|
1
|
Place AE, Jin Huh S and Polyak K: The
microenvironment in breast cancer progression: Biology and
implications for treatment. Breast Cancer Res. 13:2272011.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
2
|
Almendro V, Marusyk A and Polyak K:
Cellular heterogeneity and molecular evolution in cancer. Annu Rev
Pathol. 8:277–302. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
3
|
Friedl P, Locker J, Sahai E and Segall JE:
Classifying collective cancer cell invasion. Nat Cell Biol.
14:777–783. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
4
|
Haeger A, Wolf K, Zegers MM and Friedl P:
Collective cell migration: Guidance principles and hierarchies.
Trends Cell Biol. 25:556–566. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
5
|
Westcott JM, Prechtl AM, Maine EA, Dang
TT, Esparza MA, Sun H, Zhou Y, Xie Y and Pearson GW: An
epigenetically distinct breast cancer cell subpopulation promotes
collective invasion. J Clin Invest. 125:1927–1943. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
6
|
Pandya P, Orgaz JL and Sanz-Moreno V:
Actomyosin contractility and collective migration: May the force be
with you. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 48:87–96. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
7
|
Poujade M Grasland-Mongrain E, Hertzog A,
Jouanneau J, Chavrier P, Ladoux B, Buguin A and Silberzan P:
Collective migration of an epithelial monolayer in response to a
model wound. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 104:15988–15993. 2007.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
8
|
Park J and Chronopolous A: Abstract B029:
Flip-flopping of fusion-positive rhabdomyosarcoma regulating
intratumoral heterogeneity for metastasis. Clin Cancer Res. 28(18
Suppl): B0292022. View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
9
|
Yamamoto E, Kohama G, Sunakawa H, Iwai M
and Hiratsuka H: Mode of invasion, bleomycin sensitivity, and
clinical course in squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity.
Cancer. 51:2175–2180. 1983. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
10
|
Gaggioli C, Hooper S, Hidalgo-Carcedo C,
Grosse R, Marshall JF, Harrington K and Sahai E: Fibroblast-led
collective invasion of carcinoma cells with differing roles for
RhoGTPases in leading and following cells. Nat Cell Biol.
9:1392–1400. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
11
|
Konen J, Summerbell E, Dwivedi B, Galior
K, Hou Y, Rusnak L, Chen A, Saltz J, Zhou W, Boise LH, et al:
Image-guided genomics of phenotypically heterogeneous populations
reveals vascular signalling during symbiotic collective cancer
invasion. Nat Commun. 8:150782017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
12
|
Zoeller EL, Pedro B, Konen J, Dwivedi B,
Rupji M, Sundararaman N, Wang L, Horton JR, Zhong C, Barwick BG, et
al: Genetic heterogeneity within collective invasion packs drives
leader and follower cell phenotypes. J Cell Sci. 132:jcs2315142019.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
13
|
Riahi R, Sun J, Wang S, Long M, Zhang DD
and Wong PK: Notch1-Dll4 signalling and mechanical force regulate
leader cell formation during collective cell migration. Nat Commun.
6:65562015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
14
|
Tse JM, Cheng G, Tyrrell JA,
Wilcox-Adelman SA, Boucher Y, Jain RK and Munn LL: Mechanical
compression drives cancer cells toward invasive phenotype. Proc
Natl Acad Sci USA. 109:911–916. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar :
|
|
15
|
Farooqui R and Fenteany G: Multiple rows
of cells behind an epithelial wound edge extend cryptic
lamellipodia to collectively drive cell-sheet movement. J Cell Sci.
118:51–63. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
16
|
Reffay M, Parrini MC, Cochet-Escartin O,
Ladoux B, Buguin A, Coscoy S, Amblard F, Camonis J and Silberzan P:
Interplay of RhoA and mechanical forces in collective cell
migration driven by leader cells. Nat Cell Biol. 16:217–223. 2014.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
17
|
Yamaguchi N, Mizutani T, Kawabata K and
Haga H: Leader cells regulate collective cell migration via Rac
activation in the downstream signaling of integrin β1 and PI3K. Sci
Rep. 5:76562015. View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
18
|
Mayor R and Etienne-Manneville S: The
front and rear of collective cell migration. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol.
17:97–109. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
19
|
Zhang J, Goliwas KF, Wang W, Taufalele PV,
Bordeleau F and Reinhart-King CA: Energetic regulation of
coordinated leader-follower dynamics during collective invasion of
breast cancer cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 116:7867–7872. 2019.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
20
|
Wolf K, Wu YI, Liu Y, Geiger J, Tam E,
Overall C, Stack MS and Friedl P: Multi-step pericellular
proteolysis controls the transition from individual to collective
cancer cell invasion. Nat Cell Biol. 9:893–904. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
21
|
Jolly MK, Somarelli JA, Sheth M, Biddle A,
Tripathi SC, Armstrong AJ, Hanash SM, Bapat SA, Rangarajan A and
Levine H: Hybrid epithelial/mesenchymal phenotypes promote
metastasis and therapy resistance across carcinomas. Pharmacol
Ther. 194:161–184. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
22
|
Mayor R and Carmona-Fontaine C: Keeping in
touch with contact inhibition of locomotion. Trends Cell Biol.
20:319–328. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
23
|
Stramer B and Mayor R: Mechanisms and in
vivo functions of contact inhibition of locomotion. Nat Rev Mol
Cell Biol. 18:43–55. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
24
|
Wendt MK, Taylor MA, Schiemann BJ and
Schiemann WP: Down-regulation of epithelial cadherin is required to
initiate metastatic outgrowth of breast cancer. Mol Biol Cell.
22:2423–2435. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
25
|
Abercrombie M: Contact inhibition and
malignancy. Nature. 281:259–262. 1979. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
26
|
Rørth P: Fellow travellers: Emergent
properties of collective cell migration. EMBO Rep. 13:984–991.
2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
27
|
Khalil AA and de Rooij J: Cadherin
mechanotransduction in leader-follower cell specification during
collective migration. Exp Cell Res. 376:86–91. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
28
|
Rorth P: Collective cell migration. Annu
Rev Cell Dev Biol. 25:407–429. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
29
|
Qin L, Yang D, Yi W, Cao H and Xiao G:
Roles of leader and follower cells in collective cell migration.
