Open Access

Effect of CEACAM‑1 knockdown in human colorectal cancer cells

  • Authors:
    • Zhong‑Min Han
    • He‑Mei Huang
    • Yong‑Wu Sun
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: May 30, 2018     https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2018.8835
  • Pages: 1622-1626
  • Copyright: © Han et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License.

Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

Carcinoembryonic antigen‑related cell adhesion molecule 1 (CEACAM‑1) is the major antigen of the CD66 cluster of granulocyte differentiation antigens. The present study aimed to assess the biological function of CEACAM‑1 on the growth of human colorectal cancer (CRC) cells in vitro. Treatment of cultured CRC HCT‑8 cells with CEACAM‑1‑specific siRNA successfully downregulated CEACAM‑1 expression by 61% compared with control cells. The effects of CEACAM‑1 downregulation on HCT‑8 cell proliferation and apoptosis were then assessed via Cell Counting kit‑8 assay and flow cytometry, respectively. The results demonstrated that siRNA‑induced CEACAM‑1 downregulation significantly inhibited proliferation and increased apoptosis, but had no significant effect on cell cycle progression in HCT‑8 cells. Together, these results suggest that CEACAM‑1 activity is critical to CRC growth, and thus, CEACAM‑1 may be a promising therapeutic target for the treatment of CRC.

Introduction

Malignant tumor growth is a common and serious disease condition that may affect any number of different organs and tissues throughout the body, and incur varied and complex symptoms that are often life threatening. Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common gastrointestinal malignancies, and localizes to the rectum or the junction of the rectum and the sigmoid colon. In fact, CRC is the fourth most common type of cancer internationally, following gastric, esophageal, and lung cancer (1,2).

Malignant tumors are often characterized by both tissue architecture disruption, and differentiation derangement. Cell adhesion dysregulation contributes to tumor invasion and metastasis (3), such that the abnormal expression of various cell adhesion molecules induces a loss of cell-cell binding, thereby promoting tumor differentiation and malignant invasion (4). Carcinoembryonic antigen-related cell adhesion molecules (CEACAMs) are members of the glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI)-linked immunoglobulin (Ig) superfamily (5). CEACAM-1 is a CEACAM subtype that is also known as biliary glycoprotein I or CD66a (6,7). Previous studies have demonstrated that CEACAM-1 expression is reduced in several tumor types, such as melanoma, lung, colon and ovarian cancer, compared with the corresponding normal tissues (814). This suggests that CEACAM-1 may function to inhibit carcinogenesis. In addition, CEACAM-1 has been reported to promote the apoptosis of various cells, including pulmonary and mammary epithelial cells, oral keratinocytes, cancer cells, Jurkat T cells, and cardiomyocytes (13,15,16).

To date, the expression of CEACAM-1 in CRC has not been investigated. In the present study, CEACAM-1 expression was silenced in a CRC cell line, and its effects on cell growth and apoptosis were examined. The findings provide the first evidence that decreased CEACAM-1 expression promotes CRC progression.

Materials and methods

Cell culture

HCT-8 cells (Type Culture Collection of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China) were maintained (37°C, 5% CO2) in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum (all from Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA), 100 µg/ml penicillin, and 100 µg/ml streptomycin. The cells were passaged every 2–3 days, using 0.02% EDTA and 0.1% trypsin.

Small-interfering RNA (siRNA) design and cell transfection

Vectors carrying either siRNA specific to CEACAM-1 or a negative control siRNA were generated by GeneChem Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). Three CEACAM-1-specific siRNAs were designed, as follows: siRNA1 sense, 5′-CAGCCACAGAAAUAAUUUATT-3′ and antisense, 5′-UAAAUUAUUUCUGUGGCUGTT-3′; siRNA2 sense, 5′-CCGUCAAAUUGUAGGAUAUTT-3′ and antisense, 5′-AUAUCCUACAAUUUGACGGTT-3′; and siRNA3 sense, 5′-GAGCUCUUUAUCCCUAACATT-3′ and antisense, 5′-UGUUAGGGAUAAAGAGCUCTT-3′. A siRNA encoding a nonsense sequence (sense, 5′-UUCUCCGAACGUGUCACGUTT-3′ and antisense, 5′-ACGUGACACGUUCGGAGAATT-3′), was designed and used as a negative control (GenePharma Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China). HCT-8 cells were cultured until they reached 50% confluence, washed with PBS, and transfected with 50 nM CEACAM-1-specific or control siRNA, according to the manufacturer's instructions. Cells were collected 48 h post-transfection, and maintained in fresh medium for 24 h prior to further experimentation and/or analysis.

Reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR)

CEACAM-1 expression was analyzed via RT-qPCR, as previously described (17). Briefly, total RNA was extracted from CRC cells, using an RNeasy Mini kit (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). Genomic DNA was removed from the extracted total RNA via DNase I digestion, and then the total RNA was reverse transcribed to generate cDNA, according to the manufacturer's instructions (PrimeScript 1st strand cDNA Synthesis kit; Takara Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Dalian, China). qPCR was performed in triplicate in a 10 µl reaction mix consisting of 4 µl template DNA (0.05 µg/µl), 5 µl SYBR-Green (Takara Biotechnology Co., Ltd.), 0.2 µl each forward and reverse oligonucleotide (10 µM each) and 0.6 µl deionized water. The thermocycling conditions were as follows: 95°C for 10 min, followed by 40 cycles of 95°C for 10 sec, 60°C for 30 sec, and 72°C for 30 sec. The primers used for qPCR were: CEACAM-1 forward, 5′-CAGGGGCTTCTGCTCACAGC-3′ and reverse, 5′-AGTTGCTTCTTCACAAGAT-3′; β-actin forward, 5′-GGCTGTGGAGACAAAAATGACCTC-3′ and reverse, 5′-AGGCTTGGGCTTGAATGGAGTC-3′. The expression level was estimated with the 2−ΔΔCq method (18).

Western blot analysis

CEACAM-1 expression levels were determined via western blot analysis. CRC cells were washed twice with PBS, and collected via centrifugation. Proteins were then extracted with cell lysis buffer (CST Biological Reagents Company, Ltd., Shanghai, China) containing 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, and the protein concentration of each sample was determined using the BCA protein assay reagent kit (Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology, Lianyungang, China), and bovine serum albumin was used as a standard. The samples were denatured, and 50–80 µg were separated via polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and transferred onto nitrocellulose membranes. The membranes were incubated first (4°C, overnight) with anti-CEACAM-1 (cat. no. AF1857; Novus Biologicals, Ltd., Cambridge, UK; dilution, 1:200) and anti-β-actin (cat. no. ab8227; Abcam, Cambridge, UK; dilution, 1:4,000) antibodies. The membranes were then incubated with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated rabbit anti-human secondary antibodies (cat. no. ab6759; Abcam; dilution, 1:3,000) for 12 h at 4°C, and finally with enhanced chemiluminescence substrate (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Hercules, CA, USA). The resulting blots were analyzed using ImageJ software (NIH, Bethesda, MA, USA).

Cell proliferation

Cell proliferation was assessed by a CCK-8 assay (Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Mannheim, Germany), according to the manufacturer's instructions. Typically, cells were plated at a density of 1.5–2×103 cells/well in 96-well plates. After 48 h (to allow cell adherence to occur), cells were incubated with colorimetric substrates. Colorimetric changes were then measured in a multi-well spectrophotometer (MR5000 Multiplate Reader; Dynatech, Denkendorf, Germany), and cell survival following treatment was expressed as a % of viable cells relative to control cell values. All experiments were independently conducted three times, and the results of the three experiments were then averaged.

Cell cycle assay

Cells were fixed, washed with PBS, treated with RNaseA, and stained (37°C, 30 min) with 25 µg/ml propidium iodide (PI). The samples were then analyzed via flow cytometry, and the cell cycle phase distribution was quantified using Modfit Software (BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA). The proliferative index was calculated to represent the % of cells identified to occur in the S/G2/M phase.

Apoptosis assay

Cells were collected, stained with Annexin V-fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) and 7-Aminoactinomycin D using an Annexin V-FITC Apoptosis Detection kit (KeyGen Biotech Co., Ltd., Nanjing, China) according to the manufacturer's instructions, and analyzed via flow cytometry (BD Biosciences).

Statistical analysis

All results are presented as the mean ± standard error of the mean. Differences between two groups were evaluated by the unpaired Student's t-test. One-way analysis of variance with post-hoc analysis by Bonferroni's test was performed to evaluate the data generated by the cellular viability and apoptosis assays. Additional statistical analyses were performed by Student's t-tests. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.

Results

Knockdown of CEACAM-1 in HCT-8 cells

To investigate the function of CEACAM-1 expression in CRC cells, three separate siRNA sequences, comprising CEACAM-1-siRNA1, CEACAM-1-siRNA2, and CEACAM-1-siRNA3, were designed. When testing their efficacy, the three sequences induced a 61.3, 32.4 and 47.3% decrease in CEACAM-1 mRNA expression, respectively, in the CEACAM-1-knockdown cells compared with the negative control HCT-8 cells (Fig. 1A). The results from western blot analysis revealed a concordant reduction in CEACAM-1 protein expression levels compared with the control group (Fig. 1B). The CEACAM-1-siRNA1 sequence was selected for use in subsequent experiments, since it induced the greatest reduction in CEACAM-1 expression.

CEACAM-1 downregulation inhibits cell proliferation

CEACAM-1 knockdown significantly decreased the numbers of viable HCT-8 cells compared with the control group (Fig. 2), suggesting that CEACAM-1 silencing inhibited CRC cell proliferation.

CEACAM-1 downregulation increases cell apoptosis

Next, the effect of CEACAM-1 silencing on apoptosis was determined in CRC cells. The results from Annexin V cytometric analysis revealed that CEACAM-1 downregulation resulted in a significant increase in the apoptotic rate of HCT-8 cells (1.23% in the CEACAM-1-knockdown group compared with 0.197% in the control group; P<0.01; Fig. 3). The experiment was performed in triplicate.

CEACAM-1 might function to inhibit carcinogenesis, which is often associated with both cell cycle arrest and activation of the cell death pathway. Therefore, the cell cycle phase distribution was examined in the CEACAM-1-knockdown cells to determine whether CEACAM-1 knockdown has an effect in cell cycle arrest. The results revealed no significant difference in the % of G2/M-phase cells that occurred in the CEACAM-1-knockdown compared with the control group (P>0.05; Fig. 4). The experiment was performed in triplicate.

Discussion

To date, the function of CEACAM-1 expression in malignant tumors remains unclear. Previous studies have investigated CEACAM expression via either immunohistochemical or serum expression analyses (19,20). To elucidate its functional role in CRC, the present study assessed the effect of silencing CEACAM-1 expression on the viability and proliferation of a CRC cell line CEACAM-1 belongs to a diverse family of GPI-linked Igs that combine the structural features of the Ig superfamily with the functional properties of cadherins (21).

In the present study, CEACAM-1 expression was inhibited in the HCT-8 cell line via three custom-designed siRNA sequences, achieving a maximal reduction in CEACAM-1 mRNA expression by 61.3% compared with the control cells, and a similar reduction in CEACAM-1 protein production. Subsequently, it was determined that CEACAM-1 downregulation significantly inhibited cell proliferation and promoted cell apoptosis, suggesting that CEACAM-1 may have a potential clinical use in the treatment of CRC. Consistent with these results, a previous study has demonstrated that CEACAM-1 knockdown results in the decreased proliferation and migration of human pancreatic adenocarcinoma Pac 5061 cells (17). Thus, it can be concluded that CEACAM-1 is likely an important modulator of CRC.

Collectively, the results of the present study demonstrated that CEACAM-1 downregulation in CRC cells significantly inhibited cell proliferation and promoted apoptosis. Thus, CEACAM-1 may be a critical mediator of CRC cell growth and progression, and as a result, a promising potential target for novel CRC treatment strategies.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

The present study was supported by the Key Project of Universities and Colleges in Henan, China (grant no. 15A310033).

Availability of data and materials

The analyzed datasets generated during the study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Authors' contributions

Z-MH designed, analyzed the experiments and wrote the manuscript. H-MH and Y-WS performed the experiments and co-wrote the manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

1 

Chen W, Zheng R, Zeng H and Zhang S: The incidence and mortality of major cancers in China, 2012. Chin J Cancer. 35:732016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

2 

Rosso T, Malvezzi M, Bosetti C, Bertuccio P, Negri E and La Vecchia C: Cancer mortality in Europe, 1970–2009: An age, period, and cohort analysis. Eur J Cancer Prev. 27:88–102. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar

3 

Cavallaro U and Christofori G: Cell adhesion in tumor invasion and metastasis: Loss of the glue is not enough. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1552:39–45. 2001.PubMed/NCBI

4 

Pignatelli M and Vessey CJ: Adhesion molecules: Novel molecular tools in tumor pathology. Hum Pathol. 25:849–856. 1994. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

5 

Oettle H, Post S, Neuhaus P, Gellert K, Langrehr J, Ridwelski K, Schramm H, Fahlke J, Zuelke C, Burkart C, et al: Adjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine vs observation in patients undergoing curative-intent resection of pancreatic cancer: A randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 297:267–277. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

6 

Rojas M, Fuks A and Stanners CP: Biliary glycoprotein, a member of the immunoglobulin supergene family, functions in vitro as a Ca2(+)-dependent intercellular adhesion molecule. Cell Growth Differ. 1:527–533. 1990.PubMed/NCBI

7 

Beauchemin N, Draber P, Dveksler G, Gold P, Gray-Owen S, Grunert F, Hammarström S, Holmes KV, Karlsson A, Kuroki M, et al: Redefined nomenclature for members of the carcinoembryonic antigen family. Exp Cell Res. 252:243–249. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

