Spandidos Publications Logo
  • About
    • About Spandidos
    • Aims and Scopes
    • Abstracting and Indexing
    • Editorial Policies
    • Reprints and Permissions
    • Job Opportunities
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Contact
  • Journals
    • All Journals
    • Oncology Letters
      • Oncology Letters
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • International Journal of Oncology
      • International Journal of Oncology
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Molecular and Clinical Oncology
      • Molecular and Clinical Oncology
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine
      • Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • International Journal of Molecular Medicine
      • International Journal of Molecular Medicine
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Biomedical Reports
      • Biomedical Reports
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Oncology Reports
      • Oncology Reports
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Molecular Medicine Reports
      • Molecular Medicine Reports
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • World Academy of Sciences Journal
      • World Academy of Sciences Journal
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • International Journal of Functional Nutrition
      • International Journal of Functional Nutrition
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • International Journal of Epigenetics
      • International Journal of Epigenetics
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Medicine International
      • Medicine International
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
  • Articles
  • Information
    • Information for Authors
    • Information for Reviewers
    • Information for Librarians
    • Information for Advertisers
    • Conferences
  • Language Editing
Spandidos Publications Logo
  • About
    • About Spandidos
    • Aims and Scopes
    • Abstracting and Indexing
    • Editorial Policies
    • Reprints and Permissions
    • Job Opportunities
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Contact
  • Journals
    • All Journals
    • Biomedical Reports
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • International Journal of Epigenetics
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • International Journal of Functional Nutrition
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • International Journal of Molecular Medicine
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • International Journal of Oncology
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Medicine International
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Molecular and Clinical Oncology
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Molecular Medicine Reports
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Oncology Letters
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Oncology Reports
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • World Academy of Sciences Journal
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
  • Articles
  • Information
    • For Authors
    • For Reviewers
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Conferences
  • Language Editing
Login Register Submit
  • This site uses cookies
  • You can change your cookie settings at any time by following the instructions in our Cookie Policy. To find out more, you may read our Privacy Policy.

    I agree
Search articles by DOI, keyword, author or affiliation
Search
Advanced Search
presentation
International Journal of Oncology
Join Editorial Board Propose a Special Issue
Print ISSN: 1019-6439 Online ISSN: 1791-2423
Journal Cover
September-2019 Volume 55 Issue 3

Full Size Image

Cover Legend PDF

Sign up for eToc alerts
Recommend to Library

Journals

International Journal of Molecular Medicine

International Journal of Molecular Medicine

International Journal of Molecular Medicine is an international journal devoted to molecular mechanisms of human disease.

International Journal of Oncology

International Journal of Oncology

International Journal of Oncology is an international journal devoted to oncology research and cancer treatment.

Molecular Medicine Reports

Molecular Medicine Reports

Covers molecular medicine topics such as pharmacology, pathology, genetics, neuroscience, infectious diseases, molecular cardiology, and molecular surgery.

Oncology Reports

Oncology Reports

Oncology Reports is an international journal devoted to fundamental and applied research in Oncology.

Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine

Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine

Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine is an international journal devoted to laboratory and clinical medicine.

Oncology Letters

Oncology Letters

Oncology Letters is an international journal devoted to Experimental and Clinical Oncology.

Biomedical Reports

Biomedical Reports

Explores a wide range of biological and medical fields, including pharmacology, genetics, microbiology, neuroscience, and molecular cardiology.

Molecular and Clinical Oncology

Molecular and Clinical Oncology

International journal addressing all aspects of oncology research, from tumorigenesis and oncogenes to chemotherapy and metastasis.

World Academy of Sciences Journal

World Academy of Sciences Journal

Multidisciplinary open-access journal spanning biochemistry, genetics, neuroscience, environmental health, and synthetic biology.

International Journal of Functional Nutrition

International Journal of Functional Nutrition

Open-access journal combining biochemistry, pharmacology, immunology, and genetics to advance health through functional nutrition.

International Journal of Epigenetics

International Journal of Epigenetics

Publishes open-access research on using epigenetics to advance understanding and treatment of human disease.

Medicine International

Medicine International

An International Open Access Journal Devoted to General Medicine.

Journal Cover
September-2019 Volume 55 Issue 3

Full Size Image

Cover Legend PDF

Sign up for eToc alerts
Recommend to Library

  • Article
  • Citations
    • Cite This Article
    • Download Citation
    • Create Citation Alert
    • Remove Citation Alert
    • Cited By
  • Similar Articles
    • Related Articles (in Spandidos Publications)
    • Similar Articles (Google Scholar)
    • Similar Articles (PubMed)
  • Download PDF
  • Download XML
  • View XML

  • Supplementary Files
    • Supplementary_Data.pdf
Article

Surgical outcomes and learning curve analysis of robotic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: Multidimensional analysis compared with three‑dimensional high‑definition laparoscopic gastrectomy

  • Authors:
    • Jiyang Li
    • Hongqing Xi
    • Xin Guo
    • Yunhe Gao
    • Tianyu Xie
    • Zhi Qiao
    • Lin Chen
  • View Affiliations / Copyright

    Affiliations: Department of General Surgery, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, P.R. China
  • Pages: 733-744
    |
    Published online on: July 30, 2019
       https://doi.org/10.3892/ijo.2019.4851
  • Expand metrics +
Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Metrics: Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Cited By (CrossRef): 0 citations Loading Articles...

This article is mentioned in:



Abstract

The present ambispective cohort study was performed to compare the short‑term surgical outcomes, including financial cost and surgeons' acceptance, of robotic versus three‑dimensional high‑definition (3D‑HD) laparoscopic gastrectomy for patients with gastric cancer (GC). Between 2011 and 2017, 517 patients with GC were enrolled for treatment with either robotic gastrectomy [408 patients, including 73 treated by one of the authors (LC)] or 3D‑HD laparoscopic gastrectomy (109 patients, including 71 treated by LC). The cumulative summation method was developed to analyze the learning curves of robotic and 3D‑HD laparoscopic gastrectomy performed by LC. In the analysis of all 517 patients, there were no significant differences in the clinicopathological characteristics between the two treatment groups, with the exception of smoking status (P<0.001). The robotic group had a shorter operative time (OT; 209 vs. 228 min, P=0.004), fewer postoperative days (PODs) to first flatus (3 vs. 4 days, P=0.025), more PODs to removal of the drainage and nasogastric tubes (12 vs. 9 days, P=0.001; 6 vs. 4 days, P=0.001, respectively), and more postoperative complications (21.3 vs. 9.2%, P=0.003). Comparison of these short‑term outcomes of robotic and 3D‑HD laparoscopic gastrectomy performed by LC (144 patients) revealed that only the number of retrieved lymph nodes (27 in the robotic group vs. 33 in the 3D‑HD group; P=0.038) and PODs to removal of the nasogastric tube (5 days in the robotic group vs. 3 days in the 3D‑HD group; P<0.001) were significantly different. The OT stabilized after around 21 robotic gastrectomy procedures and 19 3D‑HD laparoscopic gastrectomy procedures. The cost‑effectiveness analysis revealed that robotic gastrectomy had a significantly higher total cost than 3D‑HD laparoscopic gastrectomy (124,907 vs. 94,395 RMB, P<0.001). With comparable surgical outcomes, lower financial cost and higher surgeons' acceptance, 3D‑HD laparoscopic gastrectomy is highly recommended as a minimally invasive surgical method for patients with GC prior to the popularization of robotic surgery.
View Figures

Figure 1

Figure 2

Figure 3

Figure 4

View References

1 

Choi YY, Noh SH and Cheong JH: Evolution of gastric cancer treatment: From the golden age of surgery to an era of precision medicine. Yonsei Med J. 56:1177–1185. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

2 

Kim HH, Hyung WJ, Cho GS, Kim MC, Han SU, Kim W, Ryu SW, Lee HJ and Song KY: Morbidity and mortality of laparoscopic gastrectomy versus open gastrectomy for gastric cancer: An interim report - a phase III multicenter, prospective, randomized Trial (KLASS Trial). Ann Surg. 251:417–420. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

3 

Lu J, Zheng CH, Zheng HL, Li P, Xie JW, Wang JB, Lin JX, Chen QY, Cao LL, Lin M, et al: Randomized, controlled trial comparing clinical outcomes of 3D and 2D laparoscopic surgery for gastric cancer: An interim report. Surg Endosc. 31:2939–2945. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar

4 

Corcione F, Esposito C, Cuccurullo D, Settembre A, Miranda N, Amato F, Pirozzi F and Caiazzo P: Advantages and limits of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery: Preliminary experience. Surg Endosc. 19:117–119. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar

5 

Hur H, Kim JY, Cho YK and Han SU: Technical feasibility of robot-sewn anastomosis in robotic surgery for gastric cancer. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 20:693–697. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

6 

Suda K, Man-I M, Ishida Y, Kawamura Y, Satoh S and Uyama I: Potential advantages of robotic radical gastrectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma in comparison with conventional laparoscopic approach: A single institutional retrospective comparative cohort study. Surg Endosc. 29:673–685. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar

7 

Uyama I, Kanaya S, Ishida Y, Inaba K, Suda K and Satoh S: Novel integrated robotic approach for suprapancreatic D2 nodal dissection for treating gastric cancer: Technique and initial experience. World J Surg. 36:331–337. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar

8 

Sørensen SM, Savran MM, Konge L and Bjerrum F: Three-dimensional versus two-dimensional vision in laparoscopy: A systematic review. Surg Endosc. 30:11–23. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar

9 

Kim YM, Son T, Kim HI, Noh SH and Hyung WJ: Robotic D2 lymph node dissection during distal subtotal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: Toward procedural standardization. Ann Surg Oncol. 23:2409–2410. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

10 

Song J, Oh SJ, Kang WH, Hyung WJ, Choi SH and Noh SH: Robot-assisted gastrectomy with lymph node dissection for gastric cancer: Lessons learned from an initial 100 consecutive procedures. Ann Surg. 249:927–932. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

11 

Son T, Lee JH, Kim YM, Kim HI, Noh SH and Hyung WJ: Robotic spleen-preserving total gastrectomy for gastric cancer: Comparison with conventional laparoscopic procedure. Surg Endosc. 28:2606–2615. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

12 

Lianos GD, Rausei S, Dionigi G and Boni L: Assessing safety and feasibility of minimally invasive surgical approaches for advanced gastric cancer. Future Oncol. 12:5–8. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar

13 

Junfeng Z, Yan S, Bo T, Yingxue H, Dongzhu Z, Yongliang Z, Feng Q and Peiwu Y: Robotic gastrectomy versus laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: Comparison of surgical performance and short-term outcomes. Surg Endosc. 28:1779–1787. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

14 

Shen W, Xi H, Wei B, Cui J, Bian S, Zhang K, Wang N, Huang X and Chen L: Robotic versus laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: Comparison of short-term surgical outcomes. Surg Endosc. 30:574–580. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar

15 

Nakauchi M, Suda K, Susumu S, Kadoya S, Inaba K, Ishida Y and Uyama I: Comparison of the long-term outcomes of robotic radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer and conventional lapa-roscopic approach: A single institutional retrospective cohort study. Surg Endosc. 30:5444–5452. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

16 

Obama K, Kim YM, Kang DR, Son T, Kim HI, Noh SH and Hyung WJ: Long-term oncologic outcomes of robotic gastrectomy for gastric cancer compared with laparoscopic gastrectomy. Gastric Cancer. 21:285–295. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar

17 

Coratti A, Fernandes E, Lombardi A, Di Marino M, Annecchiarico M, Felicioni L and Giulianotti PC: Robot-assisted surgery for gastric carcinoma: Five years follow-up and beyond: A single western center experience and long-term oncological outcomes. Eur J Surg Oncol. 41:1106–1113. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

18 

Rozner MA: The American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status score and risk of perioperative infection. JAMA. 275:15441996. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

19 

Borrmann R: Geschwulste des Magens und des Duodenums. Handbuch Spez Pathol Anat und Histo. Henke F and Lubarsch O: Springer Verlag; Berlin: pp. 812–1054. 1926

20 

Ajani JA, D'Amico TA, Almhanna K, Bentrem DJ, Chao J, Das P, Denlinger CS, Fanta P, Farjah F, Fuchs CS, et al: Gastric cancer, version 3.2016, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 14:1286–1312. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

21 

Dindo D, Demartines N and Clavien PA: Classification of surgical complications: A new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 240:205–213. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

22 

Yang SY, Roh KH, Kim YN, Cho M, Lim SH, Son T, Hyung WJ and Kim HI: Surgical Outcomes After Open, Laparoscopic, and Robotic Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 24:1770–1777. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

23 

Maguire T, Mayne CJ, Terry T and Tincello DG: Analysis of the surgical learning curve using the cumulative sum (CUSUM) method. Neurourol Urodyn. 32:964–967. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

24 

Zhou J, Shi Y, Qian F, Tang B, Hao Y, Zhao Y and Yu P: Cumulative summation analysis of learning curve for robot-assisted gastrectomy in gastric cancer. J Surg Oncol. 111:760–767. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

25 

Biswas P and Kalbfleisch JD: A risk-adjusted CUSUM in continuous time based on the Cox model. Stat Med. 27:3382–3406. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

26 

Pendlimari R, Holubar SD, Dozois EJ, Larson DW, Pemberton JH and Cima RR: Technical proficiency in hand-assisted laparoscopic colon and rectal surgery: Determining how many cases are required to achieve mastery. Arch Surg. 147:317–322. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar

27 

Biau DJ, Resche-Rigon M, Godiris-Petit G, Nizard RS and Porcher R: Quality control of surgical and interventional procedures: A review of the CUSUM. Qual Saf Health Care. 16:203–207. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

