Kyu-Sup Lee
    • Jong-Kil Joo
    • Hong-Gu Lee
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: September 24, 2013     https://doi.org/10.3892/ijmm.2013.1506
  • Pages: 1394-1400
Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

Endometriosis, characterized by the growth of the endometrial gland and stroma outside the uterine cavity, is a gynecological disorder affecting 6‑10% of women of reproductive age. However, the pathogenesis of endometriosis and the molecular mechanisms involved in the progression of this disease remain to be clarified. Therefore, in this study two-dimensional gel electrophoresis (2‑DE) combined with mass spectrometry (MS) were applied to explore endometrial proteins with a role in the progression of endometriosis. Expression of global proteins in ectopic endometrial tissue (n=13; endometriosis group) was compared with that of the normal endometrial tissue (n=6; control group). Sixteen differently expressed proteins, including Vitamin D binding protein (DBP), with various functions were primarily identified in the ectopic endometrial tissue. DBP was confirmed to be significantly increased in the ectopic endometrial tissue compared with that in the normal endometrial tissue (P<0.05). Results of the present study therefore showed that DBP may play an important role in the progression of endometriosis.

Introduction

Endometriosis, characterized by the growth of the endometrial gland and stroma outside the uterine cavity, is a gynecological disorder affecting women of reproductive age worldwide (1,2). Endometriotic implants arise from retrograde menstruation of endometrial tissue through the fallopian tubes into the peritoneal cavity. Distribution of this ectopic tissue occurs most often within the pelvic peritoneum, but may also occur in the pelvic viscera, rectovaginal spectrum, pleura, abdominal wall, and rarely, the brain (3). Endometriosis affects 6–10% of women of reproductive age and its symptoms include dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, chronic pelvic pain, irregular uterine bleeding and/or infertility (4).

In endometrial tissue, the ectopic (extrauterine) endometrium (ECE) of women with endometriosis has a similar histological nature compared with its eutopic (intrauterine) endometrium (EUE), although there are a number of different biochemical and functional characteristics (57). Previous studies showed that endometrium from women with endometriosis has abnormalities in the structures, proliferation, immune components, adhesion molecules, proteolytic enzymes and inhibitors, steroid and cytokine production and responsiveness, as well as mRNA expression and protein production when compared with endometrium of women without endometriosis (811). The association between the etiology and endometriosis remains to be elucidated, however, key pathogenesis might be the characteristics of refluxed endometrium and the peritoneal microenvironment. To gain a better understanding of the factors involved in the onset of endometriosis, the molecular mechanisms of endometriosis should be investigated.

Currently, proteomic analysis is the preferred tool used for understanding this disease as it enables the estimation of a number of proteins in complicated protein mixtures and quantitative distinctions of the alterations in protein profiles (10,12,13). In addition, the combinatorial system of two-dimensional electrophoresis (2-DE) and mass spectrometry (MS) has been extensively applied to scan for differentially expressed proteins. Proteomics and mass spectrometry have been previously used to investigate endometriosis using various sample types including serum, peritoneal fluid, eutopic and ectopic endometrial tissue, and endometrial fluid (1418).

The aim of this study was to investigate the characteristic of endometriosis on a molecular level by using 2-DE combined with MS. Global proteins in ectopic endometrial tissue with endometriosis were compared with those from the normal endometrial tissue. The present study may provide insight into the pathogenesis of endometriosis as well as understanding of molecular mechanisms involved in the progression of this disease.

Materials and methods

Subjects

This study was approved by the ethics committee of the Institutional Review Board at the Pusan National University Hospital (PNUH IRB 2010144). Patients and controls were required to sign a consent form prior to participation in the study. Eutopic endometrial tissues were collected from the patients who underwent laparoscopy or laparotomy for myomectomy or benign ovarian cyst other than endometriosis, such as mature cystic teratoma, functional cyst and hemorrhagic cyst (ages 25–48; n=6). Patients presenting with abdominal/pelvic pain, dysmenorrhea and/or subfertility underwent laparoscopy and were histologically diagnosed as endometriosis. These patients (aged 27–40; n=13) comprised the endometriosis group. Samples were collected during the proliferative phase. Biopsy specimens were obtained for to histologically confirm the diagnosis and the extent of the disease was staged according to the revised American Fertility Society (rAFS) classification. The tissue samples were frozen in liquid nitrogen and preserved at −80°C until required.

Protein sample preparation

Ectopic endometrial tissue samples stored at −80°C were thawed, weighed and combined with lysis buffer containing 7 M urea, 2 M thiourea, 4% w/v 3-[(3-cholamidopropyl)dimethylammonio]-1-propanesulfonate (CHAPS), 50 mM dithiothreitol (DTT), 0.5% (v/v) pharmalyte (pH 3–10NL) and protease inhibitor (GE Healthcare, Piscataway, NJ, USA). The tissues were homogenized and then agitated every 5 min for 1 h, after which the samples were centrifuged at 17,000 rpm for 30 min at 20°C. The supernatant was quantified by the 2-D Quant kit (GE Healthcare) and stored at −80°C until required for further analysis.

2-DE and protein identification by electrospray ionization-quadrupole-time of flight/mass spectrometer ESI-Q-TOF/MS

Individual protein samples were divided into the endometriosis and control groups. The electrophoretic separation of these proteins was performed as previously described (19). Briefly, proteins were diluted into isoelectric focusing (IEF) buffer and then 100 μg of proteins were loaded onto the pH 3–10 NL Immobiline DryStrip gels (GE Healthcare; 18 cm). The gels were used to rehydrate the strips at 20°C for 12 h. IEF was performed with an IEF electrophoresis unit (GE Healthcare) after 12-h rehydration. The focusing conditions started at a linear ramp from 500 to 1000 V for 1 h and a constant voltage of 8000 V for 6 h to give a total voltage of 56,000 Vh. After focusing, each strip was equilibrated for 15 min in an equilibration buffer containing 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.8), 6 M urea, 2% SDS, 30% glycerol and 0.002% (w/v) bromophenol blue. The first equilibration buffer contained 1% DTT and the second 135 mM iodoacetamide (IAA). The Ettan DALT 2-D gel system (GE Healthcare) was used for electrophoresis along the second dimension. The equilibrated strips were inserted into 12% SDS-PAGE gels (18 cm) and the separated gels were stained using a PlusOne Silver staining kit (GE Healthcare). Spot detection, pair matching and normalization were carried out using the ProteomWeaver software 2.2 (Definiens, Munich, Germany). The ratios of the spots with ≥2-fold changes in staining intensity were selected for ESI-Q-TOF/MS analysis. Details of the ESI-Q-TOF/MS analysis have been described in a previous study (20).

Western blot analysis

A total of 11 individual samples in endometriosis group (rAFS II =1, rAFS III =4, rAFS IV =6) and 4 samples from control group were used for western blotting. Tissue protein was separated by 10% SDS-PAGE gel electrophoresis and then transferred for 30 min onto nitrocellulose membranes by using a Trans-blot® SD Semi-dry Transfer cell (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). The membranes (Whatman, Dassel, Germany) were immediately placed into a 5% non-fat milk solution and blocked for 1 h at room temperature. They were incubated overnight at 4°C with vitamin D binding protein (DBP) (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc., Santa Cruz, CA, USA) and flavin reductase (FR) (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.) antibody at a dilution of 1:125 and 1:500, respectively, in TBST. The membranes were then washed three times with 1X TBST and incubated with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated donkey anti-rabbit IgG (Thermo scientific, Rockford, IL, USA) and rabbit anti-goat IgG (Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA) at 1:10,000 and 1:1,000 dilution for 20 min at room temperature. The proteins on the membrane were visualized by an enhanced chemiluminescence system (ECL) detection kit (Surmodics, Eden Prairie, MN, USA) and bands were quantified using Image J 1.43 software (http://rsb.info.nih.gov/ij/download.html). The protein levels were normalized to those of β-actin signal on the same membrane.

