Spandidos Publications Logo
  • About
    • About Spandidos
    • Aims and Scopes
    • Abstracting and Indexing
    • Editorial Policies
    • Reprints and Permissions
    • Job Opportunities
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Contact
  • Journals
    • All Journals
    • Oncology Letters
      • Oncology Letters
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • International Journal of Oncology
      • International Journal of Oncology
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Molecular and Clinical Oncology
      • Molecular and Clinical Oncology
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine
      • Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • International Journal of Molecular Medicine
      • International Journal of Molecular Medicine
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Biomedical Reports
      • Biomedical Reports
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Oncology Reports
      • Oncology Reports
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Molecular Medicine Reports
      • Molecular Medicine Reports
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • World Academy of Sciences Journal
      • World Academy of Sciences Journal
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • International Journal of Functional Nutrition
      • International Journal of Functional Nutrition
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • International Journal of Epigenetics
      • International Journal of Epigenetics
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Medicine International
      • Medicine International
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
  • Articles
  • Information
    • Information for Authors
    • Information for Reviewers
    • Information for Librarians
    • Information for Advertisers
    • Conferences
  • Language Editing
Spandidos Publications Logo
  • About
    • About Spandidos
    • Aims and Scopes
    • Abstracting and Indexing
    • Editorial Policies
    • Reprints and Permissions
    • Job Opportunities
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Contact
  • Journals
    • All Journals
    • Biomedical Reports
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • International Journal of Epigenetics
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • International Journal of Functional Nutrition
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • International Journal of Molecular Medicine
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • International Journal of Oncology
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Medicine International
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Molecular and Clinical Oncology
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Molecular Medicine Reports
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Oncology Letters
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Oncology Reports
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • World Academy of Sciences Journal
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
  • Articles
  • Information
    • For Authors
    • For Reviewers
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Conferences
  • Language Editing
Login Register Submit
  • This site uses cookies
  • You can change your cookie settings at any time by following the instructions in our Cookie Policy. To find out more, you may read our Privacy Policy.

    I agree
Search articles by DOI, keyword, author or affiliation
Search
Advanced Search
presentation
Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine
Join Editorial Board Propose a Special Issue
Print ISSN: 1792-0981 Online ISSN: 1792-1015
Journal Cover
December-2018 Volume 16 Issue 6

Full Size Image

Sign up for eToc alerts
Recommend to Library

Journals

International Journal of Molecular Medicine

International Journal of Molecular Medicine

International Journal of Molecular Medicine is an international journal devoted to molecular mechanisms of human disease.

International Journal of Oncology

International Journal of Oncology

International Journal of Oncology is an international journal devoted to oncology research and cancer treatment.

Molecular Medicine Reports

Molecular Medicine Reports

Covers molecular medicine topics such as pharmacology, pathology, genetics, neuroscience, infectious diseases, molecular cardiology, and molecular surgery.

Oncology Reports

Oncology Reports

Oncology Reports is an international journal devoted to fundamental and applied research in Oncology.

Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine

Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine

Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine is an international journal devoted to laboratory and clinical medicine.

Oncology Letters

Oncology Letters

Oncology Letters is an international journal devoted to Experimental and Clinical Oncology.

Biomedical Reports

Biomedical Reports

Explores a wide range of biological and medical fields, including pharmacology, genetics, microbiology, neuroscience, and molecular cardiology.

Molecular and Clinical Oncology

Molecular and Clinical Oncology

International journal addressing all aspects of oncology research, from tumorigenesis and oncogenes to chemotherapy and metastasis.

World Academy of Sciences Journal

World Academy of Sciences Journal

Multidisciplinary open-access journal spanning biochemistry, genetics, neuroscience, environmental health, and synthetic biology.

International Journal of Functional Nutrition

International Journal of Functional Nutrition

Open-access journal combining biochemistry, pharmacology, immunology, and genetics to advance health through functional nutrition.

International Journal of Epigenetics

International Journal of Epigenetics

Publishes open-access research on using epigenetics to advance understanding and treatment of human disease.

Medicine International

Medicine International

An International Open Access Journal Devoted to General Medicine.

Journal Cover
December-2018 Volume 16 Issue 6

Full Size Image

Sign up for eToc alerts
Recommend to Library

  • Article
  • Citations
    • Cite This Article
    • Download Citation
    • Create Citation Alert
    • Remove Citation Alert
    • Cited By
  • Similar Articles
    • Related Articles (in Spandidos Publications)
    • Similar Articles (Google Scholar)
    • Similar Articles (PubMed)
  • Download PDF
  • Download XML
  • View XML
Article Open Access

Efficacy of several biological therapies for treating moderate to severe psoriasis: A network meta‑analysis

  • Authors:
    • Wenjun Geng
    • Jianhua Zhao
    • Jixing Fu
    • Huamin Zhang
    • Shaohua Qiao
  • View Affiliations / Copyright

    Affiliations: Department of Dermatology, The Second Hospital of Liaocheng, Linqing, Shandong 252601, P.R. China
    Copyright: © Geng et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License.
  • Pages: 5085-5095
    |
    Published online on: October 15, 2018
       https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2018.6859
  • Expand metrics +
Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Metrics: Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Cited By (CrossRef): 0 citations Loading Articles...

This article is mentioned in:



Abstract

The aim of the present meta‑analysis was to systematically assess the efficacy of the various treatments available for moderate to severe psoriasis. PubMed and Embase databases were systematically searched to select relevant studies up to February 2015. Odds ratios (ORs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used as effect estimates. In addition, the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 50, PASI 75 and PASI 90 responses for the therapies were systematically assessed. A total of 33 randomized controlled trials were included in the present study. For the PASI 75 response rate, infliximab (5 mg) may be the most effective option for the treatment of moderate to severe psoriasis. Furthermore, the pooled results of the PASI 50 response rate demonstrated that infliximab (5 mg) and ustekinumab (90 mg) may be superior to other drugs for treating moderate to severe psoriasis. For the PASI 90 response rate, infliximab (5 mg), ustekinumab (90 mg) and briakinumab (weeks 0 and 4, 200 mg; week 8, 100 mg) exhibited improved results compared with other treatments. In conclusion, infliximab (5 mg) may be a superior option to treat moderate to severe psoriasis due to the relatively high PASI scores. However, despite the high PASI 90 responses, further studies are required to identify the efficacy of ustekinumab (90 mg) and briakinumab.

Introduction

Psoriasis is a common immune-mediated skin disease. The prevalence of psoriasis in adults ranges between 0.91 and 8.5% worldwide and the incidence of psoriasis is higher in adults than in children (1). Psoriasis is characterized by symptoms of plaque, pustular and other skin lesions. Chronic plaque psoriasis accounts for 90% of all psoriasis cases (2,3).

A number of biological therapies are used to treat moderate to severe psoriasis, including etanercept, briakinumab, ustekinumab, adalimumab and infliximab (4–8). Etanercept, adalimumab and infliximab are monoclonal antibodies against tumor necrosis factor (TNF), which function by neutralizing the biological activity of TNF for treating the TNF-mediated inflammation (5,9). By contrast, ustekinumab and briakinumab are human monoclonal antibodies against interleukin (IL)-12/23p40 (8). These biological therapies are used to treat psoriasis and improved clinical outcomes have been observed. However, the efficacy of these therapies has been not systematically reviewed.

In the present study, a network meta-analysis was performed to review and compare the efficacy of these aforementioned biological therapies of psoriasis. The Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) response (10) was used as an indicator for assessing the effect of treatment on the severity of psoriasis. PASI 50, PASI 75 and PASI 90 responses for the therapies were systematically assessed. The pooled results provide further information on selecting the most suitable treatments for moderate to severe psoriasis.

Materials and methods

Data sources

The PubMed (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed) and Embase (www.elsevier.com/solutions/embase-biomedical-research) databases were systematically searched in order to select relevant studies up to February 2015. The search terms included the following: Psoriasis, methotrexate (MTX), cyclosporin A (CSA), ustekinumab, etanercept, infliximab, briakinumab and adalimumab.

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Studies with the following characteristics were included in the current meta-analysis: i) Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reporting the treatment of moderate to severe psoriasis with the aforementioned drugs. Moderate to severe psoriasis is defined as body surface area >10 or psoriasis area and severity index >10 and dermatology life quality index >10 (11); ii) studies including the adults as participants; and iii) studies reporting the PASI response rate (50, 75 and 90%). Any reviews, case reports and letters were excluded from the meta-analysis. Any studies investigating patients with mild psoriasis and those written in a language other than English were also excluded.

Data extraction and quality assessment

Two reviewers independently extracted the following data: The name of the first author, publication year, sample size, intervention, demographic characteristics of the included patients and PASI response rate. The controversies were discussed with a third reviewer to reach consensus. The methodological quality of the included studies was evaluated by the Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias Tool (12).

Statistical analysis

All analyses were performed using the ADDIS software version 1.16.5 (Drug Information and Monitoring Systems, Groningen, The Netherlands). Odds ratios (ORs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled. The network analysis performed was based on the Bayesian framework. Data were evaluated by Markov chain Monte Carlo methods and all analyses were performed using the random effects model. The consistency of the RCTs was assessed by Node-splitting analysis, and the consistency model was used if P>0.05. Otherwise, the inconsistency model was used to pool the odd ratios (13).

Results

Study selection

As presented in Fig. 1, a total of 897 studies were identified from PubMed and 917 studies from Embase by the initial search. Subsequent to excluding any duplicates, 1,113 studies remained. A total of 831 irrelevant studies were excluded by reviewing the titles and abstracts. In addition, 249 studies that did not meet the inclusion criteria were excluded. Finally, 33 RCTs were included in the present study (4–9,14–40).

Figure 1.

Process of the literature selection performed in the present meta-analysis. RCT, randomized controlled trial.

Characteristics of the included studies

As presented in Table I, the demographic characteristics, including age, sex and weight of the patients in the included studies were similar. Included RCTs were published between 1994 and 2015. The mean duration of psoriasis of the included patients ranged between 11.1 and 21.5 years. Quality assessment demonstrated that the quality of the included RCTs was relatively high. With respect to random sequence generation (selection bias), a number of studies were assessed as having an unclear risk of bias. With regards to blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias), blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) and incomplete outcome data (attrition bias), a small proportion of studies were assessed as having high risk of bias (Fig. 2) and were excluded from the current study. However, the studies by Laburte et al (25) and Cassano et al (15) were not excluded as they met with the inclusion criteria despite having quite a poor rating.

Figure 2.

Risk of bias of the included studies. +, low risk of bias; ?, unclear risk of bias; -, high risk of bias. The quality evaluation map indicates that, regarding random sequence generation (selection bias) and allocation concealment (selection bias), many references have an unclear risk of bias and few references have high risk of bias. However, regarding incomplete outcome data (attrition bias), blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) and blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias), ~10% references have high risk of bias and 10% references have an unclear risk of bias. The included references showed no evidence of selective reporting (reporting bias) in the included references-all references showed a low risk of bias.

Table I.

Characteristics of the included studies.

Table I.

Characteristics of the included studies.

First authorYearFollow-upTreatmentNAge (years)M/FWeight (kg)Duration of psoriasis (years)PASI scorePASI 75PASI 50PASI 90(Refs.)
Laburte et al19940.2–18.3CSA 5 mg132   40.7±12.390/4272.9±3.417.7±11.125.1±8.0117NANA(25)
monthsCSA 2.5 mg119   42.0±12.686/33   77.4±15.518.4±11.124.9±7.0  57NANA
Gordon et al200660 weeksAdalimumab  4546 (20–71)32/1393 (63–159)21 (1.3–57.9)16.7 (5.4–39.0)  24NANA(17)
Placebo  5243 (20–70)34/1894(50–147)19 (1.0–39.9)16.0(5.5–40.4)  2NANA
Menter et al200816 weeksAdalimumab814   44.1±13.2546/268   92.3±23.0   18.1±11.91   19.0±7.08578NA366   (2)
Placebo398   45.4±13.4257/141   94.1±23.0   18.4±11.94   18.8±7.09  28NA  8
Asahina et al201024 weeksAdalimumab  38   47.8±12.8132/6   69.7±15.4814.2±9.2925.44±8.98  2431  15   (5)
Placebo  46   43.9±10.7541/5   71.3±15.2815.5±8.8329.10±11.77  2  9  0
Revicki et al200816 weeksAdalimumab108   42.8±12.337/71NA17.6±10.020.1±7.4  8695  55(34)
MTX110   41.9±11.936/74NA19.0±10.319.5±7.4  6668  15
Placebo  53   40.7±11.418/35NA18.9±8.719.2±6.9  1016  6
Leonardi et al200312 weeksEtanercept 50 mg BIW16444.8±0.8107/57NA18.6±0.918.4±0.7  81121  36(27)
Etanercept 25 mg BIW16245.4±1.0109/53NA18.5±0.918.5±0.7  5594  19
Etanercept 25 mg QW16044.4±0.9118/42NA19.3±0.918.2±0.7  2365  5
Placebo16645.6±1.0105/61NA18.4±0.918.3±0.6  624  1
Papp et al200512 weeksEtanercept 50 mg BIW19444.5 (21.0–80.0)130/64NA18.1 (0.8–60.5)16.1 (7.0–57.3)  9615040(32)
Etanercept 25 mg BIW19646.0 (20.0–87.0)128/68NA21.5 (0.8–64.6)16.9 (4.0–51.2)  6712621
Placebo19344.0 (18.0–80.0)124/69NA17.5 (1.4–51.2)16.0 (7.0–62.4)  618  1
Tyring et al200612 weeksEtanercept 50 mg BIW31145.8±12.8203/108NA20.1±12.318.3±7.6146230  65(37)
Placebo307   45.6±12.1216/91NA19.7±11.418.1±7.4  1543  3
van de Kerkhof et al200812 weeksEtanercept 25 mg BIW  96   45.9±12.859/36   83.4±16.019.3±11.321.4±9.3  3666  13(38)
Placebo  46   43.6±12.625/21   79.1±20.217.3±8.221.0±8.7  1  4  1
Cassano et al201012 weeksEtanercept 50 mg BIW  36NANANANANA  1933NA(40)
Etanercept 100 mg QW  36NANANANANA  1327NA
Strober et al201112 weeksEtanercept 50 mg BIW139   45.2±14.885/54   96.9±24.915.2±12.118.5±6.055NA19(8)
Briakinumab139   44.9±12.993/46   96.1±24.516.3±12.019.4±7.9112NA77
Placebo72   45.0±13.946/26   92.9±25.215.5±11.718.3±6.45NA3
Gottlieb et al201112 weeksEtanercept 50 mg BIW141   43.1±12.598/43   94.5±20.417.0±12.719.4±8.078NA32(19)
Briakinumab138   43.6±14.389/49   93.2±22.916.1±12.518.4±7.2113NA81
Placebo68   44.0±13.647/21   96.5±27.219.1±13.218.5±6.95NA1
Bagel et al201212 weeksEtanercept 50 mg BIW6239 (18.0–71.0)29/3330.2 (18.2–44.2)17.5 (1–45)15.5 (8–46)375316(8)
Placebo6242 (18.0–70.0)26/3630.2 (18.2–44.2)11.9 (1–49)15.2 (10–41)341
Gottlieb et al200310 weeksInfliximab 5 mg9944 (34, 53)73/26NA16 (10, 25)20 (14, 28)879647(20)
Infliximab 3 mg9945 (37, 55)70/29NA18 (12, 24)20 (15, 26)718345
Placebo5145 (30, 52)31/20NA16 (6, 22)18 (15, 27)3111
Reich et al200524 weeksInfliximab 5 mg301   42.6±11.7207/94NA19.1±11.022.9±9.3227248161(33)
Placebo77   43.8±12.661/16NA17.3±11.122.8±8.7361
Menter et al200714 weeksInfliximab 5 mg314   44.5±13.0204/110   92.2±23.219.1±11.720.4±7.5193252113(29)
Infliximab 3 mg313   43.4±12.6206/107   92.0±22.518.1±11.820.1±7.914921375
Torii and Nakagawa201014 weeksInfliximab 5 mg35   46.9±13.022/13   68.5±13.414.2±8.9   31.9±12.8252917(35)
Placebo19   43.3±12.314/569.7±8.911.1±6.5   33.1±15.6221
Yang et al201210 weeksInfliximab 5 mg8439.4±12.360/2468.2±9.2   16.0±10.8NA687948(39)
Placebo4540.1±11.135/1067.4±9.916.0±8.9NA160
Barker et al201126 weeksInfliximab 5 mg653  44.1 (±18–78)438/21584.5±18.6   18.8±11.621.4±8.0502529333(14)
MTX215  41.9 (±18–69)148/6783.8±18.2   17.0±10.321.1±7.66610332
Leonardi et al200812 weeksUstekinumab 90 mg25646.2±11.3173/8393.8±23.9   19.6±11.119.7±7.617022094(26)
Ustekinumab 45 mg25544.8±12.5175/8093.7±23.8   19.7±11.720.5±8.6171213106
Placebo25544.8±11.3183/7294.2±23.5   20.4±11.720.4±8.68265
Papp et al200812 weeksUstekinumab 90 mg41146.6±12.1274/13791.5±21.3   20.3±12.320.1±7.5311367209(31)
Ustekinumab 45 mg40945.1±12.1283/12690.3±21.0   19.3±11.719.4±6.8273342173
Placebo41047.0±12.5283/12791.1±21.620.8±12.219.4±7.515413
Griffiths201036 weeksUstekinumab 90 mg247NANANANANA183NA111(21)
Ustekinumab 45 mg209NANANANANA142NA75
Etanercept 50 mg BIW347NANANANANA198NA80
Tsai et al201112 weeksUstekinumab 45 mg6140.9±12.750/1173.1±12.711.9±7.5   25.2±11.9415130(36)
Placebo6040.4±10.153/774.6±13.013.9±7.322.9±8.6381
Igarashi et al201212 weeksUstekinumab 45 mg64M: 45.053/1173.2±15.415.8±8.2   30.1±12.9385321(24)
Ustekinumab 90 mg62M: 44.047/1571.1±14.0   17.3±10.7   28.7±11.2425227
Placebo32M: 49.026/6   71.2±10.9   16.0±11.2   30.3±11.8241
Heydendael et al200317–52 weeksCSA 2.5 mg4241.6±13.029/13NANA14.0±6.630NANA(22)
MTX4338.3±12.428/15NANA13.4±3.626NANA
Flytstrom et al2008 CSA 5 mg3145 (18–70)27/487 (61–130)NA15.5±6.318279(16)
MTX3748 (23–78)28/985 (56–132)NA14.1±7.022244
Ho et al20106 monthsMTX2038.45 (21–68)18/2NANANA13NA0(23)
Placebo2043.45 (27–61)18/2NANANA16NA5
Gottlieb et al200324 weeksEtanercept 25 mg BIW5748.2 (25–72)33/24Mean: 91.823±1.617.8±1.117406(20)
Placebo5546.5 (18–77)37/18Mean: 90.720±1.719.5±1.3160
Cassano et al200612 weeksEtanercept 50 mg BIW5342.3 (18–73)57/52NANA8.7 (5.4–11.6)2939NA(15)
Etanercept 100 mg QW55 NANA 2843NA
Sterry et al201012 weeksEtanercept 50 mg BIW37946±11243/136NA   19±12   20±11208NANA(7)
Etanercept 50 mg QW37347±11230/143NA   19±11   19±10134NANA
Antoni et al200516 weeksInfliximab 5 mg5245.7±11.130/22NA   19.4±11.6   5.1±5.935NANA(4)
Placebo5245.2±9.730/22NA   16.9±10.9   4.2±5.80NANA
McInnes et al201312 weeksUstekinumab 45 mg20548.0 (39.0–55.0)106/99NA12.0 (4.1–22.2)7.1 (3.3–15.3)83NANA(28)
Ustekinumab 90 mg20447.0 (38.5–54.0)116/88NA14.1 (5.4–22.4)8.4 (4.8–14.7)93NANA
Placebo20648.0 (39.0–57.0)108/98NA13.1 (5.3–23.5)8.8 (4.4–14.3)16NANA
Griffiths et al201512 weeksEtanercept 50 mg QW37146.9±11.4229NA   18.6±11.419.0±9.8148NANA(6)
Etanercept 50 mg BIW37746.1±11.4241NA   19.2±11.919.8±10.7226NANA

