Evaluation of the safety of MRI scans in patients undergoing dual-chamber pacemaker implantation

Introduction

Permanent pacemaker implantation has become an important treatment for a variety of organic arrhythmias, but about 50–75% of patients are required to receive nuclear magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans after implantation (1). MRI does not involve radiation and has multi-directional imaging as well as excellent contrast resolution of soft tissues, so it can provide relatively more comprehensive information about tissue perfusion, function and metabolism. Besides, it can also clearly show the heart, blood vessels and body cavity without contrast agents, and its cardiac function evaluation also has a higher application value (2). Components and materials of conventional cardiac pacemakers contain ferromagnetic substance, so under the action of high field strength of static fields, the pulse generator and pacing electrodes can be turned or shifted (3); radio frequency fields interfere with magnetic components to partly or fully disable them in ways such as closing reeds, changing the frequency of pacemakers, resetting programs or inhibiting pace-making (4). Thermal energy generated at the junction of the top of electrodes and myocardial tissues injures the myocardia, thus contributing to the formation of scars or perforations, and it also affects the perception and program-controlled functions of the device, thus inducing arrhythmia (5). On the area around 15 cm of the pulse generator, there appear heavy artifacts (6). In 2008, the first EnRhythm MRI SureScan IPG pacemaker and CapSureFix MRI pacing electrode (Type: 5086MRI) of Medtronic were approved by the European Conformity (CE) and U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and clinical safety studies have been conducted (7,8). Up to now, the largest sample study was conducted for 723 patients from 66 heart centers in the United States. About 13% of patients were followed up for 1 year and received MRI scans for neurological diseases (33%), spinal diseases (16%), cancers (11%), joint injuries (11%) and other causes (29%), and 47% of patients did not receive MRI and CT scans before pacemaker implantation. There appeared no serious symptoms and pacemaker dysfunctions in any of the patients (9). The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety of MRI scans in pacemaker implantation and present precautions.

Patients and methods

Patient information

A total of 86 patients undergoing this pacemaker implantation who were admitted to Huanggang Hospital (Huanggang, China) from June 2006 to March 2017 were continuously selected. Among them, there were 45 males and 41 females aged from 45 to 78 years with the mean age of 56.5±14.3 years. The duration of operation was 46–82 min with the mean value of 65.3±19.8 min. The basic types of cardiovascular diseases: Severe slow rhythm (49 cases), persistent atrial fibrillation after radiofrequency ablation (12 cases), severe ventricular rhythm (15 cases) and severe coronary heart disease or heart failure with arrhythmia (10 cases). There were 35 cases of pacemaker-dependent type and 51 cases of pacemaker-independent type. Pacing modes: AAI (A, atrial paced; A, atrial sensed; I, pacing is inhibited if beat is sensed) (38 cases), VVI (V, ventricle paced; V, ventricle sensed; I, pacing is inhibited if beat is sensed) (25 cases) and DDR (D, both atrial and ventricle paced; D, both atrial and ventricle sensed; R, rate responsive) (23 cases); there were 26 cases accompanied with hypertension, 12 cases with diabetes and 20 cases with stroke; and there were 30 cases who had received MRI scans before the pacemaker implantation and 56 cases with no such history. Education duration was 9–15 years with the average value of 11.2±3.5 years. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Ezhou Central Hospital (Hubei, China) and patients signed written informed consents.

Study methods

The study was completed by the same team for MRI scans and nursing. They informed patients risks in scans and signed safety questionnaires. The whole process was accompanied by specialist physicians. Before scans, the pacemaker was adjusted to the MRI-compatible mode [AOO (A, atrial paced; O, none sensed; O, none-rate responsive), VOO (V, ventricle paced; O, none sensed; O, none-rate responsive), DOO (D, both atrial and ventricle paced; O, none sensed; O, none-rate responsive) and OFF] with the pacing threshold ≤2.0 V/0.4 m/sec. The low resistance value was 200–1,500 Ω and the high resistance value was 30–100 Ω. First aid equipment and drugs were prepared. The low field strength was (<1.5T), and the gradient switching rate was ≤200 T/m/sec. Synchronized electrocardiogram (ECG) monitoring was conducted. Body radiation absorption rate was ≤2.0 W/kg; the radiation rate of the head was ≤3.2 W/kg; the duration of scan in pacemaker implantation for the first time was ≥6 weeks. The type of the MRI scanner was Siemens Sonata superconductive 1.5T, and we selected different scan sequences according to different inspection sites.

Observation indexes

Follow-up duration was 2–80 months with the mean value of 40.5±15.6 months. Mean time of first MRI scan, scan times and mean scan duration after pacemaker implantation were recorded. Causes were examined, and according to all the symptoms and abnormalities of pacemakers appearing in patients after the examination, patients were divided into the discomfort group and the normal group, and possible causes of discomfort were analyzed.

Statistical analysis

SPSS 20.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) was used for statistical analysis. Measurement data were represented as mean ± standard deviation. Risk factors affecting MRI scans were analyzed by multivariate logistic regression analysis and screened by using progressive retraction method. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.

Results

Mean time of the first MRI scan, scan times and mean scan duration

After implantation (2–15 months), the first MRI scan was conducted with the mean time of 6.8±2.3 months; scan times was 1–5 times with the average value of 2.2±0.9 times; scan duration was 35–68 min with the average value of 45.6±12.3 min.