Statistical analysis

Data were expressed as means ± SEM. Comparisons of two groups were analyzed by the Student’s t-test and those of multiple groups were analyzed by the Tukey HSD Kramer comparison test. JMP 7.0.1 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA) was used for statistical analyses. P<0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance.

Results

Protein identification in ECE tissue from women with endometriosis

A total of 406 spots were detected in the endometriosis group (n=13) and a total of 385 spots were identified in the control group (n=6). Among these proteins, 50 spots were found to be differentially expressed with spot density changes of approximately ≥2-fold. Twenty spots were decreased whereas 15 spots were increased in the endometriosis group compared with those in the control group. Moreover, eight spots were expressed only in the control group and seven spots were expressed only in the endometriosis group (Fig. 1). Sixteen selected spots were compared according to clinical stage (stage II=1, III=4 and IV=8) of endometriosis through 2-DE analysis (Fig. 2). Among these spots, the density of 9 spots gradually increased whereas the density of 7 spots gradually decreased from stage II to IV (Fig. 2). All 16 spots were selected and identified by ESI-Q-TOF/MS (Table I). The densities of three candidate proteins are shown in Fig. 3. The three proteins were statistically increased in the endometriosis group compared with the control group (P<0.05). The proteins were DBP (520), FR (867) and peroxiredoxin-1 (PRDX1) (400). In addition, the expression of those proteins was investigated according to the clinical stages. The results showed that DBP and FR were statically significant (P<0.05) and the two proteins were selected as validation proteins in the subsequent western blotting analysis.

Table I

Identification of differentially expressed protein spots in ectopic endometrial tissue by ESI/Q-TOF MS.

Table I

Identification of differentially expressed protein spots in ectopic endometrial tissue by ESI/Q-TOF MS.

Spot no.Accession no.Protein nameScoreMol. wt. (kDa)/pIExpressionMolecular functions
119gi|74718831Glyoxalase domain24234.8/5.40DownGlycolytic enzyme
202gi|62897681Calreticulin precursor11448.1/4.29DownApoptosis regulation
262gi|16418467Myosin regulatory619.8/7.78UpRegulation of both smooth muscle and nonmuscle cell contractile activity via its phosphorylation
305gi|62089188Lactoylglutathione lyase5520.8/5.12DownIon transport
356gi|55664663Voltage-dependent anion38231.6/7.50DownApoptosis regulation
400gi|55959887 Peroxiredoxin-145322.1/8.27DownApoptosis regulation
430gi|36038Rho GDP-dissociation27223.2/5.01DownApoptosis regulation
438gi|48145547Ferritin light chain67020.0/5.50UpCellular homeostasis
520gi|455970Vitamin D-binding protein4153.0/5.40UpCarrier vitamin D sterols
652gi|3641398NADP-dependent isocitrate7946.7/6.53DownCitric acid cycle enzyme
714gi|119630158Carbonyl reductase8930.4/8.55Down NADPH-dependent
851gi|48255905Transgelin (TAGLN)15822.6/8.87UpCalcium interactions
867gi|4502419Flavin reductase (NADPH)9222.1/7.13UpOxidoreductase
871gi|48145547Ferritin light chain (FTL)44620.0/5.50UpCellular homeostasis
907gi|5453559ATP synthase subunit d1518.5/5.21UpIon transport
Validation test by western blotting

Results of the western blot analysis revealed that the expression of DBP was significantly increased in the endometriosis group when compared with that in the control group (P<0.01) (Fig. 4A and B). This protein also showed an increased pattern in stages II and IV of the endometriosis group compared with the control group (Fig. 4C and D). Another selected candidate protein, FR, exhibited an increase in the endometriosis group compared with the control group, although the difference not significant (Fig. 4).

Discussion

In the present study, 2-DE combined with MS were used to explore proteins that may be involved in the progression of endometriosis. Two proteins identified in the ECE tissue were gradually increased according to disease progression (stage II to IV) in the 2-DE gel image analysis. Spots were identified by MS as DBP and FR. In the subsequent validation test, using western blotting, DBP showed a significantly higher expression level in the endometriosis group compared with the control group. However, no significant difference was found for FR.

DBP is ~58 kDa in size and is genetically related to serum albumin, α-fetoprotein and afamin (2123). It is a polymorphic serum glycoprotein with lots of functions that include highly specific binding of vitamin D sterols, G-actin, fatty acids and chemotactic agents. It is produced in the liver and is located predominantly in the serum (2426). It has two large domains (I and II) and a shorter domain at the COOH terminus (domain III) (26). Although it is derived from the plasma (or serum), it is expressed in various tissues and is synthesized in the cell membrane-associated lymphocytes, monocytes and neutrophils (2628). It is associated with macrophage activation, increases monocyte and neutrophil chemotaxis to C5-derived peptides and plays a role as an actin scavenger protein (29,30). However, the connection between DBP and endometriosis has not been studied in detail, with only a few papers reporting its expression in endometriosis. In previous studies, DBP presented various expression aspects in urine, peritoneal fluid and plasma (31,32). In recent studies, proteomic analysis of the serum and urine showed that the concentration of DBP is elevated in endometriosis patients compared with controls (33,34).

Our results show that the expression of DBP in ECE tissue is increased in patients with endometriosis in accordance with rAFS. Hunt et al demonstrated that DBP was synthesized by DBP gene transcription in liver, kidney and brain (in order of abundance) (35). DBP was synthesized in the liver at low levels until 40 weeks after conception and the expression presumed adult levels of 500 μg/ml in serum (36). It was also detected in the lung, heart, stomach, spleen, uterus and brain using PCR of DBP cDNA (35). Results obtained in the present study suggest that DBP transcription occurs actively in ECE and the DBP expression level accelerates with its deterioration into a deeper stage.

DBP is known as a chemotactic factor that recruits neutrophils, monocytes and fibroblasts, as it plays an important role in the immune system (28,37,38). DBP is the precursor of macrophage-activating factor (MAF). This activity was confirmed when mouse peritoneal cells were stimulated with lysophosphatidylcholine, ensuring macrophages with increased phagocytic activity (29,39). DBP is converted to its active form, and is partially deglycosylated by β-galactosidase and sialidase activities of the B- and T-cells, producing DBP-MAF (29). It is a powerful activator of macrophage functions and is involved in immune responses. The conversion of DBP to DBP-MAF may be reduced in malignancies by the action of α-N-acetylgalactosaminidase (40). Thus, activation of DBP-MAF suggests that it has a positive effect on the pathogenesis of the disease. Thus, the action of DBP-MAF may also have a similarly good impact on endometriosis in the form of cancer. However, several studies have shown differential DBP-MAF function among DBP genotypes (4144). DBP has three major allele products (GC1F, GC1S and GC2) (47). Several studies have found that the GC1F form of DBP is correlated with increased chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) risk for Asians, whereas the GC2 form is associated with reduced COPD in whites (4143,46,47). In addition to COPD, GC2 was also associated with increased risk to bronchiectasis (41). Another study revealed that DBP genotypes have different glycosylation rates. Borges et al showed that the allele products of GC1 were glycosylated at a total rate of 10–30% and those of GC2 were glycosylated at a rate of 1–5% (48). In the endometriosis study, there were related DBP genotypes. Faserl et al demonstrated that the DBP allele products in serum were different because of the reduced ability of DBP to convert to DBP-MAF, the essential macrophage activator. According to that study, the form of DBP encoded by the GC1 allele was much more readily converted to DBP-MAF, while that encoded by GC2 was not readily converted, i.e., none of the women in the control group expressed only GC2 allele products, whereas they were expressed in a much higher percentage of women with endometriosis. As stated above, overexpression of the GC2 allele in endometriosis patients may act on the scavenger function of macrophages (33). In view of our study, increased DBP expression in endometriosis patients and stages suggests that GC2 allele products may yield the survival and implantation of ectopic endometrial tissues in the peritoneal cavity or other places.

In conclusion, DBP may be crucial in the progression of endometriosis. However, additional studies are necessary to determine the association between DBP genotypes and the development and progress of endometriosis.

