Apigenin inhibits the proliferation and invasion of osteosarcoma cells by suppressing the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway

Introduction

Osteosarcoma (OS) is the most common form of malignant bone tumor and occurs most frequently in children and adolescents (1). It is highly aggressive, expands into the cortex of the bone, later erupts through the cortex into the soft tissues, and frequently leads to the development of micrometastases in the lung (1,2). The primary treatment of osteosarcoma is the complete removal of tumor by wide excision with neo-adjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy (2). Despite progress in chemotherapy, the prognosis remains particularly poor for patients with recurrence and metastasis. This is largely attributed to a lack of complete understanding of the exact mechanisms for this malignancy. Therefore, further understanding of the molecular mechanisms of cancer progression and the development of new therapeutic tools based on these mechanisms are required.

The Wnt-β-catenin signaling pathway regulates a variety of genes that in turn orchestrate diverse cell functions such as morphogenesis, differentiation and proliferation (3). It also plays an important role in tumorigenesis and its aberrant activation has been associated with the pathogenesis of various tumors in human (4–6). It has been reported that salinomycin selectively targets OS stem cells possibly by inhibiting the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway (7), which suggests that Wnt/β-catenin may be important in OS.

Apigenin (4′,5,7-trihydroxyflavone), a type of flavonoid, is widely contained in many fruits and vegetables such as oranges, tea, chamomile, onions and wheat sprouts (8). Findings of previous studies have demonstrated that apigenin inhibits the growth, invasion, and metastasis of tumors in vitro and in vivo (9–11). Results of a recent study showed that apigenin possesses anticancer properties for the induction of apoptosis in U2OS cells and inhibits the xenograft tumor growth (12). However, the precise molecular mechanisms of the anticancer effect of apigenin remain to be clarified.

In the present study, we investigated the effects of apigenin on OS cell proliferation and invasion. Furthermore, we investigated the molecular mechanisms of the anticancer effect of apigenin.

Materials and methods

Cell culture

The U2OS and MG63 human OS cell lines were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection. U2OS cells were maintained in McCoy’s 5A medium, which was supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), penicillin (100 U/ml), and streptomycin (100 μg/ml) at 37μC with 5% CO2. MG-63 cells were maintained in Eagle’s minimum essential medium in 5% CO2 at 37μC.

MTT assay

Cell viability was determined by the MTT assay. In brief, cells were plated in 96-well plates at 3×104 cells per well. At 24, 48, 72, and 96 h post plating, the cells were treated with various concentrations of apigenin, and ~20 μl MTT reagent (5 mg/ml) was added into each well and then incubated at 37μC for 30 min. To dissolve formazan crystals, culture medium was replaced with an equal volume of DMSO. After the mixture was agitated at room temperature for 10 min, the absorbance of each well was determined at 490 nm using a microplate reader. Experiments were repeated in triplicate and the results are presented as the percentage of growth inhibition.

Cell cycle assay

The cells were seeded in 6-well plates and treated with various doses of apigenin or DMSO for 24 h. The cells were harvested and resuspended in 200 μl ice-cold phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), added to 4 ml ice-cold ethanol and incubated on ice for 45 min. After an additional washing, the cells were incubated with RNase A (20 μg/ml) at 37μC for 30 min, stained with propidium iodide (100 μg/ml; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) for 10 min, and analyzed with flow cytometry.

Cell invasion assay

Cell invasion was measured using a modified Matrigel Boyden chamber (BD Bioscience, Bedford, MA, USA) (13). The cells were treated with various concentrations of apigenin or pretreatment of cells with apigenin was treated with overexpression-β-catenin or siRNA-β-catenin for 4 h, and then seeded in the upper compartment. The medium including 10% FBS was added into the lower compartment. After 48 h, the cells that filtered through the lower side of the membrane were stained with hematoxylin and eosin and quantified by counting five high-power fields in the center of each well.

