Open Access

Stroke secondary to giant‑cell arteritis: A literature review

  • Authors:
    • Zoltan Bajko
    • Rodica Balasa
    • Smaranda Maier
    • Anca Motataianu
    • Laura Barcutean
    • Sebastian Andone
    • Adina Stoian
    • Rares Cristian Filep
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: June 15, 2021     https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2021.10308
  • Article Number: 876
  • Copyright: © Bajko et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License.

Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

Stroke is a leading cause of death and disability worldwide. In addition to the classical etiologies of stroke as atherosclerosis and cardioembolism there are many unusual, rare causes, which require a high level of clinical suspicion and further investigations for correct and early diagnosis and adequate treatment. Giant‑cell arteritis or temporal arteritis, the most frequent vasculitis in the elderly population is one of the uncommon causes of stroke. In the setting of giant‑cell arteritis, stroke more likely affects the vertebrobasilar territory and is the main cause of mortality. Duplex ultrasound examination is a routine investigation for stroke patients and may be key to the diagnosis if the classical hypoechoic ‘halo sign’ is recognized at the level of vertebral arteries. In this situation the ultrasound evaluation of temporal arteries and temporal artery biopsy are mandatory. The Giant‑cell arteritis‑related stroke is a rare condition; therefore, there are no evidence‑based guidelines or standard recommendations for the treatment. In the present review, the main characteristics of giant‑cell arteritis-related stroke are discussed.

1. Introduction

Giant-cell arteritis (GCA) or temporal arteritis and Takayasu's arteritis are the main known examples of large-vessel vasculitis (1). GCA is the most common form of systemic vasculitis and affects both medium and large vessels, including mainly the aorta and its major subdivisions, especially the branches of the carotid arteries. GCA appears almost exclusively after the age of 50 years and its incidence increases constantly with advancing age, reaching a peak between 70 and 80 years. The lifetime risk of developing GCA was estimated at 1% in women and 0.5% in men (1,2).

Although permanent vision loss is considered to be the most feared complication of GCA, the main factors responsible for mortality in this pathology are cerebral ischemia and aortic aneurysms and dissections (3-5).

GCA is a rare cause of stroke, but it is difficult to differentiate from other, more common etiologies, such as atherosclerosis because their characteristics and risk factors are similar (6).

There are several publications in the literature, mainly small case series reporting stroke cases secondary to GCA, but there are few population-based studies, using various methodologies, making their results fairly heterogeneous (7).

Temporal artery biopsy is considered the gold-standard for the diagnosis of GCA, revealing necrotizing arteritis with a predominance of mononuclear cell infiltrations or granulomatosis with multinucleated giant cells. The classification of GCA developed by the American College of Rheumatology in 1990 includes five criteria: Age of 50 years or older, new-onset headache, temporal artery tenderness or decreased pulsation, erythrocyte sedimentation rate of at least 50 and abnormal temporal artery biopsy results. If at least three of these five criteria are present in a single case, the diagnosis can be made with a sensitivity of 93.5% and a specificity of 91.2% (8).

In the last few years duplex ultrasound has become an important tool for the diagnosis of temporal arteritis. The presence of a non-compressible, hypoechoic, mostly concentric arterial wall thickening referred to as the ‘halo’ sign is easily detectible with ultrasonography (9). The ‘halo sign’ is evidenced, not only at the level of the temporal arteries, but also at the level of the vertebral arteries and, in rare cases, at the level of the carotid arteries too. Sometimes in stroke patients, the accidentally detected halo sign at the level of the vertebral arteries during a routine cervical ultrasound examination may be the first clue for GCA (10).

The aim of the present review was to summarise the relevant literature of temporal arteritis-related stroke. A database search was performed with the following terms: ‘Stroke’, ‘temporal arteritis’ and ‘giant cell arteritis’. The majority of the relevant articles were found in PubMed. In addition, we also performed screening of Embase, CINAHL (EBSCO) and Cochrane Library databases. Articles with unavailable full text were excluded from the analysis.

Searches were limited to articles written in English.

2. Epidemiology

The majority of relevant studies proved that, GCA-related stroke mostly occurs between the onset of arteritis symptoms and one month after the initiation of steroid therapy (11).

Gonzalez-Gay et al retrospectively analysed the data of a large series of biopsy-proven GCA patients over a 27-year period of time (12). In total, 287 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria and 2.8% of these patients experienced stroke between onset of the symptoms and four weeks after the initiation of steroid therapy. The frequency of stroke was significantly higher in male patients, and the best predictors of stroke were permanent vision loss and a history of hypertension prior to the diagnosis of GCA. Furthermore, anaemia at the time of diagnosis was associated with protection against stroke (12).