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by a grant of the Korea Health Technology R&D Project (A101367), Ministry of Health and Welfare and the Next-Generation BioGreen 21 Program (PJ00819105), Rural Development Administration, Republic of Korea.

References

1 

Farquhar C: Endometriosis. BMJ. 334:249–253. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar

2 

Meuleman C, Vandenabeele B, Fieuws S, Spiessens C, Timmerman D and D’Hooghe T: High prevalence of endometriosis in infertile women with normal ovulation and normospermic partners. Fertil Steril. 92:68–74. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

3 

Sasson IE and Taylor HS: Stem cells and the pathogenesis of endometriosis. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1127:106–115. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

4 

Eskenazi B and Warner ML: Epidemiology of endometriosis. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 24:235–258. 1997. View Article : Google Scholar

5 

Melega C, Balducci M, Bulletti C, Galassi A, Jasonni VM and Flamigni C: Tissue factors influencing growth and maintenance of endometriosis. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 622:256–265. 1991. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

6 

Noble LS, Simpson ER, Johns A and Bulun SE: Aromatase expression in endometriosis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 81:174–179. 1996.PubMed/NCBI

7 

Tseng JF, Ryan IP, Milam TD, Murai JT, Schriock ED, Landers DV and Taylor RN: Interleukin-6 secretion in vitro is up-regulated in ectopic and eutopic endometrial stromal cells from women with endometriosis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 81:1118–1122. 1996.PubMed/NCBI

8 

Vinatier D, Cosson M and Dufour P: Is endometriosis an endometrial disease? Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 91:113–125. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar

9 

Sharpe-Timms KL: Endometrial anomalies in women with endometriosis. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 943:131–147. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

10 

Kao LC, Germeyer A, Tulac S, Lobo S, Yang JP, Taylor RN, Osteen K, Lessey BA and Giudice LC: Expression profiling of endometrium from women with endometriosis reveals candidate genes for disease-based implantation failure and infertility. Endocrinology. 144:2870–2881. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

11 

Hunter RH, Cicinelli E and Einer-Jensen N: Peritoneal fluid as an unrecognised vector between female reproductive tissues. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 86:260–265. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

12 

Eyster KM, Boles AL, Brannian JD and Hansen KA: DNA microarray analysis of gene expression markers of endometriosis. Fertil Steril. 77:38–42. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

13 

Arimoto T, Katagiri T, Oda K, Tsunoda T, Yasugi T, Osuga Y, Yoshikawa H, Nishii O, Yano T, Taketani Y and Nakamura Y: Genome-wide cDNA microarray analysis of gene-expression profiles involved in ovarian endometriosis. Int J Oncol. 22:551–560. 2003.PubMed/NCBI

14 

Gupta S, Agarwal A, Sekhon L, Krajcir N, Cocuzza M and Falcone T: Serum and peritoneal abnormalities in endometriosis: potential use as diagnostic markers. Minerva Ginecol. 58:527–551. 2006.PubMed/NCBI

15 

Zhang H, Niu Y, Feng J, Guo H, Ye X and Cui H: Use of proteomic analysis of endometriosis to identify different protein expression in patients with endometriosis versus normal controls. Fertil Steril. 86:274–282. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

16 

Ferrero S, Gillott DJ, Remorgida V, Anserini P, Leung KY, Ragni N and Grudzinskas JG: Proteomic analysis of peritoneal fluid in women with endometriosis. J Proteome Res. 6:3402–3411. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

17 

Fowler PA, Tattum J, Bhattacharya S, Klonisch T, Hombach- Klonisch S, Gazvani R, Lea RG, Miller I, Simpson WG and Cash P: An investigation of the effects of endometriosis on the proteome of human eutopic endometrium: a heterogeneous tissue with a complex disease. Proteomics. 7:130–142. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

18 

Ametzazurra A, Matorras R, García-Velasco JA, Prieto B, Simón L, Martínez A and Nagore D: Endometrial fluid is a specific and non-invasive biological sample for protein biomarker identification in endometriosis. Hum Reprod. 24:954–965. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