Causes

The main causes include neurological diseases (such as stroke, neurodegenerative diseases, spinal cord lesions and craniocerebral trauma), spinal diseases (such as disc herniation and traumatic fracture), cancers (such as bone tumors, brain tumors and breast tumors), joint injuries (such as femoral head necrosis, knee cruciate ligament injury and hip dislocation) and visceral system scans (hepatobiliary pancreas, prostate, ovary and uterus) (Fig. 1).

Figure 1. Analysis of causes of receiving MRI scans.

Discomfort symptoms and pacemaker abnormalities

There appeared discomfort symptoms in 12 patients among 86 patients, such as excessive anxiety, significantly higher blood pressure (10% higher than the base value), significantly faster heart rate (10% faster than the base value); there appeared pacemaker abnormalities in a total of 10 patients, such as increased impedance (20% greater than the base value), abnormalities in perception or pacemakers (appeared pace-making and self-rhythm), disorders in perception or pacemakers (severe heart rate overrun or arrest), hypotension or blackness, no syncope and disturbance of consciousness. Safe scans could be achieved by psychological counseling, debugging pacemaker parameters, changing MRI scan sequences and other methods without pacemaker or wire shifting or other changes.

Risk factors affecting MRI scans

Data such as patient baseline data as well as MRI scan and pacemaker para-meters were included in the multivariate logistic regression analysis model. As independent variables, appearances of discomfort symptoms and pacemaker abnormalities were selected as dependent variables for screening. The final results showed that the basic types of cardiovascular diseases, dependence on pacemakers, duration of education, pacemaker threshold, impedance and MRI scan time were correlated with the occurrence of adverse outcomes (p<0.05) (Table I).

Table I. Analysis of risk factors affecting MRI scans.

Table I.

Analysis of risk factors affecting MRI scans.

Factors	β	Wald	P-value	OR	95% CI
Basic types of cardiovascular diseases	0.123	5.236	0.018	1.625	1.128–2.659
Dependence on pacemakers	0.285	4.625	0.029	1.147	1.007–3.065
Duration of education	−0.547	4.121	0.033	0.522	0.147–0.863
Pacemaker threshold	0.352	4.554	0.031	1.085	1.021–2.659
Impedance	0.427	4.329	0.035	1.072	1.011–2.954
MRI scan time	0.441	4.859	0.025	1.326	1.124–2.836

Discussion

The pacemaker has small volume, light weight and high magnetization resistance, good magnetic field stability and other advantages (10). Replacing pacemaker switches with Hall sensors increased magnetic field stability; replacing traditional ferromagnetic wires with steel fiber wires reduced wire impedance; shield protection for internal power supply circuits reduced the content of pacemaker ferromagnetic materials; the mode exclusive for MRI was started during the scan, and resumed after the scan. Under the high field strength (3T and 8T) and high specific absorption rate (SAR) (3.90 W/kg), the scan was performed for a long time (210 min), and the results showed that the image quality was not reduced and there appeared no obvious discomfort in patients and no obvious dysfunction in the pacemaker (11).

The study included relatively more subjects, so the basic types of cardiovascular diseases were complex, including pacemaker-dependent and pacemaker-independent types and pacing modes were different. Duration of the first MRI scan was 2–15 months, and the perception, pacing function and electrode impedance of the pacemaker tended to reach a steady state for 1 to 2 weeks after operation, which needed to be programmed to be adjusted to the optimal state (12). Sequences needed to be scanned were different for different parts undergoing MRI scans, thus posing different levels of influence on the pacemaker working state, which has not yet been specifically analyzed. A total of 12 cases (14.0%) showed significant discomfort symptoms, 10 cases (11.6%) showed pacemaker abnormalities, and the incidence rate was 25.6%. The study distinguished between patient discomfort and pacemaker abnormality, and the results showed that patient discomfort was often associated with poor communication and great psychological fluctuation, while pacemaker abnormality was more likely to be associated with MRI interference (13). For patients with neurological disorders, tumors, and osteoarthritis, it was advisable to select an MRI-compatible pacemaker, and for those who did not need MRI scan for the time being, using MRI-compatible pacing electrodes in patients in advance could retain the right to receive MRI scans in the future (8). Data and results of present studies are still limited to the scan under the 1.5T or less field strength, and there still exists no large sample data about that under 3.0T field strength (14). Therefore, clinical selection of intended population still needs to be cautious.

Through screening, the study further showed that the basic types of cardiovascular diseases, dependence on pacemakers, duration of education, pacing threshold, impedance and MRI scan time were related to the occurrence of adverse outcomes. Patients with severe ventricular arrhythmia (15 cases) and severe coronary heart disease or heart failure with arrhythmia were more likely to be examined with adverse events after postoperative radiofrequency ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation among patients with the basic types of cardiovascular diseases. Possible causes might be poor cardiac rhythm and dependence on pacemaker (15,16). Patients dependent on pacemakers tended to have high pacing thresholds and relatively higher impedance (17). The longer the duration of education was, the more clearly the pacemaker maintenance and MRI scan precautions would be, which could reduce the incidence rate of adverse events. And the longer the duration of MRI scans was, the higher the probability of resulted uncontrollable pacing abnormalities would be (18,19). This study provided an important reference for guiding clinical MRI and pre-scan preparation.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

No funding was received.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the present study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Authors' contributions

MX, NZ and BF conceived and designed the study. MX, YQ and PM were responsible for the collection and analysis of the patient data. NZ, HP and YZ interpreted the data and drafted the manuscript. BF revised the manuscript critically for important intellectual content. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Ezhou Central Hospital (Hubei, China) and patients signed written informed consents.

Patient consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References