In vivo evaluation of tumour acidosis for assessing the early metabolic response and onset of resistance to dichloroacetate by using magnetic resonance pH imaging

  • Authors:
    • Annasofia Anemone
    • Lorena Consolino
    • Laura Conti
    • Francesca Reineri
    • Federica Cavallo
    • Silvio Aime
    • Dario Livio Longo
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: June 7, 2017     https://doi.org/10.3892/ijo.2017.4029
  • Pages:498-506
Metrics: HTML 0 views | PDF 0 views     Cited By (CrossRef): 0 citations

Abstract

Dichloroacetate (DCA) can reverse the glycolytic phenotype that is responsible of increased lactate production and extracellular pH acidification in cancer cells. Magnetic resonance imaging-chemical exchange saturation transfer (MRI-CEST) pH mapping is a novel non-invasive imaging approach that can measure in vivo extracellular tumour pH. We examined whether MRI-CEST pH mapping can monitor in vivo changes in tumour acidosis for assessing treatment response to DCA. Cell viability and extracellular pH were assessed in TS/A breast cancer cells treated with 1-10 mM DCA for 24 h in normoxia or hypoxia (1% O2) conditions. Extracellular tumour pH values were measured in vivo by MRI-CEST pH mapping of TS/A tumour-bearing mice before, three days and fifteen days after DCA or saline treatment. Reduced extracellular acidification and vitality were observed in DCA-treated TS/A cells. Tumour-bearing mice showed a marked and significant increase of tumour extracellular pH at 3 days post-DCA treatment, reflecting DCA-induced glycolysis inhibition, as confirmed by reduced lactate production. After 15 days of DCA treatment, the onset of resistance to DCA was observed, with recover of tumour extracellular acidification and lactate levels that returned to baseline values. A significant correlation was observed between tumour extracellular pH values and lactate levels (r= -0.97, P<0.05). These results suggest that MRI-CEST pH imaging is a promising tool to monitor the early response and efficacy of cancer metabolic targeting drugs.

Introduction

It is well known that the extracellular pH (pHe) within the microenvironment of tumours is significantly lower (more acidic) compared with that of normal tissues (1). Although several factors play a role in the acidification process, it is well accepted that the major contribution arises from a shift in the ATP generation; according to the Warburg effect, ATP is produced via aerobic glycolysis even in presence of oxygen (2). In this contest, poor vascularisation and increased activity of plasma membrane ion pumps and transporters (H+-ATPases, the Na+-H+ exchanger NHE1 and the monocarboxylate-H+ efflux co-transporters MCT1 and MCT4) contribute to the extracellular acidification of most, but not all tumours (3). Many studies on solid tumours and in particular on breast tumours suggested that a glycolytic environment is related not only to uncontrolled proliferation and evasion of apoptosis induction, but also to the expansion through the extra-cellular matrix, the increase of the metastatic potential and the promotion of angiogenesis (4). Therefore, novel drugs addressing specific aspects of the deregulated tumour metabolism have been proposed for inhibiting tumour growth and survival.

Dichloroacetate (DCA), a mitochondria-targeting small molecule of 150 Da used to treat lactic acidosis, can reverse this cancer-specific metabolic remodelling (5). DCA inhibits pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase (PDK) whose expression is high in many cancers, causing pyruvate conversion into lactate (6). DCA-mediated inhibition of PDK re-establishes metabolism of pyruvate into the tricarboxylic acid cycle and decreases the lactate accumulation and production. Thus, DCA increases the glucose oxidation therefore promoting apoptosis and blocking tumour proliferation (7,8). Several clinical studies tested the DCA antitumour efficacy and its safety in patients with advanced solid tumours (9). Overall, these studies reported that oral DCA is well tolerated and safe, it reduces lactate levels and it can act as an apoptosis sensitizer in combination with cytotoxic treatments.

Despite the specific mechanism of action of DCA on tumour glycolysis, tumour response to DCA treatment has conventionally been assessed through simple measurements of changes in tumour size by using morphological imaging techniques such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computed tomography (CT). However, the assessment of changes in tumour volume does not provide indications on tumour acidosis variations induced by metabolism-targeting drugs. Several MRI methods have been proposed for non-invasive measurements of in vivo tumour pH (10). In particular, 31P-magnetic resonance spectroscopy (31P-MRS) allows measuring intracellular and extracellular pH changes from the chemical shift of endogenous phosphate or of exogenous agents, but with poor spatial resolution (11). Gd-based contrast agents that exhibit a pH-dependent relaxivity have been exploited for measuring tumour pH in a rat glioma model, but a limitation of this approach is related to the need of injecting two Gd-based contrast agents for accurate pH measurements (12). Hyperpolarized 13C-bicarbonate can provide pHe map with high sensitivity (13), while several hyperpolarised molecules can provide insight into metabolism in both cells and animals (1418). However, this technique is expensive, limited by low spatial resolution and requires sophisticated instrumentations that are not easily available in the clinical setting.

Recently, chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) imaging has been proposed as a novel MRI-based technique and several agents have been considered for assessing tumour metabolism and pHe (1923). Among them, clinical approved radiographic contrast agents and heterocyclic compounds have been exploited for measuring pH and pathological-induced pH changes (2428). In addition, MRI-CEST pH mapping was demonstrated to be an excellent tool to investigate the relationship between glycolysis and acidosis at clinical magnetic field (29).

