Effectiveness of transcutaneous electrical stimulation combined with artificial tears for the treatment of dry eye: A randomized controlled trial

Cai,Ming-Ming; Zhang,Jie

doi:10.3892/etm.2020.9305

Effectiveness of transcutaneous electrical stimulation combined with artificial tears for the treatment of dry eye: A randomized controlled trial

Authors:
- Ming-Ming Cai
- Jie Zhang
View Affiliations

Affiliations: Department of Ophthalmology, The Ninth People's Hospital of Chongqing, Chongqing 400700, P.R. China, Department of Urology, The Ninth People's Hospital of Chongqing, Chongqing 400700, P.R. China
Published online on: October 9, 2020 https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2020.9305
Article Number: 175
Copyright: © Cai et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License.

Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )

Metrics: Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )

Cited By (CrossRef): 0 citations Loading Articles...

Abstract

There is currently no available cure or universally effective treatment for dry eye (DE). The aim of the present study was to investigate the clinical efficacy of transcutaneous electrical stimulation (TES) combined with artificial tears in treating DE. Patients diagnosed with DE were referred for therapy with TES combined with sodium hyaluronate (SH)‑containing artificial tears. A total of 52 patients (104 eyes) with DE were enrolled in this randomized controlled trial. The patients were randomized 1:1 to the TES + SH or SH group. The patients in the TES + SH group were treated with 20 sessions (5 sessions per week for 4 weeks), and each session lasted for 20 min. The treatment was continued for 4 weeks in all cases. The Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI), tear film breakup time (BUT), Schirmer's I test and corneal fluorescein scores were used to assess treatment efficacy. A total of 90 eyes of 45 patients completed all aspects of the study: 22 patients (44 eyes) in the TES + SH group and 23 patients (46 eyes) in the SH group. There was no statistically significant difference in sex, age or course between the two groups. The mean OSDI scores, BUT, Schirmer's I test and corneal fluorescein scores exhibited a significant improvement in the TES + SH group compared with the SH group after treatment. No serious adverse events were recorded during TES treatment. In conclusion, TES combined with artificial tears appeared to be an effective treatment for DE. Therefore, TES may represent a new therapeutic option with promising potential applications.