Samson et al conducted a population-based study to evaluate the epidemiology of stroke patients with GCA using two prospective databases (13). They found that 7% of 57 biopsy-proven patients developed stroke. The authors explained this higher incidence relative to that of a previously reported study (12) was the consequence of their population-based search design, which allowed the inclusion both of hospitalised and non-hospitalised patients (13). In addition, they found that the main risk factors for stroke were male sex, history of vision loss, smoking, hypertension and high haemoglobin level.

Authors de Boysson et al conducted a retrospective multicentre case-control study using data from four GCA referral centres (14). The incidence of GCA-related stroke ranged from 3 to 7%, which is consistent with the findings of other authors in different geographical regions, such as Salvarani et al, with a rate of 2.7% in 180 GCA patients (11); Zenone and Puget, who reported a rate of 6.1% in 98 patients (15); and Nesher et al, who reported a rate of 7.4% in 175 patients (16).

The first systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies focused on the risk of stroke in GCA was published by Ungprasert et al (7). Those authors demonstrated a significant (1.4-fold) increase of risk of stroke in GCA cases compared with non-GCA cases (7).

3. Pathogenesis

Numerous studies investigated the genetic susceptibility in GCA, and they found a correlation with certain human leukocyte antigen (HLA) alleles, mainly the HLA-DRB1*0401 and DRB1*0404 haplotypes (17). Several non-HLA genetic loci have also been associated with genetic susceptibility to GCA, underscoring the polygenic nature of the genetic background (17).

The first step of autoimmune vascular damage is the activation of indigenous dendritic cells (DCs) in the vessel wall by an unknown trigger (e.g., environmental infectious agent, autoantigen) (18). Then, the activated DCs are enabled to present antigens, leading to the activation of cluster of differentiation (CD)4+ T-lymphocytes through major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II expression and costimulatory molecules (CD80 and CD86). DCs can control which vessels are affected as different arteries express variable combinations of Toll-like receptors (TLRs). TLRs are transmembrane proteins that play important roles in the innate immune system. They recognize molecules shared by microorganisms, danger or pathogen-associated molecular patterns released from damaged tissue (19).

After T-cell activation, CD4+ T cells and macrophages infiltrate the media and secrete proinflammatory cytokines, leading to further T-cell differentiation: T-helper (Th) 1 and Th-17 cells. Interleukin (IL)-12 and IL-18 promote Th1 differentiation and the production of interferon (IFN)-γ, which has an important role in macrophage activation and granuloma formation. Additionally, IL-6, IL-1β, IL-21 and IL-23 stimulate Th-17 differentiation, resulting in the expression of IL-17A (19), a proinflammatory cytokine, which has a pleiotropic effect on macrophages, vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs), endothelial cells (ECs) and fibroblasts as well (20,21).

Macrophages have an important role in the vasculitic process; thus, multinucleated giant cells and granulomatous infiltration are pathognomonic features in GCA-related vascular lesions. The T cells and macrophages infiltrate the arterial wall through the vasa vasorum. M1-phenotype macrophages secrete proinflammatory cytokines (IL-1, IL-6) and matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), leading to degradation of the extracellular matrix. The increased proteolytic activity secondary to the expression of MMP-2 and MMP-9 leads to disruption of the internal elastic lamina (IEL), which is the pathological hallmark of GCA. Macrophages also produce reactive oxygen species, leading to VSMCs and EC damage (17). Additionally, M2-phenotype macrophages secrete different growth factors (e.g., vascular endothelial growth factor, platelet-derived growth factor and fibroblast growth factor), leading to myofibroblast proliferation and migration towards the intima and the production of extracellular matrix proteins, provoking intimal thickening and vessel occlusion (17).

The growth factors secreted by macrophages promote angiogenesis, induce neovascularisation and amplify vascular inflammation. According to the literature, neoangiogenesis may also have a compensatory effect and it may prevent ischemia and reduce neuro-ophthalmological complications (22).

VSMCs are not only direct targets of the inflammatory attack, but they may also participate in the generation and maintenance of the pathological process. Specifically, VSMCs have the ability to secrete MMPs, leading to IEL disruption (18).

