Open Access

Podofilox suppresses gastric cancer cell proliferation by regulating cell cycle arrest and the c‑Myc/ATG10 axis

  • Authors:
    • Juan An
    • Yan Liu
    • Shenglan Duo
    • Xiaoming Ma
    • Ling An
    • Yunfei Yan
    • Dongde Ji
    • Yupeng Yan
    • Qiliang Cheng
    • Zhanhai Su
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: August 23, 2021
  • Article Number: 1203
  • Copyright: © An et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License.

Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Gastric cancer (GC) is a malignancy for which effective therapeutic drugs are limited. Podofilox exhibits antitumor effects in various types of cancer; however, whether it may inhibit GC growth remains unknown. The aim of the present study was to investigate the role of podofilox in GC. Cell Counting Kit‑8, colony formation and cell cycle assays were used to detect the role of podofilox on cellular proliferation and the cell cycle, respectively. A microarray was used to detect the transcriptional changes induced by podofilox in GC cells. The results of the present study demonstrated that podofilox inhibited GC cell proliferation and colony formation. The half maximal inhibitory concentration of podofilox in AGS and HGC‑27 cells was 2.327 and 1.981 nM, respectively. In addition, treatment with podofilox induced G0/G1 cell cycle arrest. Molecular analysis based on microarray data demonstrated that podofilox altered the expression levels of genes involved in the cell cycle, c‑Myc and p53 signaling. Autophagy‑related 10 (ATG10), which was highly expressed in GC tissues, was also downregulated by podofilox, as demonstrated by the results of the microarray analysis and immunoblotting. To determine the involvement of ATG10 in GC, ATG10 was knocked down in GC cells by small interfering RNA, which suppressed the proliferation and colony formation of GC cells compared with those observed in the control‑transfected cells. Taken together, the results of the present study suggested that podofilox may inhibit GC cell proliferation by preventing the cell cycle progression and regulating the c‑Myc/ATG10 signaling pathway.


Gastric cancer (GC) is one of the most common cancer types, which originates from the gastric mucosa, neuroendocrine, lymphoid or connective tissue of the gastric wall (1). Helicobacter pylori infection (1,2), cigarette smoking (3), alcohol (4) and genetic syndromes (5) are common risk factors for GC. Surgical resection is the optimal therapeutic option for GC. Increasing evidence has demonstrated that genetic variants, such as those in p53, adenomatous polyposis coli and human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER-2), contribute to the development of GC (6,7). Targeted therapies against HER-2 have been applied for the treatment of GC patients with HER-2 amplification (8). However, there is still a demand to identify novel biomarkers and triggers of GC progression.

Podofilox, which is isolated from the North American plant Podophyllum peltatum L., belongs to the lignan family, and one of its derivatives is a potential antitumor factor (9). This natural product has also been isolated from Podophyllum emodi (9). According to previous studies, podofilox derivatives exhibit inhibitory effects on the proliferation and growth of various types of cancer. For example, XWL-1-48, a novel podofilox derivative, induces apoptosis and suppresses cell proliferation in breast cancer (10). Another derivative, 4β-NH-(benzo heterocycles)-4-desoxy-podofilox, exhibits anticancer effects by improving tubulin binding affinity in MCF-7, A549 and HeLa cells (11).

Currently, the effects of podofilox and its potential underlying molecular mechanism of action in GC remain unclear. In this context, the present study aimed to investigate whether podofilox may exert an anticancer effect in GC, and the potential molecular mechanisms therein.

Materials and methods

The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) data analysis

For the analysis of public data, 375 GC tissue and non-cancer tissues were analyzed using a dataset from (TCGA) database (

Cell lines and culture

The human GC cell lines AGS and HGC-27 were purchased from the American Type Culture Collection and maintained according to the supplier's instructions. Cells were maintained in DMEM supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) and 1% penicillin/streptomycin at 37˚C with 5% CO2.

