|
1
|
Towfighi A, Markovic D and Ovbiagele B:
Impact of a healthy lifestyle on all-cause and cardiovascular
mortality after stroke in the USA. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry.
83:146–151. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
2
|
Cho HM, Choi BY, Chang CH, et al: The
clinical characteristics of motor function in chronic hemiparetic
stroke patients with complete corticospinal tract injury.
NeuroRehabilitation. 31:207–213. 2012.
|
|
3
|
Han C, Wang Q, Meng PP and Qi MZ: Effects
of intensity of arm training on hemiplegic upper extremity motor
recovery in stroke patients: a randomized controlled trial. Clin
Rehabil. 27:75–81. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
4
|
Notturno F, Sepe R, Caulo M, Uncini A and
Committeri G: Pseudocortical and dissociate discriminative sensory
dysfunction in a thalamic stroke. Cortex. 49:336–339. 2013.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
5
|
Pahlman U, Savborg M and Tarkowski E:
Cognitive dysfunction and physical activity after stroke: the
Gothenburg cognitive stroke study in the elderly. J Stroke
Cerebrovasc Dis. 21:652–658. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
6
|
Carter AR, Patel KR, Astafiev SV, et al:
Upstream dysfunction of somatomotor functional connectivity after
corticospinal damage in stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair.
26:7–19. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
7
|
Indredavik B, Slordahl SA, Bakke F,
Rokseth R and Haheim LL: Stroke unit treatment. Long-term effects.
Stroke. 28:1861–1866. 1997. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
8
|
Liepert J, Miltner WH, Bauder H, et al:
Motor cortex plasticity during constraint-induced movement therapy
in stroke patients. Neurosci Lett. 250:5–8. 1998. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
9
|
Kopp B, Kunkel A, Muhlnickel W, Villringer
K, Taub E and Flor H: Plasticity in the motor system related to
therapy-induced improvement of movement after stroke. Neuroreport.
10:807–810. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
10
|
Liepert J, Bauder H, Wolfgang HR, Miltner
WH, Taub E and Weiller C: Treatment-induced cortical reorganization
after stroke in humans. Stroke. 31:1210–1216. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
11
|
Nelles G, Jentzen W, Jueptner M, Muller S
and Diener HC: Arm training induced brain plasticity in stroke
studied with serial positron emission tomography. Neuroimage.
13:1146–1154. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
12
|
Johansen-Berg H, Dawes H, Guy C, Smith SM,
Wade DT and Matthews PM: Correlation between motor improvements and
altered fMRI activity after rehabilitative therapy. Brain.
125:2731–2742. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
13
|
Schaechter JD, Kraft E, Hilliard TS, et
al: Motor recovery and cortical reorganization after
constraint-induced movement therapy in stroke patients: a
preliminary study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 16:326–338. 2002.
View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
14
|
Dijkhuizen RM, Singhal AB, Mandeville JB,
et al: Correlation between brain reorganization, ischemic damage,
and neurologic status after transient focal cerebral ischemia in
rats: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. J Neurosci.
23:510–517. 2003.
|
|
15
|
Mountz JM, Liu HG and Deutsch G:
Neuroimaging in cerebrovascular disorders: measurement of cerebral
physiology after stroke and assessment of stroke recovery. Semin
Nucl Med. 33:56–76. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
16
|
Carmichael ST: Cellular and molecular
mechanisms of neural repair after stroke: making waves. Ann Neurol.
59:735–742. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
17
|
Lindenberg R, Renga V, Zhu LL, Betzler F,
Alsop D and Schlaug G: Structural integrity of corticospinal motor
fibers predicts motor impairment in chronic stroke. Neurology.
74:280–287. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
18
|
Lee JS, Han MK, Kim SH, Kwon OK and Kim
JH: Fiber tracking by diffusion tensor imaging in corticospinal
tract stroke: Topographical correlation with clinical symptoms.
Neuroimage. 26:771–776. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
19
|
Stinear CM, Barber PA, Smale PR, Coxon JP,
Fleming MK and Byblow WD: Functional potential in chronic stroke
patients depends on corticospinal tract integrity. Brain.
130:170–180. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
20
|
Rossini PM, Altamura C, Ferreri F, et al:
Neuroimaging experimental studies on brain plasticity in recovery
from stroke. Eura Medicophys. 43:241–254. 2007.PubMed/NCBI
|
|
21
|
Nudo RJ: Mechanisms for recovery of motor
function following cortical damage. Curr Opin Neurobiol.
16:638–644. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
22
|
Vaina LM, Sikoglu EM, Soloviev S, et al:
Functional and anatomical profile of visual motion impairments in
stroke patients correlate with fMRI in normal subjects. J
Neuropsychol. 4:121–145. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
23
|
Krainik A, Duffau H, Capelle L, et al:
Role of the healthy hemisphere in recovery after resection of the
supplementary motor area. Neurology. 62:1323–1332. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
24
|
Duffau H, Lopes M, Sichez JP, Bitar A and
Capelle L: A new device for electrical stimulation mapping of the
brainstem and spinal cord. Minim Invasive Neurosurg. 46:61–64.
2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
25
|
Aisen ML, Krebs HI, Hogan N, McDowell F
and Volpe BT: The effect of robot-assisted therapy and
rehabilitative training on motor recovery following stroke. Arch
Neurol. 54:443–446. 1997. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
26
|
Volpe BT, Krebs HI, Hogan N, Edelstein OL,
Diels C and Aisen M: A novel approach to stroke rehabilitation:
robot-aided sensorimotor stimulation. Neurology. 54:1938–1944.
2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
27
|
Volpe BT, Krebs HI, Hogan N, Edelsteinn L,
Diels CM and Aisen ML: Robot training enhanced motor outcome in
patients with stroke maintained over 3 years. Neurology.
53:1874–1876. 1999.PubMed/NCBI
|
|
28
|
Volpe BT, Krebs HI and Hogan N: Is
robot-aided sensorimotor training in stroke rehabilitation a
realistic option? Curr Opin Neurol. 14:745–752. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
29
|
Volpe BT, Ferraro M, Lynch D, et al:
Robotics and other devices in the treatment of patients recovering
from stroke. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 5:465–470. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
30
|
Volpe BT, Ferraro M, Krebs HI and Hogan N:
Robotics in the rehabilitation treatment of patients with stroke.
Curr Atheroscler Rep. 4:270–276. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
31
|
Ferraro M, Palazzolo JJ, Krol J, Krebs HI,
Hogan N and Volpe BT: Robot-aided sensorimotor arm training
improves outcome in patients with chronic stroke. Neurology.
61:1604–1607. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
32
|
Fasoli SE, Krebs HI, Stein J, Frontera WR,
Hughes R and Hogan N: Robotic therapy for chronic motor impairments
after stroke: follow-up results. Arch Phys Med Rehabil.
85:1106–1111. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
33
|
Daly JJ, Hogan N, Perepezko EM, et al:
Response to upper-limb robotics and functional neuromuscular
stimulation following stroke. J Rehabil Res Dev. 42:723–736. 2005.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
34
|
Macclellan LR, Bradham DD, Whitall J, et
al: Robotic upper-limb neurorehabilitation in chronic stroke
patients. J Rehabil Res Dev. 42:717–722. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
35
|
Finley MA, Fasoli SE, Dipietro L, et al:
Short-duration robotic therapy in stroke patients with severe
upper-limb motor impairment. J Rehabil Res Dev. 42:683–692. 2005.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
36
|
Prange GB, Jannink MJ, Groothuis-Oudshoorn
CG, Hermens HJ and Ijzerman MJ: Systematic review of the effect of
robot-aided therapy on recovery of the hemiparetic arm after
stroke. J Rehabil Res Dev. 43:171–184. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
37
|
Reinkensmeyer DJ: Robotic assistance for
upper extremity training after stroke. Stud Health Technol Inform.
145:25–39. 2009.PubMed/NCBI
|
|
38
|
Kwakkel G, Kollen BJ and Krebs HI: Effects
of robot-assisted therapy on upper limb recovery after stroke: a
systematic review. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 22:111–121. 2008.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
39
|
Astrakas LG, Naqvi SH, Kateb B and Tzika
AA: Functional MRI using robotic MRI compatible devices for
monitoring rehabilitation from chronic stroke in the molecular
medicine era (Review). Int J Mol Med. 29:963–973. 2012.PubMed/NCBI
|
|
40
|
Crafton KR, Mark AN and Cramer SC:
Improved understanding of cortical injury by incorporating measures
of functional anatomy. Brain. 126:1650–1659. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
41
|
Huang VS and Krakauer JW: Robotic
neurorehabilitation: a computational motor learning perspective. J
Neuroeng Rehabil. 6:52009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
42
|
Carey LM and Seitz RJ: Functional
neuroimaging in stroke recovery and neurorehabilitation: conceptual
issues and perspectives. Int J Stroke. 2:245–264. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
43
|
Karl JM, Alaverdashvili M, Cross AR and
Whishaw IQ: Thinning, movement, and volume loss of residual
cortical tissue occurs after stroke in the adult rat as identified
by histological and magnetic resonance imaging analysis.
Neuroscience. 170:123–137. 2010.
|
|
44
|
Khanicheh A, Muto A, Triantafyllou C, et
al: fMRI-compatible rehabilitation hand device. J Neuroeng Rehabl.