In this study, we investigated whether DCA-induced changes in metabolism and tumour acidosis in a murine breast cancer model can be monitored non-invasively by MRI-CEST pH mapping.

Materials and methods

Cell culture

TS/A cells, derived from a spontaneous BALB/c mammary tumour, were grown in RPMI-1640 medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 100 U/ml penicillin and 100 μg/ml streptomycin (Pen/Strep) and 2 mM L-glutamine (30). 4T1 cells, a BALB/c-derived mouse mammary carcinoma corresponding to stage IV of human breast cancer, were purchased from American Type Culture Collection (ATCC LGC Standards, Sesto San Giovanni, Italy) and cultured as TS/A cells. TUBO cells were derived from a lobular carcinoma arising spontaneously in a BALB-neuT mouse and were grown in DMEM medium supplemented with 20% FBS and Pen/Strep (31).

J774 non-tumour cell line (purchased from ATCC) was grown in DMEM medium supplemented with 10% FBS, Pen/Strep and L-glutamine. All the cell lines were cultured in a humidified atmosphere (37°C, 5% CO2).

Cell vitality test

The cytotoxic effect of DCA (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) on cells was analysed with the CellTiter-Blue Cell Viability Assay (Promega Corp., Madison, WI, USA). Briefly, TS/A (5×103) cells were plated in 96-well culture plates and after 24 h of incubation were treated with DCA (1, 5 and 10 mM) for 24 h. The non-tumour cell line J774 (30×103) was used as control and treated in the same way. Afterwards, cells were washed with PBS and then CellTiter-Blue reagent was added to each well. Fluorescence was measured at 560Ex/590Em using a 96-well plate reader. Each assay was repeated at least three times.

pH measurement in normoxia and hypoxia condition

TS/A cells were seeded in 60-mm culture dish with a final volume of 3 ml at a density of 4×105 cells. After 24 h of incubation in 20% O2 (normoxia) or 1% O2 (hypoxia) (New Brunswick™ Galaxy® 48 R, Eppendorf S.r.l., Milan, Italy) cells were treated with a solution of DCA (1, 5 and 10 mM) and kept in the culture medium for additional 24 h. Then the culture medium was collected and the pH was immediately measured using a pH meter (Hamilton® Slim Trode, GR, Switzerland) previously calibrated. The non-tumour cell line J774 underwent the same procedure. Each experiment was performed in triplicate.

FACS analysis

The cell cycle perturbations were analysed by propidium iodide (PI) DNA staining. TS/A cells (5×105) were treated with DCA (1, 5 and 10 mM) for 24 h. At the end of each treatment, cells were collected after a centrifugation (200 × g, 5 min) and then fixed in ethanol (70%, 3 min, 4°C). Ethanol-suspended cells were diluted with phosphate buffered saline (PBS) and then centrifuged to remove residual ethanol (471 × g, 5 min). For cell cycle analysis, the pellets were suspended in 0.1 ml of PBS containing 50 μg/ml of PI, 100 μg/ml of RNase A and 0.05% of Triton X-100 and incubated at 37°C for 40 minutes. Cell cycle profiles were studied using a CyanADP flow cytometer and analysed with Summit 3.4 software (Beckman Coulter, Milano, Italy) and BD FACSuite software (Becton Dickinson, Milano, Italy). Each assay was repeated a minimum of three times.

Animal experiments

BALB/c female mice (Charles River Laboratories Italia S.r.l., Calco, Italy) were maintained in the animal facility of the Dept. Molecular Biotechnology and Health Sciences, University of Turin, under specific pathogen-free conditions. All animal studies were approved by the University Ethics Committee in accordance with the European guidelines under directive 2010/63.

Mice were inoculated subcutaneously with 2.5×105 TS/A mammary adenocarcinoma cells on both flanks. When the tumours were approximately 60 mm3, TS/A tumour-bearing mice were randomly divided in two groups: untreated group that received drinking water and intraperitoneal injections of PBS, and DCA-treated group that received DCA by oral administration of 0.45 g/l (100 mg/kg/day) and also by intraperitoneal injections of 50 g/l (200 mg/kg/day) (32). DCA or PBS solutions were administered every day after baseline measurements. All mice were scanned at day 0 (untreated n=10 mice, treated n=8 mice), 3 days (untreated n=10 mice, treated n=8 mice) and 15 days (untreated n=7 mice, treated n=5 mice) post-treatment. At each time point post-treatment, three mice per group were sacrificed and tumour tissues were excised for lactate level quantification.

For MRI acquisition mice were anesthetized and the breath rate was monitored by an air pillow placed below the animal (SA Instruments, Stony Brook, NY, USA). MRI-CEST pH mapping was performed upon i.v. injection of 4 g I/kg b.w. iopamidol (Bracco Imaging SpA, Colleretto Giacosa, Italy) into the tail vein through a 27-gauge needle.