19 

Wang T, Lee HG, Hwang JH, Oh JJ, Lim JN, Kang HS, Joo JK and Lee KS: Myoglobin: a promising exogenous reference marker using in proteomics analysis. Food Sci Biotechnol. 22:393–398. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar

20 

Hwang JH, Oh JJ, Wang T, Jin YC, Lee JS, Choi JR, Lee KS, Joo JK and Lee HG: Identification of biomarkers for endometriosis in eutopic endometrial cells from patients with endometriosis using a proteomics approach. Mol Med Rep. 8:183–194. 2013.PubMed/NCBI

21 

Yang F, Brune JL, Naylor SL, Cupples RL, Naberhaus KH and Bowman BH: Human group-specific component (Gc) is a member of the albumin family. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 82:7994–7998. 1985. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

22 

Cooke NE and David EV: Serum vitamin D-binding protein is a third member of the albumin and alpha fetoprotein gene family. J Clin Invest. 76:2420–2424. 1985. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

23 

Lichenstein HS, Lyons DE, Wurfel MM, Johnson DA, McGinley MD, Leidli JC, Trollinger DB, Mayer JP, Wright SD and Zukowski MM: Afamin is a new member of the albumin, alpha-fetoprotein, and vitamin D-binding protein gene family. J Biol Chem. 269:18149–18154. 1994.PubMed/NCBI

24 

Ray R: Molecular recognition in vitamin D-binding protein. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 212:305–312. 1996. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

25 

Haddad JG: Plasma vitamin D-binding protein (Gc-globulin): multiple tasks. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 53:579–582. 1995. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

26 

Swamy N, Head JF, Weitz D and Ray R: Biochemical and preliminary crystallographic characterization of the vitamin D sterol- and actin-binding by human vitamin D-binding protein. Arch Biochem Biophys. 402:14–23. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar

27 

McLeod JF and Cooke NE: The vitamin D-binding protein, alpha-fetoprotein, albumin multigene family: detection of transcripts in multiple tissues. J Biol Chem. 264:21760–21769. 1989.PubMed/NCBI

28 

Kew RR and Webster RO: Gc-globulin (vitamin D-binding protein) enhances the neutrophil chemotactic activity of C5a and C5a des Arg. J Clin Invest. 82:364–369. 1988. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

29 

Yamamoto N and Homma S: Vitamin D3 binding protein (group-specific component) is a precursor for the macrophage-activating signal factor from lysophosphatidylcholine-treated lymphocytes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 88:8539–8543. 1991. View Article : Google Scholar

30 

Chishimba L, Thickett DR, Stockley RA and Wood AM: The vitamin D axis in the lung: a key role for vitamin D-binding protein. Thorax. 65:456–462. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

31 

Borkowski J, Gmyrek GB, Madej JP, Nowacki W, Goluda M, Gabryś M, Stefaniak T and Chełmońska-Soyta A: Serum and peritoneal evaluation of vitamin D-binding protein in women with endometriosis. Postepy Hig Med Dosw (Online). 62:103–109. 2008.PubMed/NCBI

32 

Ferrero S, Gillott DJ, Anserini P, Remorgida V, Price KM, Ragni N and Grudzinskas JG: Vitamin D binding protein in endometriosis. J Soc Gynecol Investig. 12:272–277. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

33 

Faserl K, Golderer G, Kremser L, Lindner H, Sarg B, Wildt L and Seeber B: Polymorphism in vitamin D-binding protein as a genetic risk factor in the pathogenesis of endometriosis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 96:E233–E241. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

34 

Cho S, Choi YS, Yim SY, Yang HI, Jeon YE, Lee KE, Kim H, Seo SK and Lee BS: Urinary vitamin D-binding protein is elevated in patients with endometriosis. Hum Reprod. 27:515–522. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

35 

Hunt JL and Licht P: Identification and structural characterization of a novel member of the vitamin D binding protein family. Comp Biochem Physiol B Biochem Mol Biol. 121:397–406. 1998. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