[i] Data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation, or as the median (range). PASI, Psoriasis Area and Severity Index; MTX, methotrexate; CSA, cyclosporin A; BIW, twice weekly; QW, once weekly; M/F, male/female; NA, not available; Ref, study reference number; M, mean value.

Network meta-analysis

Based on the results of node-splitting analysis (Table II), the effect sizes were pooled using an inconsistency model. Regarding the PASI 75 response rate, infliximab (5 mg) was the most effective option for the treatment of moderate to severe psoriasis (Table III and Fig. 3). The pooled results of the PASI 50 response rate demonstrated that infliximab (5 mg) and ustekinumab (90 mg) may be superior to other drugs for treating moderate to severe psoriasis (Table IV). In addition, regarding the PASI 90 response rate, treatment with infliximab (5 mg), ustekinumab (90 mg) and briakinumab (weeks 0 and 4, 200 mg; week 8, 100 mg) indicated improved results compared with other agents (Table V). Finally, the drugs can be ranked in the following order according to their efficacy, defined as their PASI 90 response rate: Briakinumab > ustekinumab (90 mg) > infliximab (5 mg)> ustekinumab (45 mg) > adalimumab > infliximab (3 mg)> etanercept (50 mg BIW) > CSA (5 mg) > etanercept (25 mg BIW) > MTX > etanercept (25 mg QW) > placebo (Table VI). The odds ratio value of infliximab (5 mg) compared with the other drugs was >1, therefore, infliximab (5 mg) was regarded as the best treatment agent, although it ranked as third in terms of efficacy.

Figure 3.

Network of PASI 75 response rate. The figures on the blue edges refer to the comparison times. PASI, Psoriasis Area and Severity Index. Image generated using ADDIS software 1.16.5.

Table II.

Node-splitting analysis.

Table II.

Node-splitting analysis.