IC50 measurement

The IC50 of podofilox was determined using the Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8; Shanghai Yeasen Biotechnology Co., Ltd.) assay. GC cells were seeded into 96-well plates in triplicate at a density of 2,000 cells per well and treated with various concentrations (0, 0.3125, 0.625, 1.25, 2.5, 5, 10, 20, 40 and 80 nM; dissolved in DMSO) of podofilox (cat. no. S18-28-5; MedChemExpress). The plates were maintained at 37˚C with 5% CO2. The CCK-8 assay was subsequently performed to assess cell viability after 48 h. The culture medium was removed, and 100 µl culture medium was added to each well with 10 µl Cell CCK-8 reagent (Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology). After incubation for 3 h at room temperature, cell viability was analyzed by measuring the OD at 450 nm, using a microplate reader (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.).

ATG10 interference

Small interfering (si)RNAs against ATG10 (siATG10)-1 (5'-GAGUUCAUGAGUGCUAUAAGA-3') and siATG10-2 (5'-GCAACAGGAACAUCCAAUACU-3') and a control siRNA (siCtrl; 5'-UUCUCCGAACGUGUCACGU-3') were synthesized by Huzhou Hippo Biotechnology Co., Ltd. A total of 3x105 cells were seeded in 6-well plates and transfected with siRNAs (50 nM/well) using Lipofectamine® RNAiMAX reagent (4 µl/well; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) for 48 h at 37˚C, according to the manufacturer's protocol. At 48 h post-transfection, knockdown efficacy was determined by western blotting and the cells were subjected to cell function experiments.

Cell viability assay

A total of 2x103/well AGS and HGC-27 cells were seeded into 96-well plates containing 100 µl DMEM (10% FBS) and treated with 3.4 nM podofilox at 37˚C for 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 days. CCK-8 reagent (10%) was subsequently added to each well and cellular proliferation was analyzed at a wavelength of 450 nm after incubation for 3 h at 37˚C.

Colony formation assay

AGS and HGC-27 cells were seeded at a density of 1,000 cells/well and incubated at 37˚C (5% CO2) with vehicle or 3.4 nM podofilox. The culture medium, vehicle and podofilox were changed every 2 days. After 7 days, the colonies were washed with PBS, fixed with 100% methanol at room temperature for 15 min, and then stained with 0.2% crystal violet solution at room temperature for 30 min. Images were captured using a camera (Nikon Corporation), and cell colonies >50 cells were counted manually.

Western blotting

AGS and HGC-27 cells treated with or without podofilox were lysed using a lysis buffer (Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology). The concentration of total protein was detected using a BCA Protein Assay Kit. Proteins (30 µg) were separated by SDS-PAGE (12%), transferred on PVDF membranes (MilliporeSigma) and blocked with non-fat milk at room temperature for 1 h. The membranes were incubated with primary antibodies against hexokinase-2 (HK2; cat. no. 2867; Cell Signaling Technology, Inc.), pyruvate kinase M1/2 (PKM2; cat. no. 4053; Cell Signaling Technology, Inc.), ATG10 (cat. no. ab124711; Abcam), p53 (cat. no. sc-126; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.), c-Myc (cat. no. sc-40; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.) and GAPDH (cat. no. sc-47724; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.) at 4˚C overnight. Following primary antibody incubation, the membranes were washed with TBST (0.1% Tween) three times at room temperature, and incubated with secondary antibodies (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc. both 1:10,000; normal mouse IgG, cat. no. sc-2748; and normal rat IgG, cat. no. sc-2750) at room temperature for 3 h. Protein bands were visualized using SuperSignal™ West Pico PLUS Chemiluminescent Substrate (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). The western blot bands were quantified using ImageJ software (v1.8.0).

Cell cycle analysis

AGS and HGC-27 cells (1x105) were seeded and incubated with vehicle or podofilox (3.4 nM) for 48 h. The cells were collected and incubated with 70% iced ethanol overnight. Cell cycle distribution was assessed using the propidium iodide (Shanghai Yeasen Biotechnology Co., Ltd.) staining kit, according to the manufacturers' protocols, and analyzed via flow cytometry.

Microarray analysis

Total RNA was extracted from AGS cells treated with vehicle or podofilox (3.4 nM) using TRIzol® reagent (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) according to the manufacturer's protocol. The quality and quantity of the RNA were determined using NanoDrop 2000. PrimeView Human Gene Expression Array (Affymetrix, cat. no. 902487) was used to profile gene expression. The following criteria were used to determine statistical significance: P<0.05 and fold-change >1.3. The Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) and HALLMARK databases were used to perform pathway enrichment analyses (12).

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad prism 8.0 software (GraphPad Software, Inc.). All experiments were performed in triplicate and data are presented as the mean ± standard error of the mean. Student's t-test was used to compare differences between two groups, whereas one way ANOVA followed by Tukey's post hoc test were used to compare differences among multiple groups. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.


Podofilox effectively inhibits cell proliferation

To study the effects of podofilox in GC cells, the IC50 of podofilox was determined. AGS and HGC-27 cells were treated with various concentrations of podofilox ranging between 0 and 80 nM, and the cell viability was determined at 48 h post-treatment. The results demonstrated that 50% of AGS and HGC-27 cells died following incubation with 3.409 and 3.394 nM podofilox, respectively (Fig. 1A and B). Subsequently, the present study investigated whether podofilox exhibited a time-dependent inhibitory effect on cell proliferation. GC cells were incubated with vehicle or 3.4 nM podofilox. Cell viability was analyzed between days 1 and 5. The results of the CCK-8 assay demonstrated that 3.4 nM podofilox significantly suppressed cell proliferation compared with that observed in the vehicle-treated cells (Fig. 1C and D). Consistent with these results, cell colony formation was inhibited following treatment with podofilox (Fig. 2A and B). Taken together, these results suggested that podofilox effectively suppressed the proliferation and GC cells for 5 days.

Podofilox inhibits cell cycle progression

Next, the cell cycle was analyzed following treatment with vehicle or podofilox by PI staining and flow cytometric analysis. As presented in Fig. 3A and B, treatment with podofilox significantly increased the numbers of AGS and HGC-27 cells in the non-proliferative G0/G1 phase. These results suggested that podofilox promoted cell cycle arrest.

Molecular changes following treatment with podofilox

To determine the molecular mechanisms underlying the inhibitory effects of podofilox in GC, the cells were treated with vehicle and podofilox for 48 h, and total RNA was extracted for microarray analysis. A total of 566 upregulated and 713 downregulated genes were identified following treatment with podofilox (Fig. 4A and Table S1). The expression levels of ATG10, an autophagy-related gene, were suppressed by podofilox treatment compared with those detected in the vehicle control group. Based on pathway enrichment analysis, ‘KEGG_cell_cycle’ and ‘Hallmark_MYC_Targets_v1’ pathways were also suppressed by podofilox, while ‘Hallmark_p53_Pathway’ was activated by podofilox (Fig. 4B).

To validate the microarray results, western blot analysis was performed, and the results demonstrated that compared with the protein levels in the vehicle control group, podofilox downregulated the protein expression levels of HK2, PKM2, c-Myc and ATG10, and upregulated those of p53 (Fig. 5). Taken together, these results suggested that podofilox may suppress the cell cycle and the c-Myc/ATG10 axis, and activate p53.

ATG10 knockdown inhibits cell proliferation

The role of ATG10 in cell proliferation was subsequently investigated. The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database revealed that ATG10 was upregulated in GC samples compared with adjacent non-cancerous tissue (Fig. 6A). To determine the function of ATG10 in GC, ATG10 was silenced in GC cells, and proliferation was assessed by CCK-8 assay. Western blot analysis was performed to assess the transfection efficiency (Fig. 6B). The results demonstrated that ATG10 knockdown decreased the proliferation of HGC-27 cells compared with those in cells transfected with siCtrl (Fig. 6C). In AGS cells, ATG10 interference by siATG10-1 exhibited notable inhibition; however, siATG10-2 had a marginal inhibitory effect on the proliferation of AGS cells compared with that in the control group (Fig. 6D). The results of the colony formation assay demonstrated that both siRNAs targeting ATG10 significantly suppressed colony formation in GC cells (Fig. 6E and F). Thus, ATG10 may act as an oncogene in GC.


Advanced GC is an incurable malignancy as the current therapeutic strategies, including surgery, targeted therapies and immunotherapy, are ineffective against this disease (13). Despite recent advances, the prognosis of patients with GC remains poor (768,793 new deaths in 2020), and effective treatment is limited (14). The results of the present study demonstrated that podofilox significantly suppressed the proliferative ability of GC cells. In addition, cell cycle arrest was induced by podofilox at the G0/G1 phase. Taken together, these results suggested that podofilox may be used as a therapeutic drug for the treatment of GC.

Podofilox, also termed podophyllotoxin, exhibits an antiviral function against herpes viruses, warts and influenza, as well as antitumor effects (15,16). According to previous studies, its derivatives are widely used in different types of cancer. For example, dendrimer-conjugated podophyllotoxin suppresses the development of chemical-induced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in mice (17). In another study, 14 biotinylated podophyllotoxin derivatives were designed and synthesized, which exhibited potent cytotoxic effects against a number of cancer cell lines, such as H1299 and H1975(18). Furthermore, the 4β-acetamidobenzofuranone-podophyllotoxin hybrids exhibit anticancer effects in various types of cancer cells, such as breast, lung and prostate cancer (19). The results of the present study demonstrated that podofilox exhibited anticancer effects against GC cells. The IC50 of podofilox in AGS and HGC-27 cells was 3.409 and 3.394 nM, respectively. Treatment with 3.4 nM podofilox notably suppressed cell proliferation and colony formation compared with those observed in the vehicle control groups. Collectively, these results suggested that podofilox may be a promising drug against GC. Podofilox has been reported to disrupt the microtubules and inhibit cell cycle progression at the G1 phase (20). In addition, deoxypodophyllotoxin suppresses the cell cycle progression and promotes apoptosis in human glioma (21). Consistent with these findings, the results of the present study demonstrated that podofilox promoted cell cycle arrest at the G0/G1 phase in GC cells. Thus, podofilox may induce G0/G1 cell cycle arrest in various types of cancer cells. However, these results were insufficient to conclude whether cell cycle arrest may be a general function of the drug or if it may be cell line-specific. This should be investigated in other cancer cell lines in the future.

The molecular basis by which podofilox inhibits cancer cell proliferation and tumor growth has been investigated in previous studies. For example, podofilox inhibits HCCLM3 and HepG2 cell proliferation and migration by inactivating the PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling pathway (22). In HCC cells, podofilox inhibits the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway and activates p53(23). However, the molecular mechanisms underlying the effects of podofilox in GC remain unknown. Thus, microarray analysis was performed in the present study to determine the dysregulated genes following treatment with podofilox. A total of 1,279 genes were dysregulated in podofilox-treated AGS cells, including 566 upregulated and 713 downregulated genes. KEGG and HALLMARK pathway enrichment analyses demonstrated that the cell cycle and the c-Myc pathway were inhibited by podofilox. By contrast, the p53 signaling pathway was activated by podofilox. Western blot analysis confirmed that the protein expression levels of c-Myc and ATG10 were downregulated in GC cells following treatment with podofilox compared with those in vehicle-treated cells. The levels of glycolysis hallmark genes HK2 and PKM2, which are frequently upregulated in cancers (24), were downregulated by podofilox compared with those in the control groups. A previously study demonstrated that ATG10 was a downstream effector of c-Myc (25). Notably, ATG10 was upregulated in GC compared with normal tissues in samples from TCGA database.

The podophyllotoxin-indirubin hybrid termed Da-1 suppresses the proliferation of leukemia cells and induces autophagy (26). The autophagy-inducing effect of podophyllotoxin has also been demonstrated in HCC cells (27). Since c-Myc signaling and its downstream effector ATG10 were both inhibited by podofilox in the present study, the involvement of ATG10 in GC cell proliferation was subsequently assessed. ATG10 was silenced in GC cells by siRNA, and the results of the CCK-8 and colony formation assays demonstrated that ATG10 knockdown significantly suppressed the proliferation of HGC-27 and AGS cells. Taken together, these results suggested that ATG10 may act as an oncogene in GC, and podofilox may suppress the proliferation of GC cells by downregulating ATG10.

In conclusion, the results of the present study demonstrated the antitumor effects of podofilox in GC. The cell cycle was arrested by podofilox at the G0/G1 phase, whereas apoptosis was unaffected. In addition, podofilox induced autophagy by regulating ATG10.

