Open Access

NCAPH is negatively associated with Mcl‑1 in non‑small cell lung cancer

  • Authors:
    • Qiuxia Xiong
    • Songqing Fan
    • Lincan Duan
    • Baiyang Liu
    • Xiulin Jiang
    • Xiaobo Chen
    • Chunyan Xiong
    • Qingyuan Tao
    • Juan Wang
    • Hui Zhang
    • Chuanjiang Chen
    • Yong Duan
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: July 28, 2020     https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2020.11359
  • Pages: 2916-2924
  • Copyright: © Xiong et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License.

Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

Lung cancer has a high mortality rate worldwide. Non‑SMC condensin I complex subunit H (NCAPH) has been identified to be one of the regulatory subunits of the condensin I complex, which is essential for the correct packaging and segregation of chromosomes in eukaryotes. NCAPH is abnormally overexpressed in various types of cancer. A pro‑survival member of the Bcl‑2 family, myeloid cell leukemia sequence 1 (Mcl‑1) is also frequently overexpressed in multiple cancers and is associated with poorer clinical outcomes for patients. The association of NCAPH and Mcl‑1 proteins with the clinical and pathological features of non‑small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains to be elucidated. In the current study, the positive percentage of NCAPH in the non‑cancerous lung tissues was revealed to be higher compared with that in NSCLC. However, the positive percentage of Mcl‑1 in the non‑cancerous lung tissues was lower compared with NSCLC. In addition, NCAPH high‑expression patients had a higher overall survival rate compared with patients exhibiting low expression, whereas the Mcl‑1 high‑expression group had a lower survival rate. Pairwise association in 260 cases of NSCLC revealed that overexpression of the NCAPH protein was negatively associated with Mcl‑1 expression and vice versa. The results of multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression analysis also indicated that NCAPH and Mcl‑1 demonstrated potential as distinct prognostic factors that may be used in NSCLC. The expression of NCAPH and Mcl‑1 may be associated with, and act as distinct molecular marks for the prediction of a poor prognosis in patients with NSCLC.

Introduction

Lung cancer has been widely acknowledged to have the highest mortality of all cancer types worldwide, and is classified pathologically as non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and small cell lung cancer (SCLC) (1). Lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) and lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC) are identified as the most common subtypes of NSCLC (2). Surgery is the most general treatment for early-stage NSCLC, and the combination of cytotoxic and platinum drugs has become the standard for NSCLC chemotherapy (3). However, the long-term survival for postoperative patients with NSCLC remains poor. Previous studies have indicated that the five-year survival rates of patients with NSCLC with stage Ia, Ib, IIa and IIb are 70, 60, 55 and 40%, respectively (4,5). Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy has a limited effect on improving the survival rate of patients with NSCLC (6). The biomarker cluster of differentiation 24, has been recently identified for use in the prediction of NSCLC disease-free survival (7). However, there are other promising biomarkers with confirmed prognostic value in NSCLC, including matrix metallopeptidase 9, aurora kinase A and enhancer of zeste 2 polycomb repressive complex 2 subunit (8).

Non-SMC condensin I complex subunit H (NCAPH) is a member of the condensin I complex, which is a recently identified superfamily of proteins termed kleisins (9). Condensin I complex consists of three non-SMC subunits; NCAPH, chromosome-associated protein (CAP)D2 and CAPG (10). Condensin serves an indispensable role in chromosome-wide gene regulation and therefore controls the architecture and segregation of sister chromatids (11). In the presence of type I topoisomerase, the condensin complex may introduce positive supercoils into relaxed DNA, while type II topoisomerase is involved in nicked DNA transformation into a positive knotted form (12). Biallelic mutations in CAPD2, NCAPH or CAPD3 are essential to ensure accurate mitotic chromosome condensation in neuron stem cells, ultimately affecting neuron pool and cortex size (13). The authors of the present study previously demonstrated that NCAPH is highly expressed in colon cancer, the knockdown of which inhibits cell proliferation, migration, and xenograft tumor formation abilities (14). However, patients with colon cancer and the overexpression of NCAPH have a markedly improved prognosis compared with patients who demonstrate low-expression of NCAPH (14). Other studies note that highly expressed condensin I complex in non-SMC is associated with the progression of multiple human cancers: Ryu et al (15) demonstrated that NCAPH is expressed at a higher level in metastatic melanoma cell lines compared with less aggressive primary tumor cell lines. Other studies have revealed that NCAPH can serve as a potential prognostic indicator for hepatocellular carcinoma and nasopharyngeal cancer (16).

A number of antigens, including carbohydrate antigen 125, are commonly used clinically as auxiliary indicators for the diagnosis of lung cancer, but they exhibit low sensitivity (17). Myeloid cell leukemia sequence 1 (Mcl-1), which is a member of the Bcl-2 family, was originally considered to be an effective short-term promoter for cell survival during the differentiation of bone marrow cells (1821). Studies have demonstrated that Mcl-1 is a pro-survival protein that is overexpressed in human malignant tumors (22,23). Mcl-1, which is involved in chemotherapy resistance and metastasis, is often highly expressed in NSCLC and its association with other markers can improve diagnostic sensitivity (24). The intrinsic apoptotic signaling pathway is closely associated with NCAPH (GO:0097193: http://www.coexpedia.org/) (25). The dual expression of NCAPH and Mcl-1 proteins, and their association with clinical and pathological features in NSCLC remain unknown, with the exception of the aforementioned studies.

In the present study, the expression of NCAPH and Mcl-1 was determined in 260 cases of NSCLC, and the association of NCAPH and Mcl-1 expression with clinical and pathological characteristics of NSCLC, and its prognosis, was discussed.

Materials and methods

Clinical data

Paraffin-embedded NSCLC tissues from 260 patients diagnosed with primary NSCLC, none of whom had received any treatment before the surgery. All patients had complete clinical and follow-up data. (194 males and 66 females, mean age 60.1±12.76), and 52 control non-cancerous lung disease sections (37 males and 15 females, mean age 57.45±14.56), including bronchiectasis and pneumatocele, were collected from the Second Xiangya Hospital between January 2010 and December 2016. The present study was approved by the Scientific and Research Ethics Committee of the Second Xiangya Hospital (approval no. S039/2011). Patients were fully informed about specimen usage and data retrieval prior to the acquisition of specimens. No information or images that may expose any relevant patient identification or violate any individual rights are presented in the present study. Written informed consent was obtained from each patient. Informed consent was obtained from a parent and/or legal guardian for subjects <18 years old. All patients with NSCLC underwent surgery and none received neoadjuvant radiotherapy or chemotherapy. Histological diagnosis (26) and staging (27) were performed for all patients to confirm NSCLC. Tissue microarray technology was performed as previously described (28,29).

Immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining and scores

IHC was performed to detect the expression and cellular location of NCAPH and Mcl-1. IHC assay was performed as previously described (16,28). Tissues were fixed in paraformaldehyde dehydrated in a graded alcohol series, embedded in paraffin and sectioned at 3 µm. Sections were then deparaffinized, rehydrated and endogenous peroxidase inactivated using methanol containing 0.3% H2O2. The slides were incubated with appropriate pre-immune serum (Normal Goat Serum, Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology, cat. no. C0269; diluted to 10% in PBS+0.1% Tween20) for 30 min at room temperature to eliminate nonspecific staining, and the sections were stained overnight at 4°C with 1:100 dilution of primary antibody to NCAPH (Rabbit-anti-NCAPH antibody, Fine Test; Wuhan Fine Biotech Co., Ltd., cat. no. FNab05579), recombinant anti-Mcl-1 antibody (Abcam, cat. no. ab32087). Slides were then exposed to an appropriate secondary antibody (MaxvisionTM2 HRP-Polymer anti-Mouse/Rabbit IHC kit, Fuzhou Maixin Biotech. Co., Ltd., dilution: 1:1, cat. no. KIT-5020) for 30 min at 37°C via EnVision+ Dual Link System-HRP (Dako; Agilent Technologies, Inc.). DAB and chromogen solution were used for color reaction enhancement. Hematoxylin was used to counterstain the slides (37°C for 7 min). A light microscope (BX53, Olympus Corporation) was used to visualize slides and the magnification was ×40 (right corner, zoom out) and ×200, respectively.

NCAPH and Mcl-1 protein expression analysis was performed using semi-quantitative evaluation (28). The staining intensity for NCAPH and Mcl-1 was classified on a scale 0–3 based on the observed color intensity (0=negative, no staining; 1=weak, light brown; 2=moderate, brown and 3=strong, dark brown), and positive rates were evenly divided into five grades [0 (0%), 1 (1–25%), 2 (26–50%), 3 (51–75%), and 4 (76–100%)]. The final staining score for NCAPH and Mcl-1 was determined by the formula: Staining score=positive rates* intensity. The best cut-off score for NCAPH was determined as 4 (high expression was determined when the score was ≥4, while scores <4 were considered negative) based on the survival rate. The optimal cut-off score was determined to be 6 for Mcl-1. The consistency of the two evaluators (Qiuxia Xiong and Songqing Fan) was 95% and differences were solved by discussion between Qiuxia Xiong and Songqing Fan under a two-headed microscope. A light microscope (BX53; Olympus Corporation) was used to visualize slides and the magnification was ×40 (right corner, zoom out) and ×200, respectively.

Statistical analysis

SPSS version 20.0 was used for statistical analysis (IBM Corp.). The association of NCAPH, Mcl-1, and clinical and pathological characteristics was analyzed via the χ2 test and verified using The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database (v21.0; http://portal.gdc.cancer.gov/). The data were generated from the database starBase (v2.0; http://starbase.sysu.edu.cn/panGeneCoExp.php). Overall survival curves were obtained using Kaplan-Meier analysis. The Cox proportional hazard regression model was used for multivariate analysis to determine the potential of positive expression of NCAPH and Mcl-1 as poor prognostic indicators. One-way ANOVA was used for comparisons between groups, and t-test was used for further paired comparisons if differences existed. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.

Results

Protein expression of NCAPH and Mcl-1 in the tissues of LUSC and LUAD

The mutation patterns of NCAPH and Mcl-1 in various cancers were examined (Fig. 1; Table I) (3037). The result showed that the mutation patterns of NCAPH and Mcl-1 existed in various cancers including stomach adenocarcinoma, non-small cell lung cancer, esophagogastric carcinoma, endometrial cancer, colorectal cancer and breast cancer. Immunohistochemistry was conducted to detect the expression and cellular location of NCAPH and Mcl-1 in LUSC, LUAD and the non-cancerous lung control tissues to investigate the connection of NCAPH and Mcl-1 in malignant tissues. The clinicopathological characteristics are presented in Table II. Expression of NCAPH and Mcl-1 was high in NSCLC tissues and was identified in the cell cytoplasm and nuclear tissues and weak positive expression in the bronchial epithelial cells of non-cancerous normal control lung tissue. In the LUAD and LUSC tissues, Mcl-1 was negatively expressed in the matched tissue in which NCAPH was positively expressed and vice versa (Fig. 2A-H). A weak positive expression of NCAPH was identified in the control tissues (Fig. 2I). No positive NCAPH staining was observed in the LUAD tissue sections when the matched immunoglobulin G isotype antibody was stained as a negative control (Fig. 2J). Weak positive expression of Mcl-1 was revealed in the bronchial epithelial cells of non-cancerous control normal lung tissue (Fig. 2K). The negative control demonstrated no expression of Mcl-1 in LUSC (Fig. 2L).

Table I.

Data sources of the mutation patterns of NCAPH and Mcl-1 in various types of cancer.

Table I.

Data sources of the mutation patterns of NCAPH and Mcl-1 in various types of cancer.

Author, yearCancer type(Refs.)
Taylor et al (2018)Stomach adenocarcinoma(30)
Jordan et al (2017)Non-small cell lung cancer(31)
Janjigian et al (2018)Esophagogastric carcinoma(32)
Soumerai et al (2018)Endometrial cancer(33)
Witkiewicz et al (2015)Pancreatic cancer(34)
Ghandi et al (2019)Cancer of unknown primary(35)
Yaeger et al (2018)Colorectal cancer(36)
Pereira et al (2016)Breast cancer(37)

[i] NCAPH, non-SMC condensin I complex subunit H; Mcl-1, myeloid cell leukemia sequence 1.

Table II.

Summary of patients with NSCLC and non-cancerous control lung tissues in the tissue arrays.

Table II.

Summary of patients with NSCLC and non-cancerous control lung tissues in the tissue arrays.

A, NSCLC

Patients characteristicsNo. of patients (%)
Age (years)
  <55118 (45.4)
  ≥55142 (54.6)
Sex
  Male194 (74.6)
  Female66 (25.4)
Clinical stage
  Stage I and II125 (48.1)
  Stage III and IV125 (51.9)
Lymph node status
  No LNM111 (42.7)
  LNM149 (57.3)
Histological type
  SCC129 (49.6)
  ADC131 (50.4)
Differentiation
  Well and moderate117 (45.0)
  Poor143 (55.0)
Survival state
  Living160 (61.5)
  Mortality100 (38.5)

B, Non-cancerous lung tissues

Patients characteristicsNo. of patients (%)

Age (years)
  <5525 (48.1)
  ≥5527 (51.9)
Sex
  Male37 (71.2)
  Female15 (28.8)

[i] NSCLC, non-small cell lung cancer; LNM, lymph node metastasis.

The expression of NCAPH and Mcl-1 in the non-cancerous control lung and NSCLC tissues was quantified (Fig. 2M); the positive percentage of NCAPH in the non-cancerous lung tissues (84.61%: 44/52) was higher than that in NSCLC (67.69%; 176/260; P=0.015). The positive percentage of Mcl-1 in the non-cancerous lung tissues (15.38%; 8/52) was lower compared with that in NSCLC (81.54%; 212/260; P<0.001). The aforementioned results indicated that the positive expression percentage of NCAPH was lower in tissues harvested from patients with patients while the positive percentages of Mcl-1 were significantly higher compared with control lung tissue sections.

Association between NCAPH and Mcl-1 and the clinical characteristics in NSCLC

The univariate χ2 test was used to examine the influence of the altered expression of NCAPH and Mcl-1 in NSCLC tissues on clinical outcomes. The clinicopathological features investigated included age, clinical stage, sex, lymph node (LNM) status, pathological grade and survival state. The high percentage of Mcl-1 expression was significantly associated with histological type (P<0.0001; Table III). The positive percentages of NCAPH were significantly increased in the living group (73.8 vs. 58.0%; P=0.008), while the high percentage of Mcl-1 expression was significantly higher in the mortality group (88.0 vs. 77.5%; P=0.034). However, no association was observed between the expression of NCAPH/Mcl-1 and sex, age, LNM stage or pathological grade.

Table III.

Analysis of the association between expression of NCAPH and Mcl-1 proteins and clinicopathological characteristics of NSCLC.

Table III.

Analysis of the association between expression of NCAPH and Mcl-1 proteins and clinicopathological characteristics of NSCLC.

NCAPHMcl-1


Clinicopathological featuresPositive (%)Negative (%)P-valueHigh (%)Low (%)P-value
Age (years) 0.302 0.567
  <5576 (64.4)42 (35.6) 98 (83.1)20 (16.9)
  ≥55100 (70.4)42 (29.6) 114 (80.3)28 (19.7)
Sex 0.922 0.301
  Male131 (67.5)64 (32.5) 161 (83.0)33 (17.0)
  Female45 (68.2)21 (31.8) 51 (77.3)15 (22.7)
Histological type 0.858 <0.001
  ADC88 (68.2)41 (31.8) 118 (91.51)11 (8.5)
  SCC88 (67.2)43 (32.8) 94 (71.8)37 (28.2)
Clinical stages 0.369 0.768
  Stage I and II88 (70.4)37 (29.6) 101 (80.8)24 (19.2)
  Stage III and V88 (65.2)47 (34.8) 111 (82.2)24 (17.8)
LNM status 0.618 0.421
  No LNM77 (69.4)34 (39.6) 93 (83.8)18 (16.2)
  LNM99 (66.4)50 (33.4) 119 (79.9)30 (20.1)
Pathological grade 0.201 0.247
  Well and moderate84 (71.8)33 (28.2) 99 (84.6)18 (15.4)
  Poor92 (64.3)51 (35.7) 113 (79.0)30 (21.0)
Survival status 0.008a 0.034a
  Alive118 (73.8)42 (26.2) 124 (77.5)36 (22.5)
  Succumbed58 (58.0)42 (42.0) 88 (88.0)12 (12.0)

a P<0.05. Statistical analysis was performed using the χ2 test. NCAPH, non-SMC condensin I complex subunit H; Mcl-1, myeloid cell leukemia sequence 1; NSCLC, non-small cell lung cancer; ADC, lung adenocarcinoma; SCC, lung squamous carcinoma; LNM, Lymph node metastasis.

The pairwise association between NCAPH and Mcl-1 proteins in NSCLC

Pairwise association (Table IV) demonstrated that positive expression of NCAPH protein was associated with negative expression of Mcl-1 protein (r=−0.185, P=0.003), while the positive expression of Mcl-1 protein was associated with negative expression of NCAPH protein (r=−0.185, P=0.003). Therefore, the overexpression of NCAPH protein was negatively associated with the expression of Mcl-1. To evaluate the expression profiles of NCAPH and Mcl-1 in LUAD and LUSC, The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database was analyzed. The results showed that NCAPH is highly expressed in LUAD and LUSC (Fig. 3A), and Mcl-1 is highly expressed in LUAD and LUSC (Fig. 3B). In addition, NCAPH expression is negative associated with Mcl-1, as validated in LUAD and LUSC by utilizing the TCGA dataset (Fig. 3C) (38). In addition, NCAPH was revealed to be negatively associated with pro-survival members including Bcl-2 and Bcl-w, while being positively associated with pro-apoptotic members Bax and Bid (Fig. 4A-D).

Table IV.

The pairwise correlation between expression of NCAPH and Mcl-1 proteins in 260 cases of NSCLC.

Table IV.

The pairwise correlation between expression of NCAPH and Mcl-1 proteins in 260 cases of NSCLC.

ProteinNCAPHMcl-1
NCAPH
  Spearman's correlation coincident1−0.185
  Significance (2-tailed)   0.003a
Mcl-1
  Spearman's correlation coincident−0.1851
  Significance (2-tailed)   0.003a

a P<0.05. NCAPH, non-SMC condensin I complex subunit H; Mcl-1, myeloid cell leukemia sequence 1; NSCLC, non-small cell lung cancer; (−), not available.

Impact of NCAPH and Mcl-1 expression levels on the prognosis in NSCLC

To serve as a control, no significant difference was detected in the overall survival (OS) between patients with LUAD and LUSC from tissue microarrays used in the current study (Fig. 5A; P=0.554). The results of Kaplan-Meier curves indicated that the overall survival rates for patients with lymph node metastasis were lower than for metastasis-free patients (P=0.002; Fig. 5B). Meanwhile, higher NCAPH expression in NSCLC was associated with higher OS rates (P=0.003; Fig. 5C), while patients with high Mcl-1 expression in NSCLC exhibited significantly worse OS rates (P=0.032; Fig. 5D).

Multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression analysis was performed on 260 NSCLC cases. Pathological grades (P=0.017) and clinical stages (P=0.003) were revealed to serve as prognostic factors (Table V). Additionally, the expression of NCAPH (P=0.003) and Mcl-1 (P=0.038) could be considered as distinct prognostic factors in patients with NSCLC. No clinical effect based on age, sex, histological types, LNM, or treatment strategy was detected.

Table V.

Summary of multivariate analysis of Cox proportional hazard regression for overall survival in 260 cases of patients with NSCLC.

Table V.

Summary of multivariate analysis of Cox proportional hazard regression for overall survival in 260 cases of patients with NSCLC.

95.0% CI for Exp (B)

VariableWaldSig.Exp (B)LowerUpper
Age0.0010.9761.0060.6671.517
Sex2.4420.1180.6730.4091.106
Histological types3.2850.0701.5160.9672.376
Pathological grades5.7460.017a1.6891.1002.593
LNM3.8190.0511.5950.9992.547
Clinical stages8.9820.003a2.0551.2833.291
Treatment strategy0.0870.7680.9180.5191.624
NCAPH8.5390.003a0.5440.3610.818
Mcl-14.3240.038a1.9551.0393.678

{ label (or @symbol) needed for fn[@id='tfn5-mmr-22-04-2916'] } Multivariate analysis of Cox regression

a P<0.05. NSCLC, non-small cell lung cancer; LNM, lymph node metastasis; CI, confidence interval; NCAPH, non-SMC condensin I complex subunit H; Mcl-1, myeloid cell leukemia sequence 1.

Discussion

NCAPH is one of the members of the barr gene family and is located on chromosome 2q11.2 (39). A previous study has indicated that NCAPH is one of the essential factors for maintaining cell survival and is indispensable in mitotic chromosome cohesion and separation (40). Mcl-1 is homologous to Bcl-2 and possesses an anti-apoptotic effect in regulating cell survival (41). Compared with healthy lungs, the overexpression of Mcl-1 in NSCLC lines is associated with poor patient prognosis. Mcl-1 belongs to the pro-apoptotic Bcl-2 family, maintains its inactive monomeric state and antagonizes the signaling of cellular apoptosis, particularly in Mcl-1-overexpressing NSCLC cell lines (23). In addition, the depletion of Mcl-1 results in increased sensitivity to radiotherapy and chemotherapy in NSCLC cells (42). Huang et al (43) revealed that Mcl-1 promotes the migration of lung cancer cells through a mechanism involving Ca2+-dependent reactive oxygen species production. Therefore, Mcl-1 has been demonstrated to serve an important role in NSCLC cell survival by limiting apoptotic signaling.

In the present study, the protein expression of NCAPH and Mcl-1 were examined by IHC in tissues of 260 cases of NSCLC. The data demonstrated that NCAPH and Mcl-1 were highly expressed in NSCLC cancerous tissues; with positive expression in the cytoplasm and nucleus and weak positive expression in the bronchial epithelial cells of non-cancerous normal control lung tissue. The expression of NCAPH and Mcl-1 was negatively associated in the matched tissues of LUAD and LUSC. Pairwise association also demonstrated that NCAPH and Mcl-1 overexpression were inversely associated.

Precise biomarkers are essential for providing a reference for NSCLC prognosis in the tumor-node-metastasis staging system; one of the most effective prognostic methods for operable NSCLC (42). Therefore, it is important to identify novel biomarkers that can help to determine the risks of tumor occurrence and progression. According to the association analysis data between NCAPH and Mcl-1, the high expression percentage of Mcl-1 was positively associated with histological type in NSCLC. In addition, the positive percentage expression of NCAPH was significantly elevated in the living group, while the percentage expression of Mcl-1 was increased in the mortality group. Positive NCAPH expression was associated with higher OS rates, whereas, high Mcl-1 expression was inversely associated with OS rates. These results indicated that the expression of NCAPH and Mcl-1 may be associated with the development and progression of NSCLC and can be considered to be independent prognostic factors. Multiple regulatory mechanisms including ubiquitination and subsequent proteasomal degradation have been shown to control Mcl-1 functions by regulating its expression in response to different stimuli (44). Recent studies validate the non-apoptotic functions of Mcl-1 in autophagy, mitochondrial homeostasis and protein kinase cascade signaling (45). Mcl-1 physically interacts with a number of cell cycle regulators in the nucleus (including PCNA and Chk1), thus regulating the checkpoint response (46,47). This leads to the hypothesis that NCAPH could also form a complex with, and negatively regulate, Mcl-1 expression during NSCLC progression. This hypothesis should be investigated in future studies due to the lack of current proteasome data from the NCAPH complex. In conclusion, the expression of NCAPH protein was associated with the expression of Mcl-1 in patients with NSCLC, and the positive expression of NCAPH may serve as one of the independent prognostic factors in surgically resected patients with this disease.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Dr Nigel W. Fraser, Dept of Microbiology, Pereleman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, USA, for his instructive comments on the writing of the manuscript.

Funding

The present study was supported by Yunnan Provincial Department of science and Technology-Kunming Medical University applied basic research joint project in 2019 (grant no. 2019FE001 (−042)) and Scientific research projects of research institutions in medical and health units of Yunnan Province in 2018 (grant no. 2018NS0111).

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Authors' contributions

QX, YD, SF, LD and XC conceived and designed the experiments. YD, QX, SF, BL, XJ, CX, QT, HZ and JW performed the experiments. QX, SF, CX, CC and JW analyzed the data. YD, QX, SF, XC, JW, HZ, YD and QT contributed reagents, materials or analytical tools. YD, QX, SF, LD, QT and CX wrote the manuscript. QX, SF, XC and BL accessed the full-text articles. XJ generated the revised Fig. 4. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The present study was approved by the Scientific and Research Ethics Committee of the Second Xiangya Hospital (approval no. S039/2011). Patients were fully informed about specimen usage and data retrieval prior to the acquisition of specimens. Written informed consent was obtained from each patient. Informed consent was obtained from a parent and/or legal guardian for subjects <18 years old.

Patient consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

1 

Torre LA, Siegel RL, Ward EM and Jemal A: Global cancer incidence and mortality rates and trends-an update. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 25:2916–27. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar

2 

Chen M, Liu X, Du J, Wang XJ and Xia L: Differentiated regulation of immune-response related genes between LUAD and LUSC subtypes of lung cancers. Oncotarget. 8:133–144. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

3 

Yoshioka H, Shimokawa M, Seto T, Morita S, Yatabe Y, Okamoto I, Tsurutani J, Satouchi M, Hirashima T, Atagi S, et al: Final overall survival results of WJTOG3405, a randomized phase III trial comparing gefitinib versus cisplatin with docetaxel as the first-line treatment for patients with stage IIIB/IV or postoperative recurrent EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer. Ann Oncol. 30:1978–1984. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

4 

Bobbili P, Ryan K, Duh MS, Dua A, Fernandes AW, Pavilack M and Gomez JE: Treatment patterns and overall survival among patients with unresectable, stage III non-small-cell lung cancer. Future Oncol. 15:3381–3393. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

5 

León-Atance P, Moreno-Mata N, González-Aragoneses F, Cañizares-Carretero MA, García-Jiménez MD, Genovés-Crespo M, Honguero-Martínez AF, Rombolá CA, Simón-Adiego CM and Peñalver-Pascual R: Multicenter analysis of survival and prognostic factors in pathologic stage I non-small-cell lung cancer according to the new 2009 TNM Classification. Arch Bronconeumol. 47:441–446. 2011.(In English, Spanish). View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

6 

Criss SD, Mooradian MJ, Watson TR, Gainor JF, Reynolds KL and Kong CY: Cost-effectiveness of atezolizumab combination therapy for first-line treatment of metastatic nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer in the United States. JAMA Netw Open. 2:e19119522019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

7 

Rosser CJ and Goodison S: CD24, a promising biomarker in NSCLC. Biomark Med. 4:4952010. View Article : Google Scholar

8 

Zhan SJ, Liu B and Linghu H: Identifying genes as potential prognostic indicators in patients with serous ovarian cancer resistant to carboplatin using integrated bioinformatics analysis. Oncol Rep. 39:2653–2663. 2018.PubMed/NCBI

9 

Sun C, Huang S, Wang H, Xie R, Zhang L, Zhou Q, He X and Ju W: Non-SMC condensin I complex subunit H enhances proliferation, migration, and invasion of hepatocellular carcinoma. Mol Carcinog. 58:2266–2275. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

10 

Hirano T: Condensins: Universal organizers of chromosomes with diverse functions. Genes Dev. 26:1659–1678. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

11 

Wood AJ, Severson AF and Meyer BJ: Condensin and cohesin complexity: The expanding repertoire of functions. Nat Rev Genet. 11:391–404. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

12 

Kimura K, Cuvier O and Hirano T: Chromosome condensation by a human condensin complex in xenopus egg extracts. J Biol Chem. 276:5417–5420. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

13 

Martin CA, Murray JE, Carroll P, Leitch A, Mackenzie KJ, Halachev M, Fetit AE, Keith C, Bicknell LS, Fluteau A, et al: Mutations in genes encoding condensin complex proteins cause microcephaly through decatenation failure at mitosis. Genes Dev. 30:2158–2172. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

14 

Yin L, Jiang LP, Shen QS, Xiong QX, Zhuo X, Zhang LL, Yu HJ, Guo X, Luo Y, Dong J, et al: NCAPH plays important roles in human colon cancer. Cell Death Dis. 8:e26802017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

15 

Ryu B, Kim DS, Deluca AM and Alani RM: Comprehensive expression profiling of tumor cell lines identifies molecular signatures of melanoma progression. PLoS One. 2:e5942007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

16 

Xu L, Jiang Y, Zheng J, Xie G, Li J, Shi L and Fan S: Aberrant expression of β-catenin and e-cadherin is correlated with poor prognosis of nasopharyngeal cancer. Hum Pathol. 44:1357–1364. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

17 

Granville CA and Dennis PA: An overview of lung cancer genomics and proteomics. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 32:169–176. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

18 

Kozopas KM, Yang T, Buchan HL, Zhou P and Craig RW: MCL1, a gene expressed in programmed myeloid cell differentiation, has sequence similarity to BCL2. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 90:3516–3520. 1993. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

19 

Han Y, Wu N, Jiang M, Chu Y, Wang Z, Liu H, Cao J, Liu H, Xu B and Xie X: Long non-coding RNA MYOSLID functions as a competing endogenous RNA to regulate MCL-1 expression by sponging miR-29c-3p in gastric cancer. Cell Prolif. 52:e126782019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

20 

Kour S, Rana S, Contreras JI, King HM, Robb CM, Sonawane YA, Bendjennat M, Crawford AJ, Barger CJ, Kizhake S, et al: CDK5 inhibitor downregulates Mcl-1 and sensitizes pancreatic cancer cell lines to navitoclax. Mol Pharmacol. 96:419–429. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

21 

Meister MT, Boedicker C, Linder B, Kogel D, Klingebiel T and Fulda S: Concomitant targeting of Hedgehog signaling and MCL-1 synergistically induces cell death in Hedgehog-driven cancer cells. Cancer Lett. 465:1–11. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

22 

Akgul C: Mcl-1 is a potential therapeutic target in multiple types of cancer. Cell Mol Life Sci. 66:1326–1336. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

23 

Zhang H, Guttikonda S, Roberts L, Uziel T, Semizarov D, Elmore SW, Leverson JD and Lam LT: Mcl-1 is critical for survival in a subgroup of non-small-cell lung cancer cell lines. Oncogene. 30:1963–1968. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

24 

Whitsett TG, Mathews IT, Cardone MH, Lena RJ, Pierceall WE, Bittner M, Sima C, LoBello J, Weiss GJ and Tran NL: Mcl-1 mediates TWEAK/Fn14-induced non-small cell lung cancer survival and therapeutic response. Mol Cancer Res. 12:550–559. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

25 

Yang S, Kim CY, Hwang S, Kim E, Kim H, Shim H and Lee I: COEXPEDIA: Exploring biomedical hypotheses via co-expressions associated with medical subject headings (MeSH). Nucleic Acids Res. 45(D1):D389–D396. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar

26 

Travis WD, Brambilla E, Burke AP, Marx A and Nicholson AG: WHO Classification of tumours of the lung, pleura, thymus and heart. WHO Classification of Tumours. 7. 4th. IARC; Lyon: 2015

27 

Boffa DJ and Greene FL: Reacting to changes in staging designations in the 7th edition of the AJCC staging manual. Ann Surg Oncol. 18:1–3. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

28 

Wen Q, Wang W, Luo J, Chu S, Chen L, Xu L, Zang H, Alnemah MM, Ma J and Fan S: CGP57380 enhances efficacy of RAD001 in non-small cell lung cancer through abrogating mTOR inhibition-induced phosphorylation of eIF4E and activating mitochondrial apoptotic pathway. Oncotarget. 7:27787–27801. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

29 

Wen Q, Wang W, Chu S, Luo J, Chen L, Xie G, Xu L, Li M and Fan S: Flot-2 expression correlates with EGFR levels and poor prognosis in surgically resected non-small cell lung cancer. PLoS One. 10:e01321902015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

30 

Taylor AM, Shih J, Ha G, Gao GF, Zhang X, Berger AC, Schumacher SE, Wang C, Hu H, Liu J, et al: Genomic and functional approaches to understanding cancer aneuploidy. Cancer Cell. 33:676–689.e673. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

31 

Jordan EJ, Kim HR, Arcila ME, Barron D, Chakravarty D, Gao J, Chang MT, Ni A, Kundra R, Jonsson P, et al: Prospective comprehensive molecular characterization of lung adenocarcinomas for efficient patient matching to approved and emerging therapies. Cancer Discov. 7:596–609. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

32 

Janjigian YY, Sanchez-Vega F, Jonsson P, Chatila WK, Hechtman JF, Ku GY, Riches JC, Tuvy Y, Kundra R, Bouvier N, et al: Genetic predictors of response to systemic therapy in esophagogastric cancer. Cancer Discov. 8:49–58. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

33 

Soumerai TE, Donoghue MTA, Bandlamudi C, Srinivasan P, Chang MT, Zamarin D, Cadoo KA, Grisham RN, O'Cearbhaill RE, Tew WP, et al: Clinical utility of prospective molecular characterization in advanced endometrial cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 24:5939–5947. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

34 

Witkiewicz AK, McMillan EA, Balaji U, Baek G, Lin WC, Mansour J, Mollaee M, Wagner KU, Koduru P, Yopp A, et al: Whole-exome sequencing of pancreatic cancer defines genetic diversity and therapeutic targets. Nat Commun. 6:67442015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

35 

Ghandi M, Huang FW, Jané-Valbuena J, Kryukov GV, Lo CC, McDonald ER III, Barretina J, Gelfand ET, Bielski CM, Li H, et al: Next-generation characterization of the cancer cell line encyclopedia. Nature. 569:503–508. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

36 

Yaeger R, Chatila WK, Lipsyc MD, Hechtman JF, Cercek A, Sanchez-Vega F, Jayakumaran G, Middha S, Zehir A, Donoghue MTA, et al: Clinical sequencing defines the genomic landscape of metastatic colorectal cancer. Cancer Cell. 33:125–136.e3. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

37 

Pereira B, Chin SF, Rueda OM, Vollan HK, Provenzano E, Bardwell HA, Pugh M, Jones L, Russell R, Sammut SJ, et al: The somatic mutation profiles of 2,433 breast cancers refines their genomic and transcriptomic landscapes. Nat Commun. 7:114792016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

38 

Li JH, Liu S, Zhou H, Qu LH and Yang JH: StarBase v2.0: Decoding miRNA-ceRNA, miRNA-ncRNA and protein-RNA interaction networks from large-scale CLIP-Seq data. Nucleic Acids Res. 42((Database Issue)): D92–D97. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

39 

Neuwald AF and Hirano T: HEAT repeats associated with condensins, cohesins, and other complexes involved in chromosome-related functions. Genome Res. 10:1445–1452. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

40 

Lawrimore J and Bloom K: The regulation of chromosome segregation via centromere loops. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol. 54:352–370. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

41 

Senichkin VV, Streletskaia AY, Zhivotovsky B and Kopeina GS: Molecular comprehension of Mcl-1: From gene structure to cancer therapy. Trends Cell Biol. 29:549–562. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

42 

Song L, Coppola D, Livingston S, Cress D and Haura EB: Mcl-1 regulates survival and sensitivity to diverse apoptotic stimuli in human non-small cell lung cancer cells. Cancer Biol Ther. 4:267–276. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

43 

Huang H, Shah K, Bradbury NA, Li C and White C: Mcl-1 promotes lung cancer cell migration by directly interacting with VDAC to increase mitochondrial Ca2+ uptake and reactive oxygen species generation. Cell Death Dis. 5:e14822014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

44 

Mojsa B, Lassot I and Desagher S: Mcl-1 ubiquitination: Unique regulation of an essential survival protein. Cells. 3:418–437. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

45 

Young AI, Timpson P, Gallego-Ortega D, Ormandy CJ and Oakes SR: Myeloid cell leukemia 1 (MCL-1), an unexpected modulator of protein kinase signaling during invasion. Cell Adh Migr. 12:513–523. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

46 

Fujise K, Zhang D, Liu J and Yeh ET: Regulation of apoptosis and cell cycle progression by MCL1: Differential role of proliferating cell nuclear antigen. J Biol Chem. 275:39458–39465. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

47 

Jamil S, Mojtabavi S, Hojabrpour P, Cheah S and Duronio V: An essential role for MCL-1 in ATR-mediated CHK1 phosphorylation. Mol Biol Cell. 19:3212–3220. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Related Articles

Journal Cover

October-2020
Volume 22 Issue 4

Print ISSN: 1791-2997
Online ISSN:1791-3004

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Xiong Q, Fan S, Duan L, Liu B, Jiang X, Chen X, Xiong C, Tao Q, Wang J, Zhang H, Zhang H, et al: NCAPH is negatively associated with Mcl‑1 in non‑small cell lung cancer . Mol Med Rep 22: 2916-2924, 2020
APA
Xiong, Q., Fan, S., Duan, L., Liu, B., Jiang, X., Chen, X. ... Duan, Y. (2020). NCAPH is negatively associated with Mcl‑1 in non‑small cell lung cancer . Molecular Medicine Reports, 22, 2916-2924. https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2020.11359
MLA
Xiong, Q., Fan, S., Duan, L., Liu, B., Jiang, X., Chen, X., Xiong, C., Tao, Q., Wang, J., Zhang, H., Chen, C., Duan, Y."NCAPH is negatively associated with Mcl‑1 in non‑small cell lung cancer ". Molecular Medicine Reports 22.4 (2020): 2916-2924.
Chicago
Xiong, Q., Fan, S., Duan, L., Liu, B., Jiang, X., Chen, X., Xiong, C., Tao, Q., Wang, J., Zhang, H., Chen, C., Duan, Y."NCAPH is negatively associated with Mcl‑1 in non‑small cell lung cancer ". Molecular Medicine Reports 22, no. 4 (2020): 2916-2924. https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2020.11359