NameDirect effectIndirect effectOverallP-value
PASI 75
  Adalimumab, MTX−1.03 (−2.13, 0.09)−0.13 (−1.44, 1.31)−0.81 (−1.64, 0.10)0.28
  CSA 2.5 mg, CSA 5 mg2.15 (1.15, 3.13)−0.55 (−2.24, 1.08)1.47 (0.44, 2.41)0.01
  CSA 2.5 mg, MTX−0.51 (−1.71, 0.64)2.24 (0.71, 3.77)0.46 (−0.62, 1.48)0.01
  CSA 5 mg, MTX0.02 (−1.18, 1.24)−2.70 (−4.23, −1.12)−1.01 (−2.06, 0.07)0.01
  Etanercept 25 mg BIW, Etanercept 50 mg BIW0.64 (−0.08, 1.35)−0.05 (−1.03, 0.89)0.41 (−0.27, 1.01)0.23
  Etanercept 50 mg BIW, Placebo−3.02 (−3.57, −2.49)−3.18 (−4.11, −2.32)−3.03 (−3.51, −2.58)0.74
  Etanercept 50 mg BIW, Ustekinumab 45 mg0.46 (−0.61, 1.51)0.51 (−0.19, 1.18)0.48 (−0.15, 1.08)0.9
  Etanercept 50 mg BIW, Ustekinumab 90 mg0.77 (−0.29, 1.80)0.54 (−0.20, 1.20)0.62 (−0.00, 1.23)0.69
  Infliximab 3 mg, Placebo−3.86 (−5.56, −2.35)−3.95 (−5.09, −2.86)−3.95 (−4.95, −3.01)0.94
  Infliximab 5 mg, MTX−2.01 (−3.06, −1.04)−2.18 (−3.45, −0.84)−2.08 (−2.86, −1.25)0.83
  Infliximab 5 mg, Placebo−4.83 (−5.77, −4.02)−4.65 (−6.16, −3.25)−4.73 (−5.50, −4.08)0.81
  MTX, Placebo−2.53 (−3.72, −1.49)−2.70 (−3.69, −1.78)−2.66 (−3.50, −1.92)0.81
  Placebo, Ustekinumab 45 mg3.54 (2.96, 4.11)3.44 (2.39, 4.44)3.52 (2.99, 4.02)0.83
  Placebo, Ustekinumab 90 mg PASI 503.60 (2.97, 4.18)3.83 (2.83, 4.83)3.65 (3.11, 4.17)0.65
PASI 50
  Adalimumab, MTX−1.51 (−2.41, −0.70)0.04 (−1.06, 1.18)−1.10 (−2.03, −0.21)0.02
  Etanercept 25 mg BIW, Etanercept 50 mg BIW0.64 (−0.05, 1.38)0.73 (−0.20, 1.76)0.61 (0.02, 1.21)0.88
  Etanercept 50 mg BIW, Placebo−3.13 (−3.66, −2.70)−3.82 (−4.93, −2.73)−3.22 (−3.78, −2.75)0.24
  Infliximab 3 mg, Placebo−3.11 (−4.31, −1.87)−2.93 (−4.01, −1.89)−3.04 (−3.92, −2.25)0.82
  Infliximab 5 mg, MTX−1.54 (−2.19, −0.88)−3.08 (−4.17, −2.09)−2.02 (−2.88, −1.37)0.01
  Infliximab 5 mg, Placebo−4.45 (−5.18, −3.92)−2.93 (−3.90, −1.90)−4.13 (−4.79, −3.55)0.01
  MTX, Placebo−1.42 (−2.34, −0.45)−2.57 (−3.39, −1.73)−2.11 (−2.85, −1.31)0.06
PASI 90
  Adalimumab, MTX−2.04 (−3.04, −0.99)−0.49 (−1.91, 0.86)−1.67 (−2.58, −0.81)0.08
  Etanercept 25 mg BIW, Etanercept 50 mg BIW0.86 (0.14, 1.62)−0.03 (−1.47, 1.35)0.75 (0.04, 1.39)0.24
  Etanercept 50 mg BIW, Placebo−3.15 (−3.90, −2.45)−3.34 (−4.48, −2.42)−3.16 (−3.78, −2.63)0.76
  Etanercept 50 mg BIW, Ustekinumab 45 mg0.63 (−0.36, 1.70)0.99 (0.12, 1.83)0.82 (0.19, 1.48)0.53
  Etanercept 50 mg BIW, Ustekinumab 90 mg1.00 (0.01, 2.02)0.73 (−0.10, 1.59)0.90 (0.22, 1.52)0.61
  Infliximab 3 mg, Placebo−4.12 (−8.54, −2.14)−3.54 (−4.91, −2.48)−3.56 (−4.64, −2.64)0.69
  Infliximab 5 mg, MTX−1.80 (−2.74, −0.87)−2.98 (−4.73, −1.47)−2.07 (−2.97, −1.38)0.18
  Infliximab 5 mg, Placebo−4.46 (−6.00, −3.43)−3.33 (−4.77, −2.10)−3.93 (−4.80, −3.18)0.2
  MTX, Placebo−1.24 (−2.38, −0.25)−2.30 (−3.43, −1.40)−1.85 (−2.60, −1.07)0.12
  Placebo, Ustekinumab 45 mg4.15 (3.45, 4.86)3.78 (2.83, 4.68)3.99 (3.37, 4.61)0.37
  Placebo, Ustekinumab 90 mg3.99 (3.22, 4.77)4.32 (3.40, 5.28)4.07 (3.40, 4.70)0.44

[i] PASI, Psoriasis Area and Severity Index; MTX, methotrexate; CSA, cyclosporin A; BIW, twice weekly; QW, once weekly.

Table III.

Network meta-analysis of PASI 75 response rate between drugs for treating psoriasis.

Table III.

Network meta-analysis of PASI 75 response rate between drugs for treating psoriasis.

CSAEtanerceptInfliximab Ustekinumab




DrugsAdalimumabBriakinumab2.5 mg5 mg100 mg QW25 mg BIW25 mg QW50 mg BIW50 mg QW3 mg5 mgMTXPlacebo45 mg90 mg
Adalimumab–2.250.311.500.370.430.100.550.251.393.040.390.030.911.04
(0.49,7.32)(0.08,1.34)(0.34,8.64)(0.06,1.53)(0.11,1.59)(0.02,0.45)(0.11,1.67)(0.04,0.94)(0.37,4.75)(0.99,8.77)(0.16,1.02)(0.02,0.06)(0.22,2.54)(0.25,2.91)
Briakinumab0.44–0.140.670.160.200.040.230.110.621.370.180.010.400.46
(0.14,2.03) (0.03,1.01)(0.12,6.22)(0.04,0.61)(0.07,0.69)(0.01,0.19)(0.05,1.03)(0.03,0.37)(0.18,2.46)(0.44,4.88)(0.05,0.70)(0.01,0.03)(0.15,1.02)(0.18,1.17)
CSA 2.5 mg3.227.11–4.981.161.430.341.740.784.429.891.290.092.883.32
(0.74,12.82)(0.99,36.73) (1.75,13.54)(0.13,7.39)(0.24,7.30)(0.04,2.07)(0.23,8.30)(0.10,4.39)(0.85,20.65)(2.18,39.43)(0.37,3.97)(0.01,0.35)(0.46,12.78)(0.51,14.83)
CSA 5 mg0.671.490.20–0.240.290.070.360.160.912.060.440.020.600.69
(0.12,2.95)(0.16,8.29)(0.07,0.57) (0.02,1.67)(0.04,1.67)(0.01,0.47)(0.03,1.95)(0.01,1.02)(0.12,4.84)(0.30,9.18)(0.14,1.57)(0.00,0.08)(0.07,2.96)(0.08,3.38)
Etanercept2.736.150.864.15–1.230.281.460.663.858.511.110.072.482.85
100 mg QW(0.65,17.41)(1.63,23.99)(0.14,7.79)(0.60,51.05) (0.35,5.34)(0.08,1.07)(0.62,3.62)(0.22,2.09)(0.86,19.38)(2.13,40.28)(0.26,5.97)(0.02,0.24)(0.80,7.72)(0.91,8.85)
Etanercept2.325.070.703.400.82–0.281.430.553.197.090.900.062.022.32
25 mg BIW(0.63,8.84)(1.44,14.66)(0.14,4.22)(0.60,27.08)(0.19,2.89) (0.06,1.16)(0.39,4.95)(0.15,1.65)(0.77,11.49)(1.92,22.79)(0.24,3.19)(0.02,0.13)(0.72,4.84)(0.81,5.63)
Etanercept9.7322.272.9714.403.553.60–5.252.3713.9129.783.860.268.8110.19
25 mg QW(2.22,58.96)(5.23,85.70)(0.48,27.13)(2.13,179.59)(0.94,12.49)(0.86,16.14) (1.99,13.30)(0.73,7.27)(2.92,65.68)(7.31,139.88)(0.91,20.80)(0.05,1.37)(2.69,28.14)(3.01,31.84)
Etanercept1.834.290.582.750.690.700.19–0.452.655.700.740.051.681.85
50 mg BIW(0.60,9.27)(0.97,18.85)(0.12,4.32)(0.51,30.05)(0.28,1.62)(0.20,2.55)(0.08,0.50) (0.23,0.89)(0.76,10.26)(1.94,21.09)(0.24,3.10)(0.01,0.21)(0.81,3.59)(0.48,7.46)
Etanercept4.059.311.286.171.511.810.422.21–5.7512.641.650.113.754.28
50 mg QW(1.07,23.01)(2.69,31.37)(0.23,10.48)(0.98,71.10)(0.48,4.51)(0.61,6.84)(0.14,1.36)(1.12,4.33) (1.43,27.06)(3.64,54.57)(0.44,7.93)(0.04,0.30)(1.36,9.87)(1.56,11.25)
Infliximab0.721.610.231.100.260.310.070.380.17–2.180.290.020.650.74
3 mg(0.21,2.67)(0.41,5.67)(0.05,1.17)(0.21,8.04)(0.05,1.16)(0.09,1.30)(0.02,0.34)(0.10,1.31)(0.04,0.70) (1.10,4.75)(0.10,0.87)(0.01,0.05)(0.19,1.97)(0.21,2.29)
Infliximab0.330.730.100.490.120.140.030.180.080.46–0.130.010.290.34
5 mg(0.11,1.01)(0.20,2.28)(0.03,0.46)(0.11,3.34)(0.02,0.47)(0.04,0.52)(0.01,0.14)(0.05,0.51)(0.02,0.27)(0.21,0.91) (0.06,0.31)(0.00,0.02)(0.09,0.78)(0.11,0.90)
MTX2.555.570.782.250.901.110.261.350.613.497.69–0.052.262.59
(0.99,6.18)(1.42,18.42)(0.25,2.68)(0.64,6.94)(0.17,3.89)(0.31,4.20)(0.05,1.10)(0.32,4.20)(0.13,2.26)(1.15,9.75)(3.28,17.36) (0.00,0.15)(0.63,6.30)(0.72,7.30)
Placebo30.9384.2911.7155.9013.5716.613.8320.249.1053.49117.8119.04–33.5738.81
(16.26,58.97)(37.74,187.34)(2.86,69.09)(12.23,452.23)(4.22,41.45)(7.77,43.27)(0.73,18.81)(4.73,75.32)(3.34,24.47)(19.24,158.08)(54.46,286.70)(6.83,242.20) (20.28,55.73)(22.22,64.79)
Ustekinumab1.092.480.351.660.400.490.110.600.271.543.430.440.03–1.19
45 mg(0.39,4.55)(0.98,6.47)(0.08,2.18)(0.34,14.71)(0.13,1.26)(0.21,1.38)(0.04,0.37)(0.28,1.23)(0.10,0.74)(0.51,5.35)(1.28,10.57)(0.16,1.58)(0.02,0.05) (0.34,4.29)
Ustekinumab0.962.170.301.440.350.430.100.540.231.362.970.390.030.84–
90 mg(0.34,3.97)(0.85,5.68)(0.07,1.95)(0.30,13.07)(0.11,1.10)(0.18,1.23)(0.03,0.33)(0.13,2.07)(0.09,0.64)(0.44,4.82)(1.11,9.46)(0.14,1.40)(0.02,0.05)(0.23,2.94)

