Differential gene expression profiles in spontaneously hypertensive rats induced by administration of enalapril and nifedipine

  • Authors:
    • Ki-Mo Lee
    • Haeng-A Kang
    • Chang-Bo Ko
    • Eun-Ha Oh
    • Min Park
    • Hwa-Youn Lee
    • Ha‑Rim Choi
    • Chul-Ho Yun
    • Woon-Won Jung
    • Jae-Wook Oh
    • Hyung-Sik Kang
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: November 15, 2012     https://doi.org/10.3892/ijmm.2012.1183
  • Pages: 179-187
Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

Enalapril and nifedipine are used as antihypertensive drugs; however, the therapeutic target molecules regulated by enalapril and nifedipine have yet to be fully identified. The aim of this study was to identify novel target genes that are specifically regulated by enalapril and nifedipine in tissues from spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR) using DNA microarray analysis. We found that administration of SHR with enalapril and nifedipine differentially regulated 33 genes involved in the pathogenesis of cardiovascular diseases. Furthermore, we identified 16 genes that have not previously been implicated in cardiovascular diseases, including interleukin-24 (IL-24). Among them, exogenous administration of IL-24 attenuated the expression of vascular inflammation and hypertension-related genes induced by H2O2 treatment in mouse vascular smooth muscle (MOVAS) cells. This study provides valuable information for the development of novel antihypertensive drugs. In addition, the genes identified may be of use as biomarkers and therapeutic targets for cardiovascular diseases, including hypertension.

Introduction

Hypertension plays a causative role in the onset of stroke, myocardial infarction, heart failure, peripheral arterial disease, and chronic kidney disease. Hypertension can be classified as either essential or secondary. Due to a similar pathophysiology, spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR) are widely used as an animal model for essential hypertension in humans (1). The SHR strain was derived from outbred Wistar-Kyoto (WKY) rats by selective breeding of animals that had high blood pressure. Thus, the normotensive WKY rats were used as controls for SHR (2).

Currently, antihypertensive drugs include thiazide diuretics, angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, calcium channel blockers, β-blockers, and angiotensin II receptor antagonists (3). Enalapril is an ACE inhibitor that lowers blood pressure by reducing plasma levels of angiotensin II (4). Enalapril has also been shown to reduce progression of carotid intimal and medial thickening, constriction of blood vessels and aldosterone secretion in patients with hypertension and/or diabetes (5). Nifedipine is an L-type calcium channel blocker of the dihydropyridine family, which inhibits the transmembrane influx of calcium ions into cardiac and vascular smooth muscle cells (6). Nifedipine causes arterial vasodilation, reduced muscle contraction, inhibition of reactive oxygen species (ROS) production, and vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation (7). However, the therapeutic target molecules regulated by the action of enalapril and nifedipine remain to be fully identified.

To identify the genes involved in the pathogenesis of cardiovascular diseases, including hypertension, we used DNA microarray analysis to establish gene expression profiles in heart, brain, and liver tissues from SHR, compared with the WKY controls, as well as after administration of antihypertensive drugs. The aim of this study was to: i) identify target genes that are specifically regulated by enalapril and nifedipine in an established animal model of essential hypertension, and ii) provide novel insight into therapeutic antihypertension strategies using enalapril and nifedipine.

Materials and methods

Administration of antihypertensive drugs in WKY and SHR

Enalapril and nifedipine were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Specific pathogen free 8–9-week-old male SHR and WKY rats were obtained from the Samtaco Animal Breeding Company (Osan, South Korea). All in vivo studies were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee, Chonnam National University. Enalapril (40 mg/kg/day) or nifedipine (30 mg/kg/day) were administered orally every day for 3 weeks. The dosage and duration of administration were calculated considering the maximum therapeutic dose in humans and based on previous studies (8,9).

Measurement of systolic blood pressure

Systolic blood pressure (SBP) was measured using the CODA system (Kent Scientific Corporation, Torrington, CT, USA) as previously described (10). SBP and body weight were evaluated every week. After 3 weeks of administration, the rats were sacrificed and tissue weights of the heart, brain and liver were determined.

RNA extraction

Samples of heart, brain and liver were homogenized, and total RNA was extracted using TRIzol® reagent (Molecular Research Center, Inc., Cincinnati, OH, USA). The concentration and purity of the total RNA were determined spectrophotometrically at 260 and 280 nm using an Agilent™ Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, CA, USA).