Quantitative PCR

Total RNA was extracted from the cells using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Quantitative PCR (qPCR) reactions were performed on the Bio-Rad iQ5 real-time thermal cyclers using SYBR® Premix Ex Taq™ II kit (Takara, Dalian, China). The specific primers used were: β-catenin sense: 5′-TGAGGACAAGC CACAAGATTAC-3′ and antisense: 5′-TCCACCAGAGTGAA AAGAACG-3′; β-actin sense: 5′-GATCATTGCTCCTCCTG AGC-3′ and antisense: 5′-ACTCCTGCTTGCTGATCCAC-3′. These primers were synthesized by Sangon Biotech Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). The PCR procedure was as follows: polymerase activation for 30 sec at 95μC, 40 cycles of amplification each consisting of 95μC for 5 sec, 60μC for 20 sec, and 1 cycle of dissociation consisting of 95μC for 15 sec, 60μC for 30 sec and 95μC for 15 sec. Relative quantification of gene expression was performed using the 2−ΔΔCt method and with β-actin mRNA as an internal control. The reactions were performed in triplicate.

Western blot analysis

The cells were sonicated with lysis buffer (PBS with 1% Triton X-100 and protease inhibitors). The cell lysate supernatants were harvested by centrifugation at 10,000 rpm for 10 min at 4μC. Protein concentrations of the cell supernatants were evaluated and measured by BCA Protein Assay kit. An equal amount of the proteins from each extract was separated on a SDS-PAGE, and transferred electrophoretically using PVDF membranes. The membranes were then blocked by 5% non-fat dry milk in PBST [PBS with 0.1% Tween-20, (pH 7.6)] for 1 h at room temperature and probed overnight with appropriate primary antibodies (anti-β-catenin or anti-β-actin) diluted in PBST at 4μC. The membranes were rinsed three times with PBST and incubated with appropriate secondary antibodies diluted in PBST for 1 h at room temperature. The membranes were then rinsed three times with PBST at room temperature for 10 min, and the blots were visualized by enhanced chemiluminescence using Kodak X-omat LS film (Eastman Kodak, Rochester, NY, USA). The protein level quantification was carried out by ImageJ (Molecular Dynamics, Sunnyvale, CA, USA).

Plasmid construction and transfection

Total RNA from U2OS cells was extracted using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The cDNA was synthesized by reverse transcription of total RNA, using the Prime Script® RT reagent kit (Takara, Dalian, China) with oligo-dT primers, according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The open reading frame of β-catenin cDNA was subsequently cloned into the pcDNA3.1 vector (Invitrogen) to construct the recombinant pcDNA3.1-β-catenin expression vector. In addition, lentivirus-mediated siRNA constructs were designed by Shanghai Genechem (Shanghai, China). The sequences corresponding to the siRNA of β-catenin were: sense: 5′-UGGUUGCCUUGCUCAAdTdT-3′ and antisense: 5′-UUGUUGAGCAAGGCAACCAdTdT-3′. For the in vitro transfection, cells (5×104) were seeded in each of the 24-well microplates, grown for 24 h to reach 50% confluency, and then incubated with a mixture of overexpression-β-catenin or siRNA-β-catenin and Lipofectamine 2000 reagent (Invitrogen) in 100 μl serum-free Opti-Mem according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The transfection efficiency was examined by qPCR and western blotting.

Statistical analysis

Data were presented as the mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). The differences between the control and apigenin-treated groups were compared by Dunnett’s test subsequent to ANOVA. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference. All the experiments were repeated at least three times.

Results

Cytotoxicity of apigenin on OS cells

We measured the effect of apigenin on OS cell proliferation by MTT assay. As shown in Fig. 1, there was a marked decrease in the proliferation of cells with increasing doses of apigenin. Apigenin inhibited cell proliferation in a time- and dose-dependent manner in the U2OS and MG-63 cells. These findings suggested that apigenin was able to inhibit the proliferation and survival of U2OS and MG-63 cells.

Figure 1 Apigenin inhibits OS cell proliferation. (A) U2OS and (B) MG63 cells were treated with apigenin (0–100 μg/ml) for 24, 48, 72 and 96 h, and cell viability was detected using MTT assay. Results are presented as means ± SD of three independent experiments.

Effect of apigenin on OS cell cycle

We investigated the effect of apigenin on the OS cell cycle. As shown in Fig. 2, compared to the control group, apigenin-treated cells exhibited obvious cell arrest in the G0/G1 phase after 24 h. The increase in the G0/G1 cell population was accompanied by a concomitant decrease in the population in the S and G2/M phases of the cell cycle. These results indicated that the decreased proliferation in apigenin-treated OS cells is at least partially a result of the cell cycle arrest by apigenin.

Figure 2 Apigenin induces OS cell cycle arrest. (A) U2OS and (C) MG63 cells were treated with increasing doses of apigenin or vehicle DMSO for 24 h. Cell-cycle distributions were analyzed by flow cytometry with PI staining. Percentages of cell cycle distribution in (B) U2OS and (D) MG63 cells are presented as an histogram graph. All experiments were repeated at least three times. *P<0.05, &P<0.05, #P<0.05, compared with control group.

Effect of apigenin on OS cell invasion

Provided the development of metastasis is highly dependent on cell migration and invasion (14), we investigated the impact of apigenin on OS cell invasion by a modified Matrigel Boyden chamber. As shown in Fig. 3, after treatment with apigenin, the number of invaded cells was significantly decreased, as compared with the control group. These findings indicate that apigenin inhibited the invasion of U2OS and MG-63 cells. However, U2OS is more sensitive for apigenin treatment, which was selected for the subsequent experiments.

Figure 3 Apigenin treatment inhibits OS cell invasion. Invasion was evaluated using Matrigel Boyden chambers. The number of migration cells through the Matrigel-coated membrane was decreased in (A) U2OS and (B) MG63 cells treated with apigenin. Data are presented as mean ± SD. All experiments were repeated at least three times. *P<0.05 compared to the control group.

Apigenin inhibited the expression of β-catenin in OS cells

We investigated a potential mechanism for apigenin-mediated OS cell proliferation and invasion. It is well known that the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway modulates cancer cell proliferation, apoptosis and metastasis, therefore, we examined whether apigenin was able to inhibit the expression of β-catenin. As shown in Fig. 4A, as compared with the control group, obvious downregulation of β-catenin mRNA was identified in OS cells when treated with apigenin. Simultaneously, the corresponding decrease in β-catenin protein levels was also confirmed by western blotting (Fig. 4B). These data suggested that apigenin inhibited the expression of β-catenin in OS cells.

Figure 4 Effect of apigenin on expression of β-catenin in U2OS cells. (A) Representative images of relative mRNA level of β-catenin treated with various concentrations of apigenin. (B) Representative western blots of β-catenin. The expression levels of proteins were normalized based on the β-actin levels. Data are presented as mean ± SD. All experiments were repeated at least three times. *P<0.05 compared to the control.

Overexpression of β-catenin reversed the inhibitory effect of apigenin on OS cells

The role of β-catenin in apigenin-mediated phenotypes was then evaluated. In this study, we found that the mRNA and protein levels of β-catenin in the overexpression-β-catenin-transfected group were significantly higher than those in the mock group (Fig. 5A and B). We also examined whether overexpression of β-catenin reversed the inhibitory effect of apigenin on OS cells. As expected, following treatment with β-catenin overexpression, the inhibitory effect of apigenin on proliferation and invasion was significantly reversed in OS cells, as compared with the mock group (Fig. 5C and D).

Figure 5 Overexpression of β-catenin reverses the inhibitory effect of apigenin on OS cells. (A) Representative images of relative mRNA level of β-catenin treated with overexpression-β-catenin. (B) Representative western blots of overexpression-β-catenin. (C) Overexpression-β-catenin reversed apigenin-inhibited OS cell proliferation. (D) Overexpression-β-catenin reversed apigenin-inhibited OS cell invasion. *P<0.05, compared with the mock group.

Knockdown of β-catenin enhanced apigenin-inhibited proliferation and invasion in OS cells

To confirm the role of β-catenin in OS cell proliferation and invasion, a siRNA experiment was performed in OS cells. The mRNA and protein levels of β-catenin in the siRNA-β-catenin-transfected group were significantly lower than those in the mock group (Fig. 6A and B). We also examined the effect of knockdown of β-catenin on the activity of apigenin, including the inhibition of cell proliferation and invasion. The results showed that siRNA-β- catenin obviously potentiated apigenin-induced proliferation inhibition (Fig. 6C). Moreover, siRNA-β-catenin significantly promoted apigenin-induced invasion inhibition (Fig. 6D). The results indicated that knockdown of β-catenin enhanced apigenin-inhibited proliferation and invasion in OS cells.