MRICEST pH-mapping acquisition and analysis

MR images were acquired with a Bruker 7T Avance 300 MRI scanner (Bruker Biospin, Ettlingen, Germany) equipped with a 30-mm 1H birdcage coil before starting the treatment, after 3 and 15 days of treatment.

Anatomical T2w images were acquired with a Fast Spin Echo (FSE) sequence and the same geometry was used for the following CEST experiments. CEST images were acquired before and after iopamidol i.v. injection with a single shot FSE sequence with centric encoding preceded by a continuous-wave saturation pulse (power: 3μT, duration: 5 sec) on a central tumour slice (field-of-view: 3 cm, matrix: 128×128, in-plane resolution: 234 μm, slice thickness: 1.5 mm). CEST images were analysed using homemade MATLAB scripts (Mathworks, Inc., Natick, MA, USA). Briefly, saturation transfer effects were calculated upon irradiating at 4.2 and at 5.5 ppm, respectively, and post-contrast ST maps were subtracted to pre-contrast ST ones, to obtain the corresponding ST contrast difference (ΔST) maps. The pixel-by-pixel extracellular pH (pHe) maps were calculated using the ratio between the two contrast difference maps at 4.2 and 5.5 ppm according to the previously described method (24). The calculated pHe maps were superimposed to the anatomical reference image.

A novel estimate, dubbed acidity score, was calculated for taking into account the heterogeneity of pHe distribution values within the tumour region. The tumour pixels were clustered into three groups: group I for pixels showing pHe values >7.0, group II for pixels showing pHe values >6.7 and <7.0, group III for pixels showing pHe values <6.7. The percentage of pixels of each group was multiplied by a factor between 1 and 3, to obtain the acidity score, in accordance to the equation:

The acidity score ranges from 1 (less acidic) to 3 (more acidic), describing tumour regions with different acidosis levels.
Survival curves

A second cohort of female BALB/c mice was inoculated with 2.5×105 TS/A cells into the right flank for long-term effect following DCA treatment. After the tumour reached 1 mm mean diameter, animals were randomized into two groups: untreated (n=9 mice) and DCA-treated (n=11 mice). DCA-treated group received DCA by oral administration (100 mg/kg/day) and also by intraperitoneal injection (200 mg/kg/day) every day. Untreated group received equal volumes of PBS. Mice were monitored every day and volumes were measured using a calliper and calculated from orthogonal measurements of external dimensions as (width2 × length)/2. Mice were euthanized when tumour volume reached values around 600 mm3.

Lactate assay

TS/A cells were seeded in 60-mm culture dish with a final volume of 3 ml and incubated under standard cell culture condition overnight for 24 h. Thereafter, cells were treated with DCA for 24 h and culture media was collected and tested for lactate level following the manufacturer's instructions of Lactate assay kit (MAK064 Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA).

After MRI acquisition, three mice per each time point and group were sacrificed and tumour tissues were excised and frozen in liquid nitrogen. Tumour tissue was explanted after animal sacrifice and it was frozen in liquid nitrogen. Tumour was then homogenized on ice in 4 volumes of lactate assay buffer; the sample was centrifuged at 13.000 × g for 10 min to remove insoluble material and deproteinized with a 10 kDa MWCO spin filter to remove endogenous lactate dehydrogenase. The soluble fraction was then assayed by Lactate assay kit.

Statistical analysis

Calculations were performed using GraphPad Prism (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA, USA) software package. Significance between DCA-treated and control groups was determined by one-way analysis of variance, followed by post-hoc tests with the Dunnett's multiple comparison test. Correlation analysis was performed using Pearson's r correlation coefficient. Data are presented as mean ± SD unless otherwise stated. Statistical significance was established at P<0.05.

Results

DCA metabolic inhibition impairs TS/A proliferation but not the cell cycle

In order to investigate the metabolic inhibition efficiency of DCA, a panel of breast cancer cell lines was treated with several concentrations of DCA for 24 h under normoxia condition. As shown in Fig. 1, after 24 h of treatment, TS/A, 4T1 and TUBO cancer cell lines showed a reduction in their metabolic capacity even at low concentration, whereas the non-tumour J774 control cell line was not affected (Fig. 1D). The response of TS/A breast cancer after 24 h of DCA treatment was dose-dependent (Fig. 1A) and a significant reduction of cell vitality was already observed at 5 mM DCA concentration.

Furthermore, compared to the other cell lines, untreated TS/A cells produced significantly higher level of lactate (Fig. 1E), hence reflecting a more glycolytic phenotype that could explain their higher sensitivity to DCA treatment. On the basis of these observations, TS/A cell line was selected for subsequent in vitro and in vivo studies.

DCA effect was also investigated under hypoxia (1% O2) to mimic in vivo tumour hypoxic conditions. A significant decrease in TS/A vitality was observed for all the investigated DCA concentrations, compared to untreated cells (Fig. 1F).