DNA microarray analysis

Differential gene expression was measured using CodeLink Rat Whole Genome Bioarrays (<34,000 genes; Amersham, Piscataway, NJ, USA) following the manufacturer's protocol, and the data were analyzed as previously described (11). Briefly, for first-strand cDNA synthesis, 5 μg of total RNA was heated at 70°C for 10 min with control bacterial mRNA and a T7 oligo(dT) primer, followed by incubation with first-strand reaction components (10X buffer, 5 mM dNTP, RNase inhibitor and reverse transcriptase) for 1 h at 42°C. The second strand was produced by incubation of first-strand cDNA products with second-strand reaction components (10X buffer, 5 mM dNTP, RNase H, DNA polymerase) for 2 h at 16°C. Double-stranded cDNA was purified using a QIAquick purification kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA). Purified double-stranded cDNA was incubated at 37°C for 14 h with IVT mix (10X reaction buffer, biotinylated UTP, UTP, ATP, CTP, GTP and T7 enzyme) to enable in vitro transcription of cRNA. The biotin-labeled cRNA was purified using the Qiagen RNeasy mini kit (Qiagen). A mixture of 10 μg of cRNA and 5X fragmentation buffer was incubated at 94°C for 20 min, and then hybridized at 90°C for 5 min. After chilling on ice for 10 min, the hybridization mixtures were slowly injected into sealed microarray slides. The slides were shaken at 37°C and 300 rpm for 18–24 h prior to incubation at 46°C for 1 h with preheated 0.75X TNT buffer [1X TNT: 0.1 M Tris-HCl (pH 7.6), 0.15 M NaCl, and 0.05% Tween-20], followed by incubation at room temperature for 30 min with 3.4 ml of Cy5-streptavidin working solution. The slides were washed four times with 1X TNT buffer for 5 min and then rinsed with 0.1X SSC/0.05% Tween™ for 30 sec. Hybridization to the arrays was detected using a ScanArray Express scanner (Packard BioScience, Meriden, CT, USA) with the laser set at 635 nm. After scanning, the array images were analyzed by ImaGene 6.0 and GeneSight 4.1 software.

Treatment of MOVAS cells with interleukin-24 (IL-24)

MOVAS cells (1x105/ml), an immortalized mouse vascular aorta smooth muscle cells, were grown in DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS and 1% penicillin-streptomycin (Gibco-BRL, Rockville, NY, USA) at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO2. When the cells were 70% confluent, the medium was replaced with serum-free DMEM. After serum starvation for 12 h, the cells were treated with 0.3 mM H2O2 (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) for 6 h in the presence or absence of recombinant human (rh) IL-24 (50 ng/ml; R&D Systems, Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA).

RT-PCR and real-time PCR

Total RNA was isolated using TRIzol® reagent (Molecular Research Center, Inc.). First-strand cDNA was synthesized from 5.0 μg of total RNA using an M-MLV reverse transcriptase kit (Promega, Madison, WI, USA), according to the manufacturer's instructions. For RT-PCR, the synthesized cDNAs were added to a PCR mixture consisting of 10X PCR buffer, 0.25 mM dNTP, 0.5 unit TaqDNA polymerase and 10 pmol of gene-specific primers. Primers used for PCR were: angiotensinogen, 5′-gtacagacagcaccctactt-3′ and 5′-cacgtcacggagaagttgtt-3′; endothelin-1, 5′-agctggtggaaggaaggaaactacg-3′ and 5′-gacagtgcagaaaggtgaggtagac-3′; angiotensin II type 1 receptor-associated protein (ATRAP), 5′-tgcttggggcaacttcactatc-3′ and 5′-acggtgcatgtggtagacgag-3′; platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF), 5′-tccagcgacaaggaacagaacg-3′ and 5′-ggagattcagattcaccactttgc-3′; β-actin, 5′-gagatggccactgccgcatcctct-3′ and 5′-atggtgctaggagccagagcagta-3′. PCR amplification was performed using 26 cycles (β-actin) or 28 cycles (all others) at 95°C for 1 min, 56°C for 1 min, and 72°C for 2 min, followed by a final extension for 10 min at 72°C. Equal volumes of reaction mixture from each sample were loaded onto 1% agarose gels and visualized by ethidium bromide staining.

Real-time PCR amplifications were performed in 48-well plates in a MiniOpticon™ Real-Time PCR Detection System (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., USA) in a total volume of 10 μl, including 1 μl of template cDNA, 10 pmol of gene-specific primers and iQ SYBR-Green Supermix (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.). Each sample was analyzed in triplicate. Primers used for PCR were: myocyte enhancer factor 2D (Mef2d), 5′-cagcagccagcactacagag-3′ and 5′-ggcagggatgaccttgttta-3′; IL-24, 5′-ggcctgagcctaatccttct-3′ and 5′-ctgcagaacctgtggtttca-3′; occludin, 5′-gagggtacacagaccccaga-3′ and 5′-caggattgcgctgactatga-3′; peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor δ (Pparδ), 5′-aacatccccaacttcagcag-3′ and 5′-tactgcgcaagaactcatgg-3′; triadin, 5′-gcttccagacctgctttgtc-3′ and 5′-ggctcttttcctttcccatc-3′; moesin, 5′-cccaaagagtcttggagcag-3′ and 5′-atgttgagacccaaggcatc-3′; guanosine monophosphate reductase (Gmpr), 5′-gatgtggccaatgggtattc-3′ and 5′-ccgactcccactttgatgat-3′; β-actin, 5′-attgttaccaactgggacgacatg-3′ and 5′-cttcatgaggtagtctgtcaggtc-3′. PCR amplification was performed as follows: 95°C for 15 min, followed by 48 cycles at 95°C for 30 sec, 55°C for 30 sec, and 72°C for 30 sec. All data were normalized to β-actin expression levels.

