Transplantation of human umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stems cells for the treatment of Becker muscular dystrophy in affected pedigree members
- Authors:
- Published online on: January 30, 2015 https://doi.org/10.3892/ijmm.2015.2084
- Pages: 1051-1057
Abstract
Introduction
Duchenne and Becker muscular dystrophies (DMD and BMD) are common X-linked recessive neuromuscular degenerative diseases. The majority of patients with DMD and BMD are male, although females are the carriers, and the frequency of occurrence of DMD and BMD in newborn males is estimated to be 1/3,500 and 1/12,000, respectively (1). The molecular basis for DMD/BMD is a mutation of the human dystrophin gene, and many family pedigrees sustain a number of functionally inactivating mutations which include large fragment deletions (55–65%), duplications (5–15%), point mutations (35%) and small insertions/deletions (indels). Dystrophin is the intermediate component linking the cytoskeleton to the extracellular matrix (ECM), and the protein plays an important role in maintaining membrane stability and the function of muscle cells (2–5). The membrane of muscle cells can be easily destroyed in the absence or dysfunction of dystrophin, which eventually leads to the replacement of muscle tissue by adipose and connective tissues.
Some mutations of the human dystrophin gene produce proteins possessing partial function. This version of the disease is clinically referred to as BMD, and 92% of patients are diagnosed as BMD (6,7). The clinical manifestations of DMD/BMD include the degeneration of muscle fibers, the progressive atrophy of proximal limb muscle, pseudohypertrophy of the gastrocnemius muscle, motor retardation or delay, a ‘waddling’ gait and Gowers’ sign (8). Symptoms in individuals affected by DMD are often already apparent by the age of 3 years, and patients eventually succumb to the disease at a young age (approximately 20 years) due to respiratory or heart failure (9). The symptoms of BMD are relatively milder than those of DMD, with disease onset beginning anywhere from the age of 5 to 20 years and death occurring at the age of 40–50 years (9).
Despite an extensive molecular understanding of the diseases, treatment options to date remain limited for DMD/BMD and patients still succumb to the diseases. Therefore, new therapies are urgently required (10). To date, glucocorticoids are the only drug that effectively delays the progression of DMD, maintains the stability of lung tissue and lung function, and reduces the mortality of patients with DMD due to heart failure (11–14). In 2010, glucocorticoids were included in the DMD treatment guidelines by the DMD Care Considerations Working Group of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (15). However, the mechanisms underlying glucocorticoid function in alleviating some symptoms or delaying the progression of DMD remain unknown (16). Furthermore, several side-effects in the chronic use of glucocorticoids are undesirable, including weight gain, Cushingoid symptoms/features, high blood pressure, cataracts, bone mineral density reduction, vertebral compression fracture, growth retardation and delayed puberty (17).
Multipotent human umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cells (hUC-MSCs) (18) have been explored as a potential, innovative cell-based therapy for tissue regeneration in various conditions or diseases. hUC-MSCs are capable of differentiating into multiple cells types, such as osteogenic, chondrogenic, adipogenic and myogenic cells (19), as well as into neuron-like cells (20) and germ-like cells (22) in vitro. Cells isolated from the umbilical cord tissue have also been shown to be more effective in rescuing photoreceptors and visual function, and to be capable of sustained population doublings without karyotypic changes, thus proving useful in retinal diseases (21). Cultured mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) from the human umbilical cord artery (UCA), umbilical cord vein (UCV), whole umbilical cord (UCC) and saphenous vein segments have exhibited a myofibroblast-like morphology and mechanical function in vitro (23). The cells are abundant, easy to harvest and to culture and have lower immunogenicity. Based on all of these properties, in this study, hUC-MSCs were transplanted into 3 pedigree members affected BMD, and the responses to this cell therapy were evaluated based on physical parameters and molecular and histological examination.
Materials and methods
Ethics statement
All protocols in the present study were approved by the Ethics Committee of the Shandong Cancer Hospital (Shandong, China). Prior informed consent was obtained from all the subjects participating in the study.
Clinical data
The pedigree chart of the family with BMD from the Shandong Cancer Hospital is presented in Fig. 1, and our group has previously reported the underlying pathogenic mutations of this family (24). Three male family members (II1, II2 and II3) with an age of onset of 12 to 15 years displayed clinical manifestations typical of BMD, including the degeneration of muscle fibers, the progressive atrophy of proximal limb muscles, the pseudohypertrophy of gastrocnemius muscle, motor retardation, Gowers’ sign and a ‘waddling’ gait and all eventually lost the ability to walk. One family member (III2) included in this study had not yet reached the age of onset, but was symptomatic. All patients had received no prior treatment, including glucocorticoids.
Each patient underwent routine blood work and an electrocardiogram prior to the procedure. Clinical evaluation was carried out prior to the procedure (control; 0 week) and at 1, 3, 4 and 12 weeks post-transplantation of hUC-MSCs. The evaluation of the patients was based on physical, as well as molecular testing: i) myodynamia of the 4 limbs according to the Medical Research Council scale for muscle strength; ii) performance according to the Barthel index of Activities of Daily Living; iii) muscular size based on upper and lower limb circumference; iv) subjective symptoms and signs; and v) levels of serum creatine kinase (CK), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and creatine kinase isoenzymes (CK-MB).
Transplantation of hUC‑MSCs
The hUC-MSCs were purchased from Tianjin Amcellgene Engineering Co., Ltd. (Tianjin, China), where the stem cells had been prepared according to the guidelines issued by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA; Silver Spring, MD, USA). The pack size was 20 ml/IU cells (1×107 cells/IU; batch number 201206JF11). Quality control of the hUC-MSCs included an assessment based on in vitro morphology, differentiation potential, tumorigenicity and proliferation. Immunophenotyping confirmed that >90% of the cells were positive for CD166, CD105, CD13 and CD29, and negative for CD34, CD45, CD86 and HLA-DR. All assays were conducted and certified by Tianjin Amcellgene Engineering Co., Ltd.
The patients received 5 mg dexamethasone intravenously 10 min prior to transplantation. The cells were transplanted by an intravenous drip into the left forearm vein, and the infusion was completed within 30 min. Patients II2 and II3 received 5 IU and patient III2 received 3 IU.
Results
Clinical status prior to the transplantation of hUC‑MSCs
Three family members were examined for disease characteristics. All exhibited normal intelligence. Upon physical examination, the 2 adult patients (II2 and II3) exhibited low muscular tension, muscle weakness, striated muscle atrophy, a winged scapula, failure of straightening both lower limbs, diminished tendon reflexes and were negative for Babinski syndrome. The pediatric patient (III2) had not yet reached the age of onset of this BMD pedigree, but was symptomatic with an abnormal gait and a winged shoulder. In the present study, 3 patients including patients II2, II3 and III2 received a transplantation of hUC-MSCs. Eosinophilic material deposition was detected by an electromyogram and in the muscular biopsies from patients II2, II3 and III2 (Fig. 2). Myogenic damage was apparent in 3 patients (II2, II3 and III2) with pathological manifestations, including necrotic muscle fibers, dark (slow) muscle fibers in skeletal muscle, reactive inflammatory cell invasion and hyperplasia of fibrous tissue (Fig. 2). Based on a clinical evaluation, all patients included in this study were physically symptomatic, and their disease status was confirmed by histological analysis (Table I).
Table ISubjective symptoms and signs of each patient from 0 to 12 weeks post-transplantation of hUC-MSCs. |
Functional assessment following the transplantation of hUC-MSCs
Three family members (II2, II3 and III2) received an infusion of hUC-MSCs (5, 5 and 3 IU, respectively) and were examined at 1, 3, 4 and 12 weeks following treatment. Patients II2 and II3 showed an improved muscle force of the limbs and an increased muscular size. Physical improvement was already observed within 1 week. All 3 patients showed an increased muscle strength, appetite and food intake (Table I). In addition, the walking gait of patient III2 was gradually improved from this point on and was normal by 12 weeks post-transplantation (Table I). Serum levels of CK, AST and LDH are usually higher in patients with DMD/BMD. The degree of enzyme elevation in muscle disease largely reflects the underlying disease process, and is predominantly due to myonecrosis or membrane defects (25); thus, increases in CK and LDH levels are generally an indication of muscle damage. The serum levels of CK and LDH in patients II2 and II3 following the infusion of hUC-MSCs were decreased relative to the baseline levels (week 0; Fig. 3). The cell therapy, therefore, reduced muscle damage over this time frame in these 2 patients. By contrast, while the CK activity in patient III2 had initially decreased, the levels had increased by week 3 and then continued to rise sharply up to 12 weeks. However, the muscle size and muscle strength of patient III2 remained roughly stable over this time frame (Table II). Finally, a histological analysis of the muscle biopsies revealed that the muscle tissue remained essentially unaltered. At week 12 of evaluation, the muscle biopsies from patients II2 and II3 displayed adipose tissue deposition and degeneration, whereas eosinophilic material deposition was evident in the biopsy from patient III2 (Fig. 4). No obvious muscle regeneration was evident in the biopsies of any of the patients (Fig. 4).
Table IIThe functional assessment results of each patient from 0 to12 weeks post-transplantation of hUC-MSCs. |
Discussion
Human muscular dystrophies are devastating progressive degenerating diseases with no current remedy. Mouse models of dystrophic disease have been elegantly exploited to demonstrate the potential clinical utility of hUC-MSCs in these diseases. Previously, when hUC-MSCs were injected into the caudal veins of mice with limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2B (SJL mice), the cells had engrafted into the recipient dystrophic muscle and even expressed some human muscle proteins (26). These results highlight the effects and therapeutic potential of hUC-MSCs. In this study, we therefore infused cells into 3 patients with promising results, although the mechanisms responsible for these effects remain to be elucidated.
Efficacy has not been demonstrated in all studies utilizing hUC-MSCs for the treatment of dystrophic disease. In a different mouse model of muscle injury, only a limited fraction of hUC-MSCs were in fact found to express markers of pluripo-tent and myogenic cells, such as octamer-binding transcription factor 4 (OCT-4) and Nanog and only a minority of cells actually participated in new muscle fiber and myotube formation (27). Therefore, these results indicated that hUC-MSCs possessed only limited potential for promoting granulation. Nevertheless, the transplanted hUC-MSCs promoted increased muscle mass and exerted a beneficial effect on regeneration of the injured muscle despite their inability to incorporate directly into regenerating muscle fibers. Similar trends were also observed in the present study. For example, the patients with long duration of the disease (II2 and II3) only showed limited enhanced muscle force and muscle mass following the transplantation of hUC-MSCs, possibly due to severe muscle atrophy. By contrast, the muscle mass, muscle force, and the physical signs and subjective symptoms of pediatric patient III2 markedly improved.
The mechanism responsible for the degeneration of muscle tissue in DMD/BMD may originate in part from the depletion of specific cell types crucial for regeneration. Studies have clearly identified myosatellite and muscle precursor cells, located between the myolemma and the basal layer of muscle fibers, as vital for the rebuilding of injured muscle (28). Cycles of proliferation and differentiation, and the fusion of activated myosatellite cells occur in response to muscle trauma in order to rebuild functional fibers. In parallel, myosatellite cells are normally replenished through self-renewal. The skeletal muscle of patients with DMD/BMD experiences degeneration and regeneration repeatedly, to such a degree that myosatellite cells become depleted/exhausted. This scenario eventually results in the complete failure of muscle regeneration.
However, the mechanisms responsible for the positive effects of hUC-MSCs on muscle regeneration are less clear. It has been suggested that hUC-MSCs function similar to bone marrow-derived MSCs, the biological activities of which include paracrine signaling by trophic factors, the secretion of growth factors and cytokines, and the regulation of the proliferation and migration of endogenous cells (such as satellite cells and other muscle-related cells) (27,28). The source of the beneficial trophic and/or growth factors may be either endogenous cell types or the transplanted MSCs or both. Some of these factors, such as basic fibroblast growth factor, (bFGF), insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1), hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) and interleukin-6 (IL-6), are known to take part in the differentiation of myoblasts and the regeneration of muscle tissue (29,30). It is also possible that in addition to acting directly on myoblasts, these factors may promote the regeneration of injured or diseased muscle indirectly by enhancing the formation of blood vessels (31).
Although hUC-MSCs have exhibited a therapeutic effect in DMD/BMD, MSCs derived from different tissue sources have not been uniformly effective in clinical practice (23). MSCs derived from the umbilical cord have a significant advantage over those derived from bone marrow, placenta, or other tissues, as hUC-MSCs are easy to acquire and culture, and the cells have a high proliferation rate (32) and low immunogenicity (33). Moreover, hUC-MSCs are not tumorigenic and will not give rise to teratomas (34,35), and thus overall, fewer bioethical issues are involved in their collection or use (36). Low immunogenicity immunoregulation (33,35,37), paracrine signaling, migration and the genomic stability of hUC-MSCs (38) have made them ideal candidates for therapies and favorable clinical prospects.
In conclusion, in the present study, to the best of our knowledge, the first transplantation of hUC-MSCs was performed in patients for the treatment of BMD. Our results revealed that no adverse reactions were detected in any patient for up to 12 weeks following transplantation, and that treatment was noticeably helpful to a patient with a shorter course of disease and less injury to muscle tissue. Although the prospective efficacy requires a longer follow-up period, the therapy used in this study provides a novel promising approach and a basis for the treatment of patients with DMD/BMD using cell therapy. The elucidation of the specific mechanisms underlying the efficacy of hUC-MSCs in patients with BMD may provide necessary insight into the development of more effective therapies for BMD.
References
Baskin B, Gibson WT and Ray PN: Duchenne muscular dystrophy caused by a complex rearrangement between intron 43 of the DMD gene and chromosome 4. Neuromuscul Disord. 21:178–182. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Winder SJ, Gibson TJ and Kendrick-Jones J: Dystrophin and utrophin: the missing links! FEBS Lett. 369:27–33. 1995. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Hoffman EP, Brown RH Jr and Kunkel LM: Dystrophin: the protein product of the Duchenne muscular dystrophy locus. Cell. 51:919–928. 1987. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Koenig M, Monaco AP and Kunkel LM: The complete sequence of dystrophin predicts a rod-shaped cytoskeletal protein. Cell. 53:219–228. 1988. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Takeshima Y, Yagi M, Okizuka Y, et al: Mutation spectrum of the dystrophin gene in 442 Duchenne/Becker muscular dystrophy cases from one Japanese referral center. J Hum Genet. 55:379–388. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Monaco AP, Bertelson CJ, Liechti-Gallati S, Moser H and Kunkel LM: An explanation for the phenotypic differences between patients bearing partial deletions of the DMD locus. Genomics. 2:90–95. 1988. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Hoffman EP, Fischbeck KH, Brown RH, et al: Characterization of dystrophin in muscle-biopsy specimens from patients with Duchenne’s or Becker’s muscular dystrophy. N Engl J Med. 318:1363–1368. 1988. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Finanger EL, Russman B, Forbes SC, Rooney WD, Walter GA and Vandenborne K: Use of skeletal muscle MRI in diagnosis and monitoring disease progression in Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 23:1–10. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Sutherland DH, Olshen R, Cooper L, et al: The pathomechanics of gait in Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 23:3–22. 1981. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Rodino-Klapac LR, Mendell JR and Sahenk Z: Update on the treatment of Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 13:3322013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Moxley RT III and Pandya S: Weekend high-dosage prednisone: a new option for treatment of Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Neurology. 77:416–417. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
King WM, Ruttencutter R, Nagaraja HN, et al: Orthopedic outcomes of long-term daily corticosteroid treatment in Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Neurology. 68:1607–1613. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Biggar WD, Harris VA, Eliasoph L and Alman B: Long-term benefits of deflazacort treatment for boys with Duchenne muscular dystrophy in their second decade. Neuromuscul Disord. 16:249–255. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Schram G, Fournier A, Leduc H, et al: All-cause mortality and cardiovascular outcomes with prophylactic steroid therapy in Duchenne muscular dystrophy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 61:948–954. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Bushby K, Finkel R, Birnkrant DJ, et al: Diagnosis and management of Duchenne muscular dystrophy, part 1: diagnosis, and pharmacological and psychosocial management. Lancet Neurol. 9:77–93. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Baltgalvis KA, Call JA, Nikas JB and Lowe DA: Effects of prednisolone on skeletal muscle contractility in mdx mice. Muscle Nerve. 40:443–454. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Malik V, Rodino-Klapac LR and Mendell JR: Emerging drugs for Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Expert Opin Emerg Drugs. 17:261–277. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
McElreavey KD, Irvine AI, Ennis KT and McLean WH: Isolation, culture and characterisation of fibroblast-like cells derived from the Wharton’s jelly portion of human umbilical cord. Biochem Soc Trans. 19:29S1991. | |
Wang HS, Hung SC, Pong ST, et al: Mesenchymal stem cells in the Wharton’s jelly of the human umbilical cord. Stem Cells. 22:1330–1337. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Fu YS, Shih YT, Cheng YC and Min MY: Transformation of human umbilical mesenchymal cells into neurons in vitro. J Biomed Sci. 11:652–660. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Lund RD, Wang S, Lu B, et al: Cells isolated from umbilical cord tissue rescue photoreceptors and visual functions in a rodent model of retinal disease. Stem Cells. 25:602–611. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Huang P, Lin LM, Wu XY, et al: Differentiation of human umbilical cord Wharton’s jelly-derived mesenchymal stem cells into germ-like cells in vitro. J Cell Biochem. 109:747–754. 2010.PubMed/NCBI | |
Kadner A, Zund G, Maurus C, et al: Human umbilical cord cells for cardiovascular tissue engineering: a comparative study. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 25:635–641. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Li F, Li Y, Cui K, et al: Detection of pathogenic mutations and the mechanism of a rare chromosomal rearrangement in a Chinese family with Becker muscular dystrophy. Clin Chim Acta. 414:20–25. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Zhang Y, Huang JJ, Wang ZQ, Wang N and Wu ZY: Value of muscle enzyme measurement in evaluating different neuromuscular diseases. Clin Chim Acta. 413:520–524. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Vieira NM, Zucconi E, Bueno CR Jr, et al: Human multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells from distinct sources show different in vivo potential to differentiate into muscle cells when injected in dystrophic mice. Stem Cell Rev. 6:560–566. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Grabowska I, Brzoska E, Gawrysiak A, et al: Restricted myogenic potential of mesenchymal stromal cells isolated from umbilical cord. Cell Transplant. 21:1711–1726. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Ten Broek RW, Grefte S and Von den Hoff JW: Regulatory factors and cell populations involved in skeletal muscle regeneration. J Cell Physiol. 224:7–16. 2010.PubMed/NCBI | |
Kasemkijwattana C, Menetrey J, Somogyl G, et al: Development of approaches to improve the healing following muscle contusion. Cell Transplant. 7:585–598. 1998. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Menetrey J, Kasemkijwattana C, Day CS, et al: Growth factors improve muscle healing in vivo. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 82:131–137. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Deasy BM, Feduska JM, Payne TR, Li Y, Ambrosio F and Huard J: Effect of VEGF on the regenerative capacity of muscle stem cells in dystrophic skeletal muscle. Mol Ther. 17:1788–1798. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Izadpanah R, Trygg C, Patel B, et al: Biologic properties of mesenchymal stem cells derived from bone marrow and adipose tissue. J Cell Biochem. 99:1285–1297. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Prasanna SJ, Gopalakrishnan D, Shankar SR and Vasandan AB: Pro-inflammatory cytokines, IFNgamma and TNFalpha, influence immune properties of human bone marrow and Wharton jelly mesenchymal stem cells differentially. PLoS One. 5:e90162010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Fong CY, Richards M, Manasi N, Biswas A and Bongso A: Comparative growth behaviour and characterization of stem cells from human Wharton’s jelly. Reprod Biomed Online. 15:708–718. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Capelli C, Gotti E, Morigi M, et al: Minimally manipulated whole human umbilical cord is a rich source of clinical-grade human mesenchymal stromal cells expanded in human platelet lysate. Cytotherapy. 13:786–801. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Romano G: Stem cell transplantation therapy: controversy over ethical issues and clinical relevance. Drug News Perspect. 17:637–645. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Lu LL, Liu YJ, Yang SG, et al: Isolation and characterization of human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells with hematopoiesis-supportive function and other potentials. Haematologica. 91:1017–1026. 2006.PubMed/NCBI | |
Fong CY, Subramanian A, Biswas A, et al: Derivation efficiency, cell proliferation, freeze-thaw survival, stem-cell properties and differentiation of human Wharton’s jelly stem cells. Reprod Biomed Online. 21:391–401. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI |