Transcriptional regulation of E-cadherin by small activating RNA: A new double-stranded RNA

  • Authors:
    • Zhiming Wu
    • Yan Li
    • Zhiyong Li
    • Zhuowei Liu
    • Zike Qin
    • Xiangdong Li
    • Yunlin Ye
    • Lei Bu
    • Bin Lin
    • Zhanyu Wang
    • Guojin Jia
    • Gang Chen
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: August 3, 2016     https://doi.org/10.3892/ijo.2016.3643
  • Pages: 1620-1628
Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

Recent studies have reported that chemically synthesized small activating RNA (saRNA) targeting the promoter regions of a gene can activate its expression in different cell lines. This technique can be a powerful therapeutic method for diseases caused by complete inactivation or reduced expression of specific genes. E-cadherin is a typical tumor suppressor gene. Loss of E-cadherin mediates the transition from benign lesions to invasive, metastatic cancer. In this study, several 21-nt small double-stranded RNAs (dsRNAs) targeting the promoter regions of human E-cadherin were designed and synthesized and the features of their function were investigated to study the regulatory role of dsRNA on E-cadherin expression. A new saRNA (dsEcad‑661) that can enhance E-cadherin expression by targeting non-coding regulatory regions in gene promoters was identified. Using dsRNA with modified base quantity and cholesterol-conjugated dsRNA, we found the antisense strand may be the guide strand of saRNA in the upregulation of E-cadherin. These findings provide several important pieces of evidence that may improve understanding of the function of saRNA and may promote its development for clinical application.

Introduction

Gene silencing by small double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) was first discovered in Caenorhabditis elegans in 1998 (1) and it quickly become an important method of genetic analysis and it has potential in gene therapy. mRNA is generally considered a target for RNA-mediated gene silencing. In the past ten years, studies have shown that dsRNA targeted to gene promoter regions can regulate gene expression at transcription level (25). Although the exact mechanisms by which this is regulated are not well understood, these findings demonstrate that dsRNA have more diverse roles in gene regulation than previously recognized. Gene activation by dsRNA is a relatively newly discovered method of inducing gene overexpression (2,4,6). Several studies have shown that some exogenously synthetic dsRNAs can activate a particular gene in a sequence specific manner rather than silencing it (2,4,7,8). This phenomenon has been termed RNA activation (RNAa) and this kind of dsRNA is called small activating RNA (saRNA) (4). Although many mysteries remain, increasing amounts of evidence suggest that RNAa is not only a novel method of studying gene function, but also holds exciting potential for cancer therapeutics (9).

E-cadherin is a cell adhesion molecule. It can mediate cell-cell adhesion and plays a pivotal role in epithelial cell behavior and tissue morphogenesis and remodeling (10,11). Downregulation of E-cadherin is closely associated with tumor invasiveness, metastasis, and poor patient prognosis (12,13). Restoration of E-cadherin by RNAa at the transcriptional level may be a suitable therapy for cancer. Previous studies have shown that some saRNAs can induce E-cadherin gene transcription in a sequence-specific manner (4,14). It is of great interest to identify new saRNA that can upregulate E-cadherin expression efficiently. It is equally important to understand the features and mechanism underlying saRNA function on E-cadherin expression, which can help improve its therapeutic application.

This report describes the design of several new dsRNAs targeted to gene promoter regions and identification of a new saRNA that can significantly enhance E-cadherin expression. The functional strand of the newly discovered dsRNAs targeted to the promoter regions of E-cadherin was also investigated. These findings further revealed functional features of saRNA that may be used in mechanistic studies and facilitate its medicinal development for clinical application.

Materials and methods

dsRNA design and synthesis

Promoter sequence (1 kb) was picked away from the CpG island and scanned for dsRNA targets based on rational siRNA design rules (9). Four candidates adhered to the rules of functional dsRNA design. Another two saRNA (dsEcad-640 and dsEcad-215) were also synthesized as previously described (4,14). Control dsRNA (dsCon) was specifically designed to have no homology to any known human sequences. Asymmetric dsRNA with 2 or 4 base losses in 5′ ends of either sense or antisense strands were also designed. The asymmetric dsRNA was designed as previously decribed (15,16). All of the dsRNA were chemically synthesized by GenePharma (Shanghai, China) (Table I).