8 

Arabzadeh A, Chan C, Nouvion AL, Breton V, Benlolo S, DeMarte L, Turbide C, Brodt P, Ferri L and Beauchemin N: Host-related carcinoembryonic antigen cell adhesion molecule 1 promotes metastasis of colorectal cancer. Oncogene. 32:849–860. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

9 

Thöm I, Schult-Kronefeld O, Burkholder I, Schuch G, Andritzky B, Kastendieck H, Edler L, Wagener C, Bokemeyer C, Schumacher U and Laack E: Expression of CEACAM-1 in pulmonary adenocarcinomas and their metastases. Anticancer Res. 29:249–254. 2009.PubMed/NCBI

10 

Thies A, Moll I, Berger J, Wagener C, Brümmer J, Schulze HJ, Brunner G and Schumacher U: CEACAM1 expression in cutaneous malignant melanoma predicts the development of metastatic disease. J Clin Oncol. 20:2530–2536. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

11 

Dango S, Sienel W, Schreiber M, Stremmel C, Kirschbaum A, Pantel K and Passlick B: Elevated expression of carcinoembryonic antigen-related cell adhesion molecule 1 (CEACAM-1) is associated with increased angiogenic potential in non-small-cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer. 60:426–433. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

12 

Yoshikawa M, Morine Y, Ikemoto T, Imura S, Higashijima J, Iwahashi S, Saito YU, Takasu C, Yamada S, Ishikawa D, et al: Elevated preoperative serum CEA level is associated with poor prognosis in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma through the epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Anticancer Res. 37:1169–1175. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

13 

Li N, Yang JY, Wang XY, Wang HT, Guan BX and Zhou CJ: Carcinoembryonic antigen-related cell adhesion molecule 1 is expressed and as a function histotype in ovarian tumors. Ann Diagn Pathol. 20:7–12. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

14 

Gebauer F, Wicklein D, Horst J, Sundermann P, Maar H, Streichert T, Tachezy M, Izbicki JR, Bockhorn M and Schumacher U: Carcinoembryonic antigen-related cell adhesion molecules (CEACAM) 1, 5 and 6 as biomarkers in pancreatic cancer. PLoS One. 9:e1130232014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

15 

Li Y and Shively JE: CEACAM1 regulates Fas-mediated apoptosis in Jurkat T-cells via its interaction with β-catenin. Exp Cell Res. 319:1061–1072. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

16 

Liu GX, Xie Q, Zhou CJ, Zhang XY, Ma BL, Wang CQ, Wei FC, Qu X and Sun SZ: The possible roles of OPN-regulated CEACAM1 expression in promoting the survival of activated T cells and the apoptosis of oral keratinocytes in oral lichen planus patients. J Clin Immunol. 31:827–839. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

17 

Beauchemin N and Arabzadeh A: Carcinoembryonic antigen-related cell adhesion molecules (CEACAMs) in cancer progression and metastasis. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 32:643–671. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

18 

Livak KJ and Schmittgen TD: Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) method. Methods. 25:402–408. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

19 

Simeone DM, Ji B, Banerjee M, Arumugam T, Li D, Anderson MA, Bamberger AM, Greenson J, Brand RE, Ramachandran V and Logsdon CD: CEACAM1, a novel serum biomarker for pancreatic cancer. Pancreas. 34:436–443. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

20 

Blumenthal RD, Leon E, Hansen HJ and Goldenberg DM: Expression patterns of CEACAM5 and CEACAM6 in primary and metastatic cancers. BMC Cancer. 7:22007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

21 

Hauck W, Nédellec P, Turbide C, Stanners CP, Barnett TR and Beauchemin N: Transcriptional control of the human biliary glycoprotein gene, a CEA gene family member down-regulated in colorectal carcinomas. Eur J Biochem. 223:529–541. 1994. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Related Articles

Journal Cover

August-2018
Volume 16 Issue 2

Print ISSN: 1792-1074
Online ISSN:1792-1082

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Han ZM, Huang HM and Sun YW: Effect of CEACAM‑1 knockdown in human colorectal cancer cells. Oncol Lett 16: 1622-1626, 2018
APA
Han, Z., Huang, H., & Sun, Y. (2018). Effect of CEACAM‑1 knockdown in human colorectal cancer cells. Oncology Letters, 16, 1622-1626. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2018.8835
MLA
Han, Z., Huang, H., Sun, Y."Effect of CEACAM‑1 knockdown in human colorectal cancer cells". Oncology Letters 16.2 (2018): 1622-1626.
Chicago
Han, Z., Huang, H., Sun, Y."Effect of CEACAM‑1 knockdown in human colorectal cancer cells". Oncology Letters 16, no. 2 (2018): 1622-1626. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2018.8835