Figure 6 Knockdown of β-catenin enhances apigenin-inhibited proliferation and invasion in OS cells. (A) mRNA and (B) protein levels of β-catenin in the siRNA-β-catenin-transfected group. (C) siRNA-β-catenin enhanced apigenin-inhibited OS cell proliferation. (D) siRNA-β-catenin enhanced apigenin-inhibited OS cell invasion. *P<0.05, compared with the mock group.

Discussion

Apigenin, a naturally occurring plant flavone that is abundantly present in common fruits and vegetables, is a bioactive flavonoid shown to possess anticancer properties. However, the molecular mechanism involved in the anticancer effect of apigenin in OS has yet to be elucidated. In the present study, we found that apigenin exhibits anti-proliferative and anti-invasive activity in OS cells. In addition, apigenin was able to downregulate the expression of β-catenin. Overexpression of β-catenin reversed the inhibitory effect of apigenin on OS cells, and knockdown of β-catenin enhanced apigenin-inhibited proliferation and invasion in OS cells.

Findings of previous studies have demonstrated that apigenin inhibited pancreatic cancer cell proliferation in a dose-dependent manner (11), and it also inhibited the migration and invasion of A2780 human ovarian cancer cells (15). Furthermore, OS tumorigenesis is often associated with tumor cell proliferation and invasion (16). Therefore, we investigated the effects of apigenin on OS cell proliferation and invasion. Consistent with previous studies, results of the present study demonstrate that apigenin inhibited the proliferation and invasion of OS cells in vitro.

The Wnt pathway consists of highly conserved secreted ligands that bind cell-surface receptors known as frizzled proteins and lipoprotein receptor-related proteins (LRPs). In the presence of Wnt signaling, β-catenin is accumulated in the cytosol, translocated into the nucleus, and forms a complex with the lymphocyte enhancer factor (LEF)/T-cell factor (TCF) family of transcription factors to activate target genes (17). β-catenin was shown to promote tumorigenesis, progression, and invasion in cancers (6,18,19). For example, it is overexpressed in human glioblastoma, and knockdown of β-catenin inhibits glioblastoma cell proliferation and invasive ability, and induces apoptotic cell death (20). Furthermore, the intratumoral introduction of siRNA targeting β-catenin into established subcutaneous gliomas also delayed tumor growth. In OS, several secreted protein families modulate the Wnt/β-catenin signaling, including secreted Frizzled-related proteins (sFRPs), Wnt inhibitory protein (WIF), Dickkopf proteins, sclerostin, and small molecules. It was shown that the Wnt inhibitory factor 1 is epigenetically silenced in human osteosarcoma, and its disruption accelerates osteosarcoma development in mice (21). In a recent study, it was shown that a high β-catenin level in OS samples is positively correlated with lung metastasis (22). Therefore, we hypothesize that apigenin downregulates the expression of β-catenin. In this study, we found that apigenin downregulates the expression of β-catenin in OS cells.

The canonical Wnt-β-catenin signaling pathway is a key component of normal skeletal development and disease. Aberrant activation of the Wnt-β-catenin signaling pathway plays a critical role in OS pathogenesis (23). It has been reported that a decreased β-catenin expression can suppress matrix metalloproteinase 14 (MMP14) expression, thereby resulting in suppression of the invasion and motility of MG-63 cells (24). In this study, we found that overexpression of β-catenin reversed the inhibitory effect of apigenin on OS cells, and knockdown of β-catenin enhanced apigenin-inhibited proliferation and invasion in OS cells. These results support the hypothesis that β-catenin is involved in OS cell proliferation and invasion in response to apigenin.

In conclusion, the present study suggests that apigenin is particularly effective in inhibiting proliferation and invasion of OS cells by suppressing the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway. Therefore, apigenin may be a chemopreventive and/or therapeutic agent in the prevention of OS cancer.

References