Phytosphigosine-1-phosphate increases sensitivity of EGF-dependent cell proliferation

Introduction

Human dermal fibroblasts (HDFs) are mesenchymal cells specialized in extracellular matrix synthesis, including collagen, elastin and hyaluronic acid, in the dermis (1,2). Dermal fibroblast proliferation is important in wound healing and skin structure homeostasis (3). Therefore, a growth factor was used for proliferating HDFs in cosmetics (4).

Epidermal growth factor (EGF), one of various growth factors, is a small polypeptide first purified by Cohen from the submaxillary gland of adult male mice (5). EGF is important in cell proliferation, migration and differentiation (5). These roles are mediated via activation of the EGF receptor (EGFR), a transmembrane glycoprotein with tyrosine kinase activity (6). Activated EGFR regulates proliferation and migration via activation of intrinsic signaling molecules (7,8). EGF is added to serum-free media in in vitro cell culture systems as EGF is essential to cell growth (9). Furthermore, EGF exerts cytoprotective effects from cell damage, such as senescence (10). Therefore, EGF is used as an inducer of dermal fibroblast proliferation in cosmetics and medicine (4).

Phytosphingosine-1-phosphate (PhS1P) is derived from fungi and plants, and is structurally similar to sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P), an endogenous signal lipid in mammalian cells (11,12). PhS1P is an agonist for S1P receptors, with a particularly high affinity for S1P4 (13). S1P receptors include the isomers, S1P1, S1P2, S1P3 and S1P4, in mammalian cells (13). Since each receptor activates different downstream signals, the effects of these S1Ps are slightly different (14,15). Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the PhS1P function in HDFs. The results showed that PhS1P altered gene expression and induced EGF-dependent proliferation as a synergistic effector.

Materials and methods

Cell culture and materials

HDFs were purchased from Lonza (Basel, Switzerland) and maintained in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM; Gibco, Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). The cells were incubated at 37°C in a humidified incubator containing 5% CO2. PhS1P was obtained from Phytos Co., Ltd. (Suwon, Korea).

RNA extraction and microarray

Total RNA was isolated using RiboEX (GeneAll, Seoul, Korea) and quantified based on the optical density ratio (280/260 nm) using a Bioanalyzer 2100 (28S RNA/18S RNA ratio; Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Equal amounts of RNA were used to synthesize cDNA and label it with biotin using an RNA amplification kit (Ambion, Austin, TX, USA). After labeling, the microarray was hybridized with biotin-labeled RNA and streptavidin-Cy3 (Invitrogen Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Following hybridization, the microarray was washed using wash E1BC buffer and scanned using the iScan system (both from Illumina, Hayward, CA, USA).

Microarray analyses

Microarray data were analyzed using Genespring GX software version 11 (Agilent Technologies). mRNAs flagged ‘present’ in at least one sample were analyzed using fold-change. The threshold cut-off was 1.3-fold for fold-change between non-treated HDFs and PhS1P-treated HDFs. Significantly altered mRNAs were sorted using the gene ontology (GO) tool.

Quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR)

cDNA was synthesized using MMLV-reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen Life Technologies) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Synthesized cDNA was used for qPCR (Line gene K; Bioer Technology, Co., Ltd., China) using specific primers for cyclin A1, B1 and B2. Primers were designed by primer 3 (http://frodo.wi.mit.edu) (Table I). Expression was normalized to β-actin.

Table I Quantitative PCR primer sequences.

Table I

Quantitative PCR primer sequences.

Gene	Primer sequences
Cyclin A2	Forward 5′-TTATTGCTGGAGCTGCCTTT-3′
	Reverse 5′-CTCTGGTGGGTTGAGGAGAG-3′
Cyclin B1	Forward 5′-CGGGAAGTCACTGGAAACAT-3′
	Reverse 5′-AAACATGGCAGTGACACCAA-3′
Cyclin B2	Forward 5′-TTGCAGTCCATAAACCCACA-3′
	Reverse 5′-GAAGCCAAGAGCAGAGCAGT-3′

MTT assay

Cell viability was assessed using 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay. HDFs were cultured for 24 h in 96-well plates with PhS1P and EGF. MTT tetrazolium salt (0.5 mg/ml; Sigma) was added to cells for 4 h. After incubation, the medium was replaced with dimethyl sulfoxide in each well. The absorbance of each sample was measured at 595 nm using a plate reader (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA).

Results

PhS1P cytotoxicity in HDFs

To assess the effect of PhS1P on cell viability, HDFs were treated with various concentrations of PhS1P (0, 0.25, 0.5 and 1 μM) for 24 h (Fig. 1). We determined that PhS1P at concentrations of ≤1 μM had no cytotoxicity.

Figure 1 Phytosphingosine-1-phosphate (PhS1P) affects human dermal fibroblasts (HDFs) viability. Dose-dependent effect of PhS1P on HDF viability. HDFs (5×104 cells/well) were plated in 24-well plates and cultured for 24 h in serum-free DMEM with the indicated concentrations of PhS1P and epidermal growth factor (EGF). Cell viability was determined using MTT assay and absorbance was measured at 490 nm. Mean values were calculated from three independent experiments. Results are expressed as the mean ± SD.

PhS1P alters the mRNA expression profile

To identify genes that may play a PhS1P-dependent role, we compared the expression profiles of non-treated and 1 μM PhS1P-treated HDFs using the Illumina bead chip HumanHT-12. In 47,207 whole genes, we first filtered 35,973 genes that were flagged ‘present’ with a frequency higher than the sensitivity of detection in a minimum of one array. Fold-change was then analyzed in these flag-filtered genes. Genes that changed by 1.3-fold between non-treated and PhS1P-treated HDFs were presented on the heat map (Fig. 2A). The analyses identified 193 upregulated genes and 495 downregulated genes (Fig. 2B).

Figure 2 Phytosphingosine-1-phosphate (PhS1P) regulates the gene expression profile in human dermal fibroblasts (HDFs). HDFs were treated with PhS1P (1 μM) for 24 h, and total RNA was extracted as described in Materials and methods. Changes in gene expression were determined by cDNA microarray gene profiling using the Illumina Human Bead-Chip array. A fold-change of >1.3-fold was considered differential expression. (A) Heat map of upregulated and downregulated genes. Red and blue colors show relative expression intensity. (B) Number of mRNA altered by 1 μM PhS1P in HDFs.

Using the GO analytical tool, the genes were sorted based on their roles in biological processes (Fig. 3). Genes upregulated in PhS1P-treated HDFs appeared to be involved in cell processes such as cell cycle, cell division, microtubule-based processes, chromosome segregation, cell communication, cellular responses to stimuli, and cellular component organization or biogenesis. In particular, cell cycle-related ontology (cell cycle, cell division and chromosome segregation) was significantly enriched by PhS1P.

Figure 3 Gene ontology (GO) analyses of phytosphingosine-1-phosphate (PhS1P)-related genes in human dermal fibroblasts (HDFs). Enriched GO categories (P<0.01) were determined by counting ontology of up- and downregulated genes in biological processes. Gene classification was performed according to gene ontology terms: i) biological function, ii) cellular component and iii) molecular function. However, molecular function was not analyzed in the GO analyses.

Cyclins A2, B1 and B2 were regulated by PhS1P. Cyclins are well-known regulators in cells (16). Therefore, the analyses revealed that PhS1P affected cell proliferation by altering specific mRNAs. In addition, we confirmed the mRNA expression change of cyclin A2, B1 and B2 using qPCR (Fig. 4).

Figure 4 Phytosphingosine-1-phosphate (PhS1P) regulates cell cycle-related genes and shows the proliferative synergistic effect with epidermal growth factor (EGF) in human dermal fibroblasts (HDFs). Total RNA was isolated from PhS1P-treated and non-treated HDFs. Results are expressed as the mean ± SD in triplicate. (A) Cyclin A2, (B) cyclin B1 and (C) cyclin B2. (D) Proliferative synergistic effect of PhS1P and EGF. HDFs (5×104 cells/well) were plated in 24-well plates and cultured for 24 h in serum-free DMEM with the indicated concentrations of PhS1P and EGF. Cell viability was determined using MTT assay and absorbance was measured at 490 nm. Mean values were calculated from three independent experiments. Results are expressed as the mean ± SD.

We also examined the synergistic effect of PhS1P and EGF on HDF viability. Compared with PhS1P-treated HDFs in the absence of EGF, the viability of PhS1P-treated HDFs with EGF was markedly increased (Fig. 4D). These data indicate that PhS1P is a co-effector in the induction of EGF-dependent cell proliferation.

Discussion

The aim of the study was to evaluate the effect of PhS1P on EGF-induced proliferation in HDFs. PhS1P is phytochemically derived from fungi, plants, and even mammalian cells (12). In a previous study, it was shown that PhS1P protects against hydrogen peroxide-dependent growth arrest (17). Recent data from Lee et al (17) suggested that PhS1P had no significant effect on the proliferation at concentrations <1 μM in HDFs (Fig. 1). However, PhS1P (1 μM) regulates various cell cycle-related genes in HDFs (Fig. 2). In particular, the cyclins (cyclin A2, B1 and B2), master regulators of the cell cycle, were upregulated by PhS1P. Cyclin A2 regulates S-phase progression and entry into mitosis (18,19). During S phase, cyclin A2 initiates DNA synthesis (20). During the G/M phase, cyclin A2 triggers entry into mitosis by activating cyclin B1-Cdk1 (21).

In the progressing cell cycle, a sustained high expression of cyclins is essential (16). However, overexpression of cyclins is insufficient to induce cell cycle progression (22,23). As shown in Fig. 2, PhS1P upregulated mRNA expression of cyclin A2, B1 and B2 although there was no change in cell viability (Figs. 1 and 2).

Combining the present data with our previous data (17), we determined that <1 μM PhS1P increases cyclin expression, but does not affect viability. Moreover, EGF triggered proliferation in PhS1P-treated HDFs (Fig. 4D). Therefore, together with the results from Ikezawa et al (22), our data suggest that a cyclin-enriched condition results in synergistic growth following treatment with growth factors, such as EGF (24).

In summary, results of the present study have shown that PhS1P regulates cell cycle-related genes. In addition, the changes in gene expression synergistically trigger EGF-induced proliferation.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank all other members of Damy Chemical Co., Ltd. for their support. This study was supported by the Konkuk University in 2012.

References