miR-93 inhibits the invasive potential of triple-negative breast cancer cells in vitro via protein kinase WNK1
- Authors:
- Published online on: November 7, 2016 https://doi.org/10.3892/ijo.2016.3761
- Pages: 2629-2636
Abstract
Introduction
Breast carcinoma is the predominant cancer in women worldwide (1). Despite advances in treatment, metastasis, tumor recurrence and drug resistance are currently the main challenges in breast cancer management (2), with metastasis occurring in almost 50% of the patients post-therapy (3).
miRNAs are 18–25 nucleotide non-coding RNAs that control gene expression by degradation of mRNA or inhibiting the translation of transcribed RNA into proteins (4,5). Aberrant miRNA expression has been found to underlie several cancers, including breast cancer (reviewed in ref. 6). miRNAs are known to regulate breast cancer progression, by acting as promoters or inhibitors of specific processes, including epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), angiogenesis, stemness of cancer stem cells, invasion, metastasis and chemoresistance (3,6).
miRNA-93 (miR-93), a member of the pro-oncogenic miR-106b-25 cluster (comprising miR-106b, miR-93 and miR-25) is overexpressed in several cancers including breast cancer (7), and belongs to the miR-17 family of miRNAs based on sequence similarity (8). The expression of miR-93 was shown to be significantly increased in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients when compared to normal tissues or non-TNBC tissues, and associated with lymph node metastasis, TNM grade and Ki-67 staining (9), suggesting that miR-93 controls proliferation and metastasis. Furthermore, the expression of miR-93 was found to be increased in ER- or PR- breast cancer patients when compared to hormonal receptor-positive breast cancer patients (10). However, studies have also revealed that miR-93 has contradictory roles in inhibiting breast cancer metastasis, by regulating the proliferation and differentiation of breast cancer stem cells (11). Nonetheless, the exact mechanism of miR-93 or its gene targets that mediate breast cancer metastasis remain largely unknown.
We examined the role of miR-93 in MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells, a TNBC cell line. Overexpression of miR-93 decreased cell migration and invasion, while, inhibition of miR-93 elicited the opposite effects in MDA-MB-231 cells. WNK lysine deficient protein kinase 1 (WNK1), one of the targets of miR-93 identified by TargetScan prediction, was verified as a putative target by the luciferase assay. Furthermore, we show that siRNA-mediated silencing of WNK1, resulted in decreased invasive ability of these cells, suggesting that miR-93 mediated changes in cell invasion was possibly via WNK1. Taken together, our results unravel a novel relationship between miR-93, WNK1 and metastasis that have potential implications in breast carcinogenesis.
Materials and methods
Cell culture
MDA-MB-231 cells (HTB-26) were purchased from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC; Manassas, VA, USA) and were grown in RPMI medium containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS).
Transfection of siRNA
MDA-MB-231 cells were seeded at a density of 2.5×105 or 3×104 cells/well in 6-well plates or 24-well plates, respectively. Cells were subsequently transfected with ON-TARGETplus SMARTpool siRNA targeting WNK1 and non-targeting siRNA using DharmaFECT (GE Dharmacon. Pittsburgh, PA, USA). The siRNA complexes were prepared in serum-free RPMI and made up to a final concentration of 20 nM. The medium was replaced 24 h post-transfection, and the transfected cells were cultured for 48 or 72 h as indicated.
Transfection of miRNA
Cells seeded at the same density as above, were reverse transfected with hsa-miR-93-5p mimic/negative control (Ambion, Austin, TX, USA) or LNA-hsa-miR-93-5p/scramble (Exiqon, Vedbaek, Denmark) and Lipofectamine RNAiMAX (mimics) or Lipofectamine 2000 (inhibitor). The miRNA complexes were prepared in Opti-MEM and made up to a final concentration of 30 nM. The medium was replaced with RPMI containing 10% FBS 6 h post-transfection, and grown for 48 or 72 h as indicated.