ECs, especially the micro-ECs in the vasa vasorum, also play an important role in vascular remodelling and they are major targets of inflammatory cytokines. IL-6 has important effects on EC proliferation, tubular formation and the induction of angiogenesis. ECs are themselves able to produce proinflammatory cytokines and adhesion molecules in response to paracrine signals, thus mediating leukocyte trafficking and migration (17,18).

All this complex amplification cascades and the pathological processes result in the remodelling of the vessel wall, which leads to stenosis, occlusion or aneurysm formation in the affected ateries.

4. Stroke characteristics

The majority of stroke cases secondary to GCA are ischemic stroke in nature. There are only a few isolated cases, when development of subarachnoid haemorrhage secondary to GCA was reported (23-25).

In the general population, the carotid-territory strokes are more frequent than the vertebrobasilar (VB) territory strokes; in population-based epidemiologic stroke studies their ratio was 5:1, respectively (26). However, in the active phase of the disease (between the onset of GCA symptoms and one month after the initiation of steroid therapy) the stroke cases secondary to GCA primarily developed in the VB territory. For example, Gonzalez-Gay et al reported in a population-based study including a total of 287 GCA patients that seven out of the eight stroke cases occurred in VB territory. Moreover, in six of the seven cases the patients were male (12). In a population-based cohort study published by Salvarani et al, all of the five stroke cases among a series of 180 patients with biopsy-proven GCA showed VB localisation (11). Similar results were reported by Samson et al (75% of GCA-related strokes) (13), by Pariente et al (11/18 stroke cases) (27) and by de Boysson et al (73% of cases) (14). Notably, studies, which includes all cases of stroke in GCA patients, regardless of whether it occurs in the active stage of the disease or not, tend to report higher frequency of stroke in the carotid localisation, similar to the data of the general population (28).

Elhfnawy et al prospectively screened consecutive patients with VB ischemic stroke for GCA, looking for the halo sign in the temporal and vertebral arteries (29). Among 65 consecutive VB stroke patients, two cases were identified as positive for the halo sign in both temporal arteries and at least one vertebral artery. Those authors concluded that older age, anaemia, elevated inflammatory markers and the presence of multiple VB steno-occlusive lesions could be considered red flags for GCA in patients with VB stroke (29).

García-García et al in a prospective study used ultrasound in 1,237 consecutive stroke cases to detect the halo sign (30). Five out of the 1,237 patients had fulfilled the diagnostic ultrasound criteria of GCA and the diagnosis was also confirmed with biopsy. All 5 cases presented as a VB-territory stroke. The outcome was favourable in 4 cases, while one patient died due to aspiration pneumonia. Authors of that study concluded that the recognition of the halo sign in the vertebral arteries is essential to establish a proper and early diagnosis.

GCA could lead to bilateral damage of the vertebral arteries, such as bilateral occlusion, which may result in severe stroke with a high mortality rate. Rüegg et al analysed a series of cases with bilateral vertebral artery occlusion-three out of the total number of eight were his own cases (31). The mortality rate was 75%, the mean age of onset was 69 years, with male predominance (n=5 men and n=3 women). All patients presented with new-onset headache, four patients presented with fever and the erythrocyte sedimentation rate was substantially elevated in all the cases. The extradural part of the vertebral arteries between the V2 and proximal V4 segments were affected in all the cases. In isolated cases, bilateral vertebral artery occlusion could be the initial clinical manifestation of GCA (31,32). The early diagnosis and prompt initiation of corticosteroid and antithrombotic treatment could lead to a favourable prognosis even in older patients (33).

It appeared that the intracranial arteries were spared in GCA because they contain no or little IEL, according to previous literature. By contrast, the supra-aortic arteries contain IEL from the aortic arch to the place of entry into the dura mater and it may extend 5 mm distally too (34,35). The newer literature, based on data from contrast-enhanced 3-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) demonstrated the frequent involvement of intradural arteries, mainly the internal carotid arteries (ICA). Siemonsen et al (36) in a prospective study evaluated 28 patients with suspected GCA, using an MRI protocol focused on the assessment of the intradural arteries. 3-Tesla MRI with fat-saturated pre- and postcontrast T1-weighted sequences were adapted to detect mural thickening and contrast enhancement of the vessel wall, which are considered to be the signs of mural inflammation. Ten out of 25 patients presented with vessel wall enhancement (VWE) of the intradural ICA, and all these cases were positive for GCA. Five patients presented bilateral, and four patients presented unilateral VWE of the vertebral arteries, respectively. The basilar artery did not show VWE in any of the cases. Moreover, involvement of the intradural vessels did not correlate with the intracranial steno-occlusive lesions, nor the cerebral ischemic lesions (36).