Mol Biol Cell. 32:1267–1272. 2021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
30
|
Camand E, Peglion F, Osmani N, Sanson M
and Etienne-Manneville S: N-cadherin expression level modulates
integrin-mediated polarity and strongly impacts on the speed and
directionality of glial cell migration. J Cell Sci. 125:844–857.
2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
31
|
Ladoux B, Mège RM and Trepat X: Front-rear
polarization by mechanical cues: From single cells to tissues.
Trends Cell Biol. 26:420–433. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
32
|
Abbruzzese G, Becker SF, Kashef J and
Alfandari D: ADAM13 cleavage of cadherin-11 promotes CNC migration
independently of the homophilic binding site. Dev Biol.
415:383–390. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar :
|
|
33
|
Quan Q, Wang X, Lu C, Ma W, Wang Y, Xia G,
Wang C and Yang G: Cancer stem-like cells with hybrid
epithelial/mesenchymal phenotype leading the collective invasion.
Cancer Sci. 111:467–476. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar :
|
|
34
|
Ye X and Weinberg RA:
Epithelial-mesenchymal plasticity: A central regulator of cancer
progression. Trends Cell Biol. 25:675–686. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
35
|
Padmanaban V, Krol I, Suhail Y, Szczerba
BM, Aceto N, Bader JS and Ewald AJ: E-cadherin is required for
metastasis in multiple models of breast cancer. Nature.
573:439–444. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
36
|
Scarpa E, Szabó A, Bibonne A, Theveneau E,
Parsons M and Mayor R: Cadherin switch during EMT in neural crest
cells leads to contact inhibition of locomotion via repolarization
of forces. Dev Cell. 34:421–434. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
37
|
Moriwaki K, Wada M, Kuwabara H, Ayani Y,
Terada T, Higashino M, Kawata R and Asahi M: BDNF/TRKB axis
provokes EMT progression to induce cell aggressiveness via
crosstalk with cancer-associated fibroblasts in human parotid gland
cancer. Sci Rep. 12:175532022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
38
|
Shih W and Yamada S: N-cadherin-mediated
cell-cell adhesion promotes cell migration in a three-dimensional
matrix. J Cell Sci. 125:3661–3670. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
39
|
Thiery JP, Acloque H, Huang RYJ and Nieto
MA: Epithelial-mesenchymal transitions in development and disease.
Cell. 139:871–890. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
40
|
Saénz-de-Santa-María I, Celada L and
Chiara MD: The leader position of mesenchymal cells expressing
N-cadherin in the collective migration of epithelial cancer. Cells.
9:7312020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
41
|
Labernadie A, Kato T, Brugués A,
Serra-Picamal X, Derzsi S, Arwert E, Weston A, González-Tarragó V,
Elosegui-Artola A, Albertazzi L, et al: A mechanically active
heterotypic E-cadherin/N-cadherin adhesion enables fibroblasts to
drive cancer cell invasion. Nat Cell Biol. 19:224–237. 2017.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
42
|
Van den Bossche J, Bogaert P, van Hengel
J, Guérin CJ, Berx G, Movahedi K, Van den Bergh R,
Pereira-Fernandes A, Geuns JM, Pircher H, et al: Alternatively
activated macrophages engage in homotypic and heterotypic
interactions through IL-4 and polyamine-induced E-cadherin/catenin
complexes. Blood. 114:4664–4674. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
43
|
Takai Y, Irie K, Shimizu K, Sakisaka T and
Ikeda W: Nectins and nectin-like molecules: Roles in cell adhesion,
migration, and polarization. Cancer Sci. 94:655–667. 2003.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
44
|
Izumi G, Sakisaka T, Baba T, Tanaka S,
Morimoto K and Takai Y: Endocytosis of E-cadherin regulated by Rac
and Cdc42 small G proteins through IQGAP1 and actin filaments. J
Cell Biol. 166:237–248. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
45
|
Takai Y, Miyoshi J, Ikeda W and Ogita H:
Nectins and nectin-like molecules: Roles in contact inhibition of
cell movement and proliferation. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 9:603–615.
2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
46
|
Ikeda W, Kakunaga S, Takekuni K, Shingai
T, Satoh K, Morimoto K, Takeuchi M, Imai T and Takai Y: Nectin-like
molecule-5/Tage4 enhances cell migration in an integrin-dependent,
Nectin-3-independent manner. J Biol Chem. 279:18015–18025. 2004.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
47
|
Bevelacqua V, Bevelacqua Y, Candido S,
Skarmoutsou E, Amoroso A, Guarneri C, Strazzanti A, Gangemi P,
Mazzarino MC, D'Amico F, et al: Nectin like-5 overexpression
correlates with the malignant phenotype in cutaneous melanoma.
Oncotarget. 3:882–892. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
48
|
Nakai R, Maniwa Y, Tanaka Y, Nishio W,
Yoshimura M, Okita Y, Ohbayashi C, Satoh N, Ogita H, Takai Y and
Hayashi Y: Overexpression of Necl-5 correlates with unfavorable
prognosis in patients with lung adenocarcinoma. Cancer Sci.
101:1326–1330. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
49
|
Kania A and Klein R: Mechanisms of
ephrin-Eph signalling in development, physiology and disease. Nat
Rev Mol Cell Biol. 17:240–256. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
50
|
Astin JW, Batson J, Kadir S, Charlet J,
Persad RA, Gillatt D, Oxley JD and Nobes CD: Competition amongst
Eph receptors regulates contact inhibition of locomotion and
invasiveness in prostate cancer cells. Nat Cell Biol. 12:1194–1204.
2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
51
|
Batson J, Astin JW and Nobes CD:
Regulation of contact inhibition of locomotion by Eph-ephrin
signalling. J Microsc. 251:232–241. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
52
|
Matthews HK, Marchant L, Carmona-Fontaine
C, Kuriyama S, Larraín J, Holt MR, Parsons M and Mayor R:
Directional migration of neural crest cells in vivo is regulated by
Syndecan-4/Rac1 and non-canonical Wnt signaling/RhoA. Development.