Statistical analysis

For statistical analysis of data, P-values were analyzed using a two-way ANOVA and post-hoc test. Results are expressed as the means ± SEM, and differences are considered statistically significant when P<0.05.

Results

SBP, body and tissue weights

SBP levels of SHR were higher than those of WKY rats (128±11 mmHg in WKY vs. 186±10 mmHg in SHR, P<0.05), while administration with enalapril or nifedipine for 3 weeks significantly decreased SBP levels of SHR (186±10 mmHg in SHR vs. 144±9 mmHg in enalapril-treated SHR, P<0.05 or 142±8 mmHg in nifedipine-treated SHR, P<0.05) (Table I). SHR had a lower body weight than WKY (233±6 g in WKY vs. 228±6 g in SHR, Day 0; 254±5 g in WKY vs. 246±7 g in SHR, Day 21) (Table I). The heart weights of SHR were greater than those of the WKY rats (1.00±0.05 g in WKY vs. 1.22±0.05 g in SHR, Day 0; 1.09±0.004 g in WKY vs. 1.30±0.05 g in SHR, Day 21, P<0.05), but weights of the brain and liver did not show apparent differences between SHR and WKY rats. Administration with enalapril or nifedipine did not significantly affect the body and tissue weights in SHR (Table I).

Table I

Systolic blood pressure, body and tissue weights of WKY and SHR.

Table I

Systolic blood pressure, body and tissue weights of WKY and SHR.

WKYSHR


UntreatedUntreated Enalapril-treated Nifedipine-treated




Day 0Day 21Day 0Day 21Day 0Day 21Day 0Day 21
Blood pressure, mmHg118±7128±11177±12a186±10a178±11144±9b176±8142±8c
Body weight, g233±6254±5228±4246±7226±5238±3227±5241±4
Tissue weight, g
 Heart1.00±0.051.09±0.041.22±0.05a1.30±0.05a1.20±0.031.25±0.061.21±0.051.24±0.04
 Brain1.4±0.031.5±0.021.4±0.051.4±0.061.4±0.041.4±0.041.4±0.031.4±0.05
 Liver10.2±0.510.9±0.611.0±0.512.1±0.511.1±0.411.9±0.511.2±0.411.8±0.6

{ label (or @symbol) needed for fn[@id='tfn1-ijmm-31-01-0179'] } Values are represented as the means ± SEM (n=6).

a P<0.05 SHR vs. WKY rats;

b P<0.05 enalapril Day 0 vs. enalapril Day 21; and

c P<0.05 nifedipine Day 0 vs. nifedipine Day 21.

{ label (or @symbol) needed for fn[@id='tfn5-ijmm-31-01-0179'] } WKY, Wistar-Kyoto rats; SHR, spontaneously hypertensive rats.

Effects of nifedipine and enalapril on differential gene expression in the heart, brain and liver from SHR

We used 34K gene chip microarray analysis to identify differentially expressed genes in the heart, brain, and liver from WKY and SHR as well as SHR treated with antihypertensive drugs. In total, 4,020 genes were found to be differentially expressed, with expression profiles clustering into three different groups using the K-means algorithm (Fig. 1). Heart, brain and liver samples showed 1,146, 265 and 172 upregulated genes, respectively, in SHR compared with the WKY controls. Administration of enalapril in SHR decreased the expression of 948, 104 and 45 of these same genes in the heart, brain and liver, respectively, compared with the untreated SHR. Similarly, nifedipine administration decreased the expression of 921, 111 and 69 of these genes in the heart, brain and liver, respectively.

In the converse analysis, 1,887, 283 and 267 genes showed decreased expression in the heart, brain and liver, respectively, from SHR compared with the WKY controls. Among these downregulated genes, expression of 1,490, 36 and 50 genes in the heart, brain and liver, respectively, was increased in SHR treated with enalapril compared with untreated SHR. Similarly, the expression of 1,564, 102 and 47 of these genes in the heart, brain and liver, respectively, was increased by nifedipine administration.

Several of the differentially expressed genes are known to be involved in the pathogenesis of cardiovascular diseases, as shown in Table II. Expression of 23 genes was markedly elevated in these three tissues from SHR compared with the WKY controls, whereas 10 genes showed decreased expression. Among these differentially regulated genes, analysis of heart samples from SHR showed that the expression of 11 genes was increased, while the expression of 7 genes was decreased. The expression of 9 genes was increased in brain samples from SHR, while the expression of 2 genes was decreased. Analysis of liver samples showed that the expression of 3 genes was elevated, while 1 was decreased. Markedly, these gene expression patterns were reversed by administration of either enalapril or nifedipine. We also identified 16 differentially expressed genes that had not previously been reported to be involved in the pathogenesis of cardiovascular diseases (Table III). In heart samples from SHR, 5 genes were upregulated compared with the WKY controls, and 3 genes were downregulated. In brain samples from SHR, 2 genes were upregulated, while 2 genes were downregulated. In liver samples from SHR, 3 genes were upregulated, while 1 gene was downregulated. Among these three tissues, the most prominent changes in gene expression were observed in the heart. These data show that administration of SHR with antihypertensive drugs led to changes in gene expression in a drug- and tissue-specific manner.

Table II

Genes showing significant changes in gene expression between WKY and SHR or between SHR and antihypertensive drug-treated SHR.

Table II

Genes showing significant changes in gene expression between WKY and SHR or between SHR and antihypertensive drug-treated SHR.

Fold changes

TissueAccession no.Gene descriptionGene categorySHR vs. WKYEnalapril vs. vehicleNifedipine vs. vehicle
HeartNM_030840Solute carrier family 26, member 5 (Slc26a5)Transportation10.47−12.32−7.92
NM_181364Thyrotropin releasing hormone receptor 2 (Trhr2)Signal transduction7.45−4.95−5.38
NM_031818Chloride intracellular channel 4 (Clic4)Transportation7.39−7.04−6.44
NM_0128525-hydroxytryptamine (serotonin) receptor 1D (Htr1d)Signal transduction5.88−0.61−1.54
NM_001037632Sp7 transcription factor (Sp7) Differentiation5.81−8.52NC
NM_012654Solute carrier family 9 (sodium/hydrogen exchanger), member 3 (Slc9a3)Transportation5.75−0.70−1.35
NM_175595Calcium channel, voltage-dependent, α2/δ subunit 3 (Cacna2d3)Transportation5.75−5.83−4.65
NM_017089Ephrin B1 (Efnb1)Development4.97−3.41−0.64
NM_183331Coagulation factor VIII, procoagulant component (F8)Coagulation4.04−5.01−2.56
NM_022221Matrix metalloproteinase-8 (Mmp8)Proteolysis3.66−6.37NC
NM_030860Myocyte enhancer factor 2D (Mef2d)Development3.04NC−0.05
NM_031329Occludin (Ocln)Metabolism−8.13NC0.70
NM_053491Plasminogen (Plg)Coagulation−6.241.16NC
NM_033237Galanin prepropeptide (Gal)Immune response−5.943.061.69
NM_017074Cystathionine γ-lyase (Cth)Metabolism−4.04NC2.84
NM_013141Peroxisome proliferator activated receptor δ (Ppard)Metabolism−3.81NC5.20
NM_175758Solute carrier family 1, member 7Transportation−3.571.512.53
NM_017034Pim-1 oncogene (Pim1)Signal transduction−3.190.58NC
BrainNM_133575Interleukin 1 receptor-like 2 (Il1rl2)Immune response10.54NC−6.71
NM_012537Cytochrome P450, family 11, subfamily b, polypeptide 1 (Cyp11b1)Metabolism7.54NC−3.22
NM_021666Triadin (Trdn)Homeostasis6.43−5.33−5.09
NM_012687Thromboxane A synthase 1 (Tbxas1)Metabolism6.12−5.54−4.98
NM_023092Myosin IC (Myo1c)Transportation5.66−4.10−4.41
NM_017265Hydroxy-δ-5-steroid dehydrogenase, 3 β- and steroid δ-isomerase 6 (Hsd3b6)Metabolism5.61−6.35NC
NM_020071Fibrinogen β chain (Fgb)Coagulation4.20−3.54−3.77
NM_030863Moesin (Msn)Migration3.88−3.83−3.40
NM_001109880Adducin 2, β (Add2)Cell structure3.63−4.04−4.01
NM_017017Hepatocyte growth factor (Hgf)Cell growth−5.260.92NC
NM_030851Bradykinin receptor B1 (Bdkrb1)Cell growth−3.62NC1.88
LiverM75148Kinesin light chain C (Klc1)Transportation6.70−5.00−6.47
XM_001071882Dynein, axonemal, heavy polypeptide 10 (Dnah10)Transportation5.50−7.01−9.36
NM_057188Guanosine monophosphate reductase (Gmpr)Metabolism4.39NC−6.59
NM_022399Calreticulin (Calr)Protein folding−1.090.771.03

[i] The fold change values represent the ratios of the relative expression levels compared to the individual controls. Positive and negative values represent upregulated and downregulated genes, respectively. NC, no change; WKY, Wistar-Kyoto rats; SHR, spontaneously hypertensive rats.

Table III

Genes not previously known to be involved in the pathogenesis of cardiovascular diseases.

Table III

Genes not previously known to be involved in the pathogenesis of cardiovascular diseases.

