Continuous‑type splenogonadal fusion: A case report
- Authors:
- Guizhen Huang
- Yidong Huang
- Li Zeng
- Miao Yuan
- Yang Wu
- Lugang Huang
View Affiliations
Affiliations: Department of Pediatric Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian 361000, P.R. China, Department of Pediatric Surgery, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610041, P.R. China
- Published online on: March 8, 2017 https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2017.4198
-
Pages:
2019-2021
Metrics: Total
Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Metrics: Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
This article is mentioned in:
Abstract
Splenogonadal fusion (SGF) is a rare congenital malformation. Since it lacks characteristic features, very few cases of SGF have been diagnosed preoperatively. Laparoscopy was effective in both diagnosing and surgically treating this condition. Herein, we reported left side SGF in a male patient who was diagnosed during laparoscopic exploration, and Fowler‑Stephens orchidopexy was implemented at the same time. The patient was followed up for one year. At a 6‑month follow‑up, the left scrotum demonstrated swelling and the internal contents were hard. An ultrasound of this testicle indicated non‑uniform, splenic‑like organization. However, at the one‑year follow‑up, the volume of splenic‑like organization was reduced but the testicular size did not exhibit further atrophy.
View References
1
|
Jayasundara JA, Vithana VH and Lamahewage
AK: A case of continuous-type splenogonadal fusion. Singapore Med
J. 54:e123–e124. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
2
|
Lopes RI, de Medeiros MT, Arap MA, Cocuzza
M, Srougi M and Hallak J: Splenogonadal fusion and testicular
cancer: Case report and review of the literature. Einstein (Sao
Paulo). 10:92–95. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
3
|
Karaman MI and Gonzales ET Jr:
Splenogonadal fusion: Report of 2 cases and review of the
literature. J Urol. 155:309–311. 1996. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
4
|
Sountoulides P, Neri F, Bellocci R, Schips
L and Cindolo L: Splenogonadal fusion mimicking a testis tumor. J
Postgrad Med. 60:202–204. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
5
|
Carragher AM: One hundred years of
splenogonadal fusion. Urology. 35:471–475. 1990. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
6
|
Varma DR, Sirineni GR, Rao MV, Pottala KM
and Mallipudi BV: Sonographic and CT features of splenogonadal
fusion. Pediatr Radiol. 37:916–919. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
7
|
Putschar WG and Manion WC: Splenicgonadal
fusion. Am J Pathol. 32:15–33. 1956.PubMed/NCBI
|
8
|
Bosnalı O, Cici İ, Moralıoğlu S and
Cerrah-Celayir A: Continuous-typ esplenogonadal fusion: Report of a
rare case. Turk J Pediatr. 56:680–683. 2014.PubMed/NCBI
|
9
|
Keyik B, Yanik B, Conkbayir I, Tuygun C,
Kizilgoz V and Hekimoğlu B: Continuous-type splenogonadal fusion
associated with an ipsilateral testicular atrophy: Sonographic
findings. J Clin Ultrasound. 38:161–163. 2010.PubMed/NCBI
|
10
|
Le Roux PJ and Heddle RM: Splenogonadal
fusion: Is the accepted classification system accurate? BJU Int.
85:114–115. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
11
|
Chiaramonte C, Siracusa F and Li Voti G:
Splenogonadal fusion: A genetic disorder?-report of a case and
review of the literature. Urol Case Rep. 2:67–69. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
12
|
Hines JR and Eggum PR: Splenic-gonadal
fusion causing bowel obstruction. Arch Surg. 83:887–889. 1961.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
13
|
Croxford WC, Pfistermuller KL, Scott F and
Pope AJ: Splenogonadal fusion presenting clinically and
radiologically as a seminoma. Urol Case Rep. 3:204–205. 2015.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|