Several publications proved that the ischemic cerebrovascular events are mainly related to the stenosis or occlusion of the extradural vessels rather than to the intradural vasculitis (35,37).

There is no clear explanation for the more frequent involvement of the VB territory predominance in GCA-related strokes. The smaller diameter of the vertebral arteries relative to the carotid arteries and the higher vulnerability of these vessels to high-grade stenosis or occlusion could be a plausible explanation (34).

Small case series reported that multiple cerebral ischemic lesions secondary to GCA during the active phase of the disease could lead to multi-infarct dementia (34,38).

Carotid and vertebral artery dissections with severe cerebral ischemic complications secondary to GCA had been published in isolated case reports. The radiological distinction between the vasculitic vessel wall changes and the mural hematoma secondary to the dissection is challenging (39-43).

5. Diagnosis

The diagnosis of GCA in stroke patients may be challenging, especially if stroke is the first clinical manifestation. Anorexia, malaise, weight loss, fever, headache or arthralgia in the prior medical history of the patient may turn attention to the diagnosis of GCA, but these nonspecific symptoms could easily be overlooked in case of acute stroke. Both C-reactive protein level and the erythrocyte sedimentation rate are significantly higher in the majority of the GCA cases, but these findings are also nonspecific (13). However, duplex ultrasonography, which is a standard diagnostic tool in acute stroke, could help to establish the diagnosis of CGA.

The presence of the halo sign at the level of the cervical vessels, mainly in the vertebral arteries and less often in the carotid arteries may be the first proof of GCA. In these cases, the Doppler ultrasound examination of the superficial temporal arteries is mandatory, because the classic sonography signs, e.g., hypoechoic halo sign, compression sign, of GCA are usually present at this level in the majority of cases.

The halo sign was first described by Schmidt et al in 1995(44). The swollen vessel wall of the temporal arteries is characterised by ultrasound as a hypoechoic circumferential mural thickening localised around the lumen, with a diameter ranging from 0.3 to 0.5 mm (Fig. 1). The halo sign can be present, not only at the level of the superficial temporal arteries, but at the level of the vertebral, occipital, subclavian or axillary arteries too, and in rare cases, at the level of the carotid arteries (45). Vessel stenosis or occlusion can also be evidenced at the level of temporal arteries, but the diagnostic value of such is lower. The ultrasound examination can also help to navigate or to plan the precise localization of biopsy (44).

The other temporal arteritis related ultrasound sign is the so-called ‘compression sign’. This term refers to the continuous feature of a hypoechoic halo during the compression of the vessel lumen by the ultrasound transducer (Fig. 2). This sign has high specificity for the diagnosis (46).

The main advantages of the ultrasound examination are its non-invasive nature, fast availability, lack of radiation exposure and the possibility of simultaneous image acquisition and interpretation. Conversely, the disadvantage of this method is its operator-dependent nature, the need for high-quality equipment, the adequate probe setting and the standardisation requirement.

The so-called ‘fast-track clinics’ in Europe and in the United States with well-trained ultrasound specialists may help to initiate treatment before the appearance of severe complications (47,48).

Temporal artery biopsy remains the gold standard of the diagnosis; however, it is more time-consuming compared to ultrasonography. Moreover, false-negative results are not uncommon, due to the segmental involvement of the vessel walls. The mural edema and vessel wall enhancement were demonstrated with high-resolution contrast-enhanced MRI and MR angiography (49).

Finally, positron-emission tomography can also be useful in diagnosis in selected cases (50).

6. Treatment options

The GCA-related stroke is a rare condition; therefore, there are no evidence-based guidelines or standard recommendations for the treatment. The role of antiplatelet therapy in the prevention of severe ischemic complications of GCA is debated. Nesher et al retrospectively analysed 175 consecutive cases of GCA, and 21% of the patients got a low-dose aspirin treatment at the time of the diagnosis of GCA (51). The cranial ischemic complications were less frequent in the aspirin-treated group compared to the non-treated group. As such, authors of that study concluded that low-dose aspirin decreases the rate of visual complications and stroke in patients with GCA. A retrospective study published by Lee et al included 143 patients with GCA and the mean follow-up time was up to four years (52). They reported that the antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy significantly reduced the frequency of the cranial ischemic events compared to the non-treated group, i.e., 16.2 vs. 48%, respectively, while there was no significant difference between the two groups regarding to the haemorrhagic complications. On the other hand, two other studies failed to prove a beneficial effect of the antiplatelet therapy on the occurrence of severe visual complication or stroke in newly diagnosed GCA (11,53).