Fold changes

TissueAccession no.Gene descriptionGene categorySHR vs. WKYEnalapril vs. vehicleNifedipine vs. vehicle
Heart
 DownregulatedNM_183330Cathepsin Z (Ctsz)Proteolysis5.66−6.25−6.62
NM_017004Carboxylesterase 1C (Ces1c)Metabolism4.16−0.06−0.85
NM_172022ProSAPiP1 protein (Prosapip1)Cell structure2.48−0.46−1.57
NM_080901Recoverin (Rcvrn)Transportation2.250.130.33
NM_023955Secretory carrier membrane protein 2 (Scamp2)Transportation1.88−1.69−4.90
 UpregulatedNM_144759Acetylserotonin O-methyltransferase (Asmt)Metabolism−4.581.171.93
NM_053643Phosphatidate cytidylyltransferase 2 (Cds2)Metabolism−4.38−0.64−1.35
NM_133311Interleukin-24 (IL-24)Cell survival−2.300.961.68
Brain
 DownregulatedNM_1447522–5 oligoadenylate synthetase 1B (Oas1b)Immune response6.06−6.42−6.44
NM_053487Peroxisomal biogenesis factor 11 α (Pex11a) Differentiation2.57−3.41−1.73
 UpregulatedNM_019149Matrin 3 (Matr3)Cell structure−2.42NC1.58
NM_001172305Protein kinase C, β 1 (Prkcb)Signal transduction−1.16NC1.25
Liver
 DownregulatedNM_130756Acyl-coenzyme A thioesterase 8 (Acot8)Metabolism1.65−1.20−1.34
NM_022382Phosphodiesterase 4D interacting protein (Pde4dip)Signal transduction1.25−1.40−1.45
NM_001004133SH3 and multiple ankyrin repeat domains protein 2 (Shank2)Development0.87−1.23−1.64
 UpregulatedNM_031533UDP glycosyltransferase 2 family, polypeptide B (Ugt2b)Metabolism−1.501.561.36

[i] The fold change values represent the ratios of the relative expression levels compared to the individual controls. Positive and negative values represent upregulated and downregulated genes, respectively. NC, no change; WKY, Wistar-Kyoto rats; SHR, spontaneously hypertensive rats.

Validation of microarray data by real-time PCR

To validate the microarray data, the expression levels of 7 genes were measured using real-time PCR (Table IV). Expression of IL-24 in heart samples from SHR was increased by enalapril compared with SHR controls, but the expression of occludin and Pparδ did not change. Expression of triadin and moesin was elevated in brain samples of SHR compared with WKY controls, but it was decreased after administration of enalapril. Gmpr and Mef2d showed no change in expression in the heart or liver from SHR compared with WKY controls. In addition, the elevated expression of triadin, moesin, Gmpr and Mef2d in the heart, brain, and liver of SHR was lowered by nifedipine, while decreased expression of IL-24, occludin and Pparδ in the heart of SHR was raised by nifedipine. These results correlate with those from our microarray data.

Table IV

Comparison of differential gene expression measurements between microarray and real-time PCR analyses.

Table IV

Comparison of differential gene expression measurements between microarray and real-time PCR analyses.

Microarray (fold changes)Real-time PCR (fold changes)


TissueGene descriptionSHR vs. WKYEnalapril vs. vehicleNifedipine vs. vehicleSHR vs. WKYEnalapril vs. vehicleNifedipine vs. vehicle
HeartMyocyte enhancer factor 2D (Mef2d)3.04NC−0.052.27±0.01NC−0.05±0.01
Interleukin-24 (IL-24)−2.300.961.68−1.01±0.110.94±0.220.42±0.12
Occludin (Ocln)−8.13NC0.70−0.45±0.03NC0.53±0.02
Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor δ (Pparδ)−3.81NC5.20−1.67±0.05NC1.83±0.08
BrainTriadin (Trdn)6.43−5.33−5.091.83±1.67−2.91±0.03−2.39±0.03
Moesin (Msn)3.88−3.83−3.401.77±0.03−0.19±0.01−0.14±0.01
LiverGuanosine monophosphate reductase (Gmpr)4.39NC−6.590.62±0.02NC−0.17±0.01

[i] The fold change values represent the ratios of the relative expression levels compared to the individual controls. Positive and negative values represent upregulated and downregulated genes, respectively. NC, no change; WKY, Wistar-Kyoto rats; SHR, spontaneously hypertensive rats.

Effect of IL-24 on the expression of genes associated with cardiovascular disease in MOVAS cells treated with H2O2

The overproduction of intracellular ROS, such as superoxide anions (O2), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), and hydroxyl radicals (OH-), has been implicated in the pathogenesis of cardiovascular diseases, including hypertension, heart failure, atherosclerosis and diabetes (12). ROS can induce the expression of genes associated with cardiovascular diseases in vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs) (13,14). IL-24 is among the differentially expressed genes described above, but no role of IL-24 in cardiovascular disease has been reported. To investigate the effect of IL-24 on ROS-mediated gene expression, RT-PCR was performed in MOVAS cells treated with H2O2 in the presence or absence of rhIL-24. The expression of angiotensinogen, endothelin-1, ATRAP and PDGF was increased by treatment with H2O2, but reduced by rhIL-24 (Fig. 2). There was no effect of IL-24 alone on the expression of the above genes. These data suggest that IL-24 might play a role in the suppression of ROS-induced gene expression in cardiovascular disease.