Table I

The sequence of synthesized dsRNA and the PCR primer sequence for E-cadherin and GAPDH.

Table I

The sequence of synthesized dsRNA and the PCR primer sequence for E-cadherin and GAPDH.

dsRNA nameSequence (5′-3′)
dsE-661 (−661 to −642)Sense: CUCAGUGGCUCAUGGCUCA[dT][dT]
Antisense: UGAGCCAUGAGCCACUGAG[dT][dT]
dsE-604 (−604 to −585)Sense: GGAUCGCUUCAGCCCAGGA[dT][dT]
Antisense: UCCUGGGCUGAAGCGAUCC[dT][dT]
dsE-454 (−454 to −435)Sense: CAGCUACUAGAGAGGCUGG[dT][dT]
Antisense: CCAGCCUCUCUAGUAGCUG[dT][dT]
dsE-382 (−382 to −363)Sense: CACCACUGCACUCCAGCUU[dT][dT]
Antisense: AAGCUGGAGUGCAGUGGUG[dT][dT]
dsE-623 (−623 to −604)Sense: UUGGGAGGCCAAGGCAGGA[dT][dT]
Antisense: UCCUGCCUUGGCCUCCCAA[dT][dT]
dsE-680 (−680 to −661)Sense: CAAAAAAUUAGGCUGCUAG[dT][dT]
Antisense: CUAGCAGCCUAAUUUUUUG[dT][dT]
dsE-648 (−648 to −629)Sense: GGCUCACACCUGAAAUCCU[dT][dT]
Antisense: AGGAUUUCAGGUGUGAGCC[dT][dT]
dsControlSense:UUC UCC GAA CGU GUC ACG U[dT][dT]
Antisense:ACG UGA CAC GUU CGG AGA A[dT][dT]

PCR primerSequence (5′-3′)

E-cadherinSense: CGCCGAGAGCTACACGTTCA
Antisense: TGTCGACCGGTGCAATCTTC
GAPDHSense: CGCTCTCTGCTCCTCCTGTT
Antisense: CCATGGTGTCTGAGCGATGT
Cell culture and transfection

PC-3 and DU 145 were cultured in RPMI medium-1640 supplemented with 10% FBS, 2 mM L-glutamine, penicillin (100 U/ml), and streptomycin (100 μg/ml) in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2 maintained at 37°C. A hepatocellular carcinoma cell line (MHCC-97L, MHCC-97H, and MHCCLM3) was also cultured using DMEM medium supplemented with 10% FBS, penicillin (100 U/ml), and streptomycin (100 μg/ml). Transfections of dsRNA were carried out using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol and lasted for 72 h.

Real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR)

Total RNA was extracted from cells transfected for 72 h (mock, 50 nM dsCon, 50 nM dsEcad-661, dsEcad-604, dsEcad-454, dsEcad-382, dsEcad-680, dsEcad-648, dsEcad-623, dsEcad-640 and dsEcad-215). Reverse transcription was performed with a PrimeScript RT Reagent kit (Takara Biotechnology, Dalian, China). qPCR was performed with SYBR Green PCR Reagent kits (Toyobo Co, Osaka, Japan) at a constant annealing temperature (64°C) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Specific primer sets were designed for qPCR directed against human E-cadherin and GAPDH and synthesized by Takara Biotechnology Co. (Table I). Data were recorded and analyzed using qPCR analysis software Bio-Rad iQ5. Endogenous gene expression was normalized to GAPDH levels in the cells.

Western blot analysis

The expression of E-cadherin protein was estimated using western blotting. Cells were harvested 72 h after dsRNA treatment as described above and then washed and lysed with M-PER extraction buffer (Pierce Biotechnology) containing protease inhibitors. A BCA assay (Sangon Biotech Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China) was used to measure the concentration of protein lysates. Protein was separated on reducing SDS-polyacrylamide gels and transferred to polyvinyl difluoride membranes (PVDF, Millipore). The membranes were blocked with 3% BSA buffer for 1 h at room temperature and incubated with primary antibodies (anti-E-cadherin rabbit antibody, Cell Signaling, Beverly, MA, USA, 1:1,000 dilutions; anti-β-actin antibody, Cell Signaling, 1:1,000 dilutions) overnight at 4°C. β-actin levels were used to normalize loading. Then the membranes were incubated with goat anti-rabbit secondary antibody (Cell Signaling) 1:5,000 at 25 °C for 2 h. Antigen-antibody complexes were visualized using an enhanced chemiluminescence detection method (ECL kit, Thermo, Waltham, MA, USA).

Fluorescence microscopy analysis

Labeling of dsRNAs by Cy3 was performed by Guangzhou RiboBio Co. (Guangzhou, China). Cells were fixed with paraformaldehyde (PFA) at 6 h after dsRNAs treatment. Staining of the DNA with 4′, 6-diamidin-2′-phenylindol-dihydrochlorid (DAPI) was conducted after fixation. A Leica TCS SP5 confocal laser scanning microscope was used for fluorescence imaging.

Statistical analysis

All experiments were performed at least three times. Statistical analysis of all data was performed using Student’s t-test. A P-value <0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance.

Results

New dsRNA targeting the promoter and enhancement of E-cadherin expression

Four 21-nt dsRNAs targeting the E-cadherin promoter at sequence positions −661 (dsEcad-661), −604 (dsEcad-604), −454 (dsEcad-454), and −382 (dsEcad-382) were designed and synthesized (Fig. 1A). Regions with either high GC content or low sequence complexity were excluded as dsRNA targets. These included the CpG island and the Alu repeat element in the E-cadherin promoter (Fig. 1A). A 21-nt dsCon without significant homology to any known human sequence was also synthesized as described previously (4). These dsRNAs were transfected into two human prostate cancer cell lines: PC-3 and DU 145. The expression of E-cadherin mRNA and protein was evaluated using qPCR and western blotting, respectively. We observed a profound induction of E-cadherin mRNA (Fig. 1B) and protein expression (Fig. 1C) by dsEcad-661. While dsEcad-604, dsEcad-454 and dsEcad-382 significantly reduce the expression of E-cadherin mRNA and protein (Fig. 1B and C). To determine whether these effect of dsRNAs are specific to prostate cancer cell lines, these dsRNAs were transfected into hepatocellular carcinoma cell line MHCC-97L, MHCC-97H, and MHCCLM3. The results showed that these dsRNAs have similar regulatory effects on the expression of E-cadherin protein in MHCC-97L, MHCC-97H, and MHCCLM3 cell lines (Fig. 1D). Overall, no changes in E-cadherin expression were detected in cells transfected with mock or dsCon (Fig. 1B–D).

Previous studies have shown that a 21-nt dsRNA targeting the E-cadherin promoter at sequence positions −640 (dsEcad-640) can also induce E-cadherin expression (14). To further confirm whether there is any other target near the position −640 and −661 that can also induce the expression of E-cadherin, another three dsRNAs (dsEcad-680, dsEcad-648 and dsEcad-623) were tested. The results indicated that dsEcad-623 can significantly decrease E-cadherin expression. Neither dsEcad-680 nor dsEcad-648 was capable of regulating E-cadherin expression (Fig. 2B and C).

Identification of guide strand

Although the RNAa phenomenon was identified almost a decade ago, the precise mechanism underlying the function still remains unclear. There is some question regarding the saRNA targets: DNA or non-coding RNA transcripts (1719). Growing evidence suggests that only one strand may be required to guide activity of the dsRNA (20). To identify the target of saRNA, which strand of saRNA guides gene activation must first be determined. Hence, asymmetric saRNA molecules were synthesized without 2 or 4 base in the 5′ end of either the sense or antisense strand, which has been reported to have fewer off-target effects (15). dsEcad-661 (17/19), dsEcad-661(19/17), dsEcad-661(15/21), and dsEcad-661(21/15) were transfected to PC-3 and DU 145 cell line and their activity was analyzed, respectively, using western blot analysis. The results showed asymmetric dsEcad-661(17/19) and dsEcad-661(15/21) to have the same E-cadherin activating ability as symmetric dsEcad-661 while asymmetric dsEcad-661(19/17) and dsEcad-661(21/15) lost their gene induction activity (Fig. 3). Another two E-cadherin saRNA (dsE-640 and dsE-215) were also tested as described previously (4,14). The asymmetric dsEcad-640(17/19) and dsE-215(17/19) can induce E-cadherin expression while dsEcad-640(19/17) and dsEcad-215(19/17) lost gene regulating activity (Fig. 4). This evidence indicated that the antisense strand in saRNA duplexes was responsible for RNAa activity. The target of saRNA therefore is expected to be in the sense strand of E-cadherin DNA or the corresponding non-coding RNA transcript.