Martínez-Taboada et al published a cumulative meta-analysis based on the data of 914 GCA patients. According to their results the antithrombotic therapy applied prior to the diagnosis of GCA did not provide a protective effect against severe ischemic complications (54). However, the combined antithrombotic and corticosteroid treatment applied after the diagnosis of GCA resulted in a slightly favourable outcome.

High-dose glucocorticoids are the core therapy in patients with GCA-related severe complications and it should be instantly initiated once the diagnosis of GCA is strongly suspected. The superior efficacy of methylprednisolone pulse therapy in comparison with high-dose oral prednisone is not clearly proven, but it is widely used (14,55).

The possible beneficial effects of anticoagulant treatment are not well-documented (52), while the influence of statins on the risk reduction of cardiovascular complications of GCA was not proven. Moreover, the possible use of statins in terms of the glucocorticoid-sparing effect was not evident (55).

The spectrum of glucocorticoid-sparing agents used in GCA treatment is large, encompassing classical immunosuppressant drugs such as azathioprine, methotrexate, cyclophosphamide, cyclosporine and mycophenolate mofetil together with newer agents including tocilizumab, ustekinumab, abatacept and adalimumab (19). Some authors have recommended using immunosuppressive drugs as first-line therapy because of steroid-induced side effects and the risk of relapse (56).

7. Conclusions

Stroke is a rare but outcome-defining complication of GCA, because it is one of the leading factors, which influence the mortality and disability rates. GCA-related stroke typically develops in the VB territory and is more frequent in patients who have ophthalmic ischemic symptoms. In the context of constitutional symptoms and elevated inflammatory markers, clinicians must search for GCA in elderly stroke patients because the prompt institution of corticosteroid treatment and antithrombotic therapy may improve the prognosis. The widely available imaging modality of duplex ultrasound may easily guide the diagnosis if the suggestive halo sign is identified in the extracranial vessels. The diagnosis of this entity requires a high level of suspicion.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Authors' contributions

ZB, RB, AS and RCF conceived and designed the study; ZB, SM, RCF, AS performed the literature search and assessed the authenticity of raw data; ZB, SM, AM, LB, AS, and SA analyzed the relevant literature and wrote the manuscript; ZB, RB, RCF, AS and SA contributed to the interpretation of data and the revision of the manuscript, provided critical review for the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Patient consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

None to declare.

References

1 

Crowson CS, Matteson EL, Myasoedova E, Michet CJ, Ernste FC, Warrington KJ, Davis JM III, Hunder GG, Therneau TM and Gabriel SE: The lifetime risk of adult-onset rheumatoid arthritis and other inflammatory autoimmune rheumatic diseases. Arthritis Rheum. 63:633–639. 2011.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

2 

Gonzalez-Gay MA, Vazquez-Rodriguez TR, Lopez-Diaz MJ, Miranda-Filloy JA, Gonzalez-Juanatey C, Martin J and Llorca J: Epidemiology of giant cell arteritis and polymyalgia rheumatica. Arthritis Rheum. 61:1454–1461. 2009.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

3 

Aiello PD, Trautmann JC, McPhee TJ, Kunselman AR and Hunder GG: Visual prognosis in giant cell arteritis. Ophthalmology. 100:550–555. 1993.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

4 

Font C, Cid MC, Coll-Vinent B, López-Soto A and Grau JM: Clinical features in patients with permanent visual loss due to biopsy-proven giant cell arteritis. Br J Rheumatol. 36:251–254. 1997.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

5 

Kermani TA, Warrington KJ, Crowson CS, Ytterberg SR, Hunder GG, Gabriel SE and Matteson EL: Large-vessel involvement in giant cell arteritis: A population-based cohort study of the incidence-trends and prognosis. Ann Rheum Dis. 72:1989–1994. 2013.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

6 

Arboix A, Bechich S, Oliveres M, García-Eroles L, Massons J and Targa C: Ischemic stroke of unusual cause: Clinical features, etiology and outcome. Eur J Neurol. 8:133–139. 2001.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

7 

Ungprasert P, Wijarnpreecha K, Koster MJ, Thongprayoon C and Warrington KJ: Cerebrovascular accident in patients with giant cell arteritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 46:361–366. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