Discussion

Hypertension is a key risk factor for cardiovascular mortality through target-tissue damage induced on the heart, brain, liver, kidney and vessels by its various effects (15,17). It has been reported that the heart and brain tissues are damaged by high blood pressure, leading to heart hypertrophy and stroke (16). In addition, the liver is the main tissue of angiotensinogen synthesis, and angiotensin II causes liver fibrosis, which results in portal hypertension (17). Previous studies found that administration of SHR with antihypertensive drugs caused changes in gene expression in the kidney and bladder tissues (18,19). However, there are few similar studies using the heart, brain or liver tissue from SHR treated with the antihypertensive drugs enalapril or nifedipine.

The objective of our study was to determine how these drugs affect gene expression in SHR tissues other than kidney or bladder. In the heart, brain, and liver tissues from SHR, we found that oral administration of these drugs altered the expression of 33 genes involved in cardiovascular disease pathogenesis. In these tissues, we also identified 16 differentially expressed genes that were not previously known to be involved in cardiovascular disease pathogenesis (Table III). We confirmed the differential gene expression found using microarray analysis (Table II) by real-time PCR on selected genes, including Mef2d, IL-24, occludin, Pparδ, triadin, moesin and Gmpr (Table IV). The biological roles of these genes in cardiovascular disease have been demonstrated, but no studies have shown changes in their expression in an animal model of hypertension as a result of administration with enalapril and nifedipine. Our identification of genes known to be associated with cardiovascular disease validates this experimental system.

Our microarray analysis also identified 16 genes that have not been implicated in cardiovascular disease or shown to be regulated by antihypertensive drugs (Table III). Among these is cathepsin, a lysosomal cysteine protease that is associated with the pathogenesis of cancer, bone remodeling, and cardiovascular disease through degradation of extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins (20,21). ECM degradation activity of cathepsin contributes to the pathogenesis of various diseases, including cancer and cardiovascular disease (20,22). Cathepsin Z, listed in Table III, is the only carboxypeptidase in the cathepsin family (23) that is highly expressed in gastric cancer and hepatocellular carcinoma and contributes to tumor development (24,25). Secretory carrier membrane protein (SCAMP), a family of highly conserved tetraspanning transmembrane proteins, has been known to play a role as a carrier to the cell surface in post-golgi recycling pathways (26) and to be involved in endocytosis (27) and exocytosis (28,29). SCAMP2 has been characterized as a novel serotonin transporter (SERT)-interacting protein that regulates the subcellular distribution of SERT (30). It is known that mice overexpressing SERT generate pulmonary arterial hypertension (31,32). In this context, the genes listed in Table III including cathepsin Z and SCAMP2 may be novel therapeutic targets in cardiovascular disease. However, this needs to be further defined for correlation with cardiovascular disease.

Among the differentially expressed genes found in this study is IL-24, which was previously known as melanoma differentiation antigen 7 (mda-7) exhibiting proapoptotic activity in a variety of tumor cells and belonging to the IL-10 family of cytokines (which also includes IL-19, IL-20, IL-22 and IL-26) (33). Recent studies have reported several anticancer functions of IL-24, including cancer-specific induction of apoptosis, cell cycle regulation, and the ability to inhibit angiogenesis (34). IL-24 has also been known to selectively inhibit the growth and migration of mouse VSMCs (MOVAS cells), but the precise mechanisms involved remain unclear (35). A series of the molecular pathogenesis are common in cancer and vascular diseases, such as atherosclerosis and hypertension (36), but little is known about the role of IL-24 on the pathogenesis of cardiovascular diseases. In this study, we are the first to show that IL-24 might be capable of inhibiting expression of cardiovascular disease-associated genes in ROS-treated mouse VSMCs (MOVAS cells). ROS play important roles in the pathophysiology of cardiovascular diseases, such as hyperlipidemia, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, ischemic heart disease, and chronic heart failure. In addition, H2O2 itself promotes rat VSMC proliferation (37), and exogenous H2O2 can induce production of endogenous H2O2 by activating cellular NAD(P)H oxidase (38). We found that IL-24 regulates the expression of inflammation- and hypertension-related genes, such as angiotensinogen, endothelin-1, ATRAP and PDGF, in H2O2-treated MOVAS cells. These data suggest that IL-24 may be a novel therapeutic target for hypertension as well as cardiovascular disease.

In conclusion, our study is the first report on the gene expression profiles from the heart, brain and liver of SHR orally treated with enalapril or nifedipine. These data may aid in the delineation of the molecular mechanisms that underlie the potential efficacy of enalapril and nifedipine against cardiovascular disease. In addition, the differentially expressed genes identified here may be potential biomarkers as well as novel targets for the prevention of cardiovascular disease, potentially providing valuable information for the development of antihypertensive drugs.

