|
1
|
Parinaud J, Mieusset R, Vieitez G, Labal B
and Richoilley G: Influence of sperm parameters on embryo quality.
Fertil Steril. 60:888–892. 1993.PubMed/NCBI
|
|
2
|
Braude P, Bolton V and Moore S: Human gene
expression first occurs between the four-and eight-cell stages of
preimplantation development. Nature. 332:459–461. 1988. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
3
|
Tesarik J, Greco E and Mendoza C: Late,
but not early, paternal effect on human embryo development is
related to sperm DNA fragmentation. Hum Reprod. 19:611–615. 2004.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
4
|
Tesarik J: Paternal effects on cell
division in the human preimplantation embryo. Reprod Biomed Online.
10:370–375. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
5
|
Cohen-Bacrie P: Sperm quality and
selection. J Gynecol Obstet Bio Reprod (Paris). 37(Suppl 1): S4–S8.
2008.(In French).
|
|
6
|
Palermo G, Joris H, Devroey P and Van
Steirteghem AC: Pregnancies after intracytoplasmic injection of
single spermatozoon into an oocyte. Lancet. 340:17–18. 1992.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
7
|
Van Steirteghem AC, Nagy Z, Joris H, Lui
J, Staessen C, Smitz J, Wisanto A and Devroey P: High fertilization
and implantation rates after intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Hum
Reprod. 8:1061–1066. 1993.
|
|
8
|
Aboulghar MA, Mansour RT, Serour GI,
Sattar MA and Amin YM: Intracytoplasmic sperm injection and
conventional in vitro fertilization for sibling oocytes in cases of
unexplained infertility and borderline semen. J Assist Reprod
Genet. 13:38–42. 1996. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
9
|
Aboulghar MA, Mansour RT, Serour GI and
Amin YM: The role of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) in the
treatment of patients with borderline semen. Hum Reprod.
10:2829–2830. 1995.PubMed/NCBI
|
|
10
|
Nagy ZP, Liu J, Joris H, Verheyen G,
Tournaye H, Camus M, Derde MC, Devroey P and Van Steirteghem AC:
The result of intracytoplasmic sperm injection is not related to
any of the three basic sperm parameters. Hum Reprod. 10:1123–1129.
1995.PubMed/NCBI
|
|
11
|
Cohen J, Alikani M, Munné S and Palermo G:
Micromanipulation in clinical managment of fertility disorders.
Semin Reprod Endocrinol. 12:151–168. 1994. View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
12
|
Riedel HH, Hübner F, Ensslen SC, Bieniek
KW and Grillo M: Minimal andrological requirements for in-vitro
fertilization. Hum Reprod. 4(8 Suppl): 73–77. 1989. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
13
|
Enginsu ME, Dumoulin JC, Pieters MH, Evers
JL and Geraedts JP: Predictive value of morphologically normal
sperm concentration in the medium for in-vitro fertilization. Int J
Androl. 16:113–120. 1993. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
14
|
Petersen CG, Mauri AL, Ferreira R, Baruffi
RL and Franco Júnior JG: Embryo selection by the first cleavage
parameter between 25 and 27 hours after ICSI. J Assist Reprod
Genet. 18:209–212. 2001.PubMed/NCBI
|
|
15
|
Gardner DK and Lane M: Culture and
selection of viable blastocysts: a feasible proposition for human
IVF? Hum Reprod Update. 3:367–382. 1997. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
16
|
Lucas H, Lammers J, Pfeffer J, Aknin I,
Carré-Pigeon F, Jafou N, Paulus JM and Sifer C: Conventional IVF
versus ICSI in sibling oocytes: a French experience analysis for
BLEFCO. Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 38:515–520. 2010.(In French).
|
|
17
|
Shoukir Y, Chardonnens D, Campana A and
Sakkas D: Blastocyst development from supernumerary embryos after
intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a paternal influence? Hum Reprod.