[i] PASI, Psoriasis Area and Severity Index; MTX, methotrexate; CSA, cyclosporin A; BIW, twice weekly; QW, once weekly.

Table IV.

Network meta-analysis of PASI 50 response rate between drugs for treating psoriasis.

Table IV.

Network meta-analysis of PASI 50 response rate between drugs for treating psoriasis.

EtanerceptInfliximab Ustekinumab



DrugsAdalimumabCSA 5 mg100 mg QW25 mg BIW25 mg QW50 mg BIW3 mg5 mgMTXPlacebo45 mg90 mg
Adalimumab–1.120.590.410.170.790.611.750.290.041.401.85
(0.22,7.80)(0.12,2.68)(0.11,1.38)(0.04,0.65)(0.21,2.82)(0.18,2.20)(0.59,5.64)(0.12,0.72)(0.01,0.11)(0.36,4.25)(0.47,5.75)
CSA 5 mg0.89–0.510.350.150.670.551.570.260.031.211.59
(0.13,4.63) (0.06,3.81)(0.05,2.02)(0.02,0.94)(0.10,4.15)(0.08,3.08)(0.27,8.03)(0.05,1.01)(0.00,0.13)(0.17,6.72)(0.22,8.98)
Etanercept1.711.97–0.700.291.331.063.040.500.052.363.14
100 mg QW(0.37,8.01)(0.26,16.88) (0.22,2.31)(0.08,1.10)(0.58,3.37)(0.27,4.26)(0.85,11.44)(0.12,2.03)(0.02,0.15)(0.70,7.67)(0.90,10.08)
Etanercept2.442.831.43–0.421.881.544.350.710.083.364.51
25 mg BIW(0.72,9.29)(0.49,18.45)(0.43,4.52) (0.19,0.88)(0.60,7.67)(0.56,3.92)(1.84,10.84)(0.25,1.96)(0.04,0.12)(1.56,6.53)(1.92,8.78)
Etanercept5.826.763.472.38–4.483.6710.431.700.188.0610.77
25 mg QW(1.55,24.11)(1.06,50.81)(0.91,12.67)(1.14,5.26) (1.25,21.93)(1.18,11.20)(3.89,31.14)(0.52,5.66)(0.08,0.39)(3.09,19.57)(3.84,25.87)
Etanercept1.271.480.750.530.22–0.802.280.370.041.762.36
50 mg BIW(0.36,4.71)(0.24,9.91)(0.30,1.74)(0.13,1.66)(0.05,0.80) (0.26,2.15)(0.88,5.66)(0.12,1.08)(0.02,0.07)(0.72,3.61)(0.90,4.92)
Infliximab1.631.830.940.650.271.25–2.870.470.052.182.91
3 mg(0.45,5.59)(0.33,11.99)(0.23,3.72)(0.26,1.79)(0.09,0.85)(0.47,3.79) (1.49,5.97)(0.17,1.18)(0.02,0.11)(0.79,5.79)(1.00,7.85)
Infliximab0.570.640.330.230.100.440.35–0.160.010.771.01
5 mg(0.18,1.69)(0.12,3.76)(0.09,1.18)(0.09,0.54)(0.03,0.26)(0.18,1.14)(0.17,0.67) (0.07,0.32)(0.01,0.03)(0.30,1.81)(0.38,2.38)
MTX3.473.902.011.410.592.682.136.07–0.164.736.32
(1.40,8.48)(0.99,20.60)(0.49,8.47)(0.51,4.03)(0.18,1.93)(0.92,8.59)(0.85,5.91)(3.09,14.56) (0.07,0.42)(1.65,12.90)(2.13,17.45)
Placebo25.5437.0319.1513.185.5625.1820.4875.646.11–44.2459.44
(8.86,70.76)(7.41,242.17)(6.52,56.34)(8.43,23.22)(2.58,12.19)(14.53,50.34)(8.87,47.46)(37.84,166.80)(2.36,14.83) (26.51,73.29)(32.83,99.32)
Ustekinumab0.720.830.420.300.120.570.461.300.210.02–1.34
45 mg(0.24,2.79)(0.15,5.84)(0.13,1.43)(0.15,0.64)(0.05,0.32)(0.28,1.38)(0.17,1.26)(0.55,3.33)(0.08,0.61)(0.01,0.04) (0.77,2.22)
Ustekinumab0.540.630.320.220.090.420.340.990.160.020.75–
90 mg(0.17,2.12)(0.11,4.46)(0.10,1.12)(0.11,0.52)(0.04,0.26)(0.20,1.11)(0.13,1.00)(0.42,2.64)(0.06,0.47)(0.01,0.03)(0.45,1.30)

[i] PASI, Psoriasis Area and Severity Index; MTX, methotrexate; CSA, cyclosporin A; BIW, twice weekly; QW, once weekly.

Table V.

Network meta-analysis of PASI 90 response rate between different drugs used to treat psoriasis.

Table V.

Network meta-analysis of PASI 90 response rate between different drugs used to treat psoriasis.

EtanerceptInfliximab Ustekinumab



DrugsAdalimumabBriakinumabCSA 5 mg25 mg BIW25 mg QW50 mg BIW3 mg5 mgMTXPlacebo45 mg90 mg
Adalimumab–3.84 (1.16,11.56)0.66 (0.11,4.09)0.33 (0.12,1.04)0.08 (0.02,0.33)0.70 (0.28,1.85)1.03 (0.35,3.58)1.50 (0.58,4.27)0.19 (0.08,0.44)0.03 (0.01,0.06)1.60 (0.63,4.31)1.71 (0.64,4.60)
Briakinumab0.26 (0.09,0.86)–0.17 (0.03,1.36)0.09 (0.04,0.25)0.02 (0.00,0.08)0.18 (0.10,0.38)0.27 (0.08,1.14)0.39 (0.13,1.44)0.05 (0.02,0.16)0.01 (0.00,0.02)0.42 (0.18,1.11)0.45 (0.19,1.15)
CSA 5 mg1.51 (0.24,9.19)5.76 (0.73,39.77)–0.50 (0.07,3.26)0.12 (0.01,0.91)1.09 (0.16,6.79)1.58 (0.25,9.60)2.27 (0.38,12.56)0.28 (0.06,1.23)0.05 (0.01,0.27)2.48 (0.34,15.66)2.65 (0.37,17.51)
Etanercept3.0311.472.00–0.232.123.134.520.560.094.795.20
25 mg BIW(0.96,8.27)(4.06,27.25)(0.31,14.20) (0.06,0.74)(1.04,4.02)(0.90,11.65)(1.51,13.74)(0.17,1.64)(0.04,0.18)(1.92,11.25)(2.01,11.76)
Etanercept13.1750.028.644.34–9.0813.8719.962.540.3920.5622.36
25 mg QW(3.06,58.45)(12.01,212.82)(1.10,79.40)(1.36,17.31) (2.86,33.94)(2.99,74.25)(4.65,97.31)(0.53,10.70)(0.11,1.48)(5.65,85.77)(5.77,93.02)
Etanercept1.425.430.920.470.11–1.462.120.270.042.272.46
50 mg BIW(0.54,3.57)(2.62,10.08)(0.15,6.31)(0.25,0.96)(0.03,0.35) (0.51,5.15)(0.85,6.07)(0.10,0.70)(0.02,0.07)(1.21,4.37)(1.25,4.56)
Infliximab0.973.710.630.320.070.68–1.450.180.031.551.68 (0.45,4.92)
3 mg(0.28,2.87)(0.88,12.40)(0.10,4.03)(0.09,1.11)(0.01,0.33)(0.19,1.97) (0.74,2.71)(0.06,0.43)(0.01,0.07)(0.43,4.64)
Infliximab0.672.560.440.220.050.470.69–0.130.021.071.16
5 mg(0.23,1.71)(0.70,7.58)(0.08,2.63)(0.07,0.66)(0.01,0.21)(0.16,1.18)(0.37,1.36) (0.05,0.25)(0.01,0.04)(0.36,2.79)(0.37,3.04)
MTX5.31 (2.25,13.20)20.30 (6.20,62.98)3.55 (0.81,17.74)1.79 (0.61,5.77)0.39 (0.09,1.89)3.77 (1.43,10.05)5.50 (2.32,16.93)7.96 (3.98,19.45)–0.16 (0.07,0.34)8.58 (3.19,23.75)9.20 (3.33,25.36)
Placebo33.59130.1222.1411.082.5723.5535.1351.036.34–53.9358.50
(16.46,70.67)(52.97,292.89)(3.73,137.96)(5.43,26.18)(0.67,8.86)(13.83,43.77)(13.99,103.31)(23.99,121.47)(2.92,13.46) (29.01,100.56)(29.98,110.26)
Ustekinumab0.632.410.400.210.050.440.650.930.120.02–1.09
45 mg(0.23,1.58)(0.90,5.51)(0.06,2.91)(0.09,0.52)(0.01,0.18)(0.23,0.82)(0.22,2.31)(0.36,2.81)(0.04,0.31)(0.01,0.03) (0.66,1.67)
Ustekinumab0.582.210.380.190.040.410.600.860.110.020.92–
90 mg(0.22,1.57)(0.87,5.33)(0.06,2.69)(0.09,0.50)(0.01,0.17)(0.22,0.80)(0.20,2.24)(0.33,2.74)(0.04,0.30)(0.01,0.03)(0.60,1.52)

[i] PASI, Psoriasis Area and Severity Index; MTX, methotrexate; CSA, cyclosporin A; BIW, twice weekly; QW, once weekly.

Table VI.

Rank analysis of PASI 90 response rate of the drugs for treating psoriasis.

Table VI.

Rank analysis of PASI 90 response rate of the drugs for treating psoriasis.

TreatmentRank 1Rank 2Rank 3Rank 4Rank 5Rank 6Rank 7Rank 8Rank 9Rank 10Rank 11Rank 12
Adalimumab0.010.030.050.130.210.280.220.070.010.000.000.00
Briakinumab0.860.080.030.020.010.000.000.000.000.000.000.00
CSA 5 mg0.030.070.040.060.070.090.140.250.170.050.010.00
Etanercept 25 mg BIW0.000.000.000.000.000.010.030.230.590.140.000.00
Etanercept 25 mg QW0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.020.090.810.07
Etanercept 50 mg BIW0.000.000.000.030.070.180.350.350.010.000.000.00
Infliximab 3 mg0.020.040.090.090.220.240.200.090.020.000.000.00
Infliximab 5 mg0.050.230.160.300.180.080.020.000.000.000.000.00
MTX0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.010.180.700.100.00
Placebo0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.070.93
Ustekinumab 45 mg0.010.180.350.210.140.080.020.000.000.000.000.00
Ustekinumab 90 mg0.020.370.280.160.100.050.020.000.000.000.000.00

[i] Rank 1 indicates the best rating, while Rank 12 indicates the worst rating. PASI, Psoriasis Area and Severity Index; MTX, methotrexate; CSA, cyclosporin A; BIW, twice weekly; QW, once weekly.

Discussion

In the present study, a network meta-analysis was performed to systematically review and compare the efficacy of seven drugs used at different doses for treating moderate to severe psoriasis. Based on the results of the network analysis, infliximab (5 mg) may be an appropriate option to treat moderate to severe psoriasis.

Psoriasis has been reported to be associated with a high concentration of TNF-α (41) and infliximab treatment can neutralize the biological activity of TNF-α (42). However, the role of the TNF-α in the pathogenesis of psoriasis remains unclear. Previous studies have reported that TNF-α may serve an important role in the upstream of the inflammatory responses of psoriasis (43,44). An in vitro study determined that infliximab was able to inhibit the activation of skin-homing T cells and impair the antigen-presenting capacity of immature dendritic cells in psoriasis patients (43). However, another TNF-α inhibitor, etanercept, has been found to be effective in the treatment of psoriasis by reducing the Th17 cell products, as well as the production of IL-17, IL-22, IL-23 and inducible NO synthase from dendritic cells (44). Thus, it has been suggested that the infliximab may serve a different role with other treatments on moderate to severe psoriasis.

Although the present meta-analysis indicated that infliximab treatment had a high PASI score, a higher percentage of adverse events were observed in infliximab-treated patients compared with those in the placebo group (18), indicating that infliximab treatment induces adverse effects. In addition, infliximab treatment increases the incidence of infusion reactions (45). However, these outcomes were not considered to be important due to the small sample size of each study or the fact that the data were unavailable. Thus, the therapeutic effect of the infliximab should be systematically assessed in further studies. Besides, the dosage and treatment duration of infliximab should be optimized according to the disease severity of psoriasis.

In the present study, briakinumab and ustekinumab (90 mg) treatments were superior to other treatments for PASI 90 response. Thus, anti-IL-12/23 monoclonal antibodies appear to be more appropriate compared with anti-TNF-α treatment for treating moderate to severe psoriasis. However, briakinumab and ustekinumab showed no significantly improved therapeutic effect in PASI 75 and PASI 50 responses when compared with the anti-TNF-α treatments. In addition, the long-term safety profile, including severe infections and cardiac disorders, should be evaluated in further studies with large sample sizes and strict study design.

To the best of our knowledge, the present study is the first network meta-analysis for evaluating the efficacy of various treatments for moderate to severe psoriasis. The current results may provide information for clinician and patients on the selection of the suitable treatment for moderate to severe psoriasis. However, there were also several limitations in the present meta-analysis. Firstly, due to unavailable data in certain included studies, confounding variables could not be adjusted and subgroup analysis was not performed to reduce the effect of the confounding variables. Secondly, due to unknown bias, the network analyses of PASI 75 and PASI 50 responses were performed using an inconsistency model. Finally, the results of the network meta-analysis should be pooled only by a random effects model. Thus, the pooled results may be conservative and certain borderline significant effects may have been ignored (46).