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the Korea Science and Engineering Foundation through the Research Center for Women's Diseases (R11-2005-017-02002) and the Bio-industry Technology Development Program (111066-3), Ministry for Food, Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, Republic of Korea.

References

1 

Trippodo NC and Frohlic ED: Similarities of genetic (spontaneous) hypertension. Man and rat Circ Res. 48:309–319. 1981. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

2 

Okamoto K and Aoki K: Development of a strain of spontaneously hypertensive rats. Jpn Circ J. 27:282–293. 1963. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

3 

Klingbeil AU, Schneider M, Martus P, et al: A meta-analysis of the effects of treatment on left ventricular mass in essential hypertension. Am J Med. 115:41–46. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

4 

Ménard J, Campbell DJ, Azizi M and Gonzales MF: Synergistic effects of ACE inhibition and Ang II antagonism on blood pressure, cardiac weight, and renin in spontaneously hypertensive rats. Circulation. 96:3072–3078. 1997.PubMed/NCBI

5 

Hosomi N, Mizushige K and Ohyama H: Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition with enalapril slows progressive intima-media thickening of the common carotid artery in patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Stroke. 32:1539–1545. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar

6 

Croom KF and Wellington K: A Review of the use of modified-release formulations in the treatment of hypertension and angina pectoris. Drugs. 66:497–528. 2006.PubMed/NCBI

7 

Ueng KC, Lin MC, Chan KC and Lin CS: Nifedipine gastrointestinal therapeutic system: an overview of its antiatherosclerotic effects. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol. 3:769–780. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

8 

Tostes JM: Effects of hypertension on abdominal wall healing: experimental study in rats. Surg Today. 37:215–219. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

9 

Yono M, Yamamoto Y, Yoshida M, Ueda S, et al: Effects of doxazosin on blood flow and mRNA expression of nitric oxide synthase in the spontaneously hypertensive rat genitourinary tract. Life Sciences. 81:218–222. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

10 

Spijkers LJ, Janssen BJ, Nelissen J, et al: Antihypertensive treatment differentially affects vascular sphingolipid biology in spontaneously hypertensive rats. PLoS One. 6:e292222011. View Article : Google Scholar

11 

Sul D, Kim H, Oh E, Phark S, et al: Gene expression profiling in lung tissues from rats exposed to formaldehyde. Arch Toxicol. 81:589–597. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

12 

Touyz RM and Schiffrin EL: Reactive oxygen species in vascular biology: implications in hypertension. Histochem Cell Biol. 122:339–352. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

13 

Ruef J, Hu ZY, Yin LY, Wu Y, et al: Induction of vascular endothelial growth factor in balloon-injured baboon arteries. Circ Res. 81:24–33. 1997. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

14 

Chua CC, Hamdy RC and Chua BH: Upregulation of vascular endothelial growth factor by H2O2 in rat heart endothelial cells. Free Radic Biol Med. 25:891–897. 1998. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

15 

Cohuet G and Struijker-Boudier H: Mechanisms of target organ damage caused by hypertension: therapeutic potential. Pharmacol Ther. 111:81–98. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

16 

Mancia G, De Backer G, Dominiczak A, Cifkova R, et al: 2007 guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension: the Task Force for the Management of Arterial Hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J. 28:1462–1536. 2007.

17 

Lugo-Baruqui A, Muñoz-Valle JF, Arévalo-Gallegos S, et al: Role of angiotensin II in liver fibrosis-induced portal hypertension and therapeutic implications. Hepatol Res. 40:95–104. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

18 

Okuda T, Sumiya T, Mizutani K, et al: Analyses of differential gene expression in genetic hypertensive rats by microarray. Hypertens Res. 25:249–255. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

19 

Yono M, Yoshida M, Yamamoto Y, et al: Identification of potential therapeutic targets in hypertension-associated bladder dysfunction. BJU Int. 105:877–883. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

20 

Liu J, Sukhova GK, Sun JS, Xu WH, et al: Lysosomal cysteine proteases in atherosclerosis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 24:1359–1366. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

21 

Sevenich L, Schurigt U, Sachse K, Gajda M, et al: Synergistic antitumor effects of combined cathepsin B and cathepsin Z deficiencies on breast cancer progression and metastasis in mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 107:2497–2502. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

22 

Chapman HA, Riese RJ and Shi GP: Emerging roles for cysteine proteases in human biology. Annu Rev Physiol. 59:63–88. 1997. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

23 

Nägler DK, Storer AC, Portaro FC, Carmona E, et al: Major increase in endopeptidase activity of human cathepsin B upon removal of occluding loop contacts. Biochemistry. 36:12608–12615. 1997.PubMed/NCBI

24 

Krueger S, Kalinski T, Hundertmark T, Wex T, et al: Upregulation of cathepsin X in Helicobacter pylori gastritis and gastric cancer. J Pathol. 207:32–42. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

25 

Wang J, Chen L, Li Y and Guan XY: Overexpression of cathepsin Z contributes to tumor metastasis by inducing epithelial-mesenchymal transition in hepatocellular carcinoma. PLoS One. 6:e249672001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

26 

Castle A and Castle D: Ubiquitously expressed secretory carrier membrane proteins (SCAMPs) 1–4 mark different pathways and exhibit limited constitutive trafficking to and from the cell surface. J Cell Sci. 118:3769–3780. 2005.