In order to verify if the effect exerted by DCA on cancer cell vitality was due to a perturbation of their cell cycle, as reported for glioblastoma, glioma, non-small cell lung cancer and other cancer cell lines (3336), TS/A cells were incubated with DCA for 24 h, then stained with PI and analysed by flow cytometry. As shown in the graph (Fig. 2D) and in the representative histograms reported in Fig. 2E, DCA did not affect the cell cycle of TS/A cells, although the amount of cells in the G1/G0 phase decreased from 51.6% (untreated cells) to 45.9% in the presence of 10 mM DCA while cells in G2/M phase increased from 18.8% (untreated cells) to 23.1%. The amount of TS/A cells in the S phase did not change between untreated and treated with 10 mM of DCA. Moreover, the percentage of hypodiploid cells undergoing apoptosis-induced DNA fragmentation, represented by the sub-G1/G0 population, was very low in all the conditions analysed, and was not increased by DCA treatment. These data suggest that DCA can affect cell vitality through different mechanisms in different types of tumours, mainly acting as a metabolic agent.

DCA promotes extracellular pH alkalinisation in both normoxia and hypoxia conditions

Treatment of TS/A cells for 24 h in normoxic condition (Fig. 2A) resulted in a moderate but significant and constant increase of culture medium pH values (from 7.06±0.02 to 7.23±0.01) with increasing DCA concentrations. The increase of pHe was significantly more pronounced in the hypoxic condition (Fig. 3A) than in the normoxic condition. In fact, hypoxic condition resulted in lower pH of the culture medium for untreated TS/A cells in comparison to normoxic condition (pHe = 6.78±0.02). Moreover, DCA treatment resulted in an even higher increase of pHe up to 7.53±0.01 (P<0.001). The measured increase in extracellular pH displayed by TS/A cells after treatment is linked to the DCA-induced switch from glycolytic to more oxidative phenotype as evidenced by decreased lactate levels measured in the extracellular medium of TS/A cells. In particular, we observed a significant decrease in lactate production following DCA treatment in both normoxic and hypoxic conditions (Figs. 2B and 3B). Moreover, the in vitro anti-glycolytic effect of DCA revealed a strong and significant correlation between pH and lactate changes in normoxic condition (r= −0.98, P=<0.05, Fig. 2C), likely reflecting the impaired glycolytic activity that results in a reduced lactate production, hence acidification. A strong correlation was also found for cells treated in hypoxic condition even though not statistically significant (r= −0.93, P=0.07, Fig. 3C). Taken together, these data confirmed the in vitro reversal of the glycolytic phenotype following DCA treatment.

DCA does not influence tumour growth and survival

The in vivo antitumour activity of DCA was evaluated by measuring tumour growth in a group of TS/A tumour-bearing BALB/c mice that received drinking water and PBS intraperitoneal injection (untreated) or that were treated with DCA by oral administration and intraperitoneal injection every day for 3 or 15 consecutive days (Fig. 4A). DCA treatment slightly reduced the growth of TS/A breast tumours after three days of treatment (ΔVolume% = 70.7±38.6 and 83.1±15.7, for treated and untreated mice, respectively; P>0.05). This limited growth reduction is maintained up to 15 days of DCA treatment (ΔVolume% = 571.9±180.7 and 646.7±184.0, for untreated and treated mice, respectively; P>0.05) (Fig. 4B).

The survival study conducted in another group of mice revealed that DCA-treated mice survived slightly longer than the untreated mice (Fig. 4C), despite this difference not being statistically significant. These data suggest that DCA did not influence tumour growth and did not improve mouse survival for the TS/A tumour model.

DCA affects in vivo tumour acidosis and lactate production

A significant pHe increase was observed for treated mice in comparison to untreated ones after three days of DCA treatment (ΔpHe = +0.10±0.03 and −0.12±0.03 for treated and untreated, respectively, P<0.05, Fig. 5A). The same pHe variations were maintained also after 15 days of treatment, despite less marked (ΔpHe= +0.004±0.04 and −0.09±0.04 for treated and untreated, respectively, Fig. 5A). Representative MRI-CEST pHe images over imposed to anatomical images are shown in Fig. 6 for untreated (Fig. 6A) and treated (Fig. 6B) mice. Following DCA-treatment, an increase of the number of pixels with more neutral pHe values is visible, in contrast to untreated mice at both the investigated time points (i.e. after 3 and 15 days of DCA treatment).

To assess more precisely the heterogeneity of the extracellular pH distribution inside the tumour region, it was deemed of interest to calculate the acidity score as an index of spatial distribution of acidosis. A marked and statistically significant difference was observed in the changes of the acidity scores between untreated and treated mice after 3 days of treatment (Δacidity score = −0.14±0.23 and +0.15±0.34, P<0.05, Fig. 5B). After 15 days a marked difference in pHe distribution still remains between treated and untreated mice (Δacidity score = +0.003±0.24 and +0.18±0.35 for treated and untreated mice, respectively; P>0.05). Representative acidity score maps are shown in Fig. 6C and D for untreated and treated mice, respectively. Upon DCA-treatment, a decrease in the number of pixels clustered at more acidic pH values (colour coded in red) is well detected after three days of treatment. The MRI-based measurements of tumour extracellular pH showed that DCA was effective in inhibiting tumour glycolysis in vivo, resulting in a marked decreased acidification of the interstitial space, as observed for the in vitro studies.