135:1771–1780. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
53
|
Kurayoshi M, Oue N, Yamamoto H, Kishida M,
Inoue A, Asahara T, Yasui W and Kikuchi A: Expression of Wnt-5a is
correlated with aggressiveness of gastric cancer by stimulating
cell migration and invasion. Cancer Res. 66:10439–10448. 2006.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
54
|
VanderVorst K, Dreyer CA, Konopelski SE,
Lee H, Ho HH and Carraway KL III: Wnt/PCP signaling contribution to
carcinoma collective cell migration and metastasis. Cancer Res.
79:1719–1729. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
55
|
Luga V, Zhang L, Viloria-Petit AM,
Ogunjimi AA, Inanlou MR, Chiu E, Buchanan M, Hosein AN, Basik M and
Wrana JL: Exosomes mediate stromal mobilization of autocrine
Wnt-PCP signaling in breast cancer cell migration. Cell.
151:1542–1556. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
56
|
Halbleib JM and Nelson WJ: Cadherins in
development: Cell adhesion, sorting, and tissue morphogenesis.
Genes Dev. 20:3199–3214. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
57
|
Wheeler AP and Ridley AJ: Why three Rho
proteins? RhoA, RhoB, RhoC, and cell motility. Exp Cell Res.
301:43–49. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
58
|
Theveneau E, Marchant L, Kuriyama S, Gull
M, Moepps B, Parsons M and Mayor R: Collective chemotaxis requires
contact-dependent cell polarity. Dev Cell. 19:39–53. 2010.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
59
|
Drees F, Pokutta S, Yamada S, Nelson WJ
and Weis WI: Alpha-catenin is a molecula r switch that binds
E-cadherin-beta-catenin and regulates actin-filament assembly.
Cell. 123:903–915. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
60
|
Anastasiadis PZ and Reynolds AB:
Regulation of Rho GTPases by p120-catenin. Curr Opin Cell Biol.
13:604–610. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
61
|
Macpherson IR, Hooper S, Serrels A,
McGarry L, Ozanne BW, Harrington K, Frame MC, Sahai E and Brunton
VG: p120-catenin is required for the collective invasion of
squamous cell carcinoma cells via a phosphorylation-independent
mechanism. Oncogene. 26:5214–5228. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
62
|
Noren NK, Liu BP, Burridge K and Kreft B:
p120 catenin regulates the actin cytoskeleton via Rho family
GTPases. J Cell Biol. 150:567–580. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
63
|
Nobes CD and Hall A: Rho, rac, and cdc42
GTPases regulate the assembly of multimolecular focal complexes
associated with actin stress fibers, lamellipodia, and filopodia.
Cell. 81:53–62. 1995. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
64
|
Kurokawa K and Matsuda M: Localized RhoA
activation as a requirement for the induction of membrane ruffling.
Mol Biol Cell. 16:4294–4303. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
65
|
Krause M and Gautreau A: Steering cell
migration: Lamellipodium dynamics and the regulation of directional
persistence. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 15:577–590. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
66
|
Haga RB and Ridley AJ: Rho GTPases:
Regulation and roles in cancer cell biology. Small GTPases.
7:207–221. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
67
|
Kim SY, Lee S, Lee E, Lim H, Shin JY, Jung
J, Kim SG and Moon A: Sex-biased differences in the correlation
between epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition-associated genes in
cancer cell lines. Oncol Lett. 18:6852–6868. 2019.PubMed/NCBI
|
|
68
|
Hidalgo-Carcedo C, Hooper S, Chaudhry SI,
Williamson P, Harrington K, Leitinger B and Sahai E: Collective
cell migration requires suppression of actomyosin at cell-cell
contacts mediated by DDR1 and the cell polarity regulators Par3 and
Par6. Nat Cell Biol. 13:49–58. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar :
|
|
69
|
Zaritsky A, Tseng YY, Rabadán MA, Krishna
S, Overholtzer M, Danuser G and Hall A: Diverse roles of guanine
nucleotide exchange factors in regulating collective cell
migration. J Cell Biol. 216:1543–1556. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
70
|
Runkle EA and Mu D: Tight junction
proteins: From barrier to tumorigenesis. Cancer Lett. 337:41–48.
2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
71
|
Kummer D, Steinbacher T, Thölmann S,
Schwietzer MF, Hartmann C, Horenkamp S, Demuth S, Peddibhotla SSD,
Brinkmann F, Kemper B, et al: A JAM-A-tetraspanin-αvβ5 integrin
complex regulates contact inhibition of locomotion. J Cell Biol.
221:e2021051472022. View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
72
|
Lamouille S, Xu J and Derynck R: Molecular
mechanisms of epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Nat Rev Mol Cell
Biol. 15:178–196. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
73
|
Davis JR, Luchici A, Mosis F, Thackery J,
Salazar JA, Mao Y, Dunn GA, Betz T, Miodownik M and Stramer BM:
Inter-cellular forces orchestrate contact inhibition of locomotion.
Cell. 161:361–373. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
74
|
Davis JR, Huang CY, Zanet J, Harrison S,
Rosten E, Cox S, Soong DY, Dunn GA and Stramer BM: Emergence of
embryonic pattern through contact inhibition of locomotion.
Development. 139:4555–4560. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
75
|
Guck J, Schinkinger S, Lincoln B, Wottawah
F, Ebert S, Romeyke M, Lenz D, Erickson HM, Ananthakrishnan R,
Mitchell D, et al: Optical deformability as an inherent cell marker
for testing malignant transformation and metastatic competence.
Biophys J. 88:3689–3698. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
76
|
Mialhe A, Lafanechère L, Treilleux I,
Peloux N, Dumontet C, Brémond A, Panh MH, Payan R, Wehland J,
Margolis RL and Job D: Tubulin detyrosination is a frequent
occurrence in breast cancers of poor prognosis. Cancer Res.
61:5024–5027. 2001.PubMed/NCBI
|
|
77
|
Daub H, Gevaert K, Vandekerckhove J, Sobel
A and Hall A: Rac/Cdc42 and p65PAK regulate the
microtubule-destabilizing protein stathmin through phosphorylation
at serine 16. J Biol Chem. 276:1677–1680. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
78
|
Moore R, Theveneau E, Pozzi S, Alexandre
P, Richardson J, Merks A, Parsons M, Kashef J, Linker C and Mayor
R: Par3 controls neural crest migration by promoting microtubule
catastrophe during contact inhibition of locomotion. Development.
140:4763–4775. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
79
|
Cramer LP: Forming the cell rear first:
Breaking cell symmetry to trigger directed cell migration. Nat Cell
Biol. 12:628–632. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
80
|
Yam PT, Wilson CA, Ji L, Hebert B,
Barnhart EL, Dye NA, Wiseman PW, Danuser G and Theriot JA:
Actin-myosin network reorganization breaks symmetry at the cell
rear to spontaneously initiate polarized cell motility. J Cell
Biol. 178:1207–1221. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
81
|
Olson HM and Nechiporuk AV: Using
zebrafish to study collective cell migration in development and
disease. Front Cell Dev Biol. 6:832018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
82
|
Ozawa M, Hiver S, Yamamoto T, Shibata T,
Upadhyayula S, Mimori-Kiyosue Y and Takeichi M: Adherens junction
regulates cryptic lamellipodia formation for epithelial cell
migration. J Cell Biol. 219:e2020061962020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
83
|
Yokoyama S, Matsui TS and Deguchi S: New
wrinkling substrate assay reveals traction force fields of leader
and follower cells undergoing collective migration. Biochem Biophys
Res Commun. 482:975–979. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
84
|
Jakobsson L, Franco CA, Bentley K, Collins
RT, Ponsioen B, Aspalter IM, Rosewell I, Busse M, Thurston G,
Medvinsky A, et al: Endothelial cells dynamically compete for the
tip cell position during angiogenic sprouting. Nat Cell Biol.
12:943–953. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
85
|
Ghabrial AS and Krasnow MA: Social
interactions among epithelial cells during tracheal branching
morphogenesis. Nature. 441:746–749. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
86
|
Nguyen-Ngoc KV, Cheung KJ, Brenot A,
Shamir ER, Gray RS, Hines WC, Yaswen P, Werb Z and Ewald AJ: ECM
microenvironment regulates collective migration and local
dissemination in normal and malignant mammary epithelium. Proc Natl
Acad Sci USA. 109:E2595–E2604. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
87
|
Cheung KJ, Gabrielson E, Werb Z and Ewald
AJ: Collective invasion in breast cancer requires a conserved basal
epithelial program. Cell. 155:1639–1651. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
88
|
Cai D, Chen SC, Prasad M, He L, Wang X,
Choesmel-Cadamuro V, Sawyer JK, Danuser G and Montell DJ:
Mechanical feedback through E-cadherin promotes direction sensing
during collective cell migration. Cell. 157:1146–1159. 2014.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
89
|
Inaki M, Vishnu S, Cliffe A and Rørth P:
Effective guidance of collective migration based on differences in
cell states. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 109:2027–2032. 2012.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
90
|
Okimura C, Iwanaga M, Sakurai T, Ueno T,
Urano Y and Iwadate Y: Leading-edge elongation by follower cell
interruption in advancing epithelial cell sheets. Proc Natl Acad
Sci USA. 119:e21199031192022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
91
|
Vishwakarma M, Di Russo J, Probst D,
Schwarz US, Das T and Spatz JP: Mechanical interactions among
followers determine the emergence of leaders in migrating
epithelial cell collectives. Nat Commun. 9:34692018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
92
|
Bocci F, Onuchic JN and Jolly MK:
Understanding the principles of pattern formation driven by notch
signaling by integrating experiments and theoretical models. Front
Physiol. 11:9292020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
93
|
DeMali KA and Burridge K: Coupling
membrane protrusion and cell adhesion. J Cell Sci. 116:2389–2397.
2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
94
|
DeCamp SJ, Tsuda VMK, Ferruzzi J, Koehler
SA, Giblin JT, Roblyer D, Zaman MH, Weiss ST, Kılıç A, De Marzio M,
et al: Epithelial layer unjamming shifts energy metabolism toward
glycolysis. Sci Rep. 10:183022020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
95
|
Weber GF, Bjerke MA and DeSimone DW: A
mechanoresponsive cadherin-keratin complex directs polarized
protrusive behavior and collective cell migration. Dev Cell.
22:104–115. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar :
|
|
96
|
Chen T, Saw TB, Mège RM and Ladoux B:
Mechanical forces in cell monolayers. J Cell Sci.
131:jcs2181562018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
97
|
Tambe DT, Hardin CC, Angelini TE,
Rajendran K, Park CY, Serra-Picamal X, Zhou EH, Zaman MH, Butler
JP, Weitz DA, et al: Collective cell guidance by cooperative
intercellular forces. Nat Mater. 10:469–475. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
98
|
Trepat X, Wasserman MR, Angelini TE,
Millet E, Weitz DA, Butler JP and Fredberg JJ: Physical forces
during collective cell migration. Nat Phys. 5:426–430. 2009.
View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
99
|
Gayrard C, Bernaudin C, Déjardin T, Seiler
C and Borghi N: Src- and confinement-dependent FAK activation
causes E-cadherin relaxation and β-catenin activity. J Cell Biol.
217:1063–1077. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
100
|
Desai RA, Gopal SB, Chen S and Chen CS:
Contact inhibition of locomotion probabilities drive solitary
versus collective cell migration. J R Soc Interface.
10:201307172013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
101
|
Thomas WA, Boscher C, Chu YS, Cuvelier D,
Martinez-Rico C, Seddiki R, Heysch J, Ladoux B, Thiery JP, Mege RM
and Dufour S: α-Catenin and vinculin cooperate to promote high
E-cadherin-based adhesion strength. J Biol Chem. 288:4957–4969.
2013. View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
102
|
Seddiki R, Narayana GHNS, Strale PO,
Balcioglu HE, Peyret G, Yao M, Le AP, Teck Lim C, Yan J, Ladoux B
and Mège RM: Force-dependent binding of vinculin to α-catenin
regulates cell-cell contact stability and collective cell behavior.
Mol Biol Cell. 29:380–388. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar :
|
|
103
|
Matsuzawa K, Himoto T, Mochizuki Y and
Ikenouchi J: α-Catenin controls the anisotropy of force
distribution at cell-cell junctions during collective cell
migration. Cell Rep. 23:3447–3456. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
104
|
Bazellières E, Conte V, Elosegui-Artola A,
Serra-Picamal X, Bintanel-Morcillo M, Roca-Cusachs P, Muñoz JJ,
Sales-Pardo M, Guimerà R and Trepat X: Control of cell-cell forces
and collective cell dynamics by the intercellular adhesome. Nat
Cell Biol. 17:409–420. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
105
|
Plutoni C, Bazellieres E, Le Borgne-Rochet
M, Comunale F, Brugues A, Séveno M, Planchon D, Thuault S, Morin N,
Bodin S, et al: P-cadherin promotes collective cell migration via a
Cdc42-mediated increase in mechanical forces. J Cell Biol.
212:199–217. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
106
|
Liu Z, Tan JL, Cohen DM, Yang MT,
Sniadecki NJ, Ruiz SA, Nelson CM and Chen CS: Mechanical tugging
force regulates the size of cell-cell junctions. Proc Natl Acad Sci
USA. 107:9944–9949. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
107
|
Crawford AJ, Gomez-Cruz C, Russo GC, Huang
W, Bhorkar I, uñoz-Barrutia A, Wirtz D and Garcia-Gonzalez D: Tumor
proliferation and invasion are coupled through cell-extracellular
matrix friction. bioRxiv. 2022.2011:2015.5165482022.
|
|
108
|
Lee MH, Russo G, Rahmanto YS, Du W,
Crawford AJ, Wu PH, Gilkes D, Kiemen A, Miyamoto T, Yu Y, et al:
Multi-compartment tumor organoids. Mater Today. 61:104–116. 2022.
View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
109
|
Russo GC, Crawford AJ, Clark D, Cui J,
Carney R, Karl MN, Su B, Starich B, Lih T, Kamat P, et al:
E-cadherin interacts with EGFR resulting in hyper-activation of ERK
in multiple models of breast cancer. bioRxiv. 2020.
|
|
110
|
Muhamed I, Wu J, Sehgal P, Kong X, Tajik
A, Wang N and Leckband DE: E-cadherin-mediated force transduction
signals regulate global cell mechanics. J Cell Sci. 129:1843–1854.
2016.PubMed/NCBI
|
|
111
|
Barry AK, Tabdili H, Muhamed I, Wu J,
Shashikanth N, Gomez GA, Yap AS, Gottardi CJ, de Rooij J, Wang N
and Leckband DE: α-catenin cytomechanics-role in cadherin-dependent
adhesion and mechanotransduction. J Cell Sci. 127:1779–1791. 2014.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
112
|
Benham-Pyle BW, Pruitt BL and Nelson WJ:
Cell adhesion. Mechanical strain induces E-cadherin-dependent Yap1
and β-catenin activation to drive cell cycle entry. Science.
348:1024–1027. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
113
|
Röper JC, Mitrossilis D, Stirnemann G,
Waharte F, Brito I, Fernandez-Sanchez ME, Baaden M, Salamero J and
Farge E: The major β-catenin/E-cadherin junctional binding site is
a primary molecular mechano-transductor of differentiation in vivo.
Elife. 7:e333812018. View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
114
|
Fernández-Sánchez ME, Barbier S, Whitehead
J, Béalle G, Michel A, Latorre-Ossa H, Rey C, Fouassier L, Claperon
A, Brullé L, et al: Mechanical induction of the tumorigenic
β-catenin pathway by tumour growth pressure. Nature. 523:92–95.
2015. View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
115
|
Hino N, Rossetti L, Marín-Llauradó A, Aoki
K, Trepat X, Matsuda M and Hirashima T: ERK-mediated
mechanochemical waves direct collective cell polarization. Dev
Cell. 53:646–660.e8. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
116
|
Coló GP, Hernández-Varas P, Lock J,
Bartolomé RA, Arellano-Sánchez N, Strömblad S and Teixidó J: Focal
adhesion disassembly is regulated by a RIAM to MEK-1 pathway. J
Cell Sci. 125:5338–5352. 2012.PubMed/NCBI
|
|
117
|
Das T, Safferling K, Rausch S, Grabe N,
Boehm H and Spatz JP: A molecular mechanotransduction pathway
regulates collective migration of epithelial cells. Nat Cell Biol.
17:276–287. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
118
|
Colak-Champollion T, Lan L, Jadhav AR,
Yamaguchi N, Venkiteswaran G, Patel H, Cammer M,
Meier-Schellersheim M and Knaut H: Cadherin-mediated cell coupling
coordinates chemokine sensing across collectively migrating cells.
Curr Biol. 29:2570–2579.e7. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
119
|
Heneberg P: Paracrine tumor signaling
induces transdifferentiation of surrounding fibroblasts. Crit Rev
Oncol Hematol. 97:303–311. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
120
|
Barbazán J and Matic Vignjevic D: Cancer
associated fibroblasts: Is the force the path to the dark side?
Curr Opin Cell Biol. 56:71–79. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
121
|
Ishii G, Ochiai A and Neri S: Phenotypic
and functional heterogeneity of cancer-associated fibroblast within
the tumor microenvironment. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 99:186–196. 2016.
View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
122
|
Attaran S, Skoko JJ, Hopkins BL, Wright
MK, Wood LE, Asan A, Woo HA, Feinberg A and Neumann CA:
Peroxiredoxin-1 Tyr194 phosphorylation regulates LOX-dependent
extracellular matrix remodelling in breast cancer. Br J Cancer.
125:1146–1157. 2021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
123
|
Winkler J, Abisoye-Ogunniyan A, Metcalf KJ
and Werb Z: Concepts of extracellular matrix remodelling in tumour
progression and metastasis. Nat Commun. 11:51202020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
124
|
Kai F, Drain AP and Weaver VM: The
extracellular matrix modulates the metastatic journey. Dev Cell.
49:332–346. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
125
|
Poltavets V, Kochetkova M, Pitson SM and
Samuel MS: The role of the extracellular matrix and its molecular
and cellular regulators in cancer cell plasticity. Front Oncol.
8:4312018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
126
|
Levental KR, Yu H, Kass L, Lakins JN,
Egeblad M, Erler JT, Fong SF, Csiszar K, Giaccia A, Weninger W, et
al: Matrix crosslinking forces tumor progression by enhancing
integrin signaling. Cell. 139:891–906. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
127
|
Elosegui-Artola A, Oria R, Chen Y,
Kosmalska A, Pérez-González C, Castro N, Zhu C, Trepat X and
Roca-Cusachs P: Mechanical regulation of a molecular clutch defines
force transmission and transduction in response to matrix rigidity.