To further confirm whether the antisense strand is the guide strand of saRNA, the antisense stand of dsEcad-661 and the sense strand of dsEcad-661 was modified with cholesterol respectively, and transfected into PC-3 and DU. The cholesterol-conjugated saRNA at the sense stand of dsEcad-661 showed similar gene induction activity while cholesterol-conjugated saRNA at the antisense stand of dsEcad-661 did not show any regulatory effect on E-cadherin expression (Fig. 3).

To determine whether the promoter targeting dsRNA that can downregulate E-cadherin expression share the same target strand as saRNA, another four asymmetric dsRNA were synthesized: dsEcad-604 (17/19), dsEcad-604 (15/21), dsEcad-604 (19/17), and dsEcad-604 (21/15). The symmetric dsEcad-604 (21/21) and asymmetric dsEcad-604 were transfected into PC-3 and DU 145 cell lines as described previously. Results showed that dsEcad-604 (19/17) and dsEcad-604 (21/15) had gene silencing activity similar to that of symmetric dsEcad-604 while dsEcad-604 (17/19) and dsEcad-604 (15/21) lost gene silencing activity (Fig. 5). These results indicated that the sense strand of interfering dsRNA might be the guide strand.

Identification of nucleus entering strand

Previous studies have shown that small interfering dsRNA may, in addition to eliminating specific pools of mRNA in the cytoplasm, also work by epigenetic regulation of gene expression in the nucleus (21,22). To develop a preliminary understanding of the position where saRNA exerts its effects and confirm which strand of saRNA enters the nucleus, the sense and antisense strands of dsEcad-661 were labeled with Cy3 and transfected using the procedure described above. Sense and antisense strands of dsCon served as the control group. Immunofluorescence analysis indicated that both sense and antisense strands of dsEcad-661 were present in the cytoplasm and nucleus, which indicated that both strands of dsEcad-661 can enter the nucleus (Fig. 6). The control dsRNA without homology to any known human sequence can also enter the nucleus of PC-3 and DU 145 cell (Fig. 6).

Discussion

Downregulated E-cadherin is a key event during epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and is associated with enhanced tumor invasion and poor prognosis in variety of solid tumors (2325). RNAa is a recently discovered mechanism of gene regulation. It is mediated by dsRNA that targets gene regulatory sequences. saRNA can activate the downregulation of gene expression and so provide a new therapeutic tool for treatment of cancer. In this study, several potential dsRNAs targeting the promoter sequence of E-cadherin were designed and a new saRNA that can induce significant E-cadherin expression was discovered. Previous studies have reported three saRNA (dsEcad-302, dsEcad-215 and dsEcad-640) can induce E-cadherin expression (4,14). These results and the newly discovered dsEcad-661 suggest that E-cadherin expression can be activated by a wide array of saRNA targeting the promoter sequence. saRNA targeting the E-cadherin promoter may serve as a useful tool for further elucidation of the roles of E-cadherin in cancer and make it possible to develop new gene therapies for cancer. In this study, several dsRNAs targeting the promoter area close to the target of saRNA were found to downregulate E-cadherin expression. These findings suggest that dsRNA have more diverse roles in gene regulation than previously thought. The mechanism by which dsRNA targets the promoter regions and so mediates both gene silencing and gene activation may be very complicated.