In conclusion, the present meta-analysis results suggested that infliximab (5 mg) may be a superior option compared with other drugs for treating moderate to severe psoriasis due to the relatively high PASI scores of patients. However, despite the high PASI 90 responses, the efficacy of ustekinumab (90 mg) and briakinumab were also high and therefore should be investigated in further studies.

References

1 

Parisi R, Symmons DP, Griffiths CE and Ashcroft DM; Identification and Management of Psoriasis and Associated ComorbidiTy (IMPACT) project team, . Global epidemiology of psoriasis: A systematic review of incidence and prevalence. J Invest Dermatol. 133:377–385. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

2 

Menter A, Gottlieb A, Feldman SR, Van Voorhees AS, Leonardi CL, Gordon KB, Lebwohl M, Koo JY, Elmets CA, Korman NJ, et al: Guidelines of care for the management of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis: Section 1. Overview of psoriasis and guidelines of care for the treatment of psoriasis with biologics. J Am Acad Dermatol. 58:826–850. 2008.

3 

Griffiths CE and Barker JN: Pathogenesis and clinical features of psoriasis. Lancet. 370:263–271. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

4 

Antoni CE, Kavanaugh A, Kirkham B, Tutuncu Z, Burmester GR, Schneider U, Furst DE, Molitor J, Keystone E, Gladman D, et al: Sustained benefits of infliximab therapy for dermatologic and articular manifestations of psoriatic arthritis: Results from the infliximab multinational psoriatic arthritis controlled trial (IMPACT). Arthritis Rheum. 52:1227–1236. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

5 

Asahina A, Nakagawa H, Etoh T and Ohtsuki M; Adalimumab M04-688 Study Group, . Adalimumab in Japanese patients with moderate to severe chronic plaque psoriasis: Efficacy and safety results from a Phase II/III randomized controlled study. J Dermatol. 37:299–310. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

6 

Griffiths C, Sterry W, Brock F, Dilleen M, Stefanidis D, Germain JM and Mallbris L: Pattern of response in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis treated with etanercept. Br J Dermatol. 172:230–238. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

7 

Sterry W, Ortonne JP, Kirkham B, Brocq O, Robertson D, Pedersen RD, Estojak J, Molta CT and Freundlich B: Comparison of two etanercept regimens for treatment of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis: PRESTA randomised double blind multicentre trial. BMJ. 340:c1472010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

8 

Strober BE, Crowley JJ, Yamauchi PS, Olds M and Williams DA: Efficacy and safety results from a phase III, randomized controlled trial comparing the safety and efficacy of briakinumab with etanercept and placebo in patients with moderate to severe chronic plaque psoriasis. Br J Dermatol. 165:661–668. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

9 

Bagel J, Lynde C, Tyring S, Kricorian G, Shi Y and Klekotka P: Moderate to severe plaque psoriasis with scalp involvement: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of etanercept. J Am Acad Dermatol. 67:86–92. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

10 

Schäfer I, Hacker J, Rustenbach SJ, Radtke M, Franzke N and Augustin M: Concordance of the psoriasis area and severity index (PASI) and patient-reported outcomes in psoriasis treatment. Eur J Dermatol. 20:62–67. 2010.PubMed/NCBI

11 

Mrowietz U, Kragballe K, Reich K, Spuls P, Griffiths CE, Nast A, Franke J, Antoniou C, Arenberger P, Balieva F, et al: Definition of treatment goals for moderate to severe psoriasis: A European consensus. Arch Dermatol Res. 303:1–10. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

12 

Higgins JP, Altman DG, Gøtzsche PC, Jüni P, Moher D, Oxman AD, Savovic J, Schulz KF, Weeks L, Sterne JA, et al: The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 343:d59282011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

13 

Dias S, Welton NJ, Caldwell DM and Ades AE: Checking consistency in mixed treatment comparison meta-analysis. Stat Med. 29:932–944. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

14 

Barker J, Hoffmann M, Wozel G, Ortonne JP, Zheng H, van Hoogstraten H and Reich K: Efficacy and safety of infliximab vs. methotrexate in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis: Results of an open-label, active-controlled, randomized trial (RESTORE1). Br J Dermatol. 165:1109–1117. 2011.

15 

Cassano N, Miracapillo A, Coviello C, Loconsole F, Bellino M and Vena GA: Treatment of psoriasis vulgaris with the two-compound product calcipotriol/betamethasone dipropionate followed by different formulations of calcipotriol. Clin Drug Investig. 26:227–233. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

16 

Flytstrom I, Stenberg B, Svensson A and Bergbrant IM: Methotrexate vs. ciclosporin in psoriasis: effectiveness, quality of life and safety. A randomized controlled trial. Br J Dermatol. 158:116–121. 2008.

17 

Gordon KB, Langley RG, Leonardi C, Toth D, Menter MA, Kang S, Heffernan M, Miller B, Hamlin R, Lim L, et al: Clinical response to adalimumab treatment in patients with moderate to severe psoriasis: Double-blind, randomized controlled trial and open-label extension study. J Am Acad Dermatol. 55:598–606. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

18 

Gottlieb AB, Evans R, Li S, Dooley LT, Guzzo CA, Baker D, Bala M, Marano CW and Menter A: Infliximab induction therapy for patients with severe plaque-type psoriasis: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. J Am Acad Dermatol. 51:534–542. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

19 

Gottlieb AB, Leonardi C, Kerdel F, Mehlis S, Olds M and Williams DA: Efficacy and safety of briakinumab vs. etanercept and placebo in patients with moderate to severe chronic plaque psoriasis. Br J Dermatol. 165:652–660. 2011.

20 

Gottlieb AB, Matheson RT, Lowe N, Krueger GG, Kang S, Goffe BS, Gaspari AA, Ling M, Weinstein GD, Nayak A, et al: A randomized trial of etanercept as monotherapy for psoriasis. Arch Dermatol. 139:1627–1632. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

21 

Griffiths CE: Comparing biological therapies in psoriasis: Implications for clinical practice. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 24 (Suppl 6):S10–S14. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar

22 

Heydendael VM, Spuls PI, Opmeer BC, de Borgie CA, Reitsma JB, Goldschmidt WF, Bossuyt PM, Bos JD and de Rie MA: Methotrexate versus cyclosporine in moderate-to-severe chronic plaque psoriasis. N Engl J Med. 349:658–665. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

23 

Ho SG, Yeung CK and Chan HH: Methotrexate versus traditional Chinese medicine in psoriasis: A randomized, placebo-controlled trial to determine efficacy, safety and quality of life. Clin Exp Dermatol. 35:717–722. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

24 

Igarashi A, Kato T, Kato M, Song M and Nakagawa H; Japanese Ustekinumab Study Group, . Efficacy and safety of ustekinumab in Japanese patients with moderate-to-severe plaque-type psoriasis: Long-term results from a phase 2/3 clinical trial. J Dermatol. 39:242–252. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

25 

Laburte C, Grossman R, Abi-Rached J, Abeywickrama K and Dubertret L: Efficacy and safety of oral cyclosporin A (CyA; Sandimmun) for long-term treatment of chronic severe plaque psoriasis. Br J Dermatol. 130:366–375. 1994. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

26 

Leonardi CL, Kimball AB, Papp KA, Yeilding N, Guzzo C, Wang Y, Li S, Dooley LT and Gordon KB; PHOENIX 1 study investigators, . Efficacy and safety of ustekinumab, a human interleukin-12/23 monoclonal antibody, in patients with psoriasis: 76-week results from a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (PHOENIX 1). Lancet. 371:1665–1674. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

27 

Leonardi CL, Powers JL, Matheson RT, Goffe BS, Zitnik R, Wang A and Gottlieb AB; Etanercept Psoriasis Study Group, . Etanercept as monotherapy in patients with psoriasis. N Engl J Med. 349:2014–2022. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

28 

McInnes IB, Kavanaugh A, Gottlieb AB, Puig L, Rahman P, Ritchlin C, Brodmerkel C, Li S, Wang Y, Mendelsohn AM, et al: Efficacy and safety of ustekinumab in patients with active psoriatic arthritis: 1 year results of the phase 3, multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled PSUMMIT 1 trial. Lancet. 382:780–789. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

29 

Menter A, Feldman SR, Weinstein GD, Papp K, Evans R, Guzzo C, Li S, Dooley LT, Arnold C and Gottlieb AB: A randomized comparison of continuous vs. intermittent infliximab maintenance regimens over 1 year in the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 56(31): e1–e15. 2007.PubMed/NCBI

30 

Menter A, Tyring SK, Gordon K, Kimball AB, Leonardi CL, Langley RG, Strober BE, Kaul M, Gu Y, Okun M and Papp K: Adalimumab therapy for moderate to severe psoriasis: A randomized, controlled phase III trial. J Am Acad Dermatol. 58:106–115. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

31 

Papp KA, Langley RG, Lebwohl M, Krueger GG, Szapary P, Yeilding N, Guzzo C, Hsu MC, Wang Y, Li S, et al: Efficacy and safety of ustekinumab, a human interleukin-12/23 monoclonal antibody, in patients with psoriasis: 52-week results from a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (PHOENIX 2). Lancet. 371:1675–1684. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

32 

Papp KA, Tyring S, Lahfa M, Prinz J, Griffiths CE, Nakanishi AM, Zitnik R, van de Kerkhof PC and Melvin L; Etanercept Psoriasis Study Group, . A global phase III randomized controlled trial of etanercept in psoriasis: Safety, efficacy and effect of dose reduction. Br J Dermatol. 152:1304–1312. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

33 

Reich K, Nestle FO, Papp K, Ortonne JP, Evans R, Guzzo C, Li S, Dooley LT and Griffiths CE: EXPRESS study investigators: Infliximab induction and maintenance therapy for moderate-to-severe psoriasis: A phase III, multicentre, double-blind trial. Lancet. 366:1367–1374. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

34 

Revicki D, Willian MK, Saurat JH, Papp KA, Ortonne JP, Sexton C and Camez A: Impact of adalimumab treatment on health-related quality of life and other patient-reported outcomes: Results from a 16-week randomized controlled trial in patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. Br J Dermatol. 158:549–557. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

35 

Torii H and Nakagawa H; Japanese Infliximab Study investigators, . Infliximab monotherapy in Japanese patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicenter trial. J Dermatol Sci. 59:40–49. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

36 

Tsai TF, Ho JC, Song M, Szapary P, Guzzo C, Shen YK, Li S, Kim KJ, Kim TY, Choi JH, et al: Efficacy and safety of ustekinumab for the treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis: A phase III, randomized, placebo-controlled trial in Taiwanese and Korean patients (PEARL). J Dermatol Sci. 63:154–163. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

37 

Tyring S, Gottlieb A, Papp K, Gordon K, Leonardi C, Wang A, Lalla D, Woolley M, Jahreis A, Zitnik R, et al: Etanercept and clinical outcomes, fatigue, and depression in psoriasis: Double-blind placebo-controlled randomised phase III trial. Lancet. 367:29–35. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

38 

van de Kerkhof PC, Segaert S, Lahfa M, Luger TA, Karolyi Z, Kaszuba A, Leigheb G, Camacho FM, Forsea D, Zang C, et al: Once weekly administration of etanercept 50 mg is efficacious and well tolerated in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis: A randomized controlled trial with open-label extension. Br J Dermatol. 159:1177–1185. 2008.PubMed/NCBI

39 

Yang HZ, Wang K, Jin HZ, Gao TW, Xiao SX, Xu JH, Wang BX, Zhang FR, Li CY, Liu XM, et al: Infliximab monotherapy for Chinese patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicenter trial. Chin Med J (Engl). 125:1845–1851. 2012.PubMed/NCBI

40 

Cassano N, Loconsole F, Miracapillo A, Travaglini M, Digiuseppe MD, Congedo M, Galluccio A, Buquicchio R, Mastrandrea V, Filieri M, et al: Treatment of psoriasis with different dosage regimens of etanercept: Preliminary results from the Tαranta plastic study group. Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol. 23:797–802. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

41 

Mussi A, Bonifati C, Carducci M, D'Agosto G, Pimpinelli F, D'Urso D, D'Auria L, Fazio M and Ameglio F: Serum TNF-alpha levels correlate with disease severity and are reduced by effective therapy in plaque-type psoriasis. J Biol Regul Homeost Agents. 11:115–118. 1997.PubMed/NCBI

42 

Cooper C, Shafran S, Greenbloom S, Enns R, Farley J, Hilzenrat N, Williams K, Elkashab M, Abadir N and Neuman M: Single-dose infliximab in hepatitis C genotype 1 treatment-naive patients with high serum tumour necrosis factor-alpha does not influence the efficacy of pegylated interferon alpha-2b/ribavirin therapy. Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 28:35–40. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

43 

Bedini C, Nasorri F, Girolomoni G, Pità Od and Cavani A: Antitumour necrosis factor-alpha chimeric antibody (infliximab) inhibits activation of skin-homing CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocytes and impairs dendritic cell function. Br J Dermatol. 157:249–258. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

44 

Gottlieb AB, Chamian F, Masud S, Cardinale I, Abello MV, Lowes MA, Chen F, Magliocco M and Krueger JG: TNF inhibition rapidly down-regulates multiple proinflammatory pathways in psoriasis plaques. J Immunol. 175:2721–2729. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

45 

Steenholdt C, Svenson M, Bendtzen K, Thomsen OØ, Brynskov J and Ainsworth MA: Severe infusion reactions to infliximab: aetiology, immunogenicity and risk factors in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 34:51–58. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

46 

Van Valkenhoef G, Tervonen T, Zwinkels T, de Brock B and Hillege H: ADDIS: A decision support system for evidence-based medicine. Decis Support Syst. 55:459–475. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar

Related Articles

  • Abstract
  • View
  • Download
  • Twitter
Copy and paste a formatted citation
Spandidos Publications style
Geng W, Zhao J, Fu J, Zhang H and Qiao S: Efficacy of several biological therapies for treating moderate to severe psoriasis: A network meta‑analysis. Exp Ther Med 16: 5085-5095, 2018.
APA
Geng, W., Zhao, J., Fu, J., Zhang, H., & Qiao, S. (2018). Efficacy of several biological therapies for treating moderate to severe psoriasis: A network meta‑analysis. Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine, 16, 5085-5095. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2018.6859
MLA
Geng, W., Zhao, J., Fu, J., Zhang, H., Qiao, S."Efficacy of several biological therapies for treating moderate to severe psoriasis: A network meta‑analysis". Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine 16.6 (2018): 5085-5095.
Chicago
Geng, W., Zhao, J., Fu, J., Zhang, H., Qiao, S."Efficacy of several biological therapies for treating moderate to severe psoriasis: A network meta‑analysis". Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine 16, no. 6 (2018): 5085-5095. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2018.6859
Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Geng W, Zhao J, Fu J, Zhang H and Qiao S: Efficacy of several biological therapies for treating moderate to severe psoriasis: A network meta‑analysis. Exp Ther Med 16: 5085-5095, 2018.
APA
Geng, W., Zhao, J., Fu, J., Zhang, H., & Qiao, S. (2018). Efficacy of several biological therapies for treating moderate to severe psoriasis: A network meta‑analysis. Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine, 16, 5085-5095. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2018.6859
MLA
Geng, W., Zhao, J., Fu, J., Zhang, H., Qiao, S."Efficacy of several biological therapies for treating moderate to severe psoriasis: A network meta‑analysis". Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine 16.6 (2018): 5085-5095.
Chicago
Geng, W., Zhao, J., Fu, J., Zhang, H., Qiao, S."Efficacy of several biological therapies for treating moderate to severe psoriasis: A network meta‑analysis". Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine 16, no. 6 (2018): 5085-5095. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2018.6859
Follow us
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
About
  • Spandidos Publications
  • Careers
  • Cookie Policy
  • Privacy Policy
How can we help?
  • Help
  • Live Chat
  • Contact
  • Email to our Support Team