Supplementary Material

List of dysregulated genes in microarray analysis.


Not applicable.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the present study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request. The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are available in the Gene Expression Omnibus repository, under the accession number GSE172408.

Authors' contributions

JA and ZS conceived the present study, performed the experiments and prepared the manuscript. YL and SD performed the cell cycle analysis. XM and LA performed the western blot analysis. Yun Y, DJ and Yup Y performed the microarray analysis. QC performed the colony formation assay. JA and ZS wrote and revised the manuscript draft. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. JA and ZS confirmed the authenticity of all the raw data.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Patient consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.



Joshi S and Badgwell B: Current treatment and recent progress in gastric cancer. CA Cancer J Clin. 71:264–279. 2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar


Ajani J, Lee J, Sano T, Janjigian Y, Fan D and Song S: Gastric adenocarcinoma. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 3(17036)2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar


Wang LY, Zhao S, Lv GJ, Ma XJ and Zhang JB: Mechanisms of resveratrol in the prevention and treatment of gastrointestinal cancer. World J Clin Cases. 8:2425–2437. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar


Deng W, Jin L, Zhuo H, Vasiliou V and Zhang Y: Alcohol consumption and risk of stomach cancer: A meta-analysis. Chem Biol Interact. 336(109365)2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar


Lerner B and Llor X: Genetic gastric cancer risk syndromes. Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol. 18:604–615. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar


Huang K, Ramnarayanan K, Zhu F, Srivastava S, Xu C, Tan ALK, Lee M, Tay S, Das K, Xing M, et al: Genomic and epigenomic profiling of high-risk intestinal metaplasia reveals molecular determinants of progression to gastric cancer. Cancer Cell. 33:137–150.e5. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar


Machlowska J, Baj J, Sitarz M, Maciejewski R and Sitarz R: Gastric Cancer: Epidemiology, risk factors, classification, genomic characteristics and treatment strategies. Int J Mol Sci. 21(4012)2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar


Shitara K, Bang Y, Iwasa S, Sugimoto N, Ryu MH, Sakai D, Chung HC, Kawakami H, Yabusaki H, Lee J, et al: Trastuzumab deruxtecan in previously treated HER2-positive gastric cancer. N Engl J Med. 382:2419–2430. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar


Liu YQ, Tian J, Qian K, Zhao XB, Morris-Natschke SL, Yang L, Nan X, Tian X and Lee KH: Recent progress on C-4-modified podophyllotoxin analogs as potent antitumor agents. Med Res Rev. 35:1–62. 2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar


Wang Y, Sun H, Xiao Z, Zhang G, Zhang D, Bao X, Li F, Wu S, Gao Y and Wei N: DNA damage and apoptosis induced by a potent orally podophyllotoxin derivative in breast cancer. Cell Commun Signal. 16(52)2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar


Zhao W, He L, Xiang TL and Tang YJ: Discover 4β-NH-(6-aminoindole)-4-desoxy-podophyllotoxin with nanomolar-potency antitumor activity by improving the tubulin binding affinity on the basis of a potential binding site nearby colchicine domain. Eur J Med Chem. 170:73–86. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar


Yu G, Wang LG, Han Y and He QY: clusterProfiler: An R package for comparing biological themes among gene clusters. OMICS. 16:284–287. 2012.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar


Smyth E, Nilsson M, Grabsch H, van Grieken N and Lordick F: Gastric cancer. Lancet. 396:635–648. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar


Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A and Bray F: Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 71:209–249. 2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar


Zhao W, Cong Y, Li H, Li S, Shen Y, Qi Q, Zhang Y, Li YZ and Tang YJ: Challenges and potential for improving the druggability of podophyllotoxin-derived drugs in cancer chemotherapy. Nat Prod Rep. 38:470–488. 2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar


Cohen T, Schwarz T, Vigant F, Gardner T, Hernandez R, Lee B and Tortorella D: The microtubule inhibitor podofilox inhibits an early entry step of human cytomegalovirus. Viruses. 8(295)2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar


Tracz-Gaszewska Z and Dobrzyn P: Stearoyl-CoA desaturase 1 as a therapeutic target for the treatment of cancer. Cancers (Basel). 11(948)2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar


Zi CT, Gao YS, Yang L, Feng SY, Huang Y, Sun L, Jin Y, Xu FQ, Dong FW, Li Y, et al: Design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of novel biotinylated podophyllotoxin derivatives as potential antitumor agents. Front Chem. 7(434)2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar


Paidakula S, Nerella S, Vadde R, Kamal A and Kankala S: Design and synthesis of 4β-Acetamidobenzofuranone-podophyllotoxin hybrids and their anti-cancer evaluation. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 29:2153–2156. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar


Hao SY, Feng SL, Wang XR, Wang Z, Chen SW and Hui L: Novel conjugates of podophyllotoxin and coumarin: Synthesis, cytotoxicities, cell cycle arrest, binding CT DNA and inhibition of Topo IIβ. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 29:2129–2135. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar


Wang W, Gao W, Zhang L, Zhang D, Zhao Z and Bao Y: Deoxypodophyllotoxin inhibits cell viability and invasion by blocking the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway in human glioblastoma cells. Oncol Rep. 41:2453–2463. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar


Li Y, Huang T, Fu Y, Wang T, Zhao T, Guo S, Sun Y, Yang Y and Li C: Antitumor activity of a novel dual functional podophyllotoxin derivative involved PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway. PLoS One. 14(e0215886)2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar


Li Y, Wang T, Sun Y, Huang T and Li C, Fu Y, Li Y and Li C: p53-mediated PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway played a role in ptox-induced EMT inhibition in liver cancer cell lines. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2019(2531493)2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar


Guo W, Qiu Z, Wang Z, Wang Q, Tan N, Chen T, Chen Z, Huang S, Gu J, Li J, et al: MiR-199a-5p is negatively associated with malignancies and regulates glycolysis and lactate production by targeting hexokinase 2 in liver cancer. Hepatology. 62:1132–1144. 2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar


Sun W, Li J, Zhou L, Han J, Liu R, Zhang H, Ning T, Gao Z, Liu B, Chen X and Ba Y: The c-Myc/miR-27b-3p/ATG10 regulatory axis regulates chemoresistance in colorectal cancer. Theranostics. 10:1981–1996. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar


Wang J, Long L, Chen Y, Xu Y and Zhang L: Design, synthesis and antineoplastic activity of novel hybrids of podophyllotoxin and indirubin against human leukaemia cancer cells as multifunctional anti-MDR agents. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 28:1817–1824. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar


Ren J, Liu Y, Li L, Zhao Y, Li Z, Wu C, Chen L and Hu K: OAMDP, a novel podophyllotoxin derivative, induces apoptosis, cell cycle arrest and autophagy in hepatoma HepG2 cells. Cell Biol Int. 42:194–204. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

Related Articles

Journal Cover

Volume 22 Issue 5

Print ISSN: 1792-0981
Online ISSN:1792-1015

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
Spandidos Publications style
An J, Liu Y, Duo S, Ma X, An L, Yan Y, Ji D, Yan Y, Cheng Q, Su Z, Su Z, et al: Podofilox suppresses gastric cancer cell proliferation by regulating cell cycle arrest and the c‑Myc/ATG10 axis. Exp Ther Med 22: 1203, 2021
An, J., Liu, Y., Duo, S., Ma, X., An, L., Yan, Y. ... Su, Z. (2021). Podofilox suppresses gastric cancer cell proliferation by regulating cell cycle arrest and the c‑Myc/ATG10 axis. Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine, 22, 1203.
An, J., Liu, Y., Duo, S., Ma, X., An, L., Yan, Y., Ji, D., Yan, Y., Cheng, Q., Su, Z."Podofilox suppresses gastric cancer cell proliferation by regulating cell cycle arrest and the c‑Myc/ATG10 axis". Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine 22.5 (2021): 1203.
An, J., Liu, Y., Duo, S., Ma, X., An, L., Yan, Y., Ji, D., Yan, Y., Cheng, Q., Su, Z."Podofilox suppresses gastric cancer cell proliferation by regulating cell cycle arrest and the c‑Myc/ATG10 axis". Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine 22, no. 5 (2021): 1203.