|
1
|
Zeng J, Duan Y, Yang Y, Wang B, Hong Y,
Lou J, Ning N and Liu H: Anterior corpectomy and reconstruction
using dynamic cervical plate and titanium mesh cage for cervical
spondylotic myelopathy: A minimum 5-year follow-up study. Medicine
(Baltimore). 97(e9724)2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
2
|
Fengbin Y, Jinhao M, Xinyuan L, Xinwei W,
Yu C and Deyu C: Evaluation of a new type of titanium mesh cage
versus the traditional titanium mesh cage for single-level,
anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion. Eur Spine J. 22:2891–2896.
2013.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
3
|
Yan D, Wang Z, Deng S, Li J and Soo C:
Anterior corpectomy and reconstruction with titanium mesh cage and
dynamic cervical plate for cervical spondylotic myelopathy in
elderly osteoporosis patients. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg.
131:1369–1374. 2011.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
4
|
Wu J, Luo D, Ye X, Luo X, Yan L and Qian
H: Anatomy-related risk factors for the subsidence of titanium mesh
cage in cervical reconstruction after one-level corpectomy. Int J
Clin Exp Med. 8:7405–7411. 2015.PubMed/NCBI
|
|
5
|
Weber MH, Fortin M, Shen J, Tay B, Hu SS,
Berven S, Burch S, Chou D, Ames C and Deviren V: Graft subsidence
and revision rates following anterior cervical corpectomy: A
clinical study comparing different interbody cages. Clin Spine
Surg. 30:E1239–E1245. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
6
|
Jang JW, Lee JK, Lee JH, Hur H, Kim TW and
Kim SH: Effect of posterior subsidence on cervical alignment after
anterior cervical corpectomy and reconstruction using titanium mesh
cages in degenerative cervical disease. J Clin Neurosci.
21:1779–1785. 2014.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
7
|
Chen Y, Chen D, Guo Y, Wang X, Lu X, He Z
and Yuan W: Subsidence of titanium mesh cage: A study based on 300
cases. J Spinal Disord Tech. 21:489–492. 2008.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
8
|
Hartmann S, Kavakebi P, Wipplinger C,
Tschugg A, Girod PP, Lener S and Thomé C: Retrospective analysis of
cervical corpectomies: Implant-related complications of one- and
two-level corpectomies in 45 patients. Neurosurg Rev. 41:285–290.
2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
9
|
Lu T, Liu C, Yang B, Liu J, Zhang F, Wang
D, Li H and He X: Single-level anterior cervical corpectomy and
fusion using a new 3D-printed anatomy-adaptive titanium mesh cage
for treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy and ossification
of the posterior longitudinal ligament: A retrospective case series
study. Med Sci Monit. 23:3105–3114. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
10
|
Lou J, Liu H, Rong X, Li H, Wang B and
Gong Q: Geometry of inferior endplates of the cervical spine. Clin
Neurol Neurosurg. 142:132–136. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
11
|
Ordway NR, Rim BC, Tan R, Hickman R and
Fayyazi AH: Anterior cervical interbody constructs: Effect of a
repetitive compressive force on the endplate. J Orthop Res.
30:587–592. 2012.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
12
|
Lowe TG, Hashim S, Wilson LA, O'Brien MF,
Smith DA, Diekmann MJ and Trommeter J: A biomechanical study of
regional endplate strength and cage morphology as it relates to
structural interbody support. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 29:2389–2394.
2004.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
13
|
Hasegawa K, Abe M, Washio T and Hara T: An
experimental study on the interface strength between titanium mesh
cage and vertebra in reference to vertebral bone mineral density.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 26:957–963. 2001.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
14
|
Brenke C, Fischer S, Carolus A, Schmieder
K and Ening G: Complications associated with cervical vertebral
body replacement with expandable titanium cages. J Clin Neurosci.
32:35–40. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
15
|
Tarantino R, Nigro L, Donnarumma P, Rullo
M, Santoro A and Delfini R: Cervical reconstruction techniques.
After adequate selection of the patient report of a series of 34
patients treated with winged expandable cages. Neurosurg Rev.
40:281–286. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
16
|
Chen H, Zhong J, Tan J, Wu D and Jiang D:
Sagittal geometry of the middle and lower cervical endplates. Eur
Spine J. 22:1570–1575. 2013.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
17
|
Ordway NR, Lu YM, Zhang X, Cheng CC, Fang
H and Fayyazi AH: Correlation of cervical endplate strength with CT
measured subchondral bone density. Eur Spine J. 16:2104–2109.
2007.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
18
|
Lu T, Liang H, Liu C, Guo S, Zhang T, Yang
B and He X: Effects of titanium mesh cage end structures on the
compressive load at the endplate interface: A cadaveric
biomechanical study. Med Sci Monit. 23:2863–2870. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
19
|
Feng H, Fang X, Huang D, Yu C, Zhao S and
Hao D: Quantitative morphometric study of the subaxial cervical
vertebrae end plate. Spine J. 17:269–276. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
20
|
Feng H, Fang XY, Huang DG, Yu CC, Li HK,
Zhao SC, Ge CY, Bai RH and Hao DJ: A morphometric study of the
middle and lower cervical vertebral endplates and their components.
Medicine (Baltimore). 96(e6296)2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
21
|
Zhao S, Hao D, Jiang Y, Huang D, Ge C and
Feng H: Morphological studies of cartilage endplates in subaxial
cervical region. Eur Spine J. 25:2218–2222. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
22
|
Schmitz B, Pitzen T, Beuter T, Steudel WI
and Reith W: Regional variations in the thickness of cervical spine
endplates as measured by computed tomography. Acta Radiol.
45:53–58. 2004.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
23
|
Pitzen T, Schmitz B, Georg T, Barbier D,
Beuter T, Steudel WI and Reith W: Variation of endplate thickness
in the cervical spine. Eur Spine J. 13:235–240. 2004.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
24
|
Cheng CC, Ordway NR, Zhang X, Lu YM, Fang
H and Fayyazi AH: Loss of cervical endplate integrity following
minimal surface preparation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 32:1852–1855.
2007.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
25
|
van der Houwen EB, Baron P, Veldhuizen AG,
Burgerhof JG, van Ooijen PM and Verkerke GJ: Geometry of the
intervertebral volume and vertebral endplates of the human spine.
Ann Biomed Eng. 38:33–40. 2010.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
26
|
Steffen T, Tsantrizos A and Aebi M: Effect
of implant design and endplate preparation on the compressive
strength of interbody fusion constructs. Spine (Phila Pa 1976).
25:1077–1084. 2000.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