Nat Cell Biol. 18:540–548. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
128
|
Miranti CK and Brugge JS: Sensing the
environment: A historical perspective on integrin signal
transduction. Nat Cell Biol. 4:E83–E90. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
129
|
Maritzen T, Schachtner H and Legler DF: On
the move: Endocytic trafficking in cell migration. Cell Mol Life
Sci. 72:2119–2134. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
130
|
Sawada Y, Tamada M, Dubin-Thaler BJ,
Cherniavskaya O, Sakai R, Tanaka S and Sheetz MP: Force sensing by
mechanical extension of the Src family kinase substrate p130Cas.
Cell. 127:1015–1026. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
131
|
Tamada M, Sheetz MP and Sawada Y:
Activation of a signaling cascade by cytoskeleton stretch. Dev
Cell. 7:709–718. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
132
|
Van Helvert S, Storm C and Friedl P:
Mechanoreciprocity in cell migration. Nat Cell Biol. 20:8–20. 2018.
View Article : Google Scholar :
|
|
133
|
Keating M, Kurup A, Alvarez-Elizondo M,
Levine AJ and Botvinick E: Spatial distributions of pericellular
stiffness in natural extracellular matrices are dependent on
cell-mediated proteolysis and contractility. Acta Biomater.
57:304–312. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
134
|
Bi D, Lopez JH, Schwarz JM and Manning ML:
A density-independent rigidity transition in biological tissues.
Nat Phys. 11:1074–1079. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
135
|
Wolf K, Te Lindert M, Krause M, Alexander
S, Te Riet J, Willis AL, Hoffman RM, Figdor CG, Weiss SJ and Friedl
P: Physical limits of cell migration: Control by ECM space and
nuclear deformation and tuning by proteolysis and traction force. J
Cell Biol. 201:1069–1084. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
136
|
Han YL, Ronceray P, Xu G, Malandrino A,
Kamm RD, Lenz M, Broedersz CP and Guo M: Cell contraction induces
long-ranged stress stiffening in the extracellular matrix. Proc
Natl Acad Sci USA. 115:4075–4080. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
137
|
Roomi MW, Monterrey JC, Kalinovsky T, Rath
M and Niedzwiecki A: Patterns of MMP-2 and MMP-9 expression in
human cancer cell lines. Oncol Rep. 21:1323–1333. 2009.PubMed/NCBI
|
|
138
|
Isomursu A, Park KY, Hou J, Cheng B,
Mathieu M, Shamsan GA, Fuller B, Kasim J, Mahmoodi MM, Lu TJ, et
al: Directed cell migration towards softer environments. Nat Mater.
21:1081–1090. 2022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
139
|
Sunyer R, Conte V, Escribano J,
Elosegui-Artola A, Labernadie A, Valon L, Navajas D, García-Aznar
JM, Muñoz JJ, Roca-Cusachs P and Trepat X: Collective cell
durotaxis emerges from long-range intercellular force transmission.
Science. 353:1157–1161. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
140
|
Gilkes DM, Bajpai S, Chaturvedi P, Wirtz D
and Semenza GL: Hypoxia-inducible factor 1 (HIF-1) promotes
extracellular matrix remodeling under hypoxic conditions by
inducing P4HA1, P4HA2, and PLOD2 expression in fibroblasts. J Biol
Chem. 288:10819–10829. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
141
|
Chandler EM, Saunders MP, Yoon CJ, Gourdon
D and Fischbach C: Adipose progenitor cells increase fibronectin
matrix strain and unfolding in breast tumors. Phys Biol.
8:0150082011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
142
|
Guiet R, Van Goethem E, Cougoule C, Balor
S, Valette A, Al Saati T, Lowell CA, Le Cabec V and
Maridonneau-Parini I: The process of macrophage migration promotes
matrix metalloproteinase-independent invasion by tumor cells. J
Immunol. 187:3806–3814. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
143
|
Vilchez Mercedes SA, Bocci F, Levine H,
Onuchic JN, Jolly MK and Wong PK: Decoding leader cells in
collective cancer invasion. Nat Rev Cancer. 21:592–604. 2021.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
144
|
Artym VV, Zhang Y, Seillier-Moiseiwitsch
F, Yamada KM and Mueller SC: Dynamic interactions of cortactin and
membrane type 1 matrix metalloproteinase at invadopodia: Defining
the stages of invadopodia formation and function. Cancer Res.
66:3034–3043. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
145
|
Hoshino D, Kirkbride KC, Costello K, Clark
ES, Sinha S, Grega-Larson N, Tyska MJ and Weaver AM: Exosome
secretion is enhanced by invadopodia and drives invasive behavior.
Cell Rep. 5:1159–1168. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
146
|
Han T, Kang D, Ji D, Wang X, Zhan W, Fu M,
Xin HB and Wang JB: How does cancer cell metabolism affect tumor
migration and invasion? Cell Adh Migr. 7:395–403. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
147
|
Kim KS, Sengupta S, Berk M, Kwak YG,
Escobar PF, Belinson J, Mok SC and Xu Y: Hypoxia enhances
lysophosphatidic acid responsiveness in ovarian cancer cells and
lysophosphatidic acid induces ovarian tumor metastasis in vivo.
Cancer Res. 66:7983–7990. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
148
|
Egeblad M, Rasch MG and Weaver VM: Dynamic
interplay between the collagen scaffold and tumor evolution. Curr
Opin Cell Biol. 22:697–706. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
149
|
Rofstad EK, Mathiesen B, Kindem K and
Galappathi K: Acidic extracellular pH promotes experimental
metastasis of human melanoma cells in athymic nude mice. Cancer
Res. 66:6699–6707. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
150
|
Pedron S, Becka E and Harley BA:
Regulation of glioma cell phenotype in 3D matrices by hyaluronic
acid. Biomaterials. 34:7408–7417. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
151
|
Cha J, Kang SG and Kim P: Strategies of
mesenchymal invasion of patient-derived brain tumors:
Microenvironmental adaptation. Sci Rep. 6:249122016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
152
|
Kim Y and Kumar S: CD44-mediated adhesion
to hyaluronic acid contributes to mechanosensing and invasive
motility. Mol Cancer Res. 12:1416–1429. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
153
|
Belousov A, Titov S, Shved N, Garbuz M,
Malykin G, Gulaia V, Kagansky A and Kumeiko V: The extracellular
matrix and biocompatible materials in glioblastoma treatment. Front
Bioeng Biotechnol. 7:3412019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
154
|
Serres E, Debarbieux F, Stanchi F,
Maggiorella L, Grall D, Turchi L, Burel-Vandenbos F,
Figarella-Branger D, Virolle T, Rougon G and Van
Obberghen-Schilling E: Fibronectin expression in glioblastomas
promotes cell cohesion, collective invasion of basement membrane in
vitro and orthotopic tumor growth in mice. Oncogene. 33:3451–3462.