View Figures

View References

1	Craig JP, Nichols KK, Akpek EK, Caffery B, Dua HS, Joo CK, Liu Z, Nelson JD, Nichols JJ, Tsubota K and Stapleton F: TFOS DEWS II defnition and classifcation report. Ocul Surf. 15:276–283. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
2	Merayo-Lloves J, Sanchez-Avila RM, Riestra AC, Anitua E, Begoña L, Orive G and Fernandez-Vega L: Safety and efficacy of autologous plasma rich in growth factors eye drops for the treatment of evaporative dry eye. Ophthalmic Res. 56:68–73. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
3	García-Conca V, Abad-Collado M, Hueso-Abancens JR, Mengual-Verdú E, Piñero DP, Aguirre-Balsalobre F and Molina JC: Efficacy and safety of treatment of hyposecretory dry eye with platelet-rich plasma. Acta Ophthalmol. 97:e170–e178. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
4	Friedman NJ, Butron K, Robledo N, Loudin J, Baba SN and Chayet A: A nonrandomized, open-label study to evaluate the effect of nasal stimulation on tear production in subjects with dry eye disease. Clin Ophthalmol. 10:795–804. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
5	Kossler AL, Wang J, Feuer W and Tse DT: Neurostimulation of the lacrimal nerve for enhanced tear production. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 31:145–151. 2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
6	Rosenthal P and Borsook D: The corneal pain system Part I: The missing piece of the dry eye puzzle. Ocul Surf. 10:2–14. 2012.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
7	Sivanesan E, Levitt RC, Sarantopoulos CD, Patin D and Galor A: Noninvasive electrical stimulation for the treatment of chronic ocular pain and photophobia. Neuromodulation. 21:727–734. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
8	Gofeld M: New horizons in neuromodulation. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 18(397)2014.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
9	Goroszeniuk T and Pang D: Peripheral neuromodulation: A review. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 18(412)2014.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
10	Kacker R, Lay A and Das A: Electrical and mechanical offce-based neuromodulation. Urol Clin North Am. 40:581–589. 2013.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
11	Luan S, Williams I, Nikolic K and Constandinou TG: Neuromodulation: Present and emerging methods. Front Neuroeng. 7(27)2014.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
12	Park C, Choi JB, Lee YS, Chang HS, Shin CS, Kim S and Han DW: The effect of intra-operative transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on posterior neck pain following thyroidectomy. Anaesthesia. 70:434–439. 2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
13	Santana LS, Gallo RB, Ferreira CH, Duarte G, Quintana SM and Marcolin AC: Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) reduces pain and postpones the need for pharmacological analgesia during labour: A randomised trial. J Physiother. 62:29–34. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
14	Engen DJ, Carns PE, Allen MS, Bauer BA, Loehrer LL, Cha SS, Chartrand CM, Eggler EJ, Cutshall SM and Wahner-Roedler DL: Evaluating efficacy and feasibility of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for postoperative pain after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: A randomized pilot trial. Complement Ther Clin Pract. 23:141–148. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
15	Rakel BA, Zimmerman MB, Geasland K, Embree J, Clark CR, Noiseux NO, Callaghan JJ, Herr K, Walsh D and Sluka KA: Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for the control of pain during rehabilitation after total knee arthroplasty: A randomized, blinded, placebo-controlled trial. Pain. 155:2599–2611. 2014.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
16	Whitacre MM: The effect of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on ocular pain. Ophthalmic Surg. 22:462–466. 1991.PubMed/NCBI
17	Ghaffariyeh A, Peyman A, Puyan S, Honarpisheh N, Bagheri B and Peyman M: Evaluation of transcutaneous electrical simulation to improve recovery from corneal hypoesthesia after LASIK. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 247:1133–1138. 2009.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
18	Pedrotti E, Bosello F, Fasolo A, Frigo AC, Marchesoni I, Ruggeri A and Marchini G: Transcutaneous periorbital electrical stimulation in the treatment of dry eye. Br J Ophthalmol. 101:814–819. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
19	Pall ML: Electromagnetic fields act via activation of voltage-gated calcium channels to produce beneficial or adverse effects. J Cell Mol Med. 17:958–965. 2013.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
20	Amparo F, Schaumberg DA and Dana R: Comparison of two questionnaires for dry eye symptom assessment: The ocular surface disease index and the symptom assessment in dry eye. Ophthalmology. 122:1498–1503. 2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
21	Lemp MA: Report of the national eye institute/industry workshop on clinical trials in dry eyes. CLAO J. 21:221–232. 1995.PubMed/NCBI
22	Sook Chun Y and Park IK: Reliability of 4 clinical grading systems for corneal staining. Am J Ophthalmol. 157:1097–1102. 2014.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
23	Cohn GS, Corbett D, Tenen A, Coroneo M, McAlister J, Craig JP, Gray T, Kent D, Murray N, Petsoglou C, et al: Randomized, controlled, double-masked, multicenter, pilot study evaluating safety and effificacy of intranasal neurostimulation for dry eye disease. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 60:147–153. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
24	Gumus K and Pflugfelder SC: Intranasal tear neurostimulation: an emerging concept in the treatment of dry eye. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 57:101–108. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
25	Pattar GR, Jerkins G, Evans DG, Torkildsen GL, Ousle GW, Hollander DA, Holdbrook M and Senchyna M: Symptom improvement in dry eye subjects following intranasal tear neurostimulation: Results of two studies utilizing a controlled adverse environment. Ocul Surf. 18:249–257. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
26	Farhangi M, Cheng AM, Baksh B, Sarantopoulos CD, Felix ER, Levitt RC and Galor A: Effect of non-invasive intranasal neurostimulation on tear volume, dryness and ocular pain. Br J Ophthalmol. 104:1310–1316. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
27	Ozcura F, Aydin S and Helvaci MR: Ocular surface disease index for the diagnosis of dry eye syndrome. Ocul Immunol Inflamm. 15:389–393. 2007.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
28	Schiffman RM, Christianson MD, Jacobsen G, Hirsch JD and Reis BL: Reliability and validity of the ocular surface disease index. Arch Ophthalmol. 118:615–621. 2000.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
29	Chiou YF, Yeh ML and Wang YJ: Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on acupuncture points improves myofascial pain, moods, and sleep quality. Rehabil Nurs. 45:225–233. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
30	Galor A, Levitt RC, Felix ER, Martin ER and Sarantopoulos CD: Neuropathic ocular pain: An important yet underevaluated feature of dry eye. Eye (Lond). 29:301–312. 2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
31	Ainsworth L, Budelier K, Clinesmith M, Fiedler A, Landstrom R, Leeper BJ, Moeller L, Mutch S, O'Dell K, Ross J, et al: Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) reduces chronic hyperalgesia induced by muscle inflammation. Pain. 120:182–187. 2006.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
32	Grover CA, McKernan MP and Close RJH: Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) in the emergency department for painrelief: A preliminary study of feasibility and efficacy. West J Emerg Med. 19:872–876. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
33	Gozani SN: Fixed site high-frequency transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for treatment of chronic low back and lower extremity pain. J Pain Res. 9:469–479. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
34	Zhu Y, Feng Y and Peng L: Effect of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for pain control after total knee arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta analysis. J Rehabil Med. 49:700–704. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
35	Garrison DW and Foreman RD: Decreased activity of spontaneous and noxiously evoked dorsal horn cells during transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS). Pain. 58:309–315. 1994.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
36	Dieckmann G, Fregni F and Hamrah P: Neurostimulation in dry eye disease-past, present, and future. Ocul Surf. 17:20–27. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar