Low‑molecular‑weight heparin and intermittent pneumatic compression for thromboprophylaxis in critical patients

  • Authors:
    • Bing Wan
    • Hai‑Yan Fu
    • Jiang‑Tao Yin
    • Guo‑Qing Ren
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: October 13, 2015     https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2015.2795
  • Pages: 2331-2336
Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

The efficacy and safety of physiotherapeutic prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism in critically ill patients with heparin contraindication remains unclear. In the present study it was hypothesized that physiotherapy prophylaxis with intermittent pneumatic compression (IPC) would be safe and effective for patients unable to receive low‑molecular‑weight heparin (LMWH). In addition, this study investigated whether a combined therapy of IPC with LMWH would be more effective for the prophylaxis of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in critical patients. A total of 500 patients were divided into four groups according to the prophylaxis of DVT. The IPC group consisted of 95 patients with heparin contraindication that received IPC treatment; the LMWH group consisted of 185 patients that received an LMWH injection; the LMWH + IPC group consisted of 75 patients that received IPC treatment and LMWH injection; and the control group consisted of 145 patients that received no IPC treatment or injection of LMWH. Each patient was evaluated clinically for development of DVT and the diagnosis was confirmed by Doppler study. Venous thromboembolism was a common complication among the trauma patients with severe injuries. Patients responded positively to the treatment used in the intervention groups. Patients exhibited an improved response to LMWH + ICP compared with IPC or LMWH alone, while no significant difference was detected between the IPC and LMWH groups. These results were applicable to patients that had a Wells score of ≥3; however, no significant differences in DVT incidence were observed among the patients who had a Wells score of <3. In this observational study, LMWH + ICP appeared to be more effective than either treatment alone in treating critically ill trauma patients with severe injuries that are at high risk for VTE and bleeding simultaneously.
View Figures
View References

Related Articles

Journal Cover

December-2015
Volume 10 Issue 6

Print ISSN: 1792-0981
Online ISSN:1792-1015

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Wan B, Fu HY, Yin JT and Ren GQ: Low‑molecular‑weight heparin and intermittent pneumatic compression for thromboprophylaxis in critical patients. Exp Ther Med 10: 2331-2336, 2015
APA
Wan, B., Fu, H., Yin, J., & Ren, G. (2015). Low‑molecular‑weight heparin and intermittent pneumatic compression for thromboprophylaxis in critical patients. Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine, 10, 2331-2336. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2015.2795
MLA
Wan, B., Fu, H., Yin, J., Ren, G."Low‑molecular‑weight heparin and intermittent pneumatic compression for thromboprophylaxis in critical patients". Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine 10.6 (2015): 2331-2336.
Chicago
Wan, B., Fu, H., Yin, J., Ren, G."Low‑molecular‑weight heparin and intermittent pneumatic compression for thromboprophylaxis in critical patients". Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine 10, no. 6 (2015): 2331-2336. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2015.2795