2014. View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
155
|
Condeelis J, Singer RH and Segall JE: The
great escape: When cancer cells hijack the genes for chemotaxis and
motility. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 21:695–718. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
156
|
Tweedy L, Thomason PA, Paschke PI, Martin
K, Machesky LM, Zagnoni M and Insall RH: Seeing around corners:
Cells solve mazes and respond at a distance using attractant
breakdown. Science. 369:eaay97922020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
157
|
Susanto O, Koh YWH, Morrice N, Tumanov S,
Thomason PA, Nielson M, Tweedy L, Muinonen-Martin AJ, Kamphorst JJ,
Mackay GM and Insall RH: LPP3 mediates self-generation of
chemotactic LPA gradients by melanoma cells. J Cell Sci.
130:3455–3466. 2017.PubMed/NCBI
|
|
158
|
Tweedy L, Knecht DA, Mackay GM and Insall
RH: Self-generated chemoattractant gradients: Attractant depletion
extends the range and robustness of chemotaxis. PLoS Biol.
14:e10024042016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
159
|
Scherber C, Aranyosi AJ, Kulemann B,
Thayer SP, Toner M, Iliopoulos O and Irimia D: Epithelial cell
guidance by self-generated EGF gradients. Integr Biol (Camb).
4:259–269. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
160
|
Muinonen-Martin AJ, Susanto O, Zhang Q,
Smethurst E, Faller WJ, Veltman DM, Kalna G, Lindsay C, Bennett DC,
Sansom OJ, et al: Melanoma cells break down LPA to establish local
gradients that drive chemotactic dispersal. PLoS Biol.
12:e10019662014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
161
|
Sobolik T, Su YJ, Wells S, Ayers GD, Cook
RS and Richmond A: CXCR4 drives the metastatic phenotype in breast
cancer through induction of CXCR2 and activation of MEK and PI3K
pathways. Mol Biol Cell. 25:566–582. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
162
|
Malet-Engra G, Yu W, Oldani A, Rey-Barroso
J, Gov NS, Scita G and Dupré L: Collective cell motility promotes
chemotactic prowess and resistance to chemorepulsion. Curr Biol.
25:242–250. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
163
|
Boucharaba A, Serre CM, Grès S,
Saulnier-Blache JS, Bordet JC, Guglielmi J, Clézardin P and
Peyruchaud O: Platelet-derived lysophosphatidic acid supports the
progression of osteolytic bone metastases in breast cancer. J Clin
Invest. 114:1714–1725. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
164
|
Zhao C, Sardella A, Chun J, Poubelle PE,
Fernandes MJ and Bourgoin SG: TNF-alpha promotes LPA1- and
LPA3-mediated recruitment of leukocytes in vivo through CXCR2
ligand chemokines. J Lipid Res. 52:1307–1318. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
165
|
Juin A, Spence HJ, Martin KJ, McGhee E,
Neilson M, Cutiongco MFA, Gadegaard N, Mackay G, Fort L, Lilla S,
et al: N-WASP control of LPAR1 trafficking establishes response to
self-Generated LPA gradients to promote pancreatic cancer cell
metastasis. Dev Cell. 51:431–445.e7. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
166
|
Tweedy L and Insall RH: Self-generated
gradients yield exceptionally robust steering cues. Front Cell Dev
Biol. 8:1332020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
167
|
Bray SJ: Notch signalling in context. Nat
Rev Mol Cell Biol. 17:722–735. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
168
|
Bocci F, Gearhart-Serna L, Boareto M,
Ribeiro M, Ben-Jacob E, Devi GR, Levine H, Onuchic JN and Jolly MK:
Toward understanding cancer stem cell heterogeneity in the tumor
microenvironment. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 116:148–157. 2019.
View Article : Google Scholar :
|
|
169
|
Lewis J: Notch signalling and the control
of cell fate choices in vertebrates. Semin Cell Dev Biol.
9:583–589. 1998. View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
170
|
Tashima Y and Okajima T: Congenital
diseases caused by defective O-glycosylation of notch receptors.
Nagoya J Med Sci. 80:299–307. 2018.PubMed/NCBI
|
|
171
|
Shimojo H, Ohtsuka T and Kageyama R:
Dynamic expression of notch signaling genes in neural
stem/progenitor cells. Front Neurosci. 5:782011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
172
|
Manderfield LJ, High FA, Engleka KA, Liu
F, Li L, Rentschler S and Epstein JA: Notch activation of Jagged1
contributes to the assembly of the arterial wall. Circulation.
125:314–323. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar :
|
|
173
|
Boareto M, Jolly MK, Lu M, Onuchic JN,
Clementi C and Ben-Jacob E: Jagged-Delta asymmetry in notch
signaling can give rise to a sender/receiver hybrid phenotype. Proc
Natl Acad Sci USA. 112:E402–E409. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
174
|
Luca VC, Jude KM, Pierce NW, Nachury MV,
Fischer S and Garcia KC: Structural biology. Structural basis for
Notch1 engagement of Delta-like 4. Science. 347:847–853. 2015.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
175
|
Rana NA and Haltiwanger RS: Fringe
benefits: Functional and structural impacts of O-glycosylation on
the extracellular domain of notch receptors. Curr Opin Struct Biol.
21:583–589. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
176
|
Jolly MK, Boareto M, Lu M, Onuchic JN,
Clementi C and Ben-Jacob E: Operating principles of
Notch-Delta-Jagged module of cell-cell communication. New J Phys.
17:0550212015. View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
177
|
Ruhrberg C, Gerhardt H, Golding M, Watson
R, Ioannidou S, Fujisawa H, Betsholtz C and Shima DT: Spatially
restricted patterning cues provided by heparin-binding VEGF-A
control blood vessel branching morphogenesis. Genes Dev.