8 

Hunder GG, Bloch DA, Michel BA, Stevens MB, Arend WP, Calabrese LH, Edworthy SM, Fauci AS, Leavitt RY and Lie JT: , et al: The American College of Rheumatology 1990 criteria for the classification of giant cell arteritis. Arthritis Rheum. 33:1122–1128. 1990.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

9 

Schmidt WA: Ultrasound in the diagnosis and management of giant cell arteritis. Rheumatology (Oxford). 57 (Suppl 2):ii22–ii31. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

10 

Bajkó Z, Bălaşa R, Szatmári S, Rusu S, Moţăţăianu A and Maier S: The role of ultrasound in the diagnosis of temporal arteritis. Neurol Neurochir Pol. 49:139–143. 2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

11 

Salvarani C, Della Bella C, Cimino L, Macchioni P, Formisano D, Bajocchi G, Pipitone N, Catanoso MG, Restuccia G, Ghinoi A and Boiardi L: Risk factors for severe cranial ischemic events in an Italian population-based cohort of patients with giant cell arteritis. Rheumatology (Oxford). 48:250–253. 2009.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

12 

Gonzalez-Gay MA, Vazquez-Rodriguez TR, Gomez-Acebo I, Pego-Reigosa R, Lopez-Diaz MJ, Vazquez-Triñanes MC, Miranda-Filloy JA, Blanco R, Dierssen T, Gonzalez-Juanatey C and Llorca J: Strokes at time of disease diagnosis in a series of 287 patients with biopsy-proven giant cell arteritis. Medicine (Baltimore). 88:227–235. 2009.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

13 

Samson M, Jacquin A, Audia S, Daubail B, Devilliers H, Petrella T, Martin L, Durier J, Besancenot JF, Lorcerie B, et al: Stroke associated with giant cell arteritis: A population-based study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 86:216–221. 2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

14 

de Boysson H, Liozon E, Larivière D, Samson M, Parienti JJ, Boutemy J, Maigné G, Martin Silva N, Ly K, Touzé E, et al: Giant cell arteritis-related stroke: A retrospective multicenter case-control study. J Rheumatol. 44:297–303. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

15 

Zenone T and Puget M: Characteristics of cerebrovascular accidents at time of diagnosis in a series of 98 patients with giant cell arteritis. Rheumatol Int. 33:3017–3023. 2013.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

16 

Nesher G, Berkun Y, Mates M, Baras M, Nesher R, Rubinow A and Sonnenblick M: Risk factors for cranial ischemic complications in giant cell arteritis. Medicine (Baltimore). 83:114–122. 2004.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

17 

Koster MJ and Warrington KJ: Giant cell arteritis: Pathogenic mechanisms and new potential therapeutic targets. BMC Rheumatol. 1(2)2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

18 

Piggott K, Biousse V, Newman NJ, Goronzy JJ and Weyand CM: Vascular damage in giant cell arteritis. Autoimmunity. 42:596–604. 2009.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

19 

Harky A, Fok M, Balmforth D and Bashir M: Pathogenesis of large vessel vasculitis: Implications for disease classification and future therapies. Vasc Med. 24:79–88. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

20 

Espígol-Frigolé G, Corbera-Bellalta M, Planas-Rigol E, Lozano E, Segarra M, García-Martínez A, Prieto-González S, Hernández-Rodríguez J, Grau JM, Rahman MU and Cid MC: Increased IL-17A expression in temporal artery lesions is a predictor of sustained response to glucocorticoid treatment in patients with giant-cell arteritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 72:1481–1487. 2013.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

21 

Terrier B, Geri G, Chaara W, Allenbach Y, Rosenzwajg M, Costedoat-Chalumeau N, Fouret P, Musset L, Benveniste O, Six A, et al: Interleukin-21 modulates Th1 and Th17 responses in giant cell arteritis. Arthritis Rheum. 64:2001–2011. 2012.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

22 

Cid MC, Hernández-Rodríguez J, Esteban MJ, Cebrián M, Gho YS, Font C, Urbano-Márquez A, Grau JM and Kleinman HK: Tissue and serum angiogenic activity is associated with low prevalence of ischemic complications in patients with giant-cell arteritis. Circulation. 106:1664–1671. 2002.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

23 

Takahashi I, Takamura H, Gotoh S, Sasaki H and Ishikawa T: Giant cell arteritis with subarachnoid haemorrhage due to the rupture of inflammatory aneurysm of the posterior inferior cerebellar artery. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 138:893–894. 1996.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

24 

Dawson ET, Brown DA and Rabinstein AA: Headache, TIA and subarachnoid haemorrhage: Dissecting an unusual cause for stroke-like symptoms. BMJ Case Rep. 2017(bcr2017219927)2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

25 

Gál R, Bălaşa R, Bajkó Z, Maier S, Simu I and Bălaşa A: Lethal subarachnoid and intracerebral haemorrhage associated with temporal arteritis. A case report. J Crit Care Med (Targu Mures). 3:153–157. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

26 

Turney TM, Garraway WM and Whisnant JP: The natural history of hemispheric and brainstem infarction in Rochester, Minnesota. Stroke. 15:790–794. 1984.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

27 

Pariente A, Guédon A, Alamowitch S, Thietart S, Carrat F, Delorme S, Capron J, Cacciatore C, Soussan M, Dellal A, et al: Ischemic stroke in giant-cell arteritis: French retrospective study. J Autoimmun. 99:48–51. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

28 

Caselli RJ, Hunder GG and Whisnant JP: Neurologic disease in biopsy-proven giant cell (temporal) arteritis. Neurology. 38:352–359. 1988.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

29 

Elhfnawy AM, Elsalamawy D, Abdelraouf M, Schliesser M, Volkmann J and Fluri F: Red flags for a concomitant giant cell arteritis in patients with vertebrobasilar stroke: A cross-sectional study and systematic review. Acta Neurol Belg. 120:1389–1398. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

30 

García-García J, Ayo-Martín Ó, Argandoña-Palacios L and Segura T: Vertebral artery halo sign in patients with stroke: A key clue for the prompt diagnosis of giant cell arteritis. Stroke. 42:3287–3290. 2011.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

31 

Rüegg S, Engelter S, Jeanneret C, Hetzel A, Probst A, Steck AJ and Lyrer P: Bilateral vertebral artery occlusion resulting from giant cell arteritis: Report of 3 cases and review of the literature. Medicine (Baltimore). 82:1–12. 2003.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

32 

Säve-Söderbergh J, Malmvall BE, Andersson R and Bengtsson BA: Giant cell arteritis as a cause of death. Report of nine cases. JAMA. 255:493–496. 1986.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

33 

Bajko Z, Filep RC, Maier S, Motataianu A, Andone S and Balasa R: Bilateral vertebral artery occlusion without stroke secondary to giant cell arteritis. Acta Reumatol Port. 44:270–272. 2019.PubMed/NCBI

34 

Solans-Laqué R, Bosch-Gil JA, Molina-Catenario CA, Ortega-Aznar A, Alvarez-Sabin J and Vilardell-Tarres M: Stroke and multi-infarct dementia as presenting symptoms of giant cell arteritis: Report of 7 cases and review of the literature. Medicine (Baltimore). 87:335–344. 2008.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

35 

Wilkinson IM and Russell RW: Arteries of the head and neck in giant cell arteritis. A pathological study to show the pattern of arterial involvement. Arch Neurol. 27:378–391. 1972.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

36 

Siemonsen S, Brekenfeld C, Holst B, Kaufmann-Buehler AK, Fiehler J and Bley TA: 3T MRI reveals extra- and intracranial involvement in giant cell arteritis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 36:91–97. 2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

37 

Bogousslavsky J, Deruaz JP and Regli F: Bilateral obstruction of internal carotid artery from giant-cell arteritis and massive infarction limited to the vertebrobasilar area. Eur Neurol. 24:57–61. 1985.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

38 

Caselli RJ: Giant cell (temporal) arteritis: A treatable cause of multi-infarct dementia. Neurology. 40:753–755. 1990.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

39 

Parra J, Domingues J, Sargento-Freitas J and Santana I: Extensive intracranial involvement with multiple dissections in a case of giant cell arteritis. BMJ Case Rep. 2014(bcr2014204130)2014.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

40 

Proft F, Czihal M, Rémi J, Fesl G, Woischke C and Koops HS: Fatal spontaneous bilateral vertebral artery dissection in giant cell arteritis (GCA). J Vasc. 3(2)2017.

41 

Bajkó Z, Bălaşa R, Moţăţăianu A, Bărcuţean L, Stoian A, Stirbu N and Maier S: Malignant middle cerebral artery infarction secondary to traumatic bilateral internal carotid artery dissection. A case report. J Crit Care Med (Targu Mures). 2:135–141. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

42 

Filep RC, Bajko Z, Simu IP and Stoian A: Pseudo-dissection of the internal carotid artery in acute ischemic stroke. Acta Neurol Belg. 120:469–472. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

43 

Bajkó Z, Maier S, Moţăţăianu A, Bălaşa R, Vasiu S, Stoian A and Andone S: Stroke secondary to traumatic carotid artery injury-A case report. J Crit Care Med (Targu Mures). 4:23–28. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

44 

Schmidt WA, Kraft HE, Völker L, Vorpahl K and Gromnica-Ihle EJ: Colour Doppler sonography to diagnose temporal arteritis. Lancet. 345(866)1995.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

45 

Schmidt WA, Natusch A, Möller DE, Vorpahl K and Gromnica-Ihle E: Involvement of peripheral arteries in giant cell arteritis: A color Doppler sonography study. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 20:309–318. 2002.PubMed/NCBI

46 

Aschwanden M, Daikeler T, Kesten F, Baldi T, Benz D, Tyndall A, Imfeld S, Staub D, Hess C and Jaeger KA: Temporal artery compression sign-a novel ultrasound finding for the diagnosis of giant cell arteritis. Ultraschall Med. 34:47–50. 2013.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

47 

Schmidt WA: Role of ultrasound in the understanding and management of vasculitis. Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis. 6:39–47. 2014.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

48 

Baig IF, Pascoe AR, Kini A and Lee AG: Giant cell arteritis: Early diagnosis is key. Eye Brain. 11:1–12. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

49 

Bley TA, Wieben O, Uhl M, Thiel J, Schmidt D and Langer M: High-resolution MRI in giant cell arteritis: Imaging of the wall of the superficial temporal artery. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 184:283–287. 2005.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

50 

Pelletier-Galarneau M and Ruddy TD: PET/CT for diagnosis and management of large-vessel vasculitis. Curr Cardiol Rep. 21(34)2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

51 

Nesher G, Berkun Y, Mates M, Baras M, Rubinow A and Sonnenblick M: Low-dose aspirin and prevention of cranial ischemic complications in giant cell arteritis. Arthritis Rheum. 50:1332–1337. 2004.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

52 

Lee MS, Smith SD, Galor A and Hoffman GS: Antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapy in patients with giant cell arteritis. Arthritis Rheum. 54:3306–3309. 2006.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

53 

Narváez J, Bernad B, Gómez-Vaquero C, García-Gómez C, Roig-Vilaseca D, Juanola X, Rodriguez-Moreno J, Nolla JM and Valverde J: Impact of antiplatelet therapy in the development of severe ischemic complications and in the outcome of patients with giant cell arteritis. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 26:S57–S62. 2008.PubMed/NCBI

54 

Martínez-Taboada VM, López-Hoyos M, Narvaez J and Muñoz-Cacho P: Effect of antiplatelet/anticoagulant therapy on severe ischemic complications in patients with giant cell arteritis: A cumulative meta-analysis. Autoimmun Rev. 13:788–794. 2014.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

55 

Bienvenu B, Ly KH, Lambert M, Agard C, André M, Benhamou Y, Bonnotte B, de Boysson H, Espitia O, Fau G, et al: Management of giant cell arteritis: Recommendations of the French study group for large vessel vasculitis (GEFA). Rev Med Interne. 37:154–165. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

56 

Larivière D, Sacre K, Klein I, Hyafil F, Choudat L, Chauveheid MP and Papo T: Extra- and intracranial cerebral vasculitis in giant cell arteritis: An observational study. Medicine (Baltimore). 93(e265)2014.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

Related Articles

Journal Cover

August-2021
Volume 22 Issue 2

Print ISSN: 1792-0981
Online ISSN:1792-1015

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Bajko Z, Balasa R, Maier S, Motataianu A, Barcutean L, Andone S, Stoian A and Filep RC: Stroke secondary to giant‑cell arteritis: A literature review. Exp Ther Med 22: 876, 2021
APA
Bajko, Z., Balasa, R., Maier, S., Motataianu, A., Barcutean, L., Andone, S. ... Filep, R.C. (2021). Stroke secondary to giant‑cell arteritis: A literature review. Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine, 22, 876. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2021.10308
MLA
Bajko, Z., Balasa, R., Maier, S., Motataianu, A., Barcutean, L., Andone, S., Stoian, A., Filep, R. C."Stroke secondary to giant‑cell arteritis: A literature review". Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine 22.2 (2021): 876.
Chicago
Bajko, Z., Balasa, R., Maier, S., Motataianu, A., Barcutean, L., Andone, S., Stoian, A., Filep, R. C."Stroke secondary to giant‑cell arteritis: A literature review". Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine 22, no. 2 (2021): 876. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2021.10308