Comparison of treatments for bullous keratopathy in rabbits

Zhao,Haixia; Luo,Yunna; Niu,Chunmei; Guan,Wenying

doi:10.3892/etm.2013.1025

Comparison of treatments for bullous keratopathy in rabbits

Authors:
- Haixia Zhao
- Yunna Luo
- Chunmei Niu
- Wenying Guan
View Affiliations

Affiliations: Department of Ophthalmology, The Affiliated Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical College, Hohhot, Inner Mongolia 010050, P.R. China
Published online on: March 21, 2013 https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2013.1025
Pages: 1481-1485

Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )

Metrics: Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )

Cited By (CrossRef): 0 citations Loading Articles...

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to compare deep lamellar endothelial keratoplasty (DLEK) and penetrating keratoplasty (PK) treatments for bullous keratopathy (BK). In total, 36 healthy New Zealand white rabbits were randomly divided into 3 groups termed the experimental, DLEK and PK groups. The experimental control group received no treatment. The DLEK and PK groups were observed for corneal astigmatism at 1, 2, or 3 months post‑surgery using a corneal topography instrument and a slit lamp microscope. The incidence of immune rejection after 3 months of recovery was determined using hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining. The corneal specimens from the surgery groups were compared with those from the control group. In the 12 rabbit eyes that underwent the DLEK surgery, the central cornea became clear after 1 week. After 3 months, these corneas were almost transparent and no eye infections or other complications were observed in 10 of the eyes, while surgical perforations in 2 eyes led to surgical lamellar failure. In the PK surgery group, in which 12 rabbit eyes were also treated, nine were almost transparent after 3 months of recovery, while three eyes were immunologically rejected due to the corneal grafts. The occurrences of corneal astigmatism that were observed following DLEK and PK treatment were significantly different after 1, 2 and 3 months of recovery (P<0.05). Normal corneal staining was observed in the DLEK and PK rabbits subjected to H&E staining after 3 months of recovery. A BK animal model was established by curetting the Descemet's membrane (DM film). In comparison with PK, DLEK is a superior surgical treatment for BK.

View Figures

View References

1.	Wu ZQ, Yang YN and Xing YQ: Current progress on etiology and clinical treatment bullous keratopathy. Recent Advances In Ophthalmology. 27:625–629. 2007.
2.	Mamalis N, Anderson CW, Kreisler KR, et al: Changing trends in the indications for penetrating keratoplasty. Arch Ophthalmol. 110:1409–1411. 1992. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
3.	Lindquist TD, McGlothan JS, Rotkis WM and Chandler JW: Indications for penetrating keratoplasty: 1980–1988. Cornea. 10:210–216. 1991.
4.	Beekhuis WH: Current clinician’s opinions on risk factors in corneal grafting. Results of a survey among surgeons in the eurotransplant area. Cornea. 14:39–42. 1995.
5.	Li L and He SK: Lamellar keratoplasty. Ophthalmology research. 20:370–372. 2002.
6.	Maeno A, Naor J, Lee HM, Hunter WS and Rootman DS: Three decades of corneal transplantation: indications and patient characteristics. Cornea. 19:7–11. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
7.	Archila EA: Deep lamellar keratoplasty dissection of host tissue with intrastromol air injection. Cornea. 3:217–218. 1985.PubMed/NCBI
8.	Chen JQ: Of corneal review and outlook. Chinese Journal of Ophthalmology. 3:182–186. 2005.
9.	Terry MA: A new approach for endothelial transplantation: deep lamellar endothelial keratoplasty. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 43:183–193. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
10.	Terry MA: Endothelial replacement: the limbal pocket approach. Ophthalmol Clin North Am. 16:103–112. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
11.	Xie LX: Chapter 17 section 1. Corneal Transplantation. People’s Health Press; Beijing: pp. 2412000
12.	Melles GR, Lander F, van Dooren BT, Pels E and Beekhuis WH: Preliminary clinical results of posterior lamellar keratoplasty through a sclerocorneal pocket incision. Ophthalmology. 107:1850–1857. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
13.	Busin M, Arffa RC and Sebastiani A: Endokeratoplasty as an alternative to penetrating keratoplasty for the surgical treatment of diseased endothelium: initial results. Ophthalmology. 107:2077–2082. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
14.	Culbertson WW: Endothelial replacement: flap approach. Ophthalmol Clin North Am. 16:113–118. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
15.	Yang CZ and Liu L: Chapter 1. Modern Corneal Transplantation. People’s Military Medical Press; Beijing: pp. 81998
16.	Chung JH and Fagerholm P: Endothelial healing in rabbit corneal alkali wounds. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh). 65:648–656. 1987. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
17.	Minkowski JS, Bartels SP, Delori FC, et al: Corneal endothelial function and structure following cryo-injury in the rabbit. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 25:1416–1425. 1984.PubMed/NCBI
18.	Hirsch M, Renard G, Faure JP and Pouliquen Y: Formation of intercellular spaces and junctions in regenerating rabbit corneal endothelium. Exp Eye Res. 23:385–397. 1976. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
19.	Li N and Zou L: Selective removal of interrupted sutures for the controls of post keratoplasty astigmatism. Chinese Journal of Practical Ophthalmology. 20:532–533. 2002.(In Chinese).