16:2684–2698. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
178
|
Lobov IB, Renard RA, Papadopoulos N, Gale
NW, Thurston G, Yancopoulos GD and Wiegand SJ: Delta-like ligand 4
(Dll4) is induced by VEGF as a negative regulator of angiogenic
sprouting. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 104:3219–3224. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
179
|
Benedito R, Rocha SF, Woeste M, Zamykal M,
Radtke F, Casanovas O, Duarte A, Pytowski B and Adams RH:
Notch-dependent VEGFR3 upregulation allows angiogenesis without
VEGF-VEGFR2 signalling. Nature. 484:110–114. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
180
|
Noguera-Troise I, Daly C, Papadopoulos NJ,
Coetzee S, Boland P, Gale NW, Lin HC, Yancopoulos GD and Thurston
G: Blockade of Dll4 inhibits tumour growth by promoting
non-productive angiogenesis. Nature. 444:1032–1037. 2006.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
181
|
Han M, Xu W, Cheng P, Jin H and Wang X:
Histone demethylase lysine demethylase 5B in development and
cancer. Oncotarget. 8:8980–8991. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar :
|
|
182
|
Zheng YC, Chang J, Wang LC, Ren HM, Pang
JR and Liu HM: Lysine demethylase 5B (KDM5B): A potential
anti-cancer drug target. Eur J Med Chem. 161:131–140. 2019.
View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
183
|
Horton JR, Engstrom A, Zoeller EL, Liu X,
Shanks JR, Zhang X, Johns MA, Vertino PM, Fu H and Cheng X:
Characterization of a linked jumonji domain of the KDM5/JARID1
family of histone H3 lysine 4 demethylases. J Biol Chem.
291:2631–2646. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar :
|
|
184
|
Hinohara K, Wu HJ, Vigneau S, McDonald TO,
Igarashi KJ, Yamamoto KN, Madsen T, Fassl A, Egri SB, Papanastasiou
M, et al: KDM5 histone demethylase activity links cellular
transcriptomic heterogeneity to therapeutic resistance. Cancer
Cell. 34:939–953.e9. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
185
|
Goley ED and Welch MD: The ARP2/3 complex:
An actin nucleator comes of age. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 7:713–726.
2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
186
|
Hsu PP and Sabatini DM: Cancer cell
metabolism: Warburg and beyond. Cell. 134:703–707. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
187
|
Faubert B, Solmonson A and DeBerardinis
RJ: Metabolic reprogramming and cancer progression. Science.
368:eaaw54732020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
188
|
Warhurg O, Posener K and Negelein E: Über
den Stoffwechsel der Carcinomzelle. Naturwissenschaften.
12:1131–1137. 1924. View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
189
|
Zanotelli MR, Rahman-Zaman A, VanderBurgh
JA, Taufalele PV, Jain A, Erickson D, Bordeleau F and Reinhart-King
CA: Energetic costs regulated by cell mechanics and confinement are
predictive of migration path during decision-making. Nat Commun.
10:41852019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
190
|
Commander R, Wei C, Sharma A, Mouw JK,
Burton LJ, Summerbell E, Mahboubi D, Peterson RJ, Konen J, Zhou W,
et al: Subpopulation targeting of pyruvate dehydrogenase and GLUT1
decouples metabolic heterogeneity during collective cancer cell
invasion. Nat Commun. 11:15332020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
191
|
Tan Z, Yang C, Zhang X, Zheng P and Shen
W: Expression of glucose transporter 1 and prognosis in non-small
cell lung cancer: A pooled analysis of 1665 patients. Oncotarget.
8:609542017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
192
|
Yu M, Yongzhi H, Chen S, Luo X, Lin Y,
Zhou Y, Jin H, Hou B, Deng Y, Tu L and Jian Z: The prognostic value
of GLUT1 in cancers: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Oncotarget. 8:43356–43367. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
193
|
Carvalho KC, Cunha IW, Rocha RM, Ayala FR,
Cajaíba MM, Begnami MD, Vilela RS, Paiva GR, Andrade RG and Soares
FA: GLUT1 expression in malignant tumors and its use as an
immunodiagnostic marker. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 66:965–972. 2011.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
194
|
Bos R, van Der Hoeven JJ, van Der Wall E,
van Der Groep P, van Diest PJ, Comans EF, Joshi U, Semenza GL,
Hoekstra OS, Lammertsma AA and Molthoff CF: Biologic correlates of
(18) fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in human breast cancer measured by
positron emission tomography. J Clin Oncol. 20:379–387. 2002.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
195
|
Schwartzenberg-Bar-Yoseph F, Armoni M and
Karnieli E: The tumor suppressor p53 down-regulates glucose
transporters GLUT1 and GLUT4 gene expression. Cancer Res.
64:2627–2633. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
196
|
Chen C, Pore N, Behrooz A, Ismail-Beigi F
and Maity A: Regulation of glut1 mRNA by hypoxia-inducible
factor-1. Interaction between H-ras and hypoxia. J Biol Chem.
276:9519–9525. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
197
|
Tanegashima K, Sato-Miyata Y, Funakoshi M,
Nishito Y, Aigaki T and Hara T: Epigenetic regulation of the
glucose transporter gene Slc2a1 by β-hydroxybutyrate underlies
preferential glucose supply to the brain of fasted mice. Genes
Cells. 22:71–83. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
198
|
Barthel A, Okino ST, Liao J, Nakatani K,
Li J, Whitlock JP Jr and Roth RA: Regulation of GLUT1 gene
transcription by the serine/threonine kinase Akt1. J Biol Chem.
274:20281–20286. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
199
|
Cunniff B, McKenzie AJ, Heintz NH and Howe
AK: AMPK activity regulates trafficking of mitochondria to the
leading edge during cell migration and matrix invasion. Mol Biol
Cell. 27:2662–2674. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
200
|
Alert R and Trepat X: Physical models of
collective cell migration. Annu Rev Condens Matter Phys. 11:77–101.
2020. View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
201
|
Merino-Casallo F, Gomez-Benito MJ,
Hervas-Raluy S and Garcia-Aznar JM: Unravelling cell migration:
Defining movement from the cell surface. Cell Adh Migr. 16:25–64.
2022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