RNA isolation and cDNA conversion
Total RNA 48 h post-transfection was isolated using either RNAeasy kit or miRNAeasy kit (which included miRNA) (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). The isolated RNA was quantified on a spectrophotometer (NanoDrop) and converted into cDNA. Briefly, 1 μg of RNA was converted into cDNA using the SuperScript III first-strand synthesis system (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) for gene expression analysis. For analyzing miRNA expression, 20 ng of RNA was converted to cDNA using the Universal cDNA synthesis kit (Exiqon).
qPCR
The gene primers used in this study are summarized in Table I. Gene expression levels were quantified by real-time RT-PCR using the Fast SYBR-Green Master Mix (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) in 96-well MicroAmp Fast Optical plates (Applied Biosystems) on a 7900HT Fast real-time PCR system (Applied Biosystems). Relative gene expression was determined by the 2−ΔΔCt method using GAPDH as the control (12).
miRNA expression was quantified by real-time RT-PCR with miRNA primer hsa-miR-93-5p or control primer U6 (Exiqon) and ExiLENT™ SYBR-Green Master Mix (Exiqon). The rest of the procedure was as described above.
Growth curve analysis using Alamar blue
Growth of transfected cells was monitored using the Alamar blue assay. Briefly, addition of the Alamar blue reagent (Invitrogen) to culture medium at a ratio of 1:10 was carried out 24 h post-transfection. Cells were then incubated for 3 h at 37°C and 5% CO2. Fluorescence intensity was then measured at 570 nm (excitation) and 585 nm (emission) wavelengths on a microplate reader (SpectraMax; Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA, USA). Subsequently, cells were replenished with fresh medium and the assay was repeated at 48 and 72 h.
Migration and invasion assays
Cells were harvested 48 h post-transfection. Cells (2×104) were then seeded in 200 μl of serum-free RPMI medium into the upper chamber of hydrated polycarbonate membrane insets with 8 μm pores (Corning, Corning, NY, USA) for migration assay (18 h) or into hydrated matrigel invasion chambers (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA) for the invasion assay (20 h). Subsequently, cells were fixed with 100% methanol followed by staining with crystal violet (0.5% w/v). To determine the number of cells that had migrated or invaded, images from the center and four peripheral fields on the membrane were captured using a Nikon SMZ1500 stereomicroscope at ×10 magnification and counted.
Cell adhesion assay
96-well plates were coated with 20 μg/ml collagen type 1 (Invitrogen) overnight at 4°C. Subsequently, wells were blocked with 1% BSA for 1 h after washing in phosphate buffered saline (PBS). Cells (5×104) (48 h post-transfection) were then seeded/well (in duplicates) in 100 μl of RPMI with 10% FBS, and allowed to adhere for 40 min at 37°C with 5% CO2. Following incubation, non-adherent cells in only one replicate were removed by washing with PBS. MTS reagent was then mixed with serum-free RPMI at a ratio of 1:5, and the wells were replaced with this MTS reagent mixture and incubated for a further 2 h. Following incubation, the OD (absorbance) was read at 590 nm and the percentage of adherent cells was calculated by the formula: [OD of washed well/OD of non-washed well] × 100.
TargetScan prediction
miR-93 gene targets were predicted by the TargetScan human database (release 7.1) using default parameters (http://www.targetscan.org).
3′UTR plasmid luciferase assay
Cells (3×104) were plated in 24-well plates and incubated overnight. The next day, 30 nM of negative control mimic or miR-93-5p mimic was co-transfected with 0.3 μg of WNK1 plasmid (GeneCopoeia, Rockville, MD, USA) using Lipofectamine 2000. After 24 h, transfected cells were segregated and re-seeded. After another 24 h post-incubation, the luciferase assay was performed using the Luc-Pair duo luciferase assay kit (GeneCopoeia). The luminescence was read using a spectrophotometer and firefly luciferase was normalized to Renilla luciferase.
Western blot analysis
Protein was extracted at 72 h post-transfection using the RIPA buffer (Pierce, Waltham, MA, USA) and quantified by the Bradford method (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA). Each sample containing 30 μg of protein was denatured at 95°C for 5 min and separated on a 4–20% Mini-Protean TGX precast gel (Bio-Rad Laboratories). Proteins were transferred onto a PVDF membrane, which was blocked with 5% non-fat milk for 1 h at room temperature and washed well, before incubation with rabbit polyclonal anti-WNK1 antibody (1:1000; Abcam, Cambridge, UK) overnight at 4°C. The next day, secondary anti-rabbit HRP conjugated antibody (Pierce) was added to the blots and incubated for 1 h at room temperature. Subsequently, development of the blot was carried out using the SuperSignal West Pico chemiluminescence susbtrate (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) on an automatic film processor. The bands were quantified on a densitometer (Bio-Rad Laboratories) using Quantity One software. To ensure that equal amounts of protein were loaded into each well, the blot was stripped and re-probed with anti-β-actin antibody (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) to detect β-actin, the housekeeping protein.
Statistical analysis
The statistical analysis was performed with GraphPad Prism5 software. Experiments were carried out in triplicates and repeated at least two independent times. Unpaired, two tailed Student’s t-test was used for analysis of data except the growth curves which were analysed by two-way ANOVA. Results are represented as mean ± SD and were considered significant at P<0.05.
Results
Overexpression of miR-93 alters cell migration, invasion and adhesion
Metastasis involves spread of cancer cells from the primary tumor site to distant organs by invading adjacent tissues and extravasating into the circulation (13). We evaluated the effect of miR-93 overexpression on migration, invasion and adhesion, since they are major factors that define the metastatic nature of the cancer cells. We also assessed the cell proliferation as it is a hallmark of cancer.
We first overexpressed miR-93 in MDA-MB-231 using miR-93-5p mimics. The expression of miR-93-5p following transfection was found to be increased by 60-fold (Fig. 1A). Although overexpression of miR-93-5p in MDA-MB-231 cells did not alter cell proliferation (Fig. 1B), decreased cell migration (Fig. 1C) and cell invasion (Fig. 1D), with increased adhesion of cells to collagen type 1 (Fig. 1E) was observed. In addition, overexpression of miR-93 decreased the expression of stem cell genes, JAK1 and STAT3 and TGFBR2, but increased the CLDN1, CLDN3 and CDH1 mRNA expression (Fig. 2).
miR-93 knockdown enhances cell migration and invasion
Given that overexpression of miR-93 decreased cell migration and invasion, we inhibited miR-93-5p in MDA-MB-231 cells in order to assess whether this effect could be reversed. Knockdown of miR-93-5p was achieved by transfection of LNA-miR-93-5p inhibitor into the cells and the knockdown efficiency was estimated by qPCR to be ~68% (Fig. 3A). As expected, inhibition of miR-93 had no effect on cell growth (Fig. 3B), but increased cell migration (Fig. 3C) and invasion (Fig. 3D) compared to scrambled transfected cells (controls).
WNK1 is a target of miR-93-5p
miRNA-mRNA target prediction (TargetScan) revealed that several members of the miR106b~25 and miR-17 family including miR-93, could target two protein kinases, namely WNK1 and WNK3. Since WNK1 is ubiquitously expressed (14) compared to WNK3, we examined the effect of miR-93 on WNK1 expression. Overexpression of miR-93-5p significantly decreased the expression of WNK1 protein (Fig. 4A), suggesting that WNK1 may be a direct or indirect target of miR-93. On the contrary, inhibition of miR-93-5p resulted in a modest increase in WNK1 protein expression (Fig. 4B). In order to determine if WNK1 is a putative target of miR-93, we performed 3′UTR luciferase assay, which confirmed that miR-93 binds directly to the 3′UTR of WNK1 gene and inhibited its expression (Fig. 4C).
WNK1 knockdown decreased cell migration and invasion
In order to evaluate the effect of WNK1 depletion in MDA-MB-231, we inhibited WNK1 expression using siRNA and performed cell migration and invasion assays. Although siRNA-mediated silencing of the WNK1 gene induced no alteration in cell proliferation (Fig. 5A) or migration (Fig. 5B), a significant reduction in the invasive ability of the cells was observed (Fig. 5C).
Discussion
miRNAs are known to function as tumor suppressors or oncogenes that regulate pathogenesis and progression in several cancers, including breast cancer (15). Thus, miRNAs and/or their targets may serve as novel anticancer targets for therapeutic intervention. In the present study, overexpression of miR-93 was observed to decrease migration, invasion and increase adhesion in parallel, suggesting that miR-93 functions as a tumor suppressor and a negative regulator of metastasis in MDA-MB-231 cells. On the other hand, inhibition of miR-93 in MDA-MB-231 cells increased cell migratory capability and invasive potential, further supporting the notion that miR-93 and its gene targets are involved in inhibiting metastasis. Our results are consistent with Liu et al (11), who reported that overexpression of miR-93 inhibited cell invasion while inhibition of miR-93 promoted invasion in SUM159 cells, another claudin low TNBC cell line. In addition, the same authors found that induction of miR-93 in SUM159 cells inhibited metastasis in NOD/SCID mice, while it promoted tumor growth in MCF-7 cells suggesting that the role of miR-93 was both cell line- and differentiation state specific. Nonetheless, the role of miR-93 in MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells has not been reported previously.
Induction of EMT has been shown to increase characteristics of stem/progenitor cells (16) and high miR-93 (and miR-106b) expression has been found to be associated with stem cell-related genes (17) and EMT-related genes (18) in breast cancer, suggesting that miR-93 and miR-106b regulate these two processes. MDA-MB-231 cells are known to contain a higher percentage of EMT-like CD44+/CD24− cancer stem cells that are associated with their increased malignant and metastatic phenotype (19). However, in the present study, miR-93 overexpression in MDA-MB-231 cells was associated with decreased expression of stem cell-related genes (JAK1 and STAT3) and TGFBR2 (TGFβ signaling), and increased expression of epithelial markers (CDH1, CLDN1 and CLDN3), suggesting its involvement in the MET process as reported earlier by Liu et al (11). Furthermore, miR-93 is known to regulate MET during re-programming of fibroblasts to IPS cells via downregulation of its target TGFBR2, (20) suggesting that miR-93 may be critical for MET in various scenarios. Moreover, miR-93 (and miR-17 family) has been observed to regulate differentiation of stem cells during embryonic development in mice, via downregulating the expression of STAT3 (21), suggesting that miR-93 regulates differentiation of stem cells through STAT3 in different cell types.
In breast cancer, miR-93 has been identified as a basal sub-type specific miRNA by a meta-analysis involving three independent studies (6). However, another recent meta-analysis has also revealed that the miR-17 family of miRNAs that consists of 6 miRNAs (miR-17-5p, miR-20a, miR-20b, miR-106a, miR-106b and miR-93) inhibit metastasis of basal-like tumors by repressing genes involved in EMT (22). The authors showed that overexpression of miR-17-5p suppresses breast cancer metastasis by inhibiting the expression of pro-metastatic genes. In addition, several studies have shown that in breast cancer, miR-17-5p is a tumor suppressor and inhibits proliferation (23), and that miR-17/20 has an anti-invasive role (24). Since miR-93 shares the same seed sequence with miR-17, it is possible that miR-93 inhibits breast cancer metastasis via the same gene targets.
Published literature suggests that miR-93 can act as a tumor suppressor or an oncogene depending on the tumor type, and thus, has contradictory roles in promoting or inhibiting metastasis. In colon cancer, overexpression of miR-93 has been shown to suppress the proliferation and colony forming ability of colon cancer stem cells (25) and also inhibit growth, migration, invasion and recurrence of colorectal cancer (26,27), while miR-93 promotes proliferation, migration and invasion of nasopharyngeal cancer (28). Nevertheless, what remains consistent are that the gene targets of the miRNAs from the miR-106b~25 cluster and miR-17 family across several cancers (for example, E2F1, CCNB1, p21, BIM, TGFBR2 are regulated by miR-93 in breast, colorectal, gastric and nasopharyngeal cancers among others) (26,29–31), suggesting that the miRNA expression is differentially regulated (inhibited or overexpressed) in cancer, resulting in upregulation or downregulation of its targets (that are oncogenes or tumor suppressors respectively), which are critical for cancer progression.
Humans contain four different WNK genes (WNK1-4), among which only WNK1 is ubiquitously expressed in all tissues (14). Loss of WNK1 during development has been shown to result in embryonic lethality in mice (32) and zebrafish embryos (33), suggesting that WNK1 is critical for development. Among the WNKs, WNK1 is known to interact with diverse signaling pathways such as Smad/Tgfb (34), Erk5/MAPK (35) and PI-3K pathways (36) to regulate cell proliferation, survival, angiogenesis and metastasis, suggesting that WNK1 has important roles in tumorigenesis. Studies have shown that WNK1, is an important protein kinase that is required for mitosis and abscission (37), migration and invasion of neural tumor cells via ganglioside GD3 (38), migration of glioma cells (39) and migration, angiogenesis and EMT in endothelial cells (40). Furthermore, WNK1 has been shown to regulate Slug, Zeb1 and β-catenin in endothelial cells (40), with the expression levels of Slug increasing in the presence of WNK1. Slug has well-known roles in tumor invasion (41) and thus, provides an important link between WNK1 and metastasis.
In addition, silencing of WNK1 in a mouse progenitor cell line inhibited differentiation of the cells into neuronal and glial lineage, and upregulated the expression of stem cells/progenitor marker nestin (42). Recently, inhibition of ERK5 or inhibition of genes that phosphorylate and activate ERK5, such as MAP3K2 and WNK1 has been shown to reduce tumor growth and metastasis in prostate cancer in vivo (43). Furthermore, depletion of AKT/WNK1 has been shown to revert EMT and inhibit cell migration in lung cancer cells (44). Together, these studies also highlight the importance of WNK1 in the regulation of differentiation, tumor growth and metastasis.
While miR-93 has several gene targets, we postulate that the effects on migration and invasion following miR-93 overexpression were possibly mediated via decreasing WNK1 (identified from target prediction). Hence, we inhibited WNK1 expression using siRNA in the MDA-MB-231 cells and observed decreased invasive ability, but not cell migration, suggesting that the effects of miR-93 overexpression in reducing cell invasion was mediated via decreasing the expression of WNK1 post-transcriptionally (Fig. 6). It would appear that decrease in migration observed after miR-93 overexpression was not brought about by WNK1, but possibly through other miR-93 gene targets that remain to be elucidated.
In summary, we have demonstrated that overexpression of miR-93 decrease cell migration and invasion in MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells in vitro. We have identified WNK1 as a novel target of miR-93 that mediates cell invasion. Further in vivo studies are required to ascertain the miR-93-WNK1-metastasis cascade that has potential implications in breast cancer therapy.
Acknowledgements
The present study was supported by the Ministry of Education grant (MOE2013-T2-1-129). Jia Pei Lim is a recipient of the Ong Hin Tiang Scholarship in Cancer Research.
References
Bombonati A and Sgroi DC: The molecular pathology of breast cancer progression. J Pathol. 223:307–317. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : | |
André F and Zielinski CC: Optimal strategies for the treatment of metastatic triple-negative breast cancer with currently approved agents. Ann Oncol. 23(Suppl 6): vi46–vi51. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Lin Y, Liu AY, Fan C, Zheng H, Li Y, Zhang C, Wu S, Yu D, Huang Z, Liu F, et al: MicroRNA-33b inhibits breast cancer metastasis by targeting HMGA2, SALL4 and Twist1. Sci Rep. 5:99952015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Bartel DP: MicroRNAs: Target recognition and regulatory functions. Cell. 136:215–233. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Zhong X, Coukos G and Zhang L: miRNAs in human cancer. Methods Mol Biol. 822:295–306. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar | |
van Schooneveld E, Wildiers H, Vergote I, Vermeulen PB, Dirix LY and Van Laere SJ: Dysregulation of microRNAs in breast cancer and their potential role as prognostic and predictive biomarkers in patient management. Breast Cancer Res. 17:212015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Fang L, Du WW, Yang W, Rutnam ZJ, Peng C, Li H, O’Malley YQ, Askeland RW, Sugg S, Liu M, et al: MiR-93 enhances angiogenesis and metastasis by targeting LATS2. Cell Cycle. 11:4352–4365. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Smith AL, Iwanaga R, Drasin DJ, Micalizzi DS, Vartuli RL, Tan AC and Ford HL: The miR-106b-25 cluster targets Smad7, activates TGF-β signaling, and induces EMT and tumor initiating cell characteristics downstream of Six1 in human breast cancer. Oncogene. 31:5162–5171. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Hu J, Xu J, Wu Y, Chen Q, Zheng W, Lu X, Zhou C and Jiao D: Identification of microRNA-93 as a functional dysregulated miRNA in triple-negative breast cancer. Tumour Biol. 36:251–258. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Kolacinska A, Morawiec J, Pawlowska Z, Szemraj J, Szymanska B, Malachowska B, Morawiec Z, Morawiec-Sztandera A, Pakula L, Kubiak R, et al: Association of microRNA-93, 190, 200b and receptor status in core biopsies from stage III breast cancer patients. DNA Cell Biol. 33:624–629. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Liu S, Patel SH, Ginestier C, Ibarra I, Martin-Trevino R, Bai S, McDermott SP, Shang L, Ke J, Ou SJ, et al: MicroRNA93 regulates proliferation and differentiation of normal and malignant breast stem cells. PLoS Genet. 8:e10027512012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Livak KJ and Schmittgen TD: Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(−Delta Delta C(T)) method. Methods. 25:402–408. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Kang Y and Massagué J: Epithelial-mesenchymal transitions: Twist in development and metastasis. Cell. 118:277–279. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Moniz S and Jordan P: Emerging roles for WNK kinases in cancer. Cell Mol Life Sci. 67:1265–1276. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Wang W and Luo YP: MicroRNAs in breast cancer: Oncogene and tumor suppressors with clinical potential. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 16:18–31. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Mani SA, Guo W, Liao MJ, Eaton EN, Ayyanan A, Zhou AY, Brooks M, Reinhard F, Zhang CC, Shipitsin M, et al: The epithelial-mesenchymal transition generates cells with properties of stem cells. Cell. 133:704–715. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Wong DJ, Liu H, Ridky TW, Cassarino D, Segal E and Chang HY: Module map of stem cell genes guides creation of epithelial cancer stem cells. Cell Stem Cell. 2:333–344. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Sarrió D, Rodriguez-Pinilla SM, Hardisson D, Cano A, Moreno-Bueno G and Palacios J: Epithelial-mesenchymal transition in breast cancer relates to the basal-like phenotype. Cancer Res. 68:989–997. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Kuperwasser C, Dessain S, Bierbaum BE, Garnet D, Sperandio K, Gauvin GP, Naber SP, Weinberg RA and Rosenblatt M: A mouse model of human breast cancer metastasis to human bone. Cancer Res. 65:6130–6138. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Li Z, Yang CS, Nakashima K and Rana TM: Small RNA-mediated regulation of iPS cell generation. EMBO J. 30:823–834. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Foshay KM and Gallicano GI: miR-17 family miRNAs are expressed during early mammalian development and regulate stem cell differentiation. Dev Biol. 326:431–443. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Fan M, Sethuraman A, Brown M, Sun W and Pfeffer LM: Systematic analysis of metastasis-associated genes identifies miR-17-5p as a metastatic suppressor of basal-like breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 146:487–502. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Hossain A, Kuo MT and Saunders GF: Mir-17-5p regulates breast cancer cell proliferation by inhibiting translation of AIB1 mRNA. Mol Cell Biol. 26:8191–8201. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Yu Z, Willmarth NE, Zhou J, Katiyar S, Wang M, Liu Y, McCue PA, Quong AA, Lisanti MP and Pestell RG: microRNA 17/20 inhibits cellular invasion and tumor metastasis in breast cancer by heterotypic signaling. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 107:8231–8236. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Yu XF, Zou J, Bao ZJ and Dong J: miR-93 suppresses proliferation and colony formation of human colon cancer stem cells. World J Gastroenterol. 17:4711–4717. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Yang IP, Tsai HL, Hou MF, Chen KC, Tsai PC, Huang SW, Chou WW, Wang JY and Juo SH: MicroRNA-93 inhibits tumor growth and early relapse of human colorectal cancer by affecting genes involved in the cell cycle. Carcinogenesis. 33:1522–1530. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Tang Q, Zou Z, Zou C, Zhang Q, Huang R, Guan X, Li Q, Han Z, Wang D, Wei H, et al: MicroRNA-93 suppress colorectal cancer development via Wnt/β-catenin pathway downregulating. Tumour Biol. 36:1701–1710. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Xu YF, Mao YP, Li YQ, Ren XY, He QM, Tang XR, Sun Y, Liu N and Ma J: MicroRNA-93 promotes cell growth and invasion in nasopharyngeal carcinoma by targeting disabled homolog-2. Cancer Lett. 363:146–155. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Zhang H and Yan X: Cantharidin modulates the E2F1/MCM7-miR-106b-93/p21-PTEN signaling axis in MCF-7 breast cancer cells. Oncol Lett. 10:2849–2855. 2015. | |
Petrocca F, Vecchione A and Croce CM: Emerging role of miR-106b-25/miR-17-92 clusters in the control of transforming growth factor beta signaling. Cancer Res. 68:8191–8194. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Lyu X, Fang W, Cai L, Zheng H, Ye Y, Zhang L, Li J, Peng H, Cho WC, Wang E, et al: TGFβR2 is a major target of miR-93 in nasopharyngeal carcinoma aggressiveness. Mol Cancer. 13:512014. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Xie J, Wu T, Xu K, Huang IK, Cleaver O and Huang CL: Endothelial-specific expression of WNK1 kinase is essential for angiogenesis and heart development in mice. Am J Pathol. 175:1315–1327. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Lai JG, Tsai SM, Tu HC, Chen WC, Kou FJ, Lu JW, Wang HD, Huang CL and Yuh CH: Zebrafish WNK lysine deficient protein kinase 1 (wnk1) affects angiogenesis associated with VEGF signaling. PLoS One. 9:e1061292014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Lee BH, Chen W, Stippec S and Cobb MH: Biological cross-talk between WNK1 and the transforming growth factor beta-Smad signaling pathway. J Biol Chem. 282:17985–17996. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Wilson FH, Disse-Nicodème S, Choate KA, Ishikawa K, Nelson-Williams C, Desitter I, Gunel M, Milford DV, Lipkin GW, Achard JM, et al: Human hypertension caused by mutations in WNK kinases. Science. 293:1107–1112. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Xu BE, Stippec S, Chu PY, Lazrak A, Li XJ, Lee BH, English JM, Ortega B, Huang CL and Cobb MH: WNK1 activates SGK1 to regulate the epithelial sodium channel. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 102:10315–10320. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Tu SW, Bugde A, Luby-Phelps K and Cobb MH: WNK1 is required for mitosis and abscission. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 108:1385–1390. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Zeng G, Gao L and Yu RK: Reduced cell migration, tumor growth and experimental metastasis of rat F-11 cells whose expression of GD3-synthase is suppressed. Int J Cancer. 88:53–57. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Zhu W, Begum G, Pointer K, Clark PA, Yang SS, Lin SH, Kahle KT, Kuo JS and Sun D: WNK1-OSR1 kinase-mediated phospho-activation of Na+-K+-2Cl− cotransporter facilitates glioma migration. Mol Cancer. 13:312014. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Dbouk HA, Weil LM, Perera GK, Dellinger MT, Pearson G, Brekken RA and Cobb MH: Actions of the protein kinase WNK1 on endothelial cells are differentially mediated by its substrate kinases OSR1 and SPAK. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 111:15999–16004. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Alves CC, Carneiro F, Hoefler H and Becker KF: Role of the epithelial-mesenchymal transition regulator Slug in primary human cancers. Front Biosci (Landmark Ed). 14:3035–3050. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Sun X, Gao L, Yu RK and Zeng G: Down-regulation of WNK1 protein kinase in neural progenitor cells suppresses cell proliferation and migration. J Neurochem. 99:1114–1121. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Fulford L, Milewski D, Ustiyan V, Ravishankar N, Cai Y, Le T, Masineni S, Kasper S, Aronow B, Kalinichenko VV, et al: The transcription factor FOXF1 promotes prostate cancer by stimulating the mitogen-activated protein kinase ERK5. Sci Signal. 9:ra482016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Hsu YL, Hung JY, Chiang SY, Jian SF, Wu CY, Lin YS, Tsai YM, Chou SH, Tsai MJ and Kuo PL: Lung cancer-derived galectin-1 contributes to cancer associated fibroblast-mediated cancer progression and immune suppression through TDO2/kynurenine axis. Oncotarget. 7:27584–27598. 2016.PubMed/NCBI |