Open Access

Diagnostic value of contrast‑enhanced ultrasound in papillary thyroid microcarcinoma

  • Authors:
    • Hong Yan Chen
    • Wei Yan Liu
    • Hui Zhu
    • Dao Wen Jiang
    • Dong Hua Wang
    • Yongqi Chen
    • Weihua Li
    • Gaofeng Pan
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: February 19, 2016     https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2016.3094
  • Pages: 1555-1562
  • Copyright: © Chen et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License.

Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

The aim of the present study was to explore the value and characteristics of contrast‑enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in the diagnosis of papillary thyroid microcarcinoma (PTMC). By analyzing CEUS information of 130 nodules obtained from 106 patients with PTMC, who had been diagnosed by surgery and pathological analysis, CEUS characteristics of PTMC nodules were concluded. Based on the results, the PTMC nodules were divided into three groups as follows: 32 nodules (24.62%) were found to be enhanced earlier than the surrounding normal thyroid tissue, 95 nodules (73.08%) were enhanced at the same time as the normal thyroid tissue and 3 nodules (2.30%) were enhanced later than the normal thyroid tissue. The results also demonstrated that the peak enhancement intensity of the 130 nodules was lower compared with the irregular intensity of the normal parenchyma in corresponding thyroids, and that PTMC enhancement washed out faster than in normal thyroid parenchyma. In conclusion, the PTMC characteristics that CEUS can detect may improve the diagnostic accuracy and provide valuable information for the treatment of the disease.

Introduction

The incidence of thyroid cancer has gradually increased in recent years, and it is currently the most common endocrine tumor (1). Thyroid microcarcinoma is defined as a thyroid tumor ≤10 mm in diameter, and 65–99% of these tumors are papillary thyroid microcarcinomas (PTMCs) (2). In recent years, the incidence of papillary thyroid carcinoma has increased significantly, specifically for PTMC (by 24% in patients aged >45 years) (3). The diagnosis of PTMC relies on imaging techniques, since the lesions are difficult to assess and easily misdiagnosed due to their small size (4). In particular, ultrasound examination is preferred for small thyroid lesions, and quantitative contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) can clearly define the microvascularity of small carcinoma nodules (5). The diagnosis rate using palpation is low and the diagnostic specificity of computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (CT/MRI) is poor when PTMC nodules are <10 mm in diameter (2). Therefore, the aim of the present study was to investigate the value of CEUS in the diagnosis of PTMC.

Materials and methods

Patient samples

Between July 2013 and April 2014, 106 patients (14 male, 92 female) with a total of 130 thyroid nodules treated at the Minhang Central Hospital (Shanghai, China) were included in this study. All patients underwent CEUS prior to surgery and pathological diagnosis. The mean age of the patients was 41 years (age range, 23–66 years), and the mean diameter of the thyroid nodules was 6.1 mm (range, 1.9–10 mm; 54 nodules measured 2–5 mm and 76 nodules measured 5–10 mm in diameter). In total, 12 patients had two nodules and 5 patients had multiple nodules. Following two-dimensional and color Doppler ultrasound examination, a nodule diameter of ≥10 mm with calcification, or a longitudinal/transverse length >1 was characteristic of malignant nodules. All PTMC nodules were confirmed by surgery and pathological analysis. Following the surgical procedure the tissue samples were fixed with 10% neutral formaldehyde (Shanghai Xi Hua Trade Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China) prior to being embedded with paraffin (Long Tu Was Industry Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China), sectioned using a Leica-RM2235 microtome (Leica Microsystems GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany) and stained with hematoxylin and eosin (Hongqiao Shanghai Lexiang Medical Reagent Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China). The sections were then observed and images were captured using a microscope (Olympus-BX51; Olympus Corporation, Tokyo, Japan). Pathological diagnosis was conducted based on the presence of the following: Papillary tumor cell growth, ground-glass opacity nuclei and nuclear grooves.

Imaging

High resolution B-mode and color Doppler ultrasound imaging of the thyroid gland was performed by an experienced examiner using a linear ultrasound transducer (5–12 MHz; Aplio XG SSA 790A; Toshiba Corp., Tokyo, Japan). Three ultrasound nodule characteristics were associated with a risk of thyroid cancer: Micro calcifications, size >2 cm and solid composition (6). Following B-mode and Doppler evaluation, CEUS examination was performed. Instrument parameters were kept consistent and were as follows: 0.19 mechanical index, 3.5 cm depth and overall gain between 72 and 80%. Prior to CEUS examination, patients were administered an intravenous bolus of 2.4 ml SonoVue (Bracco S.p.A., Milan, Italy) followed by a bolus injection of 5 ml 0.9% NaCl. Digital cine loops were recorded and stored for 3 min starting immediately after SonoVue administration, which allowed a retrospective independent evaluation to be conducted by two physicians with >10 years of experience in ultrasonic diagnosis. The parameters recorded and reviewed included the arrival time, enhancement intensity, internal enhancement, edge enhancement and wash-out time of SonoVue in PTMC nodules.