Although the RNAa phenomenon has been known for almost a decade, the use of this technique as a therapeutic method has not yet been widely used. Poor understanding of the mechanisms by which it exerts its effects may be the main reason (7). One of these unclear mechanisms is the manner in which synthesized saRNA enters the nucleus and exerts its effect. Previous studies have demonstrated that exogenous dsRNAs may be processed by removing one strand of dsRNA to form active argonaute protein-RNA complexes containing a selected guide strand RNA and then enter the nucleus (2628). The active complex is guided to its target region by the guide strand, which may bind to complementary targets on either promoter DNA or nascent promoter RNA (9,27). A recent study also found the mechanism that saRNA-loaded Argonaut protein 2 facilitates the assembly of an RNA-induced transcriptional activation (RITA) complex, which interacts with RNA polymerase II to stimulate transcription initiation and productive elongation (29). In this study, fluorescently labeled dsRNA was used as a direct indicator of which strand can enter the nucleus. Results showed that both strands of dsRNA can enter the nucleus, which suggests that the unwinding process may take place after the dsRNA enters the nucleus. The active argonaute protein-RNA complex may form inside the nucleus. Further studies on this mechanism seem warranted.

It is still not clear how saRNAs activate genes. The activation mechanism of RNAa may involve both transcriptional and epigenetic alterations. The target of saRNA may be either promoter DNA or nascent promoter RNA transcript (18,19). It is also not clear which strand guides RNAa activity when targeting DNA or nascent promoter. Recent studies have provided evidence that RNAa activity was achieved by its antisense strand with the 5′ region playing a pivotal role (30). However, there still are controversies on the functional strands of saRNA. Some reports have suggested that the sense strand plays a pivotal role (18). As such, we designed and synthesized several asymmetric dsRNA including our newly discovered saRNA (dsEcad-640), previously described saRNA (dsEcad-640 and dsEcad-215) and interfering dsRNA (dsEcad-604). Using asymmetric dsRNA which has one inactivated strand, we showed that the antisense strand in saRNA duplexes was responsible for the RNAa activity of E-cadherin while the sense strand of interfering dsRNA was responsible for E-cadherin gene silence. To further confirm our results, we designed the cholesterol-conjugated saRNA to block the binding function of each strand selectively. The result also demonstrated that the antisense strand of saRNA was responsible for RNAa activity. This result suggested that the targets of activating dsRNA and silencing dsRNA are located on different strands of DNA or nascent promoter RNA. Previous studies on RNA-directed transcriptional gene regulation have provided a working model for the mechanism of action, which requires the recruitment of several proteins (argonaute-1 and argonaute-2), small RNAs and other factors (3134). This study brought up fresh evidence that the antisense strand of the activating dsRNA is responsible for RNAa activity and that the sense strand in silencing dsRNA guides gene activation (Fig. 7).

Recent studies showed the gene silencing mediated by asymmetric small interfering RNA is efficacious, durable, and associated with reduced off-target silencing by the sense strand (15). Asymmetric small interfering RNA structure has several advantages over the conventional 19+2 siRNA structures (16,35). This study found that asymmetric saRNA also has gene activating capacity similar to that of conventional 19+2 siRNA structures. It provides a new structural scaffold for designing activating RNA duplex and may facilitate RNAa applications in functional genomics and therapeutics.

RNAa offers a promising new therapeutic strategy for the treatment of diseases with abnormal gene downregulation. Currently, developing RNAa technology against diseases is still at the initial stage. Many of the challenges facing RNA interference based strategies are also applicable to RNAa. Further clarifying the mechanism of the saRNA action is critical for the clinical application of saRNA. In conclusion, a new target of dsRNA was here found to enhance E-cadherin expression and several new dsRNA targets that can downregulate E-cadherin expression. This study also established which strand of saRNA is the guide strand. Further studies are still needed to gain insight into the details of the mechanisms and biology of RNAa.

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by Shanghai Municipal Commission of Health and family planning (no. 201540372).

Abbreviations:

dsRNAs

double-stranded RNAs

saRNA

small activating RNA

RNAa

RNA activation

EMT

epithelial-mesenchymal transition

qPCR

real-time quantitative PCR

References

1 

Fire A, Xu S, Montgomery MK, Kostas SA, Driver SE and Mello CC: Potent and specific genetic interference by double-stranded RNA in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature. 391:806–811. 1998. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

2 

Janowski BA, Younger ST, Hardy DB, Ram R, Huffman KE and Corey DR: Activating gene expression in mammalian cells with promoter-targeted duplex RNAs. Nat Chem Biol. 3:166–173. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

3 

Elbashir SM, Harborth J, Lendeckel W, Yalcin A, Weber K and Tuschl T: Duplexes of 21-nucleotide RNAs mediate RNA interference in cultured mammalian cells. Nature. 411:494–498. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

4 

Li LC, Okino ST, Zhao H, Pookot D, Place RF, Urakami S, Enokida H and Dahiya R: Small dsRNAs induce transcriptional activation in human cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 103:17337–17342. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

5 

Ting AH, Schuebel KE, Herman JG and Baylin SB: Short double-stranded RNA induces transcriptional gene silencing in human cancer cells in the absence of DNA methylation. Nat Genet. 37:906–910. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

6 

Place RF, Noonan EJ, Földes-Papp Z and Li LC: Defining features and exploring chemical modifications to manipulate RNAa activity. Curr Pharm Biotechnol. 11:518–526. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

7 

Pushparaj PN, Aarthi JJ, Kumar SD and Manikandan J: RNAi and RNAa - the yin and yang of RNAome. Bioinformation. 2:235–237. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

8 

Wang T, Li M, Yuan H, Zhan Y, Xu H, Wang S, Yang W, Liu J, Ye Z and Li LC: saRNA guided iNOS up-regulation improves erectile function of diabetic rats. J Urol. 190:790–798. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

9 

Zheng L, Wang L, Gan J and Zhang H: RNA activation: Promise as a new weapon against cancer. Cancer Lett. 355:18–24. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

10 

van Roy F and Berx G: The cell-cell adhesion molecule E-cadherin. Cell Mol Life Sci. 65:3756–3788. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

11 

Repetto O, De Paoli P, De Re V, Canzonieri V and Cannizzaro R: Levels of soluble E-cadherin in breast, gastric, and colorectal cancers. Biomed Res Int. 2014:4080472014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

12 

Canel M, Serrels A, Frame MC and Brunton VG: E-cadherin-integrin crosstalk in cancer invasion and metastasis. J Cell Sci. 126:393–401. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

13 

Schmalhofer O, Brabletz S and Brabletz T: E-cadherin, beta-catenin, and ZEB1 in malignant progression of cancer. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 28:151–166. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

14 

Place RF, Li LC, Pookot D, Noonan EJ and Dahiya R: MicroRNA 373 induces expression of genes with complementary promoter sequences. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 105:1608–1613. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar

15 

Sun X, Rogoff HA and Li CJ: Asymmetric RNA duplexes mediate RNA interference in mammalian cells. Nat Biotechnol. 26:1379–1382. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

16 

Sano M, Sierant M, Miyagishi M, Nakanishi M, Takagi Y and Sutou S: Effect of asymmetric terminal structures of short RNA duplexes on the RNA interference activity and strand selection. Nucleic Acids Res. 36:5812–5821. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

17 

Morris KV, Santoso S, Turner AM, Pastori C and Hawkins PG: Bidirectional transcription directs both transcriptional gene activation and suppression in human cells. PLoS Genet. 4:e10002582008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

18 

Schwartz JC, Younger ST, Nguyen NB, Hardy DB, Monia BP, Corey DR and Janowski BA: Antisense transcripts are targets for activating small RNAs. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 15:842–848. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

19 

Hu J, Chen Z, Xia D, Wu J, Xu H and Ye ZQ: Promoter-associated small double-stranded RNA interacts with heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein A2/B1 to induce transcriptional activation. Biochem J. 447:407–416. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

20 

Portnoy V, Huang V, Place RF and Li LC: Small RNA and transcriptional upregulation. Wiley Interdiscip Rev RNA. 2:748–760. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

21 

Morris KV, Chan SW, Jacobsen SE and Looney DJ: Small interfering RNA-induced transcriptional gene silencing in human cells. Science. 305:1289–1292. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

22 

Guo D, Barry L, Lin SS, Huang V and Li LC: RNAa in action: From the exception to the norm. RNA Biol. 11:1221–1225. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar

23 

Nakagawa H, Hikiba Y, Hirata Y, Font-Burgada J, Sakamoto K, Hayakawa Y, Taniguchi K, Umemura A, Kinoshita H, Sakitani K, et al: Loss of liver E-cadherin induces sclerosing cholangitis and promotes carcinogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 111:1090–1095. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

24 

Corso G, Carvalho J, Marrelli D, Vindigni C, Carvalho B, Seruca R, Roviello F and Oliveira C: Somatic mutations and deletions of the E-cadherin gene predict poor survival of patients with gastric cancer. J Clin Oncol. 31:868–875. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

25 

Zhang H, Stephens LC and Kumar R: Metastasis tumor antigen family proteins during breast cancer progression and metastasis in a reliable mouse model for human breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 12:1479–1486. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

26 

Yue X, Schwartz JC, Chu Y, Younger ST, Gagnon KT, Elbashir S, Janowski BA and Corey DR: Transcriptional regulation by small RNAs at sequences downstream from 3′ gene termini. Nat Chem Biol. 6:621–629. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

27 

Jiao AL and Slack FJ: RNA-mediated gene activation. Epigenetics. 9:27–36. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar :

28 

Li LC: Chromatin remodeling by the small RNA machinery in mammalian cells. Epigenetics. 9:45–52. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar :

29 

Portnoy V, Lin SH, Li KH, Burlingame A, Hu ZH, Li H and Li LC: saRNA-guided Ago2 targets the RITA complex to promoters to stimulate transcription. Cell Res. 26:320–335. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

30 

Meng X, Jiang Q, Chang N, Wang X, Liu C, Xiong J, Cao H and Liang Z: Small activating RNA binds to the genomic target site in a seed-region-dependent manner. Nucleic Acids Res. 44:2274–2282. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

31 

Janowski BA, Huffman KE, Schwartz JC, Ram R, Nordsell R, Shames DS, Minna JD and Corey DR: Involvement of AGO1 and AGO2 in mammalian transcriptional silencing. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 13:787–792. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

32 

Kim DH, Saetrom P, Snøve O Jr and Rossi JJ: MicroRNA-directed transcriptional gene silencing in mammalian cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 105:16230–16235. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

33 

Morris KV: RNA-directed transcriptional gene silencing and activation in human cells. Oligonucleotides. 19:299–306. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

34 

Gagnon KT, Li L, Chu Y, Janowski BA and Corey DR: RNAi factors are present and active in human cell nuclei. Cell Rep. 6:211–221. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

35 

Chang CI, Yoo JW, Hong SW, Lee SE, Kang HS, Sun X, Rogoff HA, Ban C, Kim S, Li CJ, et al: Asymmetric shorter-duplex siRNA structures trigger efficient gene silencing with reduced nonspecific effects. Mol Ther. 17:725–732. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Related Articles

Journal Cover

October 2016
Volume 49 Issue 4

Print ISSN: 1019-6439
Online ISSN:1791-2423

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
APA
Wu, Z., Li, Y., Li, Z., Liu, Z., Qin, Z., Li, X. ... Chen, G. (2016). Transcriptional regulation of E-cadherin by small activating RNA: A new double-stranded RNA. International Journal of Oncology, 49, 1620-1628. https://doi.org/10.3892/ijo.2016.3643
MLA
Wu, Z., Li, Y., Li, Z., Liu, Z., Qin, Z., Li, X., Ye, Y., Bu, L., Lin, B., Wang, Z., Jia, G., Chen, G."Transcriptional regulation of E-cadherin by small activating RNA: A new double-stranded RNA". International Journal of Oncology 49.4 (2016): 1620-1628.
Chicago
Wu, Z., Li, Y., Li, Z., Liu, Z., Qin, Z., Li, X., Ye, Y., Bu, L., Lin, B., Wang, Z., Jia, G., Chen, G."Transcriptional regulation of E-cadherin by small activating RNA: A new double-stranded RNA". International Journal of Oncology 49, no. 4 (2016): 1620-1628. https://doi.org/10.3892/ijo.2016.3643