Tumour lactate concentration of treated mice was significantly decreased compared with untreated ones (lactate levels in treated mice was ca. three times lower than in untreated mice, P=0.0077). No significant variation in tumour lactate levels was observed comparing treated to untreated mice after 15 days (Fig. 5C). A strong and significant inverse correlation was found between lactate levels and changes in tumour pHe (r= −0.97, P<0.05, Fig. 5D). These results suggest that DCA can inhibit the glycolytic activity of TS/A tumours, at least for early time points and that changes in lactate production and extracellular pH are highly correlated.

Discussion

High rate of glucose uptake and of lactate production are two distinctive features of metabolically altered tumour cells. DCA is able to revert the glycolytic phenotype through metabolic inhibition of PDK that allows pyruvate to enter into the tricarboxylic acid cycle thus limiting lactate production and in turn, decreasing H+ ions pumped out in the extracellular space. Herein, we investigated the effect of DCA on tumour pHe in a breast cancer murine model using a non-invasive MRI-based CEST pH imaging approach.

All the investigated breast cancer cell lines showed a marked reduction in their metabolic capacity and vitality, but their response to DCA was dependent on DCA concentration as well as on the cell line itself, hence indicating different sensitivity. Previous studies in other breast cancer cell lines showed that they were sensitive to DCA (32) but not all to the same extent, indicating a cell line dependency. Sensitivity to DCA may be dependent on several factors, including different expression and/or activity of PDK-PDH isoenzymes (37), or DCA internalization that is dependent on the ability to reach mitochondria matrix (38).

Moreover, evidence confirmed that the DCA effect on cell cycle is also cellular-dependent and studies conducted on glioblastoma, glioma, non-small cell lung cancer and colon rectal cancer cells revealed that DCA treatment at 20 mM concentration caused apoptosis and G2 phase cell cycle arrest (33,34). In TS/A cells, 10 mM DCA induced a small increase in G2/M phase although not statistically significant. Taken together these data indicate that DCA is not a cytotoxic drug but it acts as a metabolic agent.

DCA-induced glycolysis inhibition is expected to reduce lactate production, hence alter extracellular acidification, as already demonstrated in previous in vitro studies by measuring pHe changes (39,40). Within this study, we observed a marked increase of extracellular pH that was dependent on DCA concentration; moreover, the alkalinisation of pHe was even more pronounced when TS/A cells were cultured in hypoxic conditions (1% O2) than in normoxic conditions, simulating a poorly-perfused tumour microenvironment. Our in vivo MRI-based observations reflect similar findings, since we measured a significant increase in tumour pHe as early as three days after DCA-treatment.

Other studies in breast and prostate cell lines showed that lactate production is reduced upon DCA treatment (41-43). We observed that lactate production was reduced following DCA treatment both in vitro, just after 24 h, as well as in vivo, with a marked decrease in lactate levels after three days of treatment. Notably, these changes in lactate levels were highly correlated with changes in pHe in vitro and the same strong correlation was found in vivo, likely reflecting the intertwined dependence between glycolysis, lactate levels and tumour acidosis (Figs. 2C, 3C and 5D).

Although other in vivo studies confirmed the DCA antitumour activity on solid tumours (44), in this study treated mice showed a limited tumour growth reduction following 15 days of treatment and only a slight increase of the survival time was observed as compared to untreated mice. This may be explained considering that DCA alone has a moderate efficiency as chemotherapeutic drug, and its antineoplastic pharmacological effect can be augmented when used in combination with other drugs (41,45,46). Our results are in agreement with these observations, as similar lactate levels were observed in untreated and treated mice after 15 days of treatment. These results parallel those obtained by measuring in vivo tumour pHe, which at 15 days show a reduced difference between treated and untreated mice in terms of pHe changes and of acidity scores. These findings confirm the ability of the proposed non-invasive approach to assess the onset of resistance to DCA, since tumour acidosis returned to almost baseline values after 15 days. This behaviour was confirmed by similar changes in lactate levels. Moreover, the inefficacy of DCA to halt tumour glycolysis after 15 days, as measured by the proposed approach, anticipated the lack of difference in terms of survival times between treated and untreated groups.

In this study, in vivo pH changes were assessed by MRI-CEST imaging using iopamidol, an MRI-CEST pH-responsive agent able to map pHe and tumour perfusion in the microenvironment in which it is distributed (4749). Although iopamidol showed a heterogeneous distribution in the tumour region, the application of the ratiometric pH method allowed obtaining representative pH maps for the region of interest. To get more insight into the tumour pHe heterogeneity, we calculated the acidity score that reports on the distribution of pixels clustered on the basis of their relative acidity inside the tumour region. Representative acidity score maps showed an increase in blue pixels during DCA treatment for treated mice (Fig. 6D), reflecting the DCA-induced glycolysis inhibition, hence alkalinisation of tumour pHe, although we cannot exclude that there are other pathways that may contribute to tumour extracellular acidification (50). A similar decrease of tumour acidosis was observed in a xenograft model of B-cell lymphoma upon treatment with metaiodobenzylguanidine by using an analogous pH-responsive CEST agent (51). Of note, also endogenous CEST pH mapping allowed monitoring intracellular acidification following lonidamine or topiramate treatment in orthotopic glioblastoma tumours (52,53). All these results confirm the feasibility of MRI-CEST pH mapping to monitor the response to drugs targeting tumour metabolism.