3:242006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
45
|
Khanicheh A, Muto A, Triantafyllou C,
Astrakas LG, Mavroidis C and Tzika A: MR compatible erf-based
robotic device for hand rehabilitation after stroke. Proc Intl Soc
Mag Reson Med. 13:11102005.
|
|
46
|
Tzika A, Khanicheh A, Muto A,
Triantafyllou C, Astrakas LG and Mavroidis C: Novel rehabilitation
hand robots and fMRI in Stroke [Abstract]. Eur Radiol. 16(Suppl 1):
1832006.
|
|
47
|
Khanicheh A, Mintzopoulos D, Weinberg B,
Tzika AA and Mavroidis C: MR_CHIROD v.2: A fMRI Compatible
Mechatronic Hand Rehabilitation device. In: Proceedings of the 2007
IEEE 10th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics;
Noodwijk, The Netherlands. pp. 883–889. 2007
|
|
48
|
Khanicheh A, Mintzopoulos D, Weinberg B,
Tzika AA and Mavroidis C: MR_CHIROD v.2: magnetic resonance
compatible smart hand rehabilitation device for brain imaging. IEEE
Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 16:91–98. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
49
|
Lazar M, Weinstein DM, Tsuruda JS, et al:
White matter tractography using diffusion tensor deflection. Hum
Brain Mapp. 18:306–321. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
50
|
Schaechter JD, Moore CI, Connell BD, Rosen
BR and Dijkhuizen RM: Structural and functional plasticity in the
somatosensory cortex of chronic stroke patients. Brain.
129:2722–2733. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
51
|
Koganemaru S, Mima T, Thabit MN, et al:
Recovery of upper-limb function due to enhanced use-dependent
plasticity in chronic stroke patients. Brain. 133:3373–3384. 2010.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
52
|
Cauraugh JH and Summers JJ: Neural
plasticity and bilateral movements: a rehabilitation approach for
chronic stroke. Prog Neurobiol. 75:309–320. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
53
|
Jack D, Boian R, Merians A, et al: Virtual
reality-enhanced stroke rehabilitation. IEEE Trans Neural Syst
Rehabil Eng. 9:308–318. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
54
|
Hesse S, Schulte-Tigges G, Konrad M,
Bardeleben A and Werner C: Robot-assisted arm trainer for the
passive and active practice of bilateral forearm and wrist
movements in hemiparetic subjects. Arch Phys Med Rehabil.
84:915–920. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
55
|
Shelton FN and Reding MJ: Effect of lesion
location on upper limb motor recovery after stroke. Stroke.
32:107–112. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
56
|
Smania N, Picelli A, Gandolfi M, Fiaschi A
and Tinazzi M: Rehabilitation of sensorimotor integration deficits
in balance impairment of patients with stroke hemiparesis: a
before/after pilot study. Neurol Sci. 29:313–319. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
57
|
Xerri C, Merzenich MM, Peterson BE and
Jenkins W: Plasticity of primary somatosensory cortex paralleling
sensorimotor skill recovery from stroke in adult monkeys. J
Neurophysiol. 79:2119–2148. 1998.PubMed/NCBI
|
|
58
|
Kleim JA, Barbay S, Cooper NR, et al:
Motor learning-dependent synaptogenesis is localized to
functionally reorganized motor cortex. Neurobiol Learn Mem.
77:63–77. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
59
|
Hickmott PW and Steen PA: Large-scale
changes in dendritic structure during reorganization of adult
somatosensory cortex. Nat Neurosci. 8:140–142. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
60
|
Carmichael ST, Archibeque I, Luke L, Nolan
T, Momiy J and Li S: Growth-associated gene expression after
stroke: evidence for a growth-promoting region in peri-infarct
cortex. Exp Neurol. 193:291–311. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
61
|
Dijkhuizen RM, Ren J, Mandeville JB, et
al: Functional magnetic resonance imaging of reorganization in rat
brain after stroke. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 98:12766–12771. 2001.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
62
|
Heller SL, Heier LA, Watts R, et al:
Evidence of cerebral reorganization following perinatal stroke
demonstrated with fMRI and DTI tractography. Clin Imaging.
29:283–287. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
63
|
Lum P, Reinkensmeyer D, Mahoney R, Rymer
WZ and Burgar C: Robotic devices for movement therapy after stroke:
current status and challenges to clinical acceptance. Top Stroke
Rehabil. 8:40–53. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
64
|
Granziera C, Schmahmann JD, Hadjikhani N,
et al: Diffusion spectrum imaging shows the structural basis of
functional cerebellar circuits in the human cerebellum in vivo.
PLoS One. 4:e51012009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
65
|
Thuen M, Olsen O, Berry M, et al:
Combination of Mn(2+)-enhanced and diffusion tensor MR imaging
gives complementary information about injury and regeneration in
the adult rat optic nerve. J Magn Reson Imaging. 29:39–51.
2009.
|
|
66
|
Carmichael ST: Plasticity of cortical
projections after stroke. Neuroscientist. 9:64–75. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
67
|
Dietrichs E: Brain plasticity after
stroke-implications for post-stroke rehabilitation. Tidsskr Nor
Laegeforen. 127:1228–1231. 2007.(In Norwegian).
|
|
68
|
O’Dell MW, Lin CC and Harrison V: Stroke
rehabilitation: strategies to enhance motor recovery. Annu Rev Med.
60:55–68. 2009.
|
|
69
|
Ward NS: Mechanisms underlying recovery of
motor function after stroke. Postgrad Med J. 81:510–514. 2005.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
70
|
Desmurget M, Bonnetblanc F and Duffau H:
Contrasting acute and slow-growing lesions: a new door to brain
plasticity. Brain. 130:898–914. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