Arrival time

The perfusion time between the SonoVue injection and its appearance in the nodules was recorded as the arrival time. The patients were divided into three groups based on the relative arrival time: Earlier, same or later arrival time compared with that surrounding the normal thyroid parenchyma.

Enhancement intensity

The peak enhancement intensity of the PTMC nodules and the surrounding normal thyroid parenchyma were analyzed and compared. Peak enhancement intensity refers to the patterns and features of PTMC at peak time. In total, there were three PTMC nodule enhancement groups as follows: Hypo-enhancement, iso-enhancement and hyper-enhancement. In hypo-enhancement the peak value and the area under the curve of the nodules were lower than the normal surroundings tissues. In iso-enhancement the peak value and the area under the curve of the nodules were the same as the normal surroundings tissues. In hyper-enhancement the peak value and the area under the curve of the nodules were higher than the normal surroundings tissues

Internal enhancement

The internal enhancement of PTMC nodules was determined in relation to the homogeneity of internal enhancement when peak enhancement was reached. The ultrasound images were divided into three groups as follows: Homogeneous enhancement (the nodule exhibited a homogeneous uptake of the contrast medium), inhomogeneous enhancement (the nodule exhibited inhomogeneous uptake of the contrast medium) and local non-enhancement (the nodule did not take up the contrast medium).

Edge enhancement

According to the region intensity and uniformity of the PTMC nodule edge enhancement, the ultrasound images were divided into three groups as follows: Edge regular enhancement, irregular enhancement and non-enhancement. If the nodule and the surrounding normal tissue enhancement were similar, with no clear boundaries, no edge enhancement was present.

Wash-out time

The fading time of the SonoVue agent in the PTMC nodules was compared with the corresponding fading time of the agent in normal thyroid parenchyma. The ultrasound images obtained were divided into three groups as follows: Earlier, same and later wash-out time compared with that in the normal thyroid parenchyma.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 13.0 statistical software (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Comparisons of diagnostic accuracy were performed using the χ2 test. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.

Results

Imaging

Conventional B-mode ultrasound displayed hypoechogenicity in 77 PTMC nodules, 53 of which were inhomogeneous. A total of 69 nodules were round (5 nodules ranging between 2 and 5 mm; 64 nodules ranging between 5 and 10 mm), the aspect ratio (longitudinal diameter/transverse diameter) of 61 nodules was >1.5 (49 nodules between 2 and 5 mm; 12 nodules ranging between 5 and 1 mm) and 39 nodules showed microcalcifications (2 nodules ranging between 2 and 5 mm; 37 nodules ranging between 5 and 10 mm). Color Doppler demonstrated that the blood flow was undetectable in 31 nodules (Fig. 1A) and limited in 82 nodules (Fig. 1B), while a rich blood flow signal was observed in 17 nodules (Fig. 1C). A narrow strip-like or short-rod type blood flow was observed in 76 PTMC nodules (Fig. 1D). Table I presents the sonographic characteristics of PTMC.

Table I.

Sonographic characteristics of papillary thyroid microcarcinoma.

Table I.

Sonographic characteristics of papillary thyroid microcarcinoma.

Nodule diameter

Parameter2–5 mm5–10 mm χ2-testP-value
Echo
  Homogeneous hypoechoic542363.5780.001
  Inhomogeneous hypoechoic05363.5780.001
Round or not
  Yes56471.2080.001
  No491271.2080.001
Longitude/transverse
  >1.5491271.2080.001
  <1.556471.2080.001
Microcalcifacation
  Yes23730.4150.001
  No523930.4150.001
Arrival time, time-to-peak and wash-out time

The arrival time, time-to-peak (time taken for the contrast agent to reach its highest intensity in the nodules) and wash-out time of PTMC nodules ranged between 10.1–16.5 sec (mean time, 13.3±3.2 sec), 16.2–25.4 sec (mean time, 20.8±4.6 sec) and 21.4–32.2 sec (mean time, 26.8±5.4 sec), respectively (Table II). The arrival time, time-to-peak and wash-out time of normal thyroid tissue ranged between 10.5–16.9 sec (mean time, 13.7±3.2 sec), 17.1–26.3 sec (mean time, 21.7±4.6 sec) and 23.7–34.5 sec (mean time, 29.1±5.4 sec), respectively (Table II). The difference in the arrival, time-to-peak and wash-out times between PTMC nodules and normal thyroid tissues was statistically significant (P=0.0001). Therefore, arrival time, time to peak and wash-out time in the PTMC nodules were earlier compared with the surrounding normal tissues.

Table II.

Contrast-enhanced ultrasonic arrival time, time-to-peak and wash-out time of papillary thyroid microcarcinoma.

Table II.

Contrast-enhanced ultrasonic arrival time, time-to-peak and wash-out time of papillary thyroid microcarcinoma.

ParametersPapillary thyroid carcinomaNormal thyroid tissuet-valueP-value
Arrival time13.3±3.213.7±3.25.69280.0001
Time-to-peak20.8±4.621.7±4.610.82880.0001
Wash-out time26.8±5.429.1±5.417.82370.0001

[i] Data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation.

Contrast-enhancement patterns

Based on the enhancement and wash-out times, the contrast-enhanced patterns of 130 PTMC nodules were divided into three groups as follows: 32 nodules (24.62%) were enhanced earlier than normal thyroid tissues (Fig. 2), 95 nodules (73.08%) were enhanced at the same time as normal thyroid tissues (Fig. 3) and 3 nodules (2.30%) were enhanced later than normal thyroid tissues (Fig. 4). All PTMC nodules washed out earlier than normal thyroid tissues.

Imaging features

The imaging features of 130 PTMC nodules from 106 patients were as follows: 125 nodules displayed low internal enhancement with fuzzy edge enhancement or irregular edge enhancement, which washed out faster than in normal thyroid tissues. A further 4 nodules displayed iso-enhancement, and 1 hyper-enhancement. The perfusion pattern mainly displayed dot or short rod inhomogeneity enhancement. This may be attributed to the small size of the nodules (diameter, ≤5 mm), which failed to form the tumor vascular beds and arteriovenous fistulas that are required to provide sufficient blood supply to PTMCs. The CEUS enhancement and fading patterns of PTMCs are presented in Table III.

Table III.

Contrast-enhanced ultrasonic enhancement and fading patterns of papillary thyroid microcarcinoma.

Table III.

Contrast-enhanced ultrasonic enhancement and fading patterns of papillary thyroid microcarcinoma.

Diameter

Parameter2–5 mm (n=54)5–10 mm (n=76)
Enhancement patterns
  Early1220
  Simultaneous4154
  Late12
Enhancement intensities
  Hypo-enhancement5273
  Iso-enhancement22
  Hyper-enhancement01
Internal enhancement
  Homogenous20
  Inhomogenous5276
  Non-enhanced00
Fading patterns
  Early wash-out time5476
  Synchronized00
  Slow wash-out time00
Ultrasound comparisons

Table IV presents the diagnosing values of B-mode ultrasound, color Doppler and CEUS. No statistically significant differences were identified between 2D ultrasound alone or combined with color Doppler in their ability to differentiate between 2–5 mm (χ2=1.069, P=0.586) and 5–10 mm PTMCs (χ2=5.674, P=0.059). However, CEUS was more accurate than 2D ultrasound in differentiating between 2–5 mm (χ2=23.380, P=0.001) and 5–10 mm (χ2=32.734, P=0.001) PTMCs. Furthermore, there were significant differences between CEUS and 2D ultrasound used in conjunction with colour Doppler in differentiating between 2–5 mm (χ2=23.380, P=0.001) and 5–10 mm (χ2=32.734, P=0.001) PTMCs. Finally, CEUS, 2D ultrasound and color Doppler showed no significant difference in their ability to diagnose PTMC. 2D ultrasound used in conjunction with CEUS exhibited the best diagnosis effect. Therefore, CEUS was able to elevate the diagnostic accuracy rate.

Table IV.

Difference among two-dimensional ultrasound, color Doppler and contrast-enhanced ultrasound for diagnosing papillary thyroid microcarcinoma.

Table IV.

Difference among two-dimensional ultrasound, color Doppler and contrast-enhanced ultrasound for diagnosing papillary thyroid microcarcinoma.

Imaging type and nodule diameterMalignantUnclearBenign χ2-testP-value
Two-dimensional ultrasound
  2–5 mm3113101.2590.533
  5–10 mm452291.2590.533
Two-dimensional ultrasound + color Doppler
  2–5 mm361175.3070.070
  5–10 mm551925.3070.070
Contrast-enhanced ultrasound
  2–5 mm52200.1220.727
  5–10 mm72200.1220.727

Discussion

In certain patients with PTMC the disease develops slowly, resulting in longer survival rates (7). PTMC with eosinophilic and high cell variants tend to have a higher degree of malignancy and can easily invade tissue outside of the thyroid; for example, the rate of cervical lymph node metastasis is >80%, resulting in a poor prognosis (8). In the majority of cases, there are no symptoms, however certain lymph node and distant metastases can lead to mortality (7). The early clinical diagnosis of PTMC has therefore become a topic of interest.

The diagnosis rate using palpation is low and the diagnostic specificity of computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (CT/MRI) is poor when PTMC nodules are <10 mm in diameter (9). Despite this, it has been observed that with an improvement in resolution and examiner's experience, ultrasound can detect micronodules and improve the accuracy of the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant nodules (10). Ultrasound has, therefore, become the preferred imaging diagnostic method for PTMC since it is noninvasive, easy to perform and can have an improved ability in diagnosing PTMC compared with CT/MRI.

Conventional high-frequency ultrasound may be used to diagnose malignant thyroid lesions according to the microcalcification in PTMC (sensitivity, 31.5%; specificity, 99.1%) (11). Compared with larger thyroid carcinomas, there is an evident reduction of microcalcification in PTMCs, while color Doppler flow imaging is unable to detect blood flow in the nodules due to their small size (12). Quantitative CEUS is a new technology whose application in the diagnosis of abdominal diseases is developed gradually (13). For example, the use of CEUS in superficial organs is currently being explored; however, its ability to identify PTMC nodules has not yet been widely investigated (14).

Tumor angiogenesis imaging has become increasingly popular. Power Doppler ultrasound (more sensitive than color Doppler) can detect blood flow in arterioles and venules (diameter, ~1mm; flow velocity, >10 mm/s); however, it can not detect new blood vessels at the microvessel level. Quantitative CEUS, however, overcomes this limitation and can detect microvessel blood flow velocity at 0.1–10 mm/s and observe microvessel perfusion in real-time at high frequency ultrasound, entering CEUS into the speciality of microvessel perfusion imaging (15).

In PTMC, the connective tissue between the epithelium of new blood vessels is not secure, and as a result cancerous vascular thyroid walls are thinner than the walls of a normal thyroid. This results in an incomplete basement membrane and a number of irregular blood vessels with varied thicknesses. This may be why the enhancement of PTCM following contrast medium administration was clearly different from that of normal thyroid parenchyma (16).

The present study observed that 127 nodules demonstrated early or simultaneous echo enhancement compared with the normal thyroid parenchyma, 125 presented inhomogeneous enhancement in dots or strips with an enhanced intensity lower than that of normal thyroid parenchymas, and 128 were inhomogeneously enhanced. In 17 nodules with a rich blood supply, the peak intensity was the same or slightly higher compared with that in the surrounding normal thyroid parenchyma. In addition, 3 nodules exhibited the same edge and periphery enhancement as in thyroid parenchyma, however the center of the nodules showed lower enhancement, and earlier time-to-peak and wash-out time. The pathology of these 3 nodules was concluded to be nodular goiter with papillary thyroid microcarcinoma, as the cancer tissue lay in the centre not in the periphery of the nodules. One nodule demonstrated the same enhancement intensity and arrival time as the surrounding normal thyroid parenchymas; however, this patient was diagnosed with PTMC and Hashimoto's thyroiditis. All cases presented in the current study demonstrate that contrast agents fade earlier in PTMC nodules than in normal thyroid tissue. Therefore, it is hypothesized that the enhancement characteristics of PTCM in CEUS include earlier or simultaneous enhancement, inhomogeneous and low-intensity internal enhancement and earlier wash-out time in comparison to the surrounding normal thyroid parenchyma.

The peak enhanced intensity inside the nodules of certain PTMC were found to be equal to or higher than that of the peripheral parenchyma. In several PTMC nodules, a lack of blood supply was observed as only dot-like or sporadic-like enhancement after SonoVue was administered; however, the evidence of enhancement and rapid wash-out time during the CEUS process was not easily apparent. This may be attributed to the small size of the nodules (diameter, ≤5 mm), which fail to form the tumor vascular beds and arteriovenous fistulas required to provide sufficient blood supply to the papillary thyroid carcinoma (17). However, the recording of enhancement may be influenced by the condition of the apparatus and the experience of the operator, as evidence of enhancement can be missed and be recorded as having no change in the nodule enhancement and wash-out times. Under a repeated and careful observation and analysis, an earlier wash-out time may be observed in PTMC nodules in comparison to normal thyroid parenchyma (18).

Color Doppler and 2D ultrasound may potentially form the foundation of PTMC diagnosis (19,20). However, as the majority of PTCM nodules have a reduced blood supply, CEUS is helpful in detecting and displaying microvessels, detecting low-speed blood flow and improving the sensitivity of diagnosis (21,22). Therefore, CEUS may be a novel and valuable diagnostic tool for the identification and diagnosis of PTCM.

In conclusion, PTMC enhancement washed out faster than in normal thyroid parenchyma. The PTMC characteristics of CEUS may improve the accuracy of diagnosis and provide valuable information for the treatment of the disease.

Acknowledgements

The present study was financially supported by grants from the SJTU Medicine Engineering Interdisciplinary Research Fund (no. YG2013MS53), the Shanghai Municipal Natural Science Foundation (no. 12ZR1422600), the National Nature Science Foundation of China (no. 81371574) and the Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of Chinam (no. 20120073120100).

References

1 

Colonna M, Uhry Z, Guizard AV, Delafosse P, Schvartz C, Belot A and Grosclaude P: FRANCIM network: Recent trends in incidence, geographical distribution, and survival of papillary thyroid cancer in France. Cancer Epidemiol. 39:511–518. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

2 

Roti E, de Gli Uberti EC, Bondanelli M and Braverman LE: Thyroid papillary microcarcinoma: A descriptive and meta-analysis study. Eur J Endocrinol. 159:659–673. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

3 

Hughes DT, Haymart MR, Miller BS, Gauger PG and Doherty GM: The most commonly occurring papillary thyroid cancer in the United States is now a microcarcinoma in a patient older than 45 years. Thyroid. 21:231–236. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

4 

Ito Y, Tomoda C, Uruno T, Takamura Y, Miya A, Kobayashi K, Matsuzuka F, Kuma K and Miyauchi A: Papillary microcarcinoma of the thyroid: How should it be treated? World J Surg. 28:1115–1121. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

5 

Pelizzo MR, Boschin IM, Toniato A, Piotto A, Bernante P, Pagetta C, Rampin L and Rubello D: Papillary thyroid microcarcinoma (PTMC): Prognostic factors, management and outcome in 403 patients. Eur J Surg Oncol. 32:1144–1148. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

6 

Smith-Bindman R, Lebda P, Feldstein VA, Sellami D, Goldstein RB, Brasic N, Jin C and Kornak J: Risk of thyroid cancer based on thyroid ultrasound imaging characteristicscs: Results of a population-based study. JAMA Intern Med. 173:1788–1796. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

7 

Pelizzo MR, Boschin IM, Toniato A, Pagetta C, Piotto A, Bernante P, Casara D, Pennelli G and Rubello D: Natural history, diagnosis, treatment and outcome of papillary thyroid microcarcinoma (PTMC): A mono-institutional 12-year experience. Nucl Med Commun. 25:547–552. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

8 

Pelizzo MR, Boschin IM, Toniato A, Pagetta C, Piotto A, Bernante P, Casara D, Pennelli G and Rubello D: Natural history, diagnosis, treatment and outcome of papillary thyroid microcarcinoma (PTMC): A mono-institutional 12-year experience. Nucl Med Commun. 25:547–552. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

9 

Cosgrove D: Microbubble enhancement of tumour neovascularity. Eur Radiol. 9(Suppl 3): S413–S414. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

10 

Mitchell JC and Parangi S: Angiogenesis in benign and malignant thyroid disease. Thyroid. 15:494–510. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

11 

Nemec U, Nemec SF, Novotny C, Weber M, Czerny C and Krestan CR: Quantitative evaluation of contrast-enhanced ultrasound after intravenous administration of a microbubble contrast agent for differentiation of benign and malignant thyroid nodules: Assessment of diagnostic accuracy. Eur Radiol. 22:1357–1365. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