In conclusion, despite the lack of tumour growth reduction, this study demonstrated that MRI-CEST pH imaging is able to detect the early response to DCA by measuring changes in tumour pHe. These findings correlated well with the observed reduced lactate levels as a consequence of the reversed glycolytic phenotype. These results suggest that MRI-CEST pH imaging may serve as a useful imaging biomarker for monitoring changes in metabolism following drugs targeting tumour deregulated glycolysis.

Acknowledgments

Financial support from European Community's Seventh Framework Programme (H2020 GLINT project 667510) is gratefully acknowledged. L.C. was supported by a fellowship from Fondazione Umberto Veronesi.

References

1 

Gerweck LE and Seetharaman K: Cellular pH gradient in tumor versus normal tissue: Potential exploitation for the treatment of cancer. Cancer Res. 56:1194–1198. 1996.PubMed/NCBI

2 

Warburg O, Wind F and Negelein E: The metabolism of tumors in the body. J Gen Physiol. 8:519–530. 1927. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

3 

Webb BA, Chimenti M, Jacobson MP and Barber DL: Dysregulated pH: A perfect storm for cancer progression. Nat Rev Cancer. 11:671–677. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

4 

Hashim AI, Zhang X, Wojtkowiak JW, Martinez GV and Gillies RJ: Imaging pH and metastasis. NMR Biomed. 24:582–591. 2011.PubMed/NCBI

5 

Michelakis ED, Webster L and Mackey JR: Dichloroacetate (DCA) as a potential metabolic-targeting therapy for cancer. Br J Cancer. 99:989–994. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

6 

McFate T, Mohyeldin A, Lu H, Thakar J, Henriques J, Halim ND, Wu H, Schell MJ, Tsang TM, Teahan O, et al: Pyruvate dehydrogenase complex activity controls metabolic and malignant phenotype in cancer cells. J Biol Chem. 283:22700–22708. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

7 

Bonnet S, Archer SL, Allalunis-Turner J, Haromy A, Beaulieu C, Thompson R, Lee CT, Lopaschuk GD, Puttagunta L, Bonnet S, et al: A mitochondria-K+ channel axis is suppressed in cancer and its normalization promotes apoptosis and inhibits cancer growth. Cancer Cell. 11:37–51. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

8 

De Preter G, Neveu MA, Danhier P, Brisson L, Payen VL, Porporato PE, Jordan BF, Sonveaux P and Gallez B: Inhibition of the pentose phosphate pathway by dichloroacetate unravels a missing link between aerobic glycolysis and cancer cell proliferation. Oncotarget. 7:2910–2920. 2016.

9 

Dunbar EM, Coats BS, Shroads AL, Langaee T, Lew A, Forder JR, Shuster JJ, Wagner DA and Stacpoole PW: Phase 1 trial of dichloroacetate (DCA) in adults with recurrent malignant brain tumors. Invest New Drugs. 32:452–464. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar

10 

Zhang X, Lin Y and Gillies RJ: Tumor pH and its measurement. J Nucl Med. 51:1167–1170. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

11 

Gillies RJ, Liu Z and Bhujwalla Z: 31P-MRS measurements of extracellular pH of tumors using 3-aminopropylphosphonate. Am J Physiol. 267:C195–C203. 1994.PubMed/NCBI

12 

Garcia-Martin ML, Martinez GV, Raghunand N, Sherry AD, Zhang S and Gillies RJ: High resolution pH(e) imaging of rat glioma using pH-dependent relaxivity. Magn Reson Med. 55:309–315. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

13 

Gallagher FA, Kettunen MI, Day SE, Hu DE, Ardenkjaer- Larsen JH, Zandt R, Jensen PR, Karlsson M, Golman K, Lerche MH, et al: Magnetic resonance imaging of pH in vivo using hyperpolarized 13C-labelled bicarbonate. Nature. 453:940–943. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

14 

Serrao EM and Brindle KM: Potential clinical roles for metabolic imaging with hyperpolarized [1-13C]pyruvate. Front Oncol. 6:592016. View Article : Google Scholar

15 

Reineri F, Daniele V, Cavallari E and Aime S: Assessing the transport rate of hyperpolarized pyruvate and lactate from the intra- to the extracellular space. NMR Biomed. 29:1022–1027. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

16 

Reineri F, Boi T and Aime S: Parahydrogen induced polarization of 13C carboxylate resonance in acetate and pyruvate. Nat Commun. 6:58582015. View Article : Google Scholar

17 

Viale A, Reineri F, Dastrù W and Aime S: Hyperpolarized (13) C-pyruvate magnetic resonance imaging in cancer diagnostics. Expert Opin Med Diagn. 6:335–345. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar

18 

Menzel MI, Farrell EV, Janich MA, Khegai O, Wiesinger F, Nekolla S, Otto AM, Haase A, Schulte RF and Schwaiger M: Multimodal assessment of in vivo metabolism with hyperpolarized [1-13C]MR spectroscopy and 18F-FDG PET imaging in hepatocellular carcinoma tumor-bearing rats. J Nucl Med. 54:1113–1119. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

19 

Rivlin M and Navon G: Glucosamine and N-acetyl glucosamine as new CEST MRI agents for molecular imaging of tumors. Sci Rep. 6:326482016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

20 

Xu X, Chan KW, Knutsson L, Artemov D, Xu J, Liu G, Kato Y, Lal B, Laterra J, McMahon MT, et al: Dynamic glucose enhanced (DGE) MRI for combined imaging of blood-brain barrier break down and increased blood volume in brain cancer. Magn Reson Med. 74:1556–1563. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

21 

Rivlin M, Tsarfaty I and Navon G: Functional molecular imaging of tumors by chemical exchange saturation transfer MRI of 3-O-Methyl-D-glucose. Magn Reson Med. 72:1375–1380. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

22 

Walker-Samuel S, Ramasawmy R, Torrealdea F, Rega M, Rajkumar V, Johnson SP, Richardson S, Gonçalves M, Parkes HG, Arstad E, et al: In vivo imaging of glucose uptake and metabolism in tumors. Nat Med. 19:1067–1072. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

23 

Hingorani DV, Bernstein AS and Pagel MD: A review of responsive MRI contrast agents: 2005–2014. Contrast Media Mol Imaging. 10:245–265. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar

24 

Longo DL, Dastrù W, Digilio G, Keupp J, Langereis S, Lanzardo S, Prestigio S, Steinbach O, Terreno E, Uggeri F, et al: Iopamidol as a responsive MRI-chemical exchange saturation transfer contrast agent for pH mapping of kidneys. In vivo studies in mice at 7. T Magn Reson Med. 65:202–211. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar

25 

Longo DL, Busato A, Lanzardo S, Antico F and Aime S: Imaging the pH evolution of an acute kidney injury model by means of iopamidol, a MRI-CEST pH-responsive contrast agent. Magn Reson Med. 70:859–864. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar

26 

Chen LQ, Howison CM, Jeffery JJ, Robey IF, Kuo PH and Pagel MD: Evaluations of extracellular pH within in vivo tumors using acidoCEST MRI. Magn Reson Med. 72:1408–1417. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar :

27 

Moon BF, Jones KM, Chen LQ, Liu P, Randtke EA, Howison CM and Pagel MD: A comparison of iopromide and iopamidol, two acidoCEST MRI contrast media that measure tumor extracellular pH. Contrast Media Mol Imaging. 10:446–455. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

28 

Yang X, Song X, Ray Banerjee S, Li Y, Byun Y, Liu G, Bhujwalla ZM, Pomper MG and McMahon MT: Developing imidazoles as CEST MRI pH sensors. Contrast Media Mol Imaging. 11:304–312. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

29 

Longo DL, Bartoli A, Consolino L, Bardini P, Arena F, Schwaiger M and Aime S: In vivo imaging of tumor metabolism and acidosis by combining PET and MRI-CEST pH imaging. Cancer Res. 76:6463–6470. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

30 

Nanni P, de Giovanni C, Lollini PL, Nicoletti G and Prodi G: TS/A: A new metastasizing cell line from a BALB/c spontaneous mammary adenocarcinoma. Clin Exp Metastasis. 1:373–380. 1983. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

31 

Lanzardo S, Conti L, Rooke R, Ruiu R, Accart N, Bolli E, Arigoni M, Macagno M, Barrera G, Pizzimenti S, et al: Immunotargeting of antigen xCT attenuates stem-like cell behavior and metastatic progression in breast cancer. Cancer Res. 76:62–72. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar

32 

Sun RC, Fadia M, Dahlstrom JE, Parish CR, Board PG and Blackburn AC: Reversal of the glycolytic phenotype by dichloroacetate inhibits metastatic breast cancer cell growth in vitro and in vivo. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 120:253–260. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar

33 

Duan Y, Zhao X, Ren W, Wang X, Yu KF, Li D, Zhang X and Zhang Q: In vitro and in vivo evaluation. Onco Targets Ther. 6:189–198. 2013.

34 

Takahashi M, Watari E and Takahashi H: Dichloroacetate induces cell cycle arrest in human glioblastoma cells persistently infected with measles virus: A way for controlling viral persistent infection. Antiviral Res. 113:107–110. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar

35 

Allen KT, Chin-Sinex H, DeLuca T, Pomerening JR, Sherer J, Watkins JB III, Foley J, Jesseph JM and Mendonca MS: Dichloroacetate alters Warburg metabolism, inhibits cell growth, and increases the X-ray sensitivity of human A549 and H1299 NSC lung cancer cells. Free Radic Biol Med. 89:263–273. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

36 

Madhok BM, Yeluri S, Perry SL, Hughes TA and Jayne DG: Dichloroacetate induces apoptosis and cell-cycle arrest in colorectal cancer cells. Br J Cancer. 102:1746–1752. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

37 

Bowker-Kinley MM, Davis WI, Wu P, Harris RA and Popov KM: Evidence for existence of tissue-specific regulation of the mammalian pyruvate dehydrogenase complex. Biochem J. 329:191–196. 1998. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

38 

Babu E, Ramachandran S, CoothanKandaswamy V, Elangovan S, Prasad PD, Ganapathy V and Thangaraju M: Role of SLC5A8, a plasma membrane transporter and a tumor suppressor, in the antitumor activity of dichloroacetate. Oncogene. 30:4026–4037. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