36 

Haddad JG, Harper KD, Guoth M, Pietra GG and Sanger JW: Angiopathic consequences of saturating the plasma scavenger system for actin. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 87:1381–1385. 1990. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

37 

Perez HD, Kelly E, Chenoweth D and Elfman F: Identification of the C5a des Arg cochemotaxin. Homology with vitamin D-binding protein (group-specific component globulin). J Clin Invest. 82:360–363. 1988. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

38 

Piquette CA, Robinson-Hill R and Webster RO: Human monocyte chemotaxis to complement-derived chemotaxins is enhanced by Gc-globulin. J Leukoc Biol. 55:349–354. 1994.PubMed/NCBI

39 

Yamamoto N, Homma S and Millman I: Identification of the serum factor required for in vitro activation of macrophages. Role of vitamin D3-binding protein (group specific component, Gc) in lysophospholipid activation of mouse peritoneal macrophages. J Immunol. 147:273–280. 1991.

40 

Yamamoto N, Naraparaju VR and Asbell SO: Deglycosylation of serum vitamin D3-binding protein leads to immunosuppression in cancer patients. Cancer Res. 56:2827–2831. 1996.PubMed/NCBI

41 

Wood AM, Bassford C, Webster D, Newby P, Rajesh P, Stockley RA and Thickett DR: Vitamin D-binding protein contributes to COPD by activation of alveolar macrophages. Thorax. 66:205–210. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

42 

Ishii T, Keicho N, Teramoto S, Azuma A, Kudoh S, Fukuchi Y, Ouchi Y and Matsuse T: Association of Gc-globulin variation with susceptibility to COPD and diffuse panbronchiolitis. Eur Respir J. 18:753–757. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

43 

Ito I, Nagai S, Hoshino Y, Muro S, Hirai T, Tsukino M and Mishima M: Risk and severity of COPD is associated with the group-specific component of serum globulin 1F allele. Chest. 125:63–70. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

44 

Dimeloe S and Hawrylowicz C: A direct role for vitamin D-binding protein in the pathogenesis of COPD? Thorax. 66:189–190. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

45 

Chun RF: New perspectives on the vitamin D binding protein. Cell Biochem Funct. 30:445–456. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

46 

Horne SL, Cockcroft DW and Dosman JA: Possible protective effect against chronic obstructive airways disease by the GC2 allele. Hum Hered. 40:173–176. 1990. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

47 

Schellenberg D, Paré PD, Weir TD, Spinelli JJ, Walker BA and Sandford AJ: Vitamin D binding protein variants and the risk of COPD. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 157:957–961. 1998. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

48 

Borges CR, Jarvis JW, Oran PE and Nelson RW: Population studies of vitamin D binding protein microheterogeneity by mass spectrometry lead to characterization of its genotype- dependent O-glycosylation patterns. J Proteome Res. 7:4143–4153. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar

Related Articles

Journal Cover

December 2013
Volume 32 Issue 6

Print ISSN: 1107-3756
Online ISSN:1791-244X

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Hwang J, Wang T, Lee K, Joo J and Lee H: Vitamin D binding protein plays an important role in the progression of endometriosis. Int J Mol Med 32: 1394-1400, 2013
APA
Hwang, J., Wang, T., Lee, K., Joo, J., & Lee, H. (2013). Vitamin D binding protein plays an important role in the progression of endometriosis. International Journal of Molecular Medicine, 32, 1394-1400. https://doi.org/10.3892/ijmm.2013.1506
MLA
Hwang, J., Wang, T., Lee, K., Joo, J., Lee, H."Vitamin D binding protein plays an important role in the progression of endometriosis". International Journal of Molecular Medicine 32.6 (2013): 1394-1400.
Chicago
Hwang, J., Wang, T., Lee, K., Joo, J., Lee, H."Vitamin D binding protein plays an important role in the progression of endometriosis". International Journal of Molecular Medicine 32, no. 6 (2013): 1394-1400. https://doi.org/10.3892/ijmm.2013.1506