27 

Fernández-Chacón R and Südhof TC: Novel SCAMPs lacking NPF repeats: ubiquitous and synaptic vesicle-specific forms implicate SCAMPs in multiple membrane-trafficking functions. J Neurosci. 20:7941–7950. 2000.PubMed/NCBI

28 

Fernández-Chacón R, Achiriloaie M, Janz R, et al: SCAMP1 function in endocytosis. J Biol Chem. 275:12752–12756. 2000.

29 

Guo Z, Liu L, Cafiso D and Castle D: Perturbation of a very late step of regulated exocytosis by a secretory carrier membrane protein (SCAMP2)-derived peptide. J Biol Chem. 277:35357–35363. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

30 

Liao H, Ellena J, Liu L, Szabo G, et al: Secretory carrier membrane protein SCAMP2 and phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate interactions in the regulation of dense core vesicle exocytosis. Biochemistry. 46:10909–10920. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

31 

Müller HK, Wiborg O and Haase J: Subcellular redistribution of the serotonin transporter by secretory carrier membrane protein 2. J Biol Chem. 281:28901–28909. 2006.PubMed/NCBI

32 

MacLean MR, Deuchar GA, Hicks MN, et al: Overexpression of the 5-hydroxytryptamine transporter gene: effect on pulmonary hemodynamics and hypoxia-induced pulmonary hypertension. Circulation. 109:2150–2155. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

33 

Sainz-Perez A, Gary-Gouy H, Gaudin F, et al: IL-24 induces apoptosis of chronic lymphocytic leukemia B cells engaged into the cell cycle through dephosphorylation of STAT3 and stabilization of p53 expression. J Immunol. 181:6051–6060. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

34 

Lebedeva IV, Emdad L, Su ZZ, Gupta P, et al: mda-7/IL-24, novel anticancer cytokine: Focus on bystander antitumor, radiosensitization and antiangiogenic properties and overview of the phase I clinical experience (Review). Int J Oncol. 31:985–1007. 2007.

35 

Chen J, Chada S, Mhashilkar A and Miano JM: Tumor suppressor MDA-7/IL-24 selectively inhibits vascular smooth muscle cell growth and migration. Mol Ther. 8:220–229. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

36 

Ross JS, Stagliano NE, Donovan MJ, Breitbart RE, et al: Atherosclerosis: a cancer of the blood vessels? Am J Clin Pathol. 116(Suppl): S97–S107. 2001.PubMed/NCBI

37 

Rao GN and Berk BC: Active oxygen species stimulate vascular smooth muscle cell growth and proto-oncogene expression. Circ Res. 70:593–599. 1992. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

38 

Li WG, Miller FJ Jr, Zhang HJ, Spitz DR, et al: Active oxygen species stimulate vascular smooth muscle cell growth and proto-oncogene expression. J Biol Chem. 276:29251–29256. 2001.

Related Articles

Journal Cover

January 2013
Volume 31 Issue 1

Print ISSN: 1107-3756
Online ISSN:1791-244X

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Lee K, Kang H, Ko C, Oh E, Park M, Lee H, Choi HR, Yun C, Jung W, Oh J, Oh J, et al: Differential gene expression profiles in spontaneously hypertensive rats induced by administration of enalapril and nifedipine. Int J Mol Med 31: 179-187, 2013
APA
Lee, K., Kang, H., Ko, C., Oh, E., Park, M., Lee, H. ... Kang, H. (2013). Differential gene expression profiles in spontaneously hypertensive rats induced by administration of enalapril and nifedipine. International Journal of Molecular Medicine, 31, 179-187. https://doi.org/10.3892/ijmm.2012.1183
MLA
Lee, K., Kang, H., Ko, C., Oh, E., Park, M., Lee, H., Choi, H., Yun, C., Jung, W., Oh, J., Kang, H."Differential gene expression profiles in spontaneously hypertensive rats induced by administration of enalapril and nifedipine". International Journal of Molecular Medicine 31.1 (2013): 179-187.
Chicago
Lee, K., Kang, H., Ko, C., Oh, E., Park, M., Lee, H., Choi, H., Yun, C., Jung, W., Oh, J., Kang, H."Differential gene expression profiles in spontaneously hypertensive rats induced by administration of enalapril and nifedipine". International Journal of Molecular Medicine 31, no. 1 (2013): 179-187. https://doi.org/10.3892/ijmm.2012.1183