39 

Haugrud AB, Zhuang Y, Coppock JD and Miskimins WK: Dichloroacetate enhances apoptotic cell death via oxidative damage and attenuates lactate production in metformin-treated breast cancer cells. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 147:539–550. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

40 

Kumar A, Kant S and Singh SM: Novel molecular mechanisms of antitumor action of dichloroacetate against T cell lymphoma: Implication of altered glucose metabolism, pH homeostasis and cell survival regulation. Chem Biol Interact. 199:29–37. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

41 

Robey IF and Martin NK: Bicarbonate and dichloroacetate: Evaluating pH altering therapies in a mouse model for metastatic breast cancer. BMC Cancer. 11:2352011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

42 

Xintaropoulou C, Ward C, Wise A, Marston H, Turnbull A and Langdon SP: A comparative analysis of inhibitors of the glycolysis pathway in breast and ovarian cancer cell line models. Oncotarget. 6:25677–25695. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

43 

Kailavasan M, Rehman I, Reynolds S, Bucur A, Tozer G and Paley M: NMR-based evaluation of the metabolic profile and response to dichloroacetate of human prostate cancer cells. NMR Biomed. 27:610–616. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

44 

Kinnaird A, Dromparis P, Saleme B, Gurtu V, Watson K, Paulin R, Zervopoulos S, Stenson T, Sutendra G, Pink DB, et al: Metabolic modulation of clear-cell renal cell carcinoma with dichloroacetate, an inhibitor of pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase. Eur Urol. 69:734–744. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar

45 

Sanchez WY, McGee SL, Connor T, Mottram B, Wilkinson A, Whitehead JP, Vuckovic S and Catley L: Dichloroacetate inhibits aerobic glycolysis in multiple myeloma cells and increases sensitivity to bortezomib. Br J Cancer. 108:1624–1633. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

46 

Xie J, Wang BS, Yu DH, Lu Q, Ma J, Qi H, Fang C and Chen HZ: Dichloroacetate shifts the metabolism from glycolysis to glucose oxidation and exhibits synergistic growth inhibition with cisplatin in HeLa cells. Int J Oncol. 38:409–417. 2011.

47 

Longo DL, Sun PZ, Consolino L, Michelotti FC, Uggeri F and Aime S: A general MRI-CEST ratiometric approach for pH imaging: Demonstration of in vivo pH mapping with iobitridol. J Am Chem Soc. 136:14333–14336. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

48 

Longo DL, Michelotti F, Consolino L, Bardini P, Digilio G, Xiao G, Sun PZ and Aime S: In vitro and in vivo assessment of nonionic iodinated radiographic molecules as chemical exchange saturation transfer magnetic resonance imaging tumor perfusion agents. Invest Radiol. 51:155–162. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar

49 

Anemone A, Consolino L and Longo DL: MRI-CEST assessment of tumour perfusion using X-ray iodinated agents: Comparison with a conventional Gd-based agent. Eur Radiol. 27:2170–2179. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar

50 

Kato Y, Ozawa S, Miyamoto C, Maehata Y, Suzuki A, Maeda T and Baba Y: Acidic extracellular microenvironment and cancer. Cancer Cell Int. 13:892013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

51 

Chen LQ, Howison CM, Spier C, Stopeck AT, Malm SW, Pagel MD and Baker AF: Assessment of carbonic anhydrase IX expression and extracellular pH in B-cell lymphoma cell line models. Leuk Lymphoma. 56:1432–1439. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar

52 

Mcvicar N, Li AX, Meakin SO and Bartha R: Imaging chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) effects following tumor-selective acidification using lonidamine. NMR Biomed. 28:566–575. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

53 

Marathe K, Mcvicar N, Li A, Bellyou M, Meakin S and Bartha R: Topiramate induces acute intracellular acidification in glioblastoma. J Neurooncol. 130:465–472. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Related Articles

Journal Cover

August 2017
Volume 51 Issue 2

Print ISSN: 1019-6439
Online ISSN:1791-2423

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
APA
Anemone, A., Consolino, L., Conti, L., Reineri, F., Cavallo, F., Aime, S., & Longo, D.L. (2017). In vivo evaluation of tumour acidosis for assessing the early metabolic response and onset of resistance to dichloroacetate by using magnetic resonance pH imaging. International Journal of Oncology, 51, 498-506. https://doi.org/10.3892/ijo.2017.4029
MLA
Anemone, A., Consolino, L., Conti, L., Reineri, F., Cavallo, F., Aime, S., Longo, D. L."In vivo evaluation of tumour acidosis for assessing the early metabolic response and onset of resistance to dichloroacetate by using magnetic resonance pH imaging". International Journal of Oncology 51.2 (2017): 498-506.
Chicago
Anemone, A., Consolino, L., Conti, L., Reineri, F., Cavallo, F., Aime, S., Longo, D. L."In vivo evaluation of tumour acidosis for assessing the early metabolic response and onset of resistance to dichloroacetate by using magnetic resonance pH imaging". International Journal of Oncology 51, no. 2 (2017): 498-506. https://doi.org/10.3892/ijo.2017.4029