12 

Agha A, Jung EM, Janke M, Hornung M, Georgieva M, Schlitt HJ, Schreyer AG, Strosczcynski C and Schleder S: Preoperative diagnosis of thyroid adenomas using high resolution contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS). Clin Hemorheol Microcirc. 55:403–409. 2013.PubMed/NCBI

13 

Seo YL, Yoon DY, Baek S, Ku YJ, Rho YS, Chung EJ and Koh SH: Detection of neck recurrence in patients with differentiated thyroid cancer: comparison of ultrasound, contrast-enhanced CT and (18)F-FDG PET/CT using surgical pathology as a reference standard: (ultrasound vs. CT vs. (18)F-FDG PET/CT in recurrent thyroid cancer). Eur Radiol. 22:2246–2254. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

14 

Molinari F, Mantovani A, Deandrea M, Limone P, Garberoglio R and Suri JS: Characterization of single thyroid nodules by contrast-enhanced 3-D ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol. 36:1616–1625. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

15 

Deng J, Zhou P, Tian SM, Zhang L, Li JL and Qian Y: Comparison of diagnostic efficacy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound, acoustic radiation force impulse imaging, and their combined use in differentiating focal solid thyroid nodules. PLoS One. 9:e906742014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

16 

Acharya UR, Sree Vinitha S, Krishnan MM, Molinari F, Garberoglio R and Suri JS: Non-invasive automated 3D thyroid lesion classification in ultrasound: A class of ThyroScan™ systems. Ultrasonics. 52:508–520. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

17 

Hornung M, Jung EM, Georgieva M, Schlitt HJ, Stroszczynski C and Agha A: Detection of microvascularization of thyroid carcinomas using linear high resolution contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS). Clin Hemorheol Microcirc. 52:197–203. 2012.PubMed/NCBI

18 

Cantisani V, Consorti F, Guerrisi A, Guerrisi I, Ricci P, Di Segni M, Mancuso E, Scardella L, Milazzo F, D'Ambrosio F and Antonaci A: Prospective comparative evaluation of quantitative-elastosonography (Q-elastography) and contrast-enhanced ultrasound for the evaluation of thyroid nodules: Preliminary experience. Eur J Radio. 182:1892–1898. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar

19 

Giusti M, Orlandi D, Melle G, Massa B, Silvestri E, Minuto F and Turtulici G: Is there a real diagnostic impact of elastosonography and contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in the management of thyroid nodules? J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 14:195–206. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

20 

Agha A, Hornung M, Rennert J, Uller W, Lighvani H, Schlitt HJ and Jung EM: Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography for localization of pathologic glands in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism. Surgery. 151:580–586. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

21 

Dietrich CF, Ignee A, Hocke M, Schreiber-Dietrich D and Greis C: Pitfalls and artefacts using contrast enhanced ultrasound. Z Gastroenterol. 49:350–356. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

22 

Friedrich-Rust M, Sperber A, Holzer K, Diener J, Grünwald F, Badenhoop K, Weber S, Kriener S, Herrmann E, Bechstein WO, Zeuzem S and Bojunga J: Real-time elastography and contrast-enhanced ultrasound for the assessment of thyroid nodules. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes. 118:602–609. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Related Articles

Journal Cover

May-2016
Volume 11 Issue 5

Print ISSN: 1792-0981
Online ISSN:1792-1015

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Chen HY, Liu WY, Zhu H, Jiang DW, Wang DH, Chen Y, Li W and Pan G: Diagnostic value of contrast‑enhanced ultrasound in papillary thyroid microcarcinoma. Exp Ther Med 11: 1555-1562, 2016
APA
Chen, H.Y., Liu, W.Y., Zhu, H., Jiang, D.W., Wang, D.H., Chen, Y. ... Pan, G. (2016). Diagnostic value of contrast‑enhanced ultrasound in papillary thyroid microcarcinoma. Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine, 11, 1555-1562. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2016.3094
MLA
Chen, H. Y., Liu, W. Y., Zhu, H., Jiang, D. W., Wang, D. H., Chen, Y., Li, W., Pan, G."Diagnostic value of contrast‑enhanced ultrasound in papillary thyroid microcarcinoma". Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine 11.5 (2016): 1555-1562.
Chicago
Chen, H. Y., Liu, W. Y., Zhu, H., Jiang, D. W., Wang, D. H., Chen, Y., Li, W., Pan, G."Diagnostic value of contrast‑enhanced ultrasound in papillary thyroid microcarcinoma". Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine 11, no. 5 (2016): 1555-1562. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2016.3094