13:1632–1637. 1998. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
18
|
Aytoz A, Camus M, Tournaye H, Bonduelle M,
Van Steirteghem A and Devroey P: Outcome of pregnancies after
intracytoplasmic sperm injection and the effect of sperm origin and
quality on this outcome. Fertil Steril. 70:500–505. 1998.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
19
|
Palermo GD, Schlegel PN, Hariprashad JJ,
Ergün B, Mielnik A, Zaninovic N, Veeck LL and Rosenwaks Z:
Fertilization and pregnancy outcome with intracytoplasmic sperm
injection for azoospermic men. Hum Reprod. 14:741–748. 1999.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
20
|
Coetzee K, Kruge TF and Lombard CJ:
Predictive value of normal sperm morphology: a structured
literature review. Hum Reprod Update. 4:73–82. 1998. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
21
|
Duran EH, Gürgan T, Günalp S, Enginsu ME,
Yarali H and Ayhan A: A logistic regression model including DNA
status and morphology of spermatozoa for prediction of
fertilization in vitro. Hum Reprod. 13:1235–1239. 1998. View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
22
|
Mansour RT, Aboulghar MA, Serour GI, Amin
YM and Ramzi AM: The effect of sperm parameters on the outcome of
intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Fertil Steril. 64:982–986.
1995.PubMed/NCBI
|
|
23
|
Küpker W, Schulze W and Diedrich K:
Ultrastructure of gametes and intracytoplasmic sperm injection: the
significance of sperm morphology. Hum Reprod. 13(Suppl 1): 99–106.
1998.PubMed/NCBI
|
|
24
|
Lundin K, Söderlund B and Hamberger L: The
relationship between sperm morphology and rates of fertilization,
pregnancy and spontaneous abortion in an in-vitro
fertilization/intracytoplazmic sperm injection programme. Hum
Reprod. 12:2676–2681. 1997. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
25
|
Svalander P, Jakobsson AH, Forsberg AS,
Bengtsson AC and Wikland M: The outcome of intracytoplasmic sperm
injection is unrelated to ‘strict criteria’ sperm morphology. Hum
Reprod. 11:1019–1022. 1996.
|
|
26
|
De Vos A: Intracytoplasmic sperm injection
(ICSI). Hum Reprod. 15(Suppl 4): 59–64. 2000.PubMed/NCBI
|
|
27
|
Fishel S, Aslam I, Lisi F, Rinaldi L,
Timson J, Jacobson M, Gobetz L, Green S, Campbell A and Lisi R:
Should ICSI be the treatment of choice for all cases of in-vitro
conception? Hum Reprod. 15:1278–1283. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
28
|
French DB, Sabanegh ES Jr, Goldfarb J and
Desai N: Does severe teratozoospermia affect blastocyst formation,
live birth rate, and other clinical outcome parameters in ICSI
cycles? Fertil Steril. 93:1097–1103. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
29
|
Bonduelle M, Camus M, De Vos A, Staessen
C, Tournaye H, Van Assche E, Verheyen G, Devroey P, Liebaers I and
Van Steirteghem A: Seven years of intracytoplasmic sperm injection
and follow-up of 1987 subsequent children. Hum Reprod. 14(Suppl 1):
243–264. 1999.PubMed/NCBI
|
|
30
|
Hansen M, Kurinczuk JJ, Bower C and Webb
S: The risk of major birth defects after intracytoplasmic sperm
injection and in vitro fertilization. New Engl J Med. 346:725–730.
2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
31
|
Bonduelle M, Wennerholm UB, Loft A,
Tarlatzis BC, Peters C, Henriet S, Mau C, Victorin-Cederquist A,
Van Steirteghem A, Balaska A, Emberson JR and Sutcliffe AG: A
multi-centre cohort study of the physical health of 5-year-old
children conceived after intracytoplasmic sperm injection, in vitro
fertilization and natural conception. Hum Reprod. 20:413–419.
2005.
|
|
32
|
Davies MJ, Moore VM, Willson DK, Van Essen
P, Priest K, Scott H, Haan EA and Chan A: Reproductive technologies
and the risk of birth defects. New Engl J Med. 366:1803–1813. 2012.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
33
|
Katalinic A, Rösch C and Ludwig M; German
ICSI Follow-Up Study Group. Pregnancy course and outcome after
intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a controlled, prospective cohort
study. Fertil Steril. 81:1604–1616. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
34
|
Wennerholm UB, Söderström-Anttila V, Bergh
C, Aittomäki K, Hazekamp J, Nygren KG, Selbing A and Loft A:
Children born after cryopreservation of embryos or oocytes: a
systematic review of outcome data. Hum Reprod. 24:2158–2172. 2009.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
35
|
Kirkegaard K, Agerholm IE and Ingerslev
HJ: Time-lapse monitoring as a tool for clinical embryo assessment.
Hum Reprod. 27:1277–1285. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