28 

Son T, Hyung WJ, Lee JH, Kim YM, Kim HI, An JY, Cheong JH and Noh SH: Clinical implication of an insufficient number of examined lymph nodes after curative resection for gastric cancer. Cancer. 118:4687–4693. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

29 

Hyun MH, Lee CH, Kwon YJ, Cho SI, Jang YJ, Kim DH, Kim JH, Park SH, Mok YJ and Park SS: Robot versus lapa-roscopic gastrectomy for cancer by an experienced surgeon: Comparisons of surgery, complications, and surgical stress. Ann Surg Oncol. 20:1258–1265. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar

30 

Kim HI, Han SU, Yang HK, Kim YW, Lee HJ, Ryu KW, Park JM, An JY, Kim MC, Park S, et al: Multicenter Prospective Comparative Study of Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Gastrectomy for Gastric Adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg. 263:103–109. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar

31 

Lanfranco AR, Castellanos AE, Desai JP and Meyers WC: Robotic surgery: A current perspective. Ann Surg. 239:14–21. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar

32 

Kim HI, Park MS, Song KJ, Woo Y and Hyung WJ: Rapid and safe learning of robotic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: Multidimensional analysis in a comparison with laparoscopic gastrectomy. Eur J Surg Oncol. 40:1346–1354. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar

33 

Jeong O, Ryu SY, Choi WY, Piao Z and Park YK: Risk factors and learning curve associated with postoperative morbidity of laparoscopic total gastrectomy for gastric carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 21:2994–3001. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Related Articles

  • Abstract
  • View
  • Download
  • Twitter
Copy and paste a formatted citation
Spandidos Publications style
Li J, Xi H, Guo X, Gao Y, Xie T, Qiao Z and Chen L: Surgical outcomes and learning curve analysis of robotic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: Multidimensional analysis compared with three‑dimensional high‑definition laparoscopic gastrectomy. Int J Oncol 55: 733-744, 2019.
APA
Li, J., Xi, H., Guo, X., Gao, Y., Xie, T., Qiao, Z., & Chen, L. (2019). Surgical outcomes and learning curve analysis of robotic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: Multidimensional analysis compared with three‑dimensional high‑definition laparoscopic gastrectomy. International Journal of Oncology, 55, 733-744. https://doi.org/10.3892/ijo.2019.4851
MLA
Li, J., Xi, H., Guo, X., Gao, Y., Xie, T., Qiao, Z., Chen, L."Surgical outcomes and learning curve analysis of robotic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: Multidimensional analysis compared with three‑dimensional high‑definition laparoscopic gastrectomy". International Journal of Oncology 55.3 (2019): 733-744.
Chicago
Li, J., Xi, H., Guo, X., Gao, Y., Xie, T., Qiao, Z., Chen, L."Surgical outcomes and learning curve analysis of robotic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: Multidimensional analysis compared with three‑dimensional high‑definition laparoscopic gastrectomy". International Journal of Oncology 55, no. 3 (2019): 733-744. https://doi.org/10.3892/ijo.2019.4851
Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Li J, Xi H, Guo X, Gao Y, Xie T, Qiao Z and Chen L: Surgical outcomes and learning curve analysis of robotic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: Multidimensional analysis compared with three‑dimensional high‑definition laparoscopic gastrectomy. Int J Oncol 55: 733-744, 2019.
APA
Li, J., Xi, H., Guo, X., Gao, Y., Xie, T., Qiao, Z., & Chen, L. (2019). Surgical outcomes and learning curve analysis of robotic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: Multidimensional analysis compared with three‑dimensional high‑definition laparoscopic gastrectomy. International Journal of Oncology, 55, 733-744. https://doi.org/10.3892/ijo.2019.4851
MLA
Li, J., Xi, H., Guo, X., Gao, Y., Xie, T., Qiao, Z., Chen, L."Surgical outcomes and learning curve analysis of robotic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: Multidimensional analysis compared with three‑dimensional high‑definition laparoscopic gastrectomy". International Journal of Oncology 55.3 (2019): 733-744.
Chicago
Li, J., Xi, H., Guo, X., Gao, Y., Xie, T., Qiao, Z., Chen, L."Surgical outcomes and learning curve analysis of robotic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: Multidimensional analysis compared with three‑dimensional high‑definition laparoscopic gastrectomy". International Journal of Oncology 55, no. 3 (2019): 733-744. https://doi.org/10.3892/ijo.2019.4851
Follow us
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
About
  • Spandidos Publications
  • Careers
  • Cookie Policy
  • Privacy Policy
How can we help?
  • Help
  • Live Chat
  • Contact